She will probably start talking shit about her own lawyers. Lol no way to even try and help this woman. Everyone that's nice to her she stalks . Smh 😂😂
Agreed 1000%. Her not being convicted makes her look worse to me not better… that doesn’t make her innocent, just means she wasn’t punished for her crimes.. which is so disgusting in itself
You are totally right, it's amazing (not really) that she has had ZERO people speak up on her behalf, not even family. No former schoolmates, co-workers....nothing. I really hope we get the full story, and I hope she doesn't get a dime.
There certainly are laws now, I reported my own stalker, the police charged him and he was taken to court in Scotland. If she isn’t currently stalking someone then she is unlikely to be charged with stalking.
Spot on! When my stalker ramped things up a notch and the police were heavily involved, i swear the fear i was constantly living in, the lack of sleep, the living on adrenaline waiting for a space in a women's refuge to come up so i could move out of my home and relax, was detrimental to my health both mentally amd physically. I ended up so run down i developed an UTI which tracked into my kidneys and became Pylonephritis. I collapsed in front of the police, who were at my house, AGAIN, because of an incident with my stalker, and they had to call an ambulance out to me and i was rushed into hospital. I then had protection whilst seriously ill in hospital because my stalker found out (he had planted listening devices in my house which were found by the police) i was admitted and which hospital i went to. So yeah, the stress from these People can seriously make the victim ill.
Has there been any court hearings set over this case? Seeing the legal complaint it looks amateurish and I'm not sure if a Judge wouldn't just dismiss this case. Fiona outed herself.
Ok. This is the third time we’ve confirmed she stalked someone. Instead of entertaining her lawsuit why isn’t she in jail? She’s a serial stalker with a confirmed pattern. Instead of profiting off of this she should be prosecuted.
Janey Godley and Kier Starter also have had issues with Fiona. May not have been as severe on the stalker front as Richard, Laura and now Galloway 🤷 but they still had issues with the woman that went above and beyond normal levels of interest.
The whole “Fiona Harvey supporter “ group is her. Every account that comments is created post March 2024 and uses the word “wee” a lot, as in, “the wee lad”. It’s bonkers.
OMGGGG I BELIEVE THAT!! She’s digging her own grave!! Don’t worry it’s not a ☠️threat, I’m just being “hyper-BOWL-ickkkkk” (her word Lolol…and pronunciation lol)
The fact whether she was convicted or not matters in the legal case. That’s why pierce morgan keeps mentioning it. The case is not about whether she stalked someone but whether she was defamed.
I have a CBT check that says I don't have a criminal record, I been to prison loads of times, and had a massive rap sheet. Do her argument is invalid 😂😂
George Galloway was on big brother, he was hilarious btw he’s a great speaker maybe a bit of an attention seeker, he’s not famous for being the most respected politician on the country, but we all know this is 100000% true here. There should be stricter laws, if you ask someone to leave you alone and they don’t, you should be able to legally make them.
Piers is really pissing me off re: Fiona who btw is the one that CONFIRMED HER IDENTITY before the world on Piers Morgan. It would have otherwise dwindled away.
I just got passed being stalked for almost 6 years. Yes. Its not a healthy thing. Still trying to lose 20 pounds. Its also expensive with the extra security cameras, defense weapens, etc...
@@johngilmore697I think she might be trying to say she’s just gotten past being a victim of stalking and I’m assuming she gained weight from the stress and is trying to lose it and is saying that being a victim is expensive having to buy cameras and personal protection items
@@Jeanninecomeau It's absolutely not obvious what you wrote, "I just got passed being stalked for almost 6 years", is a bizarre sentence construction. I was stalked for 6 years is a simple and comprehensible way to phrase that. Maybe English is not your first language.
Gary, I totally agree with all you say on the legality of points - there is a BUT, though. The law in the UK and probably the US too is an ass and the technicalitites that are considered when deciding if someone is 'guilty' of something are a joke and to me more than often seem to want to ignore truth and facts that would help a jury make decisions. Another thing we keep hearing in legal cases is how UNIMPORTANT a past fact about someone is, to the case in hand. So, for example, let's say a guy is accussed of raping a woman and in the past had been accussed of this with also but he was never found guilty. The prosecution lawyer isn't allowed to mention this because as the guy wasn't found guilty it's considered irrelevant to the present case! [I disagree with this but that's how it goes.] Now, our unique Fiona Harvey, if we are to believe all the stuff that's being thrown at us, has had one Interim Interdick served on her by Laura Wray and that's it! She was never charged legally with stalking anyone or sentenced to jail - and THAT is what's her case with Netflix is based on. Her lawyer will no doubt say that everything else is irrelevant!
