The DONAR Self-Propelled Artillery Gun

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 203

  • @JCRichardson117
    @JCRichardson117 13 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    it looks like an MLRS has had a baby with a pzh2000

  • @Toolpusher
    @Toolpusher 10 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I had to mute this as the soundtrack was doing my head in right from the start. I can only imagine that anyone actually looking to buy Arty would think the same.

    • @Zeroczar
      @Zeroczar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you sat/stood near artillery I doubt you would hear much.

  • @elitebuster2012
    @elitebuster2012 10 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    this add looks like a 90's nentendo add.

    • @042576705
      @042576705 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @042576705
      @042576705 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's all just fun and games :-)

  • @wogelson
    @wogelson ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Germans made an other similar vehicle on a truck chassis called the HX3 and on the modular Boxer APC called RCH 155

  • @sonnyvaughan1372
    @sonnyvaughan1372 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Spent 10 yrs on a special love this gun

  • @Jermo7899
    @Jermo7899 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 5:52 I’d be pissing my pants yelling for mommy.

  • @derxman
    @derxman 10 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Bigger, Better, GERMAN!

    • @aumann0452
      @aumann0452 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      when ww2 was over germans president sayed ,, wer jemals wieder eine Waffe in die Hand nimmt dem soll die Hand abfallen" ,, WHO ever hold a gun, his hand should fall off

    • @Batmanderp38
      @Batmanderp38 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      derxman anything german built in my eyes is marvellous.

  • @IamtheAlienator
    @IamtheAlienator 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    LOL. They were looking at the city of Kassel (Northern Hesse) on their target map! O.o... Other than that: I agree with tipex12: chassis looks instable and too weak. Engine seemed to have some trouble with the load.

  • @Songchou_Gaming
    @Songchou_Gaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally found my childhood video ❤️

  • @LegacyIvyTerascale
    @LegacyIvyTerascale 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    arties are used outside the urban areas , as far as i know
    and , as the footage , this one is unstable when shooting sideways

    • @valeinikofff
      @valeinikofff 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      unstable... you shud see the yugoslav nora, there the barrel shakes in sinusoid waves after each fire)))

    • @garretk1415
      @garretk1415 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Adrian Fidi thats why the body turns

  • @itsthelepto
    @itsthelepto 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    That recoil so awesome

  • @Tasseratul
    @Tasseratul 13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I hope to work for them someday, Love KMW and germans hehe ^^

    • @Neeverseen
      @Neeverseen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Mr. Castillo?
      It has been 10 years, did you realize your dream?

  • @baddoggie101
    @baddoggie101 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Golly gee, I sure would like to have one of them fancy-shmancy new guns.

  • @readhistory2023
    @readhistory2023 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a M548 and mounted a gun turret on the back. The rear loader is a bit high. 155mm rounds are 97 lbs. so you're putting strain on the loader unnecessarily by having it so high off the ground. I like the auto loader but 6 rpm is slower than manual. I'm not sure the fewer troops is worth the reduced output.

  • @TrangleC
    @TrangleC 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm not Dave but I'll still address your question: What would be the point of forcing a MBT into the roll of a self propelled howitzer? A tank is a tank and artillery is artillery. That is why I don't get British tank fans who say the L30 gun is better than smooth bore tank guns because it is more accurate when firing conventional shells over long distances. That is just not what a MBT is supposed to do.

  • @vikramjitpaul7050
    @vikramjitpaul7050 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want this artillery gun in my country. The Indian Army wants this kind of guns to neutralize the target.

  • @smilitary7368
    @smilitary7368 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would be good if you could load straight from DROPS pallets charges and shells already packed for loading

  • @falouchelo
    @falouchelo 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    dont know who called that a ''DONAR'' but this is the light version of the Panzerhaubitze 2000 made by Krauss-maffei wegmann. The heavy version looks like a Ferdinand.

