The judgement of sc in shah bano case was one of the most revolutionary judgement and the way rajiv gandhi overturned the decision to please their muslim vote bank was one of the weakest decision. If rajiv gandhi had taken this judgement rationally, it would have led to UCC.
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
Shah bano was right, if she's not earning or being supported by mahram, ex husbands has to give alimony to her and children also, its must. Moreover second marriage is not a sweet, it's only done when there's a logical need, like much higher female( divorced, widowed) than male
@@shivasingh-jd1zx my sister is pursuing PHD from IIT. she herself is capable enough to run a house on her own. If it happens with my mother. Than I and my sister will support her, as per islam rules a daughter has right to property of her father. So my mother has some portion of her father's home on her name. Follow islam completely than only you will understand its beauty.
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
@@akbaba007 suno be agr jis wife ko aapne divorce diya h vo job nhi krti h aur koi earning nhi h toh aapko usko apne bachon ko maintainance dena padega but in case women is earning then uska koi khrcha nhi dena hoga bs bachon ki maintaince deni pdti h .
Ohhh, Celebration Killing of People in India, Mocking Deaths, Garlanding Culprits of Police Killers, and Mob Lynchers is Example of Nationalists Governments in Independent India?
@@Malik_are_Kings What is your problem mate? Do you come from the same Extremist Orthodox section of Muslims who still think their appeasement is the only type of Secularism India can have?
@@Malik_are_Kings Yes! Why not! Right from the beginning of Gandhian era in Congress, this story of appeasement started. It was the last time in 1857 during which Hindus and Muslims of India get unified fought against British. But after that Sir Syed Ahmed Khan felt that Muslims suffered too much by fighting with British and he advocated for British education for Muslims and their allegiance to British Government for a better future as a community. Now, Majority of Muslims had lost interest in India's freedom struggle. Mr. Gandhi wanted the support of Muslims in Freedom struggle and to garner that he started the policy of "Muslim Appeasement", i.e. supporting the religious beliefs of Muslims to drive them towards freedom movement. He supported "Khilafat Movement" and in turn "Moplah Massacre" in Kerala which was linked to Turkish Khalifa and had no relation with India. This step widened the gap between Hindus and Muslims since Indian Muslims were less concerned about their own nation but more concerned for Turkic Khalifa. This step also fuelled the concept of "Ummah" which further alienated Indian Muslims from the emotion of "Nationalism". The appeasement of India's Muslims continued even after freedom. Congress and other parties did it to create a vote bank for them. Over the years due to this Hindus started feeling alienated and it resulted in "Rise of Hindutva politics" in India. This appeasement policy gave nothing to Muslims in society. There were absolutely no reforms. Aged old bad practices remained prevalent in Islamic Society of India which have been even banned in Muslim Countries like Saudi, due to absence of reforms and appeasement of Orthodox section of Muslims. Progressive Islamic leaders like Aarif Mohammad Khan were side lined.
Wrong. No man make rule book for another man only creater has this right to impose laws on his creations. Only humans should have executive and judiciary because legislation can't be done by one set of community for rest of the human beings. They should (Government) only look after execution of that legislature and award/punish accordingly.
All india muslim personal law board (AIMPLB) was formed during british raj by some elit class Muslim ulema belongs to UP and Delhi. They felt that they are the guardian of entire Muslim community of the undivided india and and made the sharia law according to their convenience but not as per the guidance of the holi quran Now it is managed by the same family and their friends and represent tha face of indian muslim. The present generation of this body still belives that they are living in Mughal era and not ready to accept the fact that their family cheated the Muslim community for political support. The Muslim personal law must be modified as the guideline of quran and body must not be a family business of some elit families of delhi and UP.
are u really a muslim? there's no reply like this here😂 but yeah whoever says something ideal,others start asking if he's really a muslim or not. & this should change
@@hunter10348yes,I am an educated proud indian muslim. Muslim personal law is represented by some elite Muslim since british period and gets political patronizing from generation to generation. Therefore, they never change their stand only to make the community feel that they are the guardian of the entire Muslim community of India.
@@rohitchauhan2355 in this multi culture and religion community - there must be a personal law board for each religion and community. The laws must be formed based on their faith with the prospective of the modern society and religious beliefs. If the paries are not satisfied with their personal law the can approach to court of justice.
Ohh , first time i came to know this..! Thanks for giving such information..! You are rational n educated, the people like you should raise the voice against such so called elite class and lead the Muslim community of our country n torch bearer for them in right direction. God bless you...!
*Shah Bano Case Dispute : An Example of The Idiocy of The Indian Muslims* When Prime Minister Indira Gandhi made CrPC in 1973 and applied in 1974, then was not 'Islam In Danger'. The national election became in 1985 after the murder of Indira Gandhi. Congress had won more than 400 seats and BJP had won only 2 seats in the election. The Honorable Supreme Court ordered to pay maintenance to Shah Bano according CrPC, 125 in 1985 and Islam came in danger. Right wing AIMPLB and orthodoxy Islamists had opposed the verdict of the Supreme Court and Muslim society supported this a oppose idiotic. Finally Rajiv Gandhi government made Muslim Women Act, 1986 and applied. For the Rajiv Gandhi government was hard to deny Muslim women from fundamental right 'Equality before the law and equal protection of law' of article 14. The Rajiv Gandhi government keeps provision in section 5 of new act right to maintenance according CrPC 125 by declaration. The Right wing AIMPLB and the orthodoxy Islamists supportes new act. Now a question is, if a Muslim women may use provision in Muslim Women Act, 1986, Section 5 and may demand maintenance according CrPC, 125, then what did Shah Bano crime? She had demanded maintenance according CrPC, 125. In Short, the Shah Bano case dispute is an example of idiocy of the Muslim people of India. *Explanation* *Article 14-* The Constitution of India, Article 14.- The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. *CrPC 125-* The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 125 - (1) If any person having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain- (a) his wife, unable to maintain herself, a Magistrate of the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate not exceeding five hundred rupees in the whole, as such Magistrate thinks fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct: Provided that the Magistrate may order the father of a minor female child referred to in clause (b) to make such allowance, until she attains her majority, if the Magistrate is satisfied that the husband of such minor female child, if married, is not possessed of sufficient means. Explanation.- For the purposes of this Chapter,- (b) " wife" includes a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried. *Muslim Women Act, 1986 Section 5-* The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Divorce) Act, 1986, Section 5 - Option to be governed by the provisions of sections 125 to 128 of Act 2 of 1974. If on the date of the first hearing of the application under sub-section (2) of section 3, a divorced woman and her former husband declare, by affidavit or any other declaration in writing in such form as may be prescribed, either jointly or separately, that they would prefer to be governed by the provisions of sections 125 to 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and file such affidavit or declaration in the court hearing the application, the Magistrate shall dispose of such application accordingly. Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, "date of the first hearing of the application" means the date fixed in the summons for the attendance of the respondent to the application. *AIMIM-* All India Muslim Personal Law Board. Which is a right wing NGO. -Zenzo Kurita, Solapur, Maharashtra, India.
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
Islam maybe a great religion for those who follow...But the Muslim laws are terrible for women! I know many Muslim women are very happy that Ucc is getting implemented It will protect their lives, give them property right from parents and even get equal amount of property if she is divorced.. as in Hindu laws . UCC will be truly uplifting for Muslim women and her children..
@@laraibansari9077 i don't need to read ... Cases like Shahbano case Triple talaq Talaq e Hasan Halala 4 marriages. Burka, hijab are enough for me.. Cant digest more than that
@@laraibansari9077 It doesn't matter what Quran says about "Rights of Women", unless the Muslim Society interprets it rightly and implements it! The problem of Indian Muslim lies here only. Whenever questioned they suggest intellects to read "Quran" but they don't answer if they have really implemented the right interpretation of Quranic Verses into their society. Because if Quran is the word of Allah, then it's following must not result in chaos! So, I think there's a huge gap in applying the things in the society as written in Quran.
अगर कांग्रेस की नियत सही होती तो इस मामले को उस समय खत्म किया जा सकता था... लेकिन नरसिम्हा राव के इस कथन से नियत साफ हो जाती है कि अगर मुस्लिम गटर मे रहना चाहते है तो इसमें बुराई क्या है हम समाज सुधारक क्यों बने...
