This is why the PC version is better. I've played both and the xbox version feels very cut down. Like every ship shown here has the super ship rating yet all are tier 10 on PC. Why wargaming made it different on Xbox I don't know.
Napoli and Stalingrad are the most underrated cruisers at LT. Nearly impossible to kill, insane accuracy 90% of the time. Napoli is crazy maneuverable with OP concealment stats, plus useful SAP secondaries. Stalingrad is the only cruiser where I can citadel a Montana from 17km
I always hated the destroyers but I've been watching different clips on how to play them well. I get your point on finding them boring when you play them the way you should. I realized that you get points for the damage caused when you are spotting so that helped me start to embrace them more. I would run in to cap, do a J hook to face out and a cruiser would pop radar and the entire team would fire. Even with facing out, one shot seemed to shut down my engines and then I would get slaughtered so I had to learn what cruisers had radar and try to stay clear of that range. I've not even been playing 6 months so I'm in awe at how much some of you guys know about all the different ships in the game. My first Bureau projects should complete in the next week or 2. I'm starting with the Yamato and Z-52 but I'll use your guide on the next picks.
Thank you for setting me straight. I was doing Worcester and switched over to Napoli and then from Napoli to Alaska but now thanks to what you said, and I know it’s true, back to Worcester. Appreciate you. 😎
Worcester is brain dead good. Like you can play while blackout drunk and drop 200k. Ship turns on a dime so it damn near can be hit and still has a fantastic bow. Also the guns fire nearly constantly and have nutty fire chance.
I am so glad you said what you said about Montana, cause I am only 2 of 5 into my first segment on that ship. I liked Montana on PC and was thinking it was same here. Glad I didn't wast my time. I am switching over to Yamata. Thank you for the videos
Good Video sir thank you...I don't have lots of time to play so these ships will probably be many years out for me...personally I dig the Gearing....she plays just like her sisters and the learning curve is much smaller...keep up the great work..
Alaska and kaba are probably my 2 favourite legendary ships. Alaska on 14 second reload is good for hunting dds , deleting cruisers and chunking bbs. Kaba is a perfect dd hunter killer for me.
My first DD was the Shimi, I still enjoy playing that nightmare of a DD. However I do enjoy my Gearing very much it allows me to counter the other shimi players and have impact at range in smoke on larger targets. I recently unlocked both the Des Moines and Worcester. Love them very much. I am currently working on the Yamato since I do not have a legendary BB yet can't go wrong with the King of big guns.
Excellent info given to new players Montana has the heaviest broadside in the game that revivals an bow tank Yamato... She's actually a beast if you know how to play her. Which is in reverse, sure Conquerer has the deadliest HE hits but Montana has the Accuracy. An Khabarovsk She's really a annoying dd you need soundwave to use her at full protential. An now these new mods have made broken ships more broken.
Good review, I can't argue with any of your points. For me I wasn't in any rush to get any of the legendary ships when I started but I did however pick the projects that I could research faster, for example ones I had ships and commanders to boost them so as to get the rewards, I'm not necessarily recommending it to do that way but it's the way I did it because that's what I wanted to prioritise. I wasn't in any rush to get into legendary tier as I wanted to learn the game before being a liability to my team. Thanks for vid Peek, good review.
Closed Captioning provided by Legends Dev Team LOL. In all seriousness though, this is a very solid video with really good insight. We are all different, but generally speaking I can't disagree with anything Peek said. My biggest buyers remorse moment in 3 years of this game has been Stalinchad. Absolutely a situational ship. If you don't have broadsides to shoot at, the ship is tragic. For me, my bureau has been sitting empty for almost 3 months. If they insist on keeping they Bureau, they need to add some more ships.
@@letumpeek oh, it can't handle certain words and some of the names of the ships LOL. Bourgogne was brigade & or gone Bureau was hero Conqueror was bunker Kurfurst was car first & carefirst Schlieffen was leif & Ashley fins Wooster was booster Des Moines was boeing Kleber was bear & Colbert and random other words along the way. Wasn't complaining, i thought it was funny.