    • @SiegeFritz
      @SiegeFritz 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since entering service with the German Army in 1995, the PzH2000 Self-Propelled Gun artillery system has also been successfully exported due to having the fastest rate of fire for modern Self-propelled gun’s and digital fire control technology as well as a Rheinmetall 52cal Length main gun for increased range and accuracy.
      The PzH2000 manufacturer, German Firm Krauss-Maffei went on to developed the Artillery Gun Module (AGM) in 2004. Based on the extensive experience garnered with the PzH2000, the AGM is an unmanned, fully-automatic (it loads the breach of the main gun and lays it on to the target) and platform independent artillery gun module utilizing systems from the PzH2000, including its Rheinmetall 52cal Length main gun.
      Weight 12.5 tonne
      Length 10.3m
      Width 2.8m
      Height 1.9m
      Armament 155mm / L52 cal.
      Fire rate 6 rounds per minute
      Range 56km
      Combat load 30 projectiles & 145 charges (stored in magazines located in the module)
      Crew unmanned (1-2 soldiers outside the module)
      Source: tanknutdave.com

  • @er.01aia77
    @er.01aia77 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When it a put a shell and charge is like a "Robot".

  • @TankNutDave
    @TankNutDave  13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @1993VNG no, click on the link under the video to my site and all the info you need about this vehicle is there :)

  • @DefaultString
    @DefaultString 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To me, the canon reaching wide over the vehicle looks like a huge crash risk e.g. during turning into forests with trees standing very close to each oher.

    • @alangordon3283
      @alangordon3283 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’ve obviously not see previous self propelled artillery in the 175mm and larger types .

  • @andrewcarlson3486
    @andrewcarlson3486 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    its basically a mlrs with an artillery gun turret on the back

    • @ole-thorolffeldheim3187
      @ole-thorolffeldheim3187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only the prototypes are based on mlrs - serial production is based on an ascod mech infantry tanks... but the mainpoint is the howitzer.
      So what’s your point?

  • @TrangleC
    @TrangleC 12 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is not a weapon build to singlehandedly win World War 3, it is a smaller, cheaper, easier to airlift alternative to the PzH2000, to be used in low intensity warfare like in Afghanistan.
    It just has to be mobile enough to get from the airport to a main base and perhaps from there to a forward firing position on some hill near the base where it fires a few rounds at some insurgents 30 km away and drives back into the base afterwards.

  • @Serkanbah
    @Serkanbah 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    auto fire is good because less crew.barrel and range?

  • @aumann0452
    @aumann0452 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    isnt that the turret of a Krupp_steyr waffenträger?

  • @wasimjaan3300
    @wasimjaan3300 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Electronics packed inside this machine must suffer serious shock....

  • @junaidsafdar1165
    @junaidsafdar1165 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful

  • @Fedaykin24
    @Fedaykin24 13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hmmm a compact semi stealthy turret, a simplified automated modular charge system and an autoloader. I would say this looks suspiciously like the Germans experiments with making a 155mm naval turret based on pzh2000 technology and placing it on an affordable chassis.

  • @Joebar6611
    @Joebar6611 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This music is, uh, very interesting.

  • @admonster11
    @admonster11 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hope Santa brings me one!

  • @joses2502
    @joses2502 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    menudo retroceso, parece que va a volcar

  • @gusgone4527
    @gusgone4527 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    This cheaper fully automated wheeled artillery firing smart rounds, is the future.

    • @mattskustomkreations
      @mattskustomkreations ปีที่แล้ว

      Even cheaper drone has entered the chat.

    • @gusgone4527
      @gusgone4527 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattskustomkreations Cheap drones are easy to block.

    • @mattskustomkreations
      @mattskustomkreations ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gusgone4527 Apparently not easily enough on the battlefields of Ukraine. But maybe the videos of successful hits we see are in the minority?

    • @gusgone4527
      @gusgone4527 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattskustomkreations Or neither side is in possession of "state of the art" counter drone technology. For obvious reasons.
      There are reasons why NATO arsenals are not stacked full of simple (cheap) armed radio controlled aircraft. The technology to make them has been around for decades but all we see are target drones for gunnery practice. Those kinds of weapons are notoriously vulnerable to EW countermeasures. Not only can the most sophisticated "secure" data links be cracked and tampered with. They can be blocked and shut down completely. The cheaper the technology used, the easier it is to identify, locate, disrupt or destroy.
      Which brings us back to wheeled artillery systems being used to very accurately eliminate point targets. An infantry section or AFV operating a drone weapon. Is actually broadcasting it's exact location to anyone smart enough to be looking for them.
      FYI I'm retired now and my knowledge is out of date. But even so, I know that when it comes to electronic signals "silence is golden."

