What the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference means for businesses
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ย. 2024
- The Supreme Court of the United States has made a landmark decision to overturn the Chevron deference, a longstanding principle that required courts to defer to government agencies' interpretations of ambiguous laws rather than interpreting them independently. Brownstein shareholder and co-chair of financial services practice Leah Dempsey joins Catalysts to discuss the implications of this decision.
Dempsey explains that over time, conservatives have viewed Chevron deference as "a separation of powers issue." She notes that agencies initially tasked with interpreting "silent or ambiguous" laws began to see it as an opportunity to create "rules that may align with a certain political party."
Regarding the ramifications for the financial industry, Dempsey tells Yahoo Finance, "Dozens and dozens of new regulations have been coming out of the Biden Administration. Many have already been challenged in court and are in the process of litigation. But this will certainly give ammo to others that are looking to challenge new regulations." She also highlights that this ruling will impact regulatory clarity around emerging technologies such as AI.
About Yahoo Finance:
Yahoo Finance provides free stock ticker data, up-to-date news, portfolio management resources, comprehensive market data, advanced tools, and more information to help you manage your financial life.
Get the latest news and data at finance.yahoo.com
Download the Yahoo Finance app on Apple (apple.co/3Rten0R) or Android (bit.ly/3t8UnXO)
Follow Yahoo Finance on social:
X: / yahoofinance
Instagram: www.instagram....
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Facebook: / yahoofinance
LinkedIn: / yahoo-finance
#chevron #scotus #yahoofinance
![The Facts of the Chevron Case [No. 86]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_Pun4KfkyaA/mqdefault.jpg)
Hopefully this will roll-back the EPA, FCC, ATF and other out of control alphabet agencies!
@@backcountyrpilot it'll do way more than that including ones that protect workers and food safety
@@seangilmore355 state governments are 100% capable of doing that themselves cheaper and more efficiently.
@Diamonddogs1726
States with less health and safety regulations are far worse in terms of workplace deaths and injuries. Some states, especially conservative ones, are gonna have as little regulation as possible.
@@andydavis3075 please excuse me while I play the worlds smallest violin for the death of the federal governments power. It will make me so sad to see bureaucrats in Washington DC lose their jobs because they will no longer be able to enforce their will without challenge. I really hope they don’t lose their pensions either. That would really upset me. Seeing bureaucrats homeless and desperate would is just so awful to think about. 😭
@Diamonddogs1726
It's not about bureaucrats having no jobs it's about health and safety regulations that Congress has the ability to repeal at their leisure.
Wooo whooo power back to the people!!!
This is a very interesting situation. Think about this let's say there is a certain medicine or perspective medicine that needs FDA approval let us say that medicine is not approved. Using this case but judge could simply override the decision of the FDA and approve the medicine. Is this really the type of government that we want in our modern age
@@tonystorcke FDA isnt our friend. Dont get fooled.
Good point. Each district will have their own meds depending on the judge's approval. Shortsighted decision.
Good bye Clean Water Act. Along with Conservation, Labor laws, and many more.
This means WAY more litigation, and the already-overburdened courts will be even more busy.
None of these cases would have seen the light of day if Joe & crew didn't attempt to overreach on an extreme level, Everything, I mean everything would have remained the same, but the current admin wanted to completely change the face of the USA in so many area's lawsuits were brought & and this is the result, let me say it once again, Nothing would have changed if there wasn't extreme overreach by the B iden camp! stew on that for a minute!
Does this mean I can delete my diesel now
From what I understand no. But it gives you a leg to fight on and challenge the EPA if they do pursue you in any type of case
In other words it gives the power back to congress and not non elected officals.
@@jamesalexander1981 no judges not congress
It means that unqualified judges get to make rulings on what chemicals are dangerous, what pollution is allowed, what financial practices are legal, what drugs are safe to use; I’d rather have actual experts decide those things since the Roberts Court is taking bribes from rich corporations.
@cathiehutcheson6556 every branch of government are owned by big corps.
@@cathiehutcheson6556 which experts work in government agencies again???? Agencies are also bought by corporations.
Agency heads are appointed out of the same corporations they are meant to protect you from, and you have zero chance to have them removed, or to even hold them accountable for their horrible decisions. A local judge on the other hand, you vote for them and can remove them if you don't like what they're doing. This makes you more free. Stop complaining.
Oh the experts, the same experts who were actually extremists who refused to have conversations on the topics, what in fact happened was the people who were at the top of their field were cancelled, accounts shutdown on social media, they were badmouthed made to look less than so the activist experts could bring down their rules. these were your experts. sorry but if we can't have open conversations on topic you don't have experts!
There's already forever chemicals in our water and foods 😂 bless your heart
It most definitely is a separations of power issue. The administrative branch has for a long time over reached it’s boundaries for example our court systems half our court systems are administrative judges, which means you’re going to jail for somebody or at the hands of somebody that didn’t have the authority to put you in jail and our court systems are actual judicial members have done nothing.
It has been abused and out of control. Good call.
Your advice has cost me $55,000 never again
Nesara/gesara
I really hope so brother
So do I have the freedom to burn tires?
I never stopped lol
That's awesome!! It's about time. And if they try is illegal. This is great thank you supreme Court!!! The Democrats are always sneaky
Chevron Deference:
Scre₩ the political interest of companies over stepping Liberty with corrupt processes.
Many of those regulations were put in place after someone was maimed or died. they were made from spilling blood
FESG
Is she wearing a mask??? Hmmmmm
This not only helps the taxpayers in finance but across the board, medical, financial, and environmental!!
Basically it stops the regulators making decisions that benefit them instead fo the taxpayers
Google the pollution in the 70"S. Scotus just ruled that cooperation's can kill us again
@@conniegilchrist6925 stop with your fear mongering, if you think for a second anything close to that would ever arise your in a bubble.
Too many women talking
Win for the people bad for the investors and politicians corruption osito corruption
Do you remember the fires on the Chicago river. The smog over every industrial area?
@@conniegilchrist6925 if you believe this will ever happen again you're lower education then i thought was possible, let me school you on a fact people seem to overlook: None of these cases would have seen the light of day if Joe & crew didn't attempt to overreach on an extreme level, Everything, I mean everything would have remained the same, but the current admin wanted to completely change the face of the USA in so many area's lawsuits were brought & and this is the result, let me say it once again, Nothing would have changed if there wasn't extreme overreach by the B iden camp! stew on that for a minute!
🎉haha
What are these people getting it wrong on purpose