I do wonder when I see reviews like this why someone would take this chance or even set the camera on a rocky surface next to water. I would have at the very least a hand strap attached to it.
I got it and it is better than my old Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 (old one, no VR). The only lens I will be adding will be the 70-200 f/2.8 S when it becomes available.
Chris! would really love to see the Tamron 17-28mm 2.8 vs the Sony Gmaster 16-35mm 2.8. With a $1300 price diffrence its a comparison ALOT of us want to see.
@@aussie8114 i honestly think if size and weigh are not put in consider when producing lenses, all manufacturers can make lenses with perfect image quality.
Yes it was :-) Their humour just makes their videos stand out even more from all the shouters out there. It reminded me of a video they did a while back on how to create smooth videos and cuts with using B-roll footage. The intro to that video also was a round-up on how not to do it, hectic, fast cuts, and afterwards we saw Jordan in front of the laptop going "What have I done?!".
I’ve been on the fence about this purchasing this lens and I do believe that I’ll make the commitment and go forth with it! Thanks Chris for the remarkable review!
Had a chance to try this lens out last weekend. It's stunning. I've been using my 24-70 2.8 VR with FTZ but this release is very tempting formal the reasons you've outlined in this video.
Just booked mine for the Z6 its a very expensive lens ... But what needs to be done has to be done so can't complain and glass upgrades are always worth it..
When this review started out I was confused and looking for an afro. All fun aside , it’s looking like Nikon is developing some very nice performing lenses. Especially for video. No focus breathing is nice . I understand they are focus by wire so how easy is it to do manual focus pulls with this lens . Also what’s the word on Nikon updating the firmware in all their Zed mount lenses for good manual focus pulls in video ? And how is this lens when zooming during video? Does it stay in focus? Par focal I guess is what that is called . Thanks for your great reviews
Ugh. Just ordered the f/2.8 after debating with self over the f/4 for several months. Just realized that the lens extends externally and isn’t internally housed like I hoped. I do look forward to owning it. Thanks for the review.
Sony is FAR ahead of Nikon with respect to mirrorless lenses. There are many, many, many more available, and among them are some of the best lenses in the world (90mm macro, 24mm f/1.4, etc.). What makes you think Nikon will not only catch up but surpass them? Even if Sony and all 3rd parties completely quit making E-mount lenses for 3 years, Nikon wouldn't have caught up by then.
The biggest problem with this lens is how the 24-70mm f/4 is so damned good, it's hard to justify the upgrade because I'm so happy with what I already have. Nikon is killing it with these lenses.
You do good reviews. You cover a lot. No mention of image dimensionality but can see from the samples it does not look flat. I do wonder if buying the Z6 whether the f4 is a far wiser choice when considering its about $900 when purchased with the body vs about $3,200 for the f2.8. However for the Z7 the f2.8 is a fine match.
Would be extremely interesting to see you test this lens out on say the Z6 in more difficult low light situations like concerts and other events. Nice well rounded review! And the intro had me falling off my chair, that was spot on.
It would be nice if you would mention if the manual focus for video is fly by wire and whether you can set it to linear somehow for repeatable focus changes. It would also be interesting if you would film the episode on Nikon Z6 and this lens so we would see more how it performs in video. There could also be focal lenght and aperture somewhere in the corner. Thanks anyway
I can appreciate the comment about the focus speed compared to the older DSLR versions... the 2.8 lenses have always been tremendously fast focusing lenses! A lot of professional photographers who have become accustom to that will appreciate the heads up!
you are saying the auto focus speed or response is slow, can this be because in a dslr there is a Seperate focus electronics (engine) which makes the speed faster than a mirror less camera, which presumably would do everything off the main chip from the sensor itself, and hence have a slower response due to prioritizing the time of the chip to many duties.
I would say that the Z 24-70 f/2.8 S is probably Nikons greatest 24-70. Maybe not necessarily the best among what's out there for other brands, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the best one yet out of the 3 I've owned (first the older 2.8G ED version, then the 2.8E version--the most current F-mount version, and now the Z version).
