JUNKYARD TURBO 4.8L vs 5.3L-WHO BUILDS LOW-BUCK BOOST BETTER?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 180

  • @alshotrodgarage4779
    @alshotrodgarage4779 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    My upull had a 2008 Denali today and I scooped a L92 complete from oil pan to intake water pump and accessories for $250!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! My dream came true today

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Sweet! Make sure you put it to GOOD use, and burn off at least 100 tires.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      SCORE!!!!

    • @JohnnyAnderson1
      @JohnnyAnderson1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@OGbqze Agreed, I bought a tire changer just for this reason

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@JohnnyAnderson1 legend💪 I wish you were my neighbor.

  • @josephhunt562
    @josephhunt562 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Great stuff as usual. My personal vote is 4.8 until you hurt it then make it a 383 rebuild!

    • @angelovasilikos7980
      @angelovasilikos7980 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love that. Always enjoyed feeling the new new performance from the upgrades.

    • @kennethpowers8995
      @kennethpowers8995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Before I got into more serious grudge racing I would juggle out stock 4.8/5.3 bottom ends without even knowing what engine it was. Throw one in, throw the FITech on it, boost it, race it, hurt it, swap in a new one. Now I’ve had an engine in the car almost 2 years and it feels weird. Lol

    • @johncrankshaft2886
      @johncrankshaft2886 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Usually the lower stroke engine is a bit more stable at RPM which is what boost likes, i have a 4.8 on my truck and a 6.2 in my Camaro. I have actually considered swapping the two out so i could boost the 4.8 as it would not only be cheaper but the 6.2 piston lands cannot handle the power the smaller 4.8s do, the truck would also benefit from the beefier lower end of the bigger engine for loads.

    • @kennethpowers8995
      @kennethpowers8995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@johncrankshaft2886 The stroke has little to do with high RPM stability. Weight of the rotating assembly and internal balance of the rotating assembly would make a much bigger difference than stroke or R/S ratio. That matters VERY little. Valvetrain construction/components are the most critical though. Honestly the way the oiling system and pan is setup is more critical to high RPM stability than stroke as well. I’ve seen some very tall stroke engines rock out 8-9-10k RPM all day long and laugh it off. But then I see engines with an imbalanced rotating assembly, or old extremely heavy cast internals with a so called “optimal” stroke/RS ratio not be able to make anything or safely spin up above ~5500.

    • @scottearl7687
      @scottearl7687 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johncrankshaft2886 you should honestly do it no Mustang or scat is gonna even come close to a boosted 4.8 Camaro, coyotes and 392 struggle to make power way before the 4.8 even sees its peak on stock block

  • @aggie91kuenemann76
    @aggie91kuenemann76 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    After watching this and many of your other videos on LS performance, you really can’t make a bad choice! I word go with the 5.3 for the higher average power numbers. But like happened to you, if you pick up what you believe to be a 5.3, but it’s really a 4.8, no reason to complain, just rev it higher!

  • @dilsher12
    @dilsher12 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love the 4.8 its the underdog, under appreciated. Lol having said that I have a 5.3 in my project and 4.8 sitting on the shop floor . Maybe one day I'll throw it in and boost it to the moon . Just to see what it does.

  • @josephstevens7880
    @josephstevens7880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You’re a beast brother. Every time someone says something stupid on the go fast ls groups, someone always pops in with “ go watch Richard holdner” . Anyways brother, I’m sure your rich already, but I do hope your properly capitalizing on your fame and success. You deserve it! And thank for all the helpful research.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rich? not so much!

    • @mcfero1
      @mcfero1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 enough to start the nova videos though. Come on man!

  • @justinp2993
    @justinp2993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have loved nearly every one of these videos, keep up the great work. Like many my focus up to this point has been turbo high effort street cars. My next project is a primarily off road Jeep, so low torque is the name of the game. I would be interested in a video looking at some NA combinations that focus on this as a goal. I am sure there is something in your archive that is applicable. Thanks again Richard for the masters class in engine combinations.