Hi Peek, for the Alaska, it’s all about position. You gotta have teamates that know what they’re doing! This boat is a beast in the right hand! Always 2+ kills and minimum 100k dmg each game i’m in it! Would be nice to play with some of you guys in the future!
You as a great player, should know that in the right hands, the Borgougne (or however the f you spell it lol) is very lethal. Anyone who knows how to play properly knows it is a great boat
What Peek said about Alaska is total fact. Overall it a very good ship; an agile battleship by any stretch of the imagination. However, if the Popeye event has showed us anything, the Alaska doesn't compete well with multitudes of Des Moines and Worcester's I've been playing against. Alaska doesn't shoot from behind islands as well (it's a battleship), has a slower reload (it's a battleship), and makes a bigger target (it's a battleship). Alaska compares better with battleships than it does with cruisers, but there's little chance of it standing toe to toe with any of the legendary tier battleships presently in the game. But I still love it and have many great games playing it. I just don't play it as a traditional cruiser.
If your struggling to beat cruisers in alaska you are probably playing it wrong, no offence, because it doesn't overpen, is much more accurate and fires twice as quick battleships
@@isaacball2687 Point is that because of the layout of the guns and faster reloads Worchester and Des Moines utilize island cover much better than Alaska. In a battle full of fire spammers Alaska is no different than any other battleship other than lower hp.
The only thing you didn’t touch on with the DDs is the klebers concealment and speed. It can get up to like 65-70kts with the right commander build and gets a concealment of like 4-4.5km when you engine boost.
Khabarovsk is very fun to play and potent aswell in my opinion. I play mine with an epic range mod that can get you up to 16km. Couple that with its high speed, high hp pool, a 40% ruddershift mod and it's pretty much like playing a firespamming kiting cruiser, that can't get citadeled 👍
Good stuff. I have all of the early ones - Worc, Des M, Khaba and Minotaur remain strong personal favorites. Given up on the Bureau now. WG's greedy roadblocking, so that one can only progress via having *extremely specific* high-end ships has left me cold. No Research Points, no alternatives whatsoever.
Play Alaska like a battleship (yes, having the right team is important lol) spec it for range and dispersion and stay the hell away from close range Yammys and you might LOVE it 😂 Every time I play Alaska as a cruiser I end up cursing random grandmas. Whenever I treat it like a squishy BB, I decimate all
@mikemyon3570 she's hands down my favorite legendary so far. I have a feeling gearing will take that spot in about 3 weeks lol but as it stands, Alaska is my go to. Her damage output is INSANE with AP. There's nothing quite like hitting multiple citidels on a yammy in a freaking cruiser 🤣🤣🙌 enjoy!
@@Lord_Pistachio_Nut Thanks man! What is your build on her? What modules and commander/inspiration? I guess I will start with Norman Scott as I usually do on american cruisers.
Might be fun to work your way down through all the tiers and talk about good and bad boats. Not every ship in the game or anything just kinda an overview big picture.
lol we inherited the montana armor bug, citadel sits a pixle outside teh hull, mino can cit it. try monty with epic mod, its satisfyingly accurate after bonus #2
My first bureau is the yamato, aboupt half way through right now. Im glad its the best didnt know that. I just wanted it because its a freakij meme of a ship
Thanks for the videos that you put out. Quick question, would you spend 1.4 XP on getting the Republique? And would you sell the boats that you don't like ?
I've played Legends since 2019, back when Jean Bart was still in Campaign. Here's my Hot take lol. Großer Kürfurst is absolutely not AWFUL, but there are better choices like Peek said. GK kinda has a weird situation. It feels like a slight downgrade compared to Buffmarck and the Friedrich. Yes, more guns that hit hard, but the dispersion is a bit more trolly, like with other German BBs that have 3 Barrels per turret (Looking at you, Scharnhorst). By Battle Impact, I think it has to do with Kürfurst's playmaking ability. It can snipe with Yamato, can Brawl with the Russians, and even Dodge torps (with some help with Sonar). GK is a great all rounded ship, but it doesn't excel in particular playstyles, like Yamato or Conqueror. If you decide to skip on GK, Doesn't bother me a bit. Like Peek said, anyone can have a great game in any ship. Personally, I love it to death, GK can be a blast, but it's overdue for some balance in the Dev department. Buff the accuracy, and maybe SLIGHTLY better gun angles, and GK will SOAR in popularity, trust me.
