Copywriting Conference 2013: Dave Trott · Predatory thinking for copywriters

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @Anonymous-or4ru
    @Anonymous-or4ru 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I went to GGT on Dean Street London many years ago. He was the 'T' of GGT. He had a fearsome reputation. The agency always strove to be different. I learned a lot there. In a meeting with Gordon Smith at Walsh Trott Chick Smith a few years later, Dave popped his head in. I expected a frightful glare and a booming voice. He smiled and apologised in a squeaky voice. Funny how perceptions change. One of few ad men who can still engage and teach an audience through brilliant simplicity. Great preso, Trotty

  • @adminomhfoz1908
    @adminomhfoz1908 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    brilliant

  • @mohdmohtashim9841
    @mohdmohtashim9841 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ohh i came across this talk for the first time in 2017 and again now in 2020 but man those jokes still crack me up.

  • @AdamCoutts
    @AdamCoutts 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Pure, simple brilliance!

  • @itzajdmting
    @itzajdmting 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Brilliant presentation. Thank you.

  • @richarddacker3683
    @richarddacker3683 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant explanation of creativity and predatory thinking by Dave.Troll. Great Value

    • @desprow
      @desprow 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Richard Dacker Dave Troll LoL

  • @anaisguillemane
    @anaisguillemane 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Looking for the source of study explaining that 89% of ads are going unnoticed. Does anyone know it?

    • @kirkcheyfitz9290
      @kirkcheyfitz9290 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Anaïs, I've been looking, too. There appears to be no source whatsoever except for Dave Trott, who never names a source. The number may have some support in a legitimate 2014 study of Super Bowl ads by Bloomberg that found only 10% were recalled by viewers. (The original Bloomberg article is hard to find, but the study was definitely covered by Bloomberg this third-party report appears legit: www.newmediaandmarketing.com/less-10-super-bowl-spots-recalled/) Did you ever find any reference to Trott's source?

    • @tekootianderson
      @tekootianderson 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He's a copywriter (a glorified salesperson) not an academic. They can make outrageous claims. Lol

    • @lokoomontana4818
      @lokoomontana4818 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You weren't listing when he asked them "Who remembers an ad from yesterday?" - I think you just getting defensive because he stated some hurtful facts. This guy is a marketing genius.

    • @lokoomontana4818
      @lokoomontana4818 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Makes more cash than they do tho?

    • @thepaulmacfarlane
      @thepaulmacfarlane 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check your own head. Check all that you scrolled past today and all you saw and hear every day. What percentage had impact for you?

  • @abhishekb-om
    @abhishekb-om 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whats the presentation tool used to show the paper on the board?

    • @LeifKendall1
      @LeifKendall1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think its an overhead projector - very old school!

  • @roshanhaider335
    @roshanhaider335 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    good

  • @Rachaelshaw7
    @Rachaelshaw7 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Each of the women, one by one, will be joining in..."
    Mate, you need to observe your TA more closely

  • @reverendbluejeans1748
    @reverendbluejeans1748 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    21:40 Blood, ur having a fucking Turkish.

  • @chillydoog
    @chillydoog ปีที่แล้ว

    ChatGPT turned AD copy into a horse and buggy.

  • @marigordon4980
    @marigordon4980 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, ‘third world’, this has dated.