  • @trentdawg2832
    @trentdawg2832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I love my 4.8…….when I bought it the seller was under the impression that it was a 5.3, he had it in a jeep cj5 and would humiliate brand new ford raptors in multiples of 4 or more…..he would just stand on it and after about 5 seconds or so you’d see this lil red jeep emerge from a clusterfuck of $100k fords…..I seen the videos and I was sold….I personally helped him pull the motor out of the jeep…. Weeks later when I went to install it in my nova upon changing the oil pan I noticed the casting numbers on the crank and to my surprise it was just a 4.8…….I wasn’t even mad though, it had a 220/220 cam and hardened pushrods and accommodating springs….it would rev to 7500 easily……that’s why I’m putting a vortech centrifugal supercharger on it and calling it a day!!! I’m shooting for around 600hp give or take

  • @drewmurray2583
    @drewmurray2583 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice! I am starting my first LS engine swap project and I am learning a lot of the differences between the different generations and sizes. Was super surprised to see half ton gmc pickups that came with no afm even in 2009! I actually found an all aluminum 6.0 called the L76 out of a 2008 half ton that said vortec max on the doors. Building that engine now for my e46 bmw.

  • @shanelefever7704
    @shanelefever7704 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It really all comes down to budget but all I can say is the 4.8 is impressive and with boost can't go wrong really I believe if you can drive it on the street hell even daily it you made a successful machine

  • @Ugrasrava
    @Ugrasrava 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I'll always take the bigger motor if I can. The less boost I can run and still make the power I want, the happier I (and my conrods) will be.

  • @Thegoose95
    @Thegoose95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I’ve beaten the shit out of my sloppy mechanics don’t Bs me 4.8 build for over 2 years now and at least 100 full pulls on 10-16 pounds. Love the 4.8😂

    • @crisitanc5666
      @crisitanc5666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How hard is it to build? Im thinking building a 5.3 im 19 not much experience should i not even try it what should i study?

    • @Thegoose95
      @Thegoose95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@crisitanc5666 not hard at all with tons of 5.3 rebuild videos out there. Don’t mess with replacing main bearings and rod bearings. Use stock rods/pistons from a gen 4 engine preferably. Try to install new cam bearings at the very least with a new cam retention plate and oil pump pickup O-ring as these are the number 1 premature failure points on stock bottom end 5.3s. Throw some Chinese head studs with LS9 headgaskets and .26 and .28 thousandths ring gap on the top and bottom piston rings if you’re gonna be pushing more than 16 pounds regularly. Bottom line, keep it simple and cost effective.

    • @timweb1510
      @timweb1510 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Thegoose95 I have a stock lm7 on a stand, other than a sloppy stage 2 setup, what would you replace or upgrade? The small odds n ends add up

    • @Thegoose95
      @Thegoose95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@timweb1510 Gap your stock rings, replace the oil pump pickup tube o-ring, and replace the cam retainer plate at a minimum.Valve springs are a must, so get some PAC 1218 springs. You can rock the stock pushrods if you want. Some cheap speedmaster head studs if you're gonna be pushing more than 15 pounds all the time. And some snake eater performance 100 or 150 lb injectors with either a single walbro 450 for less than 700 hp, or twin 450s for more.

    • @TheLanGscaper
      @TheLanGscaper ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@timweb1510yÿÿÿÿþ

  • @theozman38
    @theozman38 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Richard. Ok. I’m standing very corrected and that feeling that my brain 🧠 was misfiring badly. You kinda argued that a 5.3 cannot get to 500hp without modifying the heads. I mentioned it too with someone else who said it was possible. So far you haven’t showed us that it’s possible with stock heads and stock intake. I know you recorded a video with a 5.3 getting close to 450 with a cam only swap. I know I seen it. Maybe again I’m convinced my memory is correct. Keep revving up those numbers. Lol great info Richard .

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have never made 500 hp on a stock 5.3l short block with stock heads (maybe with 799 heads, a big cam and flat top pistons and short runner or carb intake

  • @jamesgeorge6551
    @jamesgeorge6551 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm using a LH6 5.3, because I got it free. But I have a LLV 2900 Vortec 4 cyl too, the littlest brother of the LL8 Vortec 4200.

  • @smokinboostedduece1170
    @smokinboostedduece1170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    loved the vid.I have both engines and watching your vids for alot of info.Appreciate all the info it helps us new people to ls stuff alot

  • @cmac0695
    @cmac0695 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Taking the 4.8 all day. No replacement for displacement except forced induction!

