I remember an interview with Stig where they asked him about all the spectators standing on the roads. He said they had to consider them like trees, otherwise it would be impossible to race.
@@iamhugry didnt think about that, i just assumed they had faith in their co drivers calls. lil road here, lil road not here. this is why the cut, no cut, danger wide are important calls. unless you hear those, those arent people, just open road.
Group B was actually the easiest class to enter since only 200 homologation models were required. Entering was easy, winning was another story. The 86 Portuguese rally was not suspended, it continued, only without the main works teams who withdrew as a mark of respect of those who were killed. Rally Portugal was also Audi's last show in group B, not Corsica where Toivonen died. It also needs mentioning that before Audi ever entered a competitive rally, it was used as a course opening vehicle, that car with lights and siren that warns spectators that the stage will be hot soon; that car was driven by Hannu Mikkola, and at the end of the rally his time was some 24 minutes faster than the rally winner's. It has to be the only time in history when a course opening car would've won the rally had it entered it.
Yes, Group B was out of this world, and also out of control! Remember what happened to Henri Toiveren, mind you, that was partially due to the lack of Marshals. Those guys are the for the most part, volunteers, I know, because I was one once on the RAC Rally, back in the day.
I really wish they would bring a group b style group back where manufactures would be able to do almost anything they want, but more restrictions on safety and preventing people from being so close to the track
@@egeayvala1799 yeah fair point alot of the group b drivers said that it was so fast you didnt even have time to react to turns most of the time, just memory and predicting it based off your co-driver, would still be cool to see something like group b again though
@@AEWYU it would lead to many deaths,because modern rally drivers don't have the experience.im pretty sure they are more skilled than me and I will never probably be at their level,I do wish one day I could but men in the 80s learned to drive with less simulators and sh+t...but they learned from real life.here is my point I know you think it would be "cool" but today's society isn't that irresponsible and on coke :D surely there is a way for you to drive one of those cars on a track. Or at least you could build a car like that for yourself but forget about going into the WRC with it
some corrections: 0:50 There was a minimum Weight dependent on the dsiplacement(as it was comon knowledge that lighter is better(so lighter/smaller weigt/displacement classes were preverable)) 1:10 not that sophispicated. they where fast because they where light and powerfull and had large Teams around to adapt the cars to conditions but they where not technically sophisticated(f1 of the time was in a different league) 9:55 The Body was Steel, The Roll Cage is Aluminium, Some Body parts are aluminium more where Composite 11:20 it was not the pinnacle (The pinnacle was what Peugeot, Lancia and Ford did) it was a try to make a fundamental uncompetitive Car competitive again 13:40 Audi Used Rear wheel Drive at Le Mans(no quattro) 14:00. its not a system its a marketing term (there are many different systems sold under the Quattro umbrella with almost nothing in common)
@@jordankelly4684 Not the OP. He's largely right. Although the quattro did use the carbon-kevlar body shells, the quattro did mostly use a steel body. HOWEVER the quattro was the "rally" pinnacle at that time because literally everybody adopted's audi's system after the quattro but not everybodywas as successful. For example the Delta wasn't as successful (sadly only was around till group B died). What lancia attempted with their stratos was like fighting a technological masterpiece at that time (the quattro) with sheer brute force and driver skill. What OP seems to have forgotten that motorsport can have multiple pinnacles, and the quattro was its own in the sport AT THAT TIME. Making an uncompetitive car competitive again was just a useful side effect. Also Rally cars were sophisticated at that time because Rally was the only sport to build cars almost as fast as WEC with the nimbleness of a drift car and the durability of a safari/dakar rally car to survive multiple sideways jumps and weatherproofing. Every other sport used carefully assembled vehicles that would seem delicate compared to a rally car, albeit being an odd comparison. WRC was as sophisticated as F1, just in a different sphere of technological development.
You'd have to be silly to assume WRC was "not that sophisticated" at that time.The technological development in rally was masterful. Just not as well marketed as F1 or Sports Car. Rally was the only sport to build cars almost as fast as WEC with the nimbleness of a drift car and the durability of a safari/dakar rally car to survive multiple sideways jumps and be weather proof. Every other sport used carefully assembled vehicles that would seem delicate compared to a rally car, albeit being an odd comparison. WRC was as sophisticated as F1 and WEC, just in a different sphere of technological development.
@@arjun._.bbC6 its not about opinion its about facts ===> groub b not sophisticated for a top level motor sport. if you want to understand it look at the used technology and compare to what was standard in road cars at that time and other motor sports. If you want to blast stupidity into the internet feel free to do so but dont expect an answer.
