ppl like bailey go after police because their client is clearly guilty. bailey even as a young man wouldnt last a day as a cop. lawers love to dissect essential workers decisions in the field but i get it, they have to in order to get their rapists and murderers off. he was so ridiculous and condescending up there Rossi shouldve said dont call me if you need police assistance u pompous ass
Witness: "Say again. Bear with me sir, I been working since 10 o'clock last night." Attorney Lee Bailey: "I understand, so have I waiting for you so were even. Now...."😭😂😂😂 I love F. Lee
what surprises me is that these lapd witnesses are still made to work what is a difficult job all night and then show up to court to get put on trial by OJ's million dollar lawyers? ridiculous on the part of the lapd
F. Lee Bailey is maybe the greatest litigation lawyer to ever be in a trial court room. He is fantastic and should to this day be used in training for trial lawyers on how to twist any witness no matter their rank station or duty’s. This man could take on the highest ranking officer and make him out to be a private in a matter of minutes. Rest In Peace legend.
His voice stays with you.after cross examining me i would definitely check into a hotel drink a lot of whiskey and smoke a couple kilos while grunting about the next day.
Stephen Sipek....my adrenaline is overflowing....I have severak books written by investigative journalist. One of whom is Joseph Bosco who was there every single day ( Book: A Problem of Evidence: How The Prosecution Set Simpson Free)...I need to pull away for awhile
@@keithy4129 So is his coughing into the mic 🤢🤮 He _should_ really turn his head, put his hand in front of his mouth, and _then_ proceed to cough up a lung.
Vee Sea I agree. I feel like I need to clear my throat when he speaks. He is so wonderful, he was disbarred and spent six weeks in prison for contempt. Fitting, no? Lol.
I was once interrogated by my dad about a cigar he found in the bath. he did not stop until I confessed I smoked it. even now I have nightmares about it
You can say that again. I think this is about the time it became clear that the Los Angeles police department was desperately in need of evolution..... scrutiny accountability professionalism possibly less racism and more transparency. Yeah. Looks like this was an indication... .
"do you know how rocket propulsion system works?" "no sir, i don't need to know that" "does popeye outrank captain america?" "exsuse me?" "you really have no competence to be a police officer, do you?"
30:28 Right there and then, and the questions leading up to it, and the succeeding ones were a direct example of Irving's Commandments of Cross-Examination (specifically 3. Always ask leading questions; 4. Don't ask a question to which you do not know the answer; 5. Listen to the witness's answers; 9. Don't ask the "one question too many";) I know there are other examples blotted throughout the hour, but this was a shining example to my non-lawyer self.
Poor Marsha, she got stuck with poorly trained police and detectives. If all defendants got F. Lee Bailey services the state would have big problems convicting people.
she did not prep the witnesses properly, I am shocked how incompetent was forensic Fung. if any of my students knew so little about DNA they will fail the class
@@amandaplease3007 not when they make up "facts" or plant evidence and state under oath what "they" have found. Today with body cameras, if it's been turned on the citizen has a chance, they some times turn them off.
It didn`t occur to the sargeant to ask OJ Simpson`s `nine year old daughter for her father`s phone number. He tried to get the alarm company to give him OJ`s telephone number instead. How stupid is this guy ! He seemed to sleep walk through the crime scene.
S.L.S do you know they didn’t ask her if she knew her dad’s number? No. You don’t. Someone at the cop shop maybe did ask, but you cannot interrogate distraught children, so they probably didn’t want to distress them anymore than they already were. The children were upset, tired and scared. “What is your dads number, as we cannot find it” would surely distress them more.
@@pommiebears Asking Sydney "What's your dad's phone number?" is hardly an interrogation and certainly wouldn't make any nine year child distressed. Actually just the opposite, they need it to contact him to make arrangements to take them out of police station.
@BH I hope you continue watching this trial. Watch Bailey's competence in cross examining William Bodziak the FBI shoe print expert. Cochran and Simpson wouldn't let him have any more witnesses after that debacle.
@@terryleddra1973 -There are several cases in which the perpetrators of crimes would change the soles of their shoes to point in the opposite direction.A scientist in Texas murdered his wife ,walked away in the snow with the soles on backwards.
Bailey chomp chomp, wipe mouth. Mic drop. Lordy these cops would rather play dumb than admit they rushed to judgement. They didn’t rush they were zero to 60 when furman got there and u know he said OJ did it
Fuhrman was right wasn't he. Of course they rushed to Simpson. History was really against him with the abuse and everything. The police can not be blamed. They did everything right expect some details. They gathered the most important proof and that should have been enough if it wasn't for the prosecution putting everyone up on the stand for the defense to create reasonable doubt.
@@NeverGiddy -Last time ,the photo of Fhurman pointing at the Bundy glove were taken past 7.30 am after he allegedly found the Rockingham glove.No evidence a glove existed before.
@@philipwilliams1754 - Welcome to the law Philip . . . I thought you knew everything. "In the law, testimony is a form of evidence that is obtained from a witness who makes a solemn statement or declaration of fact" First Riske, then every other police witness who testified after provided the evidence of the existence of the glove at Bundy, starting as early as 12:20 am or so. Evidence Philip. You don't know what evidence is, do you? And remember from your other post, Riske doesn't lie. His testimony is evidence. ~
Next of kin of the children are?? OJ Simpson. The children were at a police station, and they needed picking up, and they needed their daddy before the news of their mothers murder was told to them.
