All You Need is Blood? Rabbi Tovia Singer Refutes the Church’s Core Doctrine of Sin and Atonement!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Christians are surprised to discover their church’s cornerstone creed, “without the shedding of blood there is no atonement,” which famously appears in Hebrews 9:22, is not found anywhere in the Jewish Scriptures. Although the footnote for Hebrews 9:22 in every annotated Christian Bible references Leviticus 17:11 as the source and authority for this doctrine, this idea is unbiblical and denounced by the Jewish prophets.
In this lively broadcast, Rabbi Singer points to the Bible and demonstrates that there is no Christian voice in the Jewish Scriptures. Singer illustrates this point by probing the Guilt Offering and shows that the Christian doctrine of substitutionary atonement-the notion that only unblemished sacrificial blood can propitiate God’s wrath and atone for sin-has no greater foes than the prophets of Israel.
outreachjudais... www.toviasinger...
Rabbi Tovia, the trinity slayer back at it. Love it.
The TRUTH is what we need not the man made trinity
Hello brother Rabbi Tovia Singer. First of all I would like to thank you for all your videos on different subjects on Jewish scriptures. I was in search of truth, and atlast God gave me , through your videos, anyway I am now not confused and now I know why The Jewish people rejected Jesus. Yes it is true that this invented Jesus did not fulfill any prophesies. THANK VERY MUCH, AND TRYING MY BEST TO UNDERSTAND AND SPREAD THE TRUTH THAT HAS BEEN HIDDEN SINCE 2000 YRS. MAY GOD OF ABRAHAM, ISSAC AND JACOB BLESS AND GIVE ALL OF US THE STRENGTH TO SPREAD THE TRUTH AND SAVE PEOPLE FROM GETTING DECEIVED. AMEN.
Amen! I am going through the exact same thing! And Rabbi tovia singer's videos have helped me
Gentiles are obligated to keep the 7 Noahide commandments. Good luck.
I don't think it's Jesus's teachings that we should reject but the churches manipulation of his life and message of love and forgiveness
Excellent presentation and explanation Rabbi! Yasher Koach!
I agree! Shalom Salam 🌷
@Iyas kelu when the Temple stood, it was part of the atonement process. Did you listen to the program?
Love his teaching ...God Bless you Rabbi.
Thank you Rabbi.
As a Christian, I found this extremely helpful to better understand Modern Judaism.
In the end, Wil'liam Hall was great in summarizing simply, what was gently explained in detail by Rabbi Tovia.
Im Indonesian and i'm fans of Rabbi Tovia Singer
I love this channel!
I took Rabbi's advice and read Exodus 12 and I found that the "blood" of the "lamb...without blemish" was not a sacrifice for sin. It was used as some sort of signal message that the Lord would recognize and pass-over. If you got the message you'd be safe, but not expressly forgiven for sins.
Seems to me that Christians have twisted the pass-over lamb report.
@@Doriesep6622 That's a profound comment, sir. Your claim that you found it "disgusting" appears to corroborate Moses' report that the Creator was repulsed by Abel's blood sacrifice in Genesis 4:4.
Although translators seem to have changed the original Hebrew term into a positive respect, if you dig deep into the original meaning of the words, you should find that the Creator was actually horrified by Abel's blood sacrifice - just as you are now. Just as I would be too.
The reason is that you and I are both pre-programmed to recognize horror because we are designed in the Creator's image.
As such, if you wanted the Creator to pass by you - you might be well-advised to paint blood on your house.
You are right. Was an act of the righteous. Egypt had the lamb as a diety (khnum) and death penalty for killing a lamb see exodus 8 20-22
We killed and ate a lamb and smeared blood on our door posts in order to show we rank G-d above Egypt. That is the passover Lamb
@@baubljos103 we today put a mezuza with the relevant passages from the tanach inside. Every day we disrespect the ancient egyptian diety and show we rank G-d above Egypt's pagan G-d. This is the passover Lamb.
There are unintentional and intentional sins mentioned in Leviticus which require blood sacrifices for forgiveness. The Rabbi never addresses the fact that modern Jews don't offer blood sacrifices for any of these sins.
Also, the Rabbi spends a lot of time explaining the special circumstances for a person who sins but admits his sin even though he did not get caught, referring to this as a "guilt offering." He says this issue is discussed in Leviticus 5 and 6, but in fact, this issue is not mentioned at all in Leviticus 5 and 6.
I do not see anything mentioned here about the distinction between a "sin offering" and a "guilt offering." Therefore, I do not see in any way how the Rabbi can extend the reasoning from Leviticus 5 and 6 to extend to Isiah 53, in order to show that Isiah 53 is not referring to Jesus. Where exactly in Isiah 53 does it explain that this verse refers to a "guilt offering," and not a "sin offering," and therefore cannot be referring to Jesus? And where exactly does the Bible make the distinction between a "sin offering" and a "guilt offering," because that is not in Leviticus 5 and 6, as the Rabbi affirms that it is?
SEE Genesis 9:5 -6
5 “And I will require the blood of anyone who takes another person’s life. If a wild animal kills a person, it must die. And anyone who murders any man must die. 6 If anyone takes a man's life, that person’s life will also be taken by another man hands. For God < > אֱלֹהִ֑ים made man in his own image.
A question dealing with next week's Parshat, what fun!
My conversion was started almost 20 years ago and could not be completed, but we have been living Jewish all this time. There is no longer a synagogue in my area, either. My question is, why must a person go through all of this? All Ruth had to do was state the words and G-d knew her heart. What more can I do?
Hey Candace how are you? The Torah says all a person has to do is take God as their God and keep His Torah if you did that in the time of Moses you were part of Isreal. There isn't one conversion in the scriptures other than people turning to God and following torah. Do that and you'll be fine!
@@matthewbaker6093 absolutely right.matthew thanks so many don't get what is so simple
A person must go through all this stuff because of an establishment that cannot handle a huge influx of converts. In antiquity it was a lot easier to convert to Judaism, all one needed was the confession, a witness, and to learn the Commandments as you go. That's not the reality today sadly.
What about Job 1:5 where he offers burnt offerings continually in case his children sinned?
We must remember that the offerings are for the people of Israel and Jew's and not for the world well done rabbi tovia singer again for your knowledge of scripture ❤️👍
Well done 👏 ✔️ 👍
Please Rabbi, COME TO MONTREAL CANADA!
Thank you ❤
Once again, seeing things through the Hebrew vs the pagan Greek/Church translations makes a world of difference. I hope more people will study Hebrew. So, then they can shed the misconceptions and lies churchianity spins about The Elohim of Torah being some kind of blood god, like the canaanites worshipped. Thank you!
• HalleluYAH 🙌🏼🕎
Indonesia 17,000 thousand islands?!
Well comeback to Indonesia Rabbi, so sorry I didnt meet you awhile you were in Indonesia, you have teaching us much Rabbi via videos eventhough I am a muslim Islam. But once you open up about Jews since then I assumed you have open up my eyes over Jews. You are always welcome rabbi.
Wonderful
Christians follows Paul's teaching on the doctrine that the only blood sacrifice of Jesus can forgive sin and the cross uniquely reconciles man with God. This is Paul's idea not found anywhere in the Jewish Scriptures. This is called Pauline Doctrine . This resulted into what is now Pauline Christianity deviated far from the teachings of Jesus.
salim amoako. you are so wrong you need correcting. Firstly Paul was one of the most learned Jews as far as biblical Judaism ic concerned, the Judaism expounded here is not biblical ....its doctrines of men and traditions.