@@harrie205 Nobody said anything about opinions??? This is a discussion on facts and facts alone. Which btw I did agree majorly with in case you missed. and yet technology from group b spread to all other forms of Motorsport the same way tech from WSC and F1 did too. Motorsport shares tech, and subpar "unsophisticated" tech doesn't see much presence elsewhere. Pretty much all upper end hatchbacks and subcompacts made since group b have built on homologation standards developed during group b. I'm personally a bit WEC and F1 fan, but I'm not silly enough to discredit the contributions of group b and rally as a whole to automotive development. Also remember, although not directly related, but R18 etron quattro would never have come into existence had quattro not succeeded in group b. I'm not expecting an answer from anybody, definitely not from somebody who's default approach is reluctance to discuss despite initiating a discussion. This is an open comments section and people are free to discuss as they wish. So you are free to leave this discussion to somebody far more cordial.
I guess, it is the algorythm. If you don't upload every two days nowadays videos, setting hashtags, use a broadcast plan you only get high views with BS.
Quattro in Le Mans? Permanent awd is not permitted in the endurance racing. Btw it’s Blomqvist not Blooomqvist, and Piëch not Peach and many more. Google can help with pronounciation either. These guys deserves it, they’re just legends in motorsport history.
A car can be as good as it can be, it still needs a skilled driver to win with it. I just watched Jeremy Clarcksons video about audi vs lancia (1982 or so), 4wheel drive vs 2 wheel drive. With drivers like walter rorl, lancia beat audi. Rorl said the Lancia fit like a glove and responded right to his wishes. Did the Audi do that too?
@@mstar501 Compared to a Ford Sierra, a Merc 190, a BMW 3 & 5 (and many others) every Audi in the 80s had a handling like a big heavy truck, quattro or FWD. I actually have no idea where all this Audi hype comes from...
@@juppzmuda9725They got good results, but that doesnt mean the road going vehciles were great. Audi were pretty shit cars back in the 80s and even into the 90s, for various reasons, though electrical issues and premature rust were common issues. I dare say the race prepped vehicles were not entirely reflective of the road going vehicles.
@@PhilGreer100 True. Even the rally spec ones weren't exactly handling wonders. I remember an interview with Walter Röhrl where he said that he has been shocked how badly they drove around corners when compared to his former Lancia 037.
13:33 The Quattro system wasn’t “winning 13 times” at Le Mans, as those 5x R8 wins, 3x R10 TDI wins, the R15 TDI win and first R18 win appear to be with 2WD cars, and were already dominating at Le Mans. You can probably call those 3x R18 e-tron winners “quattro”, since the Hybrid Motor Generator Units were driving the front wheels.
Amazing video man. Similiar to the channel called the squidd only shorter episodes which is not bad. Looking forward to seeing this channel grow and seeing more quality videos like this. Just don't quit.
Great Video. Only a pitty you due so little respect to the individuals by pronouncing their names wrong. It's pronounced Piëch (pronouned Piejech) and not Peach (that's a fruit) Walter Röhrl with a silent (R), not Rorrel Hannu Mikola (pronounced Miekola) not Mikoolla Michèle Mouton (silent 'n' at the end), not Moeton
Another fantastic documentary, with a most exemplary narrative. Friends! I used to add Friends, 19:00 to the Tuesday listing of my uni' timetable in 1997. (Courteney Cox I admit). Then it got better with the FIA trick and all that. I wil guess without looking it up that a 5-cyl inline crankshaft would be 1-4-2-5-3 ??? It's an odd number so the firing order would have to be one-at-a-time, right? Seizure in two weeks.
Currently driving an '06 A4 2.0T. It has 460000kms on it and it is my winter drift missile. Quattro is epic in the snow, just need to have balls big enough to power through
Hannu Mikkola was mechanical engineer by proffesion. He had a big impact developing the car during the season. Audi quitted after Portugal, it didnt compete in Tour De Corse . Audi S 1 EVO 1 won one race, San Remo 1985.
Just a small correction. Michele Mouton drove Audi at Pikes Peak and broke the record, not Walter Rohrl. Audi did that to help them lunch their cars in USA
The correct answers are: despite all the penalties they put on her, Michele destroyed the record in an Audi S1 in 1985, the only woman to win and break the Pike s Peak record, then B Unser broke that record in 86 with a quattro S1 Evo, and in 87 Walter Rohrl broke the record again in another S1 Evo.
Last September Audi Club of America Honored Michele Mouton with a issue to celebrate her distinguished career for Audi and one of the best Women drivers Ever.
@@prinzeugen1220Weren’t those other records set after they started paving though? Meaning she was the last record holder on a full dirt Pikes Peak? Or do I have that mixed up.
Roland Gumpert is still active trying to promote methanol fuel cell cars as an option for high range electrical vehicles. Just look for Gumpert Nathalie. Or look for the TopGear review of Hammond of the Gumpert Apollo landing on the top of the leader board. Gumpert still has his spirit 😊😊
13:55 to be honest... the e-tron suv was always a Quattro... the only difference is the size of the front and rear motor, they all have dual motor AWD.
