I have seen it in practice working. Business talk to data owners(Data service team) what they need Data Owner talk to IT team and ask what data and when is needed IT team provide the solutions to deliver the data as requested to data owner team. data owner team ensure completeness check, and confirm the data. business uses the data and runs business.
when data is considered to be a valuable asset in the organisation, data governance becomes obvious. data governance is a more cultural thing, it is related to the ways of working and business processes than to technology and IT.
Intricity101 One of your key sentences and proofs was stated vaguely: that Business should own data governance because business knows how the data should look. *What does “look” mean there?* This reflects a problem I had with business: because they could work with and understand only one worksheet at a time (and for their purposes, that was how it should look when presented to them), they wanted an entire database stored on a single worksheet. So knowing how it should look to Business doesn’t necessarily say anything about how the data is handled before they see it. But I suspect that that is not what you meant.
So it's sounding like the business is trying to dictate the technical framework. This is where you might want to push back. By look I mean the quality and context of the data. Formatting DOES fit in their wheelhouse, but there needs to be a recognition that there are limitations to how much data an interface can scalably house.
Stands for Information Technology. This is usually a departmental name for the technical community inside an organization. Yes Business Intelligence would be under IT.
“Data governance is the organization and implementation of policies, procedures, structure, roles, and responsibilities which outline and enforce rules of engagement, decision rights, and accountabilities for the effective management of information assets.”
![เปิดบ้าน นาราเครปกระเทย 1 ไร่ ขายขาดทุนหลัก10ล้าน เอามาใช้หนี้!!! l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0jz84VFWVP4/mqdefault.jpg)
"IT doesn't have enough context to fix the data, and the business users believe it's an 'IT issue.'" Spot on.
Thanks Jubach
Classic Business - always passing the buck along ;)
I have seen it in practice working.
Business talk to data owners(Data service team) what they need
Data Owner talk to IT team and ask what data and when is needed
IT team provide the solutions to deliver the data as requested to data owner team.
data owner team ensure completeness check, and confirm the data.
business uses the data and runs business.
@@flanker23 who do you mean by data owners?
@@flanker23 would love to learn more on this. Curious, if you’re interested in a quick chat. I work as a Data Pm.
One of the best data governance videos I have seen.
Thanks Jeremy
this is one enormous analogy, just define it and get to the point my goodness
when data is considered to be a valuable asset in the organisation, data governance becomes obvious. data governance is a more cultural thing, it is related to the ways of working and business processes than to technology and IT.
Intricity101 One of your key sentences and proofs was stated vaguely: that Business should own data governance because business knows how the data should look.
*What does “look” mean there?*
This reflects a problem I had with business: because they could work with and understand only one worksheet at a time (and for their purposes, that was how it should look when presented to them), they wanted an entire database stored on a single worksheet.
So knowing how it should look to Business doesn’t necessarily say anything about how the data is handled before they see it. But I suspect that that is not what you meant.
So it's sounding like the business is trying to dictate the technical framework. This is where you might want to push back. By look I mean the quality and context of the data. Formatting DOES fit in their wheelhouse, but there needs to be a recognition that there are limitations to how much data an interface can scalably house.
Intricity101 Thank you. I would not have guessed Look meant “quality and context”
Who is/are IT exactly? Database Team, Database Admin, Data Engineer?
Does e.g. Business Intelligence Team belong to IT as well?
Stands for Information Technology. This is usually a departmental name for the technical community inside an organization. Yes Business Intelligence would be under IT.
@@Intricity101 Thanks for your fast response!
Can I take Data governance foundation course in Informatica as a layman?
nice video, thanks for sharing!
Thanks! Give us a share on socials. We're hoping to raise awareness about our channel.
Good Video.
Thanks Mr.
Thanks Mr. it was very helpful!!
Brilliant!
love all videos you made !
Thanks Proma. Please share on LinkedIn!!
Most useful definition - “data governance is the
stuff you have to do so our system doesn’t fail.”
“Data governance is the organization and implementation of policies, procedures, structure, roles, and responsibilities which outline and enforce rules of engagement, decision rights, and accountabilities for the effective management of
information assets.”
Good Start
this video is quite insightful^^
Jared speaks my language. Easy.
Thanks Steve!
Well explained in layman's terms
Thanks Alpesh!
Thank u very useful
Nice videos!
Bravo!!!
Thanks Viabhav!
Thanks
I participated in many donut meetings🥺, I even gained weight.