Face touching is a guilty. Face touching. Folding arms. Touching hair. It’s personal comforting thing. His answer was far too long winded. A simple. “ Ofcourse I bloody didn’t”. And the way she looked towards him. She was pondering.
Before he even answers.. He touches his face. "Empathic no" wtf is that? Pair of criminals who hob knob with pedos. I saw both of them last summer in the VIP area with Lord Steel at Musselburgh race course. The things you see when you don't have a gun !
you feel free to grab money from the poor and cause great distress but you shall reap what you all have sewn......that is Gods promise ...you shall be known even as also you are known By God you shall be exposed in final judgement.....the wheat from the chaff shall be seperated ...we shall all have to give account for our lives good or evil done.
There's just no emotion from these two. If my daughter was taken, I'd still be crying my eyes out today. Do a lie detector, I think the results would be very interesting
Imagine (as lets face it our guess is as good as anyones) the additional anxiety/depression/stress that they would be subject to if they didn’t do it but are being considered suspects. All of these can affect a lie detector test. The problem with polygraphs is that although they are good at detecting a stress response, other factors besides guilt from not telling the truth may be present, like having anxiety and nervousness. When you are nervous and anxious, you will set-off the stress response. In matters like this putting someones faith in the hands of a machine thats has questionable accuracy is unjust and unfair.
@@peachy.peachy.peachy you fucking idiot!! How,can they be 10 percent!!!??? They either say truth or lie ... so at the very least it would be 50 percent!!! And they have been proven to be very accurate... At least 95 percent. Where the fuck did you get 10 percent from?!!??? Lol As for you saying they are not allowed in court, everyone knows that already !!!The public still want them to take one tho. They don't give a fuck if they are all allowed in court. As far as I'm concerned a proper world class lie detector expert test will tell as the truth. There is no way in a million years they would pass it tho . which is why they refuse to do one
@@pswizzle9392 u have no idea how a polygraph work. It's has nothing to do with anxiety or stress. Look up Chris watts polygraph. The detective describes how polygraph work perfectly.
Usually when someone tells the truth they don't need to try to convince anyone with a detailed response. A simple "no" to that question would have been the normal response. The fact that GM gave a long and detailed response and the finished with emphasising the "no" at the end suggests he isn't being truthful.
“There’s nothing to suggest anything”. Meaning he knows the evidence is gone?? And a little tiny smirky smile. He knows he is getting away with it? And she laughed and smiled at the question.......
Not necessarily. Particularly if the accusation - or even the _suggestion_ - had been made a number of times before. That to me looks like a self conscious answer, rather than a guilty one.
true... that only is extremely strange. There is no evidence of sadness or dispair. I m convinced they killed her by incident and decided to cover up this. Alone the fact they left three little children alone in an apartment and told the door was not locked is a clue how unresponsible and selfish these people are. They had all the money to engage a nurse for this time.
I have never in my life heard a NO said with so little conviction. If i had any doubts about the parents being guilty, this cleared it 100%. She looks nervously at him, he starts flapping. Poor Madeleine. What disgusting people.
They actually both laughed when asked that question, I would be utterly horrified if I were asked that when I was genuinely desperate to find my missing child! They are so void of emotion, and clearly confident they have covered their tracks, so calm and calculated. Definitely would be interesting to see the results of a lie detector test, but of course they would be the in the 1% it must be wrong for 🙄
If someone had asked had i killed my daughter im afraid i would have been on top of them like a ton of bricks not rubbing my nose and smiling. Ur a creep McCann and so is ur disfunctional wife. U were well suited when u met!!!!
he touched his face which implies he was nervous, replied to the question of him killing his daughter with “no, um, never” instead of “of course not” like a non-guilty person would...
He answers with, "There's nothing to suggest anything......so, no." What a bizarre thing to say. His thinking seems to be that there is no evidence to suggest that he did so, no he didn't. How about a simple, straightforward no? Why be concerned in the least what there is to suggest otherwise.
true. You only take a look in their faces. There is nothing of empathy or sadness as they are asked this question. That really is bizarre for parents who lost their child.
This is very unsettling - he says it so casually, after all he has just been accused of murdering his own daughter. As for the wife, now that's a face of guilt; she's a mother who loved her daughter but loved herself more.
