Update on HIGH MILEAGE 2.7L EcoBoost plus brand new 2.7L Bronco. Watch this before you buy a 2.7L!

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 226

  • @UBERPOWNAGE
    @UBERPOWNAGE ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I've clocked 170,000 miles on my 2018 XLT 4x4, and it's been running smoothly with just regular preventative maintenance. Impressively, I've never encountered the first Check Engine Light. I'm running on 295's and still achieving 21 mpg, and I've yet to experience the transmission shifting issues that seem common in discussions. My truck came with the 36-gallon tank, which I absolutely love, as it allows me to cover 700 miles between fill-ups. In terms of towing, I've done about 15,000 miles in total with substantial loads. The 2.7's low torque curve combined with the 10-speed transmission ensures that power is always available when I need it.
    Despite initial advice from friends and family not to purchase a vehicle with the EcoBoost engine, I've been thoroughly impressed by the 2.7 and its construction. Even those who were skeptical at first - some of whom bought a model year newer with the 5.0 or a 3/4 ton with the 6.2 - have been amazed. Despite towing more than both, my vehicle has had fewer issues and has proven incredibly reliable.
    I've been considering getting a tune and fully intend to drive it until it can no longer be driven. This machine has not only met my expectations but exceeded them.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Outstanding! I was reluctant to get the 2.7 I bought in 2018 however I was quickly amazed by the power and efficiency.

    • @trackpackgt877
      @trackpackgt877 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same here bro I wanted a 5.0 V8 cuz trucks are supposed to have V8s. But I came across the perfect truck 2018 everything I wanted already had aftermarket wheels and exhaust 75k miles but it was a 2.7 test drove it fell in love with it paid cash for it that day LOL. I wouldn't give this truck up for anything it's by far the best truck I've ever owned and has completely roached V8 trucks like the hemi coyote ect. I don't know if you got a tuner yet but I put a bully dog bdx in mine and oh my gosh bro it's like downloading horsepower I can't believe Ford would leave this much horsepower and torque on the table to be had my truck is around 390 horse 480 lb ft at the crank now and that's just bully dogs canned 93 octane tune that comes with the tuner you can do better getting a custom tune!

  • @DavidGutierrez-cp1qd
    @DavidGutierrez-cp1qd 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    2017 2.7 STX crew cab- 250,xxx miles. Just replaced the evap sensor. Oil changes and tire rotations. Transmission serviced at 200k. 21mpg on average. First Ford, great truck.

    • @xTheJmanChannel
      @xTheJmanChannel หลายเดือนก่อน

      What all does the transmission service entail? Just fluid flush/replacement? I'm wondering because thats a lot of mileage for just one trans service.

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Nice!

  • @rcunknown5303
    @rcunknown5303 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a 2019 f150 with 2.7l 4x4 and I love this thing. I was worried about a small displacement engine in a truck until I did some research on how the engine was designed and I was sold. Zero issues with the truck and its well maintained. Recommend a tune especially for the Trans to help clean up the shifts. Everyone I know including myself have noticed sometimes the transmission doesn't know what gear to chose. Tuned and no more problems and more power. If your going to run the truck hard upgraded the intercooler to keep intake temps under control. The stock intercooler Robs you of power if its hot out or running the truck hard ie pulling a trailer or wot pulls.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great feedback and you are spot on… it’s a shame an aftermarket company can build a tune that makes the transmission more functional…. It should come ready to go. Oh well… now you get more power too and a transmission that knows what direction to go… thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @BEARTAC0S
      @BEARTAC0S 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What tune do you have? Or tuner? I have a 18 2.7 with 115k zero issues but have noticed the transmission can’t make up its mind sometimes

    • @rcunknown5303
      @rcunknown5303 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BEARTAC0S I have a bama tuner as my device. I have modified cars so I had my local tuner make a map for my truck. I heard there is a couple off the shelf tunes that are really good. I think one of them was lund racing I think it’s called. The transmission used to drive me nuts when it got confused.

  • @fodder_time
    @fodder_time 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We bought a 2016 F150 Supercrew with the 2.7 and it has been great. Currently 113k and the only thing besides routine maintenance items I might replace is the upgraded oil supply line for the turbo. We make regular 2500 mile roundtrips between Texas and Georgia about 4 times per year now and I’m extremely confident in this truck!

  • @lil2.74
    @lil2.74 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    Mine has 211.xxx miles on it. Still has original turbos, timing chain and cam phasers. I replaced the ignition coils at around 205,xxx miles as preventative maintenance. My truck has been tuned since around 100,xxx miles and is currently running on e50. Has run a 12.59 in the quarter mile and has averaged 18.2 mpg over the last 14,xxx miles on e50. 2016 Supercrew 4wd. I have lots of videos, check it out. That truck is still looking good!

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow outstanding!