Truly fantastic optics in this lens. But what's up with those sensor reflections? I've honestly never seen that in any other camera or in any of my mirrorless cameras shooting into heavy backlight or flair. Is this a problem for this lens in particular because of the rear element? Does this occur on other cameras?
Hi Chris, nice review. I noticed you said that the 24-70 2.8 S has a bit slower autofocus. Is there any chance you can cast some light on that very important issue some more?
Coming from the old "Beast" (28-70) I am very pleased about the lens and specialy about the low-light capability with the in-camera integrated stabilisation. It's a pitty that there are no autofocus speed (near to infinity -> how many [ms]? or 2m->infinity) values exists to compare the lenses.
Reasonable, supportive and uplifting.... No, No Chris, your hair is not turning gray on the edges. It is just old chromatic aberrations. But a good review and comments ;-)
Hi DPReview (Chris & Jordan), thank you very much for your extremely useful work. I wondered, related to Nikon if you know anything about what they promised us all about the impressive update that they were going to provide us this summer. I have acquired a Z6 in the hope of being able to finally record on ProRes Raw, as I suppose many of us. It would be exciting if you could create a chapter talking about what is known so far. I am confused about, that no one talks about it, and that Nikon maintains, now for more than six months, this silence. Ps. The 50/1.8 S is amazing too.
Hi Chris, I know you are busy with photoshoots, family, filming reviews etc. but i really need your guidance here. I have ordered fuji xt30 and its going to arrive on 8th august approx. i was quite sure about the fuji xt30 with 16mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2 untill i saw videos on sony a6400. I m mainly into photography and have no interest in vlogging or videography. My main concerns are image quality, ergonomics (comfortable to handle), ease of use. Plus the camera and lens combination that i have been planning is expensive on fujifilm side compared to sonya6400+sigma 1.6mm f1.4 and sigma 56mm f1.4. I would really appreciate it if you please help me on this as soon as you can. Thank you so much Chris
The Fuji is better built, has far better handling, more rugged, better supported so stick with what you ordered and forget comparing any cameras. it only distracts you from what really matters; light, composition, and point of view. If you capture a great image or a poor image, it is not the camera, it is you. Every camera made today is perfectly capable of award-winning images. Most of the differences now are just handling and a few features that make no difference.
Nice review as always, Chris! As a landscape and product STILLS X-T3 shooter (no video), I have been debating on selling my Fuji kit (reluctantly), and moving into FF, specifically the Nikon Z7 (or the Sony a7Rlll). Since I shoot 99% tripod-mounted, neither IBIS nor video interests me. So, my question is, for large print output (around 24"x 36" prints), how much of an improvement in terms of image sharpness, detail rendition, dynamic range, base ISO performance, etc., would I see over the already excellent X-T3? And, pardon my phonetic ignorance, but why pronounce "Z" as "Zed"? Thanks!
Nice review. I'm disappointed at the AF speed compared to the DSLR versions though. I love the top display panel and the general overall compactness compared to the DSLR variants
6:52 $7k sitting on a railing above a stream all nonchalant like! :D Definitely disappointing to hear about the autofocus seeming to be slow... most of the Z-series so far are pretty darn good. Loving my f4 version so far, and would be great to hear more about what makes the 2.8 worth the premium (understanding of course the obvious).
Not backed by any scientific measurements, I actually feel like the S focuses faster than my (non-vr) 2.8 f-mount version. I feel like the S goes straight to the focus point whereas the older one hunts a bit before settling in. Anyway, just my opinion.
Great review confirming the lens would be very useful for me. Just the price needs to come down a little for me to justify spending to add to/replace my 24-70 f2.8 F-mount VR & 24-70 f4 S lenses
Just bought it and cannot wait to compare it with my 24-70 2.8 VR. Being light means a lighter backpack... that's already good news.
