New Searches for Dyson Spheres Found Something Featuring Jason Wright
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
- Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video & for the free product! Head to keeps.com/eventhorizonshow to get a special offer. Individual results may vary.
A discussion with Jason Wright on two new papers regarding Dyson Sphere candidates in infrared studies yielding 60 candidates.
"Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation", Dyson, 1960
fermatslibrary.com/s/search-f...
"A Data-Driven Search For Mid-Infrared Excesses Among Five Million Main-Sequence FGK Stars", Contardo and Hogg, 2024
arxiv.org/abs/2403.18941
"Project Hephaistos - II. Dyson sphere candidates from Gaia DR3, 2MASS, and WISE", Suazo et al, 2024
arxiv.org/abs/2405.02927
"IRAS-based Whole-Sky Upper Limit on Dyson Spheres", Carrigan, 2005
arxiv.org/pdf/0811.2376
TH-cam Membership: / @eventhorizonshow
Podcast: anchor.fm/john-michael-godier...
Apple: apple.co/3CS7rjT
More JMG
/ johnmichaelgodier
Want to support the channel?
Patreon: / eventhorizonshow
Follow us at other places!
@JMGEventHorizon
Music:
stellardrone.bandcamp.com/
migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
leerosevere.bandcamp.com/
aeriumambient.bandcamp.com/
FOOTAGE:
NASA
ESA/Hubble
ESO - M.Kornmesser
ESO - L.Calcada
ESO - Jose Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org)
NAOJ
University of Warwick
Goddard Visualization Studio
Langley Research Center
Pixabay - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Thanks to Keeps for sponsoring this video & for the free product! Head to keeps.com/eventhorizonshow to get a special offer. Individual results may vary.
Ok Wth? The pyramids were NOT & I repeat NOT tombs!!!!! No fucking mummies or burials have been found in pyramids. I thought a man of science would know this & not recite mainstream science hypotheses as fact when it is not. Until a mummy is found in a pyramid or any real evidence then the narrative of pyramids being tombs is solely & purely speculation & thats it. Speculation that evidence found actually goes against that speculation.
Dyson Sphere never made sense to me. But I might be wrong.
It actually more likely that these are dyson spheres than keeps working.
Your guest is behind on the fact world population is already declining and it’s not due to quality of life improvements. This topic should be a show of yours about a great filter being civilizations anti-life cults that end civilization in the name of C’thulhu
This add gives everyone an idea of who the audience is!
I love this channel. I'm not a smart guy by any stretch, but I feel like this channel is a bridge for us regular guys who love looking up at the sky and wondering: what's out there?
Im not a smart man Jenny...
But i know what astroscience is...
Crap.. no one is young enough to get this joke. I expect nothing.
@@poughkeepsieblue run forest... run
@@poughkeepsieblue she tastes like cigarettes
Excellent, now I have something to listen to on the drive home!
move along, its just a shadow of methane gas trapped in weatherballoon shining from the light of venus during eclipse
Almost 1am here in Scotland, currently winding down for the night, I love this show so much :D
Cheers!
Just past 3am now 😁
I’m from Scotland(the west coast) I enjoy the channel very much as well!
@scottishadonis I enjoy it as well 🙂 I'm from the west coast to, Ayrshire.
I am a Yank but at 63 I just learnd I am 30% Scot and even less English than I been told all my life! (DNA test)
Now I think Tabby Star is one under construction.
Happy to hear Ross is getting his Rizz back 😂
Well until evidence shows otherwise, that is a possibility
You're more likely to see an entire galaxy of Dyson swarms than you are one or 2, I think -- because it's highly improbable that you would find yourself living at exactly the right point in time to see the begining of technological civilization's expansion.
If there were an extant tech civ in the galaxy, it should be everywhere -- almost all the stars should be paved over, so to speak. Because it is extremely likely to be at least tens of millions of years older than our civilization, more likely hundreds of millions, which is plenty of time to Dyson swarm all or a large percentage of the galaxy.
