Seeing it’s a british book set in Britain, it’s right that the film is made and set in Britain. It’s a classic well made 60s movie. No vulgarity, no swearing not to much violence. Love it.
The reliance on reasonable, logical, clinical science and intellectual protagonists was a hallmark of British science-fiction of the period. You can see it in evidence in other examples, like Quatermass, Night of the Demon, and even later Doctor Who. A hero who thought his way out of trouble, rather than punching.
4:02 Honeatly, some of the pilot stories ive been told and came across Pilots must have some sort of super vision Cuz they tend to describe being able to clearly see shit at incredible distances and speeds
Allan's reaction to the fainting Bobby is spot on. He's a military officer in the middle of a cold war, you can say always on guard, he's well trained and toxins are the first thing he thinks of after seeing the crashed bus with no one around it and a bobby suddenly collapsing when near it. 👏
In the military, when there's an unexpected problem, the first thing you're trained to do is INFORM OTHER PEOPLE so that if something happens to you other people know about it. Allan did exactly what he was supposed to do.
I think there is supposed to be something about the children that makes others fear and hate them on some sort of instinctive level, that is why the dog reacts the way it does. The village people are no different.
I don't know - from what I remember of the movie, I don't think it's quite as one-sided as you're making it out to be. Sure, the Children are played up as menaces, but it's more that they're POTENTIAL menaces than outright monsters - after all, they are still children, and Zellaby tries his best to TREAT them like children, instead of the ticking time bombs the military sees them as. Both sides, in effect, are right - Zellaby's humanistic approach is clearly the 'right' thing to do, and an effective one - to a point. The military looking beyond that point and seeing them as monsters in the making is clearly the correct one in terms of public safety - but in the meantime, they're still dealing with young children who basically just want to be left alone. That's the point of the book as well as the film: sometimes the 'best' thing is not the right thing, and harsh expediency must win out.
This was such a GREAT review! Your commentry added loads of humour, information and things to consider. Ive binge watched 15-20 of your reviews this week - this is the best one so far.
@@deusdeaconReviews Will you be reviewing the sequel Children of the Damned, which came out 3 years later with Ian Hendry, Alan Badel and Clive Powell .
I would recommend you read Stephen King's Danse Macabre, in regards to his comments on The Thing (from Another World) and it's base novel. He has a lot of good insight on the relationship between the military and scientist and how the public's view of them has changed over time.
A remake of this movie would be interesting. But instead of having the children be the bad guys, you have them as the innocent ones. Like yes they have strange powers, yes they can mess with peoples mind, but they would never do it to harm people, or in self defense. The real antagonists would be the townsfolk who are paranoid of the children, and want them out, as well as the military seeing them as a threat. The good guys would be the parents of the children, well a few of them, as they first try to protect the children, then after certain events place the children in their school/new home, then after an escalation, they move the children far away to a hidden location to keep them safe. The first event that makes the towns folk go against the children, but not right out want to kill them, is when, during the scene where one of them "accidentally" almost runs one of the children over with his car. He was planning on driving past them and scaring them but it did not go well and he clips one of the children with his side mirrors. And the children respond by having him wreck his car, he not killing him, but but putting his car out. The other incident where they townsfolk try to kill the children is when the same guy, wanting revenge, tries to kill them with a gun, only this time he shoots one of the children, sadly killing one, and they in their grief make the man put the gun to this head and fire. The climax would be their teacher who they thought they could trust, bringing in a bomb. And ya a battle of wills only to stop him from pressing a button to detonate the bomb as the parents try to break into the school and save the children.
They could also make it so that the children are only born to women who have been desperately praying to get pregnant but having been unable to - like have the village have a fertily clinic or something. Because that was like the first evil thing they did - invading those women's bodies and using them as incubators.
not really a reference not sure what you mean by that but it could potentially indicate that or be foreshadowing to it, I was more criticising it as an experiment and saying that it doesn’t prove anything that the doctor was claiming it did.
Even though it's written by John Wyndham, I could've seen you using this film for H.P. Lovecraft month. It has a lot of the Lovecraft tropes, especially weird inexplicable otherworldly influence.
This movie reminds me of the creepypasta "The Disappearance of Ashley, Kansas," with all the strange things happening without explanation. That was one of the few creepypastas that did the whole "unexplainable," thing right.
well that joke is dependent on the thing its parodying, I can’t just re-use a concept without context, subtext or relevance, I’m not the writer to any of the scary movie films.
