Hi Ma'am your lecture is very knowledgeable, kindly tell me in AEO incorrect example, for the first premise how you shaded (ignore) the animal ring side when it is saying all birds are animals... I am confused and in AEO Correct example Premise I is all animals are birds... and you ignored the region towards animal circil side where as in AEO Incorrect Premise I is All bird are animals and you again ignored the region towards animal circle side.
Ma'am first of all thank you for this lecture. Due to the method taught by you i could point out that in AEO (incorrect) example you shaded the wrong part by mistake. In All Birds are animals statement (18:01) the bottom left portion of the circle must be shaded. Thanks a lot for your videos and amazing knowledge.
Wow, such an amazing woman, even with the accent difference, I have learned so much in the last 3 videos, compared to hours of western teachers. Thank you so much for this teaching style, great job. Maybe anyone in comments can help me, I'm trying to link these syllogisms to propositional logic. Am I right or close. All s are p = if s then p No s are p = s or p Some s are p = s and p No s are p = not s or p Help me please.
What we have to conclude about EAO-3 ? Is it a "valid" syllogism or not according to your example? Here M is "birds". Is it an existential fallacy or not ?
Please check out the link - www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm for syllogism based on possibilities
Mam where can i get problems with more than three statements with more subjects and many conclusions and can i get the newest pattern questions asked in Bank exams
+kumar This is a case of conditional validity, you can refer www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm (specially the table) for details on finding out the concept of existential validity. For AEO to be true, S must exist.
+anand shankar To understand the concept of 1, 2,3 and 4 please refer the Part 1 of Syllogism video available at th-cam.com/video/TVtQcTjf8ac/w-d-xo.html
Statements: Some teachers are professors. Some lecturers are teachers. Conclusions: I. All teachers as well as professors being lecturers is a possibility. II. All those teachers who are lecturers are also professors. how to solve above question. question like this are asked in examination these days
+compos mentis We have solved the question at the following link - www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm. Very briefly, conclusion 1 is true because the premises do not preclude the possibility of all teachers as well as professors being lecturers. Conclusion 2 is false because according to premises it is not at all necessary that all teachers who are professors are also lecturers.
Dear Madam Thanks for your wonderful lecture.... "What my doubt is if more than two statements are given" how to solve those type of problems by using venn diagram
madam is it necessary to draw a conclusion of form i.e 1/2/3/4 .is it necessary to correlate every time.or you explained for better understanding.please answer.
![สาวเมืองเพชร - ธีเดช ทองอภิชาติ [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kEt7F9PvO3I/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi Ma'am your lecture is very knowledgeable, kindly tell me in AEO incorrect example, for the first premise how you shaded (ignore) the animal ring side when it is saying all birds are animals... I am confused and in AEO Correct example Premise I is all animals are birds... and you ignored the region towards animal circil side where as in AEO Incorrect Premise I is All bird are animals and you again ignored the region towards animal circle side.
Yes please note, shading in AEO incorrect based on Premise 1 - All bird are animals will be shading towards side of birds
@@Examrace 4 statement ho to
Very good explanation mam👌
Thank you
Complete course @ www.doorsteptutor.com/Exams/UGC/Paper-1/Lectures/
Ma'am first of all thank you for this lecture. Due to the method taught by you i could point out that in AEO (incorrect) example you shaded the wrong part by mistake. In All Birds are animals statement (18:01) the bottom left portion of the circle must be shaded.
Thanks a lot for your videos and amazing knowledge.
Wow, such an amazing woman, even with the accent difference, I have learned so much in the last 3 videos, compared to hours of western teachers.
Thank you so much for this teaching style, great job.
Maybe anyone in comments can help me, I'm trying to link these syllogisms to propositional logic.
Am I right or close.
All s are p = if s then p
No s are p = s or p
Some s are p = s and p
No s are p = not s or p
Help me please.
thanks ma'am,I watched this lecture 4 times
Thanks ma'am I watched this lecture 4 times
so thanks mam .whached syllogism lecture three time
Very very thnq mam
Proud to be having a madam like you. Me from Kashmir
thanks mam'm
respected ma'am thank u😝😝😝😝
35463
What we have to conclude about EAO-3 ?
Is it a "valid" syllogism or not according to your example?
Here M is "birds".
Is it an existential fallacy or not ?
But.. how to solve if there are more than 4 statements??
Mam pls provide me video of syllogism based on possibilities
Please check out the link - www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm for syllogism based on possibilities
Mam where can i get problems with more than three statements with more subjects and many conclusions and can i get the newest pattern questions asked in Bank exams
Refer Euler problems @ th-cam.com/video/GZATEVFAkj0/w-d-xo.html
jayoti devi-93688
In AEO Incorrect example- how can we say that parrot doesn't exist by looking at the two statements. Plz clarify on this mam
+kumar This is a case of conditional validity, you can refer www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm (specially the table) for details on finding out the concept of existential validity.
For AEO to be true, S must exist.
mam how can be solve with more than two statement problem
i watch all 3 vedio of your how can be learn full topic syllogism A TO Z
+Deepak Chauhan Please refer the following link for multiple statement problems - th-cam.com/video/GZATEVFAkj0/w-d-xo.html
hello mam last lecture on syllogism was so much confusing due to concept of 1,2,3,4 .try to more clear plse.
+anand shankar To understand the concept of 1, 2,3 and 4 please refer the Part 1 of Syllogism video available at th-cam.com/video/TVtQcTjf8ac/w-d-xo.html
hello mam, what should i do if there are more than two premises present in question ?
You will have to use Euler Diagram to solve such questions - th-cam.com/video/GZATEVFAkj0/w-d-xo.html
Statements:
Some teachers are professors.
Some lecturers are teachers.
Conclusions:
I. All teachers as well as professors being
lecturers is a possibility.
II. All those teachers who are lecturers are
also professors.
how to solve above question. question like this are asked in examination these days
+compos mentis We have solved the question at the following link - www.examrace.com/IAS/IAS-Updates/NEWS-Solving-Syllogism-Problem-asked-as-TH-cam-Comment.htm. Very briefly, conclusion 1 is true because the premises do not preclude the possibility of all teachers as well as professors being lecturers. Conclusion 2 is false because according to premises it is not at all necessary that all teachers who are professors are also lecturers.
Dear Madam
Thanks for your wonderful lecture.... "What my doubt is if more than two statements are given" how to solve those type of problems by using venn diagram
You will have to use Euler Diagram to solve such questions - th-cam.com/video/GZATEVFAkj0/w-d-xo.html
Mam solvetheproblems with venn diagram solve syllogism problem that has 2 conclusions
Refer - th-cam.com/video/ME41ocHC3JM/w-d-xo.html
madam is it necessary to draw a conclusion of form i.e 1/2/3/4 .is it necessary to correlate every time.or you explained for better understanding.please answer.
24651