Comparison 1/18 AUTOart vs. Kyosho Lamborghini Countach | Scale Diecast Model Car

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
  • Comparison between AUTOart and Kyosho Lamborghini Countach. Enjoy!
    AUTOart is red and Kyosho is baby blue.
    BTW: Winner of the giveaway has been picked and contacted via IG. Congratulations!
    Follow me on Instagram: / thediecastfanatic
    Instrumental produced by getzh: / sharetrb
    Don't forget to subscribe for upcoming reviews of other model cars!

ความคิดเห็น • 63

  • @galptube211
    @galptube211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    They're both great replicas, at some points each of them have more accurate details than the other. Overall, I'd say AutoArt wins, but Kyosho did it quite well. :-)

  • @butterfliesandtape
    @butterfliesandtape 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    For what it's worth, the autoart appears closer overall to the original. EG lights, steering column angle, exhaust. The proportions of the body of the autoart is closer to the original I'd say as well. I think where the Kyosho beats it is in its overall "look". I'd suggest it's just like the tamiya Koenig countach, in as much as it looks like it's a bit more jacked/pumped! Look at the ride height and the front air dam as examples. Great vid dude!!!!

  • @BFDdrives
    @BFDdrives 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Both models are very good in details and quality. It also looks that when AutoArt is failing at a detail then you can find it as well at Kyosho - so a giving and take and overall both die-cast models are outstanding!

    • @isaacsrandomvideos667
      @isaacsrandomvideos667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What details are worse on the AutoArt? I can’t see any but the steering wheel and dash location

    • @BFDdrives
      @BFDdrives 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@isaacsrandomvideos667 headlights and indicators are looking better on the Kyosho but the fog lights and the little airflow grill for the brakes is better on the Aa. Pattern on the tail lights are looking better at the Aa but the reflector should be red like at the Kyosho model. I agree on the steering wheel and dash location. Both are great models. So it is just a decision on a few details about what is looking better for you. Overall I'd say the AUTOart is better - especially when looking into the engine bay. I'm not even sure if the engine in the Kyosho is from a real one - at least I can't find a picture of one that is looking like the one of Kyosho. The lines on the body are looking sharper on the Kyosho - probably they're using a thinner layered paint. Well, both are good models - at the end it is the personal demand on particular details and of course the wallet.

    • @isaacsrandomvideos667
      @isaacsrandomvideos667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      BFD drives I’d pick AutoArt anyday, but my wallet is always been spent on thousands of 1960s hotwheels, 1950s dinkys, 1970s corgis and 1950s-80s matchboxes

  • @David22Lee
    @David22Lee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Autoart wins in terms of detail, but the Kyosho has a better stance and the lines are stronger/sharper like the real countach. Autoart's overall contour and lines are a little soft.

    • @isaacsrandomvideos667
      @isaacsrandomvideos667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think autoarts lines are better

    • @paulthomson9014
      @paulthomson9014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Autoart more correct than kyosho , the kyosho roofline is all wrong . However I actually prefer the kyosho it gives it a meaner stance

  • @gult3kinphotography
    @gult3kinphotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    best AA

  • @donquixote2072
    @donquixote2072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In a vacuum the kyosho looks fantastic, however side by side; I have to give it to autoart, it appears far more accurate to the shape of actual car. Given the opportunity, I'd love to own either of these models.

  • @aroned3737
    @aroned3737 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    And I can’t afford neither

  • @shahlegno5890
    @shahlegno5890 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The Engine part is the really makes the Big different

  • @VC_27
    @VC_27 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Six of one and half a dozen of the other. Great comparison done. I am trying to restore a 1/24 Burago model which has seen better days and this video will be very helpful. Thank you.

  • @trevorstevens2889
    @trevorstevens2889 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a great video series for those of us trying to make difficult buying decisions.

  • @DesigntodesireSR
    @DesigntodesireSR ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Autoart for sure(more realistic one)!!!
    But kyosho is more robust and lowered ❤❤❤

  • @ChristoFourie-jy1xd
    @ChristoFourie-jy1xd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great comparing these two.

  • @luxuryelegance7319
    @luxuryelegance7319 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You reached a thousand subs man!! Im happy for you!! Good luck to everyone that has entered the giveaway!

    • @TheDiecastFanatic
      @TheDiecastFanatic  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LUXURY & ELEGANCE thank you. However the giveaway is over already ;)

    • @luxuryelegance7319
      @luxuryelegance7319 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Diecast Fanatic oh 😂😂

  • @luke4pres
    @luke4pres 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Beat is dope

  • @bluetred353
    @bluetred353 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sicuramente AA ha dettagli in più ma sono comunque modelli differenti: 5000S vs 5000 QV

  • @josephcabrera6396
    @josephcabrera6396 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    looks like AUTOart's detail is more refined

  • @thekarga
    @thekarga 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AUTO ART is at another level...