  • @Reece1Harding
    @Reece1Harding 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought the charges were bog rolls and the dude was going to take a shit in the back

  • @kartikeysood1302
    @kartikeysood1302 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks cool

  • @Batmanderp38
    @Batmanderp38 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If anyone here knows warthunder do you guys reckon they should add this but if it’s too op tweak the ammunition or the armour?

  • @CCM1199
    @CCM1199 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like its based on the Volcano mile field laying system...

  • @TanerCoin
    @TanerCoin 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    nice but looks very expensive

  • @glsblink
    @glsblink 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wonder if there is emp attack the thing still works ? And can the thing with stand continues fire like 100 rounds every one hr ?

    • @JustinKoenigSilica
      @JustinKoenigSilica 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      no, it won't work. why do people ask these questions? THIS THING IS 40 KM BEHIND THE FRONTLINE.
      yes, it can fire very fast. but you need to supply it with ammo for that to work at all.

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Justin Koenig that said u need to supply everythink with ammo for it to shoot !!

  • @pauljason632
    @pauljason632 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The hand loading is very tedious and slow,,how about a conveyor system from the ammo truck to the cannon vehicle?.

  • @TheShiraz92
    @TheShiraz92 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It better beat Russia artillery system

  • @cameronminke8588
    @cameronminke8588 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    this is way better then the archer

    • @TwoFistsOneHalleluja
      @TwoFistsOneHalleluja 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Archer > Caesar > Donar

    • @TwoFistsOneHalleluja
      @TwoFistsOneHalleluja 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But in the end the three all get trashed by a military drone.

    • @jullienflight
      @jullienflight 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      TwoFistsOneHalleluja Don't put your luck in robots mate no system is perfect, The most technological advanced military doesn't always win wars...remember the Vietnam War America was defeated by a bunch of 108ib 5ft 2in tall Viet-Kong gorilla solders armed with AK-47 made 20 years before the war and Bamboo Booby-traps. American troops were not defeated on the battlefield per-say but they didn't had to be.

    • @nehorlavazapalka
      @nehorlavazapalka 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      absolute nonsense

  • @omnianti0
    @omnianti0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    none can buy anything after watching such video its like tecno parade lights in the eyes

  • @TheFreakyJhonny
    @TheFreakyJhonny 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    cant remember, I wrote it 5 months ago......
    and i dont know why we need artilleryguns
    can someone explain it to me?

    • @ole-thorolffeldheim3187
      @ole-thorolffeldheim3187 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your question is irritating.
      Artillery is also a part of divisions and builds together with other forces a tactical combat unit. Since ww2 we all knew about the effects of army’s who build tactical combat units - it began with Blitz Krieg... and of corse nowadays we got units with mech infantry tank, main battle tanks, mobile artillery tanks, anti aircraft tanks, multiple rocke be ts launch tanks, combined with aircraft’s, helicopters, better radio stations, commando stations, computers and so on...

    • @TheFreakyJhonny
      @TheFreakyJhonny 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@ole-thorolffeldheim3187 dude, why would you even reply to an 8 year old comment?

  • @cuddlepaws4423
    @cuddlepaws4423 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looked like a car advert .

  • @tankerjoe
    @tankerjoe 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hmmm so they solved the problem of a vulnerable turret crew by putting them in a cab with windows-it also seems like 30 rounds isn't enough

  • @tasman006
    @tasman006 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cool Auto loader system and only two crewman.

  • @budimon3
    @budimon3 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    fire support

  • @Herofromzer0
    @Herofromzer0 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Too much electronic and moving part in loading mechanism, too much thing could go wrong in the heat of fight. Put one more crew to manual load but eliminate half of the hassle. İ think Germans won't get good lesson in ww2 too complicated tanks always find a way to break down when you needed.

    • @Zeroczar
      @Zeroczar 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It shouldn't be in a fight as someone else said it should be 40km away from the fight.

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Zeroczar leave it be he doest know the difference between a self propelled gun and a TANK

    • @Herofromzer0
      @Herofromzer0 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually i know the difference between tank and obus . Today 40 km distance is not to much for fast moving mobile armies.