Yes kurfust can be very nasty but its obsolete , i dont care about the secondaries , i want a sonar that last longer and spot torps earlier , than maybe some less lifepoints on the suoerstructure
Absolutely, i will get it in 2 weeks and i will put hipperbon it, orbi'll buy hide, i no longer see secondaries as good as i sawed them, i play since 2021 and after a break i started playng again in the 2023 christmas season.
Worcester has 1/5 (30mm) HE pen not 1/4, so you can pen most cruisers but not battleships unless you take eop. Also secondary Kurfurst is inferior to sniper Kurfurst in all aspects.
I don’t like the Shima. It’s probably something to do with the fact that I have a skill issue with it. Because for some reason I can’t play the shima to save my life. But give me any other DD..lord help the enemy team. Lol. Great video Peek. Take it easy
idk man but saying that destroyers are boaring, some of your wrong data, nah i think u have some room to upgrade. besides pretty much correct on the recomendations
got the hakuryu and honestly i'm not interested in midway. my job in a carrier isn't to chunk massive amounts of dmg from thered team, it's first and foremost to provide spots for my team and haku is way better that way. spot a dd that run behind said 3 bbs? no worries, get in there and keep him lit up, get back to carroer to grab another squad and locate the dd again. not possible with the midway
LT destroyers are all good Cruiser i agree Alaska and Stalingrad are good but situational while Worcester and mino are Always good. Dont know about colbert and napoli but i think they are very good aswell ,just not as impactful as W/M. Kinda agree with the battleships. I still need to test Bourgogne, it may be pretty good but hard to play it, i love my kurfust , i rarely die on it but its impact in matches is very low. Best thing you can do is being focused by the enemy and tank hoping your teamates will take advantage of that
Forgot to mention that the Advanced Research ships require you to play a specific ship at one point in order to continue. Burn a lot of research or money just to finish. WG, wtf! I don't want the Jutland just to get Daring. Already have the gearing.
I understand why you don't like Khab she's one of my personal favs but she's very much and aquired taste that thing isn't a DD she's a really light cruiser without a citadel your whole goal in that thing is to harras and be a nuisiance not to hunt DDs or cap objectives which does effectively mean you're down a DD at the start of the game
I don't like the midway torps are so SO SLOW 40kn, shimakaze is faster. Midway si a ship that kills bbs but kan not kill a good dd player, but most shimas kant tell left from right so midway is stil a good ship.
Lots of misunderstanding here? In today's world of hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit. All Navies without the ability to stop these missiles are completely obsolete today. Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile though inferior in way of operational range-400kms it can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships making it deadly to any carrier in the world. Russia also has the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks Anti-Ship missiles. We know the USA hasn't got a destroyer that can defend against these missiles today? Making the USA's Navy obsolete in today's world. Let's look at the distances the US jets can travel? It's about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. So how can the US deploy any carrier close enough to reach any inland target, and then get back again? They can't, anywhere inside 1700 km's they're sunk, they're toast, they're history. This is also why when looking up the GPS positioning of any US carriers in the South China Sea, will never see them closer than 2000 km's from Chinas mainland. The USA has no capability to attack any militarily capable country who have these modern hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles in their defensive armoury. These are the real facts today, because If the risk outweighs any potential reward, gain, or result = obsolete. The USA has nothing that can stop those missiles today, and China's DF-21D is a carrier killer. A manoeuvrable Ballistic missile that doesn't need to follow a ballistic path, hurtling at your carrier?. You're doomed!