Bailey's interrogation of the police is incredible, my the police officer is so arrogant that the cop wore his uniform to the court house. They've been so stupid for so long they think their the law, until there confronted by the law. And the lying or I don't know or I don't understand what you mean by that 🤡🤡🥕
Perhaps you should learn to spell: It's INTERROGATION. And it's spelled LYING, not "lieing". 🙄 And... Learn correct grammar: "THEY ARE" or "THEY'RE" *_not_* "their" and likewise with "there"...again it's "THEY ARE" or "THEY'RE"... *_Before_* *calling others "stupid"...* 🤤
@@kennethcharles1386 Yyyyeah, I'm not American. So please don't assume ONLY Americans watch TH-cam. And in my country we actually convicted the sports hero who murdered his significant other...so there's that.
@@veesea8889 really sad that you feel that way about life, it's just a matter of celebrating Americas Birthday 🎂 do you have to be Amercian 🇺🇸 to show respect.
the cops did a sloppy job because they did not know who was the victim until Fuhrman arrived. whether it was frame job I am not sure, but for certain were incompetents.
@@IanP1963 I think that they saw some pictures with OJ in the house and they realized that it is his wife. Fuhrman knew for sure that she was his ex wife because he went to the house when she called the cops after he was violent
@@roc7880 Does it really matter if cops know or don't know who the victims are or were, it's the protection of the crime scene and evidence that initially matters ????
@@IanP1963 you are correct. the cops who entered the crime scene said there were not trained in handling evidence and I think is plausible. the LAPD was in a bad shape in the 90s poorly trained and supervised.
@@moniquefrey-jackson3977 Fuhrman plead the fifth when he was asked about his use of the N word, then every question he was asked thereafter. The defence realised this so they asked him specifically about planting the glove
I totally agrre!! It is absolutely RIDICULOUS for lead to detectives to leave the crime scene and go to notify someone of a death...they were full of bs...i feel in my heart and soul Fuhrman planted evidence. OJ may or may not be guilty but those assholes planted evidence!! No doubt!
Yes there is Brian Russell. Under oath he pled the 5th after being asked if he planted evidence in this case. That is all the evidence, and then some that one needs to understand he was a poor and worse yet crooked detective.
B Trimble - If you understand what pleading the 5th means, he has to plead the 5th to everything he's asked. If they'd asked him if he was the second gunman behind the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza he would have pleaded the 5th. Doesn't mean he was the gunman. You have to plead the 5th to everything, you can't be selective. It isn't an admission of guilt to plead the 5th. No evidence was presented he planted any evidence in any case. If he was such a bad cop and planted evidence, why did no one contact the defense on their 1-800 number and tell their story. Cochran would have put them on the stand. Cochran didn't, because no one called, because he'd never framed anyone before this case or during this case. ~
He did not "have to" plead the 5th on everything. That was a choice, to me the burden of proof is gone, reasonable doubt is established and one can assume evidence was at least tampered with, if not planted. He was not required to plead the 5th on every question, that was a choice to cover his lying ass.
F Lee Bailey is a phenomenal cross examiner and defense lawyer. The brutal truth though, is it ethical to do your job as well as he does even though he knows that his client is guilty? I don’t believe so!
A client is guilty only when she/he confesses in court to the judge of having commited the crime OR , via a trial, when a jury convicts the person charged with the crime. Those two are the only legally-accepted, Constitutionally-sanctioned scenarios for a client to be recognised as officially “guilty”. If you have a defense client who pleads not guilty, then you have to work with that, and take her/his word for it, and devise a defense plan that works in the best interest of the client and one that is unassailable as possible. Aren’t we all in this republic protective of the legal principle that a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court of law or when she/he confesses in a court of law? After all, the person you’re defending is your employer as well as your client.
It absolutely is ethical according to the professional rules of ethics. It's unethical not to zealously represent your client to the fullest, end of sentence. The job is to test the government's case. Hold them to the high bar of proving every element of every offense beyond a reasonable doubt... the system works because defense attorneys do that. Even if there is video evidence of your client committing the crime, you have an obligation to defend that client. Bailey is well within the ethical bounds here. Lawyers represent clients every day where there is far more evidence than there was against OJ, believe it or not.