*शहाबानो मामला विवाद : भारतीय मुस्लिमों की मूर्खता की मिसाल* जब प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी इन्होने १९७३ में CrPC बनाया और १९७४ में लागू किया, तब 'इस्लाम खतरे में' नहीं था। इंदिरा गांधी की हत्या के बाद १९८५ में चुनाव हुए। चुनाव में काँग्रेस ने ४०० से ज्यादा सीटें जीती थी और भाजपा ने सिर्फ २ सीटें जीती थी। मा. उच्चतम न्यायालय ने १९८५ में शहाबानो को CrPC१२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता देने का आदेश दिया। इस आदेश से इस्लाम खतरे में आ गया। दक्षिणपंथीय मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड और सनातनी इस्लामवादीयों ने इस निर्णय का विरोध किया और मुस्लिम समाज ने इस विरोध का मूर्ख समर्थन किया। आखिरकार राजीव गांधी सरकार ने मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम, १९८६ बनाया और लागू किया। राजीव सरकार को अनुच्छेद १४ का 'कानून के सामने समानता और कानून की समान सुरक्षा' इस मौलिक अधिकार से मुस्लिम महिला को सीधे वंचित करना मुश्किल था। इसलिए राजीव गांधी सरकारने नये अधिनियम की धारा ५ में प्रावधान किया की मुस्लिम महिला घोषणापत्र द्वारा CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांग सकती है। इस अधिनियम का दक्षिणपंथीय मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड और सनातनी इस्लामवादीयों ने समर्थन किया। अब प्रश्न यह है कि अगर मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम १९८६, धारा ५ के अनुसार मुस्लिम महिला CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांग सकती है, तो शहाबानो ने क्या गुनाह किया था? शहाबानो ने CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांगा था। संक्षेप में, शहाबानो मामला विवाद भारतीय मुस्लिमों के मूर्खता की एक मिसाल है। *स्पष्टीकरण* *अनुच्छेद १४-* भारतीय संविधान अनुच्छेद १४ - राज्य, भारत के राज्यक्षेत्र में किसी व्यक्ति को विधि के समक्ष समता से या विधियों के सामान संरक्षण से वंचित नहीं करेगा। *CrPC, १२५-* दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, १९७३, धारा १२५ - (१) यदि पर्याप्त साधनों वाला कोई व्यक्ति (ए) अपनी पत्नी का, जो अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है, भरणपोषण करने में उपेक्षा करता है या भरणपोषण करने से इनकार करता है तो प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट, ऐसी उपेक्षा या इनकार के साबित हो जाने पर, ऐसे व्यक्ति को यह निदेश दे सकता है कि वह अपनी पत्नीके भरणपोषण के लि ऐसी मासिक दर पर, जिसे मजिस्ट्रेट ठीक समझे, मासिक भत्ता दे और उस भत्ते का संदाय ऐसे व्यक्ति को करे जिसको संदाय करने का मजिस्ट्रेट समय-समय पर निदेश दे। स्पष्टीकरण-इस अध्याय के प्रयोजनों के लिए (बी) “पत्नी के अंतर्गत ऐसी स्त्री भी है जिसके पति ने उससे विवाह-विच्छेद कर लिया है या जिसने अपने पति से विवाहविच्छेद कर लिया है और जिसने पुनर्विवाह नहीं किया है। *मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम, १९८६, धारा ५ -* मुस्लिम महिला (तलाक पर अधिकारी की सुरक्षा) अधिनियम, १९८६, धारा ५ - ५. १९७४ के अधिनियम २ की धारा१२५ से धारा १२८ तक के उपबंधों द्वारा शासित होने का विकल्प-यदि धारा ३ की उपधारा (२) के अधीन आवेदन की पहली सुनवाई की तारीख को विच्छिन्न विवाह स्त्री और उसका पूर्व पति शपथपत्र या किसी अन्य लिखित घोषणा द्वारा ऐसे प्ररूप में, जो विहित किया जाए, या तो संयुक्त रूप से या पृथक्तः, यह घोषित करते हैं कि वे दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, १९७३ (१९७४ का २) की धारा १२५ से धारा १२८ तक के उपबन्धों द्वारा शासित होना चाहते हैं और वे आवेदन की सुनवाई करने वाले न्यायालय में ऐसा शपथपत्र या घोषणा फाइल करते है, तो मजिस्ट्रेट ऐसे आवेदन को तदनुसार निपटाएगा । स्पष्टीकरण-इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, आवेदन की पहली सुनवाई की तारीख" से वह तारीख अभिप्रेत है जो आवेदन के प्रत्यर्थी की हाजिरी के लिए समन में नियत की गई है । *मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड-* ऑल इंडिया मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ बोर्ड (अखिल भारतीय मुस्लिम व्यक्तिगत कानून मंडल) यह एक दक्षिणपंथीय गैर-सरकारी संस्था है। - झेनझो कुरिटा, सोलापूर, महाराष्ट्र, भारत।
There is only one book that can rule over India. And that is Constitution. If someone thinks that there religious books are superior then constitution. They can leave the country.
ZIS JUDGE MISHRA N AYODHYA K KIWAD KHULWAE .USNE JUDGMENT M KHA KI JB USNE FAISLA SUNAYA TO USE KALA BANDER DIKHAE DIA ZO HNUMAN THA .ZISNE MUJE KHA KI TUM MANDIR K DWAR KHULWA DO .BTAO US DESH KA HAAL AAP DEKH SKTE HO JHA JUDGE MANSIK ROOP SE BIMAR HO
Some countries allows Personal Laws. Personal Laws deals with civil matters of a community pertaining to marriage, divorce and inheritance. There have been many debates on implementing Uniform Civil Code in India. Hindus say that they are not governed by any personal law but by secular laws of Indian constitution. Though some Hindu laws are codified such as the Hindu Marriage Act but inheritance law of Hindus called Mitakshara and Dayabhaga law is still followed by Hindus and it has legal backing. So it is inappropriate to say that Hindus do not follow personal law. They have their own form of personal law which is not discussed by any media. In some states like Haryana, Hindus believes in Khap Panchayat which is an assembly of village elders pronouncing punishment even in criminal matters. Though Khap Panchayat has no legal status but they are very influential and has emerged as a judicial body. The Hindu code bill faced severe opposition by Hindus who now claim that they happily accepted it and that they change with time. But that’s not true, the Hindu Code Bill was met with strong opposition from Hindu religious leaders and outfits, in 1949 RSS burned effigies of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as a protest against the Hindu Code Bill. The RSS hated Dr. Ambedkar to such an extent and now it is trying to appropriate Dr. Ambedkar to win hearts of Dalits and use them in riots. Hindus demanding Uniform Civil Code is nothing but a frustration against Muslims. They actually want to enforce their laws on Muslims. Other communities such as Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists are also governed by Hindu Marriage Act, had Muslims also followed Hindu Marriage Act then Hindus would not have raised the issue of implementing Uniform Civil Code. Why Hindus have been so intolerant towards those following their religion? Why Hindus are having problem if Muslims are following their religious laws in civil matters? In the future Hindus may also demand that Muslims must convert to Hinduism. After all I find little difference between enforcing religion and enforcing ones laws on others. How can Hindus demand to implement UCC without presenting a draft bill? Vice Chancellor of NALSAR Mr. Faizan Mustafa also said, “In 1941, a drafting committee comprising 8 members was formed under the chairmanship of (Jurist) B N Rao, that gave its report which was later debated, then a Hindu Code Bill was formed but it was not passed and compromised with Hindu Fundamentalists and diluted. Eventually Law Minister Dr B R Ambedkar had to resign over this. So even after 15 years exercise, government could not make a strong and reform law because daughter could not make copartner. That change government could bring in 2005. Still till today, Hindu laws have not been reformed and there are no uniform Hindu laws…So if government wants to bring reform in Muslim laws. It should make a committee of experts, wait for their report, open it for public debate then make any law.”
BHAI EK BAAT AAJ TAK SAMAJH MEIN NAHI AAYI KE AGAR MUSLIMS APNE KOI PROBLEM MUSLIM LAW KE KANOON KE HISAB SE SOLVE KAR LETE HAIN TO DOOSRE DHARM KE LOGO PAR IS KOI PROBLEM NAHI HONA CHAHIYE YEH TO MUSLIMS KE ANDAR FAMILY SYSTEM KA MATTER HAI AGAR KOI DHARM WALE APNE KOI MATTER UNKE DHARM KE HISAB SE SOLVE KARTE HAIN TO MUSLIMS KO TO IS BAAT SE KOI LENA DENA NAHI HOTA HAI
Bhai...sahi bola....constitution ki jarurat hi kya....aag laga dete hai....itne saare ipc , criminal courts , civil courts bana rakhe hai , commission on women , minority , transgender......yeah sab hat dete hai ...