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      halit özbaşlı i agree but todays inteligance stuff also is upgradet and i dont think theyll just leave it firing whilöe a army is moving up.
      I mean ull somehow know something is going wrong and that the enemys are moving up and i bet that thing can outrun an army that has to check buildings etc. on its way.

    • @pureblood4386
      @pureblood4386 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      halit özbaşlı Just another "ooooooooooh i want one of those" videos.

  • @TwoFistsOneHalleluja
    @TwoFistsOneHalleluja 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems too heavy and to expensive for artillery.
    Pretty usefull when you are going at war with a neighbor i guess but how can you transport that heavy thing to a distant battlefield overseas? You put it on a boat and then wait for 2 months until it arrives?

    • @Omar-li5db
      @Omar-li5db 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      TwoFistsOneHalleluja it's an artillery piece, doesn't really need to move a lot.

  • @terryteed1903
    @terryteed1903 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's built on an old tracked rapier chassis we had in the 80s ffs

  • @Jedi2155
    @Jedi2155 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    This thing basically looks like a ship turret tacked onto a truck. A giant silhouette, little to no armor, and a chassis that cannot support the recoil cannot possibly look good. A giant gaping target for armor killers.

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      this shouldnt be at the front it should be like 40-50 km behinde the front ... it u can fire a rpg that far ... ur a human with superpowers!!

    • @ruthlessdeath123
      @ruthlessdeath123 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      well the germans tried to mount it on a ship cause the gun is bigger then a ships cannon but obivously it failed ... badly

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ruthlessdeath123 what failed ... did the ship role over XD ???

    • @ruthlessdeath123
      @ruthlessdeath123 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I dont know i got a friend in the german army he said the systems of the cannon didnt match the ships something like that i dunno seeing the power of that gun
      to be honest.... it wouldnt suprise me if it actually would roll over

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ruthlessdeath123 lol

  • @edwinfelix2419
    @edwinfelix2419 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thats slowest responding touchscreen ever

  • @EddieLeal
    @EddieLeal 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can i get a civilian job testing all of this fun equipment? Some people have all of the fun! :(

  • @homfri111
    @homfri111 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    the ammo magazine = a vending machine for death

  • @jullienflight
    @jullienflight 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG the overhead lights in the tunnel are very Annoying- on and off, on and off, on and off, on and off, very unnecessary, but that aside very nice looking weapon system!

  • @miodragjovanic6514
    @miodragjovanic6514 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    good

  • @bruneauandreas564
    @bruneauandreas564 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    from my point of view the panzerhaubitze 2000 is better and the best self propelled howitzer in the world

    • @Thunderbolt747
      @Thunderbolt747 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's just a German paladin, its not that great. There are many better arty pieces than the 2000, like the CAESAR or the Archer.

    • @jonny2954
      @jonny2954 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      First, it's definitely not a "german paladin" second, considering range and rounds per minute it IS the best howitzer in the world. However the DONAR has almost similar capabilities, just a smaller ammo stock (still bigger than of most other howitzers).

    • @devonshackelford2585
      @devonshackelford2585 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The pzh2000 is considered third best according to the unsc and second is donar first is fh77 archer

    • @05017351
      @05017351 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      From my point of view the Jedi are evil!

    • @lordemarsh6804
      @lordemarsh6804 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      yup true..

  • @sturgeonslaw9287
    @sturgeonslaw9287 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    What the hell is this, an ad for a new Kia SUV?

  • @starskyhutch438
    @starskyhutch438 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 31.5 tons it is about as heavy as a M-1 or a Leopard tank that have more shells but less range.

    • @joezzzify
      @joezzzify 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Mike old tymer No. No. You are wrong. By far

    • @rocs5649
      @rocs5649 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      starsky hutch do you know how heavy the m1 or leopard is? if this is 31 tons then it twice lighter than those two. m1=60+ tons idiot

  • @jurijknafelj1931
    @jurijknafelj1931 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    donar is the westgermanian name of thor

  • @tembot6363
    @tembot6363 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Recoil will wreck that platform firing sideways....... Recoil too much for that gun platform

  • @wor53lg50
    @wor53lg50 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "No disassemble"...."yo Bozo's, its me jonnie number 5 and im pleased to see you"..../Gotta say though it looks better than the weoponised ugs boot with wheels...

