What if I use those same rules as you did but not in the same order, like applying the rule in other steps meaning in the first step that you did l will do it as the 3rd step with the same rule , while in the first step l will use the second rule that you wrote with the same answer? l don't know if it make sense😢, But still get the same answer will that also be CORRECT!!?
Hi, how would you go about doing this question: Prove (p V q) ^ (- p ^ - q) = false by writing a transformational proof. Every step of your proof must be fully annotated. Each step must apply just one law of logic.
Proving Absorption Law with other laws was a bit tricky for me, Thanks for clearing it out.
Any time!
What if I use those same rules as you did but not in the same order, like applying the rule in other steps meaning in the first step that you did l will do it as the 3rd step with the same rule , while in the first step l will use the second rule that you wrote with the same answer? l don't know if it make sense😢, But still get the same answer will that also be CORRECT!!?
Hi, how would you go about doing this question:
Prove (p V q) ^ (- p ^ - q) = false by writing a transformational proof. Every step of your proof must be fully annotated. Each step must apply just one law of logic.
With the - signs being the negation symbol 😅
Thank you 🙏.
You're welcome!
putol naman po explaination sa dulo ayos na sana...