Synopsis: 1-The case was filled by Shah Bano ,married with Mohammad Ahmad Khan in 1925, for demanding the certain amount of maintenace/alimony (₹200 ₹/month) in Madhya Pradesh highcourt in 1980 against district court judgement of ₹25/month as alimony passed in 1979 , since her husband , Mohammad Ahmad Khan ,an advocate, ousted her from his home in 1975 with her 5 children and finally gave her triple Talaq/ Talaq-E- Biddat in 1978. Only ₹ 3000 were paid to her as meher amount as per Muslim personal law and alimony was also stopped citing the reference of muslim personal law in which it is said the maintenance shall be given for the time period of iddat only i.e. 90 days only. 2-Following the hierarchy of courts an appeal was filled by her husband against the decision of Madhya Pradesh Highcourt , which was stating to pay ₹ 179.20/month as alimony and this appeal was dismissed by Supreme Court's 5 judge bench and the order of high court was confirmed. 3- The arguments which were put forwaded by her husband are as follows: 3.1- As it is the matter of muslim personal law hence court can not interefere by taking reference of CrPC and as per Muslim personal law the maintenace money shall be given for period of Iddat only i.e 90 days and meher had already been given as per the provisions of Muslim Personal Law (Not codified till now) . 3.2 Article 127 of CrPC is superceding Article 125 of CrPC as he had given meher to her .However article 125 of CrPC was enabling Shah Bano to get alimony from her husband. 3.3 Meher has already been paid as per MPL hence no rights of alimony can be given further to his wife. 4-Arguments of Shah Bano are as follows: 4.1- As her husband stopped to pay maintenance hence it is criminal act and it should come in ambit of CrPC Article 125 not in the purview of MPL. 4.2 Some Aayats of Quran and some previous cases were put forwarded and these were also suggesting to pay alimony. 5-Points put forwrded by Supreme Court on 23 April 1985: 5.1- This case is between MPL and CrPC and in this case CrPC will supercede MPL and Shah Bano will get the same alimony as decided by highcourt of MP. 6-The then central govt. and its actions: 6.1- In initial time the then govt. welcomed the SC judgement but in later stage it was opposed by central govt. since the leading party was losing election in many states due the polarisation and opposition of SC judgement by fundamentalist. Hence to allay these section the govt. enacted an act titled The Muslim Women(Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 that nullified the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shah Bano judgment. In this act the husband has to pay alimony only for the period of Iddat hence Shah Bano case was diluted by this act. Moreover this act led to communalisation of Indian politics. However in some future judgements supreme court ordered to give alimony for more than three months. 6.2-To allay other sections/religion people Rajiv Gandhi ordered to open gates of Ram Mandir for practising some religious activities. 7. Why there was resistance by fundamentalist class? 7.1. As this judgement was seen as an attack on muslim personal law and the Muslim religion as well. 7.2. Supreme court also asked from govt. for making a uniform civil code so that these type of cases can be resolved uniformly and this can strengthen unity in diversity. This statment of supreme court led to the communalisation of whole issue and in response to this there was heavy resistance by these fundamentalist people againts the ruling govt. was seen .
This actually reflects how prudently it is to maintain or run a secular country...And what consequences it can bring if your decision is turned to be wrong.. And that pressure of being right every time can beared by this country only....
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 did judiciary changed their decision??? No they dint that shows that court take their decision instead of changing courts decision they choose to criticize it .
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 kya masjid me mahilaye jaa sakti hai.shah bano case dharam ke angle se na dekhte hue insaniyat ki nazar se dekhne ki jarurat hai.agar koi dharam kisi vyakti ke sath anyay karta hai to ese dharam ko apne me sudhar ki jarurat hai.
There is only one political party in India that has balls to fuel Socio Economic reforms in the country. We all know the name of that party and hopefully it will continue to rule India for next 50 years .🥰 Those who prefer appeasement politics can go with Congress .
@@sanchardarshan Who did riots in Kashmir when Hindus were thrown out?? Who wanted Pakistan? Who did Moplah riots?? Who did West Bengal riots..Who did Naulakha riots? Who did Assam riots?? Who did Mumbai riots?? Who did Kerela riots??
So Rajiv Gandhi was more Ignorant and selfish for power than Modi. He didn't think once for the rights of Muslim Women while passing the law. And I see one more thing here, lots of Ministeries were there havung muslim Ministers, odd.
यहां एक को इंसाफ़ देने के लिए पूरी मेजोरिटी की लॉ बदली गई। वाही दूसरी तरफ मेजोरिटी को खुश करने के लिए पूरी सबूत और कागजात को साइड कर कहा गया की जमीन तो वाफ बोर्ड की है पर मेजोरिटी की आस्था को ध्यान में रखते होए ये जमीन उनको हो दे दीया जाता है। इंसाफ़ का दो तरजू दोनो ही सामने है ??
Bhai ek kaam kro Nhi pasand aha rha india ka constitution to Aganisthan chale jao ... Passport ban jayega tumra jaldi hi Rho khalifayug me sb ko sariyat ka kanoon milega wha pe
@@harshity4414 जानते तुम फॉलोवर की किया वनाम्ना है। खुद से ज़्यादा दुसरे देश का वीज़ा ले कर बैठे हो। आपने धर्म से ज्यादा दुसरे धर्म की फिकर। अपनी बाहें बाटी से ज्यादा परोसी को बेटी की फिकर । आपने धर्मस्थल से ज्यादा दूर धर्मस्थल पर जाने की फिकर । क्या हाल कर बैठे हो। भाई
There is No responsibility on ex Husband, after completion of ID Iddat ie 3 months . Laws of Qur'an are a Blessing to both Partners. Marriage is not a janm janm ka Bandhan in Islam.
Ek hi desh me do alalg alag perelal savidhan chalta hai yaha. Ye is desh k savidhan ki apangta ko darsata hai .jo savidhan kisi pidit asahay k hito ki rksha sahayta na kar sake wo kis kam ka.muslim vivahit mahilawo ki jindagi ko narak banakar rakke the itne time se kisi rakyel se kam nahi thi inki jindagi.thanks to modi remove teen talak kesi bhi rajniti ho kam sahi disha me karte hai.jo savidhan our bade bade supreme court nahi kar pate.
शाह बानो केस मे #राजीव गांधी सरकार का फैसला सही था क्युकी सरकार एक व्यक्ति विशेष के पक्ष मे निर्णय नही ले सकती अगर #शाह बानो के साथ हजारो हजारो मूस्लिम महिलाए खडी हो जाती तो राजीवजी की सरकार शाह बानो के साथ और #सुप्रिम कोर्ट के निर्णय के साथ ही जाती ...क्युकी सुप्रिम कोर्ट न्याय को देखकर निर्णय करता है और सरकार जनमत को देखती है
अगर मुसलमान कोर्ट मे कुराण लेकर आ सकते है तो हिंदु भी मनुसमृती , पंजाबी गुरूबानी, ख्रिश्चन बायबल लाये क्या कोर्ट मे ??? कोर्ट इनका भी आधार लेकर न्याय करेगी क्या ???
जीवन जीने का अधिकार दो पर्सोनल लॉ की बत्ती पर पानी डाल दो व्यक्ति जिंदा रहेगा तो मजहब रहेगा जब व्यक्ति नही रहेगा तो कौनसा मजहब बच्चे गा डायनासोर से इतना तो सीख सकते है प्रकृति से कोई बड़ा नही है
Muslim personal law board ne ye to bata diya ki iddat khatm to ab nafqa (guzara bhatta) shohar nahi dega lekin baap ki wirasat me orat ka jo hissa hota h wo kaha gaya. Or hr musalman ladki ko apni virasat ka haq kabhi nahi chorna chahiye.
Some countries allows Personal Laws. Personal Laws deals with civil matters of a community pertaining to marriage, divorce and inheritance. There have been many debates on implementing Uniform Civil Code in India. Hindus say that they are not governed by any personal law but by secular laws of Indian constitution. Though some Hindu laws are codified such as the Hindu Marriage Act but inheritance law of Hindus called Mitakshara and Dayabhaga law is still followed by Hindus and it has legal backing. So it is inappropriate to say that Hindus do not follow personal law. They have their own form of personal law which is not discussed by any media. In some states like Haryana, Hindus believes in Khap Panchayat which is an assembly of village elders pronouncing punishment even in criminal matters. Though Khap Panchayat has no legal status but they are very influential and has emerged as a judicial body. The Hindu code bill faced severe opposition by Hindus who now claim that they happily accepted it and that they change with time. But that’s not true, the Hindu Code Bill was met with strong opposition from Hindu religious leaders and outfits, in 1949 RSS burned effigies of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as a protest against the Hindu Code Bill. The RSS hated Dr. Ambedkar to such an extent and now it is trying to appropriate Dr. Ambedkar to win hearts of Dalits and use them in riots. Hindus demanding Uniform Civil Code is nothing but a frustration against Muslims. They actually want to enforce their laws on Muslims. Other communities such as Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists are also governed by Hindu Marriage Act, had Muslims also followed Hindu Marriage Act then Hindus would not have raised the issue of implementing Uniform Civil Code. Why Hindus have been so intolerant towards those following their religion? Why Hindus are having problem if Muslims are following their religious laws in civil matters? In the future Hindus may also demand that Muslims must convert to Hinduism. After all I find little difference between enforcing religion and enforcing ones laws on others. How can Hindus demand to implement UCC without presenting a draft bill? Vice Chancellor of NALSAR Mr. Faizan Mustafa also said, “In 1941, a drafting committee comprising 8 members was formed under the chairmanship of (Jurist) B N Rao, that gave its report which was later debated, then a Hindu Code Bill was formed but it was not passed and compromised with Hindu Fundamentalists and diluted. Eventually Law Minister Dr B R Ambedkar had to resign over this. So even after 15 years exercise, government could not make a strong and reform law because daughter could not make copartner. That change government could bring in 2005. Still till today, Hindu laws have not been reformed and there are no uniform Hindu laws…So if government wants to bring reform in Muslim laws. It should make a committee of experts, wait for their report, open it for public debate then make any law.”