Secondly Paul was appointed by Jesus and the Father to take the message of Gods kingdom to the nations, he taught exactly what the Father instructed him to.
Christians, just as Paul was, are born again by the Spirit of God and so can serve the Living God and his Messiah correctly as God demands.
These presentations give a wholly inaccurate, and incorrect explanation of the new covenant. The Rabbi(Singer) excels in this.
MR. FITTA no he was not learned. Saying he was doesn’t make him so. He was so learned he banned circumcision? Stop lying idiot.
you dont know what you are on about, best sit down and drink up the deception being served up by the Rabbi.
You are completely clueless.
P,lease quote where Paul clearly states 'circumcision is banned' otherwise its you who are lying - you're lying anyway being clueless.
Study about the ebionites about Paul.
@@MRFITTA you don't know your bible apparently, clearly Paul discourages circumcision (not banned per se) but nonetheless shames the practice as unnecessary bondage of the law. He even goes to the extent to say you will become alienated from Christ! Paul definitely frowns upon gentile circumcision
Galatians 5 New International Version (NIV)
Freedom in Christ
5 It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
2 Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. 3 Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law. 4 You who are trying to be justified by the law and have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace
Rabbi, would you ever do a talk on WHY The Creator would specifically ask for animals to be used? Is it because the were something of great value back then?
For christian's a symbolic spiritual drinking blood atonement and for Jewish people physical blood sprinkling atonement. Amazing difference! 🤔
Jews recognize it's symbolic. Christians believe the blood itself has some kind of magic power or energy that God literally needs to atonement for some reason.
in the period of 40 years in the desert before the 12 tribes entered in canaan did you read anything about any sacrifice ?
The sacrifice between cain and abel...
Amos 5, Isaiah 1, Psalm 40 6, Psalm 51 16. Psalm 50 7 15.
In other words Adam missed the Mark!
Where did all the livestock come into the need for sin atonement or were those ancient sacrifices for food or what? Isn't it reflective of bronze age religious practices to appease deities?
That's exactly the question that has also been on my mind for years. There were definitely sacrifices delivered to the priests that feed them, but there were also whole burnt offerings that were burnt up completely. To my understanding, the person bringing the offering would lay their hands on the animal as it was slaughtered, identifying with it and realizing that it was a substitution, that the animal was convicted to die on behalf of his own soul. My interpretation would be that this was meant to bring about remorse and repentance in the sinner, but then it also says in several places in Exodus and Leviticus that sacrifices constitute a "pleasing aroma to the Lord", but then it also says in Psalm 40։6/7 that He does not require nor desire sacrifices... very confusing! I guess we need to study this from a Hebrew, not a Christian perspective.
The Hebrew word for sacrifices (as in the physical offerings) is קרבן which comes from the Hebrew root word to come close. The sacrifices were to enable one to come close to G-d.
There where many types
To give thanks
To repent for an unintentional sin
Daily offerings
Special holiday offerings
To phrase your question this way;
Who benefits from a sacrifice - humans or G-d?
What benefit could G-d get from animal or spices. Think of a human running a computer game - can you enjoy food im the game?
The one who benefits from a sacrifice is the human -
There is more to this topic but I thought I would just give you a brief understanding of how Judaism understands this idea
Oh and animal were of very high value in ancient times - so it makes sense it was used.
For a poor person they were able to bring flour instead of an animal.
They are giving up from their own animals - which were worth a lot of money …
David and Nathan
2 Samuel
Daniel 4
Proverbs 10
Lev 5/6
Assalamualaikum. Salam hormat saya buat Rabbi Tovia S. Saya salah satu pengagum anda dari jakarta. Semoga sehat selalu. Amin
From a Christian perspective the blood associated was the Passover lamb that was part of the first Passover when it's blood kept the angel of death out of those houses. It was also eaten when standing and I'm not sure at the moment if the last supper was eaten in the same format, unleaven bread and wine. That would have been the meal made from what Cain brought as an offering.
There is no proof that Adam made the grain offering once he was informed that God supplied the food that kept him and his family and all the other flesh he was given dominion over.
Abel was the first man to die and Cain suffered until God took the breath of life away at the age of 120 years (Ge:6) while Adam and Eve lived until they were 930 years old. If they are part of the 24 Elders (which they are) they are now about 4070 years old, when they watch Satan enter the fiery lake they are 5,000 years old as the 930 counts at some point.
This sequence is how God punishes Himself for the sin of murder as defined by the Re:21 set of Laws. The 'sons of God' are sent to the fiery lake for the sin of giving themselves in marriage to the daughters of Eve and having children (that then had to be killed by God to change the law to the 10 Commandments. That was with David, the wife of Noah's son that went to that area is how there came to be 6 fingered giants after the flood was supposed to have killed them all.
God killed the two beasts of the field before Cain killed Abel, there was also a lot more deaths from that group that was because God determined it was going to be that way. Jesus kills the last (or has them killed) during the 1,000 years so they are not sent to the fiery lake with fallen angels.
When Jesus died He fulfilled a list of things that are found in the Bible, if sin is the item being explored there would be no need for certain things to be mentioned in the OT. When Neb. was made a 'king of kings' he was also given dominion over 'all other flesh' as well as mankind. When Jesus comes as defined in Re:19 He is the 'King of Kings' and He prepares a 'supper; for a few beings from the 'other flesh' as all the rest died during the pouring out of the 7 vials (same as Moses only 3 1/2 hours from start to finish) and then the resurrections associated with who will be alive for the 1,000 years will finish off that first day.
Re:16:3:
And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea;
and it became as the blood of a dead man:
and every living soul died in the sea.
Ho:2:18:
And in that day will I make a covenant for them with the beasts of the field,
and with the fowls of heaven,
and with the creeping things of the ground:
and I will break the bow and the sword and the battle out of the earth,
and will make them to lie down safely.
Ho:4:3:
Therefore shall the land mourn,
and every one that dwelleth therein shall languish,
with the beasts of the field,
and with the fowls of heaven;
yea,
the fishes of the sea also shall be taken away.
Da:2:36-38:
This is the dream;
and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.
Thou,
O king,
art a king of kings:
for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom,
power,
and strength,
and glory.
And wheresoever the children of men dwell,
the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand,
and hath made thee ruler over them all.
Thou art this head of gold.
Da:7:12:
As concerning the rest of the beasts,
they had their dominion taken away:
yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.
Isa:56:1-10:
Thus saith the LORD,
Keep ye judgment,
and do justice:
for my salvation is near to come,
and my righteousness to be revealed.
Blessed is the man that doeth this,
and the son of man that layeth hold on it;
that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it,
and keepeth his hand from doing any evil.
Neither let the son of the stranger,
that hath joined himself to the LORD,
speak,
saying,
The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people:
neither let the eunuch say,
Behold,
I am a dry tree.
For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths,
and choose the things that please me,
and take hold of my covenant;
Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters:
I will give them an everlasting name,
that shall not be cut off.
Also the sons of the stranger,
that join themselves to the LORD,
to serve him,
and to love the name of the LORD,
to be his servants,
every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it,
and taketh hold of my covenant;
Even them will I bring to my holy mountain,
and make them joyful in my house of prayer:
their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar;
for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people.
The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith,
Yet will I gather others to him,
beside those that are gathered unto him.
All ye beasts of the field,
come to devour,
yea,
all ye beasts in the forest.
His watchmen are blind:
they are all ignorant,
they are all dumb dogs,
they cannot bark;
sleeping,
lying down,
loving to slumber.
