Stephen Sestanovich, "American Foreign Policy in Historical Perspective"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 มิ.ย. 2024
  • "American Foreign Policy in Historical Perspective"
    Speaker: Prof. Stephen Sestanovich
    Date: October 1, 2007
    Course number: U6800
    Course title: Conceptual Foundations of International Politics
    School: School of International and Public Affairs

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @straborn
    @straborn 14 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A great and insightful lecture

  • @zamkhanthang9103
    @zamkhanthang9103 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks

  • @thinker1830
    @thinker1830 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    fantastic critiques of Mearsheimer and Walt

  • @adamismail9137
    @adamismail9137 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What ever when ever I am proud by American

  • @SuperNerd707
    @SuperNerd707 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting that this talk was in 2009, given all that has happened since then

    • @margaretheitz7428
      @margaretheitz7428 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      wasn't it given in 2007? I thought I heard him mention a Global Warming article in "today's NYT "-- 10/07

  • @seanmatthewking
    @seanmatthewking ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why does 2007 look like 1987?

  • @moxin87
    @moxin87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I found the domestic policy section to be enlightening. But the rest was naive conventional wisdom. Democracy promotion in nearly every case has been subservient to perceived economic interests. Big oil more than anything else dominates our position in the middle east.

    • @moxin87
      @moxin87 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In other words, our sobs outnumber us backed democracies 10-1, especially outside of w europe.

  • @lathanlalane
    @lathanlalane 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    dannng how do i get that s/a war cheat sheet.

  • @josh4466
    @josh4466 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Stephen Colbert

  • @caribbeanqueen1389
    @caribbeanqueen1389 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Democratization leads to soft power... which is getting people to want what you want.

  • @caribbeanqueen1389
    @caribbeanqueen1389 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Multilatetalism doesn't work without a global arbiter.

    • @realistblue-_-136
      @realistblue-_-136 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ie the un imf wbo Cbo these global institutions are dedicated to make unilateral decisions the appear to be multilateral on the surface look to the countries that changes their entire economies so they can receive loans because they are third world countries these countries are essentially forced to bend the knee to these western value institutions that really don’t have a clue how detrimental these “adjustments” are

  • @janeeire2439
    @janeeire2439 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    15:40

  • @caribbeanqueen1389
    @caribbeanqueen1389 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The issue with multilaterslism is that it's not as simple as people think. It often leads to a paralysis in decision making and action. And whole Rome burns... the U.S. have been forced to take unilateral policy stances that some may deem problematic.

    • @maxheadrom3088
      @maxheadrom3088 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think he what he meant by multilateralism is domestic multilateralism.

  • @alexanderwalters7657
    @alexanderwalters7657 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    he lost me when he said egypt was in the middle east

    • @taihalpern7342
      @taihalpern7342 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I mean...it is

    • @ivanferraz8914
      @ivanferraz8914 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Maybe he was trying to explain about the relation of Egypt on Middle East. I believe that he knows that Egypt is located geographically in Africa, but it's geopolitical area of influence and interaction emcompasses North Africa and Middle East for sure.