it was open to public for little while. plus what you're mentioning is that they are gathering info thats already open to public way before openai was even available!! source is not the matter its the AI software they dont want to share with the world!! reason why its not open AI to every public in the planet!!! U.S. probably want their products to be not copied by the mega fake creator country like China!!! to steal software info or anything relating to national security.
@@TettyBoyFloyd It would be best if the United States were to impose a nationwide ban on Deep Seek. That way, Americans would have to use the expensive Close AI, while the rest of the world could enjoy high-performance Deep Seek AI at low or even no cost. Let Americans also learn to use VPNs to bypass restrictions. And, when political means are employed to suppress, it indicates that all other options have been exhausted.
@@ParsianTV It ought to be interesting; Meta (or any of the big-7 AI companies) can copy/modify the more efficient and free DS algorithm, combined with meta’s data, and gives OpenAI a run for its money.
Because China will fk us if they get the chance. They would never allow our apps in their country. They arn't allowed to use any of our social media or apps over there
Because the US can't stand loosing to China so they have to come up with something to justify banning it so the American people can't have it for free.
The main take away, China has make AI affordable, efficient, and keep it in the public domain, unlike CloseAI. China shows that AI can be 100x cheaper, more efficient, and less costly for our environment.
How is OpenAI ‘open’ when it’s closed source? Democratic values? More like corporate marketing spin. This guy sounds like he’s selling nationalism wrapped in tech jargon.
Funny. How could we classify AI models as democratic or non-democratic? Looks to me DeepSeek is more democratic as it is open sourced and transparent to everyone. OpenAI is non-democratic as it is a blackbox.
Dictatorial lmao ask chatgpt about gaza. Also, whose data did openAI train their model? This interview is a joke and just goes to show why we got at this point
This isn’t about the USA vs. China-it’s about corporate greed (OpenAI) vs. doing something truly meaningful for humanity (open-source and affordable AI). OpenAI has abandoned its founding mission in favor of chasing profits, locking down technology, and creating monopolies. Instead of delivering accessible tools for the public good, they’re prioritizing VC returns and inflated valuations. The contrast couldn’t be clearer: greed-driven corporations vs. a vision of AI that benefits everyone.
Why can't OpenAI to make ChatGPT open source and free to use just like DeepSeek if this CPO truely mean what he just said that they want AI to have the democratic values? The irony is an company from authoritarian country make their AI not only open source but also free to use. I am glad he knows to play politics and the "value" card when they can't compete at the product level. You were not born better, you have to work hard to prove that you are better just like how the Chinese did it.
see, this guy brings "value" talk, and he think people gonna pay 200$ per month for your so called "value" when there are free open source models available?
China: Number one in solar technology Number one in battery technology Biggest producer of EVs First hypersonic missile First gen 6 jets And now DeepSeek I’m starting to see a pattern here 😂
First, he makes accusations of stolen IP but doesn't provide supporting evidence. Then, he disses DeepSeek by stating it's from a country with an authoritarian govt while his AI supports democracy. This guy is grasping at straws. He's showing signs of desperation.
Deepseek published the technical documents describing exactly how they did it - free for anyone to study and implement their advances in their own AI implementations. Offering AI services will now be significantly cheaper, there is no way OpenAI investors are ever going to get a return on their investment.
Bro, the people commenting here are either bots or people who don't have money or business interests... they just want stuff for free... or a cheap copied DVD from Chinatown 😂
No, you numb nut. Democratic refers to values, not free sh!t. DeepSeek is not democratic. It's filtered. What DeepSeek is, is simply free. It has nothing to do with democratic.
But OpenAI is consuming too much energy, it is unsustainable! Your better learn from DeepSeek to reduce and make your model more efficient and sustainable!
While a technology company mainly just talked about the politics between different countries, mainly I see it as a failure already. They will lose competitiveness anyway.
US and CloseAI already losing many engineers heart and mind. Other countries such as India is also jumping on Deepseek bandwagon. Soon US will be alone in AI. Which country will be with US if instead of sharing, US tech keeps threaten others with stealing etc.
I would like to ask OpenAI where your original data came from? Does each piece of data from different countries and languages around the world have the authorization to allow you to recombine, charge fees, and profit from it?
Been using DeepSeek since its release. I find it faster, and able to produce better content. This isn't the end of AI, it's the end of monopolies and overvalued companies in the US.
The truth is that the Chinese government works for the well-being of the people, while the American government works to make billionaires, like this one, even richer. That's why all those millions in government investment end up in the pockets of billionaires. In other words, American policy is designed to create a few billionaires, while Chinese policy is focused on improving people's lives.