Yes. Short term dips are from huge dust clouds because they are mining/ breaking off parts of a planet. Long term dimming is from elements being continually constructed and added to the swarm. This is my head canon.
its an alien sat on the telescope poking a finger into the view for the lols😂
More like it "was" under construction. Until someone else in the Dark Forest spotted its technosignature. Now it's likely a ruin.
Bit surprised and disappointed that you didnt ask him about the "wow-signal" analogue radio signal that was detected from Tabby's Star shortly after the initial light dimming hit the news. I clearly remember hearing about that on the national news, then a day later or so they said "the gyroscope malfunctioned on the telescope so the scientists couldnt continue tracking the signal, we will never know", and then nobody, ever, mentioned anything more about the radio signal again.
Only about the light dimming.. And they specifically mentioned how odd it was to see two unique anomalies from the same star.
It seems as if everyone forgot about that.
I did not think to ask that, but it was actually a laser detection. What happened is that some optical SETI scientists were doing a survey of a ton of targets and they got one positive, which was Tabby's star. So they went back and looked at their equipment to see if there had been some sort of false reading and they concluded it was an errant cosmic ray hit on the detector. But it seemed sort of odd, almost as if they were trying to talk themselves out of it. That's pretty standard in science, knock it out, occam's razor. Radio SETI however has looked more extensively and detected nothing.
Because of you I have learned so much I cannot enjoy videos that are not advanced. Thank you.
As a Dungeons and Dragons player I demand we build a Dyson icosahedron.
Except ther would be the argument on how many sides. And while the 20 sided and 12 sided camps debated it the 4 sided group would convince all other groups to build theirs as proof of concept. In the end everyone loses due to the temporary permanency of the ever present star sized 4-sided die.
Hey guys, let's do a Dyson Sphere. It'll be very big and beautiful and amazing
No, itll be an ugly, sunlight blocking mess. And it will affect the sunlight thats exposed to the crops we rely on to survive. So until we have to rely on artificial light to grow our food, we dont need or want a dyson sphere.
Donald chill
Uuge!!
I'll bring chips!
Where can we find the material needed to even begin a Dyson sphere? The sun is 99 percent of our solar system.... To form a sphere around a star would take more material than what we have in the solar system...
Now I can wait another hour before cutting the grass 🌱! Had to tune in!
Get yourself some cheap earphones, and you can listen and mow at the same time. Which saves time. And time is the only thing you wont get any more of, so overlap your time when you can, so have more in the future.
Youre welcome for the good advice.
I love Jason’s appearances on your podcast. Sometimes these types of conversations turn into a sci fi “what if ALIENS and the pyramids” circle jerk. But you and Jason are great at inserting a healthy dose of skepticism. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll watch any podcast you put out as long as it’s not Avi Loeb whining about academic skepticism.
Please have Jason on again!
Avi is a fine scientist. Get off him
Avi is awesome!!!but all thru history if you speak out you get called names. Think they hung people for saying the earth revolved around d the sun. I believe Avi!!!
REALLY looking forward to this one!
I think a Dyson swarm would be the most probable to build. Less material faster to build
It has to start with a swarm. Then a ring, then two, ..., then a platform, ..., until the sphere is complete.
It could take ten thousand years to build.
the problem is keeping them in place, our satelites end going away or falling to earth, that part is the first problem, the second one is move the energy gathered there to here, so we dont end radiated and burned to death
Encasing whole system makes no sense, even if u can conjure enough material. Unless it’s some crazy scifi god lvl entities that needs all that energy for ‘creating’ wormhole tunnels or something like that. Swarms are more likely…..
As soon as Prof. Wright mentioned that the mystery of Tabby’s star had been put to rest, I just knew John wouldn’t be able to let it go that easily!
Thanks so much john. These podcast always give me much to think about.
Thank you for sharing this very understandable conversation. For us laypeople, many of the podcast discussions are simply beyond our education and current understanding. You two did a great job! 🙂
The most interesting part is how those seven candidates seem to be clustered rather close together instead of being spread out add dramatically reduces the odds of a natural cause it doesn't entirely eliminate it but yeah
Great way to start a, shift tonight. Thanks to you both!