Don't think she ever loved wee Maddie such a shame and I do believe they killed her and abused her can't stand them or their pals imagine having them as your doctor
If you were innocent you would just say 'no', or maybe 'no its absurd' - not ramble on and say" there is nothing to suggest it, so no".....'thats an emphatic no'
The fact that he is floundering for a response instead of a straight out no I did not kill my daughter says a lot. The head movements, the shifty eyes, the way Kate looks at him like she is waiting for him to answer that question because it doesn’t apply to her is all very suspicious. Plus the way he is fighting of a smile when he answers makes my blood boil. They definitely had something to do with her going missing, weather they killed her or conducted in her disappearance they are guilty. Who laughs and jokes while waiting for a possible phone call off your child’s abductor? If she was truly missing and he truly cared he would be devastated not laughing and joking.
stop the conspiracys. the suspect was tagrted via phone number in the hotel of the mccanns and got a hint were and when the parents are at the restaurant through this phone. The supect raped an old woman near the hotel and a kid. in addtiotion a young woman called the police that she was raped by a young men whom she described as similar and german. all cases happened on similar appartments on the first floor in the area. in germany they found videos and data of those crimes or similar and people who knew him went to the police and told them that the suspect admitted the murder of Madeleine. I know its easy to hide behind a keyboard and write anything you want, but you should stop insultung the parents.
@@chrisstorey6972no this is the non edited version. In the edited version he answers no and that is een emphatic no. His blabbering was cut out of the interview.
Not a body language expert but that reaction, putting his hand near his mouth when saying never. Like he is physically trying to stop himself from saying something. Reaction is dodgy af
I really wonder if he's trying to stop himself from saying the full sentence: 'I would NEVER do anything even remotely like that unless I really had to.'
Well that’s the most guilty no I’ve ever heard. If you didn’t kill your daughter you’d be horrified at the liberty of the question and be more abrupt in your response.....why did he need to go around the houses to answer no?
100% Guilty. The question is almost a joke to them. If i had a child that went missing, and someone asked me if i was involved i would go fucking crazy, as would any good parent in that situation.
Actually, an innocent person usually becomes very angry when falsely accused. This is often the case at least according to criminologists who have examined this in academia.
@@MegaWarell correct, but then, to answer with ; to what end? nothing sujects to...and why? as if killling your own child could have a logical explanation...
you'd think he'd just been asked if he had done something trivial! I don't like the way she always looks at him to check if he had spoken the agreed story.
They are the main suspects. It is normal to interview them. In her i have seen surprise and fear when he tells the story. Maybe she does not know the truth.
Read about Fred and Rosemary West for two really evil people who killed their daughters. If they were innocent why won't they answer the questions and such? Maybe in 5 years we will know the truth.
Omg that was the longest answer ever!! The more you feel you have to defend it and the more words you use instead of just 'no' the clearer it is that you're guilty!
Who would say "never" in response to killing their child? It doesn't quite fit the question. Now had he of been asked, have you ever hit your child then his response would make sense. It's not like you can kill your child several times.
You think Kate when Gerry was asked THE question would have looked horrified at suggesting her husband had killed her daughter!!!!! Her reaction was to put it bluntly , not normal.....
"nothing to suggest it" is a leakage of truth. He knows there's no evidence, so he's reinforcing that rather than just saying No. Like "it's a no because you couldn't find anything, because if you did it would be a yes"
This is the answer from Gerry that made me think they did kill Madeleine. He sort of got nervous & said no not ever what do you mean ever. I wasn’t convinced at all. Listen to it & see what I mean
The mother's initial reaction right after the question was to shake her head a little , then she smiled as she turned to look at her husband. Shaking her head very passively indicates that her instincts normally are to tell the truth about things in general, so she had to go against her nature but could only manage a barely noticeable denial. Looking at her husband right away without saying a word indicates that she's passing off the duty to lie to him,...again due to her natural instinct to be honest. I almost felt as if she was looking at him out of curiosity; wondering how he will handle the situation and exactly what he will say. We all know that women are more emotional, so I might have expected her to blurt out a denial in a knee jerk emotional release. Apparently there are exceptions to the notion that women are more emotional. His performance was far more indicting. His verbal response was a disaster in that he choked out the denial so nervously, and halted one sentence because he immediately knew that he had used the wrong words. I'm referring to when he said,....' you know, there's nothing with any logic that could',....he stopped right there and changed course a bit. I want to know what he was going to say after,....'that could',......I think he was going to say 'prove',............An innocent man in his situation wouldn't be hiding behind a lack of proof to defend himself. He more likely would have simply said 'no',...or maybe,... 'hell no'. His foremost emotion should have been a bit of anger,.... accompanied with a firm denial and a strong stare at the person asking him that question. Very often the look in a person's eyes can reveal the truth, especially if the words and demeanor match what the eyes are saying. His initial response was very weak and unconvincing, and his nervous speech and mannerisms are the trifecta of mistakes made by a guilty man. Did he suddenly develop an itch on his face by coincidence, or was it a subconscious release of the truth? I seriously doubt I would be rubbing an itch at that moment, and nervous hand gestures are thought of as an indication of guilt. I think that the young ladies facial expression was partially responsible for his nervousness. The look on her face tells me that she wanted to say,.........I know damn well you're guilty,........why did you kill your daughter?