That is the first deaths and the last deaths of the beasts of the field, since He is the God of the Living the book of life is opened up in the new earth once there are some pastures available for them as they will need to eat to remain alive, children will be like Adam and Eve for their first 120 years and then they will be immortal to travels like Enoch had will be daily activities. If you read his book you would know why nobody asked him how his day went.
Lu:12:6-7:
Are not five sparrows sold for two farthings,
and not one of them is forgotten before God?
But even the very hairs of your head are all numbered.
Fear not therefore:
ye are of more value than many sparrows.
Your off brother. Don't read things into the scriptures
@@matthewbaker6093 I'm pretty familiar with how the literalist Christian views the Bible.
@@waynegabler6570 good thing I'm not one 😊
@@matthewbaker6093 You are still a child of Adam and Eve so you won't be escaping any prophecies that affect the group God decides you belong to.
@@waynegabler6570 I follow Torah and love God with all my heart. That is enough
Why did God clothe Adam and Eve in fur and not cotton or sheep wool? Where did the fur come from? it's clear that god slaughtered the first animals and introduced the sacrificial system. I'm sure if a sacrifice is not necessary for the forgiveness of sins then God would not have killed the first animals? This was the first substitutionary sacrifice. God told Adam that if they would eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil they would surely die. However after they ate, they didn't die, at least not immediately. Yet instead of Adam and Eve animals died instead. Now, this sacrifice wasn't perfect because eventually Adam and Eve would die, too. They were banned from the Garden of Eden so they would not eat of the tree of life and live forever. If they hadn't been banned from the Garden, they would live forever. So, clearly, they didn't die because of eating the fruit, but because they were banned from the Garden of Eden. God provided a solution that life could go on for mankind without violating his word that they surely would die. He provided a way out through the sacrificial system that would eventually lead to the perfect sacrifice which was in Jesus as prophesied in Isaiah 53. I know that Rabbi Tovia Singer claims that the servant speaks about Israel as a nation, but this is not possible when reading the context. I, as many other Christians, have read the whole context, and we can see that the term "my servant" applies often to Israel. However it is also used to describe individual persons, too, as Isaiah himself (Isa 20:3), Eliakim (Isa 22:20), David (Isa 37:35), etc. To imply that it always refers to Israel as a nation is disingenuous.
Now, saying all this I do agree on many points Rabbi Tovia Singer says because there is a lot of nonsense being taught in the churches like the Trinity, the virgin birth, the deity of Christ, etc. The New Testament in my opinion is not on par with the TeNaCh. Christians before Constantine only upheld the TeNaCh as inspired Word of God. Yes, there were letters of Paul, Peter, James, John, etc. and some gospels in various churches that were read in them for instruction in the faith but today we have mostly forgotten the full context in which they were written and we can't be sure that they were not redacted during the times of Constantine and Theodosius the Great to make them fit in with Roman Catholic doctrines which embraced many pagan ideas. For example one of the oldest Coptic gospel of Matthew clearly has Joseph as a father of Jesus and he only became the Son of God during baptism, which implies that the baptism was not just an immersion in water scene but actual a coronation where Jesus was like David anointed by a prophet, in this case not Samuel but John the Baptist, to be the next king of Israel. This is also the accusation for which he was crucified by the Romans because they would not tolerate a rival king.
The gospels often portray the Jews as those who had to convince Pilate to crucify Jesus. This is historical not possible. Jesus was betrayed by one of his own disciples and Jewish authorities brought Jesus to be judged by the Romans because they did not want to risk the wrath of Rome when Jesus was trying to take the throne and start an uprising. It even says this in the gospels when Caiaphas said it's better for one man to die than that the whole nation to perish. Was that evil or was this not a responsible way to deal with the situation to protect the nation from greater harm. The idea however later that Pilate want to free Jesus because he couldn't find any fault in him is a crazy one. He was not concerned about any flaws in Jesus except that the people saw in him the messiah, the next king of Israel. That's why Jesus was given an audience with Pilate and Herodes, because they accepted the claim to royalty in him and maybe wanted to see how serious a threat he was. Clearly it never was about Jesus being a criminal, but a legitimate heir to the throne of David. Jesus never betrayed the cause for which he felt he was born and willingly died at the hands of the Romans. He wasn't the messiah in the sense that he would rule Israel and free them from the Roman oppression, but he was the suffering servant who died for the sins of Israel and also Rome and in extension the whole world. As Christians we do believe he will come back as the Messiah, the king of all kings who will rule with an iron rod. By extension the gentiles have been grafted into Israel through faith in the atoning sacrifice of Jesus and together with the Jews we're waiting for the messiah to fulfil all the remaining prophesies in scripture.
Here are the words of Jesus from Matthews gospel:
"Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. 16Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven. 17Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. 19Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven."
Clearly not everything has been fulfilled yet and heaven and earth have not passed away, therefore these words still apply and with them the Torah. The only difference between the Old Covenant and the New is that now it's not just about the Jews as a Nation, but the whole world, everybody is now included in the expectation of the messiah. Yes, Jews have a special role in the world, they are our teachers. And for this I'm extremely thankful for the teachings of Rabbi Tovia Singer and many other rabbis who make their teachings available on the internet. I have learned so much from them. One thing we all have in common is that we all have blind spots where we don't clearly see the truth. For that reason it is important not to judge too harshly but to be gracious. Nobody of us has all the truth.
Honest question: if a person sinned unintentionally, how are they supposed to know it's sin?
O think it's like driving over the speed limit without realising how fast you are going.
@@StevenFarthing thanks
"Jesus" did not die from bleeding. He did not shed blood. He did not pour out blood. 'Blood' is used in NT simply as a symbol word for his death on the cross. Cf. Heb 9:22 " ... no forgiveness without blood-pouring" - here it is blood of animal sacrifice, not blood of Jesus. Blood atonement is a well-trenched Christian midrash, not something in the New Testament.
I hate the winter let it stay warm.