I'm sorry but you gotta be slobbering that Chinese and Russian propaganda knob hard. This entire post screams tell me you don't know anything about US naval doctrine without telling me you don't know anything about US naval doctrine. Also said USA can't attack an capable military country? Let me introduce to you....Iraq....and how the US military completely dismantled every aspect of its military within a month. Hate to break it to you, but USA's experience with conflicts far exceeds both Russia or China....Also remember when Russia said they'd take Ukraine in just a couple of days? Let me ask. How's that working out? Lmao. Good try though. A lot of shit that's in testing rn for US military most of us don't even know about so your "facts" are completely subjective at best.
Biased as always with Wilson's idea of what makes a ship good but it's not the ship but the one holding the controller. Montana is an amazing ship in the correct hands so maybe he says pass because he's no good in it, kinda sounds like a skill issue. Of course he's gonna recommend the annoying brainless fire spamming ships aka easy mode omg kid are you serious??! You're misleading people but then again you were deemed the most toxic glad to see you're living up to it.😂
FYI Napoli only has sap secondarys and stalingrad is gxp only other than that great vid I agree with most of your opinions
I started playing this 2 days ago. And just started the yamato project.
BB:
Missing Schlieffen, California (not available anymore), cruiser: Stalingrad is obtained by XP and not bureau project
Schlieffen is probably my favorite legendary at the moment
This is why the PC version is better. I've played both and the xbox version feels very cut down.
Like every ship shown here has the super ship rating yet all are tier 10 on PC. Why wargaming made it different on Xbox I don't know.
@@D41Michigandoes pc have bureaus? I'm on ps5 but just started on pc, a bit different game.
@@Roadsurfer2k11 yes, but its setup a bit different.
Missing the hakuryu campaign on android. Why?
Dude love your translations English subtitles makes me understand some of hard words by reading it keep it always❤️❤️
Napoli and Stalingrad are the most underrated cruisers at LT. Nearly impossible to kill, insane accuracy 90% of the time. Napoli is crazy maneuverable with OP concealment stats, plus useful SAP secondaries. Stalingrad is the only cruiser where I can citadel a Montana from 17km
0:49
@@letumpeek not triggered, just have a different opinion
@@RedHexGamingAll good. I think everyone knows this but him.
@@RedHexGaming I don't think he thinks you're triggered, I just don't think he cares, at all. :)
I always hated the destroyers but I've been watching different clips on how to play them well. I get your point on finding them boring when you play them the way you should. I realized that you get points for the damage caused when you are spotting so that helped me start to embrace them more. I would run in to cap, do a J hook to face out and a cruiser would pop radar and the entire team would fire. Even with facing out, one shot seemed to shut down my engines and then I would get slaughtered so I had to learn what cruisers had radar and try to stay clear of that range. I've not even been playing 6 months so I'm in awe at how much some of you guys know about all the different ships in the game.
My first Bureau projects should complete in the next week or 2. I'm starting with the Yamato and Z-52 but I'll use your guide on the next picks.
This was an awesome no nonsense video, great stuff mate
Thank you for setting me straight. I was doing Worcester and switched over to Napoli and then from Napoli to Alaska but now thanks to what you said, and I know it’s true, back to Worcester. Appreciate you. 😎
Worcester is brain dead good. Like you can play while blackout drunk and drop 200k. Ship turns on a dime so it damn near can be hit and still has a fantastic bow. Also the guns fire nearly constantly and have nutty fire chance.
@@Sacredsnow2 I LOVE what I’m hearing. Thank you. I need a ship like that now. I’m tired of thinking so much 😂
I am so glad you said what you said about Montana, cause I am only 2 of 5 into my first segment on that ship. I liked Montana on PC and was thinking it was same here. Glad I didn't wast my time. I am switching over to Yamata. Thank you for the videos
Good Video sir thank you...I don't have lots of time to play so these ships will probably be many years out for me...personally I dig the Gearing....she plays just like her sisters and the learning curve is much smaller...keep up the great work..
Do a Legends video on shooting at targets you can't see, like behind mountains and smoking up.
Gotta respect klebers ap aswell, got 8 citadels on a worcester not long ago at 8km
My favorites by far are the Yammy and Worcester with gearing right up there with them. Des Moines is pretty wicked too
Alaska and kaba are probably my 2 favourite legendary ships. Alaska on 14 second reload is good for hunting dds , deleting cruisers and chunking bbs. Kaba is a perfect dd hunter killer for me.
My first DD was the Shimi, I still enjoy playing that nightmare of a DD. However I do enjoy my Gearing very much it allows me to counter the other shimi players and have impact at range in smoke on larger targets.
I recently unlocked both the Des Moines and Worcester. Love them very much. I am currently working on the Yamato since I do not have a legendary BB yet can't go wrong with the King of big guns.
Excellent info given to new players
Montana has the heaviest broadside in the game that revivals an bow tank Yamato...
She's actually a beast if you know how to play her. Which is in reverse, sure Conquerer has the deadliest HE hits but Montana has the Accuracy.
An Khabarovsk She's really a annoying dd you need soundwave to use her at full protential.
An now these new mods have made broken ships more broken.
Good review, I can't argue with any of your points.
For me I wasn't in any rush to get any of the legendary ships when I started but I did however pick the projects that I could research faster, for example ones I had ships and commanders to boost them so as to get the rewards, I'm not necessarily recommending it to do that way but it's the way I did it because that's what I wanted to prioritise. I wasn't in any rush to get into legendary tier as I wanted to learn the game before being a liability to my team.
Thanks for vid Peek, good review.
what about carrier saipan or carrier kaga
Do a updated video on this and discuss the time to obtain issue!
Closed Captioning provided by Legends Dev Team LOL.
In all seriousness though, this is a very solid video with really good insight. We are all different, but generally speaking I can't disagree with anything Peek said.
My biggest buyers remorse moment in 3 years of this game has been Stalinchad. Absolutely a situational ship. If you don't have broadsides to shoot at, the ship is tragic.
For me, my bureau has been sitting empty for almost 3 months. If they insist on keeping they Bureau, they need to add some more ships.
Closed captions? What’s wrong with um?
@@letumpeek oh, it can't handle certain words and some of the names of the ships LOL.
Bourgogne was brigade & or gone
Bureau was hero
Conqueror was bunker
Kurfurst was car first & carefirst
Schlieffen was leif & Ashley fins
Wooster was booster
Des Moines was boeing
Kleber was bear & Colbert
and random other words along the way.
Wasn't complaining, i thought it was funny.
Hi Peek, for the Alaska, it’s all about position. You gotta have teamates that know what they’re doing! This boat is a beast in the right hand! Always 2+ kills and minimum 100k dmg each game i’m in it! Would be nice to play with some of you guys in the future!
I disagree about the Napoli, that is an incredible brawler.
You as a great player, should know that in the right hands, the Borgougne (or however the f you spell it lol) is very lethal. Anyone who knows how to play properly knows it is a great boat
What Peek said about Alaska is total fact. Overall it a very good ship; an agile battleship by any stretch of the imagination. However, if the Popeye event has showed us anything, the Alaska doesn't compete well with multitudes of Des Moines and Worcester's I've been playing against.
Alaska doesn't shoot from behind islands as well (it's a battleship), has a slower reload (it's a battleship), and makes a bigger target (it's a battleship).
Alaska compares better with battleships than it does with cruisers, but there's little chance of it standing toe to toe with any of the legendary tier battleships presently in the game.
But I still love it and have many great games playing it. I just don't play it as a traditional cruiser.
If your struggling to beat cruisers in alaska you are probably playing it wrong, no offence, because it doesn't overpen, is much more accurate and fires twice as quick battleships
@@isaacball2687 Point is that because of the layout of the guns and faster reloads Worchester and Des Moines utilize island cover much better than Alaska.
In a battle full of fire spammers Alaska is no different than any other battleship other than lower hp.