Enjoy!
Thanks John! Amazing interview as always!
“…In the world in which we liiiiiiiiivvvvvvve….”
I end the video just before that because it creeps me out for some reason.
@@themightypen1530 I always hope he goes on for another couple seconds…
Me too!
More like this please John.
cheers John salute from Toronto 🦝
you see Jason Wright…you know it’s gonna be good 👽👽👾👾🛸🛸
This is easily the best science/science fiction channel alongside Issac Aurthur! I've been following your channels for 5 years plus+!
What do you think about the dimming signatures that have been found at F-type stars (apparently) clustered in the vicinity of Boyajian's Star?
Discussed in this episode and will
Be followed up soon.
Great guest. Great conversation.
Finally some videos about potential ETs that cite the science papers. This is excellent! 😲
More to come!
@@EventHorizonShow instantly subscribed! Thanks for taking time to make and share this content!
You might enjoy looking at all of our past videos. Almost all of them are interviews with working scientists.
Another great interview brother!
I am starting to think that stars are not the best energy source. Dyson machines would be everywhere. Maybe we should be looking for odd gravity waves (warp drives) or how to detect vacuum energy.
John looked into it. You’d need the equivalent of something like a million Fusion reactors to match the energy output of the sun.
That's hard to beat
the cost of making a dyson sphere or anything similar is absurd, in terms of materials and time, few would be ready to do one in a galaxy, it is not easy to do the warp drive or the dyson project
both require time and energy, lots of design, development and we are not there yet
Tesla had patents that captured the energy from cosmic rays.
I thoroughly enjoy the content about the search for megastructures - it is perhaps our best bet for eventually finding evidence of advanced life.
Why would megastructures around their sun be our best bet. I always thought that once you reached that kind of technical ability to built them in the first place you are so far ahead that surely other means are more open up and are way more effectiv no?
@@Zaneomc sure - why not? But derelict relics should still exist out there if that is the case, whether the civilization in question is extinct or still in existence. The chances that they would take the time and effort to dismantle such a structure are likely small.
Superb conversation! Oh, so interesting.
Thanks for listening
What if the Dyson swarm is to power a collider for anti-matter production? Build the collider around the star and build a Dyson swarm to power it. Could produce a fair amount of antimatter to power their anti-matter needs.
Why would you need dangerous anti-matter if you had a Dyson swarm though? I suppose to adjust course and come back from a long trip or whatever but for everything else a Dyson swarm is all you would need. Anything else would acquire large amounts of wasted energy over time, even antimatter.
@@seditt5146 anti-matter produces massive amounts of energy from a very small amount. It’s lightweight and can give a vast quantity of energy for space flight. Not to mention other technologies that we don’t know yet. We don’t know what types of energy requirements a mothership would need to traverse large distances. I would assume a massive amount given the size needed. Basically a space carrier that can warp space to transverse the distances in little time.
@@floridaman4073 I think you are right about this, it would be the only way to do journeys to other star systems, and the Dyson swarm is the only likely method to create enough anti-matter. My guess is that a mothership would be made by modifying a small moon, as this would protect the crew with 50 miles of rock and have plenty of interior space to live in, but obviously it will require massive amounts of energy to reach a decent speed.
Some of that energy will be lost. The only reason I see to do something like this is maybe for energy storage. It's like building a coal plant to charge batteries to power your home... the batteries will have less energy than what the coal plant harvested because some energy is lost. Unless it's not an option, it's going to be more efficient to use the energy directly from the star. The more you move the energy around the more you'll lose
@floridaman4073 it takes energy to create the antimatter. And in the process some of that energy is lost. The antimatter we make produces way less energy than it takes us to make us. According to thermodynamics you will never get more energy out than you put in, so the best you're going to do is have the energy change forms, but realistically some energy will always be lost
Fantastic, I need to come back to this one. There's quite a few specific details about star systems I didn't know about and I can only visualize so many in one hour.