  • @hugieflhr03
    @hugieflhr03 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need to do more Big Bang engines! That is just insane 1200hp out of a stock bottom end 4.8L

  • @attitudeadjusted9027
    @attitudeadjusted9027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Really wish you'd do some LS stuff.

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Seriously..... I really need some LS info....

    • @muttenmagroo
      @muttenmagroo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd like to see how high you can actually rev an LS before something goes wrong. Either all stock or with a lightened valvetrain. Maybe titanium pushrods rockers retainers with dual springs.

    • @jheibeck6059
      @jheibeck6059 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      🙈

    • @scrapman6261
      @scrapman6261 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lmao this is ls

    • @scrapman6261
      @scrapman6261 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a lr4 she reves to 5800 this week ass al60e doesn't handle it bands are going already shea not stock but a tune and pimple Bolton get you over 300 I don't care what anyone says especially with a tune

  • @orangetruckman
    @orangetruckman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Come on folks...if we want Richard to keep making awesome videos, we need to subscribe!! Plus, I’m sure he’ll do an awesome give away at 250,000 subs 😬🙏🏻 I have no association with Richard or this channel other than enjoying the content and being super appreciative of all the data and hard work this man has brought to all of US!!! The least we can do is give his channel the love it deserves 💁🏼‍♂️
    With that said, I’m starting to lean toward a 5.3 over the 4.8, that I’m planning to build. I’d rather have lower rpms with high grunt numbers. Thank you for all that you do sir!

  • @troylambert5140
    @troylambert5140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All Chevy LS with boost are amazing engines between these two 5.3 all day especially with my heavy f body

  • @6xcchamber971
    @6xcchamber971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you! Just pulled the engine apart cleaned it, honed and painted today!!
    Have you seen any difference if any between a aluminum block compared to Cast iron block for boosted applications? Longevity or strength?
    Thanks again for your reply.
    Bradley

  • @wallyhare8616
    @wallyhare8616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    4.8 and reason being. Less piston rock in the bore which makes it more “ reliable” all else being the same

    • @aydengalloway1929
      @aydengalloway1929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Both 4.8 and 5.3 have same bore, but different stroke is what makes the liter size higher

    • @wallyhare8616
      @wallyhare8616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Correct. And with the shorter stroke put less leverage on the piston as it is forced down the bore and causing less piston rock.

    • @aydengalloway1929
      @aydengalloway1929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wallyhare8616 I understand what you’re saying now. Makes sense. Also less rotating assembly weight for high revs to keep the torque low👌🏽

    • @wallyhare8616
      @wallyhare8616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You can take the block and punch it out to 99 mm. Use the 5.3 crank and you have yourself a “350”. Really more like a 346ish but that is a poor mans ls1 lol

    • @wallyhare8616
      @wallyhare8616 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@aydengalloway1929 i wouldnt go that far. Both 4.8, 5.3, 6.0, 6.2 or whatever have you can spin 10k. Nothing to do with stroke. Balanced correctly the limiting factor is the valve springs and camshaft.

  • @carportshenanigans5918
    @carportshenanigans5918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I hate LS swaps, simply because EVERYBODY does them. That being said, they’re great engines and I’ve almost convinced a very anti-LS buddy into swapping one into a 74 Firebird project. His only caveat is that it’s a 6.0...I’m pretty certain you’ve run stock 5.3 and 6.0’s with carb intakes...so I’ll go on the search! I remember a magazine article years ago that took an LQ9(pretty sure) and did a piece by piece build and the thing made 415hp with just a carb & dyno headers, then like 495hp just by adding a cam and springs to it. I can’t remember what magazine it was but it sure would be nice to find it again...my magazine “archive room” is mostly full of MM&FF and 5.0&SF. Lol

  • @TJSpike
    @TJSpike 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Id love to see Richard push an ls1 or all aluminum 5.3 with a turbo just to see how much it can take, but they are rare compared to other blocks

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      the l33 5.3l can take all of it

    • @19jody72
      @19jody72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 lmao🤣🤣

    • @shanelefever7704
      @shanelefever7704 ปีที่แล้ว

      Rather take the iron block less money and won't warp if you over heat the motor

  • @yinzer_412_
    @yinzer_412_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jack Roberts chose the 4.8l and goes high 7's in the quarter with 35 lbs. of boost. All stock bottom end and factory ring gap. He never took the rotating assembly apart.
    He's on TH-cam. Squirrel Tuned is the channel.