24:45 Bailey argues with him about the location of the walkway that runs along the house, and says both doors are accessible from it. The cop plays dumb and says you can't reach the doors from the walkway. They argue about this for two or three minutes, then the cop stipulates that while you can get to the door from the walkway, you have to walk on a short piece of walkway to get to the door. This has clearly frustrated Bailey. Cop - "I thought you were talking about the walkway on the side of the house" Bailey - "The walkway on the front starting at the gate, runs beside the house, all the way to the walkway in the back, doesn't it sergeant?" Cop - "It also leads off to the front door".... Bailey finally gives up, and says "Let's move on, they went in through the garage at any event.... you never entered the house, you may not even know where the doors ARE, is that fair?" LOL amazing
F Lee Bailey is of course amazing but also it’s so sinister they way they defend him. Idk I agree with the idea that we shouldn’t be able to just throw ppl in jail and the burden of proof falls on the government but you gotta know that those lawyers knew he did it and to watch them poke holes In the prosecutions case it’s hard to watch at times
I've watched this whole trial over the last 2seeks. I Thot this dude did this...but after watching the whole trial I don't think he did this...AFTER ALL THESE YEARS OF THINKNG HE DID....smh
no. if the cops mishandled evidence, which they did, there is enough space for reasonable doubt. which it was. remember it is up to the state to prove guilt not the accused
They really messed up why didn't they prepare the witness before they make them testify,and why when the crime was reported why did they send a rookie he didn't even take notes
@@roc7880 plz had they done there job instead of relying on all they evidence they had,all the witnesses they put on the stand got played by the defense team
The only mistake they made is not foreseeing F Lee Bailey and Johnny Cochran would be handling the case. 99.9% of other attorneys would not have drawn out and highlight the mistakes made.
So basically, Mr. Bailey blurts out what he WISHES happened, not what ACTUALLY happened. When the Judge sustains an objection about that he says "oh, I thought somebody said that…" You can't play the befuddled and confused old man in a court of law Sir... Well, apparently *he can but it shouldn't be allowed. I've witnessed so many gross mind games and manipulations throughout this trial. The defense played this jury like a fiddle; they stupidly fell for every ounce of it...
According to the defense. You should levitate in the air to process a scene. I can't believe the prosecution let them get away with this crap. A certain amount of evidence gets disturbed when processing a scene. Its a fact that you just properly document. Riske's answer to most questions should have veen " not my job"
The reason Rossi looked so much like a fool is because he was lying and F. Lee Bailey ( a seasoned lawyer) could smell a cover up a mile away. There was a stink on this case that OJ's dream team could smell. Rossi was part of the cover up that blew up in the face of the prosecutors.
Pure grasping at straws. I get a kick out of all these comments saying how great Bailey was. Think about this: all of his questions (taken collectively to all witnesses) imply BOTH a frame job AND the LAPD incompetence. How do those 2 things coexist? And doesn't that actually mean there was a legit investigation here? And if that is the case.......doesn't that mean that some of the evidence is legit? And (finally) if it is.......doesn't that mean he is guilty beyond any doubt? If ONE drop of that blood evidence is legit.....he did it (without question). If I was on the jury, I'd consider this an insult to my intelligence.
The frame job was the rogue racist detective planting evidence by himself. Or let's put it this way Furman took one for the team while the other detectives milked the la taxpayers.
Good grief! That was an exhausting INTERROGATION! 😪🥵🤪😵 I'm knackered and can only imagine how Sgt Rossi felt after that, almost...thraping. Hostile and belligerent! I thought lawyers were meant to object to hostility towards and badgering of a witness on the stand 🤯
F Lee Bailey may be a great lawyer, but he had his #1 Fan, Lance Ito for a Judge in this case. That helped Bailey look good here. It seems to me Ito showed a little bit of favoritism the whole Simpson trial.
F. Lee Bailey. . . . . Prime example of when arrogance is mistaken for intelligence. His "skills" are based on being able to question individuals that are required to answer his questions in a courtroom.
criminalist fung photographed and collected the evidence of OJ's blood on and in the bronco and at both crime scenes before OJ even got back to Los Angeles that morning, so they flew on OJ's air plane, took blood from him invisibly while he wasn't even back in Los angeles yet LOL and my cat flies and dances
She has too, it’s her only hope, she got dealt a bad hand by the lackluster lapd. On top of that she is up against top notch lawyers, F.Lee Bailey and Johnnie Cochran being legends.
But it's perfectly ok for Johnnie to do it to her, to not shut up, to interupt or object every 5 minutes during her questioning??? LOL! Alrighty then...
OJ paid his lawyers millions to ensure everyone else was on trial except him. in hindsight he couldve gone cheap and hired a better call saul because the jury was never gonna convict him anyway as several have admitted. revenge for rodney king
Lol imagine that? One of the prosecution’s most key witnesses to the whole murder investigation invokes his fifth? The case would fall apart quicker than it actually did. 🤣
David Rossi's hair was black before this cross.
This cop thinking “dang, I gotta come back and go through this again in the morning”. Bailey was a beast that held nothing back in this trial.
Absolutely 💯
F Lee Bailey....
Bailey makes me want to turn myself in.
he would make you confess of a crime committed before you were born
ppl like bailey go after police because their client is clearly guilty. bailey even as a young man wouldnt last a day as a cop. lawers love to dissect essential workers decisions in the field but i get it, they have to in order to get their rapists and murderers off. he was so ridiculous and condescending up there Rossi shouldve said dont call me if you need police assistance u pompous ass
Witness: "Say again. Bear with me sir, I been working since 10 o'clock last night."
Attorney Lee Bailey: "I understand, so have I waiting for you so were even. Now...."😭😂😂😂 I love F. Lee
Does anyone but me get the impression that Ito is not too fond of Bailey?
@@hollywilliams8017 /I discern that too!