I agree, before I read on and when you said you want to know what he was going to say after, I stopped and pondered the same on my own for a moment and I also came up with "prove that we did that". As if he'd been upset that someone would ask him that question. But not emotional "this person thinks I killed my daughter" kind of upset. Rather "I thought we went through this last week" kind of upset, like with misbehaving employee that you can't believe brought you wrong coffee again - when you feel you are way too important to be treated like that (but when actually you suspect someone might question you any time so you are also fragile at any sign it's happening). My gut says that because there were no proof, he felt entitled to better treatment - much like guy at office would feel entitled to that, out of all the people, you remember his personal coffee taste. And this is why he was about to blurt badly thought out, "can't believe you are doing this to ME" spirited reply full of fragile surprise that is poorly veiled behind either "I am your boss, I have got a right to..." or "I'm innocent before law, I have got a right to...". Halfway through he realized couple of things so obviously he couldn't finish that. It would have given us too good insight into his mind if he stood there arguing about his position and treatment he feels entitled to, and argued there wasn't proof.
Wow does she ever look uncomfortable when he’s answering that question. And as for him the constant eye blinking and the total discomfort when answering .I followed this case and I must say they do appear to be guilty of being involved in this child’s death
Poor old Kate is so unbelievably naive. Ask your husband why he was gone for so long on his 9pm check. Then ask hin him about the missing blue sports bsg. Is it sinking in yet.
Body language experts usually say that whenever a person is lying they unconsciously rub their nose. This is a clear indication that he’s behind the death of his daughter . How long is it going to take before they put these psychopaths into jail ?
The fact she looks at him when he is asked the question is a give away for me. If my partner was asked such a terrible question I would be hugging him and telling the interview to stop. She knows or at least suspects he is involved in Madeline's disappearance
Body language... Scratches by his nose - to buy himself another second to think of his answer. Elaborating on his answer "no" - a simple NO would do but he goes into there being no evidence to show that they did kill Madeleine. You just have to TRY & imagine if someone asked you that, you would say no & if you were elaborating at all, it would probably be more passion of "I adore my daughter" etc, rather than saying about the evidence not pointing at them having killed her. If you hadn't killed her then why would you mention evidence? Of course there would be no evidence. But the McCanns are grateful that there is no evidence so that is why he highlights it. "Emphatic no" - a no is a no.
Wow, that was very bizarre. The fact that he says "never" is an odd choice to me. That seems like it would be a response to a question about a repeatable action. Like "do you ever eat cake?" -no, never. Then he says something along the lines of needing to ask why, *who*, etc. The interviewer clearly asks did You do it?
He scratched his nose. Just after he said no , the pinoccchio effect. He moved his whole body language away from his wife. Showing he wants to escape the question because the person next to him knows the truth. A normal father would of just said " no " not a whole defensive mechanism to make himself feel better for what he did.