    • @snakeballs8965
      @snakeballs8965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Richard has talked about how you can grab a junkyard motor with higher miles and it'll come pre ring gapped from the wear. 😅 That's exactly what jack said when he was talking about why he chose the 4.8.
      And I mean, you can make 1000 hp out of a 1.8 liter if you want, it's all a matter of how much you want to spend, and what you want your starting point to be.

  • @travisabrahamson5092
    @travisabrahamson5092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the 4.8 but whatever is at the junkyard or online in your town works great .
    All the parts change over so just use what you can and go bigger if you want .
    I make over a thousand on any ls with a t6 Borg. But on the street its turned down to 7psi . Still making over 650 whp on that .

  • @KH-jq8im
    @KH-jq8im 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are the ultimate engine channel lol.

  • @DonkeyGap750K3Gixxer
    @DonkeyGap750K3Gixxer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty much a no brainer to chose the 5.3l over 4.8l due to the larger displacement-more power period if both are built identical

  • @lexustech48
    @lexustech48 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plucked my 4.8 off offer up as a stripped long block with God knows how many miles and what kind of bearing conditions.
    But its destiny is that of a huge nitrous shot first, then add an ebay turbo kit.
    Project Shitbox is underway!

  • @joedanero5360
    @joedanero5360 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Moral of the story. A 4.8 will still make a butt puckering street machine and you'll be left with figuring out the trans and rear end just the same.
    I think that if one thought they were getting a 5.3 for a classic car street rod weekend warrior LS swap and ended up with a 4.8 they would still be pretty stinking happy with it's performance. And if they blow it up then most of the parts and investment will translate well to a 5.3 or a 6.0.

  • @JonathanCalkins
    @JonathanCalkins 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The rave music is always good

  • @danielnolasco119
    @danielnolasco119 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Was wondering when we are gonna see more of the Gen V LT stuff?😁

    • @joshdrobny93
      @joshdrobny93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      When someone sends him the Holley that runs it

    • @michaelallen2501
      @michaelallen2501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What's there to see? They all make power. And cost an arm and a leg used from the junkyard still lol.

    • @joshdrobny93
      @joshdrobny93 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@michaelallen2501 could say what's there to see here, but yet we're all watching it anyways. The LTs are actually cheaper than a lot of other engines...

    • @michaelallen2501
      @michaelallen2501 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joshdrobny93 a 4.8 and a 5.3 cost $600 at a junkyard with full accessories and a PCM. What's a Gen 5 go for? $2500 and up? Apples to oranges dude. Not even close.

    • @stlchevy95
      @stlchevy95 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelallen2501 $225+$50 core here in missouri🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @19jody72
    @19jody72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How much boost you running..
    Richard: "ALL OF IT"

  • @akaitv6606
    @akaitv6606 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The best combo period is a 6.0 block with a 4.8 crank long rods . Absolutely tyre smoken fun . A little bit like the old small journal 327 .

  • @benklingelhefer6851
    @benklingelhefer6851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd like to see the curves throughout the rpm range. It's more valuable to see 1.2k to 4k than just the peaks where we will rarely live.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      1200 RPM AT WOT?

    • @benklingelhefer6851
      @benklingelhefer6851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That is not valuable either.
      I mean collecting the numbers of the low end on the ramp up.

    • @benklingelhefer6851
      @benklingelhefer6851 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have never ran a dyno, so what I am asking for may be a setup limitation.

    • @nocturnalspecialties642
      @nocturnalspecialties642 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@benklingelhefer6851 I always start chasis dyno pulls low on certain builds. Say a stock 6.0 with a turbo for towing. Ill start the pulls around 1500 rpms and can get the most out of dyno time.
      Majority of the time I figure out what rpm it will be at while doing 70mph and make sure that portion of the tune is good since towing that'd gonna be where it spends the most of its time...

  • @THE_ORIGINAL_I-SEARCHdotFUN
    @THE_ORIGINAL_I-SEARCHdotFUN 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh Heck; Rich got dance moves? Wow? Not bad either. Double R; (Rocking Richard) n the house.