    • @lil2.74
      @lil2.74 ปีที่แล้ว

      @The Overdrive Consumer Channel Shes been a good one. Love my truck. Looking forward to the next 200K. Fixing to put stage 3 turbos on it to replace these high mileage ones. Should make near 100 additional horsepower on its already 420whp. Might be the only 1st gen 2.7 Supercrew in the country able to run a 11.xx in the quarter soon, not sure it may only go low 12. Certainly the only one with over 200K. If the motor ends up going out at some point I will just drop in another one and keep on trucking.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s cool. I’ll check out your channel.

    • @Jdp313
      @Jdp313 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      just bought a 2015 with 60k miles. its my first truck. Came with a some bf goodrich t/a tires and it has a 2.7, which i understand it s the first gen of the motor. I was thinking about putting a catch can system in it. But ive been told not really needed.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Jdp313 I would put a catch can on a 2015. IMO it will help caking on the valves since those motors were direct injection only. In 2018 they started installing dual injection so it’s not as important as the 2015-2017 models. I have several videos on catch cans. Congratulations on the new ride! I hope it serves you well!

  • @poppyneese1811
    @poppyneese1811 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Probably the second or third time I’ve watched this video, I just read all the comments and the one thing a non-mechanical guy like myself can pick up is the key is timely maintenance.Still a great video love hearing from real owners!👍👍👍👍👍, I’m on my second 2.7 Ecoboost powered F150 and just like the first did till I traded at 94k running like a top, I’m so so on the 10 speed though, seems to hunt a lil more and Ford softened the throttle response a little compared to my 17, Absolutely love Broncos, I’ll never have one but their like a super model walking by, can’t take my eyes off them.

  • @michaelH0000
    @michaelH0000 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    The 2.7 if taken care of can literally run easily over 300k

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I concur… thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @TreesOnTheBeach
      @TreesOnTheBeach ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 A lot of problems with the Bronco's 2.7 has come out. Do you still think it's going to be reliable long-term?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@TreesOnTheBeach I still believe the 2.7 is and will continue to be a good engine. Keep in mind with new models there will be issues that pop up. The bronco offers a smaller space in which Ford had to make some changes from the f150. Little things like relocating hoses or parts can make a difference. I'd give it a couple years like I would any other model change.

    • @TreesOnTheBeach
      @TreesOnTheBeach ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 I hope you're right! I ordered my Bronco two years ago... it's finally being built next month as a 2023 model. So it's had a couple of years now, but I don't have faith that Ford has figured out all their problems. I think they're a good company, but feel like they are cranking out the Broncos as fast as possible right now. Would like to see them slow down and work on QC.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I advise paying the bones to get the Ford ESP warranty. One claim could just the cost. Our ESP plan on our 2019 expedition has paid for itself more than twice.

  • @evanlebaron9465
    @evanlebaron9465 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a 2018 2.7. Coming up on 280k still runs strong

  • @rogeriopimenta6247
    @rogeriopimenta6247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This model is gorgeous! it looks more masculine than the newers.

  • @pedrob559
    @pedrob559 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    My friend has a 2015 i believe it is 2.7L with 230k miles no issues

  • @tommyboy0379
    @tommyboy0379 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video was very helpful in making a decision about buying new. the high interest and high prices were bad enough but i still thought about buying at 70,000 but not anymore. Thanks for saving me thoushand and a car payment that equals a morgage.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's ridiculous the cost of new and all the costs that go along with them. Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching.

  • @gladegoodrich2297
    @gladegoodrich2297 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Truck dealer for 30 years. Owned and sold thousands of trucks. My 2022 F150 4x4 crew is the best truck I have owned!

  • @Roc91Nation
    @Roc91Nation 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the exact same F-150, appreciate the information

  • @anthonydeangelis9366
    @anthonydeangelis9366 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I'm running 35's with 3.73 gears on a 6" lift averaging 18mpg on my 2020 F150 2020 2.7L.

  • @oliverramclam6009
    @oliverramclam6009 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That 2.7 ford ecoboost is built boy . Very good motor

  • @BS-kh8ek
    @BS-kh8ek ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I picked up a very cheap 2018 xlt 300a with over 250,000 on it for a winter beater a couple years ago. And it’s as tight as my 2018 5.0 with 45,000 on it.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s a tank of an engine… I think Ford has had great success with it! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

  • @garrettmeilinger1865
    @garrettmeilinger1865 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a 2015 XLT with the 2.7L.
    233xxx miles, turn the key and drive. I do have turbo wastegate rattle but I just turn the radio up and cruise! The 2.7 seems to be reliable and runs strong yet!

  • @jimblackbird5678
    @jimblackbird5678 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    2012 F150 3.5 ecoboost. Avg mileage 17.3. Smooth as the day I got it. And no rust so far in Ohio. It’s a keeper.