1And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: אוַיְדַבֵּ֥ר יְהוָֹ֖ה אֶל־משֶׁ֥ה לֵּאמֹֽר:
2Speak to Aaron and to his sons, and to all the children of Israel, and say to them: This is the thing the Lord has commanded, saying: בדַּבֵּ֨ר אֶל־אַֽהֲרֹ֜ן וְאֶל־בָּנָ֗יו וְאֶל֙ כָּל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וְאָֽמַרְתָּ֖ אֲלֵיהֶ֑ם זֶ֣ה הַדָּבָ֔ר אֲשֶׁר־צִוָּ֥ה יְהוָֹ֖ה לֵאמֹֽר:
3Any man of the House of Israel, who slaughters an ox, a lamb, or a goat inside the camp, or who slaughters outside the camp, גאִ֥ישׁ אִישׁ֙ מִבֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל אֲשֶׁ֨ר יִשְׁחַ֜ט שׁ֥וֹר אוֹ־כֶ֛שֶׂב אוֹ־עֵ֖ז בַּמַּֽחֲנֶ֑ה א֚וֹ אֲשֶׁ֣ר יִשְׁחָ֔ט מִח֖וּץ לַמַּֽחֲנֶֽה:
4but does not bring it to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting to offer up as a sacrifice to the Lord before the Mishkan of the Lord, this [act] shall be counted for that man as blood he has shed blood, and that man shall be cut off from among his people; דוְאֶל־פֶּ֜תַח אֹ֣הֶל מוֹעֵד֘ לֹ֣א הֱבִיאוֹ֒ לְהַקְרִ֤יב קָרְבָּן֙ לַֽיהֹוָ֔ה לִפְנֵ֖י מִשְׁכַּ֣ן יְהוָֹ֑ה דָּ֣ם יֵֽחָשֵׁ֞ב לָאִ֤ישׁ הַהוּא֙ דָּ֣ם שָׁפָ֔ךְ וְנִכְרַ֛ת הָאִ֥ישׁ הַה֖וּא מִקֶּ֥רֶב עַמּֽוֹ:
5in order that the children of Israel should bring their offerings which they slaughter on the open field, and bring them to the Lord, to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, to the kohen, and slaughter them as peace offerings to the Lord. הלְמַ֩עַן֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר יָבִ֜יאוּ בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל אֶת־זִבְחֵיהֶם֘ אֲשֶׁ֣ר הֵ֣ם זֹֽבְחִים֘ עַל־פְּנֵ֣י הַשָּׂדֶה֒ וֶֽהֱבִיאֻ֣ם לַֽיהֹוָ֗ה אֶל־פֶּ֛תַח אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵ֖ד אֶל־הַכֹּהֵ֑ן וְזָ֨בְח֜וּ זִבְחֵ֧י שְׁלָמִ֛ים לַֽיהוָֹ֖ה אוֹתָֽם:
6And the kohen shall dash the blood upon the altar of the Lord at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting, and he shall cause the fat to go up in smoke, as a pleasing fragrance to the Lord. ווְזָרַ֨ק הַכֹּהֵ֤ן אֶת־הַדָּם֙ עַל־מִזְבַּ֣ח יְהֹוָ֔ה פֶּ֖תַח אֹ֣הֶל מוֹעֵ֑ד וְהִקְטִ֣יר הַחֵ֔לֶב לְרֵ֥יחַ נִיחֹ֖חַ לַֽיהוָֹֽה:
7And they shall no longer slaughter their sacrifices to the satyrs after which they stray. This shall be an eternal statute for them, for [all] their generations. זוְלֹֽא־יִזְבְּח֥וּ עוֹד֙ אֶת־זִבְחֵיהֶ֔ם לַשְּׂעִירִ֕ם אֲשֶׁ֛ר הֵ֥ם זֹנִ֖ים אַֽחֲרֵיהֶ֑ם חֻקַּ֥ת עוֹלָ֛ם תִּֽהְיֶה־זֹּ֥את לָהֶ֖ם לְדֹֽרֹתָֽם:
8And you should say to them: Any man of the House of Israel or of the strangers who will sojourn among them, who offers up a burnt offering or [any other] sacrifice, ח וַֽאֲלֵהֶ֣ם תֹּאמַ֔ר אִ֥ישׁ אִישׁ֙ מִבֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל וּמִן־הַגֵּ֖ר אֲשֶׁר־יָג֣וּר בְּתוֹכָ֑ם אֲשֶׁר־יַֽעֲלֶ֥ה עֹלָ֖ה אוֹ־זָֽבַח:
9but does not bring it to the entrance of the Tent of Meeting to make it [a sacrifice] to the Lord, that man shall be cut off from his people. טוְאֶל־פֶּ֜תַח אֹ֤הֶל מוֹעֵד֙ לֹ֣א יְבִיאֶ֔נּוּ לַֽעֲשׂ֥וֹת אֹת֖וֹ לַֽיהוָֹ֑ה וְנִכְרַ֛ת הָאִ֥ישׁ הַה֖וּא מֵֽעַמָּֽיו:
10And any man of the House of Israel or of the strangers that sojourn among them, who eats any blood, I will set My attention upon the soul who eats the blood, and I will cut him off from among his people. יוְאִ֨ישׁ אִ֜ישׁ מִבֵּ֣ית יִשְׂרָאֵ֗ל וּמִן־הַגֵּר֙ הַגָּ֣ר בְּתוֹכָ֔ם אֲשֶׁ֥ר יֹאכַ֖ל כָּל־דָּ֑ם וְנָֽתַתִּ֣י פָנַ֗י בַּנֶּ֨פֶשׁ֙ הָֽאֹכֶ֣לֶת אֶת־הַדָּ֔ם וְהִכְרַתִּ֥י אֹתָ֖הּ מִקֶּ֥רֶב עַמָּֽהּ:
11For the soul of the flesh is in the blood, and I have therefore given it to you [to be placed] upon the altar, to atone for your souls. For it is the blood that atones for the soul. יאכִּי־נֶ֣פֶשׁ הַבָּשָׂר֘ בַּדָּ֣ם הִוא֒ וַֽאֲנִ֞י נְתַתִּ֤יו לָכֶם֙ עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חַ לְכַפֵּ֖ר עַל־נַפְשֹֽׁתֵיכֶ֑ם כִּֽי־הַדָּ֥ם ה֖וּא בַּנֶּ֥פֶשׁ יְכַפֵּֽר:
So the Torah required a sacrifice regardless of the kind, there also was a requirement for a priest and a alter, also ark, so what do we do now??, how does it work??
It's been 2 years no one yet answered you...
The scriptures says that repentance and the worship of your lips is like a bull sacrifice.
Also you cannot just sacrifice Animals where ever you please,G-d has to give a specific place where you could do it, there is no longer a place to do it so no one can
There is only one passage in the new testament that seems to say there is no atonement without blood. In context it says nothing of the sort so there is literally nothing in the new testament that teaches atonement has to be made with blood.
what about the symbolic act of drinking jesus' blood and eating his flesh?
@@Vibestr In John six where Jesus talks about drinking his blood he explains he's not talking about his physical blood but his words. Drinking blood is a metaphor for believing his words. As the bread that comes down from heaven, eating his body is also a metaphor for hearing and believing the words of God. Jesus also described his blood as "the new covenant in his blood." The new covenant is the law written on the heart. This is also accomplished by hearing, believing, then being transformed by the teaching of Jesus.
@@theologicaldarkweb2695
Really interesting. Thanks for the clarification. Do you know where I could read up more on this?
@@Vibestr That's the tricky part. The only sources I know are books of the bible.
Check out Exodus 24: Blood is a "token of the covenant"
John 6. Labor to believe... my words are spirit... etc. Lev 17:11 talks about life in the blood which is what Jesus means when he says "My words are spirit and life" so "drink my blood" is "take in my life by my life giving words."
I'm in the process of writing a book about all this stuff. Guess I should get my butt in gear and finish it.
@@theologicaldarkweb2695
Really cool man. There is an academic that writes about some of this stuff. Her name is April DeConick. Lewis Keizer is another academic that talks about these things.
But Torah said the best of atoNement is by cHarity, which will atoNe for any sins.. then buRning inceNse, if you are not weaLthy.. then the leaSt, is bLood sacRifice..
Yet the bLood sacRifice itself can only atoNe for sMall and Lesser sins which is UninteNtional or you are unaware of.. like Steping on buGs, or what your Son do outside the house..
Or to pay back for what have you take from others Unjustly..
So jesus's sacRifce is not soo Jew.. only a made up story by iGnorants..
And i'm not even a Jew.. i'm a muslim.. 🙄
20:21 bookmark
the authodox church does not believe in penal substitution
I'm actually surprised sometimes that the rabbis claim not to understand the Christian view of sin and atonement vis a necessity for blood. Within Judaism itself you have the Noachide laws. All of the Noachide laws with the exception of one are negative commandments. The penalty for violating any one of these seven is the death penalty. Why the death penalty? Because G-d expects life for life. Kayn brought a grain offering, (the offering that a poor man can bring according to the Torah if he cant afford an animal) while Abel brought a 1stling of his flock. What was the difference between the two? Abel offered hashem a life, meant to stand in for his own life.