  • @JanMessersmith
    @JanMessersmith 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    One nicely placed RPG and it's toast. It needs a battalion of infantry and a couple of attack helicopters just to protect it. If a weapon is too dangerous and too valuable a target, it will be attacked first.

    • @hildemel
      @hildemel 10 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It is artillery. If enemy troops are close enough to attack it then something has gone terribly wrong.

    • @1HOUSEMD
      @1HOUSEMD 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      hildemel
      Nicely said :)

  • @picullierxebec
    @picullierxebec 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like the 88
    flak truck

  • @nlo114
    @nlo114 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Add CD autochanger / MP3 option pack 600 Euros

  • @VolgaSura
    @VolgaSura 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Слишком сложный механизм заряжения

    • @ИИванов-ь6с
      @ИИванов-ь6с 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Такая же система заряжания к в танках Т-72 и выше. В чем проблема-то?

  • @bestamerica
    @bestamerica 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    '
    very beautifully coool vehicle,,,
    half blizzard MRLS and half howitzer TANK,,,
    america can make it many arms weapons

  • @rat_king-
    @rat_king- 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you have a small turret problem, so the chassis becomes the recoil spade.... 5:23
    Holy god, why do we need so many components? more to fail.... well it is german...

  • @greinert5124
    @greinert5124 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ist just for Export

  • @Gurkengraeber11
    @Gurkengraeber11 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    also wenn ich ein psychopatischer wüstenprinz wäre, würde ich mal meine halbvesrchleierte frau damit fahren lassen.

  • @dmitri2011
    @dmitri2011 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Narrow chassis with narrow tracks. Wheeled version would be at least lighter and cheaper. But this? At 31.5 tons its not much lighter than Russian Msta (42t), with incomparably lower mobility. This is not an off-road vehicle. Also badly engineered auto-loader. Wikipedia says rate of fire is up to 4 shots/minute. For comparison, Msta is 6-8 (10 for new modification). In short, pretty bad product.

    • @TheCleber96
      @TheCleber96 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "Military Today" says its 6rpm wich will be upgraded to 8rpm in future variants. The Donar needs 2 crew members while Msta needs 5. Also its firnig range is 40km while Msta has only 28. and in terms of mobility both have max. speed of 60km/h. So I personally woulndt call it a bad product ;)

    • @dmitri2011
      @dmitri2011 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      By mobility I meant not speed, but cross country mobility. Vehicle based on truck can never compete with one based on the tank. If its really 6, it makes it ok product. There is 155mm variant of Msta with 40km range for export and 152mm with 40 km is offered for Russian army.

    • @TheCleber96
      @TheCleber96 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dmitri Savine The Donar dosent look like a offroad vehicle indeed ;) But with the South African VLAP the Donar can fire up to 56km. Do you know if the Msta is also capable of firing in MRSI? The 2S19M Variant is fitted with computerized fire control system just like the Donar so it should be able to. The 2S35 Koalitsija-SV will be supperior of course :D

    • @dmitri2011
      @dmitri2011 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, Msta can fire MRSI. About VLAP, it all depends on projectile. New variants of Msta have 30km for regular rounds. This is more important, since in any war most rounds will be cheap iron rounds. Btw, this SA thing also seems way better than DONAR. (Though very over weighted for wheeled gun).

    • @Zeroczar
      @Zeroczar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dmitri Savine Germans are designing a wheeled SPG look up Boxer AGM.

  • @cqluke
    @cqluke 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Music is annoying, couldn't finish it.

  • @TheFightingSheep
    @TheFightingSheep 10 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Awesome machine for shows and demos, German engineering is the best. Can't take it to Russia with those narrow tracks though, I guess they didn't learn their lesson.

    • @wizard380
      @wizard380 10 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      wide of the traks depend on weight...i guess you never learned any type of lesson

    • @TheFightingSheep
      @TheFightingSheep 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      robert istrate The width of tracks depends on weight? In Europe maybe - in Russia it depends on mud more then anything. It's a history lesson, not an engineering lesson that I was talking about.