Defo his wife gave him the look of knowing his dirty secret but to scared to react. Gerry probably threatened her and the rest of her kids lives. Or maybe he's covering up for her as he knows she's weak. Either way they both know something 👊
I think if an innocent parent has been asked this question they should get mad how can they think that they did this,and he's calm about it..he's lying..he may have even raped her and drugged as well
A “no” would have sufficed. Trying to overcompensate with the answer is what raises suspicion. And the “no, never.” is just an odd thing to say. Note how in many documentaries and clips, this has been altered to just the “no, that’s an emphatic no.” - which in this case would have been fine to say on it’s own. But the fact he had to explain himself.. guilty as sin.
these two people I find very creepy, it is called " uncanny valley" in psychology terms, there is something totally off in their behaviour and the way they respond, and they have been like that throughout. I think they are both arrogant narcissists and seem to have shown little empathy or concern, they are also just far too controlled and mannered, they come across as not particularly nice people, my personal view is that they are responsible for their daughter's death and they have disposed of her body, they have entered into a pact with each other to maintain a story about abduction, they just don't want to go to prison being the main reason for their fictional account of events.
Every professional that works with interrogation would have taken that answer as huge signal of lying. Explaining why he said no. The longer you talk about your answer and try to prove with with your own arguments, show how weak the answer really is.
This didn’t look convincing you know. Why did she look at him first. I’d have been outraged personally if such a stupid question was asked. Even if it’s a question that should be asked. And I’d defo not have left the kids alone either and then go for a meal and drink. When you have kids you do things with the kids. It’s not an adult holiday. So you always stay with your kids. FACT
Face touching is a guilty. Face touching. Folding arms. Touching hair. It’s personal comforting thing. His answer was far too long winded. A simple. “ Ofcourse I bloody didn’t”. And the way she looked towards him. She was pondering.
Psychologically, over explaining is a sign of guilt.
Could you look or sound more guilty?
Both. There is vocal tension and incoherent facial expressions.
Before he even answers.. He touches his face. "Empathic no" wtf is that? Pair of criminals who hob knob with pedos. I saw both of them last summer in the VIP area with Lord Steel at Musselburgh race course. The things you see when you don't have a gun !
laboheme26 if they asked me if I killed my daughter I definitely wouldn’t have reacted like that
They think its funny
Nope
See how Kate looks straight at him for his response and then laughs with relief
I will look again at them - Thanks
That's a really toxic Lovestory. I can see it at the way the don't vibe witch each other 🤔
It’s called doopers delight a common thing liars do they laugh at the thought of getting away with their lies
@@Zeekim333duper's delight, as in they've duped you.
“you can’t prove i did it”
“i didn’t actually mean to do it”
is what i hear 13 seconds in.
'No, never' , well, you can only kill someone once.
an innocent distraught person would not be laughing and smiling,they would be weeping!!!
you feel free to grab money from the poor and cause great distress but you shall reap what you all have sewn......that is Gods promise ...you shall be known even as also you are known By God you shall be exposed in final judgement.....the wheat from the chaff shall be seperated ...we shall all have to give account for our lives good or evil done.
It’s because they’re anxious
CX JAr that statement says it all really...
CX JAr I noticed that too lol. Personally I think they are guilty as fk. It actually disgusts me looking at them. How can they live with themselves
There's just no emotion from these two. If my daughter was taken, I'd still be crying my eyes out today. Do a lie detector, I think the results would be very interesting
Imagine (as lets face it our guess is as good as anyones) the additional anxiety/depression/stress that they would be subject to if they didn’t do it but are being considered suspects. All of these can affect a lie detector test. The problem with polygraphs is that although they are good at detecting a stress response, other factors besides guilt from not telling the truth may be present, like having anxiety and nervousness. When you are nervous and anxious, you will set-off the stress response.
In matters like this putting someones faith in the hands of a machine thats has questionable accuracy is unjust and unfair.
Lie detectors are only right 10% of the time, and the results cannot be used as evidence in court.
@@peachy.peachy.peachy you fucking idiot!! How,can they be 10 percent!!!??? They either say truth or lie ... so at the very least it would be 50 percent!!! And they have been proven to be very accurate... At least 95 percent. Where the fuck did you get 10 percent from?!!??? Lol As for you saying they are
not allowed in court, everyone knows that already !!!The public still want them to take one tho. They don't give a fuck if they are all allowed in court. As far as I'm concerned a proper world class lie detector expert test will tell as the truth. There is no way in a million years they would pass it tho . which is why they refuse to do one
They got away with it.
@@pswizzle9392 u have no idea how a polygraph work. It's has nothing to do with anxiety or stress.
Look up Chris watts polygraph. The detective describes how polygraph work perfectly.
Usually when someone tells the truth they don't need to try to convince anyone with a detailed response. A simple "no" to that question would have been the normal response. The fact that GM gave a long and detailed response and the finished with emphasising the "no" at the end suggests he isn't being truthful.