@@deusdeaconReviews you make a fair point on the use of the joke, throwing it randomly into some review without context wouldn't work. It would have to be in a film similar to this one for the joke to work. Thanks for the reply, I always like getting feedback from content creators I like. The user name you're seeing is that of my father, who passed away this March. You and other creators have a source of enjoyment during this time in my life.
@@deusdeaconReviews thanks, that means a lot coming from you I actually started with your Ginger Snaps videos before jumping around to whatever caught my interest. If you ever talked to a commenter named Notalgic Archives, that's me.
ah i see, i feel compelled to mention that new videos will be released starting first Saturday in October and if you need something to tide you over till then i stream live on twitch 5 days a week
Have to wonder how long it's going to be before they remake this one...again. I can just see it now. The new "Village of the Damned" directed and produced my M. Night or Michael Bay!
If you liked reviewing this classic you might enjoy the invasion of the body snatchers (either the 1956 or 1978 versions are probably best, my personal favorite was the 1978 version)
Wait wait wait 2 mins in and the guy sees the officer collapse and he nopes the fuck out of there and gets the military involved. Seems pretty smart wouldn't happen in today's horror
I wonder if you saw the sequel film Children of the Damned, which came out three years after Village of the Damned. Children of the Damned, came out in 1963 the same year that classic Dr Who came out on tv in black and white with William Hartnell as Dr Who. There is a double dvd boxset, of both VOTD and COTD available on amazon if you are keen to have the dvd boxset I have got the double dvd boxset of VOTD and COTD. I seriously hope, that COTD is never remade in colour like VOTD was and IMO the remake with the late Christopher Reeve is bloody awful and also I only saw it once and I would really never rewatch it in ten million years.
The sequel to this film Children of the Damned is awesome, and I hope COTD is never remade in colour unlike VOTD foolishly was in the mid 90s and the remake by John Carpenter is bloody awful
@@deusdeaconReviews hay can i ask you're opening song what is it? And I'm not new cheer Channel just going through your older stuff now. Have you done the remake of Village of the Damned?
Where is that "pining for the fjords" line from, it's not from the original parrot sketch so i'm extra curious where that one came from (I even looked up the sketch to compare the line) is there another sketch show they did, or was this a satire of the original sketch on another show? I must find out
nevermind found it, it's from "and now for something completely different" which seems to be a recreation of their old sketches in a movie version, I need to see that now
the New York Times said it all "it's not that Modern Problems is so bad, though it is incredibly sloppy, but that it's the kind of movie that doesn't need reviews to find its audience”
I've read the book and it's really almost painful how much the readers are just expected to believe "the children are different and therefore can never coexist peacefully with humans". Not once does it seem to occur to any of the characters (or the author) that the otherness of the kids isn't necessarily an impediment to living together in peace. It's all the worse in the book because the man who takes the kids under his wings and educates their little mind-reading tribe is the one who first labels them cuckoos and never makes the least attempt to give them any sense of belonging to their community. The real wonder is that the kids didn't turn out much worse than they did.
Nice review. I've only seen the Carpenter version but will now check out the original. Btw, the link to your patreon page says it doesn't exist. Just wanted to give you a heads-up.
I have a theory as to why regular humans want to kill the kids so badly with little explanation from the start before the kids were shown as "evil". The kids are basically a new breed of human that is far more advanced than regulars. An Apex Predator above humanity. And as animals, humans somewhat sensed the change in the food chain on an instinctual level. The children weren't born yet nearly every human was hostile to them even in utero. In less developed countries, where instinct is less hindered by modern society, the human adults killed the children as soon as they were born. But in more developed countries like Russia and America, killing babies was a horrendous taboo. But even with that taboo, their instincts drove them to feel hostility to them. As I seen it, the kids were just protecting themselves. They read minds, they can see the hostility towards them. And they were terrified. Think about it. Despite having a hive link to eachother, they're still children that don't know much of the world. I'm not even sure they knew about the alien influences and were legitimate unsure how to answer that question. And the only other people who shared their condition were killed off multiple times according to the scientists in the movie. So they had noone to teach them, noone to guide the new breed. They were inexperienced and novices. How do we know if they are at full potential or not? Imagine if that were just a fraction of what they could do when grown and wizened. That is what humanity's instinct picked up on. They were afraid of their potential as the new apex predator. A predator that could turn on humanity. From what I seen, I believe the children did what they did because they were afraid of their deaths at the hands of fear crazed humans that already wanted them dead for just existing. Think about it, they could have killed everyone with their powers. What is stopping them from wiping out the town? I believe it was their intelligence that prevented them from massacring every human in range. They knew that violence would only escalate things, however that incident with the car set them off. They were acting out as any child would. However the action they took had consequences. They only actively defended themselves when confronted by crazed people and mind wiped those that weren't that big of a threat. In a way, they were just protecting their lives from a race that wanted them dead since before they were born.
