Do Manchester City regret selling Cole Palmer to Chelsea?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2024
- ► Subscribe to Sky Sports News: bit.ly/SkySportsNewsSub
Cole Palmer has shone for Chelsea this season, as seen in their 6-0 win over Everton on Monday night. Do Manchester City regret selling the English youngster?
Mark McAdam also discussed whether Chelsea could overtake Newcastle and Manchester United in the race for European football.
#SkySportsNews #SkySports #chelsea
► For the latest developments on this story: qrcode.skysports.com/skysport...
More from Sky Sports on TH-cam:
► Sky Sports Retro: bit.ly/SkySportsRetroSub
► Sky Sports: bit.ly/SkySportsSub
► Sky Sports Football: bit.ly/SSFootballSub
► Sky Sports Boxing: bit.ly/SSBoxingSub
► Sky Sports F1: bit.ly/SubscribeSkyF1
► Sky Sports Cricket: bit.ly/SubscribeSkyCricket
► Sky Sports Golf: bit.ly/SubscribeSkySportsGolf
► To enquire about licensing Sky Sports News content, you can find out more here: www.skysports.com/more-sports... - กีฬา
![[Live] : ONE 167 วันนี้!! "ตะวันฉาย vs โจ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D9_dvfIa6Ao/mqdefault.jpg)
I would say Chelsea regret selling De Bruyne a bit more.
We sold him to Wolfsburg after loaning him to Bremen… He couldn’t get in the team at the time over Hazard, Pedro, and at the time Oscar was in fantastic form. You can’t have every star player, and at the time he wasn’t a star and couldn’t sniff the pitch over those 3
Fyi, Chelsea didn't directly sold De Bryune to City. It's to Wolfsburg in the Bundesliga. Get your facts straight mate😂
City bought KDB from Wolfsburg not Chelsea
And Salah to Roma first not directly to LiVARpool. 😂
Although everyone pointing to the fact that selling kdb was not direct but still it was regrettable to sell salah and kdb. But palmer is a league above foden and will consistently outperform foden and any attacking midfielder city have in coming years
The real question is, do man city regret giving Foden minutes instead of Palmer? Well I don't think they do.
Man city will not bat an eyelid. They have no dearth of world class attackers at their disposal . One slipping through the net isn't a big deal.
Bro plamer single handlely carry Chelsea
They do maybe not everyone. I regretted us selling KDB and Salah although we had Lampard and Hazard.
He's better than Foden though.
@@user-zc2sz1os3j He is not its easy to shine on crap team.
Cole was very brave,, Pep would of benched him for another two years saying he still have lot to learn
You only have to look at Foden to show that's not true. Pep has a way of bringing youngsters into the team and some simply don't want to wait and want the big money moves, Sancho and Palmer are the 2 biggest in recent years and well we know how Sancho went.
Oh like he was gonna waste foden too right?
saewhano he actually said it was Cole’s decision to leave
Cole Palmer football club 6-0 everton
Diaz as well
You can't have them all, no regrets for Citeh for it's a win win situation
As a Chelsea fan who also likes City, I always liked Palmer and was over the moon when we signed him late in the window, he's class.
Citeh 😂😂😂😂😂
@@sbaby-kg8hn hope the message is understood?😂
40 mil is a steal
Funny
It wasn't a win-win for Chelsea when they sold Salah and KDB right? Which players in the Chelsea squad then were they better than?
Here's the truth, most Man City fans were shocked when they heard that Palmer was leaving, myself included. We thought this was gonna be a breakout year for him for us. Now do fans regret it? Not really, not because Palmer isn't good, he's top! But we don't regret it because with or without him we're doing well, we're league leaders and still can win another treble, so what's there to regret? If Palmer was sold to Liverpool or Arsenal and was scoring all those goals to help them win the league, we'd 100% regret it! But the fact that he's at Chelsea who are absolutely zero threat to us, we don't care if he scores 100 goals to be honest! In the future though, should Chelsea be good and compete for the league again and Palmer helps them beat us to it, the answer will be "yes we probably regret it" but as of now the answer is a resounding NO, atleast for me and a lot of City fans I've spoken to share the same sentiment.
Well said
When you say it like that it make sence! But please would you not sign Doku and give the chance to Palmer to partner Foden? I would say yes! Doku ain't palmer level and City made a big big mistake! In buying doku and selling palmer! Period!
What if he helps Chelsea beat Man City in the semifinals of the FA Cup?
