Here’s What Women Look for in a Man
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.พ. 2023
- A study showed that men prefer visual pornography while women prefer literary pornography, what does that say about what they are attracted to in a partner?
Dr. Delroy Paulhus is a personality researcher whose work in dark personality traits, via a variety of psychometric methods, has yielded measures of the Dark Tetrad. His work has also validated measures of socially desirable responding, perceived control, free will and determinism, and over-claiming. His work has been published in over 150 articles and books, and his current citation count exceeds 43,000.
Watch the full episode here: Ep. 327 - • Women, Porn, and Sadis...
Dr Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: utm.io/ueSFn
// SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL //
Premium Podcast - jordanbpeterson.supercast.com/
Newsletter: linktr.ee/DrJordanBPeterson
Donations: jordanbpeterson.com/donate
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
// LINKS //
Website: jordanbpeterson.com
Events: jordanbpeterson.com/events
Blog: jordanbpeterson.com/blog
Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/podcast
// SOCIAL //
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus #podcast #news #TheJordanBPetersonPodcast
As a pilot I got excited for a minute then the rug got pulled out. Such an emotional roller coaster. Keep putting out good stuff.
Are you a vampire pilot? That might work
Better yet, become a billionaire flight surgeon air pirate. You can skip the whole soulless undead bag of grief. You may get a girl as a vampire but you can’t take her on a sunny tropical holiday anywhere. Truth is, being undead stinks after a while.
it's about pirate/seaman yo, so it's quite relative to you
I’m sorry y’all but that was funny as hell🤣🤣🤣 I think I felt every emotion reading those comments 🤣🤣
I find many pilots to be appealing. 🙂
I always get pilots and werewolves mixed up lol
It’s a problem.
Lol. Thinking that too.
They're both pretty much the same
@@agingerbeard fair enough, just don't fly no plane.
This comment has me dying 😂😂
6:27 That reminds me a lot of the following quote.
"Social Media made y'all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it."
─ Mike Tyson
Yezzir.
I think that's why so many people choose the path of ultimate violence when they feel disrespected, in person. No one is capable of just fighting something out in a respectful manner, to move past the issue. Nowadays, if anybody disagrees with anybody, people jump to shooting each other or running each other over with cars, for what is really no good reason.
I think having the ability to disrespect people without any threat of real consequence has made people into confused, oversensitive, over-reactive wussies.
True.
A warrior in the garden, not a gardener in a war.
Yezzir.
true that
I took that as the garden of the mind, but whatever you meant I believe in the destination that unites us
Much love
They want strong, powerful men who have a lot of resources and are good, but not safe. Kind and vulnerable only to them at select moments, and extremely savage to their enemies. A lion, basically.
By powerful do you mean iq or wisdom or that tall and muscular. Does power to them means psychological power of physical power
You see women with all beta men though
@JimmyHeight It’s because betas pretend to be tough and normal dudes can smell it frok a mile away but women literally have no clue what they went for. They fall for sweet talking and theatrics all the time. It’s pretty sad. Iv lost women due to this because I have integrity but integrity isn’t something women even seem to consider, I could sweet talk you and pretend it’s a fairytale or I could just show you. Thing is most don’t have the patience to see they think they have it figured out and end up with fake narcissists
@@JimmyHeightEasy to control...
@@JimmyHeight Only the social media ones that have to post everything on Instagram. Constantly posting how well your life is going on social media is a huge red flag.
Women with strong men are strong themselves, neither side feel the need to advertise or post about their lives.
So the only ones you notice are the unhappy loud ones that are unstable.
When women ask where have all the good men gone, well all the good women took them and visa versa.
Women don’t want us pilots. The risk of aids is too high.
Aviation Induced Divorce Syndrome
I remember Dustin Hoffman saying that before he became a well-known movie star, he couldn't touch a woman with a ten foot stick, but after becoming famous he couldn't beat them off with the same stick. Also, Henry Kissinger made a statement that POWER was the ultimate aphrodisiac. Just a comment, nothing more.