36:23 onwards. Yeah that was a sweet spot, he let him know.
@@hollywilliams8017 intimidated, yet very respectful of his commanding presence
what surprises me is that these lapd witnesses are still made to work what is a difficult job all night and then show up to court to get put on trial by OJ's million dollar lawyers? ridiculous on the part of the lapd
F. Lee Bailey is maybe the greatest litigation lawyer to ever be in a trial court room. He is fantastic and should to this day be used in training for trial lawyers on how to twist any witness no matter their rank station or duty’s. This man could take on the highest ranking officer and make him out to be a private in a matter of minutes. Rest In Peace legend.
He is okay, but he is no Darrell Brooks!
His voice stays with you.after cross examining me i would definitely check into a hotel drink a lot of whiskey and smoke a couple kilos while grunting about the next day.
He got a cold-blooded killer off. Not to mention many other scumbags who he knew were guilty.
@@ForeverBennett The killers came out of freds world.He is married to the exwife of Marvin Glass,a convicted druglord and murderer.
@@ForeverBennett Furhman planted the wrong size glove.
F Lee Bailey!! 🤣🤣 Savage!!
I love it!
thx again, looking forward to this week's videos.
Marcia was way overmatched by these heavy hitters for the defense.
I 2nd that emotion !
Big facts
The Master. RIP
I 2nd that emotion
Lefty Stevenson....
Bailey and Cochran’s presence alone is intimidating!
Bailey was more suited to Simpson's defense than either Cochran or Shapiro.
True
@@wet-readAll of them played a role. Think of the 1998 Chicago Bulls.
@@jordanking6939
I'm just saying what the facts are. The idea that Simpson had a "Dream Team" of legal counsel is overstated at best.
@@jordanking6939 But Bailey was Jordan.
F Lee Bailey is an absolute JOY to watch. Brilliant!
Stephen Sipek....my adrenaline is overflowing....I have severak books written by investigative journalist. One of whom is Joseph Bosco who was there every single day ( Book: A Problem of Evidence: How The Prosecution Set Simpson Free)...I need to pull away for awhile
I’m not even into law and he is a legend. His skill and his voice is unmatched!
@@keithy4129 So is his coughing into the mic 🤢🤮 He _should_ really turn his head, put his hand in front of his mouth, and _then_ proceed to cough up a lung.
Vee Sea I agree. I feel like I need to clear my throat when he speaks. He is so wonderful, he was disbarred and spent six weeks in prison for contempt. Fitting, no? Lol.
@@veesea8889 --Deal with the evidence.
Chris Darden was bad choice for the case. Legend Mr Bailey and Mr Cochran.....superb...Ms Clark was trapped :)
You’re happy OJ wasn’t punished??
Yeah def way over matched! You can actually see/hear the difference
@@Ristofecthey didn't say anything about that. They were strictly commenting on how overmatched the prosecution was. Relax.
@@Ristofecyou're upset someone found not guilty wasn't punished?
Maybe Darden was a diversity hire.
I would NOT want Bailey being my dad LOL
Isa Cece Just run away at birth.
I was once interrogated by my dad about a cigar he found in the bath. he did not stop until I confessed I smoked it. even now I have nightmares about it
Wait till you meet prosecutor Juan Martinez ( Jodi Arias) you wouldn't want a father.
@@giuseppinafadi4899 Come on Martinez was so annoying and Mr F Lee Bailey is Legend they can't be compared.
@@roc7880 😂🤣😅🤣🤣👏👏👏👏👏👏
A 20+year officer was made to sound and look like a rookie on his second day on the job.. mr Bailey is definitely great at what he does
You can say that again. I think this is about the time it became clear that the Los Angeles police department was desperately in need of evolution..... scrutiny accountability professionalism possibly less racism and more transparency. Yeah. Looks like this was an indication...
.
And all I can think of is wait until Bailey gets to Mark Furhman.
@@531katie mr Bailey definitely has a commanding presence and very well rounded education in different aspects of criminal law
@@531katie -Brilliant.
It’s called manipulation.x
I feel like I'm walking out of the store without buying anything and telling myself to act normal
In hindsight, I so want F. Lee Bailey to ask every white cop "Have you ever used the word Ni@@er?
Love listening to this man 👌🏼
F L Bailey is a genius.
I agree.
@@sofialavish1072 Rest in peace, Bailey
Also shamed, crooked, and dead
I 2nd that emotion.
♡
Dammn this guy baits you.. ropes you in and absolutely destroys you!!!!!!
F Lee. Bailey.....
Simply Brilliant.....
RIP F LEE BAILEY.
I 2nd that emotion..
♡
"do you know how rocket propulsion system works?"
"no sir, i don't need to know that"
"does popeye outrank captain america?"
"exsuse me?"
"you really have no competence to be a police officer, do you?"
Did anyone call the coroner?
Know we waited for 10+ hours.
Your too stupid to be a police officer but you can have your old job back at Coppertone.
30:28
Right there and then, and the questions leading up to it, and the succeeding ones were a direct example of Irving's Commandments of Cross-Examination (specifically 3. Always ask leading questions; 4. Don't ask a question to which you do not know the answer; 5. Listen to the witness's answers; 9. Don't ask the "one question too many";)
I know there are other examples blotted throughout the hour, but this was a shining example to my non-lawyer self.