  • @Yeahdude1992
    @Yeahdude1992 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just bought a 2017 XLT with 94,950 miles… glad to know i have plenty of life in it!

  • @evanl889
    @evanl889 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The way I looked at it is according to some info I found it seems the average time a turbo goes out on these is around 140-160k miles if they do go. Ford seems to charge about $1700 for a single turbo replacement with parts and labor. If I can get away with a $2k repair with 140k miles that’s not bad at all.

  • @gilbertferguson1685
    @gilbertferguson1685 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice video. How is the Bronco doing mpg wise? I had a four door Bronco with the 2.3 engine and could only manage 18 mpg. I now have a two door Bronco with the 2.7 engine and on a recent trip saw 21 mpg, but that was mostly on back roads. Keeping it under 70 mph definitely helps. Thanks.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do not own the Bronco but reports on the Bronco are reporting similar MPGs to what you are reporting as the gearing and 4wd sucks some of the mpg numbers down.

  • @theinternets7516
    @theinternets7516 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    22% fuel efficiency decrease is a hard pill to swallow if your not actually going off road. If this thing is just a commuter/road tripper I'd be putting the original wheels and some HT tread tires back on it. Keep the other ones in the garage and just put them on and use them as needed.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great advice! I know some people that do that. I’ll pass that along. Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @davidlmatteson
      @davidlmatteson 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Imagine telling a grown man what to do with his own property

  • @silverhorder1969
    @silverhorder1969 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would definitely trust the 2.7 over the 3.0 liter. Although when you said it was an upgrade for the Bronco motor I was shocked. I figured it would be be standard for the Bronco.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It should be the standard for the Bronco… I wonder about the thought process from
      Ford regarding this... Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching.

    • @BuffBroc
      @BuffBroc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Bronco standard engine is rhe 2.3 I4 because the manual gearbox won't hold up to the torque of the 2.7 Ecoboost. It's also cheaper to produce so having that lower cost engine as standard equipment helps with sales.

  • @ck4391
    @ck4391 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I believe the 2018 and above 2.7L Ecoboosts switched to a wet belt driven oil pump. I'm really interested in how the new gen engines and those belts are holding up

  • @dbackhusker
    @dbackhusker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    BTW - if those tires are oversized from the originals, he’s likely getting over 20mpg. Do an odometer check on the interstate with the mileage markers. Mine shows 0.9 miles for every mile traveled (dead on 9.0 miles for 10 mile markers).

  • @LarryRichelli
    @LarryRichelli 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So many trucks on Craig's list the only say 6 cal. I know that the 2.7 is way better than the 3.5 so I wish I had info on when they use the 2.7 and when they used the 3.5.

  • @brandonbuck1696
    @brandonbuck1696 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    A few of my friends had the 3.5 has had turbo problems leaks

  • @whiterhinooutdoors4572
    @whiterhinooutdoors4572 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I came to this video I was worried I just bought a 2018 2.7 xlt 4x4 so far I love the truck but I bought it with 50k miles and have been worried cause post and people say after 60k or 80k miles timing chain needs replaced I have no idea what that cost but I’m sure it’s high and post about carbon build up anyways this is why I checked you video out to see one with high millage and your review sure hope mine does last as long as yours has i traded in my 13 z71 in towards this used 18 f150 I’m loving the 22 mpg I’m averaging so far truck feels like it has more power than my z71 just wondering about reliability I had the z71 6 years 144k miles just 02sensor replacement and HVAC replaced which cost me a boat load and never worked right otherwise I would have probably keep that truck

    • @BS-kh8ek
      @BS-kh8ek ปีที่แล้ว +4

      2.7 doesn’t have the timing issues like the 3.5. Just do oil changes on time and you’ll be fine.

    • @kyleh3972
      @kyleh3972 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For the carbon build up, put a catch can in and you should have no issues.

    • @whiterhinooutdoors4572
      @whiterhinooutdoors4572 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@kyleh3972 thanks man looking into it so far liking the 2.7 seems to have more power than my 13z71

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’ve got a couple videos on catch cans if you’d like to see installed. I agree with the guys get you one! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

  • @JTPerformanceSynthetics
    @JTPerformanceSynthetics 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice Rig! I’m hoping to get 300k+ on mine. Consider running AMSOIL Signature Series in it with a catch can. 🤙🏽

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pennzoil synth is my go to… it meets ford specs, has proven to protect and last. Why would I swap to Amsoil? Last I checked they were not approved/recommended for use in fords. Specifically, Ford spec WSS-M2C946-B1, WSS-M2C946-A.

    • @JTPerformanceSynthetics
      @JTPerformanceSynthetics 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I completely understand, you have experience with Pennzoil and you like what you like. I was die hard Mobile 1 user before I started using Amsoil. @projectfarm does a great video testing Amsoil vs Pennzoil, among others too, I’ve learned and seen that Amsoil has always tested better than others, which is why personally I made the switch. @bankspower also has some great content from Gale Banks regarding the performance and protection of Amsoil. I do appreciate and enjoy this video you made. Here’s the spec sheet that does say Amsoil is comparable and meets those specific applications you mentioned:
      amsoilcontent.com/ams/lit/databulletins/g2880.pdf

    • @JTPerformanceSynthetics
      @JTPerformanceSynthetics 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As much as I love the 2.7 and I’m a huge fan, I am anxious now because I did learn that Ford used a belt for the oil pump and not a chain.🤦🏽‍♂️

    • @ksamos
      @ksamos 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have heard something along those lines and I understand there is some kind of “political” reason for lack of a better word as to their not getting some of the “industry ratings”. Their product is excellent and proven. I have a 2014 F-150 STX with the 3.7L NA V6. Certainly no powerhouse, just my service truck for my business. Currently have about 239K miles and still running like a champ, zero engine issues. Been using Amsoil from day 1. I did just have the tranny rebuilt about 4K miles ago as a precaution due to some issues on cold starts getting stuck in 5th gear for a moment. Most likely it was a valve train or main lead issue, but better to over repair than have another issue. Pensoil makes an excellent product as well for a competitive price. Keep doing what you are doing if it’s working. Bottom line is keeping up with regular maintenance. Happy truckin’. ​@@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424

  • @jlo1947
    @jlo1947 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Have 84,580 on my 2018 XLT 2.7 Crew Cab 19 city and 23-25 highway. Lots of trips mainly highway driving, oil changes, Tires 275.65.18 and brakes. Made a mistake not replacing spark plugs at 40,000+, it will need coolant and transmission flush soon. don't make the same mistake I did by not replacing spark plugs at 40,000, finally replace at 70,000 and they were shot!

  • @gen-zeke-8571
    @gen-zeke-8571 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I may just grab a 2.7. 200,000 is the magic number, but with proper care and some luck 200,000 is highly likely. I'm going for a 2012 Toyota Tundra. The Coyote makes me nervous as does the 3.5 EB. I feel like people people are less likely to rag on a 2.7, or Tundra. If we would only think of the next guy when taking care of a truck. That could be somebody's way to work, and through everyday life. I had an '03 F150 that was fine, but I took it through deep water and it wasn'tthe same. At 45 now, I'm looking for a modest bare bones truck with FWD for here in Michigan.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The coyote has definitely had some problems and the 3.5 too. The biggest problem with the 3.5 eco is cam phasers and it appears they have resolved that with the new design. My 23 f150 is a 3.5 and my wife's expedition is a 3.5 however it just had a cam phaser job done under warranty. It's running like a champ. Obviously I’m a big fan of the 2.7 L but do the towing. I need the big 3.5 eco. My 18 2.7 ran like a champ with zero issues.

  • @Johnsmith46392
    @Johnsmith46392 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s impressive he got that mileage while changing oil every 7500 miles. I’d be afraid to wait that long especially with turbos.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He’s over 200k now! I agree! I do no more than 5k on both my EcoBoost with full synthetic oil.

    • @trackpackgt877
      @trackpackgt877 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amsoil ...... thats what i run and do 7k mi oil changes with blackstone labs oil analysis reports.

    • @ralpheisenbath103
      @ralpheisenbath103 หลายเดือนก่อน

      7500 too far between oil changes !!!

    • @trackpackgt877
      @trackpackgt877 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ralpheisenbath103 depends on the oil and other factors my oil is still ok at 7k+ miles still having a TBN and not to fuel diluted. that's why oil analysis are great!

  • @dylanb2412
    @dylanb2412 ปีที่แล้ว

    I gotta 2020 f150 2.7 xlt with 45,000 only thing ive done to it is oil change. You think i should do a multi-point inspection soon?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wouldn’t do anything major at 45k. Oil changes, tire rotations, and air filters. Highly recommend full synthetic oil!

  • @gen-x-zeke8446
    @gen-x-zeke8446 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm going to attempt to talk my wife into an STX trim XL for the simplicity. This is an important video for keeping an open mind for long-term. Fords are generally good trucks and if the old 4.6s/5.4s (2 valve) can last over 250,000 miles I don't see why these can't. I just wonder about overall. I'm not concerned with looks.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Talked to my buddy just the other day and he’s 4000 miles from 200k. I will definitely have a 200k video!

    • @gen-x-zeke8446
      @gen-x-zeke8446 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 I had a 2001 Expedition with 276,000, and an '03 F-150 with 268,000, and both with 5.4 2v. I expect these EBs to last that long.

  • @donm3844
    @donm3844 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice truck, I had a 2020 2.7 f150 4x4 with 3.55 gears and extra fuel capacity, my mileage was never over 16 mpg ,I drove 90 percent highway and had it in the shop 2 times to see if they could do anything about the milage and they said keep driving it its running fine , I did but it never in reased and I finally sold it due to the poor mileage, I was going to see about a shop doing a tune on it to get it running as Good as possible but never got around to it but overall the truck was fantastic, I never had a issue, I changed oil every 5000 miles and was very pleased except for my mileage that never got better , it's good to see the reliability is good and mine was to , I would recommend the 2,7 engine ,I just got that 1 in 100 that was probably not up to par

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hate you didn’t get good mileage… I was able to get good mpg with the 2.7 I had but rarely as good as they say you can get. Mine was a 2018. Best MPG was 23 but was regularly 20. Of course where you live and drive impacts the overall number as well. Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @donm3844
      @donm3844 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @The Overdrive Consumer Channel yes, I had talked to people with the 2.7 before I bought mine and a lot of them reported well over 20 highway , I had mine at the dealer and they just said nothing was wrong and keep driving it ,but what I did was scan the live data myself and noticed my long term fuel trim on 1 side was 2 and the other side was around 15 , so it's not enough difference to throw a code ,but was showing me there was a issue , that's why I was wanting to take it to a professional tuner to see if they could change the tune and balance it out because both sides should be below 5 generally if its running normal , I just never got to it , like I said I liked the truck, the engine ran like a sewing machine and it was comfortable to drive, so I just figured I got the one bad egg and moved on, but i still would recommend that engine and truck because I know a lot of happy 2.7 owners

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I hate when the dealers say they can’t do anything if there isn’t a light. That’s bull in my opinion especially when you have data supporting the complaint.

    • @donm3844
      @donm3844 ปีที่แล้ว

      @The Overdrive Consumer Channel yes, and that's the dealer for you, and it's not just Ford it's all of them, when I seen the data I went and took the MAF sensor out and cleaned it ,then do the reset on it, and let it run and no change, so I felt it may have a leaking O Ring on a fuel injector possibly, either way one bank was running rich and to narrow it down I would need a better scan tool to read injector output to figure out what one to take out ,But either way I moved on and hope nobody else has an issue

    • @paulhunter9613
      @paulhunter9613 ปีที่แล้ว

      @remster11
      The 16-18 mpg figures you give are from older trucks that don’t have the technology and 10 spd transmission like todays trucks.I kept a log on my ‘98 dodge I just sold two yrs ago that had every gal of gas put into it and the mpg. Hand calculated. It would get 11/18
      I bought a 2.7 2018, supercrew, 2 wd, 3.55 gear , f150 to replace the dodge and so far have kept the same records. It’s pretty consistent with 19 mpg city/suburb driving. I just got back from an ohio to Houston trip , over 3000 mi, and got mpg figures of 22 mpg, 24 mpg , and 26 mpg on the tanks of 87. The first tank at 22 was because I was driving into a constant 30 mph headwind. And I drove at around 73-75 mph. And the 26 mpg tankful was actually at 77 to 83 mph for most of it. Again hand calculated. So these trucks can get fantastic mpg , the truck has about 25,000 mi on it

  • @drz400sm5
    @drz400sm5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2017 2.7 4x4 factory 20 inch wheels. 17 mpg is normal for me. 3.55 rear end gears.

  • @vegasstang1
    @vegasstang1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just bought a 2019 Lincoln Continental with the 2.7. Is that the same engine that the trucks got? This car only has 2k miles on it. Bought the 10 year ESP and looking forward to many trouble free miles!

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right on! I bet that Lincoln rips! 2,000 miles? Wow it’s like brand new! Keep me updated! Thanks for watching!

  • @treethompson
    @treethompson ปีที่แล้ว

    I am in the market for buying a used truck and as of today I just started seriously considering the 2.7 eco-boost. I’ve found one that’s a 2015 crew cab 4x4 2.7 with 176k miles on it and they’re asking $16k for it. Its a 1 owner clean CARFAX truck. It’s at a lot not a individual so doubt there’s much wiggle room for the cost. What’s your thoughts on it? I don’t really tow at all except for our zero turn occasionally on my dads 6x12 trailer so not really anything at all in terms of towing. Seems like most things I’m seeing are positives on this engine and I only drive about 5-7k miles a year so not much miles getting racked up in my case which is why I’m considering a higher mileage purchase and also I’m trying to stay around that price range. Thanks for the video!

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That sounds like a perfect truck for what you are talking doing. You'll also enjoy pretty decent MPG while not towing! If it all checks out I'd jump on it.

    • @treethompson
      @treethompson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 appreciate the feedback!

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@treethompson anytime!

    • @stevedavanzati5855
      @stevedavanzati5855 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@treethompsonjust wondering if you pulled the trigger on a truck like in your comment? I’m trying to stick with a 15k budget and hoping to get a 15-17 f150 for the rust free aluminum factor. I’m in Pennsylvania and salty winters killed my last truck. Everything I find though is bare minimum 150k miles if not closer to 200k.

    • @treethompson
      @treethompson 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stevedavanzati5855 i actually didn’t end up going this route. I couldn’t find one close enough to me that fit my criteria and I ended up going with a 2016 Ram 1500 5.7 hemi. Pretty crazy difference from considering a 2.7 f150 I know. But like I said I couldn’t find what I was looking for so I decided to look at some other options and after test driving the Ram I really liked it and went with it. So I’m not really any help for you unfortunately. Good luck in your search though!

  • @louisdefunes8952
    @louisdefunes8952 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Bronco for me(if i had the money😜)..maybe in another color..the yellow Bronco i like. Nice yellow..my taste at least..

  • @pinoyhandymanofalltrades
    @pinoyhandymanofalltrades 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is amazing guys i have 2016 2.7 XLT twin turbo eco. Mileage of 31k plus I LOVE MY TRUCK NOW I HAVE IDEA THAT THIS TRUCK RUN FOR A LONG TIME 👍🏻🇺🇸🇵🇭 thx for the nice video

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Full synthetic motor oil is definitely a must to get high mileage! They are great engines! Enjoy! Thanks for watching!

  • @johncallis5181
    @johncallis5181 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What kind of exhaust does he have? I want to do something with my exhaust but don’t know what option to go with.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Factory exhaust! Some manufacturers have demo videos… check a couple YT for sound clips! Thanks for watching!

  • @SR-tx3dj
    @SR-tx3dj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m planning to replace my 2014 Silverado 5.3 with a 100k mile 2019 f150 2.7, should I stick w a newer Silverado or go for the f150. I don’t haul much just tools ladder saw for work

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Um…. I carefully suggest that you drive both to compare. Knowing what I know about GM products right now I’d go Ford. If you have an option with the ford buy an extended warranty to cover any issues with that 10-speed transmission. Your gut won’t let you down. You’ll know.

    • @barrya.6212
      @barrya.6212 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your 5.3 could start blowing lifters at any time $$$$$$...GM ruined that great engine in 2007 with AFM style lifters.... On the F150's with the 3.5 just avoid 2017 - 2020 as those years have cam phaser issues.... apparently no stand out issues with any years of the 2.7 except one's shoe-horned into the new bronco's ...I think they did the same lame thing and those have internal water pumps due to NO ROOM....but in the F150's all water pumps are normal / exterrnal ....2.7 and 3.5 's

  • @joeybeljb123
    @joeybeljb123 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is the engine hours/idle hours on this truck

  • @MrCrd783
    @MrCrd783 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a 2017 2.7 that has 236xxx miles with only a evap purge solenoid changed.

  • @dacna01
    @dacna01 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a school of thought that F150 made in a certain plant are more reliable than the other plant, or is 2.7 just a better engine no matter where it is built?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have heard a couple of folks mention that but I do not believe it’s factual. The motors all have their specs and that’s what they are built to. QC at the sites should be checking for the same things so I believe at the end of the day that doesn’t matter.

  • @Yeahdude1992
    @Yeahdude1992 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the 2.7 on my 2018 STX SuperCab. Gas averages close to 17 (i drive like an ass) and i only have 30,000 miles on it.

  • @ZeroPlanB
    @ZeroPlanB 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I talked shit when the eco boost came out. Got rid of my ram 1500 due to gas mileage reasons for a suv. Now that I miss having a truck the 2.7 is catching my interest especially it being out for so long, it’s iron block, and the high mileage reviews I see

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's solid for sure! I loved the 18 I had with the 2.7. I towed with it and it held its own! Great mpg to boot. I believe I got up to 23 mpg avg for an entire tank.

  • @jamiekelley4020
    @jamiekelley4020 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    there is a 2016 Ford f-150 xlt with the 2.7l ecoboost for sale near me. It has 162,000 miles and is a supercrew with new tires and oils. Asking 18k. Worth it?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's a great year for the truck but make sure you check out the truck. Drive it, and check maintenance records. There are so many variables… but if the truck was well maintained… it should be solid.

    • @8corymix8
      @8corymix8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 I'm looking at a '19 with the 2.7. it has 206k miles. I'm hoping to get him down to $16k. A deal, or am I better served with a '15 to '17 5.0? I'm torn

  • @larrygreca3082
    @larrygreca3082 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dang, u need to rotate the tires on that 150 or a front end alignment.

  • @Alex-mw9un
    @Alex-mw9un ปีที่แล้ว

    I hope I’m commenting on this saying zero issues when I have well over 200k miles on my 22’ f150 supercrew 2.7L!

  • @Shredsac
    @Shredsac 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did the f150 have an exhaust or was that stock?

  • @blackericdenice
    @blackericdenice 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People find it hard to believe a 2.7 will last this long because of old school people like Scotty Kilmer. He thought Ford was going to fail. GM and Toyota has done the same thing. I bought my 2016 F165 new (F150 2.7 aka 165 cuin). It has 97k miles and I replaced a $20 coolant temp sensor @ 69k miles. I change my oil myself when the computer get to 15%. I have gone 8,900 miles before I change the Motorcraft 5w30 synthetic blend oil. I still don't have to add oil between oil changes. I did drop the transmission pan and filter @ 87k miles. The only other thing I did was use HP Tuner to raise the top speed to 120 mph. For some reason, the stop/start don't work anymore but I never liked it anyway.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You nailed it! It's way of thinking… the proof is in the pudding. Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

  • @framusburns-hagstromiii808
    @framusburns-hagstromiii808 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not so sure you would get those results in a cold climate like where I live....after a while having to start at -20, -30 or -40 below temps..i think the turbos will probably give it up and i have heard actual experienced mechanics insist the oil change interval must be shortnened...to Like every 4k miles...in order to prolong turbo life...im skeptical....

  • @tankdawg88
    @tankdawg88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a 2015 Expedition EL with 3.5L Ecoboost with 170k. No major problems. Kept up on all maintenance. Original turbos and everything. My engine runs quieter than this 2.7

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Outstanding! Maintenance is key! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @timradke7775
      @timradke7775 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Every 3.5 I have heard is way louder than my 2.7

    • @tankdawg88
      @tankdawg88 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@timradke7775 maybe I'm just lucky? My mechanic once complimented how quiet it sounds.

  • @calvint3419
    @calvint3419 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    did you change transmission oil ?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don’t know. I do know it was a stickler for doing all the required maintenance. I can ask him!

    • @calvint3419
      @calvint3419 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 thanks!

  • @villarreal672
    @villarreal672 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    son buenas yo tengo una f150 del mismo color 2015 2.7

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ¡Pendiente! ¿Cómo te gusta hasta ahora? ¡Gracias por tomarte el tiempo de comentar y mirar!

  • @urieltorres9624
    @urieltorres9624 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this a 10 speed ?

  • @918Mitchell
    @918Mitchell 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm intrigued by the 2.7
    I want a truck that do at least 500K miles because I don't want to buy another truck if I'm spending high dollar on one

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To be honest that a lot to ask from any modern vehicle. They are only engineered to have a life of 150k miles. That is the life of the vehicle. I’m not saying you can’t do it but it would be a challenge IMO.

    • @Paul-fk8qy
      @Paul-fk8qy 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      My Ridgeline has 250k. Yeh it's "not a truck" but it's just not going to die. It will rust into dust before she blows up.
      I overload it and skip oil changes constantly

  • @colingoldthorpe5918
    @colingoldthorpe5918 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I got 64,000 miles on my 2016 F150 I think i got a lot of life left in my Truck !!!

  • @chrisolbrycht9858
    @chrisolbrycht9858 ปีที่แล้ว

    What fuel do you use

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว

      87 octane, nothing special. Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching. Let me know if you have any more questions!

    • @controlavirus9839
      @controlavirus9839 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The book for my 2.7 says use the best gasoline that you can get. At minimum says 87. In summer and when towing it performs the best with 91/92 octane

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@controlavirus9839 I’ve also had good luck with high octane while towing.

  • @SeKeshtuMePelqen
    @SeKeshtuMePelqen ปีที่แล้ว

    3.5l or 2.7l ?

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It depends... Need to tow heavy go 3.5. Don't need to tow heavy (less than 7500 lbs.) and want good MPG got 2.7L.

  • @kirk189
    @kirk189 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have 286,700 on my 2015

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว

      Outstanding! Have you had to replace anything?

    • @kirk189
      @kirk189 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 I have had to replace a oxygen sensor and that’s it! Other than regular wear items

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kirk189 that's awesome! I love the 2.7 it's such a good build. Of course, there are little things that could be better but overall it's solid. Thanks for the feedback!

  • @RayTuttle-of5qd
    @RayTuttle-of5qd 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Time for the boneyard! It sounded terrible like it was eating itself would not recommend Ford can keep em

  • @saintmaquina671
    @saintmaquina671 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have a 2016 with 2.7, have had a turbo replaced because of oil consumption and blue smoke at startup , had the rear differential blow out the carrier bearing as well this all under 80,000 i dont tow and religiously maintain it since new. Purchased it new and am very unsatisfied with it, currently has 90,000 and it starting to smoke again at start up. i payed 45 grand for it and wish i bought a tundra. My warranty just expired and hopefully nothing else goes out because this bastard is nickle and diming me. Oh and almost forgot panaramic sunroof replaced 3 times for leaks and it still leaks!!! last ford ill ever buy....

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I understand the frustration…. That’s a horrible experience and I hate you went through that.

    • @carbonking53
      @carbonking53 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The new Tundra's have a long list of issues that is getting longer by the day.

  • @brandonbuck1696
    @brandonbuck1696 9 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Mother law 2018 65000 miles dies on her dies on her turbo replacement

  • @stuffjunk5019
    @stuffjunk5019 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch out if you own a Gen 2 2.7. They have that shitty belt that runs the oil pump instead of a chain like the gen 1.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point. I am not aware of any issues with the people I work with and my local ford dealer. Perhaps they had some bad lots? Manufacturing today is sketchy at best! Thanks for taking the time to comment and for watching!

    • @stuffjunk5019
      @stuffjunk5019 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 They haven't had issues yet because the engines are still too new, they may not have issues in the amount of time people keep vehicles these days. If you wanna run it to 300k like i plan to do with mine i could see it being an issue though.

    • @8corymix8
      @8corymix8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gen 2 is the '18 & newer, correct?

    • @stuffjunk5019
      @stuffjunk5019 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@8corymix8 yes

    • @8corymix8
      @8corymix8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@stuffjunk5019 I wonder if that'll be an issue? The gen 1 had a chain?

  • @georgewettig1860
    @georgewettig1860 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    looks like it has the capacity to tow a microwave oven. I wouldn't touch this girlie truck to save my life.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      7k pound towing capacity isn't too bad for a highly efficient and economical engine. To each their own.

    • @8corymix8
      @8corymix8 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stick with the Dodge & see how far that gets you. LoL. I've literally heard nothing about people having issues with the 2.7.

  • @robm3357
    @robm3357 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch out for the dreaded wet belt failure

  • @justinjones7238
    @justinjones7238 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    180k is not high mileage.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Thanks for the comment. Actually it is. Here’s why, two reasons. First, the manufacturer’s “life expectancy” for our vehicles is 150k miles, that’s what they engineer vehicles work reliably to. Obviously modern vehicles can exceed that. Lastly, anything over 75k miles is considered “high mileage.” I don’t personally consider 75k to be high mileage but is considered to be.
      Last statement the reason this video is important. EcoBoost are constantly being criticized because they have turbos etc. zero mechanical issues for 180k is comparable to the v8s. Nice Ram by the way.

    • @Mark-zz9rt
      @Mark-zz9rt ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For a Ford it is 😊

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mark-zz9rt oof 😂

    • @lil2.74
      @lil2.74 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      180K is far above what the average vehicle has at its age....such as mine with 200K when it turned 6. So at 12 theoretically it will have 400K. Thats not record setting but none the less high mileage. I can assure you that buyers aren't looking for a vehicle that has 180 to 200k on it at 5 or 6 years old. Including you.

    • @controlavirus9839
      @controlavirus9839 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My 3.5 2012 model had 352,500 on it. When sold it. No joke. Water pump failure-coolant issues/ dumbass ignoring problem for 2 days (me) messed it up. But still going. Just loss of power

  • @LouisianaBayouLife
    @LouisianaBayouLife หลายเดือนก่อน

    Biggest REGRET OF MY LIFE. I knew better. I Fu@king knew better. But I bought a ecoboost. 2.7 f150. I love the truck. But I HATE THE LOW POWER 2.7. it is trash. 3 months and I'm parking it covering it. Going back to my 2015 v8 XLT. THAT HAS FULL POWER HAS NO LAG.
    4x4 is useless on A 2.7. Sounds like a Lil girls car. No top end at ALL. AND 4 TO 6 SECOND LAG ON TAKE OFF. I DO KNOT FELL SAFE ON INTERSTATE DRIVING THIS GARBAGE. The 2.7 struggled to tow my bass boat. In fact did better in regular mod. Tow mod is useless. It is a motor that should never been on a Man's truck.

    • @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424
      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry the 2.7 didn’t work out for you. It’s possible you got a bad one…

    • @LouisianaBayouLife
      @LouisianaBayouLife 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @theoverdriveconsumerchanne4424 spends more time at Ford then it does with me. They say I'm expecting to much out of the 2.7. That the lag is normal. And that the power is normal. Well if that's normal. Then 2.7 is a joke . And the joke is on me 47,000.00 joke thanks Ford.

    • @Paul-fk8qy
      @Paul-fk8qy 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Never seen someone this mad at an engine that hasn't exploded. Wait until your 10 speed blows up dude.

    • @LouisianaBayouLife
      @LouisianaBayouLife 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @Paul-fk8qy notice I said I parked that POS. HAVE NOT PUT ANOTHER MILE ON IT. ITS YARD ART. LMAO TRASH.