I would challenge your claim to instead think of them as parasites, as they basically have all the hallmarks of being parasites. They have all this power, yet they use it for nothing but to further their own ends. They are born to humans but are not made of humans so to say. They use the families as 'nesting grounds' and they clearly state to create more 'colonies', and that's never a good thing to say. Now if they had instead said " _We just want to live_ ", then yes. But no, they want colonies, and that implies significantly more nefarious reasons.
@@deusdeaconReviews The 1990s remake is bloody crap and not a patch on this 1960s film or its sequel in 1963 Children of the Damned, with Ian Hendry, Alan Badel, Clive Powell, Barbara Ferris and Alfred Burke. If you have not seen the Children of the Damned, it is in the double dvd boxset with the film.
+Dragoonistiri well the ads for the most part should be on all the videos, sometimes they don't show on mobile platforms or in certain countries, and other times ads have been disabled due to copyright disputes I'm going through, so it will depend on those factors really.
@@deusdeaconReviews Do you think you will do the sequel Children of the Damned, which came out four years after this film it had Ian Hendry in along with Alan Badel, Clive Powell and also Barbara Ferris.
Seeing it’s a british book set in Britain, it’s right that the film is made and set in Britain. It’s a classic well made 60s movie. No vulgarity, no swearing not to much violence. Love it.
The Village of the Damned aka The Delightful Children from Down the Lane The Movie.
I thought the same thing 😱
I know the perfect way to take the aliens out: give 'em another puzzle box that will have such sights to show them...
To be fair I think it being shot in Brittan worked out in the movies favor.
The reliance on reasonable, logical, clinical science and intellectual protagonists was a hallmark of British science-fiction of the period. You can see it in evidence in other examples, like Quatermass, Night of the Demon, and even later Doctor Who. A hero who thought his way out of trouble, rather than punching.
Quatermass series doesn't get enough love.
It's a way cooler idea.
"Munchkin Gestapo."
Brilliant.
4:02
Honeatly, some of the pilot stories ive been told and came across
Pilots must have some sort of super vision
Cuz they tend to describe being able to clearly see shit at incredible distances and speeds
I'm not gonna lie I use to think that this was based of a H.P Lovecraft novel because of the supernatural theme of the film
Wyndham wrote several novels of the "creepy" genre. This was not the only movie adapted from his works. Like, "Day of the Triffids."
Allan's reaction to the fainting Bobby is spot on. He's a military officer in the middle of a cold war, you can say always on guard, he's well trained and toxins are the first thing he thinks of after seeing the crashed bus with no one around it and a bobby suddenly collapsing when near it. 👏
In the military, when there's an unexpected problem, the first thing you're trained to do is INFORM OTHER PEOPLE so that if something happens to you other people know about it. Allan did exactly what he was supposed to do.
I think there is supposed to be something about the children that makes others fear and hate them on some sort of instinctive level, that is why the dog reacts the way it does. The village people are no different.
Much like Frankenstein's Monster in the novel. People react to it's "unnaturalness" with instinctive revulsion.
Hehe, "village people." YMC...A-bomb them from orbit.
Policeman at the 2.00 minute is a young Peter Vaughan, Meister of the Black Watch on Game of Thrones.
I feel like all the deaths the children cause were varying degrees of self defense.
Classic- and with the late, great Barbara Shelley in it. What more do you need?
Those kids remind me of the children from down the lane from Codename: Kids Next Door... So bloody creepy
Nice to see some older films on the show.
The policeman was Peter Vaughan. Over 50 years later he played Maester Aemon in GOT
I don't know - from what I remember of the movie, I don't think it's quite as one-sided as you're making it out to be. Sure, the Children are played up as menaces, but it's more that they're POTENTIAL menaces than outright monsters - after all, they are still children, and Zellaby tries his best to TREAT them like children, instead of the ticking time bombs the military sees them as. Both sides, in effect, are right - Zellaby's humanistic approach is clearly the 'right' thing to do, and an effective one - to a point. The military looking beyond that point and seeing them as monsters in the making is clearly the correct one in terms of public safety - but in the meantime, they're still dealing with young children who basically just want to be left alone. That's the point of the book as well as the film: sometimes the 'best' thing is not the right thing, and harsh expediency must win out.
