@@orkako Well they have decent tanks not the best but they get the job done, the problem is they seem to not know how to use them properly thats why they are having big losses in ukraine not much because of the tanks being bad. Look at ukraine they use almost the same tanks but use them properly.
@@scothf1273 they know how to use a tank the problem is modern Anti tank weapons. many Ukraine tank was destroyed too some of it from tank vs tank battle, some of ukraine tank is old T-64B and maybe some taken T-72 or T-80 and they only have little number of it
@@scothf1273it’s not so much that Their tanks are 100% usable But it’s all designs from the 60’s and 70’s No one has a “modern” tank There hasn’t really been a full redesign in a while, but Russia goes further, they have only moderately improved from the T-72A The M1 is dramatically worse then the M1A2 And the Sep packages have completely changed the armor, improved the shot accuracy and the ammunition has improved drastically as well The T-90MS is to the T-72A What the M1A2 Tusk is to the M1 When it should be what the M1A2 SEPv3 is to the M60TTS But it’s just not T-14 was a chance But Russia just doesn’t have the capacity to make these massive improvements anymore It costs too much and takes too long
T-14 wont be a true Russian tank without the mytical wooden log
3 ปีที่แล้ว +22
That's the gun depression. When they need it they deploy it (means drop behind the tank) then they reverse upon it and this way they have gun depression :) Stalinwood is life comrade!
@@Kalashnikov413 More exactly it's an iconic and classic joke. And as you see no one has a sense of humor because everyone is a triggered snowflake nowadays!
T-90M has the same engine as T-90MS. Even new T-72B3M has the V92S2F now. T-90M also has an upgraded autoloader that can use longer APFSDS projectiles. T-90MS doesn't.
Ya this is confusing me. Most sources are stating only 1000hp for t90m but this makes little sense to me as I don’t see how/why the export version of a tank could/should have a better engine than that of the native/indigenous version. You’d think the Russian army would be using the better variant of their own vehicle
@@sumrandumguy7177 I mean if you think about it; its cheaper to switch the engine out with the new one when upgrading and there isn't a huge performance gap between the two variants so you can upgrade your current T-90 arsenal with up-to-date technology without breaking the bank which russia is obviously trying to do. Though from what I heard; its mixed sources meaning they may use the export engine whilst others say it will not.
1) There's two T-90MSs. T-90MS mod. 2011 was the new export T-90 version replacing T-90SA featuring Relikt ERA, Sosna-U, CITV, new 1130hp V-92S2F engine, satelite navigation, air conditioning, "Kalina" FCS, automatic transmission and wheel steering, remote machine gun station with 7.62 PKT MG, ERA sideskirts and the 2A46M-5 gun with new autoloader that is able to fire Svinets APFSDS. It was already deployed on T-90A, but T-90S lacked it. Uralvagonzavod also offered this package to Russian military as T-90AM (not to be confused with T-90M) but they didnt order any as they were presumably waiting for Armata to start production soon enough. 2) T-90M Proryv-3 is the latest variant that Russian military now ordered, it has all the T-90MS mod. 2011 improvements plus some tech derived from Armata: new turret with Kord-MT 12.7mm MG (all T-90s that are domestically ordered come with 12.7mm MGs), safe ammo rack, partial Afganit APS, aramid lining, upgraded fire control system with networking functionality and 2A82-1M gun - same barrel is used on Armata but autoloader size is unchanged, so it's unable to fire new Vacuum APFSDS, but has better bore life and accuracy. 3) The new T-90MS is an export version of T-90M. The differences are 7.62mm PKT MG instead of Kord, optional Arena-E APS instead of Afganit and the gun is still 2A46M-5.
T-90 has always been an impressive MBT. And a very practical, logical weapons system program. Cheaper than the T-80 and more reliable. Glad (if I was Russian) to see the T-80s are being re-engined amongst other upgrades and returned to the active duty force.
I hope they won't, the T-80 is basically the heavily modernized T-64. Also is a turbine engine absolutely stupid for Russian climate and distances. If you like to see the T-80 in a modernized option take the T-84 Oplot from Ukraine, it's basically that's what you are looking for. I'd prefer the T-90M Proryv-3.
@@man-who-sold-the-world see broski my pops for example works for nasa and makes 140k plus bonuses. In russia he'd be making 20% of it doing same stuff. How do u think russia competes with USA at 1/15 th military budget?
@@Kray21728SP It would make sense for the Russians to create a new turret that would accommodate the 18 rounds that are outside the autoloader -> 10 in the turret bustle and 8 outside the hull. A bustle autoloader would be needed to make use of the 18 rounds -- just as in the Burlak program. You could probably increase the ammunition load to 22 rounds in the turret bustle.
Make some sense. Almost forgot to know that the T-90MS is a Export variant. Make sense for other countries to use it like the T-90S for example without the Shtora-1 with added ERA for improved protection while Russia don’t because if they’re fighting against Terrorist with old launchers, then it may help a little bit.
@@kaizenomnibiz5383 because there's only two Islamic nation who's jealous of India one is Pakistan and another one is terrorist supporter Turkey......we don't give shit what others think. Only war will tell which tank is better.
@@TheGreatMarathaArmy LMFAO That's rich coming from a country that rejects their own homemade hardwares. timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/armed-forces-say-no-to-advanced-versions-of-tejas-arjun/articleshow/61620740.cms www.firstpost.com/india/rejection-of-arjun-tanks-and-tejas-lca-augurs-well-for-make-in-india-but-introspection-needed-on-defence-priorities-4208353.html nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-indias-army-hates-its-homemade-arjun-tank-119911 Btw, You miss again. I'm not even from Turkey. At least Altay & Al-Khalid are accepted by their own respective armies. Don't waste money on pointless war. Better used that money for Covid-19 solution and building toilets. www.thaipbsworld.com/10-countries-with-highest-number-of-covid-19-infections-as-of-july-17-2020/ Ok. Ciao.