An innocent person would have stopped after the word NO, or would have said NO, I did not Kill my daughter. No need to qualify the answer.....
“There’s nothing to suggest anything”. Meaning he knows the evidence is gone?? And a little tiny smirky smile. He knows he is getting away with it? And she laughed and smiled at the question.......
They make it sound as trivial as if they'd forgotten to let the cat back in the house.
My question is why is he so calm when answering such a question? If a parent had been accused of such a thing I think they’d be at rage.
Not necessarily.
Particularly if the accusation - or even the _suggestion_ - had been made a number of times before.
That to me looks like a self conscious answer, rather than a guilty one.
@@letsdiscussitoversometea8479what u mean
He even laughed when starting to answer.
Says it all.
true... that only is extremely strange. There is no evidence of sadness or dispair. I m convinced they killed her by incident and decided to cover up this. Alone the fact they left three little children alone in an apartment and told the door was not locked is a clue how unresponsible and selfish these people are. They had all the money to engage a nurse for this time.
I have never in my life heard a NO said with so little conviction. If i had any doubts about the parents being guilty, this cleared it 100%. She looks nervously at him, he starts flapping. Poor Madeleine. What disgusting people.
They actually both laughed when asked that question, I would be utterly horrified if I were asked that when I was genuinely desperate to find my missing child! They are so void of emotion, and clearly confident they have covered their tracks, so calm and calculated. Definitely would be interesting to see the results of a lie detector test, but of course they would be the in the 1% it must be wrong for 🙄
The truth is that there is no human being without emotions.
I will publish a frame by frame analysis of this video.
If someone had asked had i killed my daughter im afraid i would have been on top of them like a ton of bricks not rubbing my nose and smiling. Ur a creep McCann and so is ur disfunctional wife. U were well suited when u met!!!!
Duping delight time and time again.
They're rich. They can afford to commit murder and get away with it.
you have to distingush the laugh. Some people laugh at the ridiculusness of questions, that it's "got to be a joke" - like "come on man really"
he touched his face which implies he was nervous, replied to the question of him killing his daughter with “no, um, never” instead of “of course not” like a non-guilty person would...
He answers with, "There's nothing to suggest anything......so, no." What a bizarre thing to say. His thinking seems to be that there is no evidence to suggest that he did so, no he didn't. How about a simple, straightforward no? Why be concerned in the least what there is to suggest otherwise.
true. You only take a look in their faces. There is nothing of empathy or sadness as they are asked this question. That really is bizarre for parents who lost their child.
Also "Never" is an odd response. You can only kill someone once, Gerry...
I can't even look at these two. They're guilty as f.
This is very unsettling - he says it so casually, after all he has just been accused of murdering his own daughter. As for the wife, now that's a face of guilt; she's a mother who loved her daughter but loved herself more.
Don't think she ever loved wee Maddie such a shame and I do believe they killed her and abused her can't stand them or their pals imagine having them as your doctor
he gets so nervous and becomes so guilty 🙁
Those are the guiltiest-looking "innocent" parents I've ever seen.
RIP, Maddie.❤
I got a TED talk on "How to spot a liar" recommendation under this video...
If you were innocent you would just say 'no', or maybe 'no its absurd' - not ramble on and say" there is nothing to suggest it, so no".....'thats an emphatic no'
The fact that he is floundering for a response instead of a straight out no I did not kill my daughter says a lot. The head movements, the shifty eyes, the way Kate looks at him like she is waiting for him to answer that question because it doesn’t apply to her is all very suspicious. Plus the way he is fighting of a smile when he answers makes my blood boil. They definitely had something to do with her going missing, weather they killed her or conducted in her disappearance they are guilty. Who laughs and jokes while waiting for a possible phone call off your child’s abductor? If she was truly missing and he truly cared he would be devastated not laughing and joking.
This video was edited, his response like that was actually to another question...Look at the real interview.
stop the conspiracys. the suspect was tagrted via phone number in the hotel of the mccanns and got a hint were and when the parents are at the restaurant through this phone. The supect raped an old woman near the hotel and a kid. in addtiotion a young woman called the police that she was raped by a young men whom she described as similar and german. all cases happened on similar appartments on the first floor in the area.
in germany they found videos and data of those crimes or similar and people who knew him went to the police and told them that the suspect admitted the murder of Madeleine.