5 ปีที่แล้ว +2
Guys, your reviews are engaging and fun with some good information peppered in, but is it so hard to use the gear for its primary purpose when reviewing it? The 24-70 f/2.8 is a photojournalist/event photographers (formerly also wedding, although primes seem to be all the rage today) main workhorse, I'm sure there are events that you could shoot and get some real-life experience, for example with the autofocus speed etc. Shooting still life and landscapes is all and good, but people usually don't buy a 2.8 zoom to do that.
When you say it focuses a bit slower than the DSLR versions of the lens I wonder if you're talking about the DSLR lenses mounted on DSLR's or adapted onto the mirrorless bodies. The Z6 and Z7 aren't known to be fast focusing so hopefully it's the fault of the bodies and not this awesome new lens.
Great video as always team. Some feedback though: I think this video had a few too many shots of Chris in the park talking to the camera while just holding the z6 in his hand or it beside him on a rail. I think that your other videos do a better job of balancing these shots with shots of usage.
Great video ! For the slower AF speed it could be the camera? z6/7 could have a slower AF system , one day on a sports Z camera it can be blazing fast.. I had a AFI 400mm f2,8 IFED once, it has no extra "intelligence" for smooth focus start and stops, sliding smooth movents as the newer AFS motors, just rough and provides everyting what a camera demands, on a D200 , D300s,D2Xs, is was very fast, on the old F90x extremely fast, slow on the D3X, D7000, D100,D80,D700... I think there is hope... AF control can make the difference and may differ per camera model
Hi Guys Can you help me decide ?? For a better result of sharpness in my photos, which combination is better? Z6 + 24-70 f2.8 or Z7 + 24-70 f4 ???? Unfortunately I have no money for 2.8 and Z7... lol.... Thanks
I would go Z6 + F2.8. You're probably going to upgrade the body in a few years but this lens should last 4 times that, and have a better resale value if you ever decide to sell it. If the slower AF speed is okay with you , the Z6 F2.8 combo should offer some great low light capability and less noise overall.
Video of the 24-70 Z lens is soft and low resolution. Why is there edge fall-off of light, sharpness, and vignetting on a lens with such a large mount???
Hey Chris, nice informative video thanks, but not being familiar with you before, that beginning almost had me skipping until I realised it was a joke 😂 Cheers
I have the 24-70 f/4 and cannot see myself giving a ton of money for 1 stop of light and twice the weight. With the low light capability of this sensor, I would gladly take a 1 stop hit on the ISO. I can think of maybe 3 smarter ways to use the $1300+ difference.
Reasonable, supportive and uplifting.
Come to think of it: He didn't tell us where to leave those other comments...
Andy Seward sounds like an underwire bra😊
@@kevins2684 Haha what an idiot. You kevin .
No,you’re a beast Chris. That intro was hilarious.
Did anyone else freak out seeing a $2k lens and $3k camera balanced on the bridge?
6" wide camera on 6" wide piece of wood you mean? no basic physics.
@@rollandelliott I would find a way to knock it off!
@@rollandelliott You mean, a maximum of 3" of room for it to move before it falls down? That's pretty scary.
I do wonder when I see reviews like this why someone would take this chance or even set the camera on a rocky surface next to water. I would have at the very least a hand strap attached to it.
Yea my first reaction !!!
I got it and it is better than my old Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 (old one, no VR).
The only lens I will be adding will be the 70-200 f/2.8 S when it becomes available.
The out-of-focus area is very smooth. The new S line lens are really impressive.
Thank you for always not doing the clickbait crap and just producing high quality content.
Chris! would really love to see the Tamron 17-28mm 2.8 vs the Sony Gmaster 16-35mm 2.8.
With a $1300 price diffrence its a comparison ALOT of us want to see.
If you can't test them all on the same bodies, the results would be more flawed than the standard non-scientific comparison.
Nikon is Really doing AMAZING job on the S lenses ! They are all sharp and perfect
The size is huge tho
@@Goonercry it's a 2.8 zoom....what do you expect
@@AcidicDelusion i mean compared to other brands like canon and tamron, it noticeably bigger
Not sure about the dimensionality on all of them. Sharpness is only one criteria.