Her lawyer already has. They're not interested in all her other victims, just Netflix, but I don't know how they will win her case. The show's end credits say that the programme "is based on real events: however certain characters, names, incidents, locations, and dialogue have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes. Then she went & Outed herself on Piers Morgan 🙄
I dont think Piers Morgan is defending her, I think hes just hightlighting the arguments her lawyer will use in the civil trial, which will be based around the "True Story" statement at the beginning of the episodes, I know they have a "based around" disclaimer in the end credits but unfortunately Netflix may find themselves in a bind around what the average viewer would have been reasonably assumed were factual events (ie: the assault, the conviction etc) that were not factual. I'm personally team Richard but the legal system is not always the "justice" system.
i watched 'baby reindeer' and it was perfectly obvious that he provoked and asked for exactly what she did. he led her on, spied on her in her home, and used her mental illness as a form of personal entertainment. he went back over and over for every bit of 'abuse' he got from anyone who was willing to give it to him. he was not innocent. he is quite a psychotic idiot, as a matter of fact.
Right, but she is never named. She outed herself. She simultaneously claims that she barely knew him and rarely spoke to him, AND that she is the stalker the show is portraying. Make it make sense.
@@Gary828 that's not how it works. all you have to do is give enough obvious clues about who you're defaming, for it to be defamation. you don't have to say their name. that is a myth.
Not sure if I believe this particular dude. He smiles too much when he talks about her. Of course guys treat women stalkers differently so maybe that's what it is. What about the other guy who she called child services on?
@@fozzydare7987 yes and very credible. He wouldn't say something like this on an international YT platform if it wasn't his experience. He doesn't need 15 minutes of fame. I think he's adding his voice of experience to this to highlight Fiona's character.
@@sophieglatzTHANK YOU! Besides why do people complain when they can just click on another video? Ridiculous. It’s giving Fiona Harvey vibes Lolol to complain ad nauseum and act like the complaint is more important than the topic at hand. Lord have mercy some people are exhausting!
Hey Gara828! Let me start by saying how much I have been enjoying your coverage of this issue. It has been fascinating to watch how you went meticulously through her own Facebook posts to expose lies and deception. I think you would make an incredible private investigator. On the issue of the law. I am a lawyer from Jamaica and our laws are modeled after the UK legal system. This is also similar to American law, so what I can tell you is the Fiona is going to win on the substantive issues of her case. She definitely wants this to go to trial and she is going to win in my opinion. Here’a why. The courts won’t care that she is a horrible stalker and deserves to have gone to jail a dozen times over. The only thing her lawyer has to do is show the court that message at the beginning of the series where is says, ‘this is a true story.’ Then Show the court scene where the actress playing Fiona confesses and goes to jail. Lastly they will show the court proof that the real Fiona never went to jail and was never charged a thing. Done!that’s all the judge really will care about. That proves that Netflix lied. Fiona wins just like that. Then onto damages. The court will look at the series damaged her life and the mental or other toll it took on her. Also the judge will likely want to punish Netflix for portraying her as a criminal when she was never convicted. It doesn’t matter that she should have gone to jail. She didn’t go to jail. I think she is going to win millions of dollars. I agree that she will likely loose some of it on defamation law suits and possibly other cases as people she harassed in the past come out the wood work. But I have no doubt that Fiona will defeat Netflix on this. It’s a slam dunk case.
@@kittykatz3518 when the trial is over let’s come back to this comment and if Fiona loses the case, I will happily declare that you have the superior legal mind
He has to keep saying she has never been convicted if for no other reason but to make sure HIS show doesn't end up liable, no one is saying she isn't guilty of being a stalker, they are merely saying Netflix called her a CONVICTED stalker when she is not. Imagine comparing that to a serial killer...ridiculous statement.
