She's not paid to know better. But you know who is?? The people who are 100% responsible. The county code enforcement folks who get paychecks, benefits, retirement, etc. And the "boat club" owner. To charge $$$ to let occupancy inside that corrugated tin metal building right next to a thoroughfare where high speeds are obviously possible. Concrete abutments could have saved those children's lives. About 2k in labor and materials at the most to surround the parking lot or building. The county gets paid to know better. Now hundreds of thousands have to be paid out for what anyone can see if they thought about it. Code should have never allowed that death trap to hold and cater events. Poor family, they were let down.
If she only had one glass of wine then why TF is her excuse, not BS "I had a seizure" without any evidence. ONE glass of wine does not result in "initial breath test showed Chidester’s blood-alcohol level was “well above” the legal limit". She doesn't show a shred of remorse. She IS a danger to everyone.
Why was she driving if she had "leg seizures" also if she hadn't been DOG DRUNK! she could have turned the wheel if it was just her legs! And WHY is this creature out of jail? I guess the judge wants more children hurt!!!
Yes there totally should have been cement abutments surrounding a corrugated metal building that held events for people. When I first heard the story I could hardly believe the county or township didn't have code requirements. That's what code is for, code enforcement as to look at all these possibilities. That's literally what it's for. Look around at cities and other places, most everything has cement abutments and metal poles sunk in the ground to prevent cars from plowing into buildings. The idea was probably invented in the late 1920's 's when automobiles started having the capability for higher speeds.
Blaming the building design is TRUTH. People NEVER "do the right thing always" but the GOVERNMENT, who gets paid to hold building owners "To CODE" IS TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE. How much would concrete abutments surrounding the parking lot have cost ?? I estimate 2k in concrete and labor would have save the 3 lives lost. Do people ALWAYS do the right thing ?? NO.... Only a FOOL would rely on that. However the govt. that taxes us and CONTROLS us (really the people who live cushy lives collecting paychecks and retirement that make up the "govt." Are literally PAID TO KNOW BETTER. HOW MUCH $$ IN "FIRST RESPONDERS?? POLICE?? "CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES " HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. HOW MUCH FOR THE CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED BY CODE. 2K in concrete and labor at best could have saved three lives. But NO .....WE WOULD RATHER SIT BACK AND BLAME THE WOMEN AS A DEVIL..... BUT Who PROFITED??? THE GOVT. WITH TAX REVENUE AND THE DAMN BAR WHO SOLD THE LIQUOR WITHOUT EVER A THOUGHT OF PROVIDING RIDES TO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE THERE ...TO DRINK !!!!! GO FIGURE THAT DEATH AND MAYHEM OCCURED... WOW WHO WOULD HAVE EVER THOUGHT??? NO IM NOT THE SHARPEST TOOL IN THE SHED..... BUT IM NOT PAID TO BE.. HOWEVER THE HE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT WHO WERE IGNORANT TO THE FACT THAT A DAMN DEATH TRAP OF A THIN CORRUGATED TIN BUILDING NEXT TO A ROAD WHERE THEY ALLOWED EVENTS AND HUMAN OCCUPANCY....GEEEEZE ??? WHO WOULD EVER THINK A CAR COULD GO PLOWING THROUGH PRACTICALLY OUT THE OTHER END ??? ME AND IM NOT ALL THAT SMART....BUT ITS FREAKING OBVIOUS TO ME THAT CODE SHOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED THAT TO BE. ... DUH...... THATS WHY YOU PUT CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT DONT COST SHIT UP AROUND A DAMN PARKING LOT.... IT COULD HAVE SAVED 3 FREAKING LIVES.... NOW THE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO PAY ALL THOSE HERO FIRST RESPONDERS..... AND THE CUSHY LIVES CODE PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T GET BLAMED UNTIL THE DAMED LAWYER HAD TO POINT OUT THE REAL PROBLEM... HELL YEAH THE BAR OWNERS AND "BOAT CLUB" OWNERS SHOULD BE SUED. THEY GET PAID TO KNOW BETTER.... AND NOW ANY OF YOU ARE READING THIS KNOW BETTER. ANY BUILDING NEXT TO DAMN ROAD OUGHT TO HAVE CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT COST JACK SHIT COMPARED TO UN UNREPLACEABLE HUMAN LIFE SHOULD BE THERE TO PROTECT AN OBVIOUS CASE OF MAYHEM FROM HAPPENING. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN SOMEWHERE ELSE TOO. I TIL BAR OWNERS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT PEOPLE ARE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THEY GET PAID FOR.