@@aussie8114 i honestly think if size and weigh are not put in consider when producing lenses, all manufacturers can make lenses with perfect image quality.
Was that the z7ii the whole time or did you use the z6ii as well.
This lens has been glued to my Z6 since I got it. The best 24-70 f2.8 I've ever owned, and I've had several.
Nice job boys.... As always... What truly blows me away , with all the new choices for video work , Jordan continues to rock the GH5....😎
Where did you see tulips in August? Very interesting.
That intro was damn Hilarious 😂👌
Ahh, now that you mention it, I see it. I thought it was Polin.
Yes it was :-) Their humour just makes their videos stand out even more from all the shouters out there.
It reminded me of a video they did a while back on how to create smooth videos and cuts with using B-roll footage. The intro to that video also was a round-up on how not to do it, hectic, fast cuts, and afterwards we saw Jordan in front of the laptop going "What have I done?!".
Resembled more with Peter McCanon.. 😉🤘🏼
Mocks so many photography-related TH-camrs and I love it.
y'all just destroyed half of photo youtube with that cold open
If I could thumbs up this comment 1k times, I would. Gawd I hate those in-your-face TH-camrs...
I’ve been on the fence about this purchasing this lens and I do believe that I’ll make the commitment and go forth with it! Thanks Chris for the remarkable review!
Thanks for the video! My 24-70 2.8s fails to recognize face/eye. is the function only a camera side? or a lens might be damaged?
wish you had compared it to the Z f4 version for those considering upgrade or not
Had a chance to try this lens out last weekend. It's stunning. I've been using my 24-70 2.8 VR with FTZ but this release is very tempting formal the reasons you've outlined in this video.
Just booked mine for the Z6 its a very expensive lens ... But what needs to be done has to be done so can't complain and glass upgrades are always worth it..
When this review started out I was confused and looking for an afro. All fun aside , it’s looking like Nikon is developing some very nice performing lenses. Especially for video. No focus breathing is nice . I understand they are focus by wire so how easy is it to do manual focus pulls with this lens . Also what’s the word on Nikon updating the firmware in all their Zed mount lenses for good manual focus pulls in video ? And how is this lens when zooming during video? Does it stay in focus? Par focal I guess is what that is called .
Thanks for your great reviews
Can you do a review on that Techart PRO Autofocus Adapter for Sony E-Mount to nikon z mount with some sony lenes on the nikon z system?
Yes I too would like to see that. Maybe the 16-35mm GM on a Z7 ? and compare the 35mm range of the Sony to the 35mm of the Z 24-70
Ugh. Just ordered the f/2.8 after debating with self over the f/4 for several months. Just realized that the lens extends externally and isn’t internally housed like I hoped. I do look forward to owning it. Thanks for the review.
At this quality of execution and roadmap, Nikon will be go to ecosystem for FF mirrorless in 3 years!
WTF GRAMMAR FAIL
I don't think so 😎
@@soundknight And your "sentence" has good grammar?
Sony is FAR ahead of Nikon with respect to mirrorless lenses. There are many, many, many more available, and among them are some of the best lenses in the world (90mm macro, 24mm f/1.4, etc.). What makes you think Nikon will not only catch up but surpass them? Even if Sony and all 3rd parties completely quit making E-mount lenses for 3 years, Nikon wouldn't have caught up by then.
@@soundknight Sorry about that but I thought TH-camrs like yourselves are smart enough to understand what I meant!
Don't care what people say you guys are the best gear reviewers (not DP review) you and Jordan, congrats guys.
I've had this combo for a few months, and must say I love the lens. :)
The biggest problem with this lens is how the 24-70mm f/4 is so damned good, it's hard to justify the upgrade because I'm so happy with what I already have.
Nikon is killing it with these lenses.
Exactly my problem I can't justify the upgrade, I rather buy the 70-200 2.8 VR S
In Low light f2.8 is better in my opinion?