I can't find any episodes on podcasts since March. Anyway no biggie great show. Thank you
Great video and information !
I think a dyson belt, is a useful idea, by someone as elon musk, or jeff besos. But an entire sphere would kill us.
A belt wouldnt affect the natural order, and we would still be able to grow what we need to survive, and be a good experiment. But an entire sphere, might kill plant life on earth, and that would be bad if we werent prepared to cultivate better using the energy we could collect.
So, we need to collect efficiently, and provide that energy, more efficiently than we collect it, because we should expect to lose some of the collected energy.
This is a tightrope, that needs to be walked carefully before we commit to.
With the amount of power you could generate I'm pretty sure you could use artificial light to do the job.
Bump for support!!
Particularly terrific guest today I thought!! 😊
Great channel, great science, great life.
Thank you kindly!
Love this blog yayyyyy
Great video!
Interesting how Tabby's Star keeps popping up even though science has "ruled out" several times that anything is abnormal about that star.
These are not the extrateresstrial intlligence youre looking for, move along.
I Thought they figured out that it is a cloud of Gas or dust around it which blocks the light at certain times in a regular pattern? I very much remember hearing about Tabbys star and being very excited only to (as per usual) have science remind me "never assume the answer your in love with is the correct one"
It's not that there isn't anything weird about Tabby's star. We don't know what exactly gives it its light curve. It's probably dust, but how far away the dust is, how it's configured, what makes up the dust, those are questions that still haven't been answered.
There are oroblems with the dust explanation... and it's near (astronomically speaking) others with similar abnormalities
@friendlyone2706 this =/
I really hate it because this is how science works
"team discovers X"
"Team decided they wanna debunk. so they do a study, and either just poke retarded bs holes in methodology of the first team. not actually ruling out first conclusions, but gives plausible reasons why the first papers methodology wasn't fool proof"
media:
"X WAS DEBOONKED!"
Different team does study with diff methodology. Gets same result as first group.
media and academia
"X WUZ DEBOONKED ALREADY!"
being the first to discover something DOESN'T MEAN SHIT!
especially when you can be some petty POS beauracrat pretending to be a scientist, and you can smear someone's work enough to cause even the slightest bit of doubt in it's authenticity. So YOU get the credit, not them, and you can continue to make sure your project continues to get federal funding, and not lost to this new discovery. THIS IS THE REALITY OF SCIENCE/ACADEMIA. THERE IS NO ONE ACTUALLY THERE LOOKING FOR ANSWERS!
I love the idea that those Dyson spheres could simply be similar to our pyramids, offerings to the gods, not made because they need to but because they can and want to haha, cool ideas to ponder at the very least.
The hypothesis of Extravagantly Frivolous Aliens 😂
Alien Michelangelo is out there living his best life
Remarkable interview with Jason Wright! With this many Dyson Sphere/Swarm candidates, one can't help but wonder how many may prove to be exactly that.
Rất cảm ơn Jason Wright vì những thông tin quý giá này!
Good Job, JMG!
I hope you do a show with Dr. Loeb about this soon!!! Would love to hear his input.
Perfect timing, thanks.
Enjoy!
Should really be known as the Stapledon sphere, named after the person who Freeman Dyson got his inspiration for it from.
Fascinating interview! Thanks for the episode! 😁
Jason Wright is rockstar
Yessss!
Is it possible these are being viewed edge on, perhaps through the thickest plane of the remanents which might be an ort cloud, etc?
Wow you said exactly what I feel.
Now I can lay awake all night worrying this channel may turn out to have just been a natural phenomena all the time.
It’s amazing that the search for Dyson spheres found something featuring Jason 😂🎉
TOP TALK!
I like the Przybylski's star theory about the detection being from an unknown Island of stability element decay. It that can be proven it would be huge. Almost as big as aliens doing it :)
Awesome radio.
Telescope capability
I believe the spheres of energy collectors around stars were conceptualised by Olaf Stapledon in his trippy but awe inspiring 1937 book “Star Maker”.