पहली बात मेहर निक़ाह के वक़्त दी जाती हैं दूसरी बात इद्दत 3 माह नही हैं 4 माह 10 दिन या गर्भावस्था होने पर बच्चे के जन्म होने तक 3.)तीन तलाक़ एक बार मे दिया ही नही दिया जा सकता(अल्लाह के नज़दीक सबसे नापसन्दीदा काम जो इस्लाम मे जायज़ भी हैं वो तलाक़ हैं 4.) हलाला का इस्लाम की किस किताब मे ज़िक्र हैं (हलाला जैसी कोई चीज़ इस्लाम में हैं ही नही ) किसी बात से असहमत हो तो अपनी दलील पेश करो यदि तुम सच्चे हो क़ुरान या हद्दिस से
In today's world, why there is alimony when everyone is capable of doing job or something else. I think this law must be changed and alimony should only be given when she is disabled or having custody of his biological minor child.
Don't follow venomous religious scholars, read Quran, alimony is must, if she has no other means. And you expect your wife to be less, educated, be at home, and after divorce start earning herself, islam never ask women to earn, if she'swillingto do it, then its ok.
this is the definition of Liberal according to google :"relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.".. tumne kya padh liya hai ?
@@23Anirudh yaha to defination hi badl di inn logo ne to bjp privatisation krti hai to liberals virodh krte hai equal rights ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Citizenship dene ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Reform lane ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Bhai tune kya dekha fir inn liberals me jo iss definition me likha hai. India ke liberals duniya ke liberals se alg hai yaha sarkar ka virodh Krna hi liberal gang ka km hai chahe kuch bhi ho
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
@SP R to tum mante ho, mens and womens equal nahi he, kaho sari womens kamjor he, abla he, Jobs ke layak nahi, Aasahay he, self depended nahi he, fir to banta he paisa dena, aur dena bhi chahiye 100% right......🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sabdi badi samasya si desh banaye gaye personal law board hi hai uniform civil code is must, tabhi congress ka ye haal hai, Galat ka samarthan kiya congress ne
Sare confusion ki jad 2:46 me h. " MAHAR Ki RAKAM" Ye wo rakam h jo sadi k wakt ladki tay karti h ki es ladke se sadi karne ka mai ETNA Rupay lungi. Agar ladke ko manjur h to mujhse sadi kare warna aage ka rasta dekhe. Esi ko na samjh pane k wajah se ham muslim ka etna beda gark hua h. Arab countries me ladkiya sadi k liye MAHAR me lakho rupay aur to aur koi ladki to pura ka pura ghar hi mangti h MAHAR me. ...khuda na kare ki divorce ho..... Magar.. agar divorce hua to wo sare rakam,ghar jo us ladki ne MAHAR me liya h wo to us ladki ka hi h aur wo ladki us rakam,ghar ko le chali jayegi.
![NISAMANEE - TADA (ท้าดา) [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hcQHEPMmJpU/mqdefault.jpg)
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
The judgement of sc in shah bano case was one of the most revolutionary judgement and the way rajiv gandhi overturned the decision to please their muslim vote bank was one of the weakest decision. If rajiv gandhi had taken this judgement rationally, it would have led to UCC.
Abb toh modi hin karega 🎉🎉
Exactly,Ucc is very important for nation development not the congress secularism
Bilkul ye hi hua tha
Very well written and presented
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Sister shah baano is honour of India...
She fought against crime...
She was great
The judgement by SC was very progressive.
ex PM Rajiv Gandhi ka sabse bada blunder keh sakte hai ise.
rajiv gandhi ne sab blunder hi kiye hai
Right 👍
@@shivangdixit007 andhbhakti aur andhvirodh - dono bhi khatarnak bimariya hai 🙏
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
What about judgement of sabrimala and judgement on Diwali cracker ??
Shah bano was right, if she's not earning or being supported by mahram, ex husbands has to give alimony to her and children also, its must. Moreover second marriage is not a sweet, it's only done when there's a logical need, like much higher female( divorced, widowed) than male
00
She had sons of age 30+, her son should have cared of her...
@@conversesaucer0490 on that case on should be called in court
@@conversesaucer0490 if that would be the case with your mother/sister then your opinion remain the same ?
@@shivasingh-jd1zx my sister is pursuing PHD from IIT. she herself is capable enough to run a house on her own. If it happens with my mother. Than I and my sister will support her, as per islam rules a daughter has right to property of her father. So my mother has some portion of her father's home on her name. Follow islam completely than only you will understand its beauty.
Being a upsc aspirant, its been very basic for us to do case study of this #ShahBanoCase under polity.
Being UPSC Aspirant you have no knowledge of Shah Bano case till you join BJP.
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
@@akbaba007 faminism ka matlab azadi naki zimmedaari ye log sirf azadi ki baat krte hai zimmedaari ki nhi to dene hi padega😂😂😂
@@gulamanekhadim5166 yahi to chutiyapanti he...🤣murkho ki murkh wali soch....
@@akbaba007 suno be agr jis wife ko aapne divorce diya h vo job nhi krti h aur koi earning nhi h toh aapko usko apne bachon ko maintainance dena padega but in case women is earning then uska koi khrcha nhi dena hoga bs bachon ki maintaince deni pdti h .
That's why they have problem in UCC
Why Hindu have problem in Hindu marriage Act 1955?
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 nobody have problem with hindu marrige act 1955 , those going for divorce have to follow it and are following it the 6 month term
Classical Example of "Minority Appeasement politics" that too of orthodox and extremist section of minority, in the History of Independent India!
Ohhh,
Celebration Killing of People in India,
Mocking Deaths,
Garlanding Culprits of Police Killers, and Mob Lynchers is Example of Nationalists Governments in Independent India?
@@Malik_are_Kings What is your problem mate? Do you come from the same Extremist Orthodox section of Muslims who still think their appeasement is the only type of Secularism India can have?
@@sanatani_by_heart9488 My Dear Sanatani who has Zero Defination, Zero Knowledge and wanted to make his Name with Stupidity.
Can you define What you say anything?
@@Malik_are_Kings Yes! Why not! Right from the beginning of Gandhian era in Congress, this story of appeasement started. It was the last time in 1857 during which Hindus and Muslims of India get unified fought against British. But after that Sir Syed Ahmed Khan felt that Muslims suffered too much by fighting with British and he advocated for British education for Muslims and their allegiance to British Government for a better future as a community. Now, Majority of Muslims had lost interest in India's freedom struggle. Mr. Gandhi wanted the support of Muslims in Freedom struggle and to garner that he started the policy of "Muslim Appeasement", i.e. supporting the religious beliefs of Muslims to drive them towards freedom movement. He supported "Khilafat Movement" and in turn "Moplah Massacre" in Kerala which was linked to Turkish Khalifa and had no relation with India. This step widened the gap between Hindus and Muslims since Indian Muslims were less concerned about their own nation but more concerned for Turkic Khalifa. This step also fuelled the concept of "Ummah" which further alienated Indian Muslims from the emotion of "Nationalism". The appeasement of India's Muslims continued even after freedom. Congress and other parties did it to create a vote bank for them. Over the years due to this Hindus started feeling alienated and it resulted in "Rise of Hindutva politics" in India. This appeasement policy gave nothing to Muslims in society. There were absolutely no reforms. Aged old bad practices remained prevalent in Islamic Society of India which have been even banned in Muslim Countries like Saudi, due to absence of reforms and appeasement of Orthodox section of Muslims. Progressive Islamic leaders like Aarif Mohammad Khan were side lined.
*_When it comes to Law, our Constitution is (& will remain) higher than any Religious book._*
📘✔️ 📗❌
0⁰
Wrong.
No man make rule book for another man only creater has this right to impose laws on his creations.
Only humans should have executive and judiciary because legislation can't be done by one set of community for rest of the human beings.
They should (Government) only look after execution of that legislature and award/punish accordingly.
Bbai boh unko samjha
@@thevaibhavvats what is wrong in it?
All india muslim personal law board (AIMPLB) was formed during british raj by some elit class Muslim ulema belongs to UP and Delhi.
They felt that they are the guardian of entire Muslim community of the undivided india and and made the sharia law according to their convenience but not as per the guidance of the holi quran
Now it is managed by the same family and their friends and represent tha face of indian muslim.
The present generation of this body still belives that they are living in Mughal era and not ready to accept the fact that their family cheated the Muslim community for political support.
The Muslim personal law must be modified as the guideline of quran and body must not be a family business of some elit families of delhi and UP.
are u really a muslim?
there's no reply like this here😂
but yeah whoever says something ideal,others start asking if he's really a muslim or not.
& this should change
I say end muslim law borad including all board of all religions
@@hunter10348yes,I am an educated proud indian muslim. Muslim personal law is represented by some elite Muslim since british period and gets political patronizing from generation to generation. Therefore, they never change their stand only to make the community feel that they are the guardian of the entire Muslim community of India.
@@rohitchauhan2355 in this multi culture and religion community - there must be a personal law board for each religion and community. The laws must be formed based on their faith with the prospective of the modern society and religious beliefs.
If the paries are not satisfied with their personal law the can approach to court of justice.
Ohh , first time i came to know this..!
Thanks for giving such information..!
You are rational n educated, the people like you should raise the voice against such so called elite class and lead the Muslim community of our country n torch bearer for them in right direction.
God bless you...!
Thankyou for the information
UCC होना चाहिए
*Shah Bano Case Dispute : An Example of The Idiocy of The Indian Muslims*
When Prime Minister Indira Gandhi made CrPC in 1973 and applied in 1974, then was not 'Islam In Danger'. The national election became in 1985 after the murder of Indira Gandhi. Congress had won more than 400 seats and BJP had won only 2 seats in the election.