@@saabvanderlinden9214 yes
Hey Chris the day u left TCSTV I left it too.....
You do good reviews. You cover a lot. No mention of image dimensionality but can see from the samples it does not look flat. I do wonder if buying the Z6 whether the f4 is a far wiser choice when considering its about $900 when purchased with the body vs about $3,200 for the f2.8. However for the Z7 the f2.8 is a fine match.
Would be extremely interesting to see you test this lens out on say the Z6 in more difficult low light situations like concerts and other events. Nice well rounded review! And the intro had me falling off my chair, that was spot on.
i want the music you used in Video during showing images
It would be nice if you would mention if the manual focus for video is fly by wire and whether you can set it to linear somehow for repeatable focus changes. It would also be interesting if you would film the episode on Nikon Z6 and this lens so we would see more how it performs in video. There could also be focal lenght and aperture somewhere in the corner.
Thanks anyway
well explained. but is it really worth the upgrade from the f4?
Wishing you a reasonably supportive and uplifting day Chris!
This is a reasonable, supportive, uplifting and well mannered comment.
Excellent, well balanced not-to-technical review. Well done Chris.
I can appreciate the comment about the focus speed compared to the older DSLR versions... the 2.8 lenses have always been tremendously fast focusing lenses! A lot of professional photographers who have become accustom to that will appreciate the heads up!
you are saying the auto focus speed or response is slow, can this be because in a dslr there is a Seperate focus electronics (engine) which makes the speed faster than a mirror less camera, which presumably would do everything off the main chip from the sensor itself, and hence have a slower response due to prioritizing the time of the chip to many duties.
damn, what shoes is Chris rocking in this video? those are so cool.
I would say that the Z 24-70 f/2.8 S is probably Nikons greatest 24-70. Maybe not necessarily the best among what's out there for other brands, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the best one yet out of the 3 I've owned (first the older 2.8G ED version, then the 2.8E version--the most current F-mount version, and now the Z version).
Truly fantastic optics in this lens. But what's up with those sensor reflections? I've honestly never seen that in any other camera or in any of my mirrorless cameras shooting into heavy backlight or flair. Is this a problem for this lens in particular because of the rear element? Does this occur on other cameras?
Nice review. It also appears to be the best 24-70 2.8 on any mount ever made.
Its the newest so anything else would have been shit...
@@bjure8111 True, but if you are using a Sony it may be many years until you get a lens of similar caliber.
What do you think of Z6 for video? I see you are using gh5 which is surprising giving the Z6 is full frame and offers 4K 30fps.
I can go from EOS M50 + Sigma 16mm 1.4 to Z7 II and this lens in a month but I'm wondering what the Z8 will be.
Basically an infomercial. Maybe someone actually will show how specific settings affect specific results? Still looking for that video.
How much advantage is 2.8 against F4 as the price gap is too much. Also suggest on compatibility of F mount Tamron 24-70 2.8.
Hi Chris, nice review. I noticed you said that the 24-70 2.8 S has a bit slower autofocus. Is there any chance you can cast some light on that very important issue some more?
Coming from the old "Beast" (28-70) I am very pleased about the lens and specialy about the low-light capability with the in-camera integrated stabilisation.
It's a pitty that there are no autofocus speed (near to infinity -> how many [ms]? or 2m->infinity) values exists to compare the lenses.
Been waiting for this review for months guys!!!! Thank you!!
Reasonable, supportive and uplifting.... No, No Chris, your hair is not turning gray on the edges. It is just old chromatic aberrations. But a good review and comments ;-)
Would either 24-70 lens work on the Z50. Would it be worth it to ut one of these lenses on the Z50?
Hi DPReview (Chris & Jordan), thank you very much for your extremely useful work. I wondered, related to Nikon if you know anything about what they promised us all about the impressive update that they were going to provide us this summer. I have acquired a Z6 in the hope of being able to finally record on ProRes Raw, as I suppose many of us. It would be exciting if you could create a chapter talking about what is known so far. I am confused about, that no one talks about it, and that Nikon maintains, now for more than six months, this silence. Ps. The 50/1.8 S is amazing too.