I know its easy to hide behind a keyboard and write anything you want, but you should stop insultung the parents.
Not sure anyone is insulting the parents. After all they did leave their children vulnerable.
@@chrismullero82443 yrs no conviction...
@@chrisstorey6972no this is the non edited version. In the edited version he answers no and that is een emphatic no. His blabbering was cut out of the interview.
Not a body language expert but that reaction, putting his hand near his mouth when saying never. Like he is physically trying to stop himself from saying something. Reaction is dodgy af
I really wonder if he's trying to stop himself from saying the full sentence: 'I would NEVER do anything even remotely like that unless I really had to.'
Well that’s the most guilty no I’ve ever heard. If you didn’t kill your daughter you’d be horrified at the liberty of the question and be more abrupt in your response.....why did he need to go around the houses to answer no?
Exactly.
That female reporter should have conducted tbe McCanns questioning.
She knew just the right questions to ask to bring them to their knees.
'Did you kill your daughter?'
'No, no, never.'
'Were you born?'
'Yes, yes, always.'
Lmao
Their answer is very similar to Jon Venables' answer. We know he was lying at that moment.
It’s the way that Kate is constantly looking at him, her eyes are burning into him “stop talking, you’re going to blow our cover”
When he's asked if he/they killed their daughter, instead of just saying no, he goes on and on. I believe they care guilty.
Looked down and started rubbing his face as soon as he was asked that question. Never seen a more guilty man in all my life.
"There's just nothing to suggest anything" The look on his face is something...
100% Guilty. The question is almost a joke to them. If i had a child that went missing, and someone asked me if i was involved i would go fucking crazy, as would any good parent in that situation.
Actually, an innocent person usually becomes very angry when falsely accused. This is often the case at least according to criminologists who have examined this in academia.
@@MegaWarell correct, but then, to answer with ; to what end? nothing sujects to...and why? as if killling your own child could have a logical explanation...
imagine you ask your spouse if they were cheating on you and you got that responce
you'd think he'd just been asked if he had done something trivial!
I don't like the way she always looks at him to check if he had spoken the agreed story.
They are the main suspects. It is normal to interview them.
In her i have seen surprise and fear when he tells the story. Maybe she does not know the truth.
Read about Fred and Rosemary West for two really evil people who killed their daughters.
If they were innocent why won't they answer the questions and such?
Maybe in 5 years we will know the truth.
Omg that was the longest answer ever!! The more you feel you have to defend it and the more words you use instead of just 'no' the clearer it is that you're guilty!
Who would say "never" in response to killing their child? It doesn't quite fit the question. Now had he of been asked, have you ever hit your child then his response would make sense. It's not like you can kill your child several times.
Good analysing... they guilty as sin 😡
He meant I would never kill my child
She smiles in the beginning. His answer "There's nothing to suggest anything, so no." They're despicable.
Wow. The wifes piercing eyes making sure he doesn’t slip up!
Can you imagine if you’d had your child abducted and then someone accused YOU of doing it?! And then reacting like this?
When they awnser the question they both give a little chuckle
It's relief.
They're thinking
"Yes. We're actually getting away with it."
In my best Chandler voice: "Could they BE any more guilty?"
Did he touch his face before answering the question? 😮😮😮😮😮 red flag. He is lying😢
Now that the twins are older, they'll realise that their parents put themselves in grave danger too, by leaving them alone in an unlocked apartment
I thought Kates reaction to that question was a bit strange, the little smirk and the way she looked away
That little tap on his nose indicates deception for starters. They're guilty af.
GOD!!!! Any normal person innocent would have been SCREAMING NO!!!!!!!!!!
I’ve never seen this before and I 100% think they kilt her the looks and sound and vibes I’m getting off them is that they did kill her
"No, no, never................" A simple "no", would be enough 🙄🤔
Basically "if you don't have evidence you don't have a confession".
The nervous nose scratch
He looks and sounds like David Brent in The Office trying to get away with something
edit: Did you kill your daughter? ... no, no, never..
A smirk at the end too, so casual these two are
These two are guilty as sin. I cannot understand why anyone would.protect child murderers.
The normal reaction is to feel insulted by the question!