🎤💧
@@abolajia it is what it is then you cant win them all
Why would they regret it and they are first in the league, UCL quarter finals and FA cup semis
According to u the chelsea shouldn’t regret selling KDB/salah since they won trophies without them.
@@musbaarKTBFFHChelsea sold those 2 to other clubs first, they didnt go straight to Liverpool and Man City bozo.
@@Notgoodlilbro123 😂 thanks for speaking facts not sure why people think we sold them straight to man city and Liverpool they went to other leagues before coming back to England
@@musbaarKTBFFHexactly. Chelsea still had loads of top players at the time. You end up regretting it later though when they all age. KDB is almost done and even Silva is ageing. Yes they have Foden but realistically they should've looked to built a team with both of them for the future.
@@Notgoodlilbro123ur the bozo that missed what I said. Comprehend b4 u reply.
For gods sake Palmer was never going to really make the squad, he would have been lucky to get 5 goals if he was still at City.
It remains a mistake because of his age. They would not have sold him if they knew then what he could develop into. Especially with KDB and Bernardo ageing a bit.
He almost scored everytime he was deployed to the pitch.
He scored against Shatty already. What is your point? You think Foden is better than Palmer? See the goals
@@maneshipocrates2264when will you understand it's hard to score goals at a team full of stars as well as in ateam where you are the only good player.Not to mention the penalties ...
The future
No there's nothing like regret in this, Chelsea did same to Salah, Debrugne and others is just a path way for the players to show what they have got that's exactly what Palmer is doing nothing like regret in letting a player leave
Good talks, no regret in selling Salah and De Bruyne but keep buying and selling Lukaku 😂
@@mihawkslamsgokuwe won stuff before and after kdb and salah.......check mate
If they didn't let him leave he wouldn't be shinning. Pep always says" if a player wants more minutes and we aren't giving it to him, we are ready to let him leave" and that worked out perfectly for both cancelo and Palmer
First in the League, FA cup semi (against Palmer ironically) and UCL quarter.I think they are fine plus at City he would be a squad player with no penalties it was good for him to go showcase his talent somewhere else.
Its not about city at all. He was a young player in an experienced city team. He made the decision to get more minutes and fair play to the lad. He was great at city but now hes shining at chelsea.
Exactly. Someone has given the lad good advice.
It is not David silva is Bernard silva😅😅😅
Bernardo* Silva
It's Bernardo Silva not Bernard Silva
it's not Bra Silva, it's Bro Silva lol
It's not Bernardo Silva, it's Bernie Silva
Who?
Find out Saturday lol. Would love to see him score. Man glides across the pitch with ease, never looks like he's in a rush but he's always there
Some said they would regret selling Zinchenko and Jesus to Arsenal
It's a bit like when Chelsea sold KDB and Salah. They had instant success but no stability in the long run. Of course City will still win trophies but Palmer has amazing potential and would be incredible if he reached anywhere near the levels of KDB and Salah.
chelsea sold Salah and KDB to other clubs so it's nothing like that.
sometimes you have no real choice but to sell a goodyoung player even when you don't want to, palmer would have had to wait to get his chance at city but football is a short career he didn't want to wait any longer. Sometimes you have just to take the money and reinvest.
City didnt want to sell him. He wanted to leave because he wanted more playing time.
So better question is: did Pep made a mistake not giving him more playing time instead of others?
Considering City won the treble and may win treble again.. NO.
So even better quarion should be: Did Palmer made a mistake leaving City considering he is in mid table team with not so great looking future in sight while City is on their way to win another treble. 🧐
Haha bob on. Typical news outlets stirring it!
Much like KDB chelsea didn't want to sell either, but man wanted to play
I disagree, Chelsea's team, if maintain well, despite their horrendous form of late, are gonna probably absolutely incredible in the years to come.
@@minatodroger7890Wrong comparison. Unlike Morinho, Pep develops players and give them their due if they are patient.
Look at Foden. He didn't get playing time either. But was patient. Now he is banging goals against Real Madrid Infront of record number of Real Madrid fans inside a closed roof.
How can u compare that to banging goals against a relegation team in a team that no one is afraid of so they play more openly than they would against City.
It's his choice. If he wants to be the main guy of a team in crises playing under bad managers or be a contributing member of the best team in the world playing under the best manger of the world who will keep developing him.
