I think, the questions should be different ones. When can we afford to build something that has a significantly higher collision energy? Where can we build one? Might there be an advantage to building one in orbit, in a Lagrange point, in a rock in the asteroid belt?
@@philippzimmerer1280 If we can construct such large structure in space, let alone in a Lagrange point, I don't think money would a problem at that point. Building anything in space is just expansive rn. I think FermiLab at Chicago has a smaller particle collider.
@@potatonoodlebear8035 Yes, we're definitely not talking "start construction next week" for a space accelerator. Or in a decade, if we're realistic. My guess would be that we will see two more generations of terrestrial accelerators before we go spacebound. There's plenty of colliders in various locations around the world. Fermilab has the Tevatron, which is the second largest to date. CERN built other accelerators before, which are now operating as pre-accelerators for the LHC. Energies and luminosities, as well as detector capabilities have been improved over the decades of course. LHC is just the (current) pinnacle of what physicists have been doing for the last 70 or so years :)
I saw the Smashing Particles in college before they got big and accelerated to tours outside Illinois and went to Europe. Despite all my rage I’m still just a proton in a tube. Still awesome
Expensive than Printer ink? Definitely.. but is that a joke I didn’t get? Can someone explain the comparison to the cost of such an easily available everyday commodity?
Printer ink cost is insanly high, this is because thats how printers companies makes profit. This is because most fo the printers are sold at a loss, so they make up, by selling ink at a higher price.
GET ON IT AMERICA HOLY SHIT. So tired of being in a country where seemingly everything great is in our past :( Like holy shit, we could push science so far so easily if we would just get out of our own way...
One probably really simple thing I have never heard explained about E=MC2 is the actual values. What I mean is Energy in Watts, Degrees, Newtons, Pounds lol. Equals mass in Grams, Pounds, Bananas? And even the speed of light in Mph, Kph, meters per second? What units of measurement are used in the equation? I'm sure there are options like energy in Watts requires mass in micro grams whereas energy in newton's requires mass in bananas. Obviously I'm no physist but I think my question makes sense. I hope
@@elliotmoore2598 thanks Elliot. I'm glad I won't need a decalitre to kangaroo power converter. But more seriously I've heard that equation hundreds of times. But never any comment about the values used. Much appreciated.
I can't wait for the FCC. This decade planing, (given politicians provide funding)next decade building. And providing cutting edge research beyond this century.
Instead of building a new particle accelerator? Can't we Upgrade, and build off of the preexisting particle accelerator? 🤔 So we don't have to build an entire other one?
I love this series so much that I hate it. Cliffhangers don't belong in science! I know this information but I wanna know it again in one sitting dammit!!!
This machine is complicated, too complicated, it only runs every so often, so it's most likely the most advance and complex machine that is hardly used, interesting. All for the name of science.
You are playing God and you are not! Dear lord we rebuke these atheist to believes change there addictions of trying to be you now in your almighty name Jesus Christ Help us from these demons lord! There about to blow up all human beings fools
Do we need a bigger, more powerful accelerator after the LHC?
Definitely. But do we have enough money though?
I think, the questions should be different ones.
When can we afford to build something that has a significantly higher collision energy? Where can we build one? Might there be an advantage to building one in orbit, in a Lagrange point, in a rock in the asteroid belt?
@@philippzimmerer1280 If we can construct such large structure in space, let alone in a Lagrange point, I don't think money would a problem at that point. Building anything in space is just expansive rn.
I think FermiLab at Chicago has a smaller particle collider.
@@potatonoodlebear8035 Yes, we're definitely not talking "start construction next week" for a space accelerator. Or in a decade, if we're realistic. My guess would be that we will see two more generations of terrestrial accelerators before we go spacebound.
There's plenty of colliders in various locations around the world. Fermilab has the Tevatron, which is the second largest to date. CERN built other accelerators before, which are now operating as pre-accelerators for the LHC. Energies and luminosities, as well as detector capabilities have been improved over the decades of course. LHC is just the (current) pinnacle of what physicists have been doing for the last 70 or so years :)
It's doubtful it would produce much in the way of results. The LHC has NOT proven much of anything. Ask Sabine Hossenfelder.
