I can't explain how much your classes have been helping me, you make this subject a way more easier to understand and your explanations are excellent. Thank you so much for sharing it
Hi Ben, in the original paper by Angrist and coauthors, they have one more assumption that is SUTVA, which implies that potential outcomes for each person i are unrelated to the treatment status of other individuals. I wonder why you drop this assumption in your lecture. Thank you for the nice lecture btw!
I can't explain how much your classes have been helping me, you make this subject a way more easier to understand and your explanations are excellent. Thank you so much for sharing it
Happy to hear! Spread the word.
Thank you Professor Elsner! I enjoy every video you posted.
Thank you very much for this video! I wish my teacher was as clear as you are!
Hi Ben, in the original paper by Angrist and coauthors, they have one more assumption that is SUTVA, which implies that potential outcomes for each person i are unrelated to the treatment status of other individuals. I wonder why you drop this assumption in your lecture. Thank you for the nice lecture btw!
@@shinaction2666 SUTVA should be in LATE II, i.e. in the next video
@@ben_elsner Thank you very much! Will check it out!
Great GREAT video !! Thank you so much for sharing it . Looking forward to watch the next ones :D
How ATT from one sided compliance is different from ATE on treated