3:40: "...you can definitely tell causality because exposure precedes disease." What about confounding then, which is a problem for both cohort and case-control?
In retrospective cohort, the exposures are already known (so are the outcomes) before the study starts. The group of people that are part of the study are chosen based on the exposures they have encountered. In case-control, exposures are unknown when the study start. It means that you pick up a group of sick people and another one of people who are not. The group studies are chosen based on the fact that they have the disease regardless of their past exposure. The study is then looking backward on these exposures to look for some that might be related to the disease. When analysing the potential relationship of an exposure (smoking) to a disease (cancer) you can evaluate the (exposed and sick; exposed and not sick; not exposed and sick; not exposed and not sick). And then calculate the chance that is truly having an effect to getting the disease. With retrospective cohort study, it's easier to find the 4 conditions when building your group study since you know the exposures of all the patients. With case control it can be more tricky. For instance you could have only smoking people amongst both group of selected people (sick and not sick). Because you didn't know their exposure before. Of course it's easy to ask them if they are smoking but this exemple has to be taken as if you don't know smoking might be a cause. So it's tricky because you kinda gamble with the exposures of your selected study groups. That's how I see it. I might be wrong but I hope it can help somes getting the idea!
@@S.sangma2839 In retrospective cohort, you can study multiple diseases that you suspect may be caused by a particular risk factor (exposure). In case control study, you can study multiple risk factors that you suspect may be cause of a particular disease.
In retrospective cohort, all the patients have the "exposure" and you try to discover some relationship with the outcome. In case-control, not everyone has the exposure.
Thank you! I use Sketchbook Express (available free on the app store) as the drawing program, and Camtasia as the screen capture and video editing software. I hope that helps.
I have a science fair coming up at my high school and I am really interested in doing a Case-Control Study. I have two questions, first, I wanted to do a study to see if suffering from a traumatic injury that resulted in the fracture increases a person chance of developing Rheumatoid Arthritis. Would this be a good study? and Also about finding Cases and Controls how would suggest that I set out to do this?
Hears a 6 year late answer. Easiest way would be having access to a hospital/clinic's database in order to extract this kind of information. So only if a family friend/relative who's in the medical field can definitely hook you up. Other than that you can do a systematic review/meta-analysis on case reports/case series using Pubmed.gov and to extract an overall odds ratio (OR) for the risk factors your analyzing. If you do that my guy, your female teachers/classmates will be all over ur cock. Works just as well in medical school, trust me
What type of study design and measure of association would you suggest to study the possible association between AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS- CoV-2 and blood clot? Is case-control applicable?
What type of study design was used? A study designed to identify risk factors associated with myocardial infarction (MI) was initiated in 1990 and is still underway. All of the 1000 men randomly selected to participate in the study in 1990 were free of CHD. Two hundred of these subjects were classified as hypertensive while the remaining subjects were normotensive. At the 20 year follow-up in 2010, 50 of the 200 hypertensive subjects had suffered an acute MI. Eighty of the normotensive subjects had suffered an MI during this period (1990-2010).
You tell us we cannot confirm the casuality in case control bcz whether or not this specific exposure caused for disease. Thats okey But how can we confirm casuality for sure in cohort ?
really enjoyed the visual! you made it easy to understand thank-you :)
you can't get an any better explanation that this !
Absolutely great video, neat and easy to understand, thank you
This is so simple and helpful!
Thank you so much
Thanks a lot. Wish I had found your video sooner. Your explain things way better compared to my lecturer lol
Thank you!
7 years later .
interesting and easy to understand, thanks!!
Nicely done. Will link this for our Epi students.
Thanks a lot. Finally understood Cohort!
One word ... PERFECT !!!
Thank you so much for the video.
Excellent explanation ! thank you
Very simple and neat 🤩
Thank you very much!!
Great explanation sir! Thanks ❤
Excellent ...I loved your explanation very much
great simplifying vid :) thank you!
amazing,,u made it so clear and easy ,thank u
Thank you so much for this video, helped me a lot :)
Thanks for the video. I like to share it to my public health students.
god blessed you helped a tottaly random algerian med student
Very simple, very useful, thanks
explanation is clear... very helpful
Thanks for the video it was so helpful, can you explain for us the "nested case control" please.
Amazing! Thank you!
Thank you very much for the vid, you made it very clear
Nicely done!!
Amazing explanation! 💓
Nice explanation!!
Keep going ...thanx alot :)
3:40: "...you can definitely tell causality because exposure precedes disease."
What about confounding then, which is a problem for both cohort and case-control?