That’s not true. They are both capitalistic economies. The reason China did not capitalize DeepSeek and rather released it for free with the code was to send the US a message. OpenAI is no longer profitable as anyone can make their own “ChatGPT” with that code. China simply said, Trump your 500B stargate AI plan will be a waste of taxpayer money as I’ve given everyone in the world free access to AI.
@@김원준-f3t because if you picture a CEO of this super-buffed identity, looking outside the Us, only France fits this demographic & technological requirements.
Tech companies will still be a key market driver. I own a handful of them worth $200,000. But my trust level in Trump is so low that I would not commit for too long. I'm at crossroad if I should sell now or not, my goal is at least $1m before retirement. I need advice on this.
I agree, financial advisory is currently the optimal approach for navigating the financial market, especially for newbies and those approaching retirement. At first-hand experience, my portfolio has surged over 300% since the covid crash of 2020 to date.
@@JaneEveret I'm unsure of whether a financial specialist is right for me I am pretty familiar with investing, just need a little assistance in rebalancing my portfolio for high monthly dividends. I have ETF JEPQ and JEPI by JP Morgan
I've stuck with ''Katherine Nance Dietz'' for 5 years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. To be honest, if it wasn't for the pandemic, I wouldn't have supplemented my stream of income, but I'm so glad I did.
glad to have stumbled upon this, curiously inputted Katherine Nance Dietz on my browser, spotted her consulting page at once and was able to schedule a call session with her, she seems highly professional from her resumé
an "all is well" message. wrong message. message should be: " we understand the import of deepseek. we can do that as well, and we can make it massively better". Problem is, if they don't even say it, they've got catching up to do.
Free and open source that you can download locally, refine, release. OpenAI bots are not going to bring in trillions when AI is now open source. OpenAI lost the narrative and is now tap dancing in the dark while everyone gets working on their own stuff, for free.
He says that 'DeepSeek is the first big salvo' referring to the race in AI between US and China. But Deepseek is supposedly a micro company compared to our Big Tech. What happens when some of China's bigger companies start getting into AI?
Complete PR /fluff interview. The interviewer could have asked him in the beginning that isn't open source more aligned to democratic values? It's like she didn't want to ask him a tough question. I don't blame the guest, it's the journalist to blame. Complete softball questions, the type of journalism we see in China. Really disappointed with @cnbc
I hope there appears another ai company from the usa. I dont like openai at all, they lied that o1 was better than o1 preview and showed some test results however in the real usecase it was far worse.
Stop calling it OpenAI. Call it as it is: CloseAI
it was open to public for little while. plus what you're mentioning is that they are gathering info thats already open to public way before openai was even available!! source is not the matter its the AI software they dont want to share with the world!! reason why its not open AI to every public in the planet!!! U.S. probably want their products to be not copied by the mega fake creator country like China!!! to steal software info or anything relating to national security.
@@TettyBoyFloyd what does it mean?
@@TettyBoyFloyd It would be best if the United States were to impose a nationwide ban on Deep Seek. That way, Americans would have to use the expensive Close AI, while the rest of the world could enjoy high-performance Deep Seek AI at low or even no cost. Let Americans also learn to use VPNs to bypass restrictions. And, when political means are employed to suppress, it indicates that all other options have been exhausted.
Chinese? For saying the truth @@TettyBoyFloyd
@@dianasong4594 OpenAI is full of ethnic Chinese, say 50% of its AI researchers. He’s implying it’s a Chinese AI showdown on two sides of the Pacific.
It’s not between USA and China. It’s between free and paid, open source and closed source, free market and monopoly.
Meta's model is open source.
@@ParsianTV 👍
@@ParsianTVOpenAI is not
@@ParsianTV It ought to be interesting; Meta (or any of the big-7 AI companies) can copy/modify the more efficient and free DS algorithm, combined with meta’s data, and gives OpenAI a run for its money.
I’m always curious who’s going to pay those who spend their for developing if everything is free.
these people in the U.S can't finish a sentence without mentioning ideology.
Accusing other people stealing when you are stealing other IP! It tells you about how good US is thesedays!
USA: Stealing = Good 👍
China: Stealing = Bad 👎
Like in Gaza 🇵🇸
when he mainly focus on the political issue rather than technology issue. you know thy got nothing left😢
smart comment
I think its hilarious that the Chinese blow this pop corn fart and people think its the end of AI in the US....
They never talk about politics when they are on top. Now it’s all about politics and smear campaign when they’re losing. What sore losers
How can I also justify building my game is to make sure USA win so I can get government helping me.