OJ owed Shapiro a debt he could never pay after hiring this team. Everyone was brilliant. Whoever called them the dream team was right on the money
Mr Bailey excellent lawyer
12:23.. " You're not a expert on melting rates".. Classic Bailey
lol - melting rates! (made me smile), I wouldnt have put it past them to call an expert witness in cream melting rates
@@creativemd275 And if they did....all the sudden they would be in this massive conspiracy/cover up.
@@creativemd275 It was known when the ice cream was purchased. They should have taken a picture of the melted ice cream.
😂
Wow this is one stupid Police Department! Smh. What kind of Law Enforcement are they?
They aresset and Prosercute poor and indegent people.
27:40 Marcia realizes she's being Bailey'd
Riskie was just a cop doing his job.
Poor Marsha, she got stuck with poorly trained police and detectives. If all defendants got F. Lee Bailey services the state would have big problems convicting people.
Lol frfr
@@bp2352 Right you are.
she did not prep the witnesses properly, I am shocked how incompetent was forensic Fung. if any of my students knew so little about DNA they will fail the class
Its easy to defend your client when you know hes innnnnnnnocccccennnnt
@@amandaplease3007 not when they make up "facts" or plant evidence and state under oath what "they" have found. Today with body cameras, if it's been turned on the citizen has a chance, they some times turn them off.
It didn`t occur to the sargeant to ask OJ Simpson`s `nine year old daughter for her father`s phone number. He tried to get the alarm company to give him OJ`s telephone number instead. How stupid is this guy ! He seemed to sleep walk through the crime scene.
Matches Malone-They go up against public defender's.
S.L.S do you know they didn’t ask her if she knew her dad’s number? No. You don’t. Someone at the cop shop maybe did ask, but you cannot interrogate distraught children, so they probably didn’t want to distress them anymore than they already were. The children were upset, tired and scared. “What is your dads number, as we cannot find it” would surely distress them more.
@@pommiebears Asking Sydney "What's your dad's phone number?" is hardly an interrogation and certainly wouldn't make any nine year child distressed. Actually just the opposite, they need it to contact him to make arrangements to take them out of police station.
@@ClassicBob100 --Pommie bears will always deviate from the evidence to slam OJ.
@@ClassicBob100 --The numbers were in the speed dial also.
Bring back Sherlock Holmes 🤣
Again, my remarks are in conjunction to watching the trial 22 years ago and hearing testimony again after watching the documentary.
CLASSIC PERFORMANCE BY THE GR8 F. LEE BAILEY.
He's a criminal so I'm not surprised he knows his stuff.
@BH I hope you continue watching this trial. Watch Bailey's competence in cross examining William Bodziak the FBI shoe print expert.
Cochran and Simpson wouldn't let him have any more witnesses after that debacle.
Terry Leddra exactly! He’s bloody wonderful.
@@terryleddra1973 -There are several cases in which the perpetrators of crimes would change the soles of their shoes to point in the opposite direction.A scientist in Texas murdered his wife ,walked away in the snow with the soles on backwards.
As of 2019, f lee bailey has been DISBARRED, STRIPPED OF HIS LAW LICENSE...DOUCHEBAG.
Bailey chomp chomp, wipe mouth. Mic drop. Lordy these cops would rather play dumb than admit they rushed to judgement. They didn’t rush they were zero to 60 when furman got there and u know he said OJ did it
Julie Alley - They got lucky. Speed had nothing to do with.
Fuhrman was right wasn't he. Of course they rushed to Simpson. History was really against him with the abuse and everything. The police can not be blamed. They did everything right expect some details. They gathered the most important proof and that should have been enough if it wasn't for the prosecution putting everyone up on the stand for the defense to create reasonable doubt.
@@NeverGiddy -Last time ,the photo of Fhurman pointing at the Bundy glove were taken past 7.30 am after he allegedly found the Rockingham glove.No evidence a glove existed before.
@@philipwilliams1754 - Welcome to the law Philip . . . I thought you knew everything.
"In the law, testimony is a form of evidence that is obtained from a witness who makes a solemn statement or declaration of fact"
First Riske, then every other police witness who testified after provided the evidence of the existence of the glove at Bundy, starting as early as 12:20 am or so. Evidence Philip. You don't know what evidence is, do you? And remember from your other post, Riske doesn't lie. His testimony is evidence.
~
@@NeverGiddy -You are acting as if they would've arrested Fhurman if they saw him planting evidence.
why does F Lee Bailey remind me of my cousin Vinny
IS THIS THE MAN.... WHO WRECKED THE BUFFET?! F Lee bailey sound like the guy in Eddie Murphy movie. Lola
Hahaha!!
Wrecked the buffet at the Harold club this morning !!
Next of kin is the norm. Her parents would qualify since they were divorced.
Next of kin of the children are?? OJ Simpson. The children were at a police station, and they needed picking up, and they needed their daddy before the news of their mothers murder was told to them.