The Honorable Supreme Court ordered to pay maintenance to Shah Bano according CrPC, 125 in 1985 and Islam came in danger. Right wing AIMPLB and orthodoxy Islamists had opposed the verdict of the Supreme Court and Muslim society supported this a oppose idiotic. Finally Rajiv Gandhi government made Muslim Women Act, 1986 and applied. For the Rajiv Gandhi government was hard to deny Muslim women from fundamental right 'Equality before the law and equal protection of law' of article 14. The Rajiv Gandhi government keeps provision in section 5 of new act right to maintenance according CrPC 125 by declaration. The Right wing AIMPLB and the orthodoxy Islamists supportes new act.
Now a question is, if a Muslim women may use provision in Muslim Women Act, 1986, Section 5 and may demand maintenance according CrPC, 125, then what did Shah Bano crime? She had demanded maintenance according CrPC, 125.
In Short, the Shah Bano case dispute is an example of idiocy of the Muslim people of India.
*Explanation*
*Article 14-* The Constitution of India, Article 14.- The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.
*CrPC 125-* The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 125 - (1) If any person having sufficient means neglects or refuses to maintain-
(a) his wife, unable to maintain herself,
a Magistrate of the first class may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make a monthly allowance for the maintenance of his wife or such child, father or mother, at such monthly rate not exceeding five hundred rupees in the whole, as such Magistrate thinks fit, and to pay the same to such person as the Magistrate may from time to time direct: Provided that the Magistrate may order the father of a minor female child referred to in clause (b) to make such allowance, until she attains her majority, if the Magistrate is satisfied that the husband of such minor female child, if married, is not possessed of sufficient means. Explanation.- For the purposes of this Chapter,-
(b) " wife" includes a woman who has been divorced by, or has obtained a divorce from, her husband and has not remarried.
*Muslim Women Act, 1986 Section 5-* The Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Divorce) Act, 1986, Section 5 -
Option to be governed by the provisions of sections 125 to 128 of Act 2 of 1974. If on the date of the first hearing of the application under sub-section (2) of section 3, a divorced woman and her former husband declare, by affidavit or any other declaration in writing in such form as may be prescribed, either jointly or separately, that they would prefer to be governed by the provisions of sections 125 to 128 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), and file such affidavit or declaration in the court hearing the application, the Magistrate shall dispose of such application accordingly.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this section, "date of the first hearing of the application" means the date fixed in the summons for the attendance of the respondent to the application.
*AIMIM-* All India Muslim Personal Law Board. Which is a right wing NGO.
-Zenzo Kurita, Solapur, Maharashtra, India.
All India Muslim Personal Law Board should be strictly ban and kick out of the country
There is really shameful that By Using Religion Book
Men deny the fundamental right of Women.
That Why Triple Talaq, UCC is important
But the question is why i give alimony to a woman who allready divorced with me ?
My hard work money is not free fund 😒
@@shahabuddinkhan7313 just give half property no bhatta
@J stallion but it doesn't mean i give her my money whole life
@@adityaraj880 well ISLAM it's main solution
In QURAN ALLAH says give your EX-wife some of your money and property like 1/3 or 1/4 i think
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
Islam maybe a great religion for those who follow...But the Muslim laws are terrible for women!
I know many Muslim women are very happy that Ucc is getting implemented
It will protect their lives, give them property right from parents and even get equal amount of property if she is divorced.. as in Hindu laws .
UCC will be truly uplifting for Muslim women and her children..
Absolutely agree with you
U should read about rights given for females in Quran. Please read from legit source not from wp University 😇
@@laraibansari9077 i don't need to read ...
Cases like Shahbano case
Triple talaq
Talaq e Hasan
Halala
4 marriages. Burka, hijab
are enough for me..
Cant digest more than that
@@laraibansari9077 It doesn't matter what Quran says about "Rights of Women", unless the Muslim Society interprets it rightly and implements it! The problem of Indian Muslim lies here only. Whenever questioned they suggest intellects to read "Quran" but they don't answer if they have really implemented the right interpretation of Quranic Verses into their society. Because if Quran is the word of Allah, then it's following must not result in chaos! So, I think there's a huge gap in applying the things in the society as written in Quran.
@@Mrinalini.m लंड की पूजा करने वाले हमे सजेशन ना ही दे तो बेहतर है 😂😂😂😂
Ucc is necessary
Good to see that lallantop is reading comments and learning from it.
अगर कांग्रेस की नियत सही होती तो इस मामले को उस समय खत्म किया जा सकता था... लेकिन नरसिम्हा राव के इस कथन से नियत साफ हो जाती है कि अगर मुस्लिम गटर मे रहना चाहते है तो इसमें बुराई क्या है हम समाज सुधारक क्यों बने...
Aaj ye case thik se samajh aaya ✌️thank u nikhil & kal @ llantop
अब लगता है bjp ज्यादा गलत नहीं है
Bjp jo karahey sab rightwing ideology k khilaaf kara raha hey jo congress karna tha
Isme bjp kha se sahi lagti hai... Abhi jo bjp lr rahi hai woh kiya sahi hai?
Tumhe noakri mile ya nhi ki bhikh mang ke khate ho.... Chalne ke liye gadi to hogi lekin petrol nhi😂😂😂 pahle gas ka intjam kr
@@gulamanekhadim5166 naukri to tumhare paas nhi hai tbhi to tum job job chillate ho
@@utkarshagrawal2002 th-cam.com/video/vWfAeS4gWzQ/w-d-xo.html ....... Hungar index india ka😂😂😂 ispe baat krle अनपढ़
From the very beginning we took thepath of appeasement, sad part is it never benefited even for those who were being appeased.
*शहाबानो मामला विवाद : भारतीय मुस्लिमों की मूर्खता की मिसाल*
जब प्रधानमंत्री इंदिरा गांधी इन्होने १९७३ में CrPC बनाया और १९७४ में लागू किया, तब 'इस्लाम खतरे में' नहीं था। इंदिरा गांधी की हत्या के बाद १९८५ में चुनाव हुए। चुनाव में काँग्रेस ने ४०० से ज्यादा सीटें जीती थी और भाजपा ने सिर्फ २ सीटें जीती थी।
मा. उच्चतम न्यायालय ने १९८५ में शहाबानो को CrPC१२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता देने का आदेश दिया। इस आदेश से इस्लाम खतरे में आ गया। दक्षिणपंथीय मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड और सनातनी इस्लामवादीयों ने इस निर्णय का विरोध किया और मुस्लिम समाज ने इस विरोध का मूर्ख समर्थन किया। आखिरकार राजीव गांधी सरकार ने मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम, १९८६ बनाया और लागू किया। राजीव सरकार को अनुच्छेद १४ का 'कानून के सामने समानता और कानून की समान सुरक्षा' इस मौलिक अधिकार से मुस्लिम महिला को सीधे वंचित करना मुश्किल था। इसलिए राजीव गांधी सरकारने नये अधिनियम की धारा ५ में प्रावधान किया की मुस्लिम महिला घोषणापत्र द्वारा CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांग सकती है। इस अधिनियम का दक्षिणपंथीय मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड और सनातनी इस्लामवादीयों ने समर्थन किया।
अब प्रश्न यह है कि अगर मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम १९८६, धारा ५ के अनुसार मुस्लिम महिला CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांग सकती है, तो शहाबानो ने क्या गुनाह किया था? शहाबानो ने CrPC १२५ के अनुसार गुजारा भत्ता मांगा था।
संक्षेप में, शहाबानो मामला विवाद भारतीय मुस्लिमों के मूर्खता की एक मिसाल है।
*स्पष्टीकरण*
*अनुच्छेद १४-* भारतीय संविधान अनुच्छेद १४ - राज्य, भारत के राज्यक्षेत्र में किसी व्यक्ति को विधि के समक्ष समता से या विधियों के सामान संरक्षण से वंचित नहीं करेगा।
*CrPC, १२५-* दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, १९७३, धारा १२५ - (१) यदि पर्याप्त साधनों वाला कोई व्यक्ति
(ए) अपनी पत्नी का, जो अपना भरणपोषण करने में असमर्थ है,
भरणपोषण करने में उपेक्षा करता है या भरणपोषण करने से इनकार करता है तो प्रथम वर्ग मजिस्ट्रेट, ऐसी उपेक्षा या इनकार के साबित हो जाने पर, ऐसे व्यक्ति को यह निदेश दे सकता है कि वह अपनी पत्नीके भरणपोषण के लि ऐसी मासिक दर पर, जिसे मजिस्ट्रेट ठीक समझे, मासिक भत्ता दे और उस भत्ते का संदाय ऐसे व्यक्ति को करे जिसको संदाय करने का मजिस्ट्रेट समय-समय पर निदेश दे।
स्पष्टीकरण-इस अध्याय के प्रयोजनों के लिए
(बी) “पत्नी के अंतर्गत ऐसी स्त्री भी है जिसके पति ने उससे विवाह-विच्छेद कर लिया है या जिसने अपने पति से विवाहविच्छेद कर लिया है और जिसने पुनर्विवाह नहीं किया है।
*मुस्लिम महिला अधिनियम, १९८६, धारा ५ -* मुस्लिम महिला (तलाक पर अधिकारी की सुरक्षा) अधिनियम, १९८६, धारा ५ -
५. १९७४ के अधिनियम २ की धारा१२५ से धारा १२८ तक के उपबंधों द्वारा शासित होने का विकल्प-यदि धारा ३ की उपधारा (२) के अधीन आवेदन की पहली सुनवाई की तारीख को विच्छिन्न विवाह स्त्री और उसका पूर्व पति शपथपत्र या किसी अन्य लिखित घोषणा द्वारा ऐसे प्ररूप में, जो विहित किया जाए, या तो संयुक्त रूप से या पृथक्तः, यह घोषित करते हैं कि वे दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता, १९७३ (१९७४ का २) की धारा १२५ से धारा १२८ तक के उपबन्धों द्वारा शासित होना चाहते हैं और वे आवेदन की सुनवाई करने वाले न्यायालय में ऐसा शपथपत्र या घोषणा फाइल करते है, तो मजिस्ट्रेट ऐसे आवेदन को तदनुसार निपटाएगा ।
स्पष्टीकरण-इस धारा के प्रयोजनों के लिए, आवेदन की पहली सुनवाई की तारीख" से वह तारीख अभिप्रेत है जो आवेदन के प्रत्यर्थी की हाजिरी के लिए समन में नियत की गई है ।
*मुस्लिम लॉ बोर्ड-* ऑल इंडिया मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ बोर्ड (अखिल भारतीय मुस्लिम व्यक्तिगत कानून मंडल) यह एक दक्षिणपंथीय गैर-सरकारी संस्था है।
- झेनझो कुरिटा, सोलापूर, महाराष्ट्र, भारत।
Very detailed information
There is only one book that can rule over India. And that is Constitution.
