European-Israeli Relations: Structural Problems

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • Dan Schueftan, Director of the National Security Studies Center at the University of Haifa, discussed the challenges of the European-Israeli relationship and the causes of the resentment and mistrust that exist on both sides.
    On April 17, 2014 the Middle East Program of the Woodrow Wilson Center hosted a discussion "European-Israeli Relations: Structural Problems" with Schueftan, also Goldman Visiting Professor, Department of Government, Georgetown University. Aaron David Miller, Vice President for New Initiatives and Distinguished Scholar at the Wilson Center, moderated the event.
    Miller introduced Schueftan as an "iconoclast" and opened the discussion by remarking that good policy is one that is always balanced between how the world is in reality, on the one hand, and how we want the world to be, on the other.
    Schueftan began his conversation by highlighting two positive points regarding the relationship between Europe and Israel, despite the existing rift. He noted that Israel has learned most of its values, which are shared and respected by the majority of Israelis, from Europe. Schueftan added that the bilateral relationships between European countries and Israel, including economic ties, are strong, and that most European countries are friendly or fair-minded about Israel. Schueftan explained that the problems that exist in European-Israeli relations are caused by "cultural differences." He noted that tensions arise as a result of the widespread influence of the European elite on the governments. Stressing that the "cultural element" is always underestimated, Schueftan compared Israel's relationship with Europe and Israel's relationship with the United States. Schueftan made this comparison in order to draw attention to the fact that he believes the "common ethos" shared by the United States and Israel is the reason why this relationship has remained strong despite an "unfriendly" administration.
    Schueftan explained the existing divergence between Israel and Europe due to genuine disagreement regarding policy and anti-Israeli sentiment in European countries. However, he maintained that the most important element of the tension lies in their differing philosophies. Schueftan noted that Israel believes in a disproportional deterrent force because it would not be able to exist without one. He said that Israel believes that deterrence has to be "disproportional" and "humiliating," not only to stop extremists but also to motivate moderates to convince their people to support their moderate policies by pointing to the consequences of radical actions. On the other hand, he pointed out that Europeans believe in an "international community," and the concept of proportionality lies "at the core of their identity." Another source of disagreement between the two parties, according to Schueftan, is Israel's reluctance to dialogue.
    In his closing remarks, Schueftan stressed that the option of "listening to Europeans" does not exist. He said he believes neither side will change their discourse, because neither side has the motivation to change their approach. Schueftan concluded that the only viable option that remains between Israel and Europe is "damage control."
    By the Middle East Program

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @johndoe-vc1we
    @johndoe-vc1we 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This discussion is very relevant today. How Israel & Europe perceive each other explains a lot.

  • @esthernebenzahl9270
    @esthernebenzahl9270 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Had I not confirmed that this lecture was given 10 years ago, I would have thought it was given today! Sad to realize that in 10 years nothing has changed.

  • @gigan5424
    @gigan5424 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    As a european I only can agree what he is saying.

  • @Giss.ivan1234
    @Giss.ivan1234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Brilliant

  • @hebreophone
    @hebreophone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    תענוג צרוף

  • @5994799
    @5994799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    אדיר

  • @sibusisoxayiya400
    @sibusisoxayiya400 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Genius 🫡👏

  • @lucsambourd1525
    @lucsambourd1525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    32:53 : When did the Europeans try to prevent Israel from having a defensive shield ?

    • @Coco-l9g
      @Coco-l9g 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It is the name of the operation that israel did in retaliation to the second palestinian intifada. Europe was against it but because of this operation there was about 98% reduction in terror attacks.

    • @trustnone6134
      @trustnone6134 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Coco-l9g RUBBISH

    • @dogbert52
      @dogbert52 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1973 war and practically every UN vote since 1948.

    • @atidfelixcastillo-najerala6891
      @atidfelixcastillo-najerala6891 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He is talking about opperation defensive shield, to bring down the second intifada

  • @sibusisoxayiya400
    @sibusisoxayiya400 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😂he predicted the future 😂😂

  • @antonioescala8570
    @antonioescala8570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Myself and many other Catalans share your opinions, our existentinal problem is similar though no identical to yours. You know perfectly what I mean. Why are you assisting and helping “Pegasus” the Spanish State to run over us….Why…What a disapointment.

  • @---wl3bi
    @---wl3bi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Truth is Israel gets everything it wants from Europe, this is just a smoke screen so people think the hammer is on Israel which effectively takes any criticism away. This guy is a racist ignorant fuckwit

    • @סיוןיונה-ת2ו
      @סיוןיונה-ת2ו 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You have got to be kidding me 😂 How many times have you Europe embargoed Israel?! Get your facts right 🧐😤

    • @jalemairliha
      @jalemairliha 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hahahahaha! deranged f*ckwit says what?

    • @johndoe-vc1we
      @johndoe-vc1we 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is no smokescreen. You only have to understand the interference Israel is facing from the US in Gaza.

    • @johndoe-vc1we
      @johndoe-vc1we 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I've recently become a fan of Dan Schueftan as I go through YT trying to find more of his talks. He speaks with an uncanny clarity.