  • @bluecollarfox916
    @bluecollarfox916 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It’s funny when ppl say that the 4.8 likes to rev. Take the same heads and cam on a 5.3 and 4.8, the 4.8 doesn’t LIKE to rev, it HAS to rev to make the power. It’s almost as if it has a bigger cam in it. Put a small cam in a 5.3 and 6.2 and you’ll have the same comparison. Am I right Richard?

  • @zx10danny1
    @zx10danny1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would choose a 6.0. If more displacement is better then go with the 6.0.

  • @williejohnson9645
    @williejohnson9645 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to see you run a Cadillac supercharger with dual turbo`S WITH A STAGE 2 CAM

  • @TreWilliams-bb-inc
    @TreWilliams-bb-inc 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Okay let’s say I want a 4.8 build with a 10 speed automatic twin turbo what’s the best reliable transmission to go with?

  • @Micko350
    @Micko350 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Too bad we don't see either of those over here in Australia so finding a dirt cheap LS is like finding Rocking Horse Poo! To my knowledge we only got the 5.7 6.0 & 6.2 litre LS varints. As they say bigger is better! 🤔

  • @scottbeckman4887
    @scottbeckman4887 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey Richard nice job, how about the Buick?

  • @hoost3056
    @hoost3056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about an LT converted to port injection? Some folks don't like the direct injection and the kit to convert it is not expensive.

  • @HahlinEngineering
    @HahlinEngineering 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Richard! Great videos you are making!
    Are you rymning 1100hp on a stock gen3 LM7 bottom end with just ring gap for turbo?
    I am a Swedish Guy building a timeattack Volvo 142 -72 with a Corvette C5 drivetrain and a LM7 at first. Aiming for 1000hp at the wheels.
    Do you think i should go stock bottom end or do forged Pistons and conrods for durability?
    Thanks a bunch! 👍

  • @vinceconstanzo6657
    @vinceconstanzo6657 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the idea of a turbocharged 4.8 but my bigger is better side always wins. Time to boost my ls1.

  • @MrSprintcat
    @MrSprintcat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How about doing a plug-and-play? To have somebody around my location tune a twin turbo on a LS motor your talking big bucks.and a long wait time . how much power can you get with off the shelf parts? I like the 5.3. Because I have one .😅😅 thanks for the video Richard.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      off the shelf parts?

    • @MrSprintcat
      @MrSprintcat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most power with add on parts with a power programmer? With out going to the dyno.idk.🤔

  • @bobmoore4790
    @bobmoore4790 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How about a old school 305 vs.350 SBc....twin shoot out or a big bang 350 ,?

  • @garethgriswold3470
    @garethgriswold3470 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just bought a 5.3 LM7 I believe it’s out of a 2000 Yukon I believe with 862 heads. I am going to put it in my 4 door 65 nova that has church boys racing suspension I want to drive the family around but still hit up the drag strip and a road course along with some auto crosses, I would like around 750-850 hp at the wheels I know that’s a bit much for auto cross and road racing but I still want it lol what would you recommend as far as a budget engine build it will be ran with Holley Terminator X.

  • @christianulsund2951
    @christianulsund2951 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your concept. But why can't we see the dyno runs?

  • @ZEPRATGERNODT
    @ZEPRATGERNODT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I need low end torque and a motor I don’t have to rev out to get going. Especially on a four speed automatic...5.3/5.7.

  • @jsflagstad
    @jsflagstad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No mention on the injectors you're using in these "junkyard motors"?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      INJECTORS NEED TO MATCH THE POWER LEVEL-120 POUNDERS AT LEAST

  • @jonroberts6518
    @jonroberts6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Honestly 4.8, cause now wondering if it will fit in a Pontiac Fiero?🤔

  • @maxfieldenterprise3160
    @maxfieldenterprise3160 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm building my first street car ..with a 2004 mustang and I was wondering what would be the better build for power ..the 4.8 or the 5.3 really not a turbo guy just running on motor muscle 💪

  • @TheProchargedmopar
    @TheProchargedmopar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5.3 is 0.1 liter bigger than a 318.
    I rest my case.
    #440 😝
    Now where's that $ button in this chat for the 5.9 Magnum testing?!?
    😂

  • @joelgross4597
    @joelgross4597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What was the timing advance at max boost 19lbs for the 5.3?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      19-20 degrees on race gas

    • @infamousnova
      @infamousnova 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 Are you pulling timing at diff kpa/psi or are you running the timing set all the way?