The case is about whether or not shes been a convicted stalker, not about whether she has stalked people. Thats why Morgan keeps bringing it up. Theres no arguing shes crazy, she just never went to jail for it, sadly. From a legal perspective, she does have a case unless legal documents says otherwise
@Neon no, that was a hoax; he made that video in jest, thinking it'd probably get a few chuckles, but then it went viral, and he admitted he was just trolling for fun, and didn't expect it to spread like that.
She’s insane, but it does matter if she’s been to prison because they put this is a true story at the beginning and not based on a true story, which was hidden at end credits but that can be argued people didn’t see it. I honestly am disgusted by her and feel 0 sympathy, but they messed up by putting the jail part in if it’s not true. Her supposed nephew said she did go but for 4 months and not 9 I don’t know why no one’s confirmed it’s her nephew then interviewed him.
that was a prank; the boy was trolling that Fiona was his aunt b/c they had the same last name. if he really was her nephew, Piers would have had him on by now!!! lol.
@@nicolawalker6402 Hi Nicola.....As he's a politician,by default I wouldn't trust anything he or any other politicians say unfortunately. If I remember correctly he was trying to "impress" Rula Lenska but it was many moons ago 😉 I think the whole nation has an interesting week ahead and definitely an interesting end to 2024🤔🇬🇧
I'm not saying she's innocent or a good person or anything but George Galloway went on live TV and creeped everyone out by role playing an overtly sexual cat. I believe he'd say ANYTHING to get his face in front of a camera.
If she makes a DIME from Netflix her past victims are going to be lining up to sue her lying behind 😅
I think Fiona's attorneys will quit.
lol funny bc it’s true
She will probably start talking shit about her own lawyers. Lol no way to even try and help this woman. Everyone that's nice to her she stalks . Smh 😂😂
@@Emily-jo7jn lol also funny bc it’s true 🤣
Agreed 1000%. Her not being convicted makes her look worse to me not better… that doesn’t make her innocent, just means she wasn’t punished for her crimes.. which is so disgusting in itself
You are totally right, it's amazing (not really) that she has had ZERO people speak up on her behalf, not even family. No former schoolmates, co-workers....nothing. I really hope we get the full story, and I hope she doesn't get a dime.
Honestly I think Fiona's attorneys will quit the case.
She's far from the perfect "victim"
lol that would be funny
There certainly are laws now, I reported my own stalker, the police charged him and he was taken to court in Scotland. If she isn’t currently stalking someone then she is unlikely to be charged with stalking.
Spot on! When my stalker ramped things up a notch and the police were heavily involved, i swear the fear i was constantly living in, the lack of sleep, the living on adrenaline waiting for a space in a women's refuge to come up so i could move out of my home and relax, was detrimental to my health both mentally amd physically. I ended up so run down i developed an UTI which tracked into my kidneys and became Pylonephritis. I collapsed in front of the police, who were at my house, AGAIN, because of an incident with my stalker, and they had to call an ambulance out to me and i was rushed into hospital. I then had protection whilst seriously ill in hospital because my stalker found out (he had planted listening devices in my house which were found by the police) i was admitted and which hospital i went to.
So yeah, the stress from these People can seriously make the victim ill.
Has there been any court hearings set over this case?
Seeing the legal complaint it looks amateurish and I'm not sure if a Judge wouldn't just dismiss this case.
Fiona outed herself.
I totally agree
Ok. This is the third time we’ve confirmed she stalked someone. Instead of entertaining her lawsuit why isn’t she in jail? She’s a serial stalker with a confirmed pattern. Instead of profiting off of this she should be prosecuted.
I think the story is secondary now to the amount of money involved in the lawsuits🤔🇬🇧
Exactly, maybe the laws can change now they see the damage a stalker can do !!
Janey Godley and Kier Starter also have had issues with Fiona. May not have been as severe on the stalker front as Richard, Laura and now Galloway 🤷 but they still had issues with the woman that went above and beyond normal levels of interest.
Piers Morgan is in his glory. When he first interviewed Fiona Harvey he didn't realize he had struck a goldmine.
The whole “Fiona Harvey supporter “ group is her. Every account that comments is created post March 2024 and uses the word “wee” a lot, as in, “the wee lad”. It’s bonkers.