I don’t see how the boat club could possibly be liable who would think a car driven by a drunk person would plow into the wall of the boat club am I missing something I should have seen ⁉️ Can they prove she had a medical emergency how can she have a medical emergency when she backed into a car definitely not in her way and then know to put the car in drive and continue driving and then slam into the boat club ⁉️ The medical emergency would have had to start when she backed her car into the car that wasn’t in her way ‼️ I don’t believe she had any medical emergency and how many drink’s did she have before she went into the bar and had one glass of wine if that’s even true ⁉️⁉️
I understand the victims choice in sueing the owners of that "boat club". That building should have had concrete abutments surrounding the parking lot and perimeter. County code should never have allowed the owner to hold or cater to events inside a building like that next to a thoroughfare with no protection. Its literally the reason for having codes. The building was made of one thin layer of corrugated metal sitting next to an area where high speed is possible. People dont always do the right thing ( like bartenders) and you can and should expect a certain percent to never do the right thing. Thats what building, occupancy codes are literally in existence for. Sincere condolences to that poor family. They were let down on many levels.
She showed zero remorse in her interview. She blames it on seizures but she was DRUNK. if you have a seizure disorder you are not supposed to drink alcohol. She just doesnt care.
rest in peace dear sweet angels god bless family members the true victims are the kids the people hurt .the defendant was running from the scene of hitting a truck and fence and the boat club and vernas knew her as the town lush shes not the victim
Lol I think everyone who ain’t from here needs to learn some lingo lol here we go Pointe Aux Paeux rd it’s not Pointe Aux Pox rd lol Nadeau rd is not Nadue lol La Pleasants rd is not La Plosont 😅
The defense was very unprofessional, I get it she is entitled by Miranda to have legal council paid for or pay out for your own ok yes alright, what kind of lawyer would actually argue with the victims families defending her actions they were on zoom , stick to the facts yes the families are gonna be upset and shout out , it’s natural but to literally argue the defense with families ? That judge should have intervened and said sir eyes up here not on zoom
That woman is 100% to blame. She is a murderer. It was all of her poor choices that caused her to drive.
She's not paid to know better. But you know who is?? The people who are 100% responsible. The county code enforcement folks who get paychecks, benefits, retirement, etc. And the "boat club" owner.
To charge $$$ to let occupancy inside that corrugated tin metal building right next to a thoroughfare where high speeds are obviously possible.
Concrete abutments could have saved those children's lives. About 2k in labor and materials at the most to surround the parking lot or building.
The county gets paid to know better. Now hundreds of thousands have to be paid out for what anyone can see if they thought about it. Code should have never allowed that death trap to hold and cater events. Poor family, they were let down.
SUE her out of her home; everthing ~ then she wont have all that money to defend driving 3x over the limit..
Those beautiful children, rest in peace angels 😢❤ 🕊️ 🙏🏽
If she only had one glass of wine then why TF is her excuse, not BS "I had a seizure" without any evidence. ONE glass of wine does not result in "initial breath test showed Chidester’s blood-alcohol level was “well above” the legal limit". She doesn't show a shred of remorse. She IS a danger to everyone.
Im betting she had alcohol before she got to the bar
Even with the alcohol level if she has seizures she should never be driving. This was awful and killed 2 very young children plus all the injured.
She never even hit the brakes !!! She belongs in jail!!! Who cares about her “ perfect driving record” !!!
A kids party is literally the worst possible thing to hit!
Why was she driving if she had "leg seizures" also if she hadn't been DOG DRUNK! she could have turned the wheel if it was just her legs! And WHY is this creature out of jail? I guess the judge wants more children hurt!!!
Oh wow, the building is the blame??? Not her drinking and driving?? Wow.
That building jumped in front of her car while she was enjoying a single glass of wine.
Blaming the design of the building is wild!
Yes there totally should have been cement abutments surrounding a corrugated metal building that held events for people. When I first heard the story I could hardly believe the county or township didn't have code requirements. That's what code is for, code enforcement as to look at all these possibilities. That's literally what it's for. Look around at cities and other places, most everything has cement abutments and metal poles sunk in the ground to prevent cars from plowing into buildings. The idea was probably invented in the late 1920's 's when automobiles started having the capability for higher speeds.
Blaming the building design is TRUTH. People NEVER "do the right thing always" but the GOVERNMENT, who gets paid to hold building owners "To CODE" IS TOTALLY RESPONSIBLE.
How much would concrete abutments surrounding the parking lot have cost ??
I estimate 2k in concrete and labor would have save the 3 lives lost.
Do people ALWAYS do the right thing ?? NO.... Only a FOOL would rely on that. However the govt. that taxes us and CONTROLS us (really the people who live cushy lives collecting paychecks and retirement that make up the "govt." Are literally PAID TO KNOW BETTER.
HOW MUCH $$ IN "FIRST RESPONDERS?? POLICE?? "CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES " HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS.
HOW MUCH FOR THE CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED BY CODE. 2K in concrete and labor at best could have saved three lives.
