China's Nine-Dash Line " NO LEGAL BASIS" and "NO HISTORIC RIGHT"
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
- The Changing dash lines are the basis of China’s claim to sovereignty over 90% of the South China Sea. This claim is based on the U-shaped 11 nine-dash line etched on a map in the 1940s by a Chinese geographer, then 9 dashed lines in 1952, and currently, the 10-dash line in mid-2023.
For long, China has argued that its claim over the South China Sea is historical in nature. Several Chinese analysts and academics contend that the islands of the South China Sea were first discovered by China’s Han dynasty more than two millennia ago.
Accordingly, Chinese missions in the third century A.D. to Cambodia made accounts of the Paracels and Spratlys. Then between the 10th and the 14th century, during the period of Song and Yuan dynasties, Chinese accounts show the South China Sea to be within China’s national boundaries.
Beijing relies on documentary and archeological evidence-indications of Chinese activity in the SCS spanning thousands of years-to support China’s sovereignty claims. At first glance, this proffered evidence may appear to be sufficient proof of China’s claims of sovereignty, especially when China’s sovereignty is assumed, and evidence is sought to support these claims.
However, this historical rights argument has been challenged on several fronts. First, there is insufficient proof that China has controlled the South China Sea after the mid-17th century. Indeed, after a burst of seafaring exploration during the Ming dynasty between 1368 to 1644, China’s emperors largely shut their empire off from the seas, as a consequence, there is scarce cartographic proof of China’s rights over the South China Sea.
Most of the land features and islands within the South China Sea are just microscopic bits of earth with little history behind them and basically no civilians living on them.
In addition, the archeologists who discovered archeological evidence in the SCS are Chinese and in some cases are sponsored by Beijing, potentially biasing them to conclude that the evidence proves China’s ownership of the islands and disregard other potential sources of the evidence such as shipwrecks, temporary stops by Chinese ships, or even planting of the evidence by interested individuals or groups.
In referencing China’s historic claims, Beijing refers to the Chinese people and not to any particular government or country. These statements show that Beijing views China as a cultural group of people, rather than as a particular nation-state or government. With this viewpoint, China looks at the evidence of the activity of Chinese people in the SCS and the evidence of Chinese claims of sovereignty over the SCS as inextricably intertwined.
The fact that the vast area of the South China Sea has been a common fishing ground for centuries not only for the Chinese but also for people living in modern states of the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia. Historical records may not favor China in the continuing debate on the control of the South China Sea, through which as much as $5.3 trillion in global trade passes annually.
To further disprove China’s claim of historical rights, several ancient Chinese maps, dating as far back as 900 years ago, to the Song and Tang dynasties. All the maps showed that China’s southernmost territory was the island of Hainan. Additionally, the 1947 Constitution of the Republic of China, also identified Hainan as the country’s southernmost part, raising questions over what would later emerge as the nine-dash line claim.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @aseananalytics
Regardless what China Claims, west Philippines will always be part of Philippines exclusive economic zone. No lies and intimidation can changes that FACTS
There is no West Philippine Sea you cannot see it on any maps however, there is a South China Sea on all world maps.
And there is no 9 dash line on any world map. It is a narrative created by the CCP. The 9 or 11 dash line came about after world war 2 because the Koumintong party new the importance of that strategic body of water.The name South China Sea came about because Portuguese sailors referred to it as such and became known as that. The name west Philippine sea is only referred to the body of water that is 200nm off Philippine coast. China employs the same tactics in invading and controlling territories as they have in the mainland neighbours by occupying an area then move more people in followed by military then start calling it yours. China didn’t manage to expand it’s territories by being kind to their neighbours
@Xyruuz West Philippine Sea is part of the South China Sea that is within the EEZ of the Philippines. The Philippines does not claim the whole of the South China Sea unlike China.
@@Xyruuzno country recognized your so called 9 or 11 dash line,only greedist and lier panda😅 off all nation😅
In Vietnam they refer south China sea eez as Biển Đông that means east Vietnam sea. even Asian neighbors can rename their exclusively territorial seas. It's obvious that china is not the real owner of so called South China sea your neighbors have also rightful claims to their own exclusive territory & that's a fact!👍
Truly, "9 dash line" a claim without legal basis, end of all arguments.
China ate lying lying and lies claim...no nation believed it
Regardless of any argument to the contrary, the undeniable fact is that the Philippines Archipelago, including the contested areas, was once under the Spanish rule and never under any Chinese dynasty, sold to US under the Treaty of Paris and the Treaty of Washington. Such that China's claim of ......dash line lacks historical, fact and legal basis.