So they really ought to be called “Stapledon Spheres”.
Well, that's an hour of my work night where nothing gets done. Your fault, John. 😁
How are the pyramids a tomb without ever having a Sarcothagus
They have them. All of the famous pyramids at Giza have sarcophagi, and tons of the other lesser famous ones have them. What happened is that some internet content creators thought they could get tons of views lying that they didn't have them on youtube and Tiktok and then parroting and misrepresenting Graham Hancock's ideas. It was all trust me bro, the scientists are lying to us silliness.
Sarcothagus sounds interesting maybe they were literally teleported with the sarcophagus.
Great
One problem with all the searching of “advanced “ civilisation is the point of view we have on it . Looking for radio, for lasers for Dyson spheres and all the things that we can imagine from our tech level perspective. So we are expecting for an advanced civilisation to still use technology that we are using now ???? I can not imagine how this could work . Also speaking about civilisation is even uncertain, we simply don’t know what direction life would evolve into and where does it going to take the energy from and if energy at all … uncertainty over uncertainty. The only thing I can imagine we would find ( with some luck one day) is some remaining left overs from their/ its evolutionary path that are somewhere on our tech level now …
That just means theres a new unknown natural phenomenon or type of star, without the lunacy
it is not lunacy to have a civilization that had time to develop new technologies and no one to kill them over thousands of years to make a dyson sphere that is not made in a week or two
if you think that such idea is lunacy, i dont want to know what you think about a tokamak or other projects trying to make fussion in smaller scale without the sphere, or the sun involved
Moonfall film.
@@federicoclavijo8798 moonfall had some weird ideas, but there is no star inside the moon, a star would emit radiation and we could detect it with or without dyson sphere
I guess Event Horizon really is playing for (Keeps)... Ohh yeah!😂😂😂
Dyson Spheres, the sun screen of the cosmos
No mummies we ever documented in any Egyptian Pyramid.
The internet said that, but it's not true. The Saqqara pyramids had tons of human remains. The pyramid of Teti's wife was excavated in 2021 and had like 40 wooden sarcophagi in it.
There you go!😎🤙🏼🔭
Man, the universe is neat. I am glad to be alive today to see all of this new data coming in from dozens of telescopes.
I been subscribed to event horizon since day one and JMG for years before event horizon,i been here forever.
Captain Montgomery Scott: LADS! GET ME OUTTA THIS SPHERE!
This is like... Well, I would have expected this. Sooner or later. Maybe in 3024 or something.
18:27 You heard it here first, folks, Our Sun is a NERD!
Would it be possible to create a playlist with all episodes? That way i can put it on shuffle for sleeping.
INTERESTING :)
THANK YOU FOR SHARING :)
THANK YOU FROM ISRAEL :)
The Ross man got the goods! He Said “come to the source” 🔥
Jason is such a good dude.
It would be crazy, and sad, if tabby’s star was a necrosignature. As in the dust was a planet.
One small suggestion here. I would suggest that it might be possible for Dyson swarm levels of industrial activity might generate large clouds of dust as industrial waste, similar the the accumulation of material in our own near orbital space. That would make it more difficult tell a techno-signature from a natural phenomenon.
I once read a scifi book about humanity’s first voyage out if our start system. In the story, once they crossed the point where they had left the solar system, everything went black, no more stars or anything to use to navigate. The scientist of the team soon realized that the entire universe had dyson spheres around every star but were projecting the universe into each star system. The dyson spheres were being used as cosmic scale computers to find a way to reverse entropy and prevent the end of the universe
28:00 This is great observation when applied to what aliens might be doing.
Starting now. Good night everyone falling asleep to this.
Maybe the Red Dwarf spacecraft are mining in those systems and generating the dust? I remember watching that Red Dwarf documentary series on TV years ago about that.
The question 'Why' is the difference between understanding and ignorance.
This suggests that asking "why" leads to a deeper understanding of a subject, whereas not questioning leaves one in the dark.