Bailey's interrogation of the police is incredible, my the police officer is so arrogant that the cop wore his uniform to the court house. They've been so stupid for so long they think their the law, until there confronted by the law. And the lying or I don't know or I don't understand what you mean by that 🤡🤡🥕
Perhaps you should learn to spell: It's INTERROGATION. And it's spelled LYING, not "lieing". 🙄
And...
Learn correct grammar: "THEY ARE" or "THEY'RE" *_not_* "their" and likewise with "there"...again it's "THEY ARE" or "THEY'RE"...
*_Before_* *calling others "stupid"...* 🤤
@ Kenneth Charles what.an.intelligent.retort.
I rest my case...
@@veesea8889 Have a Happy 4th of July 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸 God Bless America 🙏🏻🙏🙏🏽🇺🇸
@@kennethcharles1386 Yyyyeah, I'm not American. So please don't assume ONLY Americans watch TH-cam.
And in my country we actually convicted the sports hero who murdered his significant other...so there's that.
@@veesea8889 really sad that you feel that way about life, it's just a matter of celebrating Americas Birthday 🎂 do you have to be Amercian 🇺🇸 to show respect.
Rossi decided to go to Rockingham 4 hr's after he arrived at the murder scene.
the cops did a sloppy job because they did not know who was the victim until Fuhrman arrived. whether it was frame job I am not sure, but for certain were incompetents.
Why should they know who the victims were, when does any cop know that when they first enter the crime scene?
@@IanP1963 I think that they saw some pictures with OJ in the house and they realized that it is his wife. Fuhrman knew for sure that she was his ex wife because he went to the house when she called the cops after he was violent
@@roc7880 Does it really matter if cops know or don't know who the victims are or were, it's the protection of the crime scene and evidence that initially matters ????
@@IanP1963 you are correct. the cops who entered the crime scene said there were not trained in handling evidence and I think is plausible. the LAPD was in a bad shape in the 90s poorly trained and supervised.
I always thought that OJ was guilty, but F Lee Bailey has a real and rare talent for cross examination.
How can ok be guilty when Furhman plead the 5th for placing the glove..and the other 5th Ammendment.
He was definitely guilty lol
@@moniquefrey-jackson3977 Fuhrman plead the fifth when he was asked about his use of the N word, then every question he was asked thereafter. The defence realised this so they asked him specifically about planting the glove
@MrGrace you must didn't look at all the evidence lies told evidence tampering sloppy police and detective work
@@MrGracenot according to the 12 that matter lol😂
SOME OF THESE OJ TRIAL VIDEOS ARE CUT OR EDITED.
Yes… to remove the identity of the Jury
Public service announcement . THE SUN IS NOT A FRIEND TO YOUR SKIN..... NO ONE SHOULD LOOK ORANGE . OMG
Missed Rossi's testimony in '95 but his testimony proves the had plenty of times / ways to notify Simpson w/o going to Rockingham
I totally agrre!! It is absolutely RIDICULOUS for lead to detectives to leave the crime scene and go to notify someone of a death...they were full of bs...i feel in my heart and soul Fuhrman planted evidence. OJ may or may not be guilty but those assholes planted evidence!! No doubt!
Lisa K - You are entitled to a feeling in your heart and soul, but there is no evidence Mark Fuhrman planted anything.
Yes there is Brian Russell. Under oath he pled the 5th after being asked if he planted evidence in this case. That is all the evidence, and then some that one needs to understand he was a poor and worse yet crooked detective.
B Trimble - If you understand what pleading the 5th means, he has to plead the 5th to everything he's asked. If they'd asked him if he was the second gunman behind the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza he would have pleaded the 5th. Doesn't mean he was the gunman. You have to plead the 5th to everything, you can't be selective. It isn't an admission of guilt to plead the 5th. No evidence was presented he planted any evidence in any case. If he was such a bad cop and planted evidence, why did no one contact the defense on their 1-800 number and tell their story. Cochran would have put them on the stand. Cochran didn't, because no one called, because he'd never framed anyone before this case or during this case.
~
He did not "have to" plead the 5th on everything. That was a choice, to me the burden of proof is gone, reasonable doubt is established and one can assume evidence was at least tampered with, if not planted. He was not required to plead the 5th on every question, that was a choice to cover his lying ass.
F Lee Bailey is a phenomenal cross examiner and defense lawyer. The brutal truth though, is it ethical to do your job as well as he does even though he knows that his client is guilty? I don’t believe so!
RG- How isOJ guilty,his arrest and charge was illegal.
A client is guilty only when she/he confesses in court to the judge of having commited the crime OR , via a trial, when a jury convicts the person charged with the crime. Those two are the only legally-accepted, Constitutionally-sanctioned scenarios for a client to be recognised as officially “guilty”. If you have a defense client who pleads not guilty, then you have to work with that, and take her/his word for it, and devise a defense plan that works in the best interest of the client and one that is unassailable as possible. Aren’t we all in this republic protective of the legal principle that a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in court of law or when she/he confesses in a court of law? After all, the person you’re defending is your employer as well as your client.
If you ever care to watch even the most recent interview of Mr Bailey then you will know even now he says OJ Simpson is not guilty.