Daniel prayed for forgiveness, but then as a consequence of that prayer offered G-d his very life when he was thrown into the lion's den by the king. Abraham offered his life when he was thrown into a furnace. Why did G-d make Adam and Eve garments of skins, instead of the garments of leaves? Sampson's last act of Teshuvah involves him giving his life for all the people.
Why was it that the Sin of Adam caused death to fall on both the righteous and the wicked for all time? (the Talmud even says that there were righteous men who died solely because of Adam's sin.)
The Christians may have run with the idea of an ancestral sin, but they certainly did not invent it. They also did not invent the idea that a person can suffer even if someone else did the sinning.
G-d expecting life for life is the only way to adequately explain the justice of G-d and theodicy in the Bible.
Rabbi Singer made a video a ways back talking about why the baby died that David had with Uriah's wife. His answer was basically that G-d needed to take the baby so that the public at large could see the consequences of David's sin being visited upon him, (even though David had already repented in front of the prophet,) and rabbi Singer also said that the baby was technically not a separate being from David because it was not old enough to be defined as its own being. (So Ezekiel 18 and not visiting sins of fathers on sons doesn't apply in that case.)
If Ezekiel 18 doesn't apply to a baby (because they are not separate from their parents,) then what does G-d's holiness even mean? All the babies that died in the flood, the 1st born in Egypt, etc. all died because of the sins of others, not their own.
Look at the flood. It says "Noah found grace in the eyes of G-d," and also tells us that Noah was righteous in his generation. IE compared to the rest of his generation Noah was righteous, but he wasn't as righteous as say, Abraham. After the entire ordeal of the flood, Noah plants a Vineyard, and bam...people are violating G-d's commands again. IE G-d allowed infants to die (due to wicked parents,) but allowed a so so righteous guy to live, to only mess up shortly after the flood.
Saying that everyone sinned in Adam, and that the wage of sin is death, doesn't sound nice, but at least its an explanation of how we can possibly call G-d just. One standard for all.
The rabbis talk about G-d's justice and fairness, and his eagerness to accept prayer and repentance over sacrifice, but the law itself, even as defined within the scope of rabbinic interpretation, still requires life, even the life of the one who did not sin for themselves, it just depends on the circumstances, ie infants or young children.
At least the Christian starts with the premise that all humans are equally in the same boat. All humans can rely on is G-d's grace, not their own effort, and G-d is the only one who can make one righteous.
When the rabbis describe Adam Ha Rishon, they describe him as not knowing good V evil, but indeed knowing full well what was true and what was false when he sinned, IE Adam was a righteous man who had the closest possible relationship one can have with G-d, and yet he sinned of his own volition anyway because he wanted to know more.
The Christian is only saying that for G-d's justice to be intact, and for reward and punishment to have any meaning at all for us, we have to get back to where it was at the start. IE one man with the closest relationship to G-d, who is free of sin, was made in the image of G-d, and who likewise is tempted, but who makes the right choice where Adam made the wrong one, Obedience over disobedience, so that in him we all live
.
you have a gross misunderstanding of things
@@jerjmanuel if you could post the sources that aren't midrashim to discount what I said, then great.
Where I wrote about the punishment for violating any of the noahide laws being the death penalty, it is the halacha. Look it up.
When I posted about the baby that David had with uriah's wife, I stated verbatim What Rabbi singer said in one of his other videos as to the rationale for the baby dying, why it had to happen, etc. So you don't have a problem with me on that, but Rabbi singer..
All I was pointing out was that it's easy to infer from the scriptures where the Christians get their ideas about sin from. I'm not saying that they are right by any stretch of the imagination.
Write-lea turpurr-N-tapedshuned, Genesis Chapter 9 verses 5 thru 6 means It was King David saying He was in a fetal position fighting 9 Lions that were attacking him. Only those hoo nose how 2 turp write k peach e. 👁been turpin since 👁waw Fo yers olt. 👁nose haz 2 turpurNtape write.
What about the sacrifice of the 2 goats by the high priest at Yom Kippur? What has replaced that tradition? Christians say Jesus took the place of both goats.
Christians say they took over everything. We are not interested in chrustians trying to misappropriate everything
@@samworthy1257 Do Jews do anything in lieu of the 2 goat tradition at Yom Kippur? Also, after the temple was destroyed, why were there no more high priests?
What about all the blood sacrifices commanded in the Tanakh?
Chara Choppel hose sacrifices were for unintentional sins.
@@4memotivation Bullshit: Leviticus: "2 If a soul sin, and commit a trespass against the Lord, and lie unto his neighbour in that which was delivered him to keep, or in fellowship, or in a thing taken away by violence, or hath deceived his neighbour;
3 Or have found that which was lost, and lieth concerning it, and sweareth falsely; in any of all these that a man doeth, sinning therein:
4 Then it shall be, because he hath sinned, and is guilty, that he shall restore that which he took violently away, or the thing which he hath deceitfully gotten, or that which was delivered him to keep, or the lost thing which he found,
5 Or all that about which he hath sworn falsely; he shall even restore it in the principal, and shall add the fifth part more thereto, and give it unto him to whom it appertaineth, in the day of his trespass offering.
6 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, a ram without blemish out of the flock, with thy estimation, for a trespass offering, unto the priest:
7 And the priest shall make an atonement for him before the Lord: and it shall be forgiven him for any thing of all that he hath done in trespassing therein."
"1 Likewise this is the law of the trespass offering: it is most holy.
2 In the place where they kill the burnt offering shall they kill the trespass offering: and the blood thereof shall he sprinkle round about upon the altar.
3 And he shall offer of it all the fat thereof; the rump, and the fat that covereth the inwards,
4 And the two kidneys, and the fat that is on them, which is by the flanks, and the caul that is above the liver, with the kidneys, it shall he take away:
5 And the priest shall burn them upon the altar for an offering made by fire unto the Lord: it is a trespass offering."
Yes, the are 3 guilt offerings and 1 sin offering for intentional sins, but that is all.
@@hyawill8944
Start watching at 15:00 onwards he directly addresses your protestation. Did you watch the whole video? Or did you stop half way because it was a "lying Jew" and you don't have to listen? Watch the whole video. Start at 15min he directly addresses those verses.
Indeed, Yeshua Ha’ Mashiach’s death on the cross atoned for our sin nature. It is the only sacrifice acceptable to lift the curse, and give the sinner a new heart. Trying to tie the Christian idea of atonement by the blood with the Levitical sacrificial system from a prescriptive angle misses the whole point.
“But everyone will die for his own iniquity; each man who eats the sour grapes, his teeth will be set on edge. “Behold, days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, not like the covenant which I made with their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. “But this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel after those days,” declares the Lord, “I will put My law within them and on their heart I will write it; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. They will not teach again, each man his neighbor and each man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them,” declares the Lord, “for I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.””
Jeremiah 31:30-34
“Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.””
John 3:3
YOU HAD OBEDIENT JEWS OFFERING SACRIFICES FOR THEIR SINS UNTIL JESUS SHED HIS BLOOD ONCE AND FOR ALL FOR ALL THE SINS.... BEHOLD THE LAMB OF GOD THT TAKETH AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD. THE SERPENT ON THE POLE WAS GAZED UPON AND THE PEOPLE WERE HEALED, AS MOSES LIFTED UP THE SERPENT FROM THE EARTH EVEN SO SHALL THE SON OF MAN BE LIFTED UP, JESUS WAS MADE SIN TO MAKE US RIGHTEOUS. THE JEWS LOOK EVERY YEAR TO SEE IF THEYRE NAMES ARE IN THE BOOK OF LIFE, JESUS SAID YOU MUST BE BORN AGAIN AND WHOSOEVER BELIEVES IN JESUS WILL HAVE THAT ZOE ETERNAL LIFE, THE BRIDE OF CHRIST SAY COME RECEIVE JESUS AMD DRINK OF THIS WATER F LIFE THAT VOMES FROM THE THRONE OF GOD IN HEAVEN JESUS IS THE LIFE ASK JESUS INTO YOUR HEART AND YOU WILL BE SAVED YOUR SPIRIT WILL REVEIVE THIS LIFE AND JESUS THE FATHER AND THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL LIVE WITHIN YOU AND YOU WILL BECOME A CHILD F GOD IN JESUS NAME!! JEW AND GENTILE, ADAM SINNED FOR ALL AND JESUS DIED FOR ALL...
Ur brain washed
This seems to be compatible with the Catholic interpretation of the doctrine of atonement derived from Hebrews 9.
Catholics believe that the sacrifice of the Christ atones for all *confessed* sins.
@Paula Wallace if taken literally maybe. I don't think it was meant to be, though
@Paula Wallace yes, if taken literally as in, historically true. But if none of it actually happened in history only in myth then is it still idolatry? I guess it could be.
@Paula Wallace yes, definitely true. Those dangerous elements entered Christianity in the fourth gospel. We don't know much about what early Christianity looked like, though. It's possible that it was entirely mythical, a sort of mystic sect of Hellenized Judaism.
Quick question about this false doctrine. Confession to 'an Elder' is like a deathbed confession. This is how the early stages even prevented a confession to God through private prayer being needed. If anything it should be the Clergy confessing it's sins to the flock and paying them so they don't leave and never return.
Since 'sinful thoughts' count as a sin for Gentiles, rather than 'sinful deeds' as in the OT it would be a river of blood if thoughts required a sacrifice for sin as demanded in the OT.
M't:5:23-24:
Therefore if thou bring thy gift to the altar,
and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee;
Leave there thy gift before the altar,
and go thy way;
first be reconciled to thy brother,
and then come and offer thy gift.
The ' mass meal' is supposed to last the flock 7 days so if repairs are coming might as well start there.
debate one for Israel, please, i ask on behalf of your own soul.
Yes!
Oooh.oui.
Jesus is our Teacher NOT Paul. Paul knew Nothing about Jesus and his Teachings!!!
No gospel of jesus fir you to learn from
If you are forgiven by repentance only, why does everyone still want the 3rd temple?
The more religious people show how the other religious books are wrong actually show how they are all wrong! There would be no discussions on gods if any of them were real!
Charles Darwin and Karl Marx are the God and Messiah of the secular idiot of the modern age
@@okthen2132 good one! but not true! Thay are just people!
Well logically speaking what you should do if you begin with the premise there is a creator and this being has communicated with humanity then since there are many claimants to that message you should asses the claims and establish evidentialy which is the correct one quite elementary really.
@@elliot7205 why start out assuming instead of providing actual evidence instead of just pretending and discussing like we can only discuss fictional stories! You must prove the creator exist first then we will not have to assume and pretend a deity exist without any evidence! The way you think is how you got conned into believing ridiculous ideas!!
@@snowrider4495 incorrect, you see in order to establish the existence of something you would need a criteria first to know what evidence is applicable, if there is a creator then logically speaking the creator has to impart information for us to know wheather there is one. Since you have mention it I will assist you in establishing that there is a creator, the first question I want you to consider is how do you think the first person thought about a creator (the way the creator is understood omnipotent omniscient etc) because this particular being transcends our only physical experiences?...
Rabbi how does one become a Jew? Is a reform Jew really a Jew? If you convert to Judaism and follow Torah but don't dress like an ultra-orthodox are you not Jewish?
Hi, as religious Orthodox Jew, I can tell you that no where in the Torah is written how to dress. Now, you must keep the mitzvot, the commandments, but regarding how to dress, it happen to be that the same way that in a company all the workers where more or less the same uniform, then you also apply it here. Nevertheless, you are not obligated to where the same clothes as Orthodox Jews but at least to where clothes with tzeniut (with modesty). I hope this helps you. Sorry for my spelling.
I ask apologize for answering before Rabbi Singer
reform Judaism is not Judaism. another sad break away sect making up their own laws.
+ChaserTree it may not be traditional Judaism, after all you believe the world is 6000 yrs old, I don't. If a man is righteous by following the Noaide Laws why does he lose this by rebelling against the best thinkers of the Bronze Age. Oral traditions change, boiling a kid in the milk of its mother is a practice not done anywhere in the world today. Why should I have two kitchens? American, Israeli Jews are leaving the faith, because it is silly, like virgins giving birth to G-ds.
Kenneth Tarlow see professor gerald schroeder, phd from MIT on youtube explain how 6000 and 16 billion years do not conflict.
lose what? i dont understand the question.
those who keep noahide laws are righteous, and have a share in the world to come.
it's not literally "only a goat in his mother milk" the meaning of the verse is "do not eat milk and meat together", and this is applies to children of israel, not noahide laws. you can eat cheese burgers and be a righteous noahide.
and its sad people get sucked into the church and their twisted corrupt doctrine. which is why i love Rabbi Tovia Singer for saving not only jews but all people from this evil ideology.
"I can atone, and pay charity for my sins" = relying only on yourself, and not God. How much charity does a rapist have to donate? What about a murderer? What about those who will suppress the truth and drive people away from God and into sin, harming not only their flesh but their eternal souls? Charity and confession cannot possibly cover all sin, the Torah does NOT support this.
If it doesn't support it, WHY DO THE VERSES HE MENTIONED EXIST?!?! If God didn't support it, it wouldn't be included in the Torah! Sorry, try harder idolator.
Rabbi how do you live with the fact that billions of Christians follow the God of Israel yet they will perish and not live on in the world to come anyway since they are idolaters?
they do not follow the God of Israel, but worship idolatry. Rabbi Tovia Singer is trying to turn everyone back to HaShem. not just lost jews but xians as well, so we can all, God willing, have a share in the world to come.
+ChaserTree There are churches that refuse that. Jesus is NOT the Idolatry, it is all of those Pagan Roman days that they have added. Do you think that Messianic Jews are under this same problem? And why can't the Rabbi answer for himself?
+grant mohler Grant, why would it be the responsibility of Rabbi Singer, or of any human, to be forced to live with that? God is the One Who determines the rules in this particular area, not men. We don't truly know what decisions God will make with the souls of the deceased because all the tiniest details are available to Him at that time. However, my intuition, based on what I've learned, leads me to think that being truly misled to believe that Jesus is God might have some mitigating effect on the severity of their punishment. Of course, I cannot say this with certainty and certainly not with any authority of the matter.
fredandpj NT written by Romans.
it is a problem. But, christians choose not to open the OT and read it. They would rather the pastor do the reading and study. They just pay their 10%, wash in the blood and they are good to go.
2:28
What about in Joshua 7
Israel has sinned, and they have also transgressed My covenant which I commanded them. For they have even taken some of the accursed things, and have both stolen and deceived; and they have also put it among their own stuff.
Joshua 7:11
We transgressed many times. You are not making any relevant point. G-d still keeps his promises. When he says forever he means forever
Didn't King David's first son get killed because of what he did?
I assume you mean because of what David did. The answer is no. Maybe you don't know the full story of David's atonement by admitting his sin with an honest heart to God. As soon as he did that, the prophet Nathan told him that God had already forgiven him of the sin. No blood needed. In fact, David goes on to say that the Jews were making to much of the blood atonement because that was the form of atonement God wanted least. It was for unintentional sin. David's first born son with Bathsheba died as an infant but there is nothing in Tanakh that says God took that child. Also, David had other "first born sons" with other wives but none of them were "killed" by God either.
@@jewishgirl752 if all of what you said is true then can you explain this??
2 Samuel 12:14-23
[14] Howbeit, *because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme* , *the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.*
[15]And Nathan departed unto his house. *And the LORD struck the child that Uriah's wife bare unto David* , *and it was very sick.*
[16]David therefore besought God for the child; and David fasted, and went in, and lay all night upon the earth.
[17]And the elders of his house arose, and went to him, to raise him up from the earth: but he would not, neither did he eat bread with them.
[18]And it came to pass on the seventh day, that the child died. And the servants of David feared to tell him that the child was dead: for they said, Behold, while the child was yet alive, we spake unto him, and he would not hearken unto our voice: how will he then vex himself, if we tell him that the child is dead?
[19]But when David saw that his servants whispered, David perceived that the child was dead: therefore David said unto his servants, Is the child dead? And they said, He is dead.
[20]Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the LORD, and worshipped: then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat.
[21]Then said his servants unto him, What thing is this that thou hast done? thou didst fast and weep for the child, while it was alive; but when the child was dead, thou didst rise and eat bread.
[22]And he said, While the child was yet alive, I fasted and wept: for I said, Who can tell whether GOD will be gracious to me, that the child may live?
[23]But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me.
This is something different
@@messianic_scam.. how so? The child died for the sins of his father and mother the same way the Christ, Yhusha, had to die for the sins of the people. God absolved King David and mother Bathsheba's sins by the blood of an innocent child like He absolved the sins of the Israelites by the blood of an innocent man. The point is it is the blood that Atones and someone's blood had to Atone in both these cases.. along with many other cases presented to us throughout the Text.
@@vinnyddavis6328 From what I understand the written Torah has the highest authority then its the Oral Torah (ONLY the legal rulings of the Sanhedrin not the midrash which are folklore and legends) the books of prophets and the writings (2 Samuel & Chronicles) are not authoritative the way the written and oral Torah are...
Good luck unraveling 2,000 years of fantasy backed by globally powerful structures and institutions.
what is the true martial art of the Jews? I heard abir
Krav Maga
F 22s.
Prayer and Keeping the Torah and doing Mitzvot
But was blood not shed for the sins of the people of the nation of Israel on the day of atonement?
during the first exile ( in Babylon) they had no Temple no King and no sacrificial system but they were still forgiven and returned to the land explain that one ...You blood thirsty Roman pagans
Modern Judaism is not based on the Torah and the prophets which God YHWH gave.
The Day of Atonement is an annual ritual required for the atonement of sins and requires the blood of bulls and goats to be sprinkled on the ark of the covenant.
Then a scapegoat to carry off all the iniquities transgressions and sins of the Israelites.
There is no other option for this.
Explicitly explained in Leviticus 15,16,17.
Perhaps reading a book was too difficult for you - maybe video format will workout better.
Jews look at the Bible as a unit; all of the book is giving over one message: therefore we analyze every single word to make sure we understand it correctly.
Perhaps your religions standard is to focus in on the words that match the message of your god.
From our discussion last time - I realized that you thought we were jumping topics - when we were trying to explain why we understand the Torah differently than you - to us all the words are connected - they are giving th over the message of the author - sometimes reading something on the simple level actually will contradict another verse. Therefore we need to analyze the language and phrasing to make sure we understand both verses correctly.
This is the Jewish standard - yes I know you think rabbis made it up.
Well guess what - we think you made up that our rabbis made it up.
At the end of the day; all of the reasoning is very clear - there is no this how it is because I say so- everything follow very specific rules - you are the one that decided not to read why the Talmud actually said or even attempt to understand what we were explaining you.
Have a nice life
@@esthersteier6840 the entire Torah and the prophets rests on only two commandments,
1. Love the Lord your God with all your heart with your strength with all your mind and with all your soul.
2. Love your neighbor as yourself.
As far as God YHWH is concerned, He gave the Torah and the prophets, not the talmud nor the oral Torah nor the mishna.
So who gave these and who authorized them?
After John the Baptist as being the last prophet of God YHWH, there was no other, Yeshua is the end of the old covenant and the beginning of the new covenant.
Under the law, forgiveness of sins is impossible and therefore no hope for salvation. Under grace through Jesus Christ, both can be attained by faith through Him.
Like I said, God YHWH has already abandoned the temple and its ordinances, together with the law and its requirements, and its entire institution and rituals, after the death and resurrection of Yeshua who is God YHWH in the flesh.
As I said, if God YHWH really wanted the requirements of the sacrificial laws to continue, he would have preserved the institution that served this purpose, to fulfill its requirements.
But it's been 2,600 years, God YHWH no longer is pleased with the blood of bulls and goats, the blood of Yeshua who He inhibited has become its replacement once and for all, poured for both Israelites and the Gentiles.
This is the reason why the notion of everlasting damnation in hell or the lake of fire, was never part of the Torah or the prophets writings.
Why?
Because God YHWH is a God of Justice, He cannot decreed a penalty for sin without first offering a path of redemption.
For 2,000 years, since God YHWH gave the torah, God could not condemn the sinfulness of the Israelites but offer as an alternative the life of animals (life for a life) as replacement for their lives, however it was done yearly, as a deferred sentencing for their sins.
When the permanent solution came through the blood of Jesus, the blood of bulls and goats were rendered obsolete including the institution that served this purpose.
God foresaw the continued disbelief and rebellion of the Israelites, and idolatrous behavior. This is the reason, why another round of exile for the Israelites is coming upon you, thinking that the rebuilding of the temple will appease the Lord God Almighty but it will only bring Him to wrath against Israel.
With the false Messiah trampling upon the Holy mountain of God, its you Jews who are to be shoulder the blame, hence the coming death to two thirds of the inhabitants of Israel, the remaining will be split amongst those exiled to Moab Edom Amnon and those stuck in whatever of Israel is left.
You guys still don't get it, it will take an invasion of the combined armies of the world the death of two thirds of Jews to make you realize that Yeshua was the Messiah all along. Learn from history what idolatry has done to the Israelites in the past, yes, it only brings out the wrath of the Lord God Almighty.
@@penitoanikeve7288 the Jewish understanding of atonement is is based on the literal words written in the scripture
You are arguing with an imaginary enemy - you have made up what Judaism argues….
Are you scared to understand why we disagree?
@@esthersteier6840 is that Jewish understanding based on the Torah or opinion of men through debates?
@@penitoanikeve7288
All you are saying is that your religions has a specific set of beliefs -
Judaism has its own beliefs.
Just because your religion believes that Judaism believes certain things - doesn’t mean we agree.
Just like you have your rational for not agreeing- we have our own rational arguments why we disagree.
Which you have assumed must be illogical - that is a childish way of of looking at life.
You have made zero effort to even understand why we disagree.
You do not understand the actual scripture
You do not understand the systematic logic that we use to understand the Torah.
You keep mixing in the Talmud in arguments it doesn’t belong- AND you don’t understand what the Talmud is and how it works.
There is no sacrifice for sin done from the HEART!Out of the mouth comes from what is in your HEART!Matthew says by your words your acquitted by your words your condemned!With that being said if you have committed a transgression of any law,if you answer like Adam and blame your neighbor and God,there is no SACRIFICE available,if you answer like Eve,I believed for you can be deceived unless YOU believe,you are acquitted in that you claimed her seeds SACRIFICE Yeshua!SHE claimed it when she SACRIFICED by accepting the blame!She SACRIFICED herself and COVERED Adam!
Isn't "Blood" in Hebrew similar to Nefash or "Soul?"
Maybe Yeshua was including people into his Jewish Soul?
No the Hebrew word for blood is דם pronounced like the English word "dumb".
...blood is all you need..
@@venio6875 Repent is what we need ☪️🤝✡️
@@venio6875 Yas we do☪️ God of Abraham,Isaac and Jacob,Jesus and Muhammad peace upon them all
God of the Heaven and the lowest earth...Allah....YHWH....Hashem...Call him whatever u want,To Him Belongs the Best Name...God is not a man neither God is not the Messiah
@@venio6875 I'm so confused...are u Jewish or Christian??? Or am I the one who going to the Bible Deuteronomy and Isaiah
@@venio6875 We do believe in God of Israel
@@venio6875 I'm a Muslim.....pure Monotheism☪️🤝✡️
Since the guilt offering in Isaiah 53 is for intentional sin, then couldn't Yeshua be the servant?
There are 6 guilt offerings, 3 for intentional and 3 for accidentalJ cannot be the servant of Isaiah 53 for many reasons - see Rabbi Skovak's brillant 3 part series on this
@@MarkDiffin - Yeshua could be the servant in Isaiah 53 if He came as virgin Israel.
@@organicskincare What do you mean by virgin Israel? If you are referring to Isaiah 7:14 , then the work is not virgin at all, rather young woman. It says many times in Isaiah who the servant is - my servant Israel, my servant Jacob, etc , e.g. 41:8, 44:1, 44:2, 44:21, 45:4, 49:3 48:20
@@MarkDiffin - In the Hebrew Scriptures, God's firstborn son is Israel who is also a virgin. In the new testament, God's firstborn son is Yeshua, who was born of a virgin. Yeshua, who was primordial in existence, came as virgin Israel to restore covenant from El Shaddai to the Jewish people with the prophesied new and different covenant.
@@organicskincare Sounds more Hindu than Jewish.
Atonement is not repentance and repentance is not atonement. Blood sacrifice without repentance is what angered God because of the hypocrisy. Never in the old testament does it say to forsake the blood requirement of animals.
The fact that there isn't a temple doesn't mean blood isn't still required.
The altar was the place where animals were offered. Flour isn't an atonement agent; it is used only when it is thrown on top of the altar. Incense for atonement was always taken from the altar. And even if money is a substitute, that money was used specifically for the atonement processes (ie priest, altar, blood, sacrifice, etc).
jaime arviso “The fact that these isn’t a temple doesn’t mean that blood isn’t still required.”
Why didn’t Solomon say anything like that in 1 Kings 8?
@@chad969 For the sake of argument, say Solomon didn't say anything about the blood. Doesn't that mean the Torah contradicts the Tanakh? As far as I know, all Jews recognize the validity of the Torah.
jaime arviso Imagine you’re a Jew living before Jesus and I asked you how the people of Nineveh were forgiven of their sins in Jonah chapter 3. Would you say that they were forgiven through blood sacrifice?
@@chad969 That is a separate argument. You are talking about gentiles that have no covenant with God. Anyways, the Jews were supposed to be the "priests of the nations" and thus were offering atonement on their behalf.
jaime arviso But it demonstrates that god can forgive people without the shedding of blood. And presumably you don’t believe that Jesus only died on the cross to save the Jews, but the gentiles as well. So if shedding of blood wasn’t required to forgive the gentiles of Nineveh, then it shouldn’t be required to forgive the sins of gentiles like you and me.(I assume you’re a gentile)
Christians have confess their sins then Ysu's(Jesus') dead works as a sacrifice.
Passover lamb and Blood on the door post clearly represents Jesus Christ. We all read the words but rarely percieve it
+Wilkos Wilkos this snot-snorting rabbi needs to have sinus surgery--pretty disgusting
+margaret hall That's what people call "ad hominem"....
+Wilkos Wilkos Wilkos Wilkos, if you read the verses about the blood on the doorposts, you'll see that it isn't related to atonement or forgiveness in any way. It was designed to prevent the destroyer from killing the first born sons belonging to Jewish families. During the exodus, the Jews were commanded to kill and eat the lambs because it was one of the animals that the Egyptians worshiped. In those terms, I have no problem believing that "the Lamb of God" is a form of idolatry.
Wilkos Wilkos so Jesus is an Egyptian idol? Ok
@@newmarket34able
This is mean
Wait, what about the Torah? Does it not demand an animal sacrifice for Sin? And just is the day of atonement all about. Talk about Blood, and atonement. Oh, one more thing How about on the Passover when all of Israel painted the entrance door frames with the blood of Lambs. Was this just a fictional Story, Rabbi??
How can you be so ignorant... Passover is not about atonement... Do your homework.
+IngmarSweep Passover is about passing over death. the first time from the angel of death. No, from Jesus, it is passing over to eternal life. This time, it takes more than the blood of dead animals on your door frame. to pass over to eternal life, It takes the Perfection God working in your behalf stop squabbling like little kids. Look at the Book of judges God had the people dong things that you would never imagine and saved the people from their enemies. Our sins keep us from eternal life, and God gives you a simple way just as he did in the book of Judges, this time to give to you the chance at eternal life. Why are you still so stubborn. Maybe you do not want eternal life If you don't want that, so be it. Get rid of you blinders, and see.
+fredandpj "Wait, what about the Torah? Does it not demand an animal sacrifice for Sin?" - No, it does not. So Passover is not "a fictional story" - but it is not about atonement. Again, do your homework.
+IngmarSweep is there not a day from the Torah actually named the day of atonement. You need to study the Torah. And just what is atonement. What do you suppose people to offer a sacrifice when one sins? Or are Jews Now just allowed to do any such thing that they want/? If so, why has Israel not tried to just wipe our Palestine?? On Yom Kippur, the day of Atonement, is not Israel supposed to also fast to get ready for the day?? You do know that a new temple will soon be built. That does mean that once again, you will have to make many sacrifices like you did in Old Testament times. The day od atonement sacrifices are coming again as is the Final day of atonement. I think if you continue to reject God's gift to you, an atoning sacrifice that he offered on your behalf, then any sacrifice that you give I think will be totally unacceptable. You are getting to be as bad as Muslims, your religion being more important than Yahweh himself. Will you go, and fight against him, yourself when he comes to save you from the rest of the world
+fredandpj You are changing the subject. My reaction was about your comment "Oh, one more thing How about on the Passover when all of Israel painted the entrance door frames with the blood of Lambs. Was this just a fictional Story, Rabbi??"
Passover is not about an animal sacrifice for sin.
please pray that this poor man is given eyes to see and ears to understand . he is so lost and leading others to be lost.
If you are a Jesus freak then why are you watching a Rabbi?
@@okthen2132 That’s hilarious because Jesus was a Rabbi.
Do you mean the Church Fathers and Paul the anti Christ???!!!