@@Chad_Maxit’s not the end of AI in the U.S. but it’s the end of AI monopoly in the U.S.
Why it is democratic when the US wins, but China not?
Finding excuses to hide their weaknesses every time when US is behind
Because China will fk us if they get the chance. They would never allow our apps in their country. They arn't allowed to use any of our social media or apps over there
Because have you seen what China did to its citizens? Organ harvesting and surveillance ring a bell?
Oppressive communist nation . Use your brain .
Because the US can't stand loosing to China so they have to come up with something to justify banning it so the American people can't have it for free.
If u cannot win a 100m race openly, make the race "Invitation Only"
The main take away, China has make AI affordable, efficient, and keep it in the public domain, unlike CloseAI. China shows that AI can be 100x cheaper, more efficient, and less costly for our environment.
What a bunch of bu!!sh!t.
How is OpenAI ‘open’ when it’s closed source? Democratic values? More like corporate marketing spin. This guy sounds like he’s selling nationalism wrapped in tech jargon.
@@ccca2035 tech jargon wrapped in nationalism
Yupper and to claim they stole stuff when they have how they did it all available on the web proves he is a shrill aka a conman period.
Selling nationalism as a product. Well said.
AKA, you want free sh!t
Funny. How could we classify AI models as democratic or non-democratic? Looks to me DeepSeek is more democratic as it is open sourced and transparent to everyone. OpenAI is non-democratic as it is a blackbox.
You're thinking about socialism, not democratic.
Ask deepseek about Tiananman
So, not even a "Thank you" to DeepSeek to let you in on their source codes so you can copy them while accusing them of stealing?! How very rude!
Dictatorial lmao ask chatgpt about gaza. Also, whose data did openAI train their model? This interview is a joke and just goes to show why we got at this point
The desperation is clear...
This isn’t about the USA vs. China-it’s about corporate greed (OpenAI) vs. doing something truly meaningful for humanity (open-source and affordable AI). OpenAI has abandoned its founding mission in favor of chasing profits, locking down technology, and creating monopolies.
Instead of delivering accessible tools for the public good, they’re prioritizing VC returns and inflated valuations. The contrast couldn’t be clearer: greed-driven corporations vs. a vision of AI that benefits everyone.
he plays the US freedom card now😂
BBQ, Beer, Monopoly.
Why can't OpenAI to make ChatGPT open source and free to use just like DeepSeek if this CPO truely mean what he just said that they want AI to have the democratic values? The irony is an company from authoritarian country make their AI not only open source but also free to use. I am glad he knows to play politics and the "value" card when they can't compete at the product level. You were not born better, you have to work hard to prove that you are better just like how the Chinese did it.
@@TettyBoyFloyd nice criticism. I get that point. Very eloquent.
@@TettyBoyFloyd are you a bot or something?
@@xShiiqey what if deep seek is a torjoan horse - what if?
what if DS was a trojan horse? (free... create demand...and then...)
You must be a dummy. Making AI democratic means the answers reflect values. You are thinking about socialism. Read a dictionary.
This is so cringe. He’s playing the authoritarian card on an open source product 😂.
see, this guy brings "value" talk, and he think people gonna pay 200$ per month for your so called "value" when there are free open source models available?
Taking multimillon pay yearly, do nothing for the consumer
They are. Because it's going to do more tasks for you
@@growstronger6708 "its going to do" blabla
You're wrong. They have a free model and 99% of people are using their free model.
Authoritarian Values AI - FREE vs Democratic Values AI - PAID LOL.......
😂😂😂 that’s was such a funny line.
Authoritarian Values: No one want to visit or move there. Democratic Values: The world wants to visit and move there.
China:
Number one in solar technology
Number one in battery technology
Biggest producer of EVs
First hypersonic missile
First gen 6 jets
And now DeepSeek
I’m starting to see a pattern here 😂
First, he makes accusations of stolen IP but doesn't provide supporting evidence. Then, he disses DeepSeek by stating it's from a country with an authoritarian govt while his AI supports democracy. This guy is grasping at straws. He's showing signs of desperation.
Deepseek published the technical documents describing exactly how they did it - free for anyone to study and implement their advances in their own AI implementations. Offering AI services will now be significantly cheaper, there is no way OpenAI investors are ever going to get a return on their investment.
Is he a robot? Talks like one
🤣
He is apparently uncomfortable and nervous, deepseek expose the real cost and profit of openAI
Open AI is Closed!
If you truly want AI to behave according to democratic values, and the US to win, you should have make openAI open source.