It absolutely is ethical according to the professional rules of ethics. It's unethical not to zealously represent your client to the fullest, end of sentence. The job is to test the government's case. Hold them to the high bar of proving every element of every offense beyond a reasonable doubt... the system works because defense attorneys do that. Even if there is video evidence of your client committing the crime, you have an obligation to defend that client. Bailey is well within the ethical bounds here. Lawyers represent clients every day where there is far more evidence than there was against OJ, believe it or not.
Sofia Lavish...
I thought
F LEE BAILEY was a
WINNER ♡
24:45 Bailey argues with him about the location of the walkway that runs along the house, and says both doors are accessible from it. The cop plays dumb and says you can't reach the doors from the walkway. They argue about this for two or three minutes, then the cop stipulates that while you can get to the door from the walkway, you have to walk on a short piece of walkway to get to the door. This has clearly frustrated Bailey.
Cop - "I thought you were talking about the walkway on the side of the house"
Bailey - "The walkway on the front starting at the gate, runs beside the house, all the way to the walkway in the back, doesn't it sergeant?"
Cop - "It also leads off to the front door"....
Bailey finally gives up, and says
"Let's move on, they went in through the garage at any event.... you never entered the house, you may not even know where the doors ARE, is that fair?"
LOL amazing
F Lee Bailey is of course amazing but also it’s so sinister they way they defend him. Idk I agree with the idea that we shouldn’t be able to just throw ppl in jail and the burden of proof falls on the government but you gotta know that those lawyers knew he did it and to watch them poke holes In the prosecutions case it’s hard to watch at times
I've watched this whole trial over the last 2seeks. I Thot this dude did this...but after watching the whole trial I don't think he did this...AFTER ALL THESE YEARS OF THINKNG HE DID....smh
Better shake your head a bit harder🤡😄🙄
The same here....I've come to the scientific realization that he couldn't have done it.
See he was credible to me cause he wasnt in too deep. An he answers seemingly truthful
no. if the cops mishandled evidence, which they did, there is enough space for reasonable doubt. which it was. remember it is up to the state to prove guilt not the accused
They really messed up why didn't they prepare the witness before they make them testify,and why when the crime was reported why did they send a rookie he didn't even take notes
@@dackieaollivierre3800 I know. the forensic experts of the DA were the worst I ever seen. Barry had a field day with them and it is the DA fault
@@roc7880 plz had they done there job instead of relying on all they evidence they had,all the witnesses they put on the stand got played by the defense team
The only mistake they made is not foreseeing F Lee Bailey and Johnny Cochran would be handling the case.
99.9% of other attorneys would not have drawn out and highlight the mistakes made.
It matters not that the crime scene was badly handled…… OJ’s blood was everywhere!
This guy looks likes Robert Blake.
😆
If you recall, it was their reasoning to go to Rockingham
Bailey destroying 😂 love hearing the panic on Marcia shouting objection to everything 😂
6:07 Marcia is throwing out random objections hoping one will stick…. The last one sounded like she was just mumbling to herself….
A that just proves to you that all cops Lie just to convict you look at Ralph Perez they’re all cheesy
“My Hair is Not a Jerry Curl “
-Marsha Clark-
“Objection your Honor..She should be held in Contempt!”
-FLee Bailey-
He's Grinding that stupid Cop up
Don’t let them investigate my crime scenes...you can watch Perry mansion and know the basic Shinto do
F lee was a terrible lawyer. I ciuld litigate better than him and i have no law training.
So basically, Mr. Bailey blurts out what he WISHES happened, not what ACTUALLY happened. When the Judge sustains an objection about that he says "oh, I thought somebody said that…"
You can't play the befuddled and confused old man in a court of law Sir... Well, apparently *he can but it shouldn't be allowed.
I've witnessed so many gross mind games and manipulations throughout this trial. The defense played this jury like a fiddle; they stupidly fell for every ounce of it...
Catch Ito having to inform him on California law
As they should the point is to put doubt in the jurors mind and so that's wat was done
F Lee Bailey got THE
JOB DONE....
♡
Says you.
I believe OJ was guilty but F.Lee is a beast in the courtroom
I felt OJ was/IS INNOCENT !!
I believe JASON SIMPSON IS THE KILLER !!
@@carolecompton9270 I think so too. 🤔
According to the defense. You should levitate in the air to process a scene. I can't believe the prosecution let them get away with this crap. A certain amount of evidence gets disturbed when processing a scene. Its a fact that you just properly document. Riske's answer to most questions should have veen " not my job"
This case was won by Bailey.
They destroyed this dude. So pretty much you had oj as a suspect and didnt look for anyone else. They immediately made oj the suspect!
Who else had a motive to slice and dice his ex wife like that? Lol
@@CandyisAwesome86-- Wrong,Ron were the intended victim,the assailants followed him to the murder scene.
The reason Rossi looked so much like a fool is because he was lying and F. Lee Bailey ( a seasoned lawyer) could smell a cover up a mile away. There was a stink on this case that OJ's dream team could smell. Rossi was part of the cover up that blew up in the face of the prosecutors.
Rip Bailey. This cross was masterful and they were tryna count u out as old….. you showed them. Mike drop
Get him a cough drop please
I think it’s important to point out that F Lee Bailey lost his license as an attorney a few years ago because of tax fraud and corruption
The kids, that's not relevant to this case and the grilling he gave to the cops
One Love it’s not relevant but it establishes a level of hypocrisy and irony
they were made up charges
@@roc7880 just like OJ Simpson’s defense and acquittal in this trial right?