Serbia already had a capable tank for their military (M84AS-1), so Serbia would buy T-90MS either as a backup tank, or they would buy it in near future
no, it's have 2A46M5, information about 2A82 - fake. Realy T-90 don't need this cannon, becouse old autoloader don't may use new shells like Vacuum-1,2 (they too long), and without this shells 2A82 useless
@@zirkon-jq8tn no, autoloader may use only svinets-1,2 shells, for vacuum need hull modifications, but t-90m don't have them. If you look on this screen (it's object 187) mtdata.ru/u30/photoD1A3/20094341477-0/original.jpg you look plate over fourth wheel from front. It's plate cover notch on side hull armor, for increase radius autoloader for more long shells. T-90 don't have this hull modification, and don't may use new vacuum shell and 2a82 cannon don't needed.
This is wrong info. 46.5 tons and 1000 hp engine - is T-90A/S, not T-90M. In reality T-90M is heavier than T-90MS. 50 tons vs 48 tons. T-90M has a bit more armor and other changes.
Предполагаю, что для поражения живой силы, боезапас 2000 патронов и скорострельность 7,62, гораздо эффективнее, чем всего 300 патронов 12,7. Все от заказчика зависит.
Ok, a total of 40 or 43 rounds is caried, of that 22 in the armoured carousel and 8 in the turret bustle... that's a total of 30 rounds. Where the fuck are the remaining 10/13?
The highest turret I’ve seen is a Leo 2, yes I’ve seen a lot of older Soviet tanks, haven’t seen a t90M, or any of the M models, but the Leo 2 tank from last year takes the cake for height
Russia doesnt want to produce arena for some secret reason,there is some big flaw in system that they dont want to tell.They even tried to sell it for South korea in 90s and they refused.Afganit doesnt exist.Russia never show it to public,that usually means it doesnt exist or just for propaganda purposes.Even on paper afghanit specs looks unrealistically better than west can do and that is unpossible because Russia lacking atm high end tehnologies
@@ustash Russia only 3 year,s ago started produce 2nd generation of thermals that gets on the level of French catherine that they purchased almost 20 years ago.also i dont see point of Israel to steal arena aps tehnical details if they could easy buy it from Russia long time ago
@@glock888 th-cam.com/video/dACxAvHgCyI/w-d-xo.html Oh god forbidd that Russia would produce a better APS then west. The pioneers in the development and implementation of active tank protection systems were Soviet tank builders. The idea of active protection of the tank was first formulated in one of the Tula KB in the late 1950s. The first active protection system "Drozd"was installed on the tank T-55AD, was adopted in 1983.
T-90ms: 1) Designed by Uralvagonzavod for export 2) Manufactured by Uralvagonzavod T90M: 1) Designed by WAR for the WAR 2) Manufactured by Uralvagonzavod
Armata $8-12 million dollars? Are you insane. Few years it could be maybe $5,6 . But today it’s about $3-5 million dollars tops. Remember, they pay for it in rubles not dollars.
Не знаю хорошо это, или плохо, но на танки в буквальном смысле этого слова похожи только русские танки. Всё остальое выглядит как выпавшие из перепуганной и бегущей коровы лепёшки. Для маскировки на поле боя такие "лепёшки" очень даже хороши. А вместимость башни? Может и русским танкостроителям перейти от Т--34-строения к лепёшкостроению?
@@АОАОВОАОАО-щ8о Ну почему же слабым местом? Наоборот, это должно именно сильным (местом) быть. Ну, по крайней мере с высоты моего дивана мне так видеться
That's inaccurate. It probably only costs $1.5M to upgrade a T-90A to T-90M, but it is worth much more than that. T-14 has been estimated to cost around $5.5M.
@@Maks_Morkovkin will you pay for my plane ticket, and also helping me with the visa stuffs? I have been really wanting to settle down in Russia for so long, especially in a rural places/or Russian village or small town where the snow falls. Where are you from? Are you from Russian town where snow falls and autumn exist(cuz we don't have autumn over here)? If you're someone who live in Russian village is small town sorto with snows in winter and have autumn, please call me out and let me live in your town. I wanted to live not in urbanized cities, meaning not the like of Moscow and St.Petersburg and Novosibirsk kinda places? I'm from S.E.Asia, this particular ugly country that used to buy military equipments from Russia(just bought a bunch of su-30 lately). I don't happy that Armed Force here is very sensitive with their stuffs, so they definitely won't let me touch their things right away. Once i even got strike with a gun' buttock for asking to touch one of the soldier's rifle. Will you Russians let me touch the equipments of Russian Armed forces right? I want to come and settled down there if you guys let me touch them. What would i need to be able to live in Russia village or a small town where snows are fall. Thank you very much
@@thureintun1687 im from Moscow, and no, sorry i cant pay for you. In Russia even in most south part, Crimea and Kaukasus there is autumn and even winter with snow. You can check russian embassy to findout what do you need to come here. Actually IDK cuz i never needed to come to Russia, ive born here :) Here is military kinda exhibitions or even better to say Disneyland :) where you can touch, and even get inside lots of weapon stuff. If you have some money you can fly on Jets like Su30 or fire shells from tanks. But its expancive fun. Very. For example Su30 eats 2-3tn fuel for 10 min fly and is costs like 10000$ per 30 min fly or so Here - you can see this place th-cam.com/video/3rB7MtSAjA0/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/jXXNNYX0aTk/w-d-xo.html