This was such a GREAT review! Your commentry added loads of humour, information and things to consider.
Ive binge watched 15-20 of your reviews this week - this is the best one so far.
Thanks so much, Glad you enjoyed it!
@@deusdeaconReviews Will you be reviewing the sequel Children of the Damned, which came out 3 years later with Ian Hendry, Alan Badel and Clive Powell .
I would recommend you read Stephen King's Danse Macabre, in regards to his comments on The Thing (from Another World) and it's base novel. He has a lot of good insight on the relationship between the military and scientist and how the public's view of them has changed over time.
There's a sequel(?), Children of the Dammed (1964).
A remake of this movie would be interesting. But instead of having the children be the bad guys, you have them as the innocent ones.
Like yes they have strange powers, yes they can mess with peoples mind, but they would never do it to harm people, or in self defense. The real antagonists would be the townsfolk who are paranoid of the children, and want them out, as well as the military seeing them as a threat. The good guys would be the parents of the children, well a few of them, as they first try to protect the children, then after certain events place the children in their school/new home, then after an escalation, they move the children far away to a hidden location to keep them safe.
The first event that makes the towns folk go against the children, but not right out want to kill them, is when, during the scene where one of them "accidentally" almost runs one of the children over with his car. He was planning on driving past them and scaring them but it did not go well and he clips one of the children with his side mirrors. And the children respond by having him wreck his car, he not killing him, but but putting his car out.
The other incident where they townsfolk try to kill the children is when the same guy, wanting revenge, tries to kill them with a gun, only this time he shoots one of the children, sadly killing one, and they in their grief make the man put the gun to this head and fire.
The climax would be their teacher who they thought they could trust, bringing in a bomb. And ya a battle of wills only to stop him from pressing a button to detonate the bomb as the parents try to break into the school and save the children.
They could also make it so that the children are only born to women who have been desperately praying to get pregnant but having been unable to - like have the village have a fertily clinic or something. Because that was like the first evil thing they did - invading those women's bodies and using them as incubators.
Brick wall huh I though he was thinking about the ocean and the brick wall was just symbolic that they couldn't get in his head
I thought the Japanese puzzle box was a reference to Telepathy~???
not really a reference not sure what you mean by that but it could potentially indicate that or be foreshadowing to it, I was more criticising it as an experiment and saying that it doesn’t prove anything that the doctor was claiming it did.
@@deusdeaconReviews You are probably right. Thank You.
I always get confused with Village of the Damned and Children of the Damned
Love to see more classic reviews!
Even though it's written by John Wyndham, I could've seen you using this film for H.P. Lovecraft month. It has a lot of the Lovecraft tropes, especially weird inexplicable otherworldly influence.
This movie reminds me of the creepypasta "The Disappearance of Ashley, Kansas," with all the strange things happening without explanation. That was one of the few creepypastas that did the whole "unexplainable," thing right.
Most popular pastas are ripoffs anyway. In fact these days there are few original ideas period.
B C But my example didn’t ripoff this movie.
I love the bits with the pipe and oversized glasses, would love to see it in other reviews
well that joke is dependent on the thing its parodying, I can’t just re-use a concept without context, subtext or relevance, I’m not the writer to any of the scary movie films.
@@deusdeaconReviews you make a fair point on the use of the joke, throwing it randomly into some review without context wouldn't work. It would have to be in a film similar to this one for the joke to work.
Thanks for the reply, I always like getting feedback from content creators I like. The user name you're seeing is that of my father, who passed away this March. You and other creators have a source of enjoyment during this time in my life.
I’m sorry to hear of your loss I’m glad the videos can be of some help
@@deusdeaconReviews thanks, that means a lot coming from you
I actually started with your Ginger Snaps videos before jumping around to whatever caught my interest.
If you ever talked to a commenter named Notalgic Archives, that's me.
ah i see, i feel compelled to mention that new videos will be released starting first Saturday in October and if you need something to tide you over till then i stream live on twitch 5 days a week
Have to wonder how long it's going to be before they remake this one...again. I can just see it now. The new "Village of the Damned" directed and produced my M. Night or Michael Bay!
There was a remake. It had Mark Hamill in it.
Aquiarius Von Frankenstein And Christopher Reeves in his last role before his accident.