OMGGGG I BELIEVE THAT!! She’s digging her own grave!! Don’t worry it’s not a ☠️threat, I’m just being “hyper-BOWL-ickkkkk” (her word Lolol…and pronunciation lol)
Stalking for over 40 years now!!!Someone needs to stop her now!!!
Holy crap I didn’t even do the math on that…. That’s freaking insane. And the fact she’s suing shows she doesn’t feel she did anything wrong
The fact whether she was convicted or not matters in the legal case. That’s why pierce morgan keeps mentioning it. The case is not about whether she stalked someone but whether she was defamed.
Sadly, yeh. See my post.
I particularly like when she said: “I don’t lie.”
Exactly always avoid people who say they “don’t lie”
'No idea it was her' Netflix could use him
The real question shouldn’t be If she was convicted or not, the real one is Why she was not?
????
I have a CBT check that says I don't have a criminal record, I been to prison loads of times, and had a massive rap sheet. Do her argument is invalid 😂😂
Thanks for sharing this information
George Galloway was on big brother, he was hilarious btw he’s a great speaker maybe a bit of an attention seeker, he’s not famous for being the most respected politician on the country, but we all know this is 100000% true here. There should be stricter laws, if you ask someone to leave you alone and they don’t, you should be able to legally make them.
He is also underestimated as an incredibly intelligent guy, not that I am a fan 😊
I wonder how many times she has called Piers Morgan and asked him to hang her curtains 😅
🤣
Simple, all come forward, take her to court for stalking, she gets convicted = Netflix true story!!
Piers has to say she hasn’t been to court/jail to protect himself.
Heather Burns says “she’s a convicted stalker”
Piers is really pissing me off re: Fiona who btw is the one that CONFIRMED HER IDENTITY before the world on Piers Morgan. It would have otherwise dwindled away.
Yes I agree
I wonder about the mental clinic she'd supposedly attended and a similar stalking claim. Any info?
Heather Burns has a blog about working as a temp typist at a facility where Fiona became obsessed with her for a period.
Google Heather Burns/ Fiona Muir . Someone else who alleged she had a similar but thankfully similar, short lived "encounter" with her.
P.M. keeps saying that strickly to keep himself out of the line of fire, remember she said she was suing him, as well.
I just got passed being stalked for almost 6 years. Yes. Its not a healthy thing. Still trying to lose 20 pounds. Its also expensive with the extra security cameras, defense weapens, etc...
What are you babbling about?
@@johngilmore697I think she might be trying to say she’s just gotten past being a victim of stalking and I’m assuming she gained weight from the stress and is trying to lose it and is saying that being a victim is expensive having to buy cameras and personal protection items
@@johngilmore697 Apparently reading comprehension isn't your forte.
@@EarthaClit88 Thank you! I mean, what I said is obvious.
@@Jeanninecomeau It's absolutely not obvious what you wrote, "I just got passed being stalked for almost 6 years", is a bizarre sentence construction. I was stalked for 6 years is a simple and comprehensible way to phrase that. Maybe English is not your first language.
Gary, I totally agree with all you say on the legality of points - there is a BUT, though. The law in the UK and probably the US too is an ass and the technicalitites that are considered when deciding if someone is 'guilty' of something are a joke and to me more than often seem to want to ignore truth and facts that would help a jury make decisions. Another thing we keep hearing in legal cases is how UNIMPORTANT a past fact about someone is, to the case in hand. So, for example, let's say a guy is accussed of raping a woman and in the past had been accussed of this with also but he was never found guilty. The prosecution lawyer isn't allowed to mention this because as the guy wasn't found guilty it's considered irrelevant to the present case! [I disagree with this but that's how it goes.] Now, our unique Fiona Harvey, if we are to believe all the stuff that's being thrown at us, has had one Interim Interdick served on her by Laura Wray and that's it! She was never charged legally with stalking anyone or sentenced to jail - and THAT is what's her case with Netflix is based on. Her lawyer will no doubt say that everything else is irrelevant!
Her lawyer already has. They're not interested in all her other victims, just Netflix, but I don't know how they will win her case. The show's end credits say that the programme "is based on real events: however certain characters, names, incidents, locations, and dialogue have been fictionalized for dramatic purposes. Then she went & Outed herself on Piers Morgan 🙄
@@Leesa111_0 She cannot win. Can you imagine?!