@@Maks_Morkovkin are you serious!? Do you mean I can fly along (or fly myself?) a fighter jet like su-30 as a non-military personnel or tourist!? It's very amazing!! Im surprised to hear Russia is that free*. I imagined Russia as abit sensitive with it's military and etc.., and Putin is really really mean. Btw do you like Putin and his way managing on your country? Anyway, yes i love military stuffs, especially US's cuz you know, they're so advanced and cool and chilling. I don't know why, i just want to see these world class military machines in person and if possible even touch them :) I'd be extremely satisfy if i be able to touch or maybe ride along on a T-90m or shot or at least touch Russian frontline ak-74m. Any of that would be my dream come true ! Also Russia is... how do i say it, a bit easy, yeah seem abit more easier than say trying to go to US. Guys at US embassy wouldn't be so letting if i went on to tell that i want to go to USA for touching their military equipment xD I wish Putin let me a free pass into his country and let his military tour. I heard military personals from my country usually went to Russia for training. But I'm already too old to become military personnel myself. Even possible, i won't work for this oppressive armed force of a military. I just want a tour+permission to touch the things, no training, no limitation, no nothing, just want to look the machines, maybe ride along some of them, and touch every single one of them before i coming back to my home country :) Will be absolute dream come true! Oh and thanks for the informative and sensible reply to comment about my kinda immature desire. Also i would really appreciate if you mind recommending me of which village or town or maybe small city would be best for settling for outsider who want a peaceful lifestyle with really few friends. I want my dream home to be in a place where autumn exist, where snow falls, (no need to be consistent), peaceful and not so urbanized. Which Russian town would be your choice of place to go relaxing in maybe longholiday with your family? Maybe that answer would coincide with my desirable town. Oh there's one must have though, good electricity and water source. Thank you very much for your patience:)
@@thureintun1687 Not by yourself youre not pilot. As tourist. There are training versons with two seats. Yes you can. Here www.aerotour.ru/excursion/flights-on-mig-25.aspx Noone will show you reall military secrets but Mig 29 or Su 27 are not secret att all, NATO has them long time ago. Putin - best leader on the planet without doubt. IDK where to settle, i always live in megapolice and dont know little towns well. For me town with 100 000 ppl is little village.
No, "Karrar" (the propaganda-model) is just an upgraded T-72S "Shilden", T-72S = export-variant of T-72B, without ATGM-ability and less ERA bricks. The IRGC show which way the will go with T-72 upgrade. Anyway, I think they will just build T-90S and/or T-90MS in license, maybe T-90S for the Artesh (regular army) and T-90MS for the Mullah soldiers. Then T-72S (maybe they will still upgrade them) will be handed over to secondary troops or "gifted" to Syria etc. www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_july_2020_global_security_army_industry/iran_irgc_unveils_new_armored_personnel_carriers_and_upgraded_t-72m_main_battle_tank.html www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/iran-unveils-t-72-upgrade
@@marvintiger9631 This is a T-72M tank, not a Karar. You weave nonsense for yourself. This was an upgraded tank of old T72 tanks that was done. This tank was built by the IRGC. Karar tanks are made by the Ministry of Defense.
@@iraniannationalist2732 Yes, I forgot. The IRGC uses T-72M tanks.*** Anyway best is if they just build the T-90S and/or T-90MS ... BMP-3M, BTR-87 ... in license. Very weak core military the Iranians have, only good for their trained asymetrical warfare doctrine ... Time to modernize they old shit. ***Question. I read somewhere that most Iranian T-72 are M variants and not even the S ... is it true? Because other sources say: T-72M = IRGC and T-72S = Regular Army.
@@marvintiger9631 The IRGC also uses the T72S and T72M tanks together. The army uses T72S. You said why the IRGC did not build the T-90 and upgraded the tank. Because production is done by the Ministry of Defense, the IRGC is not allowed to produce. It can only upgrade T72S and M tanks.
@@Daniel-jg8ff Nonsense! The armor is the same, so is the armament and the battlemanagement system. The export variant has the same Relikt armor as the original T-90M used in the Russian army.
Even the last generation T90A with its prehistoric dynamic protection (contact 5) withstands the forehead of THE TOW 2, and it is still a stripped-down option for export
Stupid idiot. This tank was not destroyed, cause ERA save this and crew just go out. And idiot, ur turkey Leopard 2a4 was destroyed by old soviet weapon. Maybe u install ERA on your tanks finally?
th-cam.com/video/lebtHwesjTc/w-d-xo.html I dont saw in Syria T-90s )) You liar )) It was old t-72 tanks without ERA. and also look this video th-cam.com/video/BbHcA6mXX7o/w-d-xo.html You see?? Syria dont have t-90s ! Only old t-72s, some t-64b, and modificated t-72 av !
Thanks for the price list. I will order when ready
you are need to go in russa to get them
Nah some people like to know where their tax money is going others have other reasons so a price list is welcome
@@kuzin392 No you do not.
I somehow find the T-90MS Tagil the most "sexy" tank around.
I was going to say Russia makes sexy looking tanks (so are their fighter jets, even missiles) but you beat me to it by a week lol.
@@arabiano9719 sexy enough, that they have ERA that can decrease the HEAT penetration
@@arabiano9719 especially up the arse.
@Camden Legend What the fuck has that got to do with the t90 tank ?
It’s the cleanliness of the design, especially with the turret. Also the paint job is absolutely beautiful.
that's how documentaries should be done no stupid commercials, great job ir
Hands down Russia has the coolest tanks ever
Idk man the merkava series of tanks are battle tested through and though and have a mean mean look to the them
Do you still think so today? :D
@@orkako Well they have decent tanks not the best but they get the job done, the problem is they seem to not know how to use them properly thats why they are having big losses in ukraine not much because of the tanks being bad. Look at ukraine they use almost the same tanks but use them properly.