The question 'Why' is the difference between a scientist and a technician.
This highlights that scientists often seek to understand the underlying reasons and principles behind phenomena, while technicians may focus more on applying established methods.
The question 'Why' is the difference between a leader and a manager.
This implies that leaders inspire and motivate by understanding and explaining the purpose behind actions, whereas managers might focus more on execution and processes.
The question 'Why' is the difference between curiosity and compliance.
This indicates that asking "why" is a sign of curiosity and a desire to understand, whereas compliance may involve following instructions without question.
The question 'Why' is the difference between spiritual awakening and spiritual slumber.
This suggests that asking "why" leads to deeper spiritual insights and awakening, whereas not questioning keeps one in a state of unawareness.
The question 'Why' is the difference between faith and blind belief.
This implies that asking "why" strengthens faith through understanding, whereas blind belief is accepting without questioning.
The question 'Why' is the difference between enlightenment and ignorance.
This highlights that seeking the reasons behind existence and experiences can lead to enlightenment, whereas ignorance persists without such questioning.
The question 'Why' is the difference between purpose and routine.
This indicates that understanding the purpose behind actions and life leads to a more meaningful existence, as opposed to simply going through the motions.
...so would you ask 'why' or not?...
Perhaps the wisest question is: 'What helps me?'
A clue here is that a lot of what you discuss is on a continuum or sliding scale. It's not a bipolar, exclusive OR, Black XOR White scenario (NO GREY or color ever). And the reason for a lot of that boils down to culture. And I'm using the word "culture" in the narrow sense of it: this is what the parents of a species teaches to their young to transmit knowledge to the next generation. The problem with that, is that knowledge can change on accelerating curves that hit far faster than the passing of generations in a slow-reproducing species like _Homo Sapiens._ Useful knowledge can become obsolete, and then a historical error, far faster than parents can transmit it to future generations.
But society is often made of old-to-obsolete knowledge, because this exists on a spectrum or sliding scale. The same holds true when it comes to decision-making by societies: It's not just "practical reasons" versus "arbitrary reasons", some decisions of a cultural sort really do fall into the "more rational" versus "less rational" camp. Like The Great Wall of China, which started out as a way to keep invading Mongol Hordes out. But then why was it finished and made into the huge wall it is now? Culture, and the less rational reason of "we did this much, let's get it done."
Shorter version: We as a species that lives in a society, have culture. This by itself makes black-and-white thinking errors besides the point. It's more useful to think on a sliding scale of, for example, "more practical" or "less practical."
a few years back we were asking about the fermi paraox and why we don't see technosignatures. Now we see many potential candidatesSo if the problem is just we haven't looked hard enough, is the Fermi paradox even a paradox?
Honestly? We've hardly HAD radio technology for any relevant length of time, as far as the universe is concerned. And we've most certainly HARDLY taken this task seriously for any relevant length of time, as far as the universe is concerned. We've not really looked for anything for any length of time compared to the lifespan of mere nations, never mind compared to the lifespans of tectonic plates, planets or stars.
So . . . okay, we're not up to our armpits in interstellar neighbors, so we can't completely say "There is no Fermi Paradox." The math and the great silence are what they are, and they don't agree. But . . .
The fact that we keep on finding things that suggest evidence of life and technology so often? That's a prodigal thing, whether it's on our part (being naive, maybe?) or whether it's on the learning curve of figuring out how technological society in general proceeds. I mean, so SO many of our astronomers/SETI people come from such a defeatist, ball-busting subculture of "it's NEVER EVER aliens DAMMIT" that well . . . again, people are still finding things that suggest evidence, so soon and against such resistance that it just seems like we're prodigies at this sort of thing.
But yeah, that can mean we're geniuses, or that we're merely experts at wasting our time, go figure.
Dyson spheres should be trending.
Oh yeah, i loved those BK hot dogs. I completely forgot about them until you guys mentioned it haha
Yeah, that's why I mentioned it. I thought they were the best fast food dogs out there back in the day.