VW Iltis where Gumpert, Treser & Bensinger got the Idea for Quattro from was their own development and had absolutely nothing to to with VW - except its VW badge: Developed by Audi and built by Audi as an improved version of the DKW Munga (DKW being one of four companies that joined to become Audi - hence the four rings)
This audi quattro looks a lot like the renault 11 phase 1 hatchback Renault 11 ph1 1.4 turbo is a nice car The renault 21 turbo quadra was an awesome track race car
Lancia is laughing its hats off. Didnt its 2wd 037 defeat the audi in its home turf? And the delta integrale practically blew the quatro into the oblivion...
Maybe but as far as a marketing strategy Audi dominated in a way nobody else did… Today not a single auto manufacturer in the US sells less than one car/truck with AWD, that was something that Audi started, and to this day Quattro is a household name when it comes to AWD, it was a massively successful marketing campaign, which at the end of the day sells cars… Something that Lancia doesn’t do a whole lot of anymore…
@@R0ots Audi is a big company while Lancia wasnt so big and Lancia liked to do risky moves as a company whole audi used to play safe no Wonder Lancia isnt here
It just others guys try to using 4wd with mid-engine, like 205 t16. Audi's outdated front-engine will be no advantage and Audi Management believed mid-engine race car would not improve Stockcar's sales so they say don't wasted money thet out. Engineers try to creater mid-engine proto car but photo been leaked project dead
What is the real game? How practical can it really be to have an extraordinarily difficult game such as rallying? The unpredictable track, the unpredictable traction, the unpredictable corners, the lack of safety. This may actually reveal i suppose it might beso. I get all sassy like a 19 year old girl trying to keep things her way. And I dont know where I picked that up at.
Audi remained the only 4WD car in the field in 1982 the Lancia 0.37 was the quickest way for Lancia to build the first true Group B Car much lighter and much simpler than the heavy and still complex Quattro They picked their rallies mainly those that favoured 2WD and avoided those that did not this was a time when only so many of the events counted towards your points total all the teams had to drop points at the end of the series thus they got to drops those points from their worst results. Audi were still running what was a Group 4 cars they made changes to bring it up to Group B standards through 1982. all the rest of major Factory teams were still running Group 4 cars rebranded under the Group B rules. all were 2WD still but all were scrambling to bring and develop new 4WD cars it would take until 1984 before the next Tech jump would come from Peugeot with its 205 T16 rally car . that would be the car to beat after 1984 until the tragic events of 1985 and 1986 banished Group B forever 4WD cars from Ford , Lancia and the Mini Metro filled up the numbers with a pile of other brands still developing their own 4WD Monster from the likes of Toyota , Nissan , Opel Porsche some of these would be later called Group S cars but that is revised history any good book on the subject will tell you these later cars were well in advanced development before the Group B ban came into effect. Group S only came to the table as a way to keep these cars running in the WRC as teams like Peugeot had pumped a lot of money into there winning format and had no replacement car to turn too as did many of the big players like Ford and Porsche but it was not to be. ultimately It was Lancia whom the rule changes handed them massive advantage with a ready to rally car in the form of the Greatest rally car of all time the Lancia Delta HF Integrale a car that would win 6 WRC Championships it would take the Japanese to finally beat Lancia and thus start the run of cars from Japan that would make up most of the wins in the 90's all been 4WD. Like anyone as a teenager in 1980 the Quattro was like something form another Planet. there was a Guy who owned one next to were may parent had there Shop in Audi White they were still very rare at that point in the UK. I was lucky enough to see most of the Group B cars running in anger thanks to my location in the UK hosting several stages of the long gone Lombard RAC Rally so I saw the last two years of Group B so all the main players then the 205 T16 Evo . Metro 6R4 . Lancia Delta S4 the Audi Quattro Sports and the A4 and the Quattro S1 E1 Monster and the Ford RS200 Evo. with even many of the Local Petrol Stations and car parks been used as between Stage servicing points. great memories of those late 80's rallies and even the return to Group A that followed. thanks for the video.
tell if im wrong but after the winning streak because Mitsubishi was broke but built the best car the Lancer Evo after the Lancer entered the lancer destroyed the quatro
Wrong era Lancer is from group a and audi from group b (unless you are talking about that one group a audi but it wasnt fast and i think it left before Lancer even existed)
So much effort went into making this video. The less I understand why you wouldn't take that insignificant amount of time to check the proper pronunciation of names. This non-attention to detail - standing in stark contrast to the rest - drags the experience down. Anyhow, good luck!
We have been working hard (and improving) on this particular aspect in our more recent videos! Thank you for the feedback and thank you for watching :)
Obviously you're gonna impress everyone who doesn't know any better. Ignorance is deadly. The BEAST, THE LANCIA DELTA S4 ENDED GROUP B. Why? It's too fast, I can't keep up with it. That's a direct quote from from Toivonen, the Lancia driver winning the damn race and crashed. Talk about genius, try turboing and supercharging simultaneously.. the Audi engine went up to 2.5 litre. Lancia was closer to 1.8...and they achieved over 800hp out of it. Check out Franz Novak's yellow bull Delta and you'll know what I mean. I love the Quattro, but let's get really real.😁
you really said that the audi quattro was the perfect car even when the lancia delta s4 exists. the quattros high and upfront center of mass combined with the lack of a center differential made it understeering pig especially in the tight hairpins at the asphalt rallies and even on gravel it was bad, every video you see from gravel stages the car is understeering over oversteering which is not good for speed and control.
Very good video, but it wasn't a perfect rally car, the CG was too front...this car won a lot only because it was the only AWD car at the time and they hadn't restriciton on power output.. later on when Audi put the new S2 on group A regulations on 90's, they shamed...
It was far from perfect. It has changed the scene and was much faster than 2wd's obviously. But compare to any other awd rallycar (except the BX and 6R4) it was a crap. Heavy, bad dimensions, aweful weight distribution, gearbox failures.... On tarmac it was slower than the rest. Even the 037 beat it.
Though Subaru was involved in rally racing since the 70s, they didn't make a mark of the WRC until the 95 season when it was between Toyota and Suburu... until Toyota got caught cheating effectively giving Colin McRae the championship in the 555 Impreza.
Consider supporting us on Ko-fi so we can keep making awesome content for you guys! :)
ko-fi.com/motorlegends
I was going to watch this video, but the horrible AI thumbnail put me off entirely.
I remember an interview with Stig where they asked him about all the spectators standing on the roads. He said they had to consider them like trees, otherwise it would be impossible to race.
True, if you don't gaslight yourself to think they are trees you will hit them, hard
@@iamhugry didnt think about that, i just assumed they had faith in their co drivers calls. lil road here, lil road not here.
this is why the cut, no cut, danger wide are important calls.
unless you hear those, those arent people, just open road.
It was Mouton.
Some of the ‘trees’ wanted to put their fingertips inside the huge airvents of the Peugeot T16🙄🙄
He also said he had to allow a meter to either side when he was driving like hell. That's how difficult the Quattro was to drive.
Group B was actually the easiest class to enter since only 200 homologation models were required. Entering was easy, winning was another story. The 86 Portuguese rally was not suspended, it continued, only without the main works teams who withdrew as a mark of respect of those who were killed. Rally Portugal was also Audi's last show in group B, not Corsica where Toivonen died. It also needs mentioning that before Audi ever entered a competitive rally, it was used as a course opening vehicle, that car with lights and siren that warns spectators that the stage will be hot soon; that car was driven by Hannu Mikkola, and at the end of the rally his time was some 24 minutes faster than the rally winner's. It has to be the only time in history when a course opening car would've won the rally had it entered it.
It was actually 400 units, but Lancia had its own interpretation of that number.
@@metalbladepegasus7854 Nope, group B was always 200 units
Amazing documentary! RIP to the drivers at the end :(
Thanks for watching!
Yes, Group B was out of this world, and also out of control! Remember what happened to Henri Toiveren, mind you, that was partially due to the lack of Marshals. Those guys are the for the most part, volunteers, I know, because I was one once on the RAC Rally, back in the day.
I really wish they would bring a group b style group back where manufactures would be able to do almost anything they want, but more restrictions on safety and preventing people from being so close to the track
There is no way that could be possible,470hp on a 1200kg car is too dangerous even for the most professional drivers in the world
@@egeayvala1799 yeah fair point alot of the group b drivers said that it was so fast you didnt even have time to react to turns most of the time, just memory and predicting it based off your co-driver, would still be cool to see something like group b again though
@@AEWYU it would lead to many deaths,because modern rally drivers don't have the experience.im pretty sure they are more skilled than me and I will never probably be at their level,I do wish one day I could but men in the 80s learned to drive with less simulators and sh+t...but they learned from real life.here is my point I know you think it would be "cool" but today's society isn't that irresponsible and on coke :D surely there is a way for you to drive one of those cars on a track. Or at least you could build a car like that for yourself but forget about going into the WRC with it
@@egeayvala1799 Don't tell this guy the stats of modern Rally1 cars.
Rally1 is very much like modern group B
some corrections:
0:50 There was a minimum Weight dependent on the dsiplacement(as it was comon knowledge that lighter is better(so lighter/smaller weigt/displacement classes were preverable))
1:10 not that sophispicated. they where fast because they where light and powerfull and had large Teams around to adapt the cars to conditions but they where not technically sophisticated(f1 of the time was in a different league)
9:55 The Body was Steel, The Roll Cage is Aluminium, Some Body parts are aluminium more where Composite
11:20 it was not the pinnacle (The pinnacle was what Peugeot, Lancia and Ford did) it was a try to make a fundamental uncompetitive Car competitive again
13:40 Audi Used Rear wheel Drive at Le Mans(no quattro)
14:00. its not a system its a marketing term (there are many different systems sold under the Quattro umbrella with almost nothing in common)
Sound like a rally hater
@@jordankelly4684 Not the OP. He's largely right. Although the quattro did use the carbon-kevlar body shells, the quattro did mostly use a steel body.
HOWEVER the quattro was the "rally" pinnacle at that time because literally everybody adopted's audi's system after the quattro but not everybodywas as successful. For example the Delta wasn't as successful (sadly only was around till group B died). What lancia attempted with their stratos was like fighting a technological masterpiece at that time (the quattro) with sheer brute force and driver skill. What OP seems to have forgotten that motorsport can have multiple pinnacles, and the quattro was its own in the sport AT THAT TIME. Making an uncompetitive car competitive again was just a useful side effect.
Also Rally cars were sophisticated at that time because Rally was the only sport to build cars almost as fast as WEC with the nimbleness of a drift car and the durability of a safari/dakar rally car to survive multiple sideways jumps and weatherproofing. Every other sport used carefully assembled vehicles that would seem delicate compared to a rally car, albeit being an odd comparison. WRC was as sophisticated as F1, just in a different sphere of technological development.
You'd have to be silly to assume WRC was "not that sophisticated" at that time.The technological development in rally was masterful. Just not as well marketed as F1 or Sports Car. Rally was the only sport to build cars almost as fast as WEC with the nimbleness of a drift car and the durability of a safari/dakar rally car to survive multiple sideways jumps and be weather proof. Every other sport used carefully assembled vehicles that would seem delicate compared to a rally car, albeit being an odd comparison. WRC was as sophisticated as F1 and WEC, just in a different sphere of technological development.
@@arjun._.bbC6 its not about opinion its about facts ===> groub b not sophisticated for a top level motor sport.
if you want to understand it look at the used technology and compare to what was standard in road cars at that time and other motor sports. If you want to blast stupidity into the internet feel free to do so but dont expect an answer.
@@harrie205
Nobody said anything about opinions??? This is a discussion on facts and facts alone. Which btw I did agree majorly with in case you missed.
and yet technology from group b spread to all other forms of Motorsport the same way tech from WSC and F1 did too. Motorsport shares tech, and subpar "unsophisticated" tech doesn't see much presence elsewhere. Pretty much all upper end hatchbacks and subcompacts made since group b have built on homologation standards developed during group b. I'm personally a bit WEC and F1 fan, but I'm not silly enough to discredit the contributions of group b and rally as a whole to automotive development. Also remember, although not directly related, but R18 etron quattro would never have come into existence had quattro not succeeded in group b.
I'm not expecting an answer from anybody, definitely not from somebody who's default approach is reluctance to discuss despite initiating a discussion. This is an open comments section and people are free to discuss as they wish. So you are free to leave this discussion to somebody far more cordial.
Damn how is the channel so small but the quality so high 🤔
I guess, it is the algorythm. If you don't upload every two days nowadays videos, setting hashtags, use a broadcast plan you only get high views with BS.
@@christianschmidt1207 yea could be but damn this dude will probs get a ton load of views soon
Fingers crossed! Thanks for watching :)
@@MotorLegends-storiesyou should make a video on the Mercedes clk gtr
Adding it to the list ✅
Quattro in Le Mans? Permanent awd is not permitted in the endurance racing. Btw it’s Blomqvist not Blooomqvist, and Piëch not Peach and many more. Google can help with pronounciation either. These guys deserves it, they’re just legends in motorsport history.
This chanel needs more followers this is such high quality content. Hope for you to be one of the biggest car content channel 💪🏻
A car can be as good as it can be, it still needs a skilled driver to win with it. I just watched Jeremy Clarcksons video about audi vs lancia (1982 or so), 4wheel drive vs 2 wheel drive. With drivers like walter rorl, lancia beat audi. Rorl said the Lancia fit like a glove and responded right to his wishes. Did the Audi do that too?
Did you ever drive an eighties Audi Quattro? When no, you don't know how good handling actually was at that time.
But they had to bend rules and do absolutely everything to be ahead. Audi was just a better car and it changed the industry forever.
@@mstar501 Compared to a Ford Sierra, a Merc 190, a BMW 3 & 5 (and many others) every Audi in the 80s had a handling like a big heavy truck, quattro or FWD. I actually have no idea where all this Audi hype comes from...
@@juppzmuda9725They got good results, but that doesnt mean the road going vehciles were great. Audi were pretty shit cars back in the 80s and even into the 90s, for various reasons, though electrical issues and premature rust were common issues. I dare say the race prepped vehicles were not entirely reflective of the road going vehicles.
@@PhilGreer100 True.
Even the rally spec ones weren't exactly handling wonders. I remember an interview with Walter Röhrl where he said that he has been shocked how badly they drove around corners when compared to his former Lancia 037.
0:26 Ah the 'hands on head of flabbergastion'
Stig Blomqvist
13:33 The Quattro system wasn’t “winning 13 times” at Le Mans, as those 5x R8 wins, 3x R10 TDI wins, the R15 TDI win and first R18 win appear to be with 2WD cars, and were already dominating at Le Mans. You can probably call those 3x R18 e-tron winners “quattro”, since the Hybrid Motor Generator Units were driving the front wheels.
Amazing video man. Similiar to the channel called the squidd only shorter episodes which is not bad. Looking forward to seeing this channel grow and seeing more quality videos like this. Just don't quit.
The comparison to the squidd is very much appreciated! Thanks for watching :)
Damn I watched the full video and saw afterwards how small your channel is!
Awesome video!🤝🏽 Keep up the good work!🔥
Very kind words, thank you!
One secret of success in life is for a man to be ready for his opportunity when it comes.
I've owned this quattro for shorts years, greats handling with greats tork
Great Video.
Only a pitty you due so little respect to the individuals by pronouncing their names wrong.
It's pronounced Piëch (pronouned Piejech) and not Peach (that's a fruit)
Walter Röhrl with a silent (R), not Rorrel
Hannu Mikola (pronounced Miekola) not Mikoolla
Michèle Mouton (silent 'n' at the end), not Moeton
2:00 That is the same Gumpert that later on, founded Gumpert Sportwagenmanufaktur
He also invented a methanol powered fuelcell for cars.
Another fantastic documentary, with a most exemplary narrative. Friends! I used to add Friends, 19:00 to the Tuesday listing of my uni' timetable in 1997. (Courteney Cox I admit). Then it got better with the FIA trick and all that. I wil guess without looking it up that a 5-cyl inline crankshaft would be 1-4-2-5-3 ??? It's an odd number so the firing order would have to be one-at-a-time, right?
Seizure in two weeks.
Rally racing is the best car racing there is, ( in my eyes )😊😊
Currently driving an '06 A4 2.0T. It has 460000kms on it and it is my winter drift missile. Quattro is epic in the snow, just need to have balls big enough to power through
Hannu Mikkola was mechanical engineer by proffesion. He had a big impact developing the car during the season. Audi quitted after Portugal, it didnt compete in Tour De Corse . Audi S 1 EVO 1 won one race, San Remo 1985.
The fence was confused about whether it was supposed to keep things in or keep things out.
The touring car was not the quattro, that was just the nickname because of the AWD, it is actually the audi v8
How to get the Quattro S1 around bends; understeer, oversteer, understeer, oversteer!
i love how the comentator butchers the german names .... hahah Ferdinand "PEACH"?
Pro tip: Finnish words are stressed on the first sylabus, so its Mkola, Hkkinen , Sto, etc
I don't believe in failure. It's not failure if you enjoyed the process.
Just a small correction. Michele Mouton drove Audi at Pikes Peak and broke the record, not Walter Rohrl. Audi did that to help them lunch their cars in USA
Where did you hear that?
The correct answers are: despite all the penalties they put on her, Michele destroyed the record in an Audi S1 in 1985, the only woman to win and break the Pike s Peak record, then B Unser broke that record in 86 with a quattro S1 Evo, and in 87 Walter Rohrl broke the record again in another S1 Evo.
Last September Audi Club of America Honored Michele Mouton with a issue to celebrate her distinguished career for Audi and one of the best Women drivers Ever.
@@prinzeugen1220Weren’t those other records set after they started paving though? Meaning she was the last record holder on a full dirt Pikes Peak? Or do I have that mixed up.
@@griffins750 Rod Millen in his Celica holds the all dirt record, that was in '94
very good story!
*Laughing in Polish*
This car has been beaten by the Polonez 2000 once in the 80s.
Once😂
Roland Gumpert is still active trying to promote methanol fuel cell cars as an option for high range electrical vehicles. Just look for Gumpert Nathalie. Or look for the TopGear review of Hammond of the Gumpert Apollo landing on the top of the leader board. Gumpert still has his spirit 😊😊
In terms of e-quattro you didn't even mention the Hoonitron that was made specialy for Ken Block. A very impressive piece of engineering.
What was the Walter rohll Peugeot pike peak footage doing in this video.
How do you only have 2.45k subscribers????
Haha, thanks! 🙏
I remember a gentleman who would drive a grey import Renault5 Turbo 2 in the Berkeley Hills with a California plate that read GROUP B
13:55 to be honest... the e-tron suv was always a Quattro... the only difference is the size of the front and rear motor, they all have dual motor AWD.
9:03 Slow that down to .25 it sure looks like a milwaukee cordless in the 80’s
All hail the mighty Quattro
It's not possible to convince a monkey to give you a banana by promising it infinite bananas when they die.
Just out of curiosity: how much of this is ai generated?
No AI is used in the script, video editing or voice over. Thanks for watching!
Not AI but HEAVILY borrowed from Jeremy Clarkson's Audi vs Lancia.
@@MotorLegends-stories was it used in any other aspect?
@MotorLegends-stories can i have a response?
@@scordatura9259dude what else is there? He gave you your answer
VW Iltis where Gumpert, Treser & Bensinger got the Idea for Quattro from was their own development and had absolutely nothing to to with VW - except its VW badge: Developed by Audi and built by Audi as an improved version of the DKW Munga (DKW being one of four companies that joined to become Audi - hence the four rings)
This channel is VERYYY similar to the SQUIDD.. In a good way
Love that channel, we’ll take this as a big compliment 👌🏽
@@MotorLegends-stories It is a compliment!
This audi quattro looks a lot like the renault 11 phase 1 hatchback
Renault 11 ph1 1.4 turbo is a nice car
The renault 21 turbo quadra was an awesome track race car
Still the 037 beat this “unbeatable car”
The legendary lancia 037 stradle
@ fr
Lancia is laughing its hats off.
Didnt its 2wd 037 defeat the audi in its home turf?
And the delta integrale practically blew the quatro into the oblivion...
Guess who’s still standing to this day though 😂
Maybe but as far as a marketing strategy Audi dominated in a way nobody else did… Today not a single auto manufacturer in the US sells less than one car/truck with AWD, that was something that Audi started, and to this day Quattro is a household name when it comes to AWD, it was a massively successful marketing campaign, which at the end of the day sells cars… Something that Lancia doesn’t do a whole lot of anymore…
@@R0ots Audi is a big company while Lancia wasnt so big and Lancia liked to do risky moves as a company whole audi used to play safe no Wonder Lancia isnt here
It just others guys try to using 4wd with mid-engine, like 205 t16. Audi's outdated front-engine will be no advantage and Audi Management believed mid-engine race car would not improve Stockcar's sales so they say don't wasted money thet out. Engineers try to creater mid-engine proto car but photo been leaked project dead
Lancia are dirty cheaters
What is the real game? How practical can it really be to have an extraordinarily difficult game such as rallying? The unpredictable track, the unpredictable traction, the unpredictable corners, the lack of safety. This may actually reveal i suppose it might beso. I get all sassy like a 19 year old girl trying to keep things her way. And I dont know where I picked that up at.
will you also talk about JDM cars
i like the idea of this channel
They’re on the to-do list ✅
The mispronunciation of names makes me wonder if this was AI generated. . .
totally sounds like it is tbh
Ferdinand Peach
Audi remained the only 4WD car in the field in 1982 the Lancia 0.37 was the quickest way for Lancia to build the first true Group B Car much lighter and much simpler than the heavy and still complex Quattro They picked their rallies mainly those that favoured 2WD and avoided those that did not this was a time when only so many of the events counted towards your points total all the teams had to drop points at the end of the series thus they got to drops those points from their worst results.
Audi were still running what was a Group 4 cars they made changes to bring it up to Group B standards through 1982.
all the rest of major Factory teams were still running Group 4 cars rebranded under the Group B rules. all were 2WD still but all were scrambling to bring and develop new 4WD cars it would take until 1984 before the next Tech jump would come from Peugeot with its 205 T16 rally car . that would be the car to beat after 1984 until the tragic events of 1985 and 1986 banished Group B forever 4WD cars from Ford , Lancia and the Mini Metro filled up the numbers with a pile of other brands still developing their own 4WD Monster from the likes of Toyota , Nissan , Opel Porsche some of these would be later called Group S cars but that is revised history any good book on the subject will tell you these later cars were well in advanced development before the Group B ban came into effect.
Group S only came to the table as a way to keep these cars running in the WRC as teams like Peugeot had pumped a lot of money into there winning format and had no replacement car to turn too as did many of the big players like Ford and Porsche but it was not to be. ultimately It was Lancia whom the rule changes handed them massive advantage with a ready to rally car in the form of the Greatest rally car of all time the Lancia Delta HF Integrale a car that would win 6 WRC Championships it would take the Japanese to finally beat Lancia and thus start the run of cars from Japan that would make up most of the wins in the 90's all been 4WD.
Like anyone as a teenager in 1980 the Quattro was like something form another Planet. there was a Guy who owned one next to were may parent had there Shop in Audi White they were still very rare at that point in the UK.
I was lucky enough to see most of the Group B cars running in anger thanks to my location in the UK hosting several stages of the long gone Lombard RAC Rally so I saw the last two years of Group B so all the main players then the 205 T16 Evo . Metro 6R4 . Lancia Delta S4 the Audi Quattro Sports and the A4 and the Quattro S1 E1 Monster and the Ford RS200 Evo. with even many of the Local Petrol Stations and car parks been used as between Stage servicing points.
great memories of those late 80's rallies and even the return to Group A that followed.
thanks for the video.