@@ntokozosibanyoni1421bruh, they are high mid-table team. They will not be consistent enough to push for titles if you have a manager that can’t even control little kids with egos and that play on pure vibes.
They need a ruthless manager that will get you results every single week.
Looking at City currently, they have nothing to regret!!
They will do further down the line
@@DrBased123 Regret another treble? It's a win-win for every party. City make great profit off of Palmer as h was free before selling him for 40+mil, Palmer gets more game time allowing him to develop faster and Chelsea get a great player.
City has the best academic players I'm a Chelsea fan
City doesnt have an academy
@@kukunase1686 wait what😂😂🥶
@@kukunase1686 City has best acdaemy in the world.
Okay name me City academy players that became good. Let’s seee how many can you name.
Now name Man United Dortmund, Sporting Lisbon, Barcelona
@@jvr6272 Dude you would get destroyed if we named all the Coty academy players today and from the past.
Simple response No.
I doubt it. Chelsea play different football with different players with different needs. City didn’t need Palmer, so he couldn’t flourish. Chelsea do need Palmer so he can and is flourishing.
If City didn't sell him, he might not reach his potential. So, it's win win for everyone.
Imagine selling Palmer and buying Matheus Nunes in the same summer. Thats some shocking business you'd expect from the red side of Manchester.
has that guy even played
Shocking deal that people don’t talk about but we get it he needs a season to get used to the pep way I wonder how that worked out for Phillips
It’s a joke right? City never keeps player who want game time.
Shocking that you think they play in same position
Dufus he wanted to leave and City don't keep players who want to leave.
Thats what red side of Manchester does. Thats how they have so many divas. Pep doesn't like divas.
Without leaving Chelsea, KDB would not have broken through fast and bloomed. Similarly, Cold Palmer had to leave to meet with his special destiny. ❤
9th? All the way from little town called 1st 😂
@masterchief1520 at least he's getting game time 🤣🤣
What a stupid question! City at the top of the league without Palmer. Won three other Prem leagues, cups and Chumps League... WITHOUT PALMER in any true contribution! What does that tell you? It tells you that we are a TEAM not of individual glory.
Give over with this nonsense about regrets. We regret no decisions made about selling players!
Yes, Chelsea won everything without KDB and Salah yet it was bad business. I know you want to support City so much. It was still a bad piece of business! Give it time. If Pep leaves Man City after 2 years then you'll understand that you need your best players.
"We are a team"?
No. THEY are a team. You're not on the team.
@@diligenceeke3023 Oh my gosh! By then, we'll have OTHER players coming through or being bought! Palmer is a BIG fish in a VERY small pond at Chelsea. He was a GOOD player, but that's it.
@@Scottthewholeworldhe’s level with haaland for goals and is equal top scorer. LOL
@@Comatosedpeanut Gee, look at that! Palmer scored as many as Haaland yesterday...
They didn’t make any mistake cos no one saw anything when he was in City. If he didn’t leave he wouldn’t have developed like this with the number of games he’s seeing.
At City he won’t see this number of games to develop.
The same ass question asked of Chelsea on Salah and De Bruyne, when we all know them two couldn’t bench the Chelsea starters at that time.
It’s good Palmer got out and developed to this level.
Yup Chelsea Legend and future Ballon d’Or breaking all goalscoring/assists records 🐌🐌
for some talking trash on foden lol, if your logic is only goals you don't know football, foden has more accuracy than palmer and his advantage and maturity when it comes to technicality and moving the ball around is far more impressive than palmers, if you're talking about goals and you say 10 from penalties and 10 from tap ins are you really using that as leverage to your argument lmao, yes he has more goals but the quality of fodens strikes inside mostly outside the box even are more reliable and his quality proves it, even with foden having a higher shot per goal and shots on target, foden is far more impressive chance creating, assists and passing, this is the kind of work rate world class players have
10 tapins dfkm
Top of the table. Favorites to go through in the UCL and an FA cup final? What exactly are they regretting apart from less money for PSR🤨
I took note of him at the charity shield against Arsenal that he is a phenomenal player.
My friend we sold bigger stars then Cold Palmer.
Mention one
Illay Gundogan, Riyad Mahrez @@ObinnaNoble-jy6ii
@@1neromusiq65both free transfers. Leroy sane ferran Torres there’s 2
@@ObinnaNoble-jy6ii thought of another one cancelo
Who are those
Jesus christ my ears are bleeding, how low have we fell for them to say its a good thing to finally be back, 9th on the table, it hurts physically
6th soon 🐌🐌
@@zetineb88 now thats way better.. if it was Abramovich, and we were sixth, heads would be flying all around the changing room
@@mpkrprsnt yes it takes time with this young team (maybe top 5 next season) 🐌🐌
it's not about the 9th place league position, it's about palmer's strength, maturity and intelligence that caused city to miss the opportunity of his talent
Some players shine with mid table teams. Good on him
City don't regret selling anyone least of all Palmer who's having quite the season. Respect! But if you look at city the sold Mahrez and even Gundo but they seem to manage. Foden has stepped up and De bryune is sensational as always.
If Bernardo or foden were there , they would've scored like palmer did , City do not regret
Really? 😂 Can Bernardo take penalty? 😂 Can Foden make more assist? 😂
Palmer is complete because he can do mostly everything...even pressing and defending
@@onamiofficialu don't know what u r saying
@@onamiofficialTell me U don't know football without saying U don't know football
Pep is regretting it now coz someone they bought on behalf of Cold 🥶 is a flop
What a regrettable biz 😅
YES
It's a debut season if he continues this form season by season he's going to be some thing special
You cannot keep every player, and I think that is kind of the point of PSR, big clubs can't hoard the best talent they grow so it has to circulate
As much as I understand from Pep's statement, Palmer was sold because he was too good to sit on the bench of Man City. Palmer needed full play time to thrive.
And Pep was so right I could cry now...
The underestimated him at Manchester City.
Short answer yes
he's a good player for a mid-team club .. kinda reminds me of when Zaha went to Palace from UTD and he was palace's main man .. he was never gonna get game time there
It’s have a philosophy of allowing players who want to go, to just go. Why would they regret it? Holding players against their will is not the way they run themselves. Same way last year when Zinchenko and Jesus transformed arsenal, even when they were clear like 5 points, they never regret letting players move on for a fair price.
similar circumstances as Sancho, Brahim Diaz, De Bruyne, Salah. Young players just can’t develop in stacked squad. Chelsea just happen to be the right fit, they still experimenting with young guns and Palmer surely the right one for theme.
He’s an Infinite Goal Palmer 💪💙COYB.
As a city fan there’s no regrets in selling him. Palmer wanted to go and we needed the cash. ❤
Have you seen our league position,it's not like he would have been a starter,we are happy for him though
Yes
I don't think city and pep have regrets on selling him coz of the depth and quality they have in their team still but i loved the way palmer took it personally.he destroyed their egos.
In the short term no they have more than enough players to cover. In the long term yes possibly with the rate of progress he's making in such a short amount of time.
Super start 🎉
Maybe not now but possibly in the future.
Who's the guy in the green shirt? Very well spoken and a great voice...
He wanted to leave, Pep said it, and so it's not a problem.
Nobody keeps a player who wants to go.
Well they're now in pretty much pole position to win a second treble in a row in what is considered to be a down season for them. Sounds like they're fine
We dont.
After last night's performance.
Definitely!
this season and last season have been a disaster in terms of the new management. playing so close to the line that they could be docked points and end up in a dire state and poch does not seem to know what he's doing either ... such a tightrope.
Good ebening
Dont get me wrong palmer has been immense for chelsea but we dont know whats to come. I swear these days everyone gets defined by one season.
To recall, Palmer scored in the Community shield and UEFA super cup at the start of this season, so it was inevitable if he had stayed at City and got more minutes he would have had some goals and assists... But luckily for him Chelsea have brought out his full potential😢
Maybe not now, but I feel like that might change in a few years, but not a big massive regret way. Despite Foden really stepping up, I feel like Man City are missing some of the key players who left (which they wanted to leave) Gundogan and Mahrez and I feel like Palmer would have been a great replacement on the right wing for Mahrez. And with Bernardo approaching 30 and KDB over 30, maybe in a few years they might look at Palmer be like 'Wish we would have kept him', but honestly, with their money, they could just buy their replacement without too much fuss. So a tinge of regret considering he came through the ranks and is homegrown, but not really a huge set back
Yes.
I heard some of my mates going on about him being better than Doku. I must admit I thought it quite absurd at the time but I’ve come around to he just may well be.
Yes!!!
Why would they when they're in the position they're in?
Cole is a star. Really impressed me.
Hope they have a buy back clause 🤞
Doesn’t seem to be hampering them much
I guess its worked out well for all 3 parties involved.
Cole got a club where he gets sufficient playing time and is the star man at the club.
City got good money for an academy graduate.
Chelsea got a player that is keeping their hopes of a top half finish alive.
did he actually say david silva instead of bernardo silva??
Personally, I'd think they will based on his prolific run for his first full season with Chelsea, BUT they won't be losing any ground in the EPL title race or sleep for that matter.
People are forgetting.....Pep has mentioned it several times that if a player wants to leave, he's free to do so. Pep success is based on his principles. As long as Pep is with City, City will remain the best football team. Peo believes in player's royalt to the club and his tactics. If you are not abiding to this requirement, you can't be part of Pep's team. It's as simple as that. Every season since Pep joined City, some good players have been leaving City and yet City have been consistent with it's performance
That's what Pep said to you in the media. That's different from what happens in real life.
And other excellent teams will become better than City. Even Pep's Barcelona was dethroned by Madrid and Chelsea. It's a cycle.
Of course they do. They are playing Doku and Grealish on the wings (even if in rotation).
I think selling him was more a financial issue rather than a personal one. They dont need to be on the radar of FFP yet again.
I'm still wondering how city sold him to buy Doku
Doku is good
A player's success is path dependant. If Chelsea does have other fast running and holding players maybe Palmer would not score those goals as he scores them.
To me even from watching Palmer's limited game time it was clear hed be a top player. But im glad hes left City as a liverpool fan
Chelsea fan here. I don't think City should regret letting him go, same way Chelsea should not regret letting players like Salah and De Bruyne leave the club.
Had these players not left, they wouldn't have developed into what they are now. These players HAD to leave.
It's about the surroundings, Chelsea needed Palmer and he fitted perfectly for their needs and their type of play where Palmer filled a hole. Chelsea have a team that belongs higher up in the table, Palmer could well be the one to make a good team great 💙
Man said David Silva 😅
This man has an amazing character to do this transfer, alongside Billingham he is mature for his age.
He said David silva
Well, city are on top of the league, in the ucl quarter finals, fa cup semis and are going for a second treble in a row. I'd say they're fine
Palmer to Chelsea is Saka to Arsenal, important and all but who exactly would they both bench at City? Because of their age people tend to think Saka & Palmer are at Foden's level but forget that Foden proved himself by lifting City when both KDB & Halaand were out for 2months.
Palmer is doing really well in a mid table side, scoring against teams in the bottom six.
Where were Cole Palmer when they draw against Burnely even with red?
Wow
Palmer wasn't gonna get on City's first squad, so I do regret his sales 1 bit. His finishing wasn't as great as well, maybe he is better now, but the judgement is about the rationale behind his sale, which made sense to me.
What we needed was a full back but somehow we never got one.
Chelsea can trade you fullbacks some like Reece James, Ben Chilly or Cucurella 🐌🐌
They don't but the golden-boot race is on.
Palmer wouldnt have had a place to play at City and even if he had.....at Chelsea hes the main man....can do whatever he wants thats why hes successful......
The real question is how good is David Silva apparently still killing it at city
He went a club with actual history and fans, it's a win win
We are even now they have kdn
No.
We decided to give those minutes to foden and he killed that.
And even we knew palmer would be that good he still wont be making into playing xi
I still wont start him over kdb foden or silva
47 million squid of pure profit? I doubt they mind selling a bench player for that money. He would have never gotten the same chances at City. Great move for everyone.
No. I don't think they do. Don't let this form and run that he's on fool you
No; palmer is having to get all the goals for Chelsea. At City, lots of players contribute to the goals. Also, he wasn't getting any playing time at city as Foden plays a similar position
He couldn't get into the City team and wanted to leave.
Surely, Chelsea should be worried a player, who couldn't get minutes at City, is massively out performing all their other signings.
Palmer is untested at the highest level. He might just be a very good mid table player.
Exactly , that’s why we sold KDB and Salah , our squad was too good for them to get in and play … but we got criticized for that years later ….
We did what man city did, pure profit on KDB and Salas was just not good enough at the time
the difference is kdb and salah have gone on to win big trophies. palmer has won nothing
No way they regret this. As good as he's been, the players City are playing in positions he would play in are either just as or more capable than him. As a city fan, I was excited to see him more because it felt like he was on the cusp of getting more first team minutes but I'm happy to see him doing so well at Chelsea as much I despise Chelsea. City made him who he is, Chelsea is where he got to show who he is. Happy for him.