Good. He is a showboat and douchebag. Yank that law license.
Pure grasping at straws. I get a kick out of all these comments saying how great Bailey was. Think about this: all of his questions (taken collectively to all witnesses) imply BOTH a frame job AND the LAPD incompetence. How do those 2 things coexist? And doesn't that actually mean there was a legit investigation here? And if that is the case.......doesn't that mean that some of the evidence is legit? And (finally) if it is.......doesn't that mean he is guilty beyond any doubt? If ONE drop of that blood evidence is legit.....he did it (without question).
If I was on the jury, I'd consider this an insult to my intelligence.
the incompetence was obvious to me. not sure about frame job
@@roc7880 No frame job means OJ is guilty. (Without question.)
The frame job was the rogue racist detective planting evidence by himself. Or let's put it this way Furman took one for the team while the other detectives milked the la taxpayers.
@@jerryyang3516 Sorry, if it was a frame job....it would have taken a lot more people than Fuhrman.
@@09rja took vanatter to plant the socks. Furman to move the glove to Rockingham. Plants made in heaven.
Jerry he has done this many times ok.Hater of anyone who do not look like him period. Have a good day.
6:56 "we are fucked"
Good grief! That was an exhausting INTERROGATION! 😪🥵🤪😵 I'm knackered and can only imagine how Sgt Rossi felt after that, almost...thraping. Hostile and belligerent! I thought lawyers were meant to object to hostility towards and badgering of a witness on the stand 🤯
Vee Sea
She objected multiple times.
@@aran125 not for badgering or hostility towards the witness
Vee Sea
What’s the difference? Her objections essentially implied that she felt that way. At least I feel so.
It's a murder trial for goodness sake he's not there to be nice🤦
This guy is la's finest ladies and gents lol his iq is that of my current cell phone battery 14 percent and in the red, all Cops are similar too..
I was shocked by how little Fung the forensic knew about his work, I train high schoolers who know more before they even come for training
LOL @ F Lee Bailey saying he's been working "since ten last night too"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡.
im doing it for robert shapiro because he on facebook
RIP F LEE BAILY
This is a St. Valentine's day massacre
F Lee Bailey may be a great lawyer, but he had his #1 Fan, Lance Ito for a Judge in this case. That helped Bailey look good here. It seems to me Ito showed a little bit of favoritism the whole Simpson trial.
F. Lee Bailey. . . . . Prime example of when arrogance is mistaken for intelligence. His "skills" are based on being able to question individuals that are required to answer his questions in a courtroom.
Disbarred enough said
Wayne -Revenge.
Yeah a poor old multi-millionare who won the case
And Fuhrman was indicted for perjury.
@@chrisdell5679So?
@@pommiebears Yeah, SO? Who cares who was disbarred? He got Shepard and OJ off and wrote tremendous books attorneys use to rattle p*gs.
criminalist fung photographed and collected the evidence of OJ's blood on and in the bronco and at both crime scenes before OJ even got back to Los Angeles that morning, so they flew on OJ's air plane, took blood from him invisibly while he wasn't even back in Los angeles yet LOL and my cat flies and dances
Photographed his blood where?
This is incorrect. Bronco blood was found a week later, seemingly out of no where. One of many reasons jurors had to give a not guilty verdict.
A Valentine's day, in LA ..
Such an incompetent police force omg fumbling mumbling stumbling incredulous !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This Marcia Clark lady just wouldn't shut up, she interrups every 5 minutes. IT'S ANNOYING..
She has too, it’s her only hope, she got dealt a bad hand by the lackluster lapd. On top of that she is up against top notch lawyers, F.Lee Bailey and Johnnie Cochran being legends.
But it's perfectly ok for Johnnie to do it to her, to not shut up, to interupt or object every 5 minutes during her questioning???
LOL! Alrighty then...
@@veesea8889 --Go away fool.
@@philipwilliams1754 exactly
Who was actually on trial?
OJ paid his lawyers millions to ensure everyone else was on trial except him. in hindsight he couldve gone cheap and hired a better call saul because the jury was never gonna convict him anyway as several have admitted. revenge for rodney king
I love F Lee Bailey
Marcia blowing a fuse.
Idk what f lee baily charged an hr. But asure you... He was worth double. Sheer genius!!! One of the best... Without a doubt.
Furhman has a history....
*Faltan los subtitulos en Español*
Some of these cops are sleeping
The bomb is coming.
He should of taken The Fifth..
Lol imagine that? One of the prosecution’s most key witnesses to the whole murder investigation invokes his fifth? The case would fall apart quicker than it actually did. 🤣
F. Lee. Bailey. ... legend!
31:48 Detective Roberts
36:24 amazing wit
Cops no team work here
Darden can't take it.
This is still fascinating in 2023! F. Lee. Bailey was a master litigator! Too bad that his talents was used to get a murder off the hook!
The bigger picture is that he showed that the prosecution/lapd did a crappy job on the case. They needed to do better.
Ok oi