I didn’t understand anything you just said but your video is entertaining as hell and great work!
🥺🥺 man
I'm nerding out so much!! 🤓
I love this and you make it understandable. Thank you!
YEA! I also love HALO arrays that destroy the galaxy! (Stephen Hawking 2014)
do a series on the standard model
"That's putting it lightly"
That's a good one when talking about the effort it takes to make a tiny speck of anti-matter 👍🧑🔬
I saw the Smashing Particles in college before they got big and accelerated to tours outside Illinois and went to Europe. Despite all my rage I’m still just a proton in a tube.
Still awesome
Great video!
Fantastic video Julian!
Hey, super dope channel man. Nice job.
Expensive than Printer ink? Definitely.. but is that a joke I didn’t get? Can someone explain the comparison to the cost of such an easily available everyday commodity?
Printer ink cost is insanly high, this is because thats how printers companies makes profit. This is because most fo the printers are sold at a loss, so they make up, by selling ink at a higher price.
Perfect timing, morning coffee with a side of Seeker+. ☕ ☕
Baguette: 1
LHC : 0
Pigeon : chose violence that day
Are you going to give me a link to part 1? Or are you going to make me hunt for it?
GET ON IT AMERICA HOLY SHIT.
So tired of being in a country where seemingly everything great is in our past :(
Like holy shit, we could push science so far so easily if we would just get out of our own way...
Damn,that cliffhanger blue balled me pretty hard.
What about the environmental offsets of energy consumption?
Loved your comedy French accent!
One probably really simple thing I have never heard explained about E=MC2 is the actual values. What I mean is Energy in Watts, Degrees, Newtons, Pounds lol. Equals mass in Grams, Pounds, Bananas?
And even the speed of light in Mph, Kph, meters per second?
What units of measurement are used in the equation? I'm sure there are options like energy in Watts requires mass in micro grams whereas energy in newton's requires mass in bananas.
Obviously I'm no physist but I think my question makes sense. I hope
E is joules
Mass is kg
Speed is metres per second
These are the standard units for most equations in physics
@@elliotmoore2598 thanks Elliot. I'm glad I won't need a decalitre to kangaroo power converter.
But more seriously I've heard that equation hundreds of times. But never any comment about the values used. Much appreciated.
more expensive than printer ink..damn thats expensive!
**Mandela effects intensify**
I just cant wait for the next one
There trying to release the kraken
I think they are creating the speed force.
When will people stop treating hypotheses like Hawken's Radiation as theories, then use it to explain away some of the risks of the LHC?
I'm all 'bout that mass.
I can't wait for the FCC. This decade planing, (given politicians provide funding)next decade building. And providing cutting edge research beyond this century.
Hard-on Collider.
Einstein-Rosen bridge, please…
Instead of building a new particle accelerator? Can't we Upgrade, and build off of the preexisting particle accelerator? 🤔 So we don't have to build an entire other one?
You do not smash particles , you can't get a reaction out of that
I love this series so much that I hate it.
Cliffhangers don't belong in science! I know this information but I wanna know it again in one sitting dammit!!!
Bush. The family line that keeps delivering for humanity.
Sorry but why does it look so much like a picture curved in an indian temple
other than causing more mandela effects... what is the purpose of this... what will we be able to do with this new tech...
This machine is complicated, too complicated, it only runs every so often, so it's most likely the most advance and complex machine that is hardly used, interesting. All for the name of science.
To much unnecessary talking for what the title of the video pertains to, smart tho.
? p̷r̷o̷m̷o̷s̷m̷
dude genetics babies' genius's um, no but this dude you're like Ed Snowden's voice genius, what's going on here. thank you really smart. peace
Second
first
You are playing God and you are not! Dear lord we rebuke these atheist to believes change there addictions of trying to be you now in your almighty name Jesus Christ Help us from these demons lord! There about to blow up all human beings fools