The Oldest and Most Primitive Galaxy in the Universe: Why It Has Not Formed Stars Yet

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Did you know that astronomers accidentally discovered a galaxy with no stars? This galaxy, called J0613+52, is one of the oldest and most primitive galaxies in the universe. It is filled with gas that has not formed stars yet, and it could help us understand how galaxies were born and evolved in the early cosmos. In this video, we’ll tell you more about this amazing discovery and what it means for our understanding of the universe. Don’t miss this rare and exciting opportunity to explore a cosmic mystery.
    Chapters:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:55 How did astronomers discover this dark galaxy?
    02:37 What makes this dark galaxy so unique and intriguing?
    04:55 What can this dark galaxy teach us about the history and future of our own galaxy and beyond?
    06:49 Outro
    07:40 Enjoy
    Best Telescopes for beginners:
    Celestron 70mm Travel Scope
    amzn.to/3jBi3yY
    Celestron 114LCM Computerized Newtonian Telescope
    amzn.to/3VzNUgU
    Celestron - StarSense Explorer LT 80AZ
    amzn.to/3jBRmds
    Visit our website for up-to-the-minute updates:
    www.nasaspacenews.com
    Follow us
    Facebook: / nasaspacenews
    Twitter: / spacenewsnasa
    Join this channel to get access to these perks:
    / @nasaspacenewsagency
    #NSN #darkgalaxy #noster #primordial #cosmicmystery #galaxyformation #galaxyevolution #astronomy #space #science #discovery #GBT #VLA #HST #radiowaves #hydrogen #quasar #starformation #coldarkmatter #hierarchicalclustering #cosmology #universe #history #future #MilkyWay #dwarfgalaxy #ultradiffusegalaxy #Lymanalphaemitter #cosmicshadow #cosmicdance #NASA #Astronomy
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 51

  • @MadMike_X
    @MadMike_X 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

    If this galaxy is one of the oldest we have found. Wouldn't that mean we are looking at it while its still very young and its not actually billions of years old? (like how if we are looking at a star 5000 light years away, we see what was happening 5000 years ago)

    • @vesawuoristo4162
      @vesawuoristo4162 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes

    • @JohnnyAngel8
      @JohnnyAngel8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Oldest in time, not oldest in its own age.

    • @MadMike_X
      @MadMike_X 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JohnnyAngel8 3:20 was where my question came from

    • @Pauser71
      @Pauser71 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      1:25 says galaxy is located 270 million light years from earth, suggesting it has aged billions of years but we are observing it in a 'relatively' recent state

    • @MadMike_X
      @MadMike_X 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's interesting because we have found galaxies over 13 billion away. And it had claimed oldest and most primitive. I guess i missed that.​ Thanks for the info. @Pauser71

  • @mattpike7268
    @mattpike7268 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Question @NasaSpaceNews
    How do we know it is actually a galaxy?

    • @ShrineMaster
      @ShrineMaster 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The same reason they know Pluto isn't a planet. They just called it something other than a cloud.

    • @sabahatali398
      @sabahatali398 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea

  • @brucemedley69
    @brucemedley69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Yeah! Found in my state of West Virginia! Radio Telescope Green Bank. Love it ❤️

  • @megazordou3023
    @megazordou3023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How can you tell it is one of the oldest? It's relatively quite near us, so we do not know how it looked like a bilion years ago

  • @thekingofmojacar5333
    @thekingofmojacar5333 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    In the beginning there was light (energies, particles, gases etc.) and then everything came into being!
    We knew this wisdom already thousands of years ago!
    A bit strange, isn't it?
    I am personally convinced that after the end of the previous universe's existence, our current, (still baby) universe was formed within a protective plasma supported by a large quasar group (black holes)...

    • @davidferrara1105
      @davidferrara1105 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bullshit. You think it's a guy with a big beard. Forget it.

  • @NunoPereira.
    @NunoPereira. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    There are estimated 100 billions of galaxies out there. But now much more are to consider. Like these newly discovered empty star galaxies. This one happens to be in the Milky Way neighborhood: at 270 million light years away they're at just 2% the distance from the Big Bang.

  • @robertoveson3688
    @robertoveson3688 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It's weird to watