Construction of foundation for onshore wind turbine

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 76

  • @Knuck_Knucks
    @Knuck_Knucks 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Thank you SO MUCH for demonstrating the absolute inefficiency of windmill construction relative to energy output! 🐿

  • @jennybridge6276
    @jennybridge6276 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    This should b compulsory viewing for every "Greenie". What does this cost???

  • @wozt3257
    @wozt3257 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Now do it 1000s more times across the countryside and pat yourself on the back for saving the environment.

  • @curtislowe4577
    @curtislowe4577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for showing that under the rebar reinforced foundation the puddle of concrete it is built over is not much more than a thin layer of soil prep.

    • @michaelwayne4568
      @michaelwayne4568 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That thin layer is called Phil flow

  • @Sawasdeekat
    @Sawasdeekat ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video, how many tons of concrete are needed to hold that thing down?

    • @jimmytwostones
      @jimmytwostones ปีที่แล้ว

      Looking at the I’d guess about 2000 ton of concrete and maybe 100 ton steel. Didn’t look like they compacted the backfill they used to cover it but if they did there’d be possibly another couple of thousand ton dirt on top of the concrete

    • @colleenking6229
      @colleenking6229 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jimmytwostones It takes 8 tonnes of coal, with 4 tonnes of iron ore and 1 tonne of limestone to make just 1 tonne of steel. And the Greenies want to stop coal mining to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions. ????????? I think there is a whole heap of hypercriticism going on in government over the issues.

  • @sovereignjoe5730
    @sovereignjoe5730 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Do you know many roads need to be constructed to enable the delivery & erection of just one wind turbine & what's the average life of a wind turbine & do they all get scrapped in an ecological way & are birds, humans & other creatures effected negatively by wind turbines?

    • @doriga2009
      @doriga2009 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Totally agree with you,, the amount of energy of material is ridiculous, it should be forbidden to install in mountains of special protection areas. 😢

    • @dimitristsekeris1821
      @dimitristsekeris1821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Literally one dirt road.

  • @pablolabarta5611
    @pablolabarta5611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Wow, zero carbon emission with magical concrete, magical steel and on and on

    • @kim2796
      @kim2796 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      zero carbone emission ? it's a joke ? lol

    • @dimitristsekeris1821
      @dimitristsekeris1821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's much better than lignite mining.

    • @thibauddu6868
      @thibauddu6868 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You do realize that before generating energy, obviously it needs to be built and that would consume energy. Then you need to consider it's whole lifecycle, between 20 and 25 years, how much electricity it has generated and how much it has cost to build and maintain. The result is largely positive.

  • @johnmcentegart007
    @johnmcentegart007 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A Friction foundation would probably use much less concrete and steel to achieve the required torque at maximum wind load plus headroom

  • @openyoureyes3901
    @openyoureyes3901 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And how do we remove this little foundation?

  • @Vikinatorn
    @Vikinatorn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Interesting video, thanks for sharing. No piles? That surprised me.

    • @captinhoop
      @captinhoop 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I’m surprised more don’t fall over to be honest.

    • @brianletter3545
      @brianletter3545 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@captinhoop Probably built to a 'max. wind speed spec.' There may well be an agreed anemometer somewhere around.🤒

  • @mokoyanuar
    @mokoyanuar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    not using piling for foundation??

    • @brianletter3545
      @brianletter3545 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A lot of these will be placed where the bedrock is not far down, I imagine.

    • @braxfield5815
      @braxfield5815 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its basically a giant counterweight. Piles would be too light.

  • @themiyaadikari4140
    @themiyaadikari4140 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How many MW for this base?

  • @saraswatih9703
    @saraswatih9703 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    And how exactly this could be considered a green solution?

  • @mariorojasg
    @mariorojasg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is this anchor bolt cage foundation or just concrete foundation? Thanks

  • @saltyprunz
    @saltyprunz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Some many ecological experts in the world

  • @tylerpedigo2938
    @tylerpedigo2938 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That’s an insane amount of steel. Anyone know how many yards of concrete one of these foundations take?

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just looked it up... 120- 240 cubic meters. A méter cubed is just à bit bigger than a cubic yard.

    • @redwater4778
      @redwater4778 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Over 500 cubic meters

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@redwater4778 kind of blows thé whole idea off the lid of "ecological." The zéro-charbon industry has big money as a priority- no real care to stop polluting.

    • @derklebob8161
      @derklebob8161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Enough to be impossible to remove.

    • @pablolabarta5611
      @pablolabarta5611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      that is correct. An amount of steel , concrete and everything moved, manufactured, and so on with diesel machines...all very renewable! . A windmill of 2MW is about 1600tm ( 1200 of concrete + 70 of steel for foundation + 350 the windmill)

  • @LinhKhanh-dm2si
    @LinhKhanh-dm2si 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The video sound is pretty good, beyond my imagination

    • @Ellabobel
      @Ellabobel 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It all sounds ‘So-good’ to me -- much like any political ‘too_good_to _be_true’. Typical of political Hocus_Pocus to me!!! By the find out the truth most of us will be dead and gone. They’ll just change the whole situation and still nothing anybody can do.

  • @abdulhaki7652
    @abdulhaki7652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am intresting take can do it the work with your company civil structure

  • @НиколайШлеенко-ц8в
    @НиколайШлеенко-ц8в 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    good video but grouting operation was cut

  • @DarrellDevenny
    @DarrellDevenny 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These things will never break even with the energy needed to produce them and install them. Not even close to being “green”.

    • @StarshipCruiser1749
      @StarshipCruiser1749 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can't honestly believe that.. they operate for 20+ years.

    • @steveatkins814
      @steveatkins814 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@StarshipCruiser1749why so many blades in landfill now?

    • @jarek0737
      @jarek0737 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@StarshipCruiser1749 Okay, tell me of a single site that has had a turbine operate for even ten years without any major maintenance? I will wait...

    • @StarshipCruiser1749
      @StarshipCruiser1749 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jarek0737
      1. Roscoe Wind Farm in Sweetwater Texas.
      Operational since 2009
      2. Fenton Wind Farm, Chandler MN.
      Operational since 1994
      3. Maple Ridge Wind Farm, Lowville NY
      Operational since 2006.
      Sorry to keep you waiting.

    • @eifeldude1
      @eifeldude1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@steveatkins814blades are now recyclable lol

  • @libertariantranslator1929
    @libertariantranslator1929 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    That thing would could house a small nuclear reactor and actually generate power!

  • @iamnode2088
    @iamnode2088 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    great video

  • @Frank-co6zp
    @Frank-co6zp 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    crazy!!

  • @umeshmulimani2443
    @umeshmulimani2443 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good video. Thank you

  • @성북구김씨
    @성북구김씨 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good~~

  • @AnilRathod-fo9gy
    @AnilRathod-fo9gy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

  • @Q_20
    @Q_20 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    earth carbon neutral when?

    • @curtislowe4577
      @curtislowe4577 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's a complicated calculation. Here's a comment I've made on other videos:
      I have not yet seen an honest assessment of how much fossil fuel is consumed manufacturing everything related to the foundation. Rebar and concrete require huge amounts of fossil fuel to mine the raw materials, condition/prep the raw materials, make iron then steel then rebar and concrete. Add the steel and copper and composites that make up the wind turbine itself. And finally the entire construction project from site prep to assembly to interconnection.
      I want to know when a wind turbine has produced enough electricity to offset the fossil fuel burned to produce it. I've seen claims that the answer is never.

  • @davebutler3905
    @davebutler3905 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So lucky concrete is carbon neutral!!!!
    ?

  • @ChattrSingh-u7z
    @ChattrSingh-u7z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    यह काम कहां मिलेगा

  • @derykhamshaw3362
    @derykhamshaw3362 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MUST HAVE COST A FORTUNE -- Planning permission put in at Bronte Country for 65 wind turbines the size of Blackpool Tower & if this video is an example then HOW MUCH PEAT will be
    dug up then the experts are correct who have commented on the cost. Loosing all that PEAT with all the roads to 65 turbines & the Flooding with the soak up all lost not including the loss
    of Tourism to Bronte Country. WHO will go on walks from Bronte Parsonage over Ugly Moors with NOISY WIND TURBINES ALL 200 meters high -- ???????????????? --- NO one.

  • @PrashantSingh-pj7nw
    @PrashantSingh-pj7nw 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ya kuch nAhi hai

  • @ariaditya7733
    @ariaditya7733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can i get the foundation drawing?

  • @ChattrSingh-u7z
    @ChattrSingh-u7z 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    यह मेरे को कांटेक्ट करना है कांटेक्ट नंबर मिलेगा क्या किसी के पास

  • @theartofgregoryevans
    @theartofgregoryevans 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yup, thats an ecological solution.

    • @thetasworld
      @thetasworld ปีที่แล้ว

      Can't get more ecological than this...

    • @theartofgregoryevans
      @theartofgregoryevans ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thetasworld For one turbine, 300 cubic yards of cement for the foundation. That's over 2 million pounds each, 40 truckloads of cement! Can you smell carbon foot print ? And the toxicity of the production of the électronics? The mining of the various métals (some ordinary, some bizarre) for both those électronics and the foundation. The severly toxic chemical used in the Labs where components are produced. White coveralls, gloves and booties and respirators for those working on these machines. This is about big business, not about ecology. Then, decommisioning à unit after its 20 year peak of production, and another 10 years for good measure and réputation, and you have masses of nothing reusable. Tons of fiberglass which is pretty much the same as asbestos suitable for the landfills (back to the earth ?) Électronics which required spécial treatment, and oh yeah, à 69 foot block of cement that will never, ever be moved anywhere. LMAO. Do you see how naïve we can be when we rally behind big business that's waving an ECO flag ?

    • @thetasworld
      @thetasworld ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theartofgregoryevans couldn't agree more with you. We have to do some serious reconsidering of this 'green energy production'

    • @panishirovim2888
      @panishirovim2888 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, fuck the trees and the forest and the animals!
      Burn them and go eco mode!
      I wonder how many decades a Steam Electric Station needs to operate in order to produce the fumes of a wildfire! But it is fascism to wonder nowadays! All heil Klaus!

  • @aladeenmadafaka6286
    @aladeenmadafaka6286 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Ive heard one windmill doesnot produce energy through whole lifetime which would equal his price to build it. So we have to donate this "green" energy. Whole green deal is such a fake

    • @donmerry
      @donmerry 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What energy production is green? None.

    • @eifeldude1
      @eifeldude1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@donmerrylol bullshit

  • @fredflintstone8159
    @fredflintstone8159 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    soooooooooooo, all of the steel, and concrete is manufactured using renewable resources? hahahahahaha

    • @pauloriglio5076
      @pauloriglio5076 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The sarcasm isn’t warranted, especially when you didn’t get Curtis’s point.

    • @derklebob8161
      @derklebob8161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And then its put into the ground where it will blight the landscape and never be removed.

    • @omjagdeesh8731
      @omjagdeesh8731 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@derklebob8161 yeah because coal plants emitting soot all over are so much better right?