Damn, that intro sounded like FroKnows$hit 😂
Oh fuck i cant unrelate to that
zapiollin He $hits RAW.
will it work with D7200
Do you think it focuses faster than it’s f4 sibling?
What was this video recorded on? GH5?
Jordan, is this shot with the 10-25?
Was that a walk and talk gimbal shot near the end, or did Jordan lean to moonwalk on grass? If so, what gimbal or kind of grass was that?
I just picked this lens up and I love it!! Now - where the hell is the 70-200?
Hi Chris,
I know you are busy with photoshoots, family, filming reviews etc. but i really need your guidance here.
I have ordered fuji xt30 and its going to arrive on 8th august approx.
i was quite sure about the fuji xt30 with 16mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2 untill i saw videos on sony a6400.
I m mainly into photography and have no interest in vlogging or videography. My main concerns are image quality, ergonomics (comfortable to handle), ease of use.
Plus the camera and lens combination that i have been planning is expensive on fujifilm side compared to sonya6400+sigma 1.6mm f1.4 and sigma 56mm f1.4.
I would really appreciate it if you please help me on this as soon as you can.
Thank you so much Chris
The Fuji is better built, has far better handling, more rugged, better supported so stick with what you ordered and forget comparing any cameras. it only distracts you from what really matters; light, composition, and point of view. If you capture a great image or a poor image, it is not the camera, it is you. Every camera made today is perfectly capable of award-winning images. Most of the differences now are just handling and a few features that make no difference.
That screen on the lens looks great!
Hey guys, did you have time to have a look at the new Canon RF 24-70 f/2.8, maybe compare it with the Nikon counterpart?
Chris and I still haven’t seen a sample of the Canon 24-70mm F2.8 IS yet, but we’re hoping to shoot out all the new options.
Jordan @ TCSTV
Nice review as always, Chris! As a landscape and product STILLS X-T3 shooter (no video), I have been debating on selling my Fuji kit (reluctantly), and moving into FF, specifically the Nikon Z7 (or the Sony a7Rlll). Since I shoot 99% tripod-mounted, neither IBIS nor video interests me. So, my question is, for large print output (around 24"x 36" prints), how much of an improvement in terms of image sharpness, detail rendition, dynamic range, base ISO performance, etc., would I see over the already excellent X-T3? And, pardon my phonetic ignorance, but why pronounce "Z" as "Zed"? Thanks!
Is that sensor dust @ 6.15?
Nice review. I'm disappointed at the AF speed compared to the DSLR versions though. I love the top display panel and the general overall compactness compared to the DSLR variants
6:52 $7k sitting on a railing above a stream all nonchalant like! :D
Definitely disappointing to hear about the autofocus seeming to be slow... most of the Z-series so far are pretty darn good. Loving my f4 version so far, and would be great to hear more about what makes the 2.8 worth the premium (understanding of course the obvious).
Not backed by any scientific measurements, I actually feel like the S focuses faster than my (non-vr) 2.8 f-mount version. I feel like the S goes straight to the focus point whereas the older one hunts a bit before settling in. Anyway, just my opinion.
My copy of the lens locks on focus very quickly. Perhaps Chris was using a Canadian copy which tend to run a bit slower in the cold weather.
Which one is better, this one or canon rf?
I have a older 24-70 f2.8. It does not have vr. Do you think the z lense is much better?
Minimal focus breathing at all the focal lengths?
Great review confirming the lens would be very useful for me. Just the price needs to come down a little for me to justify spending to add to/replace my 24-70 f2.8 F-mount VR & 24-70 f4 S lenses
This is how you do a proper review !
nikon z 28-75 f2.8 please review sir
Just bought it and cannot wait to compare it with my 24-70 2.8 VR. Being light means a lighter backpack... that's already good news.