If you liked reviewing this classic you might enjoy the invasion of the body snatchers (either the 1956 or 1978 versions are probably best, my personal favorite was the 1978 version)
Wait wait wait 2 mins in and the guy sees the officer collapse and he nopes the fuck out of there and gets the military involved. Seems pretty smart wouldn't happen in today's horror
Unpopular Opinion: I prefer the John Carpenter film over the original.
The giant, fuck off, spiders.
Ah, I love your videos.
Please do more of these. The newer movies are great but I would love for you to do movies from the 20's - 80's.
I do intend to at some point.
@@deusdeaconReviews You should review the reamke with Christopher Reeve?
Munchkin Gestapo XD that one broke me XD
I wonder if you saw the sequel film Children of the Damned, which came out three years after Village of the Damned. Children of the Damned, came out in 1963 the same year that classic Dr Who came out on tv in black and white with William Hartnell as Dr Who. There is a double dvd boxset, of both VOTD and COTD available on amazon if you are keen to have the dvd boxset I have got the double dvd boxset of VOTD and COTD. I seriously hope, that COTD is never remade in colour like VOTD was and IMO the remake with the late Christopher Reeve is bloody awful and also I only saw it once and I would really never rewatch it in ten million years.
Wait...people being clever and using common sense in a horror movie!!!???
You should do more classic horror movies
The sequel to this film Children of the Damned is awesome, and I hope COTD is never remade in colour unlike VOTD foolishly was in the mid 90s and the remake by John Carpenter is bloody awful
wow, that line at the end, too subtle :p
Ah angry, drunken mob justice, is there anything you cannot solve?
angry drunken mobs
@@deusdeaconReviews dammit.
The movie came out in 1960, so I would say it was really still a 1950's audience.
do sometimes they come back ! I understand the trilogy thing :( but if yu kan do first one
The movie is actually depicting on how normal hate those who are different.
I know i'm posting late but. Does anyone else see this as an allegory to the red scare?
Now that you say it...then again, I don't know how concerned about communism England was.
Really they were just defending themselves in most cases in this movie
You should do two reviews in one video like titanic and titanic 2
Oh cmon man the spiders here aint that big. I've never seen one bigger then a house cat.
Thank you for such a good job
Thank you for your kinds words I really appreciate it.
@@deusdeaconReviews hay can i ask you're opening song what is it? And I'm not new cheer Channel just going through your older stuff now. Have you done the remake of Village of the Damned?
The opening song is Look at me by Die! She Said, and no i haven't done the remake as of yet.
@@deusdeaconReviews what we decide to do a Christopher Reeves movie list you've got to put that one.
Ditto. All your reviews are excellent man. Keep them coming.
The IS a American version starring Christopher Reeves.
Where is that "pining for the fjords" line from, it's not from the original parrot sketch so i'm extra curious where that one came from (I even looked up the sketch to compare the line) is there another sketch show they did, or was this a satire of the original sketch on another show? I must find out
nevermind found it, it's from "and now for something completely different" which seems to be a recreation of their old sketches in a movie version, I need to see that now
I finally got a movie none of you have ever reviewed....Modern Problems starring Chevy Chase
the New York Times said it all "it's not that Modern Problems is so bad, though it is incredibly sloppy, but that it's the kind of movie that doesn't need reviews to find its audience”
Brilliant
village of the damned review 1995
I've read the book and it's really almost painful how much the readers are just expected to believe "the children are different and therefore can never coexist peacefully with humans". Not once does it seem to occur to any of the characters (or the author) that the otherness of the kids isn't necessarily an impediment to living together in peace. It's all the worse in the book because the man who takes the kids under his wings and educates their little mind-reading tribe is the one who first labels them cuckoos and never makes the least attempt to give them any sense of belonging to their community. The real wonder is that the kids didn't turn out much worse than they did.
I'd love to see Freaks. Yo gabba gabba!
My bet is the new grabiod
9:06 that's a baby girl lol
and Christine
I loooooooooooove this movie
Nice review. I've only seen the Carpenter version but will now check out the original. Btw, the link to your patreon page says it doesn't exist. Just wanted to give you a heads-up.
+MrHootiedean thanks for letting me know its fixed now.
deusdeacon Cool. I really enjoy your reviews!
+deusdeacon theirs a 1995 version made by John carpenter
I almost didn't click on this. I'm glad I did.
