Great video, very interesting spots. I think you played them correctly by nash, but it's equally importand to also always look at the stats of your opponent (wich you do). It's so great to get an insight on this complex thinking of the worlds greatest online poker tournament player. And its completely free on youtube, unbelievable that you don't have millions of views. But i guess that there aren't millions of people who are willing to get so deep into poker theory xD I just started poker and got my bankroll from 100$ to 220$ with mtts, but i don't know if it is worth it for me to use the programm that you use in this video, or if it might be better to first invest in a HUD and get to learn the perfect stats and how to find opponents weaknesses.
@@wahrscheinlichoder3017 Definitely go for a HUD instead of PioSolver if you decide to purchase any software. This shit is way too advanced for beginners.
@WAHRSCHEINLICH ODER HUD ,you dont need this at all ,ever. You must buy HUD ,its incredible value ,and this chanal is also is not that good ( in my opinion) many of there videos have bad advices.. the way how you study is take a pen and notebook and write hands that you find interesting ,than use HUD and think about what mistakes you made and what is better play.
@@enisdesevic8277 bad advice? This info is next level but you have to had some knowledge of poker theory ( GTO) and how its applicable at the games. Don't try this in your games for sure if you don't know what to do (doesn't work in your low stakes)
Just another absolute GOLD! You just showing that anybody can improve his game just watching your videos! Fcuking best! Hope oneday u get so much feedback as u giving it to people! Thank you very much!
Ben you're a monster, we can see you are very sharp in a lot of different spots even the more complex spots that most people have difficult to understand which is really inspiring for me, and it shows me that I have a lot to improve, gold content for free,ty so much! and soon will go get your paid content
This video is so advanced and informative. I honestly can’t belief you just give this information away when it’s 1000s of dollars worth of coaching material. Thanks man!
Thanks so much for the great video. Although you know all the best, I have some suggestions for future PIO videos, such as: turning Runouts EV comparison to see the action frequencies of each future cards or analyze ranges interaction by checking "Range Explorer" to explain better the frequencies and purposes. I think by doing so, we can learn more from one sim. Keep up the good work :)
recommendation: say SB or BB instead of villain, hero... I found myself confused bc you were calling SB villain at times. Also, Pio wants us to check and donk FDs on the turn. Can we really check/call with T/J/8/7 high flush draws on a paired board with limited opportunity to take the pot down on future streets OOP?
Thanks for all your contribution for the community Ben! Always stoked to learn from a great mind like yours. I have a question regarding the first A92dd board - why do we favour betting offsuit hand combos (e.g. KQo, QTo etc) with a diamond, especially on a board where we don't expect to face many C/R (to deny our BD equity). Wouldn't it be logically better to bet those with a diamond and/or spade because it blocks more of their continuing range? Thank you in advance :)
In first hand why we are going all in I don't see villan calling with a high . I think we should go with a pot size bet so he can call and pay? Let me know why not ??
would love to know how our range works after the 80%-100% check vs a bet .. what would you do with 66 ? call, fold or raise ? thanks for the content as always !
Hey Ben, my question might be a bit unclear in my last post. On the A92dd flop, I understand that c-betting the low-equity hands towards the bottom of our range is a mistake. However, when looking at PIO which picks the lower equity hand combos to bet, it favours betting offsuit hand combos (e.g. KQo, QTo) WITHOUT a diamond (as opposed to hands with a diamond that has higher equity). Wouldn't it be better to bet those with a diamond (has higher equity and bluff potential; and blocks more of their continuing range), especially when we're only facing such a small % of C/R OTF and realistically lower number in game? Thank you in advance and keep up the good work :3
These blind on blind videos are sick/epic (not sure what your favorite word is, I go for sick because you use that word more frequently). I clearly have to catch up in these positions. Anyway the first hand. When BB reaches only 20% of hands he raises with vs a SB limp. Instead of the 45%. We can fold the bottom of our limp/calling range. But what about line between value raising and limp/calling? Which hands you would normally x/R for value, you limp/call now? Or don't you have any limp/value raises because if BB only raises 20% you just take the linear approach? (because he doesn't do the raising work for you) And what about bluffing? As an exploit we bluff literally 0%?
Like the analysis,but I loose you , in the length of the video/ analysis. Maybe work on shortening analysis & sticking to main points to improve content. Thx # Rec.player
Playing out of Position is tricky, that´s why we decided to analyze to hands OOP as detailed as possible! Lets us know what you think in the comments!
Great video, very interesting spots. I think you played them correctly by nash, but it's equally importand to also always look at the stats of your opponent (wich you do). It's so great to get an insight on this complex thinking of the worlds greatest online poker tournament player. And its completely free on youtube, unbelievable that you don't have millions of views. But i guess that there aren't millions of people who are willing to get so deep into poker theory xD I just started poker and got my bankroll from 100$ to 220$ with mtts, but i don't know if it is worth it for me to use the programm that you use in this video, or if it might be better to first invest in a HUD and get to learn the perfect stats and how to find opponents weaknesses.