If someone thinks that there religious books are superior then constitution. They can leave the country.
ZIS JUDGE MISHRA N AYODHYA K KIWAD KHULWAE .USNE JUDGMENT M KHA KI JB USNE FAISLA SUNAYA TO USE KALA BANDER DIKHAE DIA ZO HNUMAN THA .ZISNE MUJE KHA KI TUM MANDIR K DWAR KHULWA DO .BTAO US DESH KA HAAL AAP DEKH SKTE HO JHA JUDGE MANSIK ROOP SE BIMAR HO
@@ashokkumar-se5sl kehna kya chahte ho?
Well explained
What repercussions that one ruling had on the Muslim community of India ... it was the curse of Shah Bano
@Prince Kumar yes ... UCC
Live for Humanity 🕊️
It was same vote bank Politics Jo Sabrimala Temple ke issue pe bhi hua tha, Political Parties cannot sacrifice their traditional voters.
very informative video
अगर ये कांड नहीं हुआ होता तो आज शायद हिंदुत्व विचारधारा इतनी प्रबल नही हुई होती ।
Some countries allows Personal Laws. Personal Laws deals with civil matters of a community pertaining to marriage, divorce and inheritance. There have been many debates on implementing Uniform Civil Code in India. Hindus say that they are not governed by any personal law but by secular laws of Indian constitution. Though some Hindu laws are codified such as the Hindu Marriage Act but inheritance law of Hindus called Mitakshara and Dayabhaga law is still followed by Hindus and it has legal backing. So it is inappropriate to say that Hindus do not follow personal law. They have their own form of personal law which is not discussed by any media. In some states like Haryana, Hindus believes in Khap Panchayat which is an assembly of village elders pronouncing punishment even in criminal matters. Though Khap Panchayat has no legal status but they are very influential and has emerged as a judicial body. The Hindu code bill faced severe opposition by Hindus who now claim that they happily accepted it and that they change with time. But that’s not true, the Hindu Code Bill was met with strong opposition from Hindu religious leaders and outfits, in 1949 RSS burned effigies of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as a protest against the Hindu Code Bill. The RSS hated Dr. Ambedkar to such an extent and now it is trying to appropriate Dr. Ambedkar to win hearts of Dalits and use them in riots.
Hindus demanding Uniform Civil Code is nothing but a frustration against Muslims. They actually want to enforce their laws on Muslims. Other communities such as Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists are also governed by Hindu Marriage Act, had Muslims also followed Hindu Marriage Act then Hindus would not have raised the issue of implementing Uniform Civil Code. Why Hindus have been so intolerant towards those following their religion? Why Hindus are having problem if Muslims are following their religious laws in civil matters? In the future Hindus may also demand that Muslims must convert to Hinduism. After all I find little difference between enforcing religion and enforcing ones laws on others. How can Hindus demand to implement UCC without presenting a draft bill? Vice Chancellor of NALSAR Mr. Faizan Mustafa also said, “In 1941, a drafting committee comprising 8 members was formed under the chairmanship of (Jurist) B N Rao, that gave its report which was later debated, then a Hindu Code Bill was formed but it was not passed and compromised with Hindu Fundamentalists and diluted. Eventually Law Minister Dr B R Ambedkar had to resign over this. So even after 15 years exercise, government could not make a strong and reform law because daughter could not make copartner. That change government could bring in 2005. Still till today, Hindu laws have not been reformed and there are no uniform Hindu laws…So if government wants to bring reform in Muslim laws. It should make a committee of experts, wait for their report, open it for public debate then make any law.”
बहुत खुब निखिल जी
And after 2014 Modi showed middle finger to bulla law board😂
Then muslims showed lund to bjp🤣🤣
@@Anonymous-qg5im par kata land itna chhota tha, bjp walo ko dikha hi nahi😂🤣🤣
@@Anonymous-qg5im usse lund nhi kati lulli kehte hai😅😅😅😅
@@Anonymous-qg5im lol and bjp said- abbe lawde koi farak nai padta.
One of the best voices : Nitin❤
All the muslim board ko dissolve kr deni chahiye india me bhut shnti bani rhegi
God bless you 😇🤣🤣
@@laraibansari9077 ty accha hua allah bless me nhi likha 😂😂 Christian ho ya hindu
Inshaallah.. tumhari manokaamna poori hogi vats.
@@anurag4722 Jahilo ko kia pata Allah ka matlab God hota hai...(word God with capital G in english).
@@Omar-sn1uy allah sirf ek terrorism felane ka zaria hai wo bhgwan to ho nhi skta to insan ko mrne ko bole
Great chennal lallntop
BHAI EK BAAT AAJ TAK SAMAJH MEIN NAHI AAYI KE AGAR MUSLIMS APNE KOI PROBLEM MUSLIM LAW KE KANOON KE HISAB SE SOLVE KAR LETE HAIN TO DOOSRE DHARM KE LOGO PAR IS KOI PROBLEM NAHI HONA CHAHIYE YEH TO MUSLIMS KE ANDAR FAMILY SYSTEM KA MATTER HAI AGAR KOI DHARM WALE APNE KOI MATTER UNKE DHARM KE HISAB SE SOLVE KARTE HAIN TO MUSLIMS KO TO IS BAAT SE KOI LENA DENA NAHI HOTA HAI
Bhai...sahi bola....constitution ki jarurat hi kya....aag laga dete hai....itne saare ipc , criminal courts , civil courts bana rakhe hai , commission on women , minority , transgender......yeah sab hat dete hai
...
Synopsis:
1-The case was filled by Shah Bano ,married with Mohammad Ahmad Khan in 1925, for demanding the certain amount of maintenace/alimony (₹200 ₹/month) in Madhya Pradesh highcourt in 1980 against district court judgement of ₹25/month as alimony passed in 1979 , since her husband , Mohammad Ahmad Khan ,an advocate, ousted her from his home in 1975 with her 5 children and finally gave her triple Talaq/ Talaq-E- Biddat in 1978. Only ₹ 3000 were paid to her as meher amount as per Muslim personal law and alimony was also stopped citing the reference of muslim personal law in which it is said the maintenance shall be given for the time period of iddat only i.e. 90 days only.
2-Following the hierarchy of courts an appeal was filled by her husband against the decision of Madhya Pradesh Highcourt , which was stating to pay ₹ 179.20/month as alimony and this appeal was dismissed by Supreme Court's 5 judge bench and the order of high court was confirmed.
3- The arguments which were put forwaded by her husband are as follows:
3.1- As it is the matter of muslim personal law hence court can not interefere by taking reference of CrPC and as per Muslim personal law the maintenace money shall be given for period of Iddat only i.e 90 days and meher had already been given as per the provisions of Muslim Personal Law (Not codified till now) .
3.2 Article 127 of CrPC is superceding Article 125 of CrPC as he had given meher to her .However article 125 of CrPC was enabling Shah Bano to get alimony from her husband.
3.3 Meher has already been paid as per MPL hence no rights of alimony can be given further to his wife.
4-Arguments of Shah Bano are as follows:
4.1- As her husband stopped to pay maintenance hence it is criminal act and it should come in ambit of CrPC Article 125 not in the purview of MPL.
4.2 Some Aayats of Quran and some previous cases were put forwarded and these were also suggesting to pay alimony.
5-Points put forwrded by Supreme Court on 23 April 1985:
5.1- This case is between MPL and CrPC and in this case CrPC will supercede MPL and Shah Bano will get the same alimony as decided by highcourt of MP.