I have a theory as to why regular humans want to kill the kids so badly with little explanation from the start before the kids were shown as "evil". The kids are basically a new breed of human that is far more advanced than regulars. An Apex Predator above humanity. And as animals, humans somewhat sensed the change in the food chain on an instinctual level. The children weren't born yet nearly every human was hostile to them even in utero. In less developed countries, where instinct is less hindered by modern society, the human adults killed the children as soon as they were born. But in more developed countries like Russia and America, killing babies was a horrendous taboo. But even with that taboo, their instincts drove them to feel hostility to them. As I seen it, the kids were just protecting themselves. They read minds, they can see the hostility towards them. And they were terrified.
Think about it. Despite having a hive link to eachother, they're still children that don't know much of the world. I'm not even sure they knew about the alien influences and were legitimate unsure how to answer that question. And the only other people who shared their condition were killed off multiple times according to the scientists in the movie. So they had noone to teach them, noone to guide the new breed. They were inexperienced and novices. How do we know if they are at full potential or not? Imagine if that were just a fraction of what they could do when grown and wizened. That is what humanity's instinct picked up on. They were afraid of their potential as the new apex predator. A predator that could turn on humanity.
From what I seen, I believe the children did what they did because they were afraid of their deaths at the hands of fear crazed humans that already wanted them dead for just existing. Think about it, they could have killed everyone with their powers. What is stopping them from wiping out the town? I believe it was their intelligence that prevented them from massacring every human in range. They knew that violence would only escalate things, however that incident with the car set them off. They were acting out as any child would. However the action they took had consequences. They only actively defended themselves when confronted by crazed people and mind wiped those that weren't that big of a threat.
In a way, they were just protecting their lives from a race that wanted them dead since before they were born.
I would challenge your claim to instead think of them as parasites, as they basically have all the hallmarks of being parasites. They have all this power, yet they use it for nothing but to further their own ends. They are born to humans but are not made of humans so to say. They use the families as 'nesting grounds' and they clearly state to create more 'colonies', and that's never a good thing to say. Now if they had instead said " _We just want to live_ ", then yes. But no, they want colonies, and that implies significantly more nefarious reasons.
It's not a horror movie, it is science fiction.
science fiction and horror can exist as part of the same Venn diagram, they're not mutually exclusive.
What is the title of the song you use at the start of your videos cause that kicks whole sale ass also cool video.
Look at me by Die! She Said, th-cam.com/video/HF-eZ55CLxI/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=DIE!SHESAID
Thanks man keep up the good work with the videos very insightful !
Did you do the 1995 remake? With the superman actor
No i didn't as this was the film that was requested but i may visit it at some point at a later date
Deusdaecon Reviews that one was directed by John Carpenter best known for Christine Halloween and the thing.
Yeah, I know who john carpenter is, you don't need spell it out for me.
Deusdaecon Reviews oh right. Nerd power struck me in desperation.
Deusdaecon Reviews well at least that car explosion wasn't as over the top as the one in Halloween II.
8:46 wow, did they really use to bitch slap women like that?
yes they did, it's even parodied in aeroplane
He should review the 1990s remake of this movie
Thats certainly a possibility sometime in the future.
@@deusdeaconReviews The 1990s remake is bloody crap and not a patch on this 1960s film or its sequel in 1963 Children of the Damned, with Ian Hendry, Alan Badel, Clive Powell, Barbara Ferris and Alfred Burke. If you have not seen the Children of the Damned, it is in the double dvd boxset with the film.
Wasn't there a reboot
well more of a remake, by john carpenter.
Deusdaecon Reviews worth a viewing? John carpenter is hit or miss
Is it just me, or is there a change of the pattern of the adds in this video?
+Dragoonistiri not sure I understand what you mean ?
+deusdeacon (I am watching from my mobile phone) but your bideos usually do not show ads (made a typo in my previous comment), but this one shows 3
+Dragoonistiri also, sorry for the typos. A mobile phone keyboard is not the most reliable means for speed typing.
+Dragoonistiri well the ads for the most part should be on all the videos, sometimes they don't show on mobile platforms or in certain countries, and other times ads have been disabled due to copyright disputes I'm going through, so it will depend on those factors really.
+deusdeacon Thanks for clarifying. I was just confused by the inconsistency. Have a good one.
Village of the Damned was really good but yeah they screwed the kids over
Are you ever getting to the remake?
As this was a patreon request theres no plan for the remake, But never say never.
@@deusdeaconReviews Do you think you will do the sequel Children of the Damned, which came out four years after this film it had Ian Hendry in along with Alan Badel, Clive Powell and also Barbara Ferris.