    • @littleherms3285
      @littleherms3285 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@infamousnova generally, you want to pull a degree or two at peak torque with a blend in/out about 400rpm either side. Then, at about 800rpm above peak torque feed in another 1 to 2 degrees to carry the torque out farther.
      On e65 I feed in another 4 deg above torque peak on a 4.8. So 14* at 3000, pull 2* at peak torque (4700rpm) and finish at 18* at 6600rpm. This is on 20lbs of boost with twin GT35s...in a 4000lb street car. Made a hair over 780whp.

    • @infamousnova
      @infamousnova 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@littleherms3285 ok thanks, now I just have to find peak tq lol

  • @jrsgarage3244
    @jrsgarage3244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question Rocky, in the light car with gear acelaration reving speed of 4.8, higher rpm shift point would give better ET, also easier to hook up ??🏁🚩

    • @adeadlyfart13
      @adeadlyfart13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This question is highly confusing, you sure you know what you are asking?

  • @6xcchamber971
    @6xcchamber971 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Richard! I have read that a 4.8/5.3 block is identical and it is only the crank and rods pistons that make the difference! I found a good block that has 4.8 internals in it. I should then be able to put my 5.3 internals into it and have a 5.3 is this Correct?
    This is what I read online. I am new to all this.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Bradley

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes-the 5.3L components will both right into the 4.8l block

  • @joobreezy6016
    @joobreezy6016 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a 94 hardbody and looking for a swap. I didn't want a V8 but it looks like they're cheaper to build... What do you think 4.8 or 5.3? I think bcs of the weight I should go with 4.8 due to torque but I'm not expert so I hope to get a experts help

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the 4.8 and 5.3l weight the same

    • @joobreezy6016
      @joobreezy6016 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 but do you think having a 5.3 In a small 94 hardbody will make it spin too much with the torque being at lower rpms...? Since the 4.8 the peak horse power and torque is up much higher in the revs

  • @russelljackson7034
    @russelljackson7034 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Right on

  • @billwhitfield7437
    @billwhitfield7437 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tbh.. I'd use either.. depends on what i have

  • @michaelnorris5348
    @michaelnorris5348 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the 4.8 spins up in rpm quicker but u loose out on low end torque its really hard to saywhats best except top end the5.3 will win out

  • @JosephNnbs
    @JosephNnbs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wanna run a stroker engine in my truck, should I just take my gen4 5.3 to get bored and worked over with the stroker kit or do I have to run a 6.0 block? Looking for over 400 cubes

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if you want over 400-then a 6.0 block

    • @JosephNnbs
      @JosephNnbs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 thank appreciate It buddy. Now to find an affordable gen4 block

  • @michaelgarner6789
    @michaelgarner6789 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Are these junkyard engines tested with the stock injectors also?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  ปีที่แล้ว

      stock injectors won't support these power levels-they require much more fuel

  • @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915
    @joeyjojojr.shabadoo915 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Richard, this one might take a second or 2 to spit out.....so here goes nothing (sorry if your brain hurts already, just seeing a question from me again).
    In regards to Gen3 LS. Since the L33 5.3L uses the same piston as the 4.8L LR4, but the same Rod length and stroke as an LM4 5.3L Gen3, would it fair to assume that since the LS1 uses the same Rods/Crankshaft as all 5.3L Gen3 motors, that the LS1 Pistons and 4.8L pistons are the same Pin Height ? Would throwing a set of LS1 Pistons on 4.8L Rods and prepping the block to accept them, be an easy way to get a bit more out of a 4.8L by adding what is essentially 20 cubic inches overall ? (293 to roughly 313 with aftermarket 3.905 Pistons). If you have a 2005-2007 4.8L LR4 with the Gen4 Rod and floating pin update, would this upgrade make sense if you needed to get pistons and do block prep anyways ? Also, in those Gen4 rods, would upgraded ARP fasteners make any sense ? or are the OEM designed fasteners the best for those cracked forged rods ?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      THIS IS DONE A LOT-THE PIN HEIGHT IS THE SAME, YOU CAN UPGRADE TO GEN 4 ROTATING ASSEMBLY-ARP ROD BOLTS NOT NEEDED

  • @timweb1510
    @timweb1510 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great upload

  • @jaydubb71
    @jaydubb71 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My boost combos will start with a 6.0 of course.

