💲 Join the Cash Made Simple Community: the best place for you to improve your game and achieve your goals as a cash game player. I study, you play. We Win. Secure your spot by November 21st. Get started: bit.ly/cmscyoutube
Great video!! the one slide you have on the massive river over bluff X-X-B line, how do you accumulate or pull those stats that B280 is 0.3 = 24 weak? Thank you! I’m so excited and ready to put in the work.
So would a correct exploit in the IP vs OOP (Fish in BB, we sit in button for example) be: We check Range back on Flop because of their overprobing gameplay, we call range on turn for any size below overbet, we bluff any air/possible bluff vs rivercheck for any sizing (lets use B60) and we just call down any bluffcatcher vs their turn and river bet line as long as they use less than overbet
It seems like that is one way to win vs fish - maybe not the max ev strategy, but still winning. The main point of the entire presentation however is to study, or pay someone to study, with node locking to find the max ev strategies vs your player pool.
@@lorenamarioamendes Yea he didn't, I just felt like it would improve the outcome for us. Maybe just check any pairred hand to use their overstab as freemoney as saolo described and also bet any unpaired hand to get the foldequity/equity realisation (they don't raise flops enough)
Checking flop more would be part of a max exploit strategy, as long as there were no other equally profitable exploits in the betting line. At the end of the day fish will leak regardless of what you do on the flop, so both checking more or betting more are good approaches. The only way to know which is best is modeling all their behaviour in subsequent lines. I played a long time with high cbet frequency vs them, nowadays I like checking flop a bit more
@@saulocostapoker As far as I know from other creators, fish still overbluff a lot in a line where we cbet IP, turn goes checkcheck and they bet river for any size below overbet so both checking and betting flop is profitable, as long as we don't fold bluffcatchers easily !
It sounds like only a tiny number of people are straight up winning on GG over long samples, before rakeback, and not very many on Stars. Is this correct?
Of course not :D I just filtered for the highest winning players, from an already filtered list of who had played at least 100 thousand hands. If I loosen the filter to 10k hands, there are 476 regs that made money gyazo.com/834f2c18647139e74f76a3640fb71ac1
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [1/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLGjxFL6U_I/mqdefault.jpg)
💲 Join the Cash Made Simple Community: the best place for you to improve your game and achieve your goals as a cash game player.
I study, you play. We Win. Secure your spot by November 21st. Get started: bit.ly/cmscyoutube
Great video!! the one slide you have on the massive river over bluff X-X-B line, how do you accumulate or pull those stats that B280 is 0.3 = 24 weak? Thank you! I’m so excited and ready to put in the work.
Hey man, that print comes from H2N, it calculates everything for us. You just put the hands in the program and it does the calculations
@saulocostapoker Thank you! I’ll definitely be getting it (I currently have PT4 but this sounds better.
So would a correct exploit in the IP vs OOP (Fish in BB, we sit in button for example) be: We check Range back on Flop because of their overprobing gameplay, we call range on turn for any size below overbet, we bluff any air/possible bluff vs rivercheck for any sizing (lets use B60) and we just call down any bluffcatcher vs their turn and river bet line as long as they use less than overbet
It seems like that is one way to win vs fish - maybe not the max ev strategy, but still winning. The main point of the entire presentation however is to study, or pay someone to study, with node locking to find the max ev strategies vs your player pool.
No I don't think he said to check range flop. It was IF we check flop, then if villain probes etc.
@@lorenamarioamendes Yea he didn't, I just felt like it would improve the outcome for us. Maybe just check any pairred hand to use their overstab as freemoney as saolo described and also bet any unpaired hand to get the foldequity/equity realisation (they don't raise flops enough)
Checking flop more would be part of a max exploit strategy, as long as there were no other equally profitable exploits in the betting line. At the end of the day fish will leak regardless of what you do on the flop, so both checking more or betting more are good approaches. The only way to know which is best is modeling all their behaviour in subsequent lines. I played a long time with high cbet frequency vs them, nowadays I like checking flop a bit more
@@saulocostapoker As far as I know from other creators, fish still overbluff a lot in a line where we cbet IP, turn goes checkcheck and they bet river for any size below overbet so both checking and betting flop is profitable, as long as we don't fold bluffcatchers easily !
It sounds like only a tiny number of people are straight up winning on GG over long samples, before rakeback, and not very many on Stars. Is this correct?
Sick Damm Stream!
Thank you!
You broke new ground Saulo!
Anyone else sit through the intro vibing out to the beats like “Oh lawd Jetson made another one”?
No.
@@fishbonegaga ahh damn, you missed out then
@@xGETxREKTx 😃😉
A worldwide site, tens of thousands of players, , with 15 winning players at 100NL? So, the answer is don't play.
Of course not :D I just filtered for the highest winning players, from an already filtered list of who had played at least 100 thousand hands. If I loosen the filter to 10k hands, there are 476 regs that made money gyazo.com/834f2c18647139e74f76a3640fb71ac1
1 hour 27 minutes to 1 hour 29 minutes 😂😎💪🏻 fuckin beast 👊🏻
Too much advertisement for my taste, I am sorry.
No need to be sorry. I know I can't please everyone