increasing the fire power and mobility of t72 is a smart tactic by russia and it will save cost ............. but the main problem of weak ammo racks is still not solve ................... by the way good video :)
The t90m have dry ammunition storage like in the nato tanks that in case of amorack the fire will go autside of the tank by one huch that is desing for that like in nato tanks
From the price performance perspektive is this tank excellent solution. Maybe 10 most modern tank would beat 15 of such tanks in direct fight, but this tank cost 1/4 of their price.
T72B3M need more Armour, like T72B1MS in the front 200mm Armour. And like Ukraine 2 layres Duplet and 2 leyers nozdh. And the same digital packet like T72B1MS and 1000hp New gun and new ammo. Catherine xp optoelektronik sensors and sosna u. And slat armour in the back and 840hp engine and passive defence and 12.7mm remote control station
They can't afford mass-production of the T14 and now especially due to sanctions, there two largest tank factories were forced to shut down. Invading Ukraine has severely weakened the Russian military and has shown the world that their effectiveness is vastly overrated.
I'd also like to add that many Russian modernization programs have been announced and touted, yet in the actual war, they're either not fielded or don't work. Where's the touted hard kill active protection system on their tanks? They're supposed to have had the first or one of the first hard kill defensive tank systems mass-produced.
@@user_____M not new tech ? It has hard kill "arena" aps and a secure ammo rack and new canon (same as the t14). And the t90 is from 90'. Only the t72b3 and the t80bvm are modernized tanks
Because they found that the only time a remote weapon station was ever really used was in urban areas. Just an unnecessary cost for a nation that expects to fight a war in the plains of Eastern Europe against a peer adversary.
I think T-72AV (Syrian version) is Stronger than I think, they can destroy M1A2 Abrams in guerillas battle. US Propoganda are shit, they can't beat Russian tanks then do a digital propoganda to all country in the world. Because they're coward can't battle face to face and they're only professional on Hollywood movies😂, Reason why Russia have better ground forces? Because they always do Tank biathlon every year.
@@theforgottenhistorytfh601 it’s all about who shoots first now tbh, and america has the better tank, Russian tanks tend to be cheaper and less protects, the only upper hand they have is being so small, ATGMs and a bigger gun
@@alucardtherealvampire6470 less protects?😂 Are you sure? Why in Syria war M1A2 Abrams destroyed by Kornet ATGM but T-90A crew survived after hitted by BGM-71 TOW?😂 Think again fool
@@alucardtherealvampire6470 Less Price doesn't mean weak,why all Russian tanks are cheaper than US? Because Russia have more resources than US and yeah, Russia economic is still in stagnation that make all are cheap. Did you ever hear that Indian Mig-21 destroy Pakistan modern F-16? And did you ever hear about T-90 & T-72 destroy M1A2 Abrams in Syria? I think NO right? You're already brainwashed by Capitalist US
***FACT: At ranges greater than 1500 meters, the T72/ T90 cannon fire is ineffective against the Abrams frontal armor.*** ***At the same distance, the Abrams can turn the T-72/T-90 into an instantaneous 3 person crematorium. ***
even more fun facts t72 and t-90 can turn abrams into 4-man crematorium from range of 4000 meters. And why someone will fire at little abrams frontal armor anyway if 70% of Abrams so badly armored? some abrams get destroyed even from heavy machinegun.
So ein Unsinn. Das Relikt reduziert um 50 Prozent. Da bleiben max. 400 mm bei APFSDS. Das reicht also von vorn nicht ! Die 2A46m5 Kanone verwandelt auch den Abrams in ein Schrotthaufen. Nicht von vorn, aber ausserhalb der Hauptpanzerung 120 Grad. Das APFSDS hat ebenso 850+ mm Durchdringung. Außerdem ist der Abrams schon bei 4000 m+ kaputt. 😆
@@LivingMyBestLife956 the main protection from a tank, is in the front. In the side ,the rear, on the top is possible destroyd a tank. A APFSDS munition from T 72 B3M can also destroyd a Abrams. Special the canon missle with a range from 4000+ meter In the front the T 72b3m used the system Relikt. This reduce the Penetration deep 50 percent, from 850 mm penetration Abrams muntion. 425 mm is not a problem from the turret and frontT 72b3m.😆
@@zirkon-jq8tn M829A4 is designed specifically to defeat the latest armor package on the T72/T90. It's a constant game of one-upmanship. That is until development on the 120mm Electro-Thermo Chemical Cannon is completed. A du projectile traveling at 2500 m/s is definitely a game changer.
This modification of the t72 will give Russia the possibility to keep selling a lot of them and earn a lot of money
Lol
More making services money on an existing platform but also make the best use of their inventories.
increasing the fire power and mobility of t72 is a smart tactic by russia and it will save cost ............. but the main problem of weak ammo racks is still not solve ................... by the way good video :)
the solution is to install the APS arena
Yeah, the t72 is still a very capable platform. Look at the centurion and m60 series, those tanks served for decades with proper modernization
The t90m have dry ammunition storage like in the nato tanks that in case of amorack the fire will go autside of the tank by one huch that is desing for that like in nato tanks
@@cherrypoptart2001 centurion is still serving in South Africa
From the price performance perspektive is this tank excellent solution. Maybe 10 most modern tank would beat 15 of such tanks in direct fight, but this tank cost 1/4 of their price.
Yes, and they have enougth.
Lol
@@zirkon-jq8tn aged really well, like smelly cheese left out in the summer Sun.
T72B3M need more Armour, like T72B1MS in the front 200mm Armour. And like Ukraine 2 layres Duplet and 2 leyers nozdh.
And the same digital packet like T72B1MS and 1000hp New gun and new ammo.
Catherine xp optoelektronik sensors and sosna u. And slat armour in the back and 840hp engine and passive defence and 12.7mm remote control station
this is not call of duty
Nice video keep up the good videos.
Looking back at the gulf war... A bitter memory
2:45 uncorrect information
On t-72 machine gun right from gun, but not left from gun
is T-72B3M have 4s23 plates?
Yes. Usually does.
@@chriswoods507 in front?
@@comrade607 No. They usually have fit the 4S23 to the tanks sides in the skirts. And 4S24 to the turret side/rear area.
@@comrade607 Frontal armor is still comprised of Kontakt-5, but I expect that will change in the coming couple of years.
@@chriswoods507 i think T-72b3m have 4s23 plates in kontakt 5 armor in front (kontakt 5 armor can use 4s23 plates)
Javelin and NLAW have seen them 😎
T90m's aps will destroy those missiles
@@suntzu3956 Not all t-90m's have been fitted with arena.
Inaccurate comment the javelin only killed a couple of tanks and a ton of apc's so...
The should put Arena e on 30 or 40 tank
Russia should retire all their cold war era tanks, and just stick with T14 Armata and T90m
They can't afford mass-production of the T14 and now especially due to sanctions, there two largest tank factories were forced to shut down. Invading Ukraine has severely weakened the Russian military and has shown the world that their effectiveness is vastly overrated.
T90M is a Cold War era tank, it doesn't have new tech, just better upgrades.
I'd also like to add that many Russian modernization programs have been announced and touted, yet in the actual war, they're either not fielded or don't work. Where's the touted hard kill active protection system on their tanks? They're supposed to have had the first or one of the first hard kill defensive tank systems mass-produced.
@@user_____M not new tech ? It has hard kill "arena" aps and a secure ammo rack and new canon (same as the t14). And the t90 is from 90'. Only the t72b3 and the t80bvm are modernized tanks
@@suntzu3956 none of those are new and t90 is just modernisation of t72
Do Challenger 2 Megatron video!
manual machine gun? Why?
Because they found that the only time a remote weapon station was ever really used was in urban areas. Just an unnecessary cost for a nation that expects to fight a war in the plains of Eastern Europe against a peer adversary.
would you pay the price of a T90MS for a T72B3m? stupid question
hell no, the t90 is like the m1a2 sep v4 being called the same thing as the m1a1
Here to prove a argument the T-90A is not the T-72B3M and is instead the T-72BU
I think T-72AV (Syrian version) is Stronger than I think, they can destroy M1A2 Abrams in guerillas battle. US Propoganda are shit, they can't beat Russian tanks then do a digital propoganda to all country in the world. Because they're coward can't battle face to face and they're only professional on Hollywood movies😂, Reason why Russia have better ground forces? Because they always do Tank biathlon every year.
The t90m is a cheaper t14
The t72 can't compete with the t90m
@@theforgottenhistorytfh601 it’s all about who shoots first now tbh, and america has the better tank, Russian tanks tend to be cheaper and less protects, the only upper hand they have is being so small, ATGMs and a bigger gun
@@alucardtherealvampire6470 less protects?😂 Are you sure? Why in Syria war M1A2 Abrams destroyed by Kornet ATGM but T-90A crew survived after hitted by BGM-71 TOW?😂 Think again fool
@@alucardtherealvampire6470 Less Price doesn't mean weak,why all Russian tanks are cheaper than US? Because Russia have more resources than US and yeah, Russia economic is still in stagnation that make all are cheap. Did you ever hear that Indian Mig-21 destroy Pakistan modern F-16? And did you ever hear about T-90 & T-72 destroy M1A2 Abrams in Syria? I think NO right? You're already brainwashed by Capitalist US
Что-то ничего я толком-то и не понял.
Есть ещё версии китайских поделок!!!!
I bet all these poor tankdriverguys are already dead...
Watching this now after the Ukraine Army just took some Abandoned T-72B3M because it ran out of fuel :')
**** Ни один из этих российских ПТУР не пробьет лобовую броню «Абрамса». **** th-cam.com/video/s13qnIAq-DE/w-d-xo.html
а зачем быть в лобовую броню, если даже на лицевой стороне вся центральная зона - слабое место?
А с боков там с старые рпг пробивают.
The t-72 is junk compared to the t-90ms
xaxa... Clown.
@@bittemeinrammstein every russian tank is junk TBH
@@Slycarlo Says the person what dont know shit about them. )
Sly Carl you dont know anything about Russian tanks
T80m
Judulnya pake bahasa Indonesia, tapi komentator nya bahasa asing
Kan di translate dri inggris ke indo khusus yg berada di indo
***FACT: At ranges greater than 1500 meters, the T72/ T90 cannon fire is ineffective against the Abrams frontal armor.***
***At the same distance, the Abrams can turn the T-72/T-90 into an instantaneous 3 person crematorium. ***
even more fun facts t72 and t-90 can turn abrams into 4-man crematorium from range of 4000 meters.
And why someone will fire at little abrams frontal armor anyway if 70% of Abrams so badly armored?
some abrams get destroyed even from heavy machinegun.
So ein Unsinn. Das Relikt reduziert um 50 Prozent. Da bleiben max. 400 mm bei APFSDS. Das reicht also von vorn nicht ! Die 2A46m5 Kanone verwandelt auch den Abrams in ein Schrotthaufen. Nicht von vorn, aber ausserhalb der Hauptpanzerung 120 Grad. Das APFSDS hat ebenso 850+ mm Durchdringung. Außerdem ist der Abrams schon bei 4000 m+ kaputt. 😆
@@zirkon-jq8tn I haven't lived in Germany for 40 years, please consider an English translation.
@@LivingMyBestLife956 the main protection from a tank, is in the front. In the side ,the rear, on the top is possible destroyd a tank.
A APFSDS munition from T 72 B3M can also destroyd a Abrams. Special the canon missle with a range from 4000+ meter
In the front the T 72b3m used the system Relikt. This reduce the Penetration deep 50 percent, from 850 mm penetration Abrams muntion.
425 mm is not a problem from the turret and frontT 72b3m.😆
@@zirkon-jq8tn M829A4 is designed specifically to defeat the latest armor package on the T72/T90. It's a constant game of one-upmanship.
That is until development on the 120mm Electro-Thermo Chemical Cannon is completed. A du projectile traveling at 2500 m/s is definitely a game changer.
All u said is lie .. russian tank is sitting ducks now in Ukraine 😂😂😂
Keep drinking the Kool aid brother
Yes it sucks just as much as the T90
Shout out to the Russians who don't get mad when someone talks shit about there tanks
You'll probably get angry when someone talks shit about yours..
@@Creppystories123 Why would I care? Tanks don't pay my bills
@@josephkool8411 Jk
@@Creppystories123 Russian tanks are dogshit, all their tanks will get destroyed by a hidden F35 and Javelins that ukraine is using.
@@aimxdy8680 No one greeted the Clown a years later?
But sitting duck in Ukraine 😂😂😂😂