You think Kate when Gerry was asked THE question would have looked horrified at suggesting her husband had killed her daughter!!!!! Her reaction was to put it bluntly , not normal.....
"nothing to suggest it" is a leakage of truth. He knows there's no evidence, so he's reinforcing that rather than just saying No.
Like "it's a no because you couldn't find anything, because if you did it would be a yes"
This is the answer from Gerry that made me think they did kill Madeleine. He sort of got nervous & said no not ever what do you mean ever. I wasn’t convinced at all. Listen to it & see what I mean
The mother's initial reaction right after the question was to shake her head a little , then she smiled as she turned to look at her husband. Shaking her head very passively indicates that her instincts normally are to tell the truth about things in general, so she had to go against her nature but could only manage a barely noticeable denial. Looking at her husband right away without saying a word indicates that she's passing off the duty to lie to him,...again due to her natural instinct to be honest. I almost felt as if she was looking at him out of curiosity; wondering how he will handle the situation and exactly what he will say. We all know that women are more emotional, so I might have expected her to blurt out a denial in a knee jerk emotional release. Apparently there are exceptions to the notion that women are more emotional.
His performance was far more indicting. His verbal response was a disaster in that he choked out the denial so nervously, and halted one sentence because he immediately knew that he had used the wrong words. I'm referring to when he said,....' you know, there's nothing with any logic that could',....he stopped right there and changed course a bit. I want to know what he was going to say after,....'that could',......I think he was going to say 'prove',............An innocent man in his situation wouldn't be hiding behind a lack of proof to defend himself. He more likely would have simply said 'no',...or maybe,... 'hell no'. His foremost emotion should have been a bit of anger,.... accompanied with a firm denial and a strong stare at the person asking him that question. Very often the look in a person's eyes can reveal the truth, especially if the words and demeanor match what the eyes are saying.
His initial response was very weak and unconvincing, and his nervous speech and mannerisms are the trifecta of mistakes made by a guilty man. Did he suddenly develop an itch on his face by coincidence, or was it a subconscious release of the truth? I seriously doubt I would be rubbing an itch at that moment, and nervous hand gestures are thought of as an indication of guilt. I think that the young ladies facial expression was partially responsible for his nervousness. The look on her face tells me that she wanted to say,.........I know damn well you're guilty,........why did you kill your daughter?
I agree, before I read on and when you said you want to know what he was going to say after, I stopped and pondered the same on my own for a moment and I also came up with "prove that we did that". As if he'd been upset that someone would ask him that question. But not emotional "this person thinks I killed my daughter" kind of upset. Rather "I thought we went through this last week" kind of upset, like with misbehaving employee that you can't believe brought you wrong coffee again - when you feel you are way too important to be treated like that (but when actually you suspect someone might question you any time so you are also fragile at any sign it's happening). My gut says that because there were no proof, he felt entitled to better treatment - much like guy at office would feel entitled to that, out of all the people, you remember his personal coffee taste. And this is why he was about to blurt badly thought out, "can't believe you are doing this to ME" spirited reply full of fragile surprise that is poorly veiled behind either "I am your boss, I have got a right to..." or "I'm innocent before law, I have got a right to...". Halfway through he realized couple of things so obviously he couldn't finish that. It would have given us too good insight into his mind if he stood there arguing about his position and treatment he feels entitled to, and argued there wasn't proof.
They definitely did it
You can fool people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time.. they look so guilty
yes Gerry the evidence suggests that you, your wife and friends know exactly what happened to Madeleine.....
They either killed her or sold her to traffickers and they killed her.
Not “I would never dream of hurting my little girl” it was
“There’s no evidence or motive” wtaf is wrong with them
“No, never” whilst scratching his
Nose. How are these two not in prison
Look at Kate's face while he's stumbling over his words to a simple question.
A single ‘No’ would’ve been more believable Gerry.
Wow does she ever look uncomfortable when he’s answering that question. And as for him the constant eye blinking and the total discomfort when answering .I followed this case and I must say they do appear to be guilty of being involved in this child’s death
The interviewer looks VERY uncomfortable...I imagine the vibes in that space make her want to hightail it the heck outta there.
Poor old Kate is so unbelievably naive.
Ask your husband why he was gone for so long on his 9pm check.
Then ask hin him about the missing blue sports bsg.
Is it sinking in yet.