Trump was more descriptive of it lol
I owned a supercar for a few years. Many more women would definitely give out the signals when they saw it was my car. I found it repulsive actually.
Bunch of losers on this thread . I'm outta here.
Lmao the thumbnail pleases me.
It would be nice to also tag the guests in the same way, so it is easier to find all clips and also the full conversation. Thanks for your content!
#DrDelroyPaulhus #DelroyPaulhus #DrPaulhus
Perhaps this is why some women end up with abusive men. They think they can tame him.
Exactly. Women - date a disturbed man at your peril. It's not worth it, walk away. You might waste decades of your life to him.
It is indeed a tremendous challenge, managing that balance. Seemingly impossible at times. So, a question I've pondered: if you're going to "err" then which side should you err on? And I think it's the aggressive side. Being too aggressive can be forgiven, but being too empathic can quickly lead to a loss of respect, and then the relationship is essentially over.
As an agreeable person, I can't agree more on this.
@@HarishKumar-ji6hq Are you male or female? High degrees of agreeableness is a female trait
I'm a male and actually very disagreeable and competitive, creative and rebellious. Became agreeable to my love, later found out that the thing she needs is my true disagreeable side, not this well-crafted-yes-man. It's a responsibility. Working.
The question is "how aggressive does one get? How does one channel their aggression?" Untamed aggression can lead to abusive relationships.
Excellent
Sachin, Shehwag, Rahul Dravid
I think there’s something more complex going on here. It does make sense to me that women are looking for the aggression that is under control. But these ’types’ may have something to do with the initial approach of men to an attractive woman. JP explained it elsewhere as the guy only sees his projection of an ideal woman, not her at all. Most women, to some extent, get beyond this. But in all women, I think there is a desire to arrest a man’s attention. That’s why men who are successful are attractive; they have other things to do and leave us alone for awhile. Maybe I’m the minority in this respect.
When I dated, the respective guy never let me breath enough to even decide if I liked him. Instead he was always calling, showing up at my work, sending flowers, whatever it may be worshiping the ideal…each one was different but the outcome was the same - I got bored. Not his fault - he was chasing that ideal, but to me it seemed disingenuous - I didn’t realize what was happening the way JP explained it, which is too bad for me! So as a result, I never engaged and he ended up friend zoned. (This is why I finally realized I did much better with proximity relationships. I could get to know him at a distance, over time, no pressure.) The man brings flowers to an ideal, not to me. He calls to talk to the ideal, not me. He didn’t even see me. I really liked some of them but couldn’t get past the behavior of constant pursuit.
Go howl at the moon, go hang in your cave at noon and terrorize the town at midnight, go canon bomb the ghost ship matey, and somewhere, somehow, as you’re passing by, make your way through all that danger and throw me a wink and a drenched, half crushed rose from your pirate coat pocket - cause the kracken nearly took you under! - but you rallied and saved the day. Then vanish into the smoke. That will make us want to know more! And want more of him the next time he shows up. Meh, idk, but there’s more to it than just what was mentioned.
@@derrick2181 Nothing wrong with that approach, if it’s working for you and your partner, that’s great. Keep in mind too that I’m responding to Peterson’s ‘5 types’ discussion and trying to understand why each type is what women are choosing to read about. I’m also attempting to lay out the scenario for initiation of relationship as being a valid reason rather than mere aggression or narcissistic traits of the types. I’m not necessarily laying out a pattern for the established, committed relationship like the one you are in. Though I have to admit, the more busy my partner is, staying focused and pursuing his dreams and goals, the happier I am.
Being partnered with someone who isn’t going to let me sway him off his purpose is highly desirable. I’m also intj personality type which sucks as a woman, but I think I’m right about this. It’s not about being rigid and unwilling to negotiate or change. Purpose and change go hand in hand - sometimes to better attain the purpose, one must be willing to change. A man can change and negotiate and still retain his seat of authority - it grants him greater power to do so actually.