Maybe he wanted to say temporality?
man i love you. thanks so much
excellent !!!! thank you
Hi, good presentation. What whiteboard software do you use for these classes?
thanks for the video!
A quick question: What is the difference then between retropsective cohort vs Case-Control?
In retrospective cohort, the exposures are already known (so are the outcomes) before the study starts. The group of people that are part of the study are chosen based on the exposures they have encountered.
In case-control, exposures are unknown when the study start. It means that you pick up a group of sick people and another one of people who are not.
The group studies are chosen based on the fact that they have the disease regardless of their past exposure.
The study is then looking backward on these exposures to look for some that might be related to the disease.
When analysing the potential relationship of an exposure (smoking) to a disease (cancer) you can evaluate the (exposed and sick; exposed and not sick; not exposed and sick; not exposed and not sick).
And then calculate the chance that is truly having an effect to getting the disease.
With retrospective cohort study, it's easier to find the 4 conditions when building your group study since you know the exposures of all the patients.
With case control it can be more tricky.
For instance you could have only smoking people amongst both group of selected people (sick and not sick). Because you didn't know their exposure before.
Of course it's easy to ask them if they are smoking but this exemple has to be taken as if you don't know smoking might be a cause.
So it's tricky because you kinda gamble with the exposures of your selected study groups.
That's how I see it. I might be wrong but I hope it can help somes getting the idea!
In retrospective cohort, we can study multiple diseases at once unlike case controlled,which is limited to a particular disease.I hope it helps.
@@anjoomayub2815 can you give an example?
@@valkirynick thank you
@@S.sangma2839 In retrospective cohort, you can study multiple diseases that you suspect may be caused by a particular risk factor (exposure).
In case control study, you can study multiple risk factors that you suspect may be cause of a particular disease.
that was amazing. thank you
Astonished!
Love your vids - GRATITUDE!
( Note: experimenters can be female or they etc. not to exclude the majority of the pop. ;)
whats the diffrence between a retrospective cohort study and a case-control?
In retrospective cohort, all the patients have the "exposure" and you try to discover some relationship with the outcome.
In case-control, not everyone has the exposure.
Thank you sir.
Thank you man!!
Excellent presentation; can you tell me what the drawing package is that you are using?
Thank you! I use Sketchbook Express (available free on the app store) as the drawing program, and Camtasia as the screen capture and video editing software. I hope that helps.
daf189 Thanks
Thank you!
Erudite and very pleasant delivery! Thank you very much!
I have a science fair coming up at my high school and I am really interested in doing a Case-Control Study. I have two questions, first, I wanted to do a study to see if suffering from a traumatic injury that resulted in the fracture increases a person chance of developing Rheumatoid Arthritis. Would this be a good study? and Also about finding Cases and Controls how would suggest that I set out to do this?
Hears a 6 year late answer.
Easiest way would be having access to a hospital/clinic's database in order to extract this kind of information. So only if a family friend/relative who's in the medical field can definitely hook you up.
Other than that you can do a systematic review/meta-analysis on case reports/case series using Pubmed.gov and to extract an overall odds ratio (OR) for the risk factors your analyzing. If you do that my guy, your female teachers/classmates will be all over ur cock.
Works just as well in medical school, trust me
What type of study design and measure of association would you suggest to study the possible association between AstraZeneca vaccine against SARS- CoV-2 and blood clot? Is case-control applicable?
Love your videos 😍😍😍😍
Thank you so much
a quick question:is exposure and outcome only applies to health research?
This might be 8 years late, but thanks for the lesson.
Beautiful❤
Thanks !!!
Very helpful
so is it ok to say that case control studies are basically retrospective cohort studies??
What type of study design was used?
A study designed to identify risk factors associated with myocardial infarction (MI) was initiated in 1990 and is still underway. All of the 1000 men randomly selected to participate in the study in 1990 were free of CHD. Two hundred of these subjects were classified as hypertensive while the remaining subjects were normotensive. At the 20 year follow-up in 2010, 50 of the 200 hypertensive subjects had suffered an acute MI. Eighty of the normotensive subjects had suffered an MI during this period (1990-2010).
Retrospective cohort
OR Prospective cohort ?
Nested cohort
Thank you
can u upoad all epidemiology lecture in sequence
very nice video
Thanks
You tell us we cannot confirm the casuality in case control bcz whether or not this specific exposure caused for disease. Thats okey
But how can we confirm casuality for sure in cohort ?
very clear TANK YOU SO MUCH🤍👍🏻
Did you mean to say "After the disease is known" for retrospective?
This is the JG guy right!!😂😂😂
👍
U great
eliminate recall bias by using administrative data -- aka not a survey
Thanks