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bingo

  • @clintlawson2455
    @clintlawson2455 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish i had your talent im fixin to build a 5.3 as a factory mud bog 2003 tahoe i need s cam help a brother out ill pay shipping

  • @jordanceranowicz6670
    @jordanceranowicz6670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    parts list for the 4.8l please? I can't find anything.

  • @sigmaforge5088
    @sigmaforge5088 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if you ran the exhaust straight into the intake, properly sized of course, you would have a zero loss system once the rpms achieved balanced rosonance.

  • @jaggerbahrik8589
    @jaggerbahrik8589 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    whens the how to get max power from a 5.3 coming out??

  • @airboatjunk
    @airboatjunk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whats the specs on these turbos?

  • @SubePelayo928
    @SubePelayo928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got a question, I’m building an LS 4runner. To mainly run in the dunes. So it’ll see a lot of RPMs, and load from paddle tires. I’m only shooting for around 450-500hp on pump gas. I can add higher octane or even run 100-110 VP. Should I tear the 5.3 apart to gap the rings. Or run it as is? Motor is a gen 3 LM7. Stock everything, 706 heads with a small turbo.

  • @19jody72
    @19jody72 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Be interested to see how much power all acc's cost..basically in full street trim that 80% run

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the ACCs video is up

    • @19jody72
      @19jody72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 thank ya sir!!

    • @19jody72
      @19jody72 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 Hmmm.. don't see.it Richard

  • @ZaphodBeeblebrox042
    @ZaphodBeeblebrox042 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What music do you use?

  • @johnwehunt4305
    @johnwehunt4305 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5.3L Richard. Of course Gen IV rods. Displacement rules. Maybe babying will give better gas mileage to the 4.8L.

  • @vortecturbo
    @vortecturbo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But those are two totally different engine combinations you can't even compare apples to apples is more like Apple's vs. Oranges. If we're going to do an engine comparison use the same head use the same camshaft of course you use the same truck intake manifold which is great but they're not the same.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      they are the same if you understand ls motors-the displacement is the biggest variable

  • @_clapped740i6
    @_clapped740i6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a 4.8 and I wanna get a 5.3 and boost it but I’m not sure if I wanna just boost my 4.8 or get a 5.3 😂 probably 4.8 bc I beat the everliving piss out of my motor and it runs basically as smooth as a brand new motor

  • @864offroadllc3
    @864offroadllc3 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's your thoughts on stock ring gap on a 180k+ bottom end?

  • @Foxfatherracing
    @Foxfatherracing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about junkyart turbos?
    Or diesel ones

  • @petehoefs2619
    @petehoefs2619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    About how much power can you expect to get on stock injectors

  • @timtaylor6147
    @timtaylor6147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rich
    There's always a small dip in the curve at the start
    Is that the Dyno load in ?
    On the road power doesn't behave that way

  • @baxydalia
    @baxydalia 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there a dimension diff between 4.8 and 5.3?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      same external size (different stroke and rod length)

    • @antipasinchrist
      @antipasinchrist 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is the LS7 the same external dimensions too (to 4.8, 5.3, 6.0, and 6.2)?

    • @baxydalia
      @baxydalia 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@richardholdener1727 thank you sir

  • @miquelanesto1762
    @miquelanesto1762 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is the cost of the modified LS?

  • @ga-america5030
    @ga-america5030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can't wait til you get your hands on the v6s from nissan and hyundai some day

    • @OGbqze
      @OGbqze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would be awesome!

  • @apprenticefelix7740
    @apprenticefelix7740 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    13b big bang

  • @jeffthejinjer
    @jeffthejinjer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'll take the high revving 4.8L please!

  • @unclesquirrel6951
    @unclesquirrel6951 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Personally I blame squirrels

  • @daytradescottie7253
    @daytradescottie7253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Biggerer is more betterer

  • @paulmazzara5030
    @paulmazzara5030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    More ford stuff.