@@scothf1273 they know how to use a tank the problem is modern Anti tank weapons. many Ukraine tank was destroyed too some of it from tank vs tank battle, some of ukraine tank is old T-64B and maybe some taken T-72 or T-80 and they only have little number of it
@@scothf1273it’s not so much that
Their tanks are 100% usable
But it’s all designs from the 60’s and 70’s
No one has a “modern” tank
There hasn’t really been a full redesign in a while, but Russia goes further, they have only moderately improved from the T-72A
The M1 is dramatically worse then the M1A2
And the Sep packages have completely changed the armor, improved the shot accuracy and the ammunition has improved drastically as well
The T-90MS is to the T-72A
What the M1A2 Tusk is to the M1
When it should be what the M1A2 SEPv3 is to the M60TTS
But it’s just not
T-14 was a chance
But Russia just doesn’t have the capacity to make these massive improvements anymore
It costs too much and takes too long
T-14 wont be a true Russian tank without the mytical wooden log
That's the gun depression. When they need it they deploy it (means drop behind the tank) then they reverse upon it and this way they have gun depression :) Stalinwood is life comrade!
@ I thought It was to help the tank get out of mud
@@lingeringsnowleaf3829 it is that guy was joking
@ i hope you're joking
@@Kalashnikov413 More exactly it's an iconic and classic joke. And as you see no one has a sense of humor because everyone is a triggered snowflake nowadays!
T-90M has the same engine as T-90MS. Even new T-72B3M has the V92S2F now.
T-90M also has an upgraded autoloader that can use longer APFSDS projectiles. T-90MS doesn't.
Cuz indisn csnt afford better round
@@ahmadariqdarwish2042 No because Russia will not and have never exported their best equipment
@@Daniel-jg8ff true
What does APFSDS stand for
@@AppleSauc3Good Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot
The engine power of the T-90M is wrong, it is not 1000 HP, both tanks use the V-92S2F with 1130 HP
I read they have engine V-96 12 cylinder, multi-fuel diesel 1,250 hp (930 kW) but I don’t see them push it use.
Ya this is confusing me. Most sources are stating only 1000hp for t90m but this makes little sense to me as I don’t see how/why the export version of a tank could/should have a better engine than that of the native/indigenous version. You’d think the Russian army would be using the better variant of their own vehicle
@@sumrandumguy7177 Maybe even though it has higher Horsepower it has less Torque
@@sumrandumguy7177 I mean if you think about it; its cheaper to switch the engine out with the new one when upgrading and there isn't a huge performance gap between the two variants so you can upgrade your current T-90 arsenal with up-to-date technology without breaking the bank which russia is obviously trying to do. Though from what I heard; its mixed sources meaning they may use the export engine whilst others say it will not.
1) There's two T-90MSs. T-90MS mod. 2011 was the new export T-90 version replacing T-90SA featuring Relikt ERA, Sosna-U, CITV, new 1130hp V-92S2F engine, satelite navigation, air conditioning, "Kalina" FCS, automatic transmission and wheel steering, remote machine gun station with 7.62 PKT MG, ERA sideskirts and the 2A46M-5 gun with new autoloader that is able to fire Svinets APFSDS. It was already deployed on T-90A, but T-90S lacked it. Uralvagonzavod also offered this package to Russian military as T-90AM (not to be confused with T-90M) but they didnt order any as they were presumably waiting for Armata to start production soon enough.
2) T-90M Proryv-3 is the latest variant that Russian military now ordered, it has all the T-90MS mod. 2011 improvements plus some tech derived from Armata: new turret with Kord-MT 12.7mm MG (all T-90s that are domestically ordered come with 12.7mm MGs), safe ammo rack, partial Afganit APS, aramid lining, upgraded fire control system with networking functionality and 2A82-1M gun - same barrel is used on Armata but autoloader size is unchanged, so it's unable to fire new Vacuum APFSDS, but has better bore life and accuracy.
3) The new T-90MS is an export version of T-90M. The differences are 7.62mm PKT MG instead of Kord, optional Arena-E APS instead of Afganit and the gun is still 2A46M-5.
NO T-90M WAS EQUIPPED WITH THE 2A82 GUN, IT'S JUST A UNPROVEN MYTH
IF YOU'RE STAY WITH THAT MYTH, YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT
@@Kalashnikov413 proof/reasoning? It's not like that gun is something new, it was ready for production in 90s.
Omg again morons. T-90MS not export version of 90M, because MS was created first.
@@exodus1621 yes, you are right
T-14 is 4.5 million USD, T-90MS is around 3 million and T-90M is 3.5 million USD.
Yep ...even a shit tank in the west will be more expensive coz the labor there is expensive .
Weel i mean Usa
Nah, T-14 cos more than that
@@mr.waffentrager4400 wrong, the government pay I higher price for the lobby, and to the executives of the industry to put more money in their pockets
@@mr.waffentrager4400 in Russia all the armament industries is managed by the government
T-90 has always been an impressive MBT. And a very practical, logical weapons system program. Cheaper than the T-80 and more reliable. Glad (if I was Russian) to see the T-80s are being re-engined amongst other upgrades and returned to the active duty force.
The T-80 are about to be reengined with a 1500hp turbine-engine
I hope they won't, the T-80 is basically the heavily modernized T-64. Also is a turbine engine absolutely stupid for Russian climate and distances. If you like to see the T-80 in a modernized option take the T-84 Oplot from Ukraine, it's basically that's what you are looking for. I'd prefer the T-90M Proryv-3.
@@foshizzlfizzl the Ukrainians are only using their only Oplot for display, the other one I think was exported to Thailand
@@mcphan6881 yeah you are right. But at least it fits more the description that was mentioned before
Look the T-80BV
T14 is 3.8 not 12 million! Per Pentagon estimate
Cheaper than most nato tanks
Nah t 14 is very expensive. I doubt only 3 million.