The US Tech companies completely lost the PR war. Just read the comments if you don't believe me.
Bro, the people commenting here are either bots or people who don't have money or business interests... they just want stuff for free... or a cheap copied DVD from Chinatown 😂
@@xsliquidity He's clearly a bot himself. His handle says "USA", but he clearly can't write for sh!t in English.
How come they refuse to disclose specifically which of their IPs were "stolen" by Deepseek?
They are glassy China gave the world true Open AI, that can be taken offline Permanently.
Swear that you will never copy Deepseek codes.
DeepSeek stole all the IPs OpenAI stole from the internet 😂🤣
empire come ,empire gone ,china stand alone ,us is like a monkey dressed as a king
paying 200USD per month to the billionaires to show your support to democratic values? that is imperial values.
for AI to be democratic it should be open source
No, you numb nut. Democratic refers to values, not free sh!t. DeepSeek is not democratic. It's filtered. What DeepSeek is, is simply free. It has nothing to do with democratic.
But OpenAI is consuming too much energy, it is unsustainable! Your better learn from DeepSeek to reduce and make your model more efficient and sustainable!
It is expensive and not environmentally friendly. I think I will continue to use deepseek.
Muh democratic values 😂😂😂
It is a joke
You clearly don't know what democratic means.
He keeps saying deepseek is promoting authoritarian values but wouldn’t make OpenAI OPEN source 😂
While a technology company mainly just talked about the politics between different countries, mainly I see it as a failure already. They will lose competitiveness anyway.
This dude is trying too hard to smear Robin Hood. I think "Open"ai is fighting for its survival. I will never touch its product ever again.
So now OpenAI turns the competition of technology into the competition of ideology to get the government’s support. Well done guys!
Copying the playbook mastered by the arms dealers.
It's totally ok when american companies get hundreds of billions of subsidies from the government, but when China does it it's unfair.
I see fear in his eyes😂
US and CloseAI already losing many engineers heart and mind. Other countries such as India is also jumping on Deepseek bandwagon. Soon US will be alone in AI. Which country will be with US if instead of sharing, US tech keeps threaten others with stealing etc.
I doubt it. India does not like China.
技术的价值在于推动生产力进步，而不是资本垄断
America has become an oligarchy and progress has completely ceased
We don’t need openAI, Deepseeks only
Not even a single good answer. How do they justify the 500Billion budget???? Insane
I would like to ask OpenAI where your original data came from? Does each piece of data from different countries and languages around the world have the authorization to allow you to recombine, charge fees, and profit from it?
Been using DeepSeek since its release. I find it faster, and able to produce better content. This isn't the end of AI, it's the end of monopolies and overvalued companies in the US.
What a bunch of BS. Faster? How can you even tell. All the chat bots spit out answers immediately.
Ask deepseek about Tiananman
Open AI playing the anti-authoritarian card is pathetic. You can run it locally and train it yourself for free.
Rebrand it as ‘US AI ‘ pls
The truth is that the Chinese government works for the well-being of the people, while the American government works to make billionaires, like this one, even richer. That's why all those millions in government investment end up in the pockets of billionaires. In other words, American policy is designed to create a few billionaires, while Chinese policy is focused on improving people's lives.
That’s not true. They are both capitalistic economies. The reason China did not capitalize DeepSeek and rather released it for free with the code was to send the US a message. OpenAI is no longer profitable as anyone can make their own “ChatGPT” with that code. China simply said, Trump your 500B stargate AI plan will be a waste of taxpayer money as I’ve given everyone in the world free access to AI.
Exactly.
I really wish Deepseek's a French company & CEO was a black lesbian woman.
Then these people would have no geopolitical reasons to criticize it lol.
you mean company like Alstom?
Are you okay?
Why French tho 😂😂
@@김원준-f3t because if you picture a CEO of this super-buffed identity, looking outside the Us, only France fits this demographic & technological requirements.
@@김원준-f3t because of all other countries other than US&China, only France sort of has this demography and technology
Deepseek has created an entirely new standard in A.I. Mag 7 is obsolete
Idiot
Only know to spend more taxpayer money don't know how to innovative like Deepseek do
Actually, the main business of the company that made deepseek is not AI, but Quantitative Investment.
01:33 lmao, the face change when the host said DeepSeek
Tech companies will still be a key market driver. I own a handful of them worth $200,000. But my trust level in Trump is so low that I would not commit for too long. I'm at crossroad if I should sell now or not, my goal is at least $1m before retirement. I need advice on this.
as a beginner, its best you seek the guidance of a financial specialist, it may seem costly but could save you the cost of a fiasco
I agree, financial advisory is currently the optimal approach for navigating the financial market, especially for newbies and those approaching retirement. At first-hand experience, my portfolio has surged over 300% since the covid crash of 2020 to date.