    • @floatsomboy
      @floatsomboy 10 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      At 31.5 ton as per the video (thanks Dmitri for correcting me on the weight) I doubt it exert any more ground pressure the the average human. If wide track are every thing then why is there an awful lot of Russian tracked AFV's, APC' and SPG' with narrow tracks? The BMP's spring to mind.

    • @rosso4122
      @rosso4122 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... thw thing is ... todays weatherstuff and todays gps was better than the one in ww2 ( they didnt have it ). I dont think they would drive over soooo muddy fields in that thing if a road is like km further away ( i man that thing can shoot like 40km 3 km further away dontmatter all to much )

    • @mbr5742
      @mbr5742 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      GD is not german, they use some PzH 2000 components in this. If you want to fight in Russia - take the original PzH 2000, that has wide tracks, armor and a special mode for self defence through direct fire. Supercharge 8 and a 155mm can ruin the day for bears

  • @seemslegit6203
    @seemslegit6203 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, 10s reload when you have a fucking auto loader? What kind of bullshit is that

  • @SiggiNebel
    @SiggiNebel 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    A rather obscene advertising.

  • @donplaquetin2003
    @donplaquetin2003 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    No se le veo debilidades al en el frente un misilazo y puedo asegurar que ese cañón queda inhabitable

  • @kanal756
    @kanal756 ปีที่แล้ว

    Altay 2 yeni versiyonu insansız paletli zırhlı araç üzerine fırtına 3 155.52 kalibre obus kulesini insansız versiyonu insansız kulesini entegre ettim tasarım olarak yaptim 35mm 8namlulu stamp olarak entegre ettim

  • @seemslegit6203
    @seemslegit6203 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    30 rounds is fuck all

  • @анатолийматышев
    @анатолийматышев 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    а вспомнил -мини донар!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @alfatihrohman3398
    @alfatihrohman3398 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Indonesia harus beli donar 200

  • @mrNks97
    @mrNks97 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    and its just germany that builds the "useless" stuff

  • @blackburnmichelson6189
    @blackburnmichelson6189 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holly shit i thing it is german engineering

  • @Alpha2-h9w
    @Alpha2-h9w 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    this thing is so out of balance look at it modern warfare is done by wheeled artillery not but tracked ad it looks so easy to kill this thing got nothing on the nora-b52 or the archer system

  • @principae122
    @principae122 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    the music is very bad!!!!

  • @ParallaxVue
    @ParallaxVue 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video does not do a good job marketing this weapon system. It's much too long with way too much fluff.

  • @ELFTeka
    @ELFTeka 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Слабая попытка...

  • @johannesdolch
    @johannesdolch 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Replace accurate information with shitty music, great choice.

  • @ceticoamador7567
    @ceticoamador7567 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    O veículo quase vira com o disparo! Kkkkk

  • @ProximaHydra
    @ProximaHydra 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    бабла немерено вот и пичкают любую пуколку кучей роботов и банкоматов)

  • @ShashankRaina992
    @ShashankRaina992 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    ALREADY SENT 400 TO AFGHANISTAN.

  • @vanyarys1052
    @vanyarys1052 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    ЧЕСТНО ! Ролик класс ! реклама все ж,а САУ отстой !

  • @CoolSoju005
    @CoolSoju005 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    unstable

  • @terminator5285
    @terminator5285 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    coll idea be made for this vehylice cluster bullets whats can destroy masive emeny forces in one shot hau 40 emeny tanks go attack and horwittzer shot cluster bullet one shot can destroy 40 tanks here criss stone

  • @mazas1550
    @mazas1550 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks too heawy

    • @JustinKoenigSilica
      @JustinKoenigSilica 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's an SPG. it doesn't move much, it has 40km range.

  • @nurahmad5807
    @nurahmad5807 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    iki cangih

  • @TheBic4
    @TheBic4 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    North Korean 170mm koksan is better and its 30 years old at least.

  • @HEMI345S
    @HEMI345S 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a piece of junk, it almost tips over when firing on the sides 😂😂😂

  • @juhmachado1704
    @juhmachado1704 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    que!!! os comentarios estao engles esse filme e uma coisa mmuuuiittoo chata

  • @glsblink
    @glsblink 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    it also be nice can point blank shoot heheheheheheheheh
    e

  • @АндрейМакаров-у8п
    @АндрейМакаров-у8п 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Помойка. Нулевая пригодность