@@man-who-sold-the-world see broski my pops for example works for nasa and makes 140k plus bonuses. In russia he'd be making 20% of it doing same stuff. How do u think russia competes with USA at 1/15 th military budget?
@@man-who-sold-the-world 3.8 for Russian Federation, more for export, if they decide to!
can't be that cheap that estimation is way off
T-90M and T-90MS have the same engine. And T-90M weight is 50 tons, not 46,5 tons.
I can tell the T-90M looks heavier too.
Well forgot to know that the T-90M have a .50 cal. Kord machine gun while the T-90MS have a PKT machine gun. I watch it at Red Effect’s video.
Yeah , why downgrade from a .51 cal machine gun to a 7.62 machine gun on the RWS?
It was showcase tank (with 7,62) tank that were delivered were delivered with 12,7
Design hull is the same. Turret too. Exception of the Russian one is the net for stopping anti tank projectiles, while the export don’t.
@@Kray21728SP
It would make sense for the Russians to create a new turret that would accommodate the 18 rounds that are outside the autoloader -> 10 in the turret bustle and 8 outside the hull.
A bustle autoloader would be needed to make use of the 18 rounds -- just as in the Burlak program. You could probably increase the ammunition load to 22 rounds in the turret bustle.
Make some sense. Almost forgot to know that the T-90MS is a Export variant. Make sense for other countries to use it like the T-90S for example without the Shtora-1 with added ERA for improved protection while Russia don’t because if they’re fighting against Terrorist with old launchers, then it may help a little bit.
Great videos!
Keep them coming! :)
Love Russia 🇷🇺 from India 🇮🇳❤️ India has ordered a large number of tanks.
Indian army ordered 464 units of T90MS Tanks last year after evaluating it through various tests.
Couldn't wait for Arjun Mk-3?
@@kaizenomnibiz5383 Arjun is not our main battle tank but still it's more than enough for your Pakistani Chinese tanks.....
@@TheGreatMarathaArmy
What makes you think I'm a Pakistani?
To me, both Arjun and Al-Khalid sucks.
@@kaizenomnibiz5383 because there's only two Islamic nation who's jealous of India one is Pakistan and another one is terrorist supporter Turkey......we don't give shit what others think. Only war will tell which tank is better.
@@TheGreatMarathaArmy
LMFAO
That's rich coming from a country that rejects their own homemade hardwares.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/armed-forces-say-no-to-advanced-versions-of-tejas-arjun/articleshow/61620740.cms
www.firstpost.com/india/rejection-of-arjun-tanks-and-tejas-lca-augurs-well-for-make-in-india-but-introspection-needed-on-defence-priorities-4208353.html
nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-indias-army-hates-its-homemade-arjun-tank-119911
Btw,
You miss again.
I'm not even from Turkey.
At least Altay & Al-Khalid are accepted by their own respective armies.
Don't waste money on pointless war.
Better used that money for Covid-19 solution and building toilets.
www.thaipbsworld.com/10-countries-with-highest-number-of-covid-19-infections-as-of-july-17-2020/
Ok.
Ciao.
Excelente información, ambos son tanques impresionantes, bien por el canal que pone subtítulos en español.👍😃
No tiene en español xd
Pretty sure the T90M has the V92S2F aswell?
Yes it has the V-92S2F 1130 HP engine, he is wrong in the video
@@Maverick966 No Russians are using 1000 hp engine. 1130 hp engine is option they don't seem to prefer for some reason.
@@Mandrak789 Nope, only the T-90A use the 1000 hp engine, T-90M and T-72B3 late use the more modern 1130 hp engine
would it hurt them to upgrade the gearbox the reverse gear on t-72 t-90 and to some degree t-80 have terrible reverse speed
Nice video and very informative and very entertaining and very satisfaction.
T90M prov3 for Russian army...
T90MS tagil for variant export..???
Yes
@Joseph Stalin it's literally the same tank with different modification
Mau beli pun pasti kena sanksi embargo sama Amerika 😓😓😓
@@radityac.m.s6851 buat aoe nak beli dah ade leopard
The T-90MS (object 188MS) is an export version of the T-90M tank. Unlike the T-90M, the tank is fitted with a 2A46M-5 cannon
Русские танки лучшие )))) СССР рулит
Что есть, то есть!
Ссср- кусок говна. Чёрное пятно в истории России
@@hwbxjr Черное петно это ты
@@hwbxjr Кусок омна это ты..
The M version is more better, it has RPG net, more rounds, 12.7mm on the turret...
Самые лучшие танки в России, это было,это есть и так будет всегда.Хоть зубы сотрите ,а у НАТО ни чего подобных нашим ! НЕТ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Хорошая шутка)
@@НикитаФилимонов-и3ц это не шутка
Я тоже патриот. Но стоит признать что Абрамс и леопарды очень опасные танчики
❤ t90 t90m
Nice design
they do not weigh 46.5 tons, I think their weight is in the range of 50-51 tons, 46.5 tons weighs T90A
Both Tanks are Lethal...➡️💪➡️👍
Even PzIII is lethal :)
Guten Morgen5
Maus is lethal
Can a t90 m or t90 ms can take down an m1a2 abrams?
If the crew know where the weakspot is (which is the 51mm UFP), then yes
@@Kalashnikov413 ok thanks
@@Kalashnikov413duh malah disamain sama game kan lawak,lu kira tank engagement cmn 100 meter?
in a proper professional analysis, the one who gets the shot of first wins.
But yes, if it shoots first it sure can.
Serbia should buy T 90 MS Tagil tanks
zakaj?
Serbia already had a capable tank for their military (M84AS-1), so Serbia would buy T-90MS either as a backup tank, or they would buy it in near future
@@Kalashnikov413 nah, leep it up with M84
The T 90 M have another canon, from the T 14 Armata.
no, it's have 2A46M5, information about 2A82 - fake. Realy T-90 don't need this cannon, becouse old autoloader don't may use new shells like Vacuum-1,2 (they too long), and without this shells 2A82 useless
@@Lancetdrone is no Fake.
@@Lancetdrone the autoloader is ready.
@@zirkon-jq8tn no, autoloader may use only svinets-1,2 shells, for vacuum need hull modifications, but t-90m don't have them. If you look on this screen (it's object 187) mtdata.ru/u30/photoD1A3/20094341477-0/original.jpg you look plate over fourth wheel from front. It's plate cover notch on side hull armor, for increase radius autoloader for more long shells. T-90 don't have this hull modification, and don't may use new vacuum shell and 2a82 cannon don't needed.
@daAnder71 it have 2a46m5, not 2a82
I am surprised that such great tank only had a cost of 4 million by looking at it, l estimate 8 million or something.
Very good👍 I'll order both.
Wait why is the T-90MS heavier?
I don't get it either, I mean engine is probably heavier but 2 tons is too much
This is wrong info. 46.5 tons and 1000 hp engine - is T-90A/S, not T-90M. In reality T-90M is heavier than T-90MS. 50 tons vs 48 tons. T-90M has a bit more armor and other changes.
2:18 wrong... t-90m uses same main gun as T-14 armata
Wrong, no T-90M uses the 2A82M-1 gun
They still use the 2A46M-5 gun
@@Kalashnikov413 lol... noooooo
@@Kalashnikov413 lol noooooo
@@Daniel-jg8ff yes, they are
the gun on T-90M has bore evacuator, while the gun on Armata doesn't have one
Which is better T90M or T90MS ?
Т-90М!
@@UltraTotenkopf thank you
Awesome....😎
Сравнение т90м и т90мс это гениально 🙂👍
1000 hp and 46.5 tons on T90a. on the T90m there are 1130 hp and 48 tons everywhere.
На фото М выглядит шикарно. Почему на MC поставили 7,62мм не понятно.
Для экспорта же
@@Zzuiho а в чем разница?
@@PaprikaSergey Так себе всё самое хорошее, а другим плохое. + может ради удешевления
Предполагаю, что для поражения живой силы, боезапас 2000 патронов и скорострельность 7,62, гораздо эффективнее, чем всего 300 патронов 12,7. Все от заказчика зависит.
@@render174 возможно. Но башня мне у них больше нравится, чем у Арматы и предыдущих можелей. Плоская. Каку Меркавы.
Ok, a total of 40 or 43 rounds is caried, of that 22 in the armoured carousel and 8 in the turret bustle... that's a total of 30 rounds. Where the fuck are the remaining 10/13?
In the armored compartment in front of the engine bulkhead, behind the loading carousel.
m1 abrams has a mighty looks on it. on the other hand the t-90m/sm is more sexier and sleeker
Actually I hate the M1 looks, like it looks like my 6yr son designed it, just a blocks design
I didn't know the T90M existed lmao, I thought it was just another name for the T90MS.
My country operates every version of T-90S, T-90MS 😂😂😂
didn't knew the T-90M was exported
@@Kalashnikov413 I am dumb T-90 M isn't exported😅
@@Kalashnikov413 Russia is now upgrading the algerian T90 s to T90MS
очень крутые танки
T90 M is a piece of art.
fast forward to 2022 and we all know how T 90 is doing
Nah thats the S
Which one has the highest flying turret?
both are joint with the leo 2
The highest turret I’ve seen is a Leo 2, yes I’ve seen a lot of older Soviet tanks, haven’t seen a t90M, or any of the M models, but the Leo 2 tank from last year takes the cake for height
those cost predictions were wrong
1:33 u even write it relikt why you read it realictec?
No active protection. Why going backwards? I don't understand. Why not just adding Arena or Afghanit as APS?
Russia doesnt want to produce arena for some secret reason,there is some big flaw in system that they dont want to tell.They even tried to sell it for South korea in 90s and they refused.Afganit doesnt exist.Russia never show it to public,that usually means it doesnt exist or just for propaganda purposes.Even on paper afghanit specs looks unrealistically better than west can do and that is unpossible because Russia lacking atm high end tehnologies
@@ustash Russia only 3 year,s ago started produce 2nd generation of thermals that gets on the level of French catherine that they purchased almost 20 years ago.also i dont see point of Israel to steal arena aps tehnical details if they could easy buy it from Russia long time ago
@@glock888 th-cam.com/video/dACxAvHgCyI/w-d-xo.html
Oh god forbidd that Russia would produce a better APS then west. The pioneers in the development and implementation of active tank protection systems were Soviet tank builders. The idea of active protection of the tank was first formulated in one of the Tula KB in the late 1950s. The first active protection system "Drozd"was installed on the tank T-55AD, was adopted in 1983.
T-90ms:
1) Designed by Uralvagonzavod for export
2) Manufactured by Uralvagonzavod
T90M:
1) Designed by WAR for the WAR
2) Manufactured by Uralvagonzavod
Από.τα..καλυτερα..στον..κοσμο
Συχαριτηρια Ρωσία και εις.ανωτερα..απο.κυπρο
The 12.7mm gun for a 7.62mm gun is such a big down grade. Technicals and light armored vehicles are so common on the modern battlefield.
💪🇷🇺👍
自己用的肯定好过外贸的
Armata $8-12 million dollars? Are you insane. Few years it could be maybe $5,6 . But today it’s about $3-5 million dollars tops. Remember, they pay for it in rubles not dollars.
Не знаю хорошо это, или плохо, но на танки в буквальном смысле этого слова похожи только русские танки. Всё остальое выглядит как выпавшие из перепуганной и бегущей коровы лепёшки. Для маскировки на поле боя такие "лепёшки" очень даже хороши. А вместимость башни? Может и русским танкостроителям перейти от Т--34-строения к лепёшкостроению?
It would be good to have a trophy type active protection against bombs from ucavs
Radar datalinked flak gun
Spaag vehicle not far
The difference is the t-90MS has a cooler paint job.
That's objective.
Почему не делают как у израильтян, -спаренный с орудием крупноколиберный пулемёт?или как у пмб 3
Это бубет слабым местом танка
@@АОАОВОАОАО-щ8о
Ну почему же слабым местом?
Наоборот, это должно именно сильным (местом) быть.
Ну, по крайней мере с высоты моего дивана мне так видеться
Я лежу на деване))
🇷🇺👍🏻🥃
Armata is US$15 million, whilst T90M is US$1.5 Million ???? Armata must be damn good.
That's inaccurate. It probably only costs $1.5M to upgrade a T-90A to T-90M, but it is worth much more than that. T-14 has been estimated to cost around $5.5M.
I think Britain and Russia should make a tank it would be a good way to gain relations and a new tank for both sides
ahahaahaha=)))))))))))))))))))))
ROFL Britain never will think about how to be in good relations with Russia. Britain hunreds of years is locomotive of antiRussia hysteria in Europe
Britain will do what ever America will tell.Right now Russia is America enemy so Britain have to hate Russia.its very simple
@@glock888 your joking right we arnt there pupet and there relations have nothing to do with us. America is laughable anyway
Britain will always hate Russia. Cocky little island nation who still thinks they have an empire. Absolutely useless without the US.
T 90 MS IS A REAL MONSTER
👍😎🍺🍩
It's the same tank if you didn't know. MS is an export option. It has worse characteristics.
MS is a modernized export version of the A variant, not the M variant .
@@HugoDiasR bruh T-90M have proryv in behind, they dont have S
@@ahmadariqdarwish2042 yes they have a S version, the first export variant
@@HugoDiasR I know
💜💜💜💜💜
I want to touch T-90M
Just for a second
Please will you guys let me do this?
easy. Come to Russia, you can even fire shells from it
@@Maks_Morkovkin will you pay for my plane ticket, and also helping me with the visa stuffs?
I have been really wanting to settle down in Russia for so long, especially in a rural places/or Russian village or small town where the snow falls.
Where are you from? Are you from Russian town where snow falls and autumn exist(cuz we don't have autumn over here)? If you're someone who live in Russian village is small town sorto with snows in winter and have autumn, please call me out and let me live in your town. I wanted to live not in urbanized cities, meaning not the like of Moscow and St.Petersburg and Novosibirsk kinda places?
I'm from S.E.Asia, this particular ugly country that used to buy military equipments from Russia(just bought a bunch of su-30 lately). I don't happy that Armed Force here is very sensitive with their stuffs, so they definitely won't let me touch their things right away. Once i even got strike with a gun' buttock for asking to touch one of the soldier's rifle.
Will you Russians let me touch the equipments of Russian Armed forces right? I want to come and settled down there if you guys let me touch them. What would i need to be able to live in Russia village or a small town where snows are fall.
Thank you very much
@@thureintun1687 im from Moscow, and no, sorry i cant pay for you.
In Russia even in most south part, Crimea and Kaukasus there is autumn and even winter with snow.
You can check russian embassy to findout what do you need to come here. Actually IDK cuz i never needed to come to Russia, ive born here :)
Here is military kinda exhibitions or even better to say Disneyland :) where you can touch, and even get inside lots of weapon stuff. If you have some money you can fly on Jets like Su30 or fire shells from tanks. But its expancive fun. Very. For example Su30 eats 2-3tn fuel for 10 min fly and is costs like 10000$ per 30 min fly or so
Here - you can see this place
th-cam.com/video/3rB7MtSAjA0/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/jXXNNYX0aTk/w-d-xo.html
@@Maks_Morkovkin are you serious!? Do you mean I can fly along (or fly myself?) a fighter jet like su-30 as a non-military personnel or tourist!? It's very amazing!!
Im surprised to hear Russia is that free*. I imagined Russia as abit sensitive with it's military and etc.., and Putin is really really mean. Btw do you like Putin and his way managing on your country?
Anyway, yes i love military stuffs, especially US's cuz you know, they're so advanced and cool and chilling. I don't know why, i just want to see these world class military machines in person and if possible even touch them :) I'd be extremely satisfy if i be able to touch or maybe ride along on a T-90m or shot or at least touch Russian frontline ak-74m. Any of that would be my dream come true !
Also Russia is... how do i say it, a bit easy, yeah seem abit more easier than say trying to go to US. Guys at US embassy wouldn't be so letting if i went on to tell that i want to go to USA for touching their military equipment xD
I wish Putin let me a free pass into his country and let his military tour. I heard military personals from my country usually went to Russia for training. But I'm already too old to become military personnel myself. Even possible, i won't work for this oppressive armed force of a military. I just want a tour+permission to touch the things, no training, no limitation, no nothing, just want to look the machines, maybe ride along some of them, and touch every single one of them before i coming back to my home country :)
Will be absolute dream come true!
Oh and thanks for the informative and sensible reply to comment about my kinda immature desire.
Also i would really appreciate if you mind recommending me of which village or town or maybe small city would be best for settling for outsider who want a peaceful lifestyle with really few friends. I want my dream home to be in a place where autumn exist, where snow falls, (no need to be consistent), peaceful and not so urbanized. Which Russian town would be your choice of place to go relaxing in maybe longholiday with your family? Maybe that answer would coincide with my desirable town. Oh there's one must have though, good electricity and water source.