I kind of have all of em except Colbert and midway cause I didn't feel like spending 30mil
What about the Kaga and Saipan? Kaga is a Beast... Fun & Credit Printer. When you like CV's - research this Ship
"If you get caught with your pants down, the whole school is going to see"
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Funny as a new player that just started playing 3 weeks ago.. Yamato and Napoli are the 2 bureaus i selected. Currently 3 stages in.
Who does your captions?!
Let um peek, how do you feel about the Saipan??
I'm working on my last 2 ..I'll have all the bureau's done by the end of July 😊
I would love an updated video on techtree ships..maybe in 2 or 3 videos
The only thing you didn’t touch on with the DDs is the klebers concealment and speed. It can get up to like 65-70kts with the right commander build and gets a concealment of like 4-4.5km when you engine boost.
I feel like khabavarosk is a great ship that does the opposite of what it’s class expects it to do.
How about a video/series about finding redeeming qualities of the "bad" T8 TT ships? Like the Saint Louis, Neptune, Roon, Alsace, Temeraire, etc.
Roon has no redeeming qualities, unless its on the other team. Nice pool of health to farm very quickly.
My name is shimakaze, look upon my works and despair…
Any comments on Saipan or Kaga?
Khabarovsk is very fun to play and potent aswell in my opinion. I play mine with an epic range mod that can get you up to 16km. Couple that with its high speed, high hp pool, a 40% ruddershift mod and it's pretty much like playing a firespamming kiting cruiser, that can't get citadeled 👍
What would U think about the cermont if that monster will ever come in the game???
Good stuff. I have all of the early ones - Worc, Des M, Khaba and Minotaur remain strong personal favorites.
Given up on the Bureau now. WG's greedy roadblocking, so that one can only progress via having *extremely specific* high-end ships has left me cold. No Research Points, no alternatives whatsoever.
Play Alaska like a battleship (yes, having the right team is important lol) spec it for range and dispersion and stay the hell away from close range Yammys and you might LOVE it 😂
Every time I play Alaska as a cruiser I end up cursing random grandmas. Whenever I treat it like a squishy BB, I decimate all
Thanks for the summary, I'm soon about to get the Alaska, either today or tomorrow. So looking forward to learn how to play her. :)
@mikemyon3570 she's hands down my favorite legendary so far. I have a feeling gearing will take that spot in about 3 weeks lol but as it stands, Alaska is my go to. Her damage output is INSANE with AP. There's nothing quite like hitting multiple citidels on a yammy in a freaking cruiser 🤣🤣🙌 enjoy!
@@Lord_Pistachio_Nut Thanks man!
What is your build on her? What modules and commander/inspiration?
I guess I will start with Norman Scott as I usually do on american cruisers.
De Moine def my fav. 4.5 or less reload and a fire breather that will scare the crap out of the enemy.
Plus, the ap is really fun close to bbs, especially yammato.
Might be fun to work your way down through all the tiers and talk about good and bad boats. Not every ship in the game or anything just kinda an overview big picture.
hes done that
lol we inherited the montana armor bug, citadel sits a pixle outside teh hull, mino can cit it.
try monty with epic mod, its satisfyingly accurate after bonus #2
Agreed. I run a full grouping build and it can get disgusting
Also, no Z-52?
Napoli has the regular he ap set up and sap secondaries
I'm German and you prounounced Kurfürst better than many other English speaker👍
My first bureau is the yamato, aboupt half way through right now. Im glad its the best didnt know that. I just wanted it because its a freakij meme of a ship
Nappoli was a beast the first few weeks then the guns just seemed to stop working properly and havnt been the same since.
Great video, I do like Napoli it's tanks if played right and is good in an aggressive push, other that that I agree with you 👌
Im out of proyect i finish them all including the ones wich have been removed after some time
Shima comes with a Elmo horn and a helmet. Its the number 1 ship dead within the first 2-3 minutes of the game
Thanks for the videos that you put out. Quick question, would you spend 1.4 XP on getting the Republique?