@@JaneEveret I'm unsure of whether a financial specialist is right for me I am pretty familiar with investing, just need a little assistance in rebalancing my portfolio for high monthly dividends. I have ETF JEPQ and JEPI by JP Morgan
I've stuck with ''Katherine Nance Dietz'' for 5 years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive. To be honest, if it wasn't for the pandemic, I wouldn't have supplemented my stream of income, but I'm so glad I did.
glad to have stumbled upon this, curiously inputted Katherine Nance Dietz on my browser, spotted her consulting page at once and was able to schedule a call session with her, she seems highly professional from her resumé
Not open source, charging 200 a month for 01, Na...
an "all is well" message. wrong message. message should be: " we understand the import of deepseek. we can do that as well, and we can make it massively better". Problem is, if they don't even say it, they've got catching up to do.
Open AI should not be giving more trillions to squander
He sounds dumb.
Can't believe they're still asking for more money🤦♂️
China all the way ❤❤❤
Msg is clear -we need protection by bald eagle to innovate, lok
Chinese Company open sourced Deepseek. Do the same, do not copy Deepseek source codes and charge the same as Deepseek. 'Open'AI may win.
Free and open source that you can download locally, refine, release. OpenAI bots are not going to bring in trillions when AI is now open source. OpenAI lost the narrative and is now tap dancing in the dark while everyone gets working on their own stuff, for free.
They're spinning this to "It's us vs. them" lol. Pitiful
Who's open AI? Before you call deepseek stealing, please open first 😅😅😅So, I can judge the code 😮big shame 😮
ya sure democratic value and certainly not aristocratic, I wonder who's AI model is open source
Doesn’t matter who wins. Along I can use it for free and improve my basic daily tasks, I’m happy.
Overconfidence will bring you ruin
This is so laughfable
10x in 2024? *XAI2025K* is on the path to greatness.
How dare the closedAI challenge pure open ai and open sourced ai 😂
To see the many hidden comments, tap on the "Newest" option in the Comments bar
I don't want artificial intelligence to be a part of my life
Small private company vs. big tech companies. Shows how miserable those losers are.
So basically, these suits are unable to learn. US taxpayers are in for a bumpy ride.
AMERICA IS COOKED
Kettle calling pot black.
He’s even talking like ChatGPT.
“We want to bring everyone along” is like a kid is losing and immediately goes back home crying to the parents and get the gang out for revenge. 😅
Bring the world's most intelligent AI all over the world to people who has $200 a month to spare for subscription. Meanwhile deepseek is free.
只能说老美急眼了 meta发现deepseek的总研发成本还不如他们ai研发团队任意一位高管的年薪高
Hey , where is my money
He says that 'DeepSeek is the first big salvo' referring to the race in AI between US and China. But Deepseek is supposedly a micro company compared to our Big Tech. What happens when some of China's bigger companies start getting into AI?
Complete PR /fluff interview. The interviewer could have asked him in the beginning that isn't open source more aligned to democratic values? It's like she didn't want to ask him a tough question. I don't blame the guest, it's the journalist to blame. Complete softball questions, the type of journalism we see in China. Really disappointed with @cnbc
He is obviously nervous in the interview
closeai😂
That's the look when you know you are headed for bankruptcy.
Thank you Kate for doing some real journalism over there... not just chasing views.
DeepSeek👍👍👍
Where is Europe and other allies in this competition along with US.
Too often, OpenAI looks pathetic. They’ve created some great things, but sometimes they make fools of themselves.
They wanted to copy what DeepSeek has done, but they can not afford b/c of the nature of greedy
"The chatgpt Gov version respects security, privacy,..." Wait, what? So, chatgpt plus doesnt do this? Holy crap.
Shouldn't an arms race mean those selling the equipment have their stock rise instead of fall?
War rhetoric. It is sick..
Maybe change your company to closeAI before accusing others ? Musk needs to shut them down already.
dude is saying openAI represents American vs CCP..
Disliking and redisliking. C-level ppl in "openai" are incredeble liers gosh.
I hope there appears another ai company from the usa. I dont like openai at all, they lied that o1 was better than o1 preview and showed some test results however in the real usecase it was far worse.
Threat, threat, threat code name I am losing.
Deepseek is an open ai. Free. You can’t compete with that join them team.
This guy should be the official spokesperson for Open AI...