But NO .....WE WOULD RATHER SIT BACK AND BLAME THE WOMEN AS A DEVIL..... BUT Who PROFITED??? THE GOVT. WITH TAX REVENUE AND THE DAMN BAR WHO SOLD THE LIQUOR WITHOUT EVER A THOUGHT OF PROVIDING RIDES TO CUSTOMERS WHO ARE THERE ...TO DRINK !!!!! GO FIGURE THAT DEATH AND MAYHEM OCCURED... WOW WHO WOULD HAVE EVER THOUGHT???
NO IM NOT THE SHARPEST TOOL IN THE SHED..... BUT IM NOT PAID TO BE..
HOWEVER THE HE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT WHO WERE IGNORANT TO THE FACT THAT A DAMN DEATH TRAP OF A THIN CORRUGATED TIN BUILDING NEXT TO A ROAD WHERE THEY ALLOWED EVENTS AND HUMAN OCCUPANCY....GEEEEZE ??? WHO WOULD EVER THINK A CAR COULD GO PLOWING THROUGH PRACTICALLY OUT THE OTHER END ??? ME AND IM NOT ALL THAT SMART....BUT ITS FREAKING OBVIOUS TO ME THAT CODE SHOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED THAT TO BE. ... DUH...... THATS WHY YOU PUT CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT DONT COST SHIT UP AROUND A DAMN PARKING LOT.... IT COULD HAVE SAVED 3 FREAKING LIVES.... NOW THE TAXPAYERS HAVE TO PAY ALL THOSE HERO FIRST RESPONDERS..... AND THE CUSHY LIVES CODE PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T GET BLAMED UNTIL THE DAMED LAWYER HAD TO POINT OUT THE REAL PROBLEM... HELL YEAH THE BAR OWNERS AND "BOAT CLUB" OWNERS SHOULD BE SUED. THEY GET PAID TO KNOW BETTER.... AND NOW ANY OF YOU ARE READING THIS KNOW BETTER. ANY BUILDING NEXT TO DAMN ROAD OUGHT TO HAVE CONCRETE ABUTMENTS THAT COST JACK SHIT COMPARED TO UN UNREPLACEABLE HUMAN LIFE SHOULD BE THERE TO PROTECT AN OBVIOUS CASE OF MAYHEM FROM HAPPENING. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN SOMEWHERE ELSE TOO. I TIL BAR OWNERS AND CODE ENFORCEMENT PEOPLE ARE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THEY GET PAID FOR.
The boat club and vernas shouldn't be involved in the law suit
I don’t see how the boat club could possibly be liable who would think a car driven by a drunk person would plow into the wall of the boat club am I missing something I should have seen ⁉️ Can they prove she had a medical emergency how can she have a medical emergency when she backed into a car definitely not in her way and then know to put the car in drive and continue driving and then slam into the boat club ⁉️ The medical emergency would have had to start when she backed her car into the car that wasn’t in her way ‼️ I don’t believe she had any medical emergency and how many drink’s did she have before she went into the bar and had one glass of wine if that’s even true ⁉️⁉️
Why isn’t she under the jail yet?
To me imo it doesn’t make sense to sue the boat club and why sue her insurance company?
I understand the victims choice in sueing the owners of that "boat club". That building should have had concrete abutments surrounding the parking lot and perimeter. County code should never have allowed the owner to hold or cater to events inside a building like that next to a thoroughfare with no protection.
Its literally the reason for having codes. The building was made of one thin layer of corrugated metal sitting next to an area where high speed is possible. People dont always do the right thing ( like bartenders) and you can and should expect a certain percent to never do the right thing. Thats what building, occupancy codes are literally in existence for. Sincere condolences to that poor family. They were let down on many levels.
She showed zero remorse in her interview. She blames it on seizures but she was DRUNK. if you have a seizure disorder you are not supposed to drink alcohol. She just doesnt care.
It's time we address this vehicle violence.
She’s a liar.
rest in peace dear sweet angels god bless family members the true victims are the kids the people hurt .the defendant was running from the scene of hitting a truck and fence and the boat club and vernas knew her as the town lush shes not the victim
Please teach that lawyer how to say “Monroe”.
Lol I think everyone who ain’t from here needs to learn some lingo lol here we go
Pointe Aux Paeux rd it’s not Pointe Aux Pox rd lol
Nadeau rd is not Nadue lol
La Pleasants rd is not La Plosont
😅
The defense was very unprofessional, I get it she is entitled by Miranda to have legal council paid for or pay out for your own ok yes alright, what kind of lawyer would actually argue with the victims families defending her actions they were on zoom , stick to the facts yes the families are gonna be upset and shout out , it’s natural but to literally argue the defense with families ? That judge should have intervened and said sir eyes up here not on zoom
All I keep saying is, OMG!! 😥😥😥
Town drunk!
0:44 The woman wasn’t “sitting in awe.” She was in shock, possibly injured, you goofball.
She blew a .17. She was wasted.
Having your birthday be the date of death for your friends... ooooh
Community advocate Network got a hold of a bunch of security videos, before that accident she had another one.
1L of wine