Dropping the WRC knowledge! Thank you for watching :)
2:29 AH yes, Ferdinand 🍑
How much was this video inspired by the Grand Tour Video about Audi vs Lancia?
Is it just me or does this channel has very similar style with THE SQUIDD?
The best of best
i understand the whole no rules in group B, but crowd control/barriers doesnt seem as much like rules and more like common sense
@11:16 ....on gravel
tell if im wrong but after the winning streak because Mitsubishi was broke but built the best car the Lancer Evo after the Lancer entered the lancer destroyed the quatro
Wrong era Lancer is from group a and audi from group b (unless you are talking about that one group a audi but it wasnt fast and i think it left before Lancer even existed)
who remembers Delta Integrale?
it's Ferdinand Pee-yekkk!
Have you seen Jason Cammisa’s video on him? It’s fantastic!
@@griffins750 Jason Cammisa is the trio rolled into one
@@janlawrence2303 100%!
Lancia was best even whit 2wd
Magnificent. You just messed up all the pronounciation of all of the namesin the video :D
looking at an SUV quattro now (best rally car ever), when the Lancia Delta was right there. lol
Lancia delta was shit
AI thumbnail goes hard
Not really got it’s ass kicked by 2wd cars in the dry
Yo!!
I have a song stuck in my head. But it’s not really a song, it’s more like
VRAP VRAP BRRRRRRRUUUUUUUAAAARRRRRRRR
RRRRR RRRRR TUKTUK BRRRRRRR
Pietsch 😂😂
made me nauseous to see the cars speeding past spectators standing on the edge of the road with no protective barriers
Legend
So much effort went into making this video. The less I understand why you wouldn't take that insignificant amount of time to check the proper pronunciation of names. This non-attention to detail - standing in stark contrast to the rest - drags the experience down. Anyhow, good luck!
We have been working hard (and improving) on this particular aspect in our more recent videos! Thank you for the feedback and thank you for watching :)
Obviously you're gonna impress everyone who doesn't know any better.
Ignorance is deadly.
The BEAST, THE LANCIA DELTA S4 ENDED GROUP B.
Why?
It's too fast, I can't keep up with it.
That's a direct quote from from Toivonen, the Lancia driver winning the damn race and crashed.
Talk about genius, try turboing and supercharging simultaneously.. the Audi engine went up to 2.5 litre.
Lancia was closer to 1.8...and they achieved over 800hp out of it.
Check out Franz Novak's yellow bull Delta and you'll know what I mean.
I love the Quattro, but let's get really real.😁
This is so obviously a content farm with no real soul. The Thumbnail is AI, and the voice seems text to speech.
Audi Quattro would later dominate and kill the SCCA Trans Am racing series. IMSA GTO, it would dominate only.
you really said that the audi quattro was the perfect car even when the lancia delta s4 exists. the quattros high and upfront center of mass combined with the lack of a center differential made it understeering pig especially in the tight hairpins at the asphalt rallies and even on gravel it was bad, every video you see from gravel stages the car is understeering over oversteering which is not good for speed and control.
Lancia delta s4 also wasnt perfect it was too fast but it was much better then Audi thats for sure in
Lancia Delta S4 entered the chat
And wen Lancia made the S4 simply finish group B because was too powerfull to other ones! Even in WRC were "behind the scene" interests policy
Ai picture
This is such a great Video, but the A.I. mispronouncing names is off-putting... But, great video, still...
AH nice a story about lancia. ow its about VW?
Well made documentary! I hope some car-reactors will use it, so you can have a subcriber-"boost" (STU-STu-Stu-stu) ;)
Haha! Thank you, and fingers crossed for sure
If they didn't let spectators stand in the middle of the track. Maybe it would have lasted a little longer. Idiots...lol.
Very good video, but it wasn't a perfect rally car, the CG was too front...this car won a lot only because it was the only AWD car at the time and they hadn't restriciton on power output.. later on when Audi put the new S2 on group A regulations on 90's, they shamed...
Idgaf I love my b8 s4
Joe way kim santos
It was far from perfect. It has changed the scene and was much faster than 2wd's obviously. But compare to any other awd rallycar (except the BX and 6R4) it was a crap. Heavy, bad dimensions, aweful weight distribution, gearbox failures.... On tarmac it was slower than the rest. Even the 037 beat it.
Good but Lancia was better and the KING always..
Peich is Pee aysh not peech.
Subaru.
Though Subaru was involved in rally racing since the 70s, they didn't make a mark of the WRC until the 95 season when it was between Toyota and Suburu... until Toyota got caught cheating effectively giving Colin McRae the championship in the 555 Impreza.
Unbeatable? 😂
Audi is the most overrated car in Rallye EVER.
Quattro
💋 *Promo SM*