And hey! After all the working, if my partner spends a day with me doing nothing but chilling in the park, squishing our toes between the blades of grass, watching the kites flying overhead - that would be a good day. Bonding is important! But tomorrow, leave me alone and go do your thing out there in the wild wild West that men do.
I’m no expert, these are just patterns of behavior I’ve learned in various ways throughout the years.. No judgement on anyone’s personal choices. Sounds like things are working out for you, and that’s really great:)
@@ashleygatewood What you are saying is how all (most) women work.
And its 100% understandable.
YOU want to be the one who seek to cuddle, seek attention and ultimately get his validation.
That is how it works in my relationship. Im very much focused on my "career", advancement and also pursuing my hobbies (working out etc).
Then I let my girl come to me, whenever she wants.
Sometimes she dont want, because women want alone time too, but they dont want alone time being stressed about the man not being happy because "they dont give him attention" - they want to be able to have alone time and yet still knowing the man dont really give a damn because he is too focused on other stuff - that makes them relaxed in the relationship and then within a day or four they will come back wanting to cuddle again, and the man is there, as usual, doing his stuff, and might now give some attention to his woman - and when she wanna go away do other shit again, he is completely fine with that, as he got important shit to do anyway.
That is ultimately how it works and that is how u get a good stress free relationship that basically lasts forever, as the man dont complain, dont whine, dont create drama about bullshit, he just "exists" doing his stuff - and the women can come along for a ride, with the feeling she can stop at any point and he literally wont bother about it - this is what keeps attracting her back to him.
The very moment she feels that he NEEDS HER to be happy, that is the moment she will get a "ughhhhh" - feeling. She cant help it, it just happends.
Tell me your thoughts, Im 99% certain this is the correct approach as my relationship became VERY GOOD once I started acting like this.
So men, just focus on your "purpose" - dont feel too attached to the woman, that is LITERALLY how makes her 100% attached and loyal to you.
@@sundvallen Yes! You explain it well, the man needs to stay on his purpose and that’s attractive to women. It’s not because he is aggressive. I realize men are aggressive with each other and he is the protector of the family. But mixing the 5 types that women read about in romantic novels with aggression and narcissism seems odd. When a man stays on his purpose it put us, as females, at ease, you’re exactly right. It also makes us wonder about him when he isn’t around. If he is always there, always calling, putting us as the center of his life, then we eventually realize something is wrong. We want our partner to need us. But don’t act needy, lol, we are complicated creatures:) Of course we want you to desire to be with us, but if you give us space, we will come to you and that is, I believe as you stated, a good balance between masculine and feminine energy. When it’s switched, it becomes cumbersome. If a man stays on his purpose, and then we ‘tame’ him (i.e. arrest his attention, get him to put us above everything else for a moment, spend time with us, etc) then it’s more rewarding for us because we know he has plenty of other things he COULD be doing. It makes the time spent with him special. It changes slightly when marriage is introduced, but not much.
I can’t understand why Peterson thinks aggression is what women are looking for and attracted to. Maybe I am not understanding him, he’s probably five miles above me. Haha, I’m no expert. So yes, I might be missing what he is saying. But it isn’t ONLY the aggression of these types. A man definitely doesn’t have to be angry or full of fury - that’s not it at all. He can be steady and a gentleman and never angry - but stay on your purpose and stay dominant. Stay in the seat of authority. Perhaps this edge rests with the man, stay away from anger but remain dominant. I see nothing contradictory about being a gentleman and remaining dominant. But I’m not a man so I may have it wrong. Of course men get aggressive in business, in sports and amongst themselves, have at it! I think that’s a plus because it’s built into a man. But it’s way more than that when it comes to attracting women. You’ve explained it very well.