And would you sell the boats that you don't like ?
No I’d rather buy 2 tier 7s that Repub it’s a great ship but imo it ain’t worth 1.4 million
napoli, doesnt get sap, but it is hard to kill, pretty accurate too
I still wanna see peek goes fishing
I've played Legends since 2019, back when Jean Bart was still in Campaign. Here's my Hot take lol.
Großer Kürfurst is absolutely not AWFUL, but there are better choices like Peek said. GK kinda has a weird situation. It feels like a slight downgrade compared to Buffmarck and the Friedrich. Yes, more guns that hit hard, but the dispersion is a bit more trolly, like with other German BBs that have 3 Barrels per turret (Looking at you, Scharnhorst).
By Battle Impact, I think it has to do with Kürfurst's playmaking ability. It can snipe with Yamato, can Brawl with the Russians, and even Dodge torps (with some help with Sonar). GK is a great all rounded ship, but it doesn't excel in particular playstyles, like Yamato or Conqueror.
If you decide to skip on GK, Doesn't bother me a bit. Like Peek said, anyone can have a great game in any ship. Personally, I love it to death, GK can be a blast, but it's overdue for some balance in the Dev department. Buff the accuracy, and maybe SLIGHTLY better gun angles, and GK will SOAR in popularity, trust me.
Yes kurfust can be very nasty but its obsolete , i dont care about the secondaries , i want a sonar that last longer and spot torps earlier , than maybe some less lifepoints on the suoerstructure
Absolutely, i will get it in 2 weeks and i will put hipperbon it, orbi'll buy hide, i no longer see secondaries as good as i sawed them, i play since 2021 and after a break i started playng again in the 2023 christmas season.
I wonder how Peek feels about Stalingrad now that it will be getting a buff..
Worcester has 1/5 (30mm) HE pen not 1/4, so you can pen most cruisers but not battleships unless you take eop. Also secondary Kurfurst is inferior to sniper Kurfurst in all aspects.
Agree I run sniper kurfurst
where schlieffen and yoshino
Schlieffen is just like GK. Maybe slightly better or slightly worse. Depends on match maker.
I don’t like the Shima. It’s probably something to do with the fact that I have a skill issue with it. Because for some reason I can’t play the shima to save my life. But give me any other DD..lord help the enemy team. Lol. Great video Peek. Take it easy
Yoshino?
Yoshino is not a bureau project
it is not a bureau project
idk man but saying that destroyers are boaring, some of your wrong data, nah i think u have some room to upgrade.
besides pretty much correct on the recomendations
Yamato is part of my family has been for 800 years
got the hakuryu and honestly i'm not interested in midway. my job in a carrier isn't to chunk massive amounts of dmg from thered team, it's first and foremost to provide spots for my team and haku is way better that way. spot a dd that run behind said 3 bbs? no worries, get in there and keep him lit up, get back to carroer to grab another squad and locate the dd again. not possible with the midway
LT destroyers are all good
Cruiser i agree Alaska and Stalingrad are good but situational while Worcester and mino are Always good.
Dont know about colbert and napoli but i think they are very good aswell ,just not as impactful as W/M.
Kinda agree with the battleships.
I still need to test Bourgogne, it may be pretty good but hard to play it, i love my kurfust , i rarely die on it but its impact in matches is very low. Best thing you can do is being focused by the enemy and tank hoping your teamates will take advantage of that
Dude I love the video and I’m sry to tell but the subtitles are so cursed lol
Wym?
@@letumpeek go back to the video when ever you HE the titles were AE
Hmmm I wonder what his opinion is in schlieffin for 30 mil
That's how you feel about it not everyone else bud
0:49
Stalingrad is not a bureau ship 😅❤
Yeah I know but 2 mill global is just as bad as a long bureau project
@@letumpeek that's true, might even take longer than a bureau project.
Midway is gone in bureau D:
Stalingrad isn't in the bureau, Napoli doesn't have SAP, Stalingrad needs HE badly.