  • @CarsWithHNK
    @CarsWithHNK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They are both superb models I love kyosho models but I think AUTOart may just edge it between these two 👍

  • @simontemplar1566
    @simontemplar1566 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Autoart!

  • @JHHobby
    @JHHobby 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice review~ love your videos too!

    • @TheDiecastFanatic
      @TheDiecastFanatic  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      JH-Hobby thank you! Please subscribe if you haven’t already. Many more videos to come 💪😊

  • @rachmadsuhartono
    @rachmadsuhartono ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Autoart looks better for me here

  • @H_A_D
    @H_A_D 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AutoArt is truly an art

  • @gioviecelli
    @gioviecelli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer kyosho! Autoart have more qualitity, Autoart is more accurate with dimensions.... BUT kyosho its more agressive, more beautifull, more lower. Have more visual impact! i prefer countach kyosho!

    • @MannoulaZ
      @MannoulaZ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Qualility?

  • @szymonjozwiak8570
    @szymonjozwiak8570 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Auto art wins

  • @Dcheart1
    @Dcheart1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Autoart because of the door mechanism

  • @JoseSanchez-rw2gn
    @JoseSanchez-rw2gn ปีที่แล้ว

    Hay un pequeño error en la comparación, son versiones diferentes. El Kyosho es el Lamborghini Countach LP500 S.
    El Autoart es el Lamborghini Countach 5000 S.

  • @edstud1
    @edstud1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Autoart seems a little more refined, but both are nice!

  • @tacfoley4443
    @tacfoley4443 ปีที่แล้ว

    The AUTOart engine bay is in a completely different league compared to that of the Kyosho model - for that alone it's a no-brainer which one I'd be spending a lot of money on...

  • @DesigntodesireSR
    @DesigntodesireSR 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Autoart for quality build and kyosho for playability

  • @hugohc4827
    @hugohc4827 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelente comparativa, AA se ve bastante mejor.

  • @lazerwolfdiecast
    @lazerwolfdiecast 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks for trying to destroy my speakers

  • @user-jd8po2jc6b
    @user-jd8po2jc6b 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Autoart win😊

  • @SNKCreativity
    @SNKCreativity ปีที่แล้ว

    моя любимая модель

  • @isaacsrandomvideos667
    @isaacsrandomvideos667 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AutoArt has much much cleaner lines

  • @topgun57572000
    @topgun57572000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    it does look like autoart is closer looking to the real car u can drive.

  • @EHMotors69
    @EHMotors69 หลายเดือนก่อน

    autoart is countach 5000s and kyosho is 5000 qv

  • @ronsmusclecardiecast
    @ronsmusclecardiecast 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awsome comparison both are great but I am going with AA. I do a lot of content on rare 1/64 Muscle cars mainly Mopars and some jdm and truck stuff maybe you might want to check it out and we can trade subs. Thanks for sharing

  • @LarsEvanJ
    @LarsEvanJ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think that both of these looks wrong from the side view.

  • @stoppet3774
    @stoppet3774 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Benny jamz

  • @metfreak100
    @metfreak100 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    LoL autoart ANYDAY

  • @wildychan824
    @wildychan824 ปีที่แล้ว

    Both are not the accurate models, especially on gaps between fender and wheel. But Kyosho is going wrongs more than AutoArt.

  • @rob.m3647
    @rob.m3647 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The front end is wrong on the kyosho.

    • @paulthomson9709
      @paulthomson9709 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The shape of the kyosho is all wrong . But somehow I prefer it over the autoart , its a meaner stance on it . Like the original low body countachs . A lot of kyosho ferraris have very wrong shapes . F40 being the most noticeable.

    • @gioviecelli
      @gioviecelli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@paulthomson9709 i agre! autoart have best proportions and lines. The shape of the kyosho is wrong in dimensions.. but kyosho is more agressive, beautifull, lower and loks better!!!

  • @ungurdani8346
    @ungurdani8346 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ... Salut my friend super car super video subscribe subscribe

    • @ungurdani8346
      @ungurdani8346 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks my friend subscribe subscribe ...

  • @benz12aquin
    @benz12aquin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Autoart much more realistic detailing hands-down

  • @bigben8057
    @bigben8057 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Autoart better 😊

  • @abbiravindhran8424
    @abbiravindhran8424 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Kyosho looks like maisto

  • @joec8107
    @joec8107 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aa is dead now

  • @electricbassist8009
    @electricbassist8009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kyosho sucks! 😆