@@ashleygatewooda beta-female like yourself likes a beta-male who doesn't pursue (or protect) his desire.. It doesn't even cross his mind that while he's wallowing in egoic pursuits his woman might be lonely or worse in a dangerous situation.
When is there going to be a conversation about what men look for in women?
Yes people need to have self confidence to be attractive, and yes it's important to a woman that you are handsome, yes we are also visual 😉
Nah I like those who are confident enough not to hide their insecurities. Nothing more beta than a man who wears a mask.
If people were aware that false statements about another person resulting in harm to that person constitute defamation when disseminated online, things would maybe be different. Section 230 only protects the internet service provider from liability, not the individual who uses the platform to disseminate his or her views to my knowledge. State defamation laws should apply in the same way as they apply to otherwise written and spoken false statements resulting in damages.
If I were a man, I’d be asking myself these questions: 1. What type of women are reading these books? 2. Would I even want to attract them? 3. What’s their average intelligence (I think men don’t care about this. But if I were me, and a man, I would care. 4. Could these shallow stereotypes only be around to counter the fact that most of these women probably have husbands who are more like brothers than passionate lovers? Or worse, another child to take care of.
One statistic says 84% of romance novel readers are women - that's not 84% of women in the population! Who's reading and how many are reading?
There’s just so much more to all of this than these shallow, myopic categories. And I’m not so sure we’re rightly discerning aggression from passion from wrath (which by the way is a major deadly sin that will devour not only the rager, but all those around him/her). It will also leave one on top of a hill fighting with God...just ask Jonah.
Anger is unstable. This is why I don’t completely buy into the integrating shadow thing. If you haven’t carefully discerned what it is your integrating, you could end up with a demonic ‘friend’ that has a bad attitude trespassing inside your own abode. That is NOT what women want. Volatility in men is completely undesirable.
Jordan Peterson is asking men to not be a pushover. There is *strength* in standing up for yourself calmly when boundaries are crossed, instead of bending backwards i.e. weak
@@Destinyzx "strength in standing up for yourself calmly" yes, this is what women look for, the ability to stand up for himself without having to use anger to get his way. Anger denotes weakness when it comes to arguing with a significant other. Passionate conversation, excitedness, etc is different from the anger I'm referring to. You can be angry and also not let it over take you. Aggressive anger can be used out there in the world carefully, but I don’t think it should be used against a significant other. Scaring and intimidating her isn’t the answer. (Respect given to him also plays into this, I’ll get to it in a minute…)
I recently watched a documentary about a man who was so weak that he allowed his wife to bring him 10 days from death because he would not stand up to her abuse. I was horrified at how she treated him but also, he played into it 100% and that too was horrifying. It started with her demanding he change his hairstyle and the way he dressed while they were dating. He complied. Fifteen years later, after submitting himself to her (this was the man allowing the woman to usurp his seat of authority by the way), she was pouring boiling water on him and stabbing him while he slept, refusing to feed him (she was starving him), ugh…it was awful, people can be monsters.
Most men obviously won’t allow this, it’s an extreme case but the sooner he draws the line, and honestly how he draws it, is important. Nothing wrong with changing hairstyles really, but I will say this, ultimately, women do not like ‘approval-seeking’ behavior. He still must be his own man within the bonded relationship. I noticed the other day in a Tom Cruise movie, Oblivion, that every time his wife told him not to do something, he did it anyway - the valiant hero archetype in spades. Of course, sometimes she’s right and he should listen - it’s tricky.
Respect. This is where men can get dissatisfied or even disheartened in a relationship when he is not receiving respect, admiration and honor from the woman he loves. This breeds anger. Then he skirts his seat of authority and seeks out approval and respect from her which she translates as weakness and more than likely she disdains the behavior. In this case, it is the wife who is dropping the ball and straining the bond between them. He’ll most certainly find someone else, at some point, who will actively show respect (because a man interprets respect as love). And there’s no reason a wife or significant other should actively withhold this from her husband - it’s cruel - it’s the same as a man actively withholding love from his wife.