Kaya ayaw ng China na pag-usapan ang nasabing problemac sa UN dahil sa alam nito na ang .......dashline claim nila ay walang legal and factual basis.k
UNCLOS LAW ENDS ALL CHINESE ILLEGAL CLAIMS INCLUDES NINE DASH LINE AND HISTORIC CLAIMS
Exactly no basis, totally invalid claims. Even too far from their mainland clearly. Shame on them for being greedy.
Falklands??
美国关岛离美国本土距离太远了，为他们的贪婪感到羞耻，毫无法理依据
@@JeanAriesM 慷他人之慨，要求我们分享土地，那我也要求你们分享新墨西哥州、毕竟你们更加富有，为什么不把地分给贫苦的墨西哥人呢？
@@GideonOfnir-je2fq 🤣🤣🤣🤣CHINA IS A BARBARIC NATION.
@@GideonOfnir-je2fq at first, China offered Philippines a free survey of its surrounding seas. The Philippines agreed, then China's survey discovered vast oil and gas reserves in the Philippines side of the South China Sea . China then immediately came up with its 9 dash line claim of those areas by reasons of historical rights. Due to that, the Philippines filed a case with UN Arbitral Court. China REFUSED to participate the hearings. The Philippines won the case.. China again REFUSED to honor and follow the verdict of the UN International Court saying it's null and void. This shows China as an irresponsible member of international community, and worse being one of the world's super power.🤔🙄
Philippines government need to bring it up again in INTERNATIONAL COURT..too make it clear about Chinese unprofessional actions.
West Phillippine sea🇵🇭 freedom of navigation is free to all nation not only China.
that 9 dash line came from chinas hallucinations.
The Philippines should file CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES & LOST INCOME OF FILIPINO FISHERFOLKS to the UN Court. Then the Award of Damages can be taken from Chinese Banks in the Phils. and / or other friendly countries.
or just imprison xi jinpig and his cronies since they stolen from their own banks
Let the bounty of the earth be shared to any country entitled to it. The UNCLOS of 1982 - the maritime laws of the oceans and seas must always prevail and be complied with in good faith. It is clearly defined by the Arbitral Ruling wherein it was followed and observed by the coastal States around the world delineating their maritime boundaries except china - a supposed rich country and member of the UN does'nt want to abide by the ruling because of its own historical with no legal basis and rejected by the Arbitral Tribunal. Hence, peace can't hardly be achieved if this situation will persist. Let us have peace, and peace will give us world economic prosperity.
China's next claim... "The moon is drawn on 'historical' maps, therefore the moon is Chinese territory today."
The Vietnamese atleast should thanks the Philippines for clearing things out regarding the China's 9 or 10 or how many dashes they want. Vietnam should act to assert their Paracel claim.
But Vietnamese and china are friends,😅😅they even have elligal clinics in the Philippines,most of the pogo workers from Vietnam and china
@@Dj85619 I know about that news one Vietnamese doctor cannot represent the whole of Vietnam.
@@greatzaliv993 not only one
@@Dj85619 If you are alarm with that try to watch biased Filipinos giving testimonies in the CGTN "The Point".
@@greatzaliv993 well you don't have to say what to do,we have different beliefs
china is hiding the fact that before china became china.... the tatooed indigenous YUe people and the Nanman people that lived south of yangtze (southern china) are austronesians. The territory are part of the ancestral domain of austronesians... So territories south of yangtze, the sea, taiwan, philippines, vietnam, malaysia, indonesia, etc are part of the Austronesian Hegemony
Trading does not meant you have the rights to claim territories of other countries.
yup,so stupid and greedy!
according to china, might is right... they said "we are big and you are small so we are always right"
China's map will neve stop to 9 and10 dash line ,If given the chance, they will continue to extend the line up to 100 dashline from WEST side crossing to the EAST side Pacific down to the SOUTHERN part until there is nothing left to the country💪🤣🇵🇭
World is enough for mans need,not enough for a mans greed....god give us space for our needs..to respect other...
Its a fake map...no historical basis
U are the fajes pipols around the 🌎 jlobes u drago n bols xis
LOL, if no historical basis why China didn't have victory decision from tribunal? 😂
China should research more about the Philippines history.. Check put the 3TREATIES that governed the Philippines territory. We have all the documents and original map of the Philippines.