@drziggyabdelmalak1439 I dread to think😬
There cases in the UK currently where people are on trial for stalking without actually harming people .
Piers cares because he hasn't been convicted of phone hacking.
It would be pure karma if Fiona turned her stalking behaviour on Piers
If this woman stalked Galloway she really does have mh issues
Can anyone create a timeline please? This is getting interesting 🤨
1000BC…………………..200AD…………………1475AD…………………2024AD
@@shaunteasdale6613 😂😂
Check out these former victims
Donald Dewar
Rob McDowall
Heather Burns
I dont think Piers Morgan is defending her, I think hes just hightlighting the arguments her lawyer will use in the civil trial, which will be based around the "True Story" statement at the beginning of the episodes, I know they have a "based around" disclaimer in the end credits but unfortunately Netflix may find themselves in a bind around what the average viewer would have been reasonably assumed were factual events (ie: the assault, the conviction etc) that were not factual. I'm personally team Richard but the legal system is not always the "justice" system.
Trust George Galloway to get in on the act.
We all know it isn’t an act, Fiona. Only in your fantasies. You’re a very dangerous person. You ought to just stop.
It has been reported to be true…
What if she stalks Piers Morgan next?
Doubt she would considering he was nice and impartial
She stalked me
Sent from iphone
Plot twist.
i watched 'baby reindeer' and it was perfectly obvious that he provoked and asked for exactly what she did. he led her on, spied on her in her home, and used her mental illness as a form of personal entertainment. he went back over and over for every bit of 'abuse' he got from anyone who was willing to give it to him. he was not innocent. he is quite a psychotic idiot, as a matter of fact.
It's defamation per se to claim she was convicted.
yeah, except they never metioned her name.
Right, but she is never named. She outed herself. She simultaneously claims that she barely knew him and rarely spoke to him, AND that she is the stalker the show is portraying. Make it make sense.
@@Gary828 that's not how it works. all you have to do is give enough obvious clues about who you're defaming, for it to be defamation. you don't have to say their name. that is a myth.
Ok, you keep saying there should be laws against stalking. How do you do that?
Like America did? We have stalker laws... Basically you can't follow or harass ppl... just like how you can't rape ppl
Not sure if I believe this particular dude. He smiles too much when he talks about her. Of course guys treat women stalkers differently so maybe that's what it is. What about the other guy who she called child services on?
He’s a well known Scot and Politician - that smile is very characteristic of his mannerisms
Donald Dewar (accused of abusing his child by her)
Heather Burns
Rob McDowall
@@fozzydare7987 yes and very credible. He wouldn't say something like this on an international YT platform if it wasn't his experience. He doesn't need 15 minutes of fame. I think he's adding his voice of experience to this to highlight Fiona's character.
He smiles 😅bc this situation is laughable bc Fiona is a joke and crazy person.
Just play the clip and stop interupting for gods sake
He can’t it has to be fair use transformative or it will get taken down this is a commentary channel
@@sophieglatzTHANK YOU! Besides why do people complain when they can just click on another video? Ridiculous. It’s giving Fiona Harvey vibes Lolol to complain ad nauseum and act like the complaint is more important than the topic at hand. Lord have mercy some people are exhausting!
Hey Gara828! Let me start by saying how much I have been enjoying your coverage of this issue. It has been fascinating to watch how you went meticulously through her own Facebook posts to expose lies and deception. I think you would make an incredible private investigator. On the issue of the law. I am a lawyer from Jamaica and our laws are modeled after the UK legal system. This is also similar to American law, so what I can tell you is the Fiona is going to win on the substantive issues of her case. She definitely wants this to go to trial and she is going to win in my opinion. Here’a why. The courts won’t care that she is a horrible stalker and deserves to have gone to jail a dozen times over. The only thing her lawyer has to do is show the court that message at the beginning of the series where is says, ‘this is a true story.’ Then Show the court scene where the actress playing Fiona confesses and goes to jail. Lastly they will show the court proof that the real Fiona never went to jail and was never charged a thing. Done!that’s all the judge really will care about. That proves that Netflix lied. Fiona wins just like that. Then onto damages. The court will look at the series damaged her life and the mental or other toll it took on her. Also the judge will likely want to punish Netflix for portraying her as a criminal when she was never convicted. It doesn’t matter that she should have gone to jail. She didn’t go to jail. I think she is going to win millions of dollars. I agree that she will likely loose some of it on defamation law suits and possibly other cases as people she harassed in the past come out the wood work. But I have no doubt that Fiona will defeat Netflix on this. It’s a slam dunk case.