6-The then central govt. and its actions:
6.1- In initial time the then govt. welcomed the SC judgement but in later stage it was opposed by central govt. since the leading party was losing election in many states due the polarisation and opposition of SC judgement by fundamentalist. Hence to allay these section the govt. enacted an act titled The Muslim Women(Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 that nullified the Supreme Court's judgment in the Shah Bano judgment. In this act the husband has to pay alimony only for the period of Iddat hence Shah Bano case was diluted by this act. Moreover this act led to communalisation of Indian politics.
However in some future judgements supreme court ordered to give alimony for more than three months.
6.2-To allay other sections/religion people Rajiv Gandhi ordered to open gates of Ram Mandir for practising some religious activities.
7. Why there was resistance by fundamentalist class?
7.1. As this judgement was seen as an attack on muslim personal law and the Muslim religion as well.
7.2. Supreme court also asked from govt. for making a uniform civil code so that these type of cases can be resolved uniformly and this can strengthen unity in diversity. This statment of supreme court led to the communalisation of whole issue and in response to this there was heavy resistance by these fundamentalist people againts the ruling govt. was seen .
This actually reflects how prudently it is to maintain or run a secular country...And what consequences it can bring if your decision is turned to be wrong..
And that pressure of being right every time can beared by this country only....
This actually reflect that in secular country there is anti cow slaughter law, cow cess in various states.
In secular country when there was a judgement on sabrimala then amit shah had said judiciary should not give wrong judgement .
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 did judiciary changed their decision??? No they dint that shows that court take their decision instead of changing courts decision they choose to criticize it .
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 kya masjid me mahilaye jaa sakti hai.shah bano case dharam ke angle se na dekhte hue insaniyat ki nazar se dekhne ki jarurat hai.agar koi dharam kisi vyakti ke sath anyay karta hai to ese dharam ko apne me sudhar ki jarurat hai.
Nice explanation
देश कानून और संविधान से चलता धर्म से नहीं लेकिन हर बात को धर्म खतरे में है बोलने वालों को यह समझ नहीं आता है
Good job cort
There is only one political party in
India that has balls to fuel Socio
Economic reforms in the country.
We all know the name of that party
and hopefully it will continue to
rule India for next 50 years .🥰
Those who prefer appeasement
politics can go with Congress .
Yayy yayyy. Daro mat , Khul kar bolo
BJP🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Those who prefer communal riots and religious bigotry can go with BJP
@@sanchardarshan Who did riots in Kashmir when Hindus were thrown out?? Who wanted Pakistan? Who did Moplah riots?? Who did West Bengal riots..Who did Naulakha riots? Who did Assam riots?? Who did Mumbai riots?? Who did Kerela riots??
@@sanchardarshan aajke history padh le beta tere jaise gaddar hai isliyeh Aaj yeh halat hai desh ki
Google translate ka use Kia hai andhbhakt gaoubar__khakar😂🤣😆
Good job Llallan top and thanks.🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪
🇮🇳
So Rajiv Gandhi was more Ignorant and selfish for power than Modi.
He didn't think once for the rights of Muslim Women while passing the law.
And I see one more thing here, lots of Ministeries were there havung muslim Ministers, odd.
So you have the problem with Muslim minister. I mean hatred towards Muslim.
God bless🙏 💐💐💐💐💐💐🙏🤗👍🥰😇
Muslims rhane k wajase media aur BJP KI dukaan chalthi he😂😂
तो क्या चाहते हो सारे मुस्लिम पाकिस्तान या बांग्लादेश चले जायें?
Sahi pakre hai
@@priya_singh_tomar kyu jaye yar? Koi kyu jayega? Jo hamara haq he hum cheen k lenge😊
@@blanket.d konsa haq? Pakistan bana tha na muslim ke liye chale jao udhar
@@pranav6566 accha aur tumare liye Nepal tha hindu rastra tum uder chale jawo...😅
Arts and crafts with Shruti ❤❤❤❤❤ thank sir
Pahali baat ki dharm ke adhar pr koi criminal kanun banana hi nhi chahiye.
😮 देख लो भाईयो वोट पाने के लिए राजनेता कुछ भी कर सकते है चाहें वो कांग्रेस हो या बीजेपी
Good article
Beldon lollantop
Arif sir ko salam
Personal law hona hi nhi chaiye.kisi ke liye bi.
explained🎉
Unhi mihlao pr kiye gye pap aj congress bhugat rhi h ..
Shahbano ki haaye.. Rajiv Gandhi k parivar ko lagi h
यहां एक को इंसाफ़ देने के लिए पूरी मेजोरिटी की लॉ बदली गई। वाही दूसरी तरफ मेजोरिटी को खुश करने के लिए पूरी सबूत और कागजात को साइड कर कहा गया की जमीन तो वाफ बोर्ड की है पर मेजोरिटी की आस्था को ध्यान में रखते होए ये जमीन उनको हो दे दीया जाता है। इंसाफ़ का दो तरजू दोनो ही सामने है ??
Bhai ek kaam kro Nhi pasand aha rha india ka constitution to Aganisthan chale jao ... Passport ban jayega tumra jaldi hi Rho khalifayug me sb ko sariyat ka kanoon milega wha pe
@@harshity4414 जानते तुम फॉलोवर की किया वनाम्ना है। खुद से ज़्यादा दुसरे देश का वीज़ा ले कर बैठे हो। आपने धर्म से ज्यादा दुसरे धर्म की फिकर। अपनी बाहें बाटी से ज्यादा परोसी को बेटी की फिकर । आपने धर्मस्थल से ज्यादा दूर धर्मस्थल पर जाने की फिकर । क्या हाल कर बैठे हो। भाई
@@mdsarjilHindustan ki Sari zamin Hindustan ke non Muslims ki hai, teri zamin Pakistan ya Bangladesh me hai wahan chala ja aur flour ki bhikh mang
There is No responsibility on ex Husband, after completion of ID Iddat ie 3 months . Laws of Qur'an are a Blessing to both Partners. Marriage is not a janm janm ka Bandhan in Islam.
Either in hinduism too taking 7 pheras is related to 7 vachanas not to 7 births.
Haan bhai aurate aam h chus k fek do Islam me, 3 maheene ka ration deke. Isse jyda to center de rhi h ratio. 50+ age me thokar khati Shah Bano
Quran doesn't respect women if it can't provide mentainence stop supporting your radical religion
Time to bring UCC in India 🇮🇳
Ek hi desh me do alalg alag perelal savidhan chalta hai yaha. Ye is desh k savidhan ki apangta ko darsata hai .jo savidhan kisi pidit asahay k hito ki rksha sahayta na kar sake wo kis kam ka.muslim vivahit mahilawo ki jindagi ko narak banakar rakke the itne time se kisi rakyel se kam nahi thi inki jindagi.thanks to modi remove teen talak kesi bhi rajniti ho kam sahi disha me karte hai.jo savidhan our bade bade supreme court nahi kar pate.
Ha jaise mitakshara and dayabhaga for Hindu inherent.
7:39 to 7:41 awesome 😂😂😂😂😂
Tabhi congress and muslim k gandi halat h
UPSC ka ek bohot important topic hai Shah bano case.
समान नागरिक कानून के बारे में थोड़ा विस्तार से बता सकते हैं क्या इसके फायदे और नुकसान सहित
th-cam.com/video/xiVAIcDVYew/w-d-xo.html
शाह बानो केस मे #राजीव गांधी सरकार का फैसला सही था क्युकी सरकार एक व्यक्ति विशेष के पक्ष मे निर्णय नही ले सकती अगर #शाह बानो के साथ हजारो हजारो मूस्लिम महिलाए खडी हो जाती तो राजीवजी की सरकार शाह बानो के साथ और #सुप्रिम कोर्ट के निर्णय के साथ ही जाती ...क्युकी सुप्रिम कोर्ट न्याय को देखकर निर्णय करता है और सरकार जनमत को देखती है
This is why we need congress mukt bharat..so that these kind of incidents doesn't repeat!
N what BJP is doing..??
Niyam bdlna chahiye 👍👍
अगर मुसलमान कोर्ट मे कुराण लेकर आ सकते है तो हिंदु भी मनुसमृती , पंजाबी गुरूबानी, ख्रिश्चन बायबल लाये क्या कोर्ट मे ??? कोर्ट इनका भी आधार लेकर न्याय करेगी क्या ???
In short,
All Andha Namazi were against Muslim woman 😢
जीवन जीने का अधिकार दो
पर्सोनल लॉ की बत्ती पर पानी डाल दो
व्यक्ति जिंदा रहेगा तो मजहब रहेगा जब व्यक्ति नही रहेगा तो कौनसा मजहब बच्चे गा
डायनासोर से इतना तो सीख सकते है प्रकृति से कोई बड़ा नही है
Ek din Sab ko marna honga
Or jannat dojhak ka faisla bi honga
With reference to 1:22, what right "bahusankhyak" had to be angry since whether Shah Bano got alimony or not was not going to affect their lives.
Those who prefer communal riots and religious bigotry can go with BJP.