Want a man to fall out of love with you? Withhold respect.
Want a man to be great? Show him honor and respect.
And show it not just when he’s right but also and most importantly when he got something wrong. This is the act of loving him as a wife. This should also, I believe, calm any unwarranted aggression, aggravation or anger on his part.
Excellent wardrobe today, Dr. Jordan.
There is an upside to internet trolling. Sometimes the right people get trolled for good reason.
What about all the other traits mentioned by the guy he had on the podcast who wrote a book about this? how do all these traits rank in a hirarchy?
I just smiled with Jordan listed the top 5.
But I don’t want to be a pirate
No worries. Jack Sparrow isn’t my type. 😉
Being destructive to happy people online isn't just a sport or a hobby now, it's acceptable
Pescador de Hombres, thanks so much. Jean Grey loves Scott, but she does like to flirt, with Logan. Spider-Man loves Mary-Jane, but he likes Black Cat. And Batman...well, I kinda feel sorry for him, because that Thalia is insane, and it just never works out with Catwoman. I guess he prefers being alone. Easier to fight crime, which he loves. Great podcast. Gracias!
I'd say it doesn't work with batman because while Spiderman's love life was a drama of love vs duty that took about twenty five years of storytelling to resolve (for the long as Marvel begrudgingly permitted) Batman's love interest of Talia and Catwomen represent the values of justice and mercy to align with either is an imbalance either by embracing greater severity in his methods or being overly lenient to crime. Even with Superman Lois as a journalist embodies his values of the pursuit of truth, justice and (before the 21st century) the american way.
Pytanie. Jakieś postępy w leczeniu hipnozą?
Tall, sexy, funny, confident men that's what I like lol
Perfect men don’t exist
I’m still laughing at the pirate theory!
@@ttalkman maybe she is too?
I took an aptitude test once that said my ideal job would be a nun or a swashbuckler. Are those even jobs? For a woman? I must've answered something wrong
Are you sure you don't like pilots? I'm sorry, I meant to say werewolves.
The parallels (with this discussion) with the spiritual world are perfectly aligned. The bottom line? Clinical psychology attempts to rationalize the spiritual nature of man to explain it away and treat man as a mere beast.
Interesting point of view.
My husband!
Yep! Vampire! My favorite was on the list.
He pronounces psychopathy really strangely.
Canadian.
He’s Canadian so he pronounces everything so peculiarly.
Mess with what they think is truth or sometimes trolls are right people say Jordan is a troll
Female sexual literature, for pirate, surgeon, billionare, vampire, werewolves.. Woman has to pick the man who has capacity to have aggression and enough aggression for protect himself and others and move out in the world against opposition.. Who has consciouss to be caring and sharing. You have to have bit of the moster in the man to keep real monsters away but you don't need to have too much monsters that relationship is not possible. Some men are too aggressive. Some men are too agreeable but they can't put forth themselves and stand up for themselves.
How is it possible that Delroy looks like the exact amalgamation of a pirate, surgeon, billionaire, vampire and a werewolf
So basically women aren’t attracted to gamers?
To keep their babies safe and help them be successful.
Hence so many beautiful young women marrying very wealthy decrepit old men.
Money is security. That's what money means to most women. To men, it seems to mean power, but to women, it's security. That's the bottom line. Sure, they can have pretty things, too, but security is the thing that's genetically encoded. Once you understand that, a lot of other things will make sense.
Marry wealthy man and there risk of husband showing very little care it just work work work work.
Women want to feel safe. Evidence shows in the past at least, that fat men were considered desirable by women. Because in her mind if he can afford to be that big, then she and her children won't starve. So we're looking for a provider who will let us feel safe and secure enough that we can relax and actually be women, having children and raising them.