Thank you very much for your patience:)
@@thureintun1687 Not by yourself youre not pilot. As tourist. There are training versons with two seats. Yes you can. Here www.aerotour.ru/excursion/flights-on-mig-25.aspx
Noone will show you reall military secrets but Mig 29 or Su 27 are not secret att all, NATO has them long time ago.
Putin - best leader on the planet without doubt.
IDK where to settle, i always live in megapolice and dont know little towns well. For me town with 100 000 ppl is little village.
it's hard to tell a difference. both do explode the same way when hit by a javelin...
your house too🫣
T90m/ms has APS and is rarely used in the current battlefield so no
Ain't this just a Super dotated T-72
Leopard 2a7 is a Super Dotated leopard 1
No. It's a descendent of the t-34.
T90👍🤝🇭🇺🍷
Thumbs up!
Uncle Sam: Say Hello to My TOW😂
T-90М : Say hello to my ARENA-M,TOW!
Also T-90M: Say hello to my Relikt ERA
@@Kalashnikov413 and api sistem
@@ser43_OLDC Say hello to my spike LR Dual Tandem charge
@@Mrpsychopath007 aps sistem and soft kill sistem
SUPER. TANK VMIRE. T. 14. T. 90 M. T. 90 MC. T. 80 BVM. T. 72. 3. BVM. ❤
i choose t90m
they are very similar to the Israeli merkava 4 tank
Karrar is a T90MS
No, "Karrar" (the propaganda-model) is just an upgraded T-72S "Shilden", T-72S = export-variant of T-72B, without ATGM-ability and less ERA bricks.
The IRGC show which way the will go with T-72 upgrade.
Anyway, I think they will just build T-90S and/or T-90MS in license, maybe T-90S for the Artesh (regular army) and T-90MS for the Mullah soldiers.
Then T-72S (maybe they will still upgrade them) will be handed over to secondary troops or "gifted" to Syria etc.
www.armyrecognition.com/defense_news_july_2020_global_security_army_industry/iran_irgc_unveils_new_armored_personnel_carriers_and_upgraded_t-72m_main_battle_tank.html
www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/iran-unveils-t-72-upgrade
@@marvintiger9631 This is a T-72M tank, not a Karar. You weave nonsense for yourself. This was an upgraded tank of old T72 tanks that was done. This tank was built by the IRGC. Karar tanks are made by the Ministry of Defense.
@@iraniannationalist2732 Yes, I forgot.
The IRGC uses T-72M tanks.***
Anyway best is if they just build the T-90S and/or T-90MS ...
BMP-3M, BTR-87 ... in license.
Very weak core military the Iranians have, only good for their trained asymetrical warfare doctrine ...
Time to modernize they old shit.
***Question.
I read somewhere that most Iranian T-72 are M variants and not even the S ... is it true?
Because other sources say: T-72M = IRGC and T-72S = Regular Army.
@@marvintiger9631 The IRGC also uses the T72S and T72M tanks together. The army uses T72S. You said why the IRGC did not build the T-90 and upgraded the tank. Because production is done by the Ministry of Defense, the IRGC is not allowed to produce. It can only upgrade T72S and M tanks.
Т - 90 мs на европейских танк похоже
Russian TANK is AMAZ!NG
,,👍
Thích xe tang mỹ và Đức hon
Автор тупица на Т-90М вес 48 тонн и двигатель там установлен В92С2Ф
This video is pointless, both variants are pretty much the same
Noop
@@Daniel-jg8ff yeep
@@xAlexTobiasxB No. Different armor, armament, battlefield management etc etc
@@Daniel-jg8ff Nonsense! The armor is the same, so is the armament and the battlemanagement system.
The export variant has the same Relikt armor as the original T-90M used in the Russian army.
Завидуйте вражины😀шутка
The main difference between this 2 tanks, is the number of meters that their turrets will fly when hit by an ukrainan javelin
Cope there not in Ukraine
@@mbtenjoyer9487 t90's have been in ukraine
@@retkimuna no T-90M or T-90MS are in Ukraine
@@mbtenjoyer9487 yeah you're right, just t90a's
@@mbtenjoyer9487 first t-90m loss in ukraine
I don't care how you compare, because they both suck in war
since when does russia sell 'superior'tanks to their's?
Wikipedia : Monkey Model
@John Matrix can you proved it?
@John Matrix typical murica idiot. Go kiss biden ass
А по русски?
Т 90 мс-меньше срет😊
унитаз против унитаза
axaxaxa, clown ))
Both tank engine is worst
In syria this tank destroy by anti tank 🤣
Which one, you dumb ape? Syrian T-90A was hit with a missile and was mostly intact. Neither T90M nor T90MS were hit so go eat some shit
Even the last generation T90A with its prehistoric dynamic protection (contact 5) withstands the forehead of THE TOW 2, and it is still a stripped-down option for export
Stupid idiot. This tank was not destroyed, cause ERA save this and crew just go out. And idiot, ur turkey Leopard 2a4 was destroyed by old soviet weapon. Maybe u install ERA on your tanks finally?
And what makes you laugthing ? Any tank can be destroyed by Antitank ta-da-m surprise!
How many savages ISIS it killed before ?
th-cam.com/video/lebtHwesjTc/w-d-xo.html I dont saw in Syria T-90s )) You liar )) It was old t-72 tanks without ERA. and also look this video th-cam.com/video/BbHcA6mXX7o/w-d-xo.html You see?? Syria dont have t-90s ! Only old t-72s, some t-64b, and modificated t-72 av !
Reverse speed still 4kmph?
Based on what I found, 15 km/h
@@ironbuben746 Well 15kmph is better than 5 but still slow!
ПРОПАГАНДА !!
Proryv