Sorry. No place for múzlims in BJP
Bjp is doing better than congress
You know nothing about Congress eating away the economic fabric of India and Muslim appeasement! U can't look beyond your nose
Shame on you Congress
Aarif Mohammad Khan ❤️❤️❤️
Muslim personal law board ne ye to bata diya ki iddat khatm to ab nafqa (guzara bhatta) shohar nahi dega lekin baap ki wirasat me orat ka jo hissa hota h wo kaha gaya. Or hr musalman ladki ko apni virasat ka haq kabhi nahi chorna chahiye.
Chuslam Ki khubsurti
तभी तो लंडूइज्म वाली मुल्लो के साथ भाग जाती है 😂😂😂😂
God bless u
This law is the pure example of religious politics and pseudo-secularism jiski wajah say aaj tk UCC ka oppose hota aa raha hai.
किताब 🤣🤣
Vedas, manusmriti 😂😂
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 it's also bro...
Ye bhi unhi me se ek hai
Some countries allows Personal Laws. Personal Laws deals with civil matters of a community pertaining to marriage, divorce and inheritance. There have been many debates on implementing Uniform Civil Code in India. Hindus say that they are not governed by any personal law but by secular laws of Indian constitution. Though some Hindu laws are codified such as the Hindu Marriage Act but inheritance law of Hindus called Mitakshara and Dayabhaga law is still followed by Hindus and it has legal backing. So it is inappropriate to say that Hindus do not follow personal law. They have their own form of personal law which is not discussed by any media. In some states like Haryana, Hindus believes in Khap Panchayat which is an assembly of village elders pronouncing punishment even in criminal matters. Though Khap Panchayat has no legal status but they are very influential and has emerged as a judicial body. The Hindu code bill faced severe opposition by Hindus who now claim that they happily accepted it and that they change with time. But that’s not true, the Hindu Code Bill was met with strong opposition from Hindu religious leaders and outfits, in 1949 RSS burned effigies of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as a protest against the Hindu Code Bill. The RSS hated Dr. Ambedkar to such an extent and now it is trying to appropriate Dr. Ambedkar to win hearts of Dalits and use them in riots.
Hindus demanding Uniform Civil Code is nothing but a frustration against Muslims. They actually want to enforce their laws on Muslims. Other communities such as Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists are also governed by Hindu Marriage Act, had Muslims also followed Hindu Marriage Act then Hindus would not have raised the issue of implementing Uniform Civil Code. Why Hindus have been so intolerant towards those following their religion? Why Hindus are having problem if Muslims are following their religious laws in civil matters? In the future Hindus may also demand that Muslims must convert to Hinduism. After all I find little difference between enforcing religion and enforcing ones laws on others. How can Hindus demand to implement UCC without presenting a draft bill? Vice Chancellor of NALSAR Mr. Faizan Mustafa also said, “In 1941, a drafting committee comprising 8 members was formed under the chairmanship of (Jurist) B N Rao, that gave its report which was later debated, then a Hindu Code Bill was formed but it was not passed and compromised with Hindu Fundamentalists and diluted. Eventually Law Minister Dr B R Ambedkar had to resign over this. So even after 15 years exercise, government could not make a strong and reform law because daughter could not make copartner. That change government could bring in 2005. Still till today, Hindu laws have not been reformed and there are no uniform Hindu laws…So if government wants to bring reform in Muslim laws. It should make a committee of experts, wait for their report, open it for public debate then make any law.”
Yeah bro....why hindus are doing this ??? Ask yourself....
अब ucc ले आने के बाद मुस्लिम पर्सनल लॉ बोर्ड भी खत्म,,,,कोर्ट को किसी धार्मिक पुस्तक का संज्ञान नही लेना होगा
You forgot to mention the name of the Chapter
It is from Surah An nisa
chapter 4
@@rabiahussain4338 I know that
Gadaro ki bahut jale gi🤣🤣🤣
भगवा अतंकवादी आरएसएस गद्दार
Not able to watch the episode, some technical problem ?
why have we allowed other legal system to exist in this country? What kind of equality is it?
पहली बात मेहर निक़ाह के वक़्त दी जाती हैं
दूसरी बात इद्दत 3 माह नही हैं 4 माह 10 दिन या गर्भावस्था होने पर बच्चे के जन्म होने तक
3.)तीन तलाक़ एक बार मे दिया ही नही दिया जा सकता(अल्लाह के नज़दीक सबसे नापसन्दीदा काम जो इस्लाम मे जायज़ भी हैं वो तलाक़ हैं
4.) हलाला का इस्लाम की किस किताब मे ज़िक्र हैं (हलाला जैसी कोई चीज़ इस्लाम में हैं ही नही )
किसी बात से असहमत हो तो अपनी दलील पेश करो यदि तुम सच्चे हो क़ुरान या हद्दिस से
Islam is a great religion.
😶
Haa ran d khana mujhe bhi achchhaa lagta hai
@@jokershayaristatus इसी लिए इस्लाम तुम्हारे रंदीखने बैंड करवाता है । तभी तो तुम्हें सरिया से दिक्कत होती है
Atakanwadi ka bnaya hua religion hai... Worst dharm h
Great religion but what about followers
Galat baat kahi Aap ne ..
sirf iddat tak nahi balke us ki dusri shadi hone tak
Agar shadi nahi hoti hai to marne tak Dena honga
In today's world, why there is alimony when everyone is capable of doing job or something else. I think this law must be changed and alimony should only be given when she is disabled or having custody of his biological minor child.
Watch SACHWALA EXMUSLIM On TH-cam 🤣🤣
@J stallion लगता है अब्दुल की नाजायज़ संतान हो इसलिए झांट जली हुई है तेरी
UCC will remove all garbage from our society.
Exmuslim sahil aur sachwala ki vedio dekho.kuraan aur hadeesh ko acche se explain kr denge.
Don't follow venomous religious scholars, read Quran, alimony is must, if she has no other means. And you expect your wife to be less, educated, be at home, and after divorce start earning herself, islam never ask women to earn, if she'swillingto do it, then its ok.
Secularism 😂
Secularism there is anti cow slaughter law 😂😂😂
@@Farhan_siddiqui624 yes we want intruder head hunting permission as well from North East but secularism not allowing it
Nicely
Aur tum liberals fir bhi muslim ki chat te ho. Shrm kro.
this is the definition of Liberal according to google :"relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.".. tumne kya padh liya hai ?
@@23Anirudh yaha to defination hi badl di inn logo ne to bjp privatisation krti hai to liberals virodh krte hai equal rights ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Citizenship dene ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Reform lane ki bt krte hai to liberals virodh krte hai. Bhai tune kya dekha fir inn liberals me jo iss definition me likha hai. India ke liberals duniya ke liberals se alg hai yaha sarkar ka virodh Krna hi liberal gang ka km hai chahe kuch bhi ho
लगी पडी है खालाओ कितो
अब उनही को आगे आके ucc की मांग करणी चाहिये
🙏🇮🇳🚩 भारत माता की जय
Aaj toh kitna bhi virodh kr lo koi glt chiz ka fekuram zukega nhi. Or kuch bolega bhi nhi
To farm laws kaise wapis huye???
Thanks lallontop
Apne hame ye bataya
Y we need to give vote BJP.......
Islam khatre me 🤣🤣🤣
Land pujwe Tera hindu dharm khatre me hai
Islam kabhi khatre me nahi ho sakta... Qki hume apne Allah pe wishwash hai
Aaj ko tum kahte ho ki londa londiya sab barabar hai, aur dono jobs bhi kar sakte he, equal rights he, to salo ye konsa gatiya kanoon he ki talaq ke baad Londiya ko paisa do ya property do, yaha pe ye equal nahi he, kyuki yaha pe womens abla he, bechari he, kamjor he, bhikhari he, dukhi he, etc, wah kya soch he re tumhaari.....hatt thu, aaj ka ensan pada likha educated gwar......🤣
@SP R sabhi jagah sunne ko mil jaayega hidu khatre me 😂😂hai
@SP R to tum mante ho, mens and womens equal nahi he, kaho sari womens kamjor he, abla he, Jobs ke layak nahi, Aasahay he, self depended nahi he, fir to banta he paisa dena, aur dena bhi chahiye 100% right......🤣🤣🤣🤣
9:00 Rajiv Gandhi Blunder.
Sabdi badi samasya si desh banaye gaye personal law board hi hai uniform civil code is must, tabhi congress ka ye haal hai, Galat ka samarthan kiya congress ne
Sare confusion ki jad 2:46 me h. " MAHAR Ki RAKAM" Ye wo rakam h jo sadi k wakt ladki tay karti h ki es ladke se sadi karne ka mai ETNA Rupay lungi. Agar ladke ko manjur h to mujhse sadi kare warna aage ka rasta dekhe. Esi ko na samjh pane k wajah se ham muslim ka etna beda gark hua h. Arab countries me ladkiya sadi k liye MAHAR me lakho rupay aur to aur koi ladki to pura ka pura ghar hi mangti h MAHAR me. ...khuda na kare ki divorce ho..... Magar.. agar divorce hua to wo sare rakam,ghar jo us ladki ne MAHAR me liya h wo to us ladki ka hi h aur wo ladki us rakam,ghar ko le chali jayegi.
PPT [PDF] BHI DIYA KARIYE SIR !!!!
Maza aagaya
This is nothing but just politics.