Anyone else notice a pattern?
Scientists set criteria for unambiguous signal for alien life
Scientists detect set criteria
Scientists declare unknown natural phenomenon found
Scientists set new criteria for unambiguous signal for alien life
Repeat
YEP. By this standard of mobile goal-posts, we'd know nothing about the evolution of life on Earth, simply because our old (and occasionally mis-named and outdated) data sets driven by anatomical cladistics were less than perfect. We might could trust the data as far back as the dawn of mammals. And no further--those so-called "dinosaurs" might not even be proper fossil bones. And how dare we call something a "Carboniferous Era" when we weren't actually there and didn't have actual DNA samples?
Yes, I'm being a smartass, but not by very much. There ARE a few paleontologists who are that relentlessly skeptical and constantly have to remind us that "we know NOTHING! NOTHING!" about prior species.
Really, some day soon somebody's going to show up, declare that they're an extra-terrestrial born and raised on Earth by an isolated/secluded family of them, actually have anatomical proof, evidence and everything . . . and science will still do the whole "NOPE, you're just crazy/perhaps a Swiftie maybe" business. :-P
M dwarfs are a great candidate mainly for the long star life.
If it takes a hundred thousand years to travel to a given star and then takes another 20-30 million years to complete a Dyson structure, your going to want that structure to be as long lived as possible.
So if a star is going to last 20 billion years versus 5, which one would you invest your species infrastructure around?
Obviously the dwarf star becomes the best candidate due to being common, long lifed, more efficiently uses material around it as substantialy less matter is needed for a swarm in the goldilocks zone.
We still have a yellow star. That provides all the energy we need.
In the future, when sunlight becomes a problem for growing the essential plants we need to survive here, this information will become very usefull.
Imagine if we could harness ours as it is
@@Hyzer_Sozay only when we are ready to understanding "harvesting" as an advantage over a loss.
And when we can use it as a positive over a negative.
But we have to be absolutly sure, it will be a benifit, to save humanity.
Just sayin.
@@Hyzer_Sozay i imagine it as a horror story. Until it becomes essential to save our planet.
Until then, its sci fi, and should remain speculation until we NEED it.
Hmm, 'cause I'm NOT young!? I feel a sudden urge to read: Pandora's Star(2004) by Peter F H again.
Funny...it's been about 20 years.
I think it's most likely a case of mistaken identity; these "Dyson Spheres" are just some natural phenomenon we don't yet understand and *_not_* multiple examples of super-advanced alien civilizations populating every corner of the galaxy.
Great episode :). Is there a way to know where in the night sky these Dyson Sphere candidates are? Are they all next to each other in a cluster or are they evenly spread? Are they in the plane of the galaxy or not? What constellation are they in? Thanks.
I have fallen into event horizon ☺️☺️😊😚 I love her voice
The problem with building around bigger stars is that they're not using their fuel efficiently. If you're going to build a swarm, you're inherently not thinking on a short or small scale. It's a huge investment of resources and effort.
There is a strong incentive to either lift material off the star to reduce its size and output, or to just start with a small star out of the gate.
Just in time for sleep :D
One potential use for a Dyson Sphere might be to open up a wormhole. If exotic matter does not exist, then it might very well take the entire energy of a star to open up a wormhole.
how do you tell the difference between a DS and just a rocky disk?
Are these still going on Spotify? Seems like the last one there is from march.
The other _other_ reason to build a Dyson Swarm besides real estate & energy is star lifting, mining the star by siphoning up stellar plasma and siphoning useful elements out of it. A star is typically going to have ~90% of the star system's mass, which include a vast majority of the useful metallic elements. You can even use the solar power to mine the minerals, then use the minerals to build your habitat, all from the sun in parallel with a self-bootstrapping Dyson Swarm. A colder star might be preferable for this use case, as it reduces the stress on the mining platforms that have to get close enough to suck up the plasma. Compared to the hassles of terraforming planets, colonizing the stars themselves with Dyson Swarms might be preferable.