@@wahrscheinlichoder3017 Definitely go for a HUD instead of PioSolver if you decide to purchase any software. This shit is way too advanced for beginners.
@WAHRSCHEINLICH ODER HUD ,you dont need this at all ,ever. You must buy HUD ,its incredible value ,and this chanal is also is not that good ( in my opinion) many of there videos have bad advices.. the way how you study is take a pen and notebook and write hands that you find interesting ,than use HUD and think about what mistakes you made and what is better play.
@@enisdesevic8277 bad advice? This info is next level but you have to had some knowledge of poker theory ( GTO) and how its applicable at the games.
Don't try this in your games for sure if you don't know what to do (doesn't work in your low stakes)
@@gastonangelini8352 xD okay sir :)))) vincelis
on stars ,google me :)
You are a big part of the reason that I was able to buy a car yesterday with my poker winnings. Thank you for the positive impact on my life!
that's amazing would love to share your story on our social media accounts if you would be up for it message us on Instagram!
Ben, you always go exactly where it hurts! This is how success works. "Do what you are afraid of and the death of fear is certain." ☺♥
thanks man!
Just another absolute GOLD! You just showing that anybody can improve his game just watching your videos! Fcuking best! Hope oneday u get so much feedback as u giving it to people! Thank you very much!
thanks for the sick feedback buddy! lets keep crushing buddy im hyped up!!!
Ben you're a monster, we can see you are very sharp in a lot of different spots even the more complex spots that most people have difficult to understand which is really inspiring for me, and it shows me that I have a lot to improve, gold content for free,ty so much! and soon will go get your paid content
thanks so much for the great feedback keep it up buddy and see you on the tables
Your analysis is head and shoulders above anyone else I have listened to.
love those vids with advance stuff which people dont even understand well but still aplaying those concepts into their games
This video is so advanced and informative. I honestly can’t belief you just give this information away when it’s 1000s of dollars worth of coaching material. Thanks man!
thats what we do buddy ;)
Thanks so much for the great video. Although you know all the best, I have some suggestions for future PIO videos, such as: turning Runouts EV comparison to see the action frequencies of each future cards or analyze ranges interaction by checking "Range Explorer" to explain better the frequencies and purposes. I think by doing so, we can learn more from one sim. Keep up the good work :)
Thank you so much for all you provide myself and your community. Much appreciated, oh' Great One :)
Glad you enjoy it!
Thanks for the video, the content here is awesome!
Very happy that you like it!
Great video Ben! Thank you for sharing with us!
of course glad you like it
legend
recommendation: say SB or BB instead of villain, hero... I found myself confused bc you were calling SB villain at times.
Also, Pio wants us to check and donk FDs on the turn. Can we really check/call with T/J/8/7 high flush draws on a paired board with limited opportunity to take the pot down on future streets OOP?
Thanks for the great content!!
You welcome chief
Thanks for all your contribution for the community Ben! Always stoked to learn from a great mind like yours. I have a question regarding the first A92dd board - why do we favour betting offsuit hand combos (e.g. KQo, QTo etc) with a diamond, especially on a board where we don't expect to face many C/R (to deny our BD equity). Wouldn't it be logically better to bet those with a diamond and/or spade because it blocks more of their continuing range? Thank you in advance :)
In first hand why we are going all in I don't see villan calling with a high . I think we should go with a pot size bet so he can call and pay? Let me know why not ??
would love to know how our range works after the 80%-100% check vs a bet .. what would you do with 66 ? call, fold or raise ? thanks for the content as always !
great as always
Thx buddy
Thanks for the share mate!
only for the community!!!
Hey Ben, my question might be a bit unclear in my last post. On the A92dd flop, I understand that c-betting the low-equity hands towards the bottom of our range is a mistake. However, when looking at PIO which picks the lower equity hand combos to bet, it favours betting offsuit hand combos (e.g. KQo, QTo) WITHOUT a diamond (as opposed to hands with a diamond that has higher equity). Wouldn't it be better to bet those with a diamond (has higher equity and bluff potential; and blocks more of their continuing range), especially when we're only facing such a small % of C/R OTF and realistically lower number in game? Thank you in advance and keep up the good work :3
These blind on blind videos are sick/epic (not sure what your favorite word is, I go for sick because you use that word more frequently). I clearly have to catch up in these positions.
Anyway the first hand. When BB reaches only 20% of hands he raises with vs a SB limp. Instead of the 45%. We can fold the bottom of our limp/calling range. But what about line between value raising and limp/calling? Which hands you would normally x/R for value, you limp/call now? Or don't you have any limp/value raises because if BB only raises 20% you just take the linear approach? (because he doesn't do the raising work for you) And what about bluffing? As an exploit we bluff literally 0%?
Like the analysis,but I loose you , in the length of the video/ analysis. Maybe work on shortening analysis & sticking to main points to improve content. Thx # Rec.player