Quantum: Slaters Determinant

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 50

  • @chemistry-basicstoadvanced714
    @chemistry-basicstoadvanced714 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    appreciable effort...
    it would be better if you start a series of short lectures upto 30 min in which you can describe each and every aspect of a particular topic.
    i am telling you this because i feel you have a good art of teaching..
    of course that will take time but i think you should forget about the nearest exam and think about those who has to serve for long...
    descriptive topics make a person to gain real knowledge...

    • @AllBoutChemistry
      @AllBoutChemistry  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you for this detailed feedback, I'll definitely try to work on this.

  • @birkishoremahto1764
    @birkishoremahto1764 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Provide lec. on variation and perturbation theorem

  • @abdulrauffaiq
    @abdulrauffaiq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks all about your vedios that I need more vedios about quantum chemistry.
    I am a student the physical chemistry at Kurdistan UUnivesity in Iran.
    Then I totally need a bout quantum chemistry.
    Please make a more vedio a bout quantum chemistry by numbering.

  • @sumanmondal6598
    @sumanmondal6598 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you so much sir.... Waiting for more videos for upcoming CSIR NET exam...

  • @bhoopsingh153
    @bhoopsingh153 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm a physics student but this is very useful for me

  • @sunitasingh-fz3wg
    @sunitasingh-fz3wg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aab Jake samj aya....thnx a lot sir

  • @chemikamesh4788
    @chemikamesh4788 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Super.....
    If u have time means, Go-ahead with variation theorem, perturbation....

    • @AllBoutChemistry
      @AllBoutChemistry  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sure, I'll try to make videos on them too

  • @aabidhamid5889
    @aabidhamid5889 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir please upload more videos on Quantum Chemistry, Ionic Equilbria and Data analysis. Thanks a lot sir.

    • @AllBoutChemistry
      @AllBoutChemistry  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ya sure I'll try to make videos on them too.

  • @villageyoutubefact9611
    @villageyoutubefact9611 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really u r my god...

  • @angelriyavarghese5863
    @angelriyavarghese5863 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sir can you make a class on hydrogen atom and related questions of quantum mechanics. If you teach ,the difficult topic even become easy.

  • @ShivamModiOfficial
    @ShivamModiOfficial 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    when we got where ms=0; so why we only add? why cant we subtract?

  • @nehanishad4231
    @nehanishad4231 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks you. Plz make more video important for June net exam. I also follow in unacadmy.

  • @chintadasatyavathi4960
    @chintadasatyavathi4960 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very nice sir thankyou so much happy to see your lecture

  • @lookaway8496
    @lookaway8496 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the difference between Slater determinant and secular determinants?

  • @chakrapanipani2912
    @chakrapanipani2912 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir make a full video on quantum chemistry. Because most of organic students facing difficulties in this

  • @karandoda1835
    @karandoda1835 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    22.30 why we cant subtract? it is also a solution??

  • @keyapal9334
    @keyapal9334 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pls make video on huckel determinant and delocalisation energy..

  • @dishasingh5244
    @dishasingh5244 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir june 12 Question me addition kyu hua h substraction kyu ni hua???

  • @khesalafzal9242
    @khesalafzal9242 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you. Clear 🙏🏻

  • @Daisy-zz1tt
    @Daisy-zz1tt 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir

  • @samitadutta97
    @samitadutta97 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kal k exam may slaters determinate ki ans kya hoga?

  • @岡安一壽-g2y
    @岡安一壽-g2y 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello sir. Generally, Slaters Determinant (the anti-symmetric wave function) is not the eigenfunction of the system.
    Example. Please suppose the system composed of two electrons.
    Electron 1 is in a hydrogen atom. Electron 2 is in a helium ion He+.
    rA, rB : the position of each nucleus. The two electrons are far enough.
    H1=(p1^2/2m)-(e^2/4πε0❘r1-rA❘), H2=(p2^2/2m)-(2e^2/4πε0❘r2-rB❘),
    H1φA(r1)=EAφA(r1), H2φB(r2)=EBφB(r2).
    Hartree productφA(r1)φB(r2) is the eigenfunction of operator H1+H2,
    and lead us the energy of the system EA+EB.
    But, another productφA(r2)φB(r1) is not the eigenfunction of operator H1+H2.
    (Please calculate it. It's very easy.)
    Therefore, the anti-symmetric wave function ψ=φA(r1)φB(r2)-φA(r2)φB(r1) is not the eigenfunction of the system.

  • @nittansingh7545
    @nittansingh7545 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir plzzz mention important topics from quantum chemistry

  • @MASChemistry
    @MASChemistry 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome..

  • @birkishoremahto1764
    @birkishoremahto1764 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks sir

  • @piccsirnetchemistry2433
    @piccsirnetchemistry2433 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Make more video on quantum sir

  • @Ayush-cs5tw
    @Ayush-cs5tw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why option D even though it is symmetric.

  • @rosa-fr5fo
    @rosa-fr5fo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks sir ..☺

  • @sumansarkar8017
    @sumansarkar8017 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the june12 ques why not opt b?

  • @deekshasaini9607
    @deekshasaini9607 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir plz upload more questions...

  • @aswanipv7919
    @aswanipv7919 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    👌explanation sir

  • @abineshkrishnan843
    @abineshkrishnan843 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please pass some references book...

  • @angelriyavarghese5863
    @angelriyavarghese5863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 21:55 in the first question as it is given ms=0 as well as triplet state it is confusing

  • @gauravjyotid.kalita3417
    @gauravjyotid.kalita3417 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir if we see the spin parts of the wave functions with spins ms = 0, we took the sum i. e. (Alpha 1beta 2 + beta 1 alpha 2), my question is why didn't we take the difference, i. e.( Alpha1beta2 - beta 1alpha2), because negative part is anti symmetric and positive part is symmetric and both are indistinguishable after finding their linear combination, which naturally gives a constructive and destructive wave function, constructive for plus spin part and destructive for minus spin part. So, being antisymmetric, the negative part was in a better position to be the answer, please clarify Sir?

    • @akb0014
      @akb0014 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because orbital part is antisymmetric due to presence of one g and one u.. So over all u

    • @gauravjyotid.kalita3417
      @gauravjyotid.kalita3417 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@akb0014 thank you I got it

  • @poojajoshi2014
    @poojajoshi2014 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir☺️

  • @AGCHEMBYABHISHEKGOYAL
    @AGCHEMBYABHISHEKGOYAL 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ms= 0 is in singlet state n sir

  • @prateekahuja5086
    @prateekahuja5086 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Respected Sir, at 25:13 the selected term doesn't represent triplet state and you misunderstood ms=0 with (2S+1=0). Both are different. ms is related to orbital angular momentum where as 2S+1 is purely dependent on total spin of the electrons present in the system. According to me the correct ans should be c

  • @aabidhamid5889
    @aabidhamid5889 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear Sir, Can you please make video on main group elements.... Important topics. Thanks in advance.

  • @pallavjyotiarandhara
    @pallavjyotiarandhara 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please tell me the expected cut off for CSIR NET dec 2018

  • @hemlatabhatt2865
    @hemlatabhatt2865 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isme 25.15minute m hm subtraction wala combination kyu nhi le rhe,,,, please ans

    • @gauravjyotid.kalita3417
      @gauravjyotid.kalita3417 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      My question is same, why not the subtraction part, because it is antisymmetric so it has more chance to be the answer