Before I watch this I’m gonna guess he doesn’t say
“ women like men with integrity , resilience, honesty, holds her accountable, Kind and patient , even with others , wise, stoic and intelligent , a thinker , responsible “
It’s more like
“Women like fantasy characters they made up in their heads and superimpose it on a guy they like and hope it’s true “
A question to both of you: “Game Theory” can assist in answering the sadism-trolling on line.
10:00 I'll play devil's advocate here; isn't "messing with happy people" more a measure of immaturity and or boredom than sadism? If people ignore, rather than "feed the trolls" they move on, like school bullies.
immaturity might be symptomatically simlar to sadism since causing pain to others gets their attention. immaturity wants attention, thus they look similar. perhaps?
You may enjoy going on PubMed (and looking at various places online) and finding Dr. Paulhus's full length papers, or even just the abstracts. That's an excellent point that you raise. Perhaps sadistic and subclinically sadistic people do happen to be immature oftentimes.
I mean, what's the difference between aggressive trolling and people who go to certain areas of the internet to debate people? Or people who make prank videos and make money from it on TH-cam? Or people who die on purpose in video games? I think the word "trolling" is way too vague.
Debating is used with facts and evidence. Trolling doesn't always use facts and logic. It's not made with the goal of advancing a logical point, but done to inflict misery for its own sake. I think you would enjoy finding Dr. Paulhus's full length papers or even just the abstracts online, particularly his paper called "Trolls Just Want to Have Fun."
@@proudatheist2042 You've obviously never debated online if you think it's about facts and logic...
@@BadMannerKorea you're absolutely wrong. My previous TH-cam account, which was my real life name, was revoked because I debated different people about the wild contradictions of the gender blender ideology. I have debated people on a variety of topics on social media. Some people abide by facts in debates, and some don't, like theists and SJW wokies.
@@proudatheist2042 So then you’d know full well that online debates, in many cases, are far from facts and evidence.
If women don't like me then I'll just be content with myself and keep all my peace and money for myself.
My thoughts exactly. But an issue we face is that we can live to 80-100. That’s another 60 years, that’s a LONG time to be alone. We may be happy now but in 40 years when all our friends have family’s and kids and we are alone I’m sure we will regret the choice of staying alone. Everyone I have spoke to who has kids has said it is 100% worth it and it’s the most fulfilling thing in life. Having kids and a relationship is a big deal and we can’t just brush it off. Over the years I’ve decided that it is what I need to do in life. We need a family, healthy relationships and to look forward to the future. Besides, more responsibility is probably a good thing.
@@nightkingxx Yes if the relationship fails. It’s a risk you have to take if you want to play the game.
@@nightkingxx MGTOW isn’t the best long term solution to your distrust in women/risk tolerance
As much as I respect Jordan Peterson, it always uses me to hear a man talk about what women want. Why don’t they ask a woman?
I love you, Dr. Peterson, but you lost me when you started talking about online anonymity. As someone who used to use an anonymous forum, these things have their place in society, particularly when there could be serious social or legal repercussions for expressing certain ideas. If anything, the US Constitution effectively canonized the concept when it established freedom of the press, with the understanding that anonymous journalists/publishers/anyone with a pen and paper/radio broadcaster should not be penalized for expressing that which they thought to be true.
I do not say this lightly, as I have witnessed firsthand the kind of irreverent sadism prolonged exposure in such anonymous environments can cultivate. But my time in such forums was also a learning experience, and a much-needed trial by fire that grew me and countless others a thicker skin. The free flow of ideas in such forums likewise led to exposing quite a few ideas to serious scrutiny that would have been unheard of before. Modern meme culture is itself an outgrowth of 4chan, which in its prime was simultaneously the Wild West and sewer of the Internet, all built upon anonymous posting with minimal moderation.
Likewise, "trolling" is an ambiguous term that can mean a lot of things to a lot of people. And yes, anonymous boards like 4chan and SomethingAwful used to be very open about promoting such bullying (as evidenced by the latter's "Helldump" board, whose denizens regularly found people and _bullied them to suicide for their own amusement)._ Unfortunately, that old definition has drifted considerably, particularly as website moderation has been tightened (and abused) across the board. The dreaded "trolls" of the 2000s and early 2010s are mostly extinct, though the most genuinely toxic have graduated to *_being the most vocal advocates of cancel culture._* This has been best evidenced by assorted "bully hunters" and the Twitter "Trust and Safety Council," wherein the psychopaths most responsible for the problem in the first place are unwittingly given control of the mechanisms ostensibly designed to keep themselves in check. In practice, those crying the loudest about harassment online tend to be those engaging in it themselves, often reframing criticism or even discussion of their own hypocritical behavior as "harassment." This means that more often than not, cries of harassment are disingenuous, often designed as a rallying cry for defense aimed at the gullible, the ideologically aligned, and other bad actors running rampant. Worse, the more successful of these crybullies tend to have institutional power or connections to those who do, leading to academic or media narratives framed in the favor of the false victim and while slandering their real targets (e.g. everything related to GamerGate). "Solidarity" is others in on the grift working together to protect their shared racket. And over the last decade, this has led to spiraling moderation and censorship on every site at every level of discourse. The term "troll" has become the modern equivalent of accusing someone of witchcraft, _with all the dehumanization that implies._ Even if "troll" isn't used to paint a target on the speaker's back for opposing someone's agenda, it still all too often used to justify disregarding what they have to say, no matter how truthful, substantive, or nuanced; "ignore him, he's just a troll."
Whether we like it or not, anonymity is one of the edges of the double-edged sword of free speech, and there is much to be gained by diving into the chaos of anonymity and returning to tell the tale. Better to learn how to deal with it head-on than sacrifice fundamental liberties in the name of fighting it.
So, our desire to kill somebody should be equally matched with our desire to eat them..and we gotta do this knowing we are what we eat?
…but, I don’t wanna be a pirate!
Czy przypadkiem oni nie zostali pozbawieni wszystkiego ?
Tak.
Yes. Psychopaths cannot live in a community.
Psychopaths do live amongst us in our communities. Dr. Peterson has mentioned how psychopathy is passed through the generations.
@@proudatheist2042 I should have said small community.
Mr p no way
Pilots 😆😅 oh yeah? Ohhh no lol was so close lol 😆
You lost me at "commanding". I personally prefer self-confident, but respectful, intelligent, caring guys. An equal. Men who want to take control reek of insecurity.
Not all women are into the Twilight archetype, Jordan. Many are... And I honestly can't understand why😂.
But there are men that seek controlling, dangerous women who try to dominate regular guys too. Take the opera Habanera. Not so common... But the femme fatale is a thing too.
Ambassador_144_Empathy_uprising The top Gs are back Pete sapper Devin Carmen And Cameron Ziomek we just need Our elder now 🫡😁 Viva La Vida Long live thy king
Tall, handsome, able, and a whopping noodle
Women want to be in a harem so long as they feel special, interesting.
Women look for a man that gives them hope. Back in the day there was hope.
My grandfather was quite frankly an ignorant coal miner. Couldn't even write properly. He had a wife and 2 kids and even managed to send them to school and buy a house
Smart. I like them smart so it's slim pickins for me. Smart men still want a model. Just because they're good doesn't mean they're still not men.
whats jordans take on looks then? on top of that robert pattinson was edward not some ugly fat short dude, but his theory would say there would no difference.
According to your own story from previous years, it's pirate, not pilots! :)
Starting at 31:35 th-cam.com/video/_UL-SdOhwek/w-d-xo.html
This is a real gem, btw!
vampire kkkkkk
Who was on that “women” panel? Sounds like a group of ninth grade girls? Never ever did I want that type of man 🤣 maybe there are different subtypes in the age groups,…? Everyone knows a surgeon is usually narcissistic and don’t get me started on the pirates, they never want to even go dutch !
not true at all.