Guys, your reviews are engaging and fun with some good information peppered in, but is it so hard to use the gear for its primary purpose when reviewing it? The 24-70 f/2.8 is a photojournalist/event photographers (formerly also wedding, although primes seem to be all the rage today) main workhorse, I'm sure there are events that you could shoot and get some real-life experience, for example with the autofocus speed etc. Shooting still life and landscapes is all and good, but people usually don't buy a 2.8 zoom to do that.
When you say it focuses a bit slower than the DSLR versions of the lens I wonder if you're talking about the DSLR lenses mounted on DSLR's or adapted onto the mirrorless bodies. The Z6 and Z7 aren't known to be fast focusing so hopefully it's the fault of the bodies and not this awesome new lens.
I’ll wait for the Tamron 2.8 version, that will be more affordable. Thanks for the vid 👍🏻
2022.
Great video as always team.
Some feedback though:
I think this video had a few too many shots of Chris in the park talking to the camera while just holding the z6 in his hand or it beside him on a rail.
I think that your other videos do a better job of balancing these shots with shots of usage.
Love the review. Very informative! Thanks
I'm really enjoying this lens for video use with my Z6 but man, focus by wire sucks for video work. Great review man.
Would like to see this lens compared to Canon 28-70 F2
Great video ! For the slower AF speed it could be the camera? z6/7 could have a slower AF system , one day on a sports Z camera it can be blazing fast.. I had a AFI 400mm f2,8 IFED once, it has no extra "intelligence" for smooth focus start and stops, sliding smooth movents as the newer AFS motors, just rough and provides everyting what a camera demands, on a D200 , D300s,D2Xs, is was very fast, on the old F90x extremely fast, slow on the D3X, D7000, D100,D80,D700... I think there is hope... AF control can make the difference and may differ per camera model
Nice vlog. Informative. The idea is to tell ""a story"" and inform. You don't need the first seconds for attention.
Well done Nikon!
Hi Guys
Can you help me decide ??
For a better result of sharpness in my photos, which combination is better?
Z6 + 24-70 f2.8 or Z7 + 24-70 f4 ????
Unfortunately I have no money for 2.8 and Z7... lol....
Thanks
I would go Z6 + F2.8. You're probably going to upgrade the body in a few years but this lens should last 4 times that, and have a better resale value if you ever decide to sell it. If the slower AF speed is okay with you , the Z6 F2.8 combo should offer some great low light capability and less noise overall.
If i use this lens with sony a7r iv .Which mount i use....plz plz plz help me
You can't mount a Nikon Z lens on the Sony E mount. You can mount Sony lenses on the Nikon Z cameras.
I am waiting for the Tamrons and Sigmas before diving into the Z-Mount life... Otherwise that is a great lens
Norman Eshuchi the z6 is very Good. Only XQD is still very expensive
Better than Canon eos r6?
Good review, thanks
Coolness from Chris! Thanks so much for helpful video, you guys! Cheers,
Make review for t7 compare d3500
With cheap prime lenses.
Thanks
I thumb-up the video on my first sight of the intro.
Awesome review. I would like to own this lens one day. ✌
Video of the 24-70 Z lens is soft and low resolution.
Why is there edge fall-off of light, sharpness, and vignetting on a lens with such a large mount???
Love all y'all's videos
Hey Chris, nice informative video thanks, but not being familiar with you before, that beginning almost had me skipping until I realised it was a joke 😂
Cheers
Great info as always, Sir.
A Sage shirt now - much better action than the Loop.. ;)
I have the 24-70 f/4 and cannot see myself giving a ton of money for 1 stop of light and twice the weight. With the low light capability of this sensor, I would gladly take a 1 stop hit on the ISO. I can think of maybe 3 smarter ways to use the $1300+ difference.
just gonna wait for the 85 1.8s..
You will feel differently about that once you own the lens. I feel its worth every penny paired with my Z7. 😊
I love your reviews, tone and humour. Very helpful when trying to decide which system to go for. Thanks!
Love the work y'all do.
Is it sharper then the F4?
A little bit yes.