The infantry gets way more hate than it needs. Easily the best HAT kit in the game and the rifles are solid. But their IFVs have no redeeming qualities.
@@lairdperkins That's the ironic part. In 2023, the scimitar was replaced by the Ajax, which is based on the CTAS. The IRL British army has effectively replaced the scimitar with the CTAS. There isn't even any justification for not having the CTAS anymore.
@@babyclifford1759 eh, i wouldnt even say it's "easily" the best HAT kit. even comparing it directly with other HATs, you have to give up utility rounds like frag and smoke, and all you get is that it's easier to aim. It's like.. probably better? Almost certainly better. Almost. You can just get a grenadier for the utility, so when it really comes down to it, the better tandem round is probably worth giving up utility, but for being the entire factions only redeeming factor, it's remarkable that it's not even objectively a positive. When it comes to british army as whole: -All infantry are forced to use scopes -Shit scopes -IFVs have a shit gun and no stabilizer (warriors are pretty tanky though tbf) +but hey, 2 dudes on the team have a slightly easier to use launcher (for one round, the other round is still a LAW). Doesn't really come out even does it?
@ the scopes are not that bad lol they have much less noticeable sway than many of optics of the same magnification. + they were buffed recently with the upgrade to bullpup handling.
@@maxiimaxtv2979I’d argue that hard, it’s 16 heat and 24 frags isn’t it?, with TOWs, the thing is one of my favourites, just need to play a more patient range focused game
If it wasnt worth 10 tickets its pretty nice vehicle, unfortunately in this game you put survivalibity over gun power.
good video but the quality is from many years ago.
Kind of fucked up that people shit on brits because of memes but this faction in game has actually good armor and infantry kits.
The infantry gets way more hate than it needs. Easily the best HAT kit in the game and the rifles are solid.
But their IFVs have no redeeming qualities.
@@babyclifford1759 Yeah they really need to put the CTAS back regardless of real life availability~
@@lairdperkins That's the ironic part. In 2023, the scimitar was replaced by the Ajax, which is based on the CTAS. The IRL British army has effectively replaced the scimitar with the CTAS. There isn't even any justification for not having the CTAS anymore.
@@babyclifford1759 eh, i wouldnt even say it's "easily" the best HAT kit. even comparing it directly with other HATs, you have to give up utility rounds like frag and smoke, and all you get is that it's easier to aim. It's like.. probably better? Almost certainly better. Almost. You can just get a grenadier for the utility, so when it really comes down to it, the better tandem round is probably worth giving up utility, but for being the entire factions only redeeming factor, it's remarkable that it's not even objectively a positive.
When it comes to british army as whole:
-All infantry are forced to use scopes
-Shit scopes
-IFVs have a shit gun and no stabilizer (warriors are pretty tanky though tbf)
+but hey, 2 dudes on the team have a slightly easier to use launcher (for one round, the other round is still a LAW).
Doesn't really come out even does it?
@ the scopes are not that bad lol they have much less noticeable sway than many of optics of the same magnification.
+ they were buffed recently with the upgrade to bullpup handling.
fire your driver
Nah he is still learning
The scimitar is easily the worst ifv in the game imo
i think bmp1 takes worst ifv, and im not talking about the mea bmp1 cause it gets stab.
@@maxiimaxtv2979 scimitar isn't really an IFV but its way worse than BMP 1 because the BMP 1 at least has a usable atgm
@@maxiimaxtv2979I’d argue that hard, it’s 16 heat and 24 frags isn’t it?, with TOWs, the thing is one of my favourites, just need to play a more patient range focused game
The thing is: dont play the Scimitar as and IFV. play it as a rat ambushing everything.
prs z
scim doesnt get stabilizer