Jordan, leave women alone and focus on your own marriage. We know what we want.
He is just stating facts and how things happen. You chose to get ultra offended just because he states facts. Too many women seem to desire men that do not exist in real life.
The way you beat these sadistic parasites can be found in the scripture of the west and in nature. You have to be bait and the predator of the parasites. Like an angler fish. You have to be Gilgamesh and Tiamat. 😊
Chad
Hahaha 🤣 No, just no. Naughty professor. Most women like men to write or read them Poetry, show lovingkindness, respect, intelligence, humbleness and confident not arrogant. Strong but not abusive, honesty and manly. Thank you Jordan for another interesting conversation. God bless ✝️❤️
Agree
No you like poetry, but not when men write poetry to you.
If so, please provide worldwide statistical evidence to back that up.
Jordan has provided his. Where’s yours?
@@deanmccrorie3461 I like poetry and find it very romantic, when a man I'm seeing does that for me
I think what you’re referring to is also what the Dr. is ultimately talking about as well. It’s just that he’s also characterizing the men you’re referring to as not just generous/kind but also somebody who has the capacity for aggression and competence.
“Women have to pick a man who has the capacity…enough of the capacity for aggression to protect themselves and others and to move out into the world against a fair bit of opposition but whose also simultaneously emphatic or perhaps conscientious enough to be caring and sharing.”
In other words, it’s competence driven generosity.
The Dr. refers to a book called “A Billion Wicked Thoughts” and how it was found that the characters in harlequin romances that are identified mostly in female pornographic searches illustrate the point he’s trying to make where the man is usually a billionaire, pirate, vampire, surgeon, or werewolf.
I think we all agree with what you said. Generally speaking women want men in the way you characterized them, but Dr. Peterson says that’s also the desirable ending of these harlequin romance stories with these characters: for the innocent, well meaning, virgin female protagonist to tame the male monster (in whatever aforementioned permutation they embody) into someone who can engage in a prosperous romantic relationship with them. She would desire all the things you listed, but would prefer if they came from a ‘tamed monster’ who is also widely competent and channels aggression into something positive.
At least, that’s my understanding of what I’ve seen from Dr. Peterson on this topic.
@@deanmccrorie3461 I gave my opinion as a WOMAN. I don’t need to prove myself to you. Lol FYI Men have written poetry to me and especially for me about me. Have a wonderful and blessed day.
thumbnail --> trump
they look for men with YUGE hands...
Lost me at staying ahead of the parasites.
W gardle Trumpa chłopakowi stanęłam.
A to początek końca dla czarnej szlachty
I markiza Trompow.
He wouldn't know take a look at his daughter that's a man
Absolute nonsense.
I used to read romance novels. At some point I realized that they were ALL THE SAME and took them all to the used book store and started collecting classic literature after that. Romance novels are porn in their own way, and complete garbage.
cash-arrogance-dancing-ability-and-overall-douchebaggery;harry-styles
Harry Styles can, in my opinion, get away with what he does because he is attractive and wealthy.
@@proudatheist2042 not-attractive;i-would-NOT-want-to-look-like-that-f**
Ha ha ironic a man telling women what women prefer in a man
😂😂 why is trump on the thumbnail?
Haha! Ikr??
I think it’s because he’s a good example of what they’re talking about. He’s wealthy, aggressive (just listen to his speeches), and confident.
@@AndySaenz No I see it, but they could have used 007 so I just thought it was funny:) Yes, Trump is commanding and dominates even with his humor (Rocket Man has got to be my all time fav) and he's courageous. I mean, they didn't feature Bezos or Zuck....they're billionaires, lol!
With Trumps in the picture it’s such a turn off I will not watch
Stop giving air time to these criminals Jordan
Can't be the fantastic 4 without 4 🙏🤍♥️🤎
The Dark Tetrad?