Forgot to mention that the Advanced Research ships require you to play a specific ship at one point in order to continue. Burn a lot of research or money just to finish. WG, wtf! I don't want the Jutland just to get Daring. Already have the gearing.
You don't need the t8 to finish. Just the t6 and t7. Still not cheap though.
You contradicted yourself with the carriers because if a noob can play hakuryu, then a pro can dominate in it
Yamato and Conq the best for new players? I’m at tier IV 😂
I understand why you don't like Khab she's one of my personal favs but she's very much and aquired taste that thing isn't a DD she's a really light cruiser without a citadel your whole goal in that thing is to harras and be a nuisiance not to hunt DDs or cap objectives which does effectively mean you're down a DD at the start of the game
I don't like the midway torps are so SO SLOW 40kn, shimakaze is faster. Midway si a ship that kills bbs but kan not kill a good dd player, but most shimas kant tell left from right so midway is stil a good ship.
Yeah I agree with you and GK I love but that’s just my opinion and playing it it is fun but it is hit or miss
If you don't delete a Conqueror it'll haunt you at the end of the battle full of health.
Best bureau is Saipan/Kaga. Free tier 7 premium ships.
Kaga?
Bourgogne 65% solo win rate, its doing just fine
Yep my arp Iona commanded hakuryu is a "noob" cv
research everything for first module get the commanders than do what you want
2:15 💀💀🍆😭😭😫😫
Stalingrad should've been Petro but at legendary
The only ship I started researching was Yamato theirs no other ship that can take it on so it’s the only one worth getting!!
I got triggerd at Napoli... it's a great cruiser... just admit it that you don't like Italians
Yamato great guns but slow as ALL hell not worth my time to research grind it, I can slap yamato with my Bismarck
Wish this video was out a year ago… wasted a lot of time
Lots of misunderstanding here? In today's world of hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit. All Navies without the ability to stop these missiles are completely obsolete today. Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile though inferior in way of operational range-400kms it can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships making it deadly to any carrier in the world. Russia also has the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks Anti-Ship missiles.
We know the USA hasn't got a destroyer that can defend against these missiles today? Making the USA's Navy obsolete in today's world. Let's look at the distances the US jets can travel? It's about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. So how can the US deploy any carrier close enough to reach any inland target, and then get back again? They can't, anywhere inside 1700 km's they're sunk, they're toast, they're history. This is also why when looking up the GPS positioning of any US carriers in the South China Sea, will never see them closer than 2000 km's from Chinas mainland.
The USA has no capability to attack any militarily capable country who have these modern hi-tech Anti-Ship ballistic missiles in their defensive armoury. These are the real facts today, because If the risk outweighs any potential reward, gain, or result = obsolete. The USA has nothing that can stop those missiles today, and China's DF-21D is a carrier killer. A manoeuvrable Ballistic missile that doesn't need to follow a ballistic path, hurtling at your carrier?. You're doomed!
I'm sorry but you gotta be slobbering that Chinese and Russian propaganda knob hard. This entire post screams tell me you don't know anything about US naval doctrine without telling me you don't know anything about US naval doctrine. Also said USA can't attack an capable military country? Let me introduce to you....Iraq....and how the US military completely dismantled every aspect of its military within a month. Hate to break it to you, but USA's experience with conflicts far exceeds both Russia or China....Also remember when Russia said they'd take Ukraine in just a couple of days? Let me ask. How's that working out? Lmao. Good try though. A lot of shit that's in testing rn for US military most of us don't even know about so your "facts" are completely subjective at best.
Shima players can burn
Biased as always with Wilson's idea of what makes a ship good but it's not the ship but the one holding the controller. Montana is an amazing ship in the correct hands so maybe he says pass because he's no good in it, kinda sounds like a skill issue. Of course he's gonna recommend the annoying brainless fire spamming ships aka easy mode omg kid are you serious??! You're misleading people but then again you were deemed the most toxic glad to see you're living up to it.😂