He is the definition of beating around the bush to answer a question
Body language experts usually say that whenever a person is lying they unconsciously rub their nose. This is a clear indication that he’s behind the death of his daughter . How long is it going to take before they put these psychopaths into jail ?
As soon as the reporter asked that question to Gerry he started sweating and shaking
Just look at Kate's face, not a very good actress eh?
The fact she looks at him when he is asked the question is a give away for me. If my partner was asked such a terrible question I would be hugging him and telling the interview to stop. She knows or at least suspects he is involved in Madeline's disappearance
At a bare minimum, you wouldn't need to 'phone a friend' for the answer!
I still say they are guilty.And they've got away with it up until now.How can they sleep at night?
They even look Guilty.
Body language...
Scratches by his nose - to buy himself another second to think of his answer.
Elaborating on his answer "no" - a simple NO would do but he goes into there being no evidence to show that they did kill Madeleine.
You just have to TRY & imagine if someone asked you that, you would say no & if you were elaborating at all, it would probably be more passion of "I adore my daughter" etc, rather than saying about the evidence not pointing at them having killed her. If you hadn't killed her then why would you mention evidence? Of course there would be no evidence. But the McCanns are grateful that there is no evidence so that is why he highlights it.
"Emphatic no" - a no is a no.
The smirk on her face says it all
Wow, that was very bizarre. The fact that he says "never" is an odd choice to me. That seems like it would be a response to a question about a repeatable action. Like "do you ever eat cake?" -no, never. Then he says something along the lines of needing to ask why, *who*, etc. The interviewer clearly asks did You do it?
Wow, unbelievable! Guilty! Justice for Madeleine!
They are as guilty as sin
An innocent person just says NO
Shouldn't he just be saying NO I DID NOT
No no never??? WHAT AN ODD REPLY TO THE QUESTION
He scratched his nose. Just after he said no , the pinoccchio effect. He moved his whole body language away from his wife. Showing he wants to escape the question because the person next to him knows the truth. A normal father would of just said " no " not a whole defensive mechanism to make himself feel better for what he did.
Defo his wife gave him the look of knowing his dirty secret but to scared to react. Gerry probably threatened her and the rest of her kids lives. Or maybe he's covering up for her as he knows she's weak. Either way they both know something 👊
In her book she talks about her daughters private parts - WTF??111
I think if an innocent parent has been asked this question they should get mad how can they think that they did this,and he's calm about it..he's lying..he may have even raped her and drugged as well
Strange reaction. Would’ve expected a more stern reaction from any dad, or a more upset reaction perhaps. Also saying a lot of unnecessary words ….
A “no” would have sufficed. Trying to overcompensate with the answer is what raises suspicion. And the “no, never.” is just an odd thing to say. Note how in many documentaries and clips, this has been altered to just the “no, that’s an emphatic no.” - which in this case would have been fine to say on it’s own. But the fact he had to explain himself.. guilty as sin.
They are both stone cold and emotionless. They're as guilty as hell.
Jesus looking back at this now after we've had so many years of exposure to these kind of interviews online..this screams guilty
“That’s an emphatic no” uh huh
over explaining things = a sign of guilt
these two people I find very creepy, it is called " uncanny valley" in psychology terms, there is something totally off in their behaviour and the way they respond, and they have been like that throughout. I think they are both arrogant narcissists and seem to have shown little empathy or concern, they are also just far too controlled and mannered, they come across as not particularly nice people, my personal view is that they are responsible for their daughter's death and they have disposed of her body, they have entered into a pact with each other to maintain a story about abduction, they just don't want to go to prison being the main reason for their fictional account of events.
Guilty as sin, the pair of them.
He doesn't even know how to lie lol
Kate's face tells a story more than Gerry's. They definitely know
Oh come on just look at his body language so obvious
Jim Field I
Every professional that works with interrogation would have taken that answer as huge signal of lying. Explaining why he said no. The longer you talk about your answer and try to prove with with your own arguments, show how weak the answer really is.
The more information you try to add to a simple "no" question is highly suspicious
Mummy dearest.....they look as guilty as one can look.
This didn’t look convincing you know. Why did she look at him first. I’d have been outraged personally if such a stupid question was asked. Even if it’s a question that should be asked. And I’d defo not have left the kids alone either and then go for a meal and drink. When you have kids you do things with the kids. It’s not an adult holiday. So you always stay with your kids. FACT