😂😂😂 From a real American litigator.
@@kittykatz3518 let’s see what happens at the trial 😊
@@kittykatz3518 when the trial is over let’s come back to this comment and if Fiona loses the case, I will happily declare that you have the superior legal mind
Interesting !
& Netflix will claim it is Donny’s true story ..... which is fiction
Perfect Scottish accent on this one.
Totally agree
He has to keep saying she has never been convicted if for no other reason but to make sure HIS show doesn't end up liable, no one is saying she isn't guilty of being a stalker, they are merely saying Netflix called her a CONVICTED stalker when she is not. Imagine comparing that to a serial killer...ridiculous statement.
The law failed everyone that some that have been stalking some that have been killed and some that have survived from it
WHAT !
The case is about whether or not shes been a convicted stalker, not about whether she has stalked people. Thats why Morgan keeps bringing it up. Theres no arguing shes crazy, she just never went to jail for it, sadly. From a legal perspective, she does have a case unless legal documents says otherwise
Yes, it is what Netflix is claiming to be true, and it isn't, therefore it is defamatory.
@@mindingthegaps Never has Netflix claimed she was a convicted stalker. They claimed a fictional character was.
So you really think this thoroughly sick demented woman should be rewarded?!
Her nephew has just come out and said she did prison time
@Neon no, that was a hoax; he made that video in jest, thinking it'd probably get a few chuckles, but then it went viral, and he admitted he was just trolling for fun, and didn't expect it to spread like that.
its pronounced glazgo, not glassgo.
Love that city. Miss it so much.
She’s insane, but it does matter if she’s been to prison because they put this is a true story at the beginning and not based on a true story, which was hidden at end credits but that can be argued people didn’t see it. I honestly am disgusted by her and feel 0 sympathy, but they messed up by putting the jail part in if it’s not true. Her supposed nephew said she did go but for 4 months and not 9 I don’t know why no one’s confirmed it’s her nephew then interviewed him.
that was a prank; the boy was trolling that Fiona was his aunt b/c they had the same last name. if he really was her nephew, Piers would have had him on by now!!! lol.
God bless you in the name of Jesus Christ, who is the only way to Heaven❤
Not if he's promoting antisemites like Galloway. Jesus. Do your homework.
WTF has that got to do with ANYTHING?!
@@kittykatz3518whatever FIONA 🤡
@@drziggyabdelmalak1439 christians are always tying to insert their myths into everything .
I cant take George seriously. He pretended to be cat on Big Brother.
Meowed and everything.
I would take what George Galloway says with a grain of salt
I think he prefers a saucer of milk judging by his celebrity big brother appearance 🤣🤣🇬🇧
@@johnmccann5104 I was going to mention it to him to Google that 🤣🤣 yeah he’s a bit of a joke in Scotland, actually the whole of the UK 🤣
@@nicolawalker6402 Hi Nicola.....As he's a politician,by default I wouldn't trust anything he or any other politicians say unfortunately.
If I remember correctly he was trying to "impress" Rula Lenska but it was many moons ago 😉
I think the whole nation has an interesting week ahead and definitely an interesting end to 2024🤔🇬🇧
@@nicolawalker6402honestly he seems to be making a come back. He seems to be winning peoples votes and back being an MP.
@@CeCe-xv1frlook where he's MP
I'm not saying she's innocent or a good person or anything but George Galloway went on live TV and creeped everyone out by role playing an overtly sexual cat. I believe he'd say ANYTHING to get his face in front of a camera.
I'd believe him over Fiona any day. He's ready to testify.
There will be many who can testify for him because she was present in numerous events where he was.
@@billthecat666 💯
Galloway is a melter 😂
You “can” call police…….they don’t always help like you think they should. Even with evidence