9 dash line have no historical bases... west Philippines have historical and legal bases.. 1898 treaty of Paris, 1900 treaty of washington, treaty of British.. plus unclos arbitral ruling.. what china evident of historical right? 2016 imaginary 9 dash line...
@@leonortenorio6604 😁😁😁 a communist style
@@JeanAriesM hahaha.. greediness and jealousy. china, Russia, Iran they are dreaming to defeat American influence.. and to dominance the whole world... Iran attacked Israel to dominance the middle east, the islamic world. Russia invaded Ukraine to capture to EU, china to south china sea to control the world trade, Asean and east Asia.. they are crazy... they underestimated American leaderships and capabilities.. china thought they have the control supply chain and have advance technology.. Iran and Russian they have oil and gas and military weapon with advance technology... they never thought america have more than enough oil and gas reserved... 75% of top 2000 billionaire are American.. they are world economic investors...new York financial capitalist finance brics bank capital.. they are American investors
NONE dash Line
they are not even Han dynasty, and china refused to unite until king sheng unite them with military force. however there was no historical evidence in my history books about that 9 to 11 dash lines
Its none dash line...they cant invent map...its under unclos
#nonedashline
😂😂😂😂
No historic rights. Baseless
Yes, but China maintains it has ' indisputable sovereign right ' over SCS and WPS meaning it's beyond argument and reason to extinguish its claim and therefore the only solution left is the language of FORCE.
History can’t be erased. Come on get it if you dare.
How can China claim undisputable sovereignty in the SCS when history proves that China ceded HONGKONG under the British Empire in 1842,,,
Therefore since 1842 their sovereignty claims have already been disputed by colonial powers of the 18th century.
😂😂😂
Any explanation why dash lines were used and not just one continuous line? Are the spaces between the dashes owned by the nearest country?😅
中国是对虚线以内的所有的岛礁拥有主权，可没说对虚线以内的整片海域拥有主权
China's action everywhere in the world has no legal basis likewise!
because they have a crazy xi
Crazy basis
Song and Tang Dynasties of China was only applicable by the CCP on land territories within China,Mongolia,Tibet, Bhutan and all trading neighbors of China
We already know that.
No legal basis
Just stay within your EEZ😮
theres really non...
the reason is "expansion" by means of
sea grabbing....
Swapang talaga mga Intsik na ito. Hayan nakasaad na diyan sa mga Sinaunang Mapa.
What really happen to man how one country could own waters close to another
想知道为什么吗？我告诉你，因为画出十一段线的时候周边还没有国家，没有任何国家对十一段线提出异议，当时的国际主流国家都承认了有十一段线这回事
@@ticheng4814 you cannot reclaim something that was not awarded to your country after japan invasions in world war 2. That's why 9 dash lines was invalid even before.
@@Stellarlaurens你要知道，中国是战胜国，如果你要强调授予，那我告诉你早在一千多年前中国就已经对南海岛屿实施有效的管辖，如果中国没有资格拥有南海岛屿主权，难么别的国家更没有资格拥有岛屿主权，你可以看看维基百科，里面有详细介绍自古以来的南海归属问题
@@Stellarlaurens你看到的和现实问题是有冲突的，美国可以拥有离本土上万公里之外的关岛作为领土都合理合法，中国就不能拥有家门口的主权吗？你说的话没有道理
@@ticheng4814 oh, what a waste of time for me to read your comment it's another historical claim of china with no such thing as evidence.. china is one of the earliest civilizations. So advanced that they forgot to draw their own map and very busy finding their own.
I agree china has no right, just to say I want all the sea, and thinks he should get. The international has agree, china has no right to it
There was no Historic rights in the sea. But there was a fishing ground by all human being. Historic rights applicable only to island and not on fake island or artificial island
Piliin Ang Pilipinas, 🤍❤️🧡💚
Choose Philippines 🤍❤️🧡💚
Before it is 9 dash Line now it's 10 dash Line?
Whats next? 100 dash Line including the whole Pacific ocean? its possible to happen due to their greediness.
9 dash dreams🤣
Territorial ownership is not based on basis, but on the range of artillery
ophir was there long before the chinese
Make it 100 dash line, eat more bat soup.
and spread more plagues ?
China told the UN Arbitral Court it will not participate in court proceedings tho recognizes 3 treaties: paris,Washington & Britain's related to Sabah.Notably Washington treaty affirms Spratly Islands & Scarburough shoal are part of the Phils ceded by Spain to US in this treaty.
China illigaly squating in Philippine EEZ
Scrached Plan drawing made by China.True , legal bounderies of nation cannot be desolved ,remain. China desire more expansion in Alaska and the Pacific Ocean,too.
Asean anslytic, do you have Q1 actual gdp growth in asean.tnks in advance.
Paracel island is of France...... It's time for France to take it back.......❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
That map of china as what I have seen on television dated 1945 or 1946 something was the issuance nor the map was published is around ww2 something which is kind of a map on rush to published just to claim land...
NO 9 DASH LINE. ITS OKAY BUT NO UNCLOS TO AND HAGUE ARBITRARY FAIR
Lutong Macau. (Cooked in China)
««»»🇧🇩🤝🏻🇨🇳Bangladesh"Phool" support"China....
What CCP bribe was given to govt officials? RMB or USD?
Support China 🇨🇳 from Malaysia 🇲🇾
@@liesterminator153 Birds of the same feather, flock together.
China for your clearer picture just take a look and respect the International Law (UNCLOS) which China is also a signatory, you violated the international law by your greedy and hegemonic ambition.
In other wirds, gawagawang self-serving claims para mka-angkin ng hindi sakanila!! Pwee
Nobody should not recognize nine dash line, not valid PCG always be present in the SCS/WPS for the fisher folks safety
Look CHINESE government, your country is very far from Philippines!!! Tsktsktsk 😡😡😡
9 dash line was drawn by xijinping toddler grandson and everyone in china believed it
Hmmm 🤔, china for me is a bicycle! when I was in elementary,, was 1982,, we had bicycles, somewhat I can't buy for parts to fix my bike, there are establishments, they speak Chinese, Filipinos were d crew, I was grade 4,, there were Chinese,, friendly people but my lolo said,,! where we get money to buy parts?! that starts business,, Then they were many ! friendly but not people that are submersive! then they were many,, cross married 😅!! to Filipinos, until then! but they are now communist which WE don't like!!!
How about spanish time map
Isaiah 54:17 says
No weapon that is fashioned against you will succeed, and you can refute every tongue that rises against you in judgment. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord and their vindications from me , says the Lord Almighty.
I believe, I claim it in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
The Lord is our Shield and Mighty Fortress who can be against us?
We received it already by faith
China will soon claim that the whole world is their own😂 11 dash line coming soon😂
How?😂😂😂😂 they will say China around the Globe 😂😂😂😂😂
9dash lies
In their dreams 9 dash line 😂😂😂 there is no such thing what clearly shows are they just are greedy
The LORD will utterly destroy the Tongue of the Sea..... Isaiah 11:15
You should be thankful that China claimed only 9 dash line instead of their original claimed of 11 dash line!
Excuse me can someone answer me what will happened if the Philippines joins nato? Will the tention in the west philippine sea will arise into chaos by beijing aggression?
South east asia nations should rename the south china sea as Asia Southeast Sea or Southeast Asia Sea. China is illegally expanding its territory just like what they did in Nepal, Tibet and boarder conflict with India
Maybe or rather a fruit of imagination,
Greed nine dish by China.
Indian ocean has been sailed by ships since start of maritime history.doesnt mean india has sovereign right to it.
中国也没有主张对整片海域拥有主权，主张的是对虚线以内的所有岛礁拥有主权
did he bought those tiny islands?sinced china have so much nerve to own them?
18 centuries lol
What a joke this claims 😅😊
Nine dash line is actually None dash line, it's a bogus and greedy map.
History claim.😂😂😂😂😂what the fact.😂😂😂😂
You have only one person to teach and let him understand and respect about this Law of the Seas, the Leader of every country. If every leader has a mindset like this...this planet has an everlasting peace from generation to generation.
If only passage ang every country can fished freely thers nothing wrong.the problem china tought they can d what they like on the sea which is notbtheir own .that that yhe pilipinos can do what they like in their own territory.many said a small country Phil is arich country and noone can fenid it.why not china let thepinoys do what they like .let us enjoy the gift of God for the people.the sea is not owned by only one country.stop bullying pinoy let them free.phil don't want war.chinese geediness made the pinoys amed .how long.be a kind to one another since phil is only small and china is ahuge country .be a friend and live peacefully thank to alp allies who simphaty to the phil.Gid bless us all.
Exactly mo basic of china
nine dash line is chinesw historical territory, you have to fight us to take it away
its ASEAN fault theres no unity in this region ...if some asean country is not affected they will not support their brother asean instead they supported china for 11dashline like Burma, Cambodia, Laos what kind of group is this ...?
What is the basis of China in their sovereignty claims on the West Philippine Sea?
China has no claims in the West Philippine Sea:
The western edge of the Philippine Sea is the archipelago of the Philippines.
China does have, on the other hand, legitimate claims on the South China Sea that date back all the way to 1946, and were created by the Republic of #China (the internationally recognized government of all of China at the time), along with the assistance of the US navy.
Oh, and while we’re at it, I think that I should remind you that at the time that the #US was assisting the #ROC in officially laying claims, the Philippines was still under US control. They explicitly told the #Philippines that, according to the Treaty of Paris (1898), the islands of the #SouthChinaSea were not a part of the Philippines.
The very sad thing is that even The Republic of China 1947 constitution indicates that Hainan Island was its Southernmost Territory, China can change its story, make evidence but real history exposed China's lies.
Is it? There's Treaty of Washington that include those features outside the reference line of the Treaty of Paris.
You have to research more without impartiality.
You are not aligned with China's claim. China said they have historical claim based on some dynasty.
@@greatzaliv993 they have historical claims but the problem is how can they prove it😂 evidence an authentic one not a fabricated 😂
@@flamingknight5130 That's the big problem
So what! We are powerful in terms of econmy and military so we can do and get what ever we want!!
Pnoises pretending to be victims as usual.
The dash line didn't matter. The islans and shoal lie outside the legal maritime boundary of the Philippines.
That is not true. According to international law, China has no claims in the West Philippine Sea or in the international waters of the South China Sea. In other words, China has no business building naval presence or artificial islands in the Spratleys, Scarborough shoal, and the international waters of the Soth China Sea. That is the reason why many countries and their navies are backing up the Philippines in the South China Sea, while no one is backing up China in its illegal behavior in that region.
"The History and Sovereignty of South China Sea", a book written by Anthony Carty, has provided academic proof that 'the rule of law says that the islands are Chinese'.
I don’t think there’s a last name called Carty. It looks like the author of the book is the CCP.
The International Court of Arbitration in the Hague ruled that China's current and unilateral assertions in the South China Sea are not valid, according to existing international law of the sea. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), not Anthony Carty or whoever, is the highest authority when it comes to international maritime law.
@@c0smicbyte , there’s no such name as Carty except those made up by the CCP.
@@c0smicbyte
Territorial claims are not governed by UNCLOS.
@@c0smicbyte The International Court of Arbitration helps to resolve international commercial and investment disputes and does not issue formal judgements.
This channel is not neutral. F it.
Chinese greed
the philippine map of the past is a real historical fact... not an imagination like that of China..
The Philippines once occupied the Great Wall of China. That's part of our 15 dash line. China doesn't have any sovereignty over Great Wall. Lapu Lapu once sailed in that area thousands of years ago.....😆
I do wish you would stop calling the West Philippine Sea the South China Sea 🇺🇸💖🇵🇭
🇺🇸💖🇵🇭
China Leader have 9 dash line in here dreams😜
Trung Quốc ko có chủ quyền ở trường sa va hoàng sa chủ quyền vn 🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳
No china - vietnam money
New Asean Sea
Long live Vietnam and the Philippines! Maybe China doesn't want anymore to buy Vietnamese oil and gas. Maybe China thinks it is cheaper to just steal Vietnamese EEZ and steal the oil in Vietnamese EEZ for China. The same with oil deposits in EEZs of Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, and the Philippines. China wants to steal them from the countries who own those oil deposits, instead of buying oil from those countries. China, how about this: make TRADE, not war.
China is dreaming big pour country before they want to go back pou if they create war😂😂😂
China wants to fight with the United States, the Philippines should not approach. China and the United States are both superpowers and they will not fight. The Philippines is the one who is injured
The South China sea.
No historic claim whatsoever got it.
It's not like the Sea is called after the nation claiming it to be their waterways.
These people dude ☺️😅
Chuckles a little
Just horrible.
Vietnam and Phillipines could make a legal claim to get shared water rights of course since anrainer.
But that's pretty much it. The legalities are not clear cut as one might think but to state there wouldn't be a claim of them while stating the name of the sea is beyond batshit.
One would need to be an utter moron to believe such a sentence.
Look it's called the South China sea but they have no claim to it.
Really?
How would that square up?