I am looking into MSc Behavioural Science, and plan to pursue PhD. Is having LSE on your CV advantageous in the research field? Omitting Oxbridge because those are out of my league tho
Really useful content. Thanks for sharing this. I've read that pursuing a master at LSE is a really demanding experience, I haven't found much more information about llm experience. Greetings from 🇨🇴
I am an LSE graduate and I 100% agree to everything you said! Also, master's at LSE means you are just going to some buildings to learn & study. No "campus" experience, which I think is very important to embrace the school and feel that you belong there. It felt very corporate.
I did both the gmat (first) and GRE (second) because I wasn’t happy with my Gmat result and found the GRE better suited for me! So I submitted my GRE score
Hi flo , i wanted to ask your opinion on the msc in international and Asian history at LSE. I know you had a different department but i wanted to know if you know someone at this program? Thanks
Quite a different culture between Management and Economics at every university. Economics doesn’t view Management staff as real academics. They don’t view Management as a real discipline. It’s viewed as a jumble of pseudoscience based on psychology and case studies. Economics has big grand theories with loads of mathematics of data. It’s totally different. I would expect Economics thinks Management is trying to grab some of the accumulated academic credibility to boost the Management course.
I agree how these tensions are likely to arise. Generally, it is a bit ironic for the Management department to host a program which is 75% Applied Microeconomics, and in turn for the Economics department to dismiss it as inferior. And you could even argue that in Economics, while being very quantitative, its theories can be difficult to apply in reality since in the end it's all about models that strongly simplify real-world phenomena. So I guess the problem arises from both sides in the end.
@ Economics and management are completely unsuited to being in the same room but Economics needs Management to get the students in the door and provide money for fancy new buildings and Management needs Economics to add substance and rigour. It’s a marriage of convenience.
Let me know if you have anymore questions about LSE down below!👇
do you know any details or the applying warnings about masters program: global media and communication in both LSE and USC?
@@Vika_wmj no, I haven't heard about this
What university did you go to for your undergraduates?
I am looking into MSc Behavioural Science, and plan to pursue PhD. Is having LSE on your CV advantageous in the research field? Omitting Oxbridge because those are out of my league tho
Really useful content. Thanks for sharing this.
I've read that pursuing a master at LSE is a really demanding experience, I haven't found much more information about llm experience.
Greetings from 🇨🇴
thank you soo much for this video! this is an HONEST review
I‘m glad you enjoyed it :)
I am an LSE graduate and I 100% agree to everything you said! Also, master's at LSE means you are just going to some buildings to learn & study. No "campus" experience, which I think is very important to embrace the school and feel that you belong there. It felt very corporate.
Insightful video! Seeing many improvements in video editing - keep it up ;)
thanks ;)
Great video mate, looking forward to more such videos 🙌
thanks :)
wow! this was really helpful!
Such a quality video!
Great video!
thank you so much
Great video , Flo! Did you do a GMAT for your application?
I did both the gmat (first) and GRE (second) because I wasn’t happy with my Gmat result and found the GRE better suited for me! So I submitted my GRE score
Hi flo , i wanted to ask your opinion on the msc in international and Asian history at LSE. I know you had a different department but i wanted to know if you know someone at this program? Thanks
What's your bachelor's and where
I studied the BSc in Politics, Psychology, Law and Economics and the University of Amsterdam :)
Quite a different culture between Management and Economics at every university. Economics doesn’t view Management staff as real academics. They don’t view Management as a real discipline. It’s viewed as a jumble of pseudoscience based on psychology and case studies. Economics has big grand theories with loads of mathematics of data. It’s totally different. I would expect Economics thinks Management is trying to grab some of the accumulated academic credibility to boost the Management course.
I agree how these tensions are likely to arise. Generally, it is a bit ironic for the Management department to host a program which is 75% Applied Microeconomics, and in turn for the Economics department to dismiss it as inferior. And you could even argue that in Economics, while being very quantitative, its theories can be difficult to apply in reality since in the end it's all about models that strongly simplify real-world phenomena. So I guess the problem arises from both sides in the end.
@ Economics and management are completely unsuited to being in the same room but Economics needs Management to get the students in the door and provide money for fancy new buildings and Management needs Economics to add substance and rigour. It’s a marriage of convenience.
I have nothing against you particularly but why are majority of students from a BRITISH school, non british?
LSE has terrible teaching. I did my undergrad at University of York and Masters at LSE. York was great and LSE was awful.
Sorry to hear - for me it was more mixed and I actually had some great teachers. Which program did you do?
@@floveil570 MSc Finance
@@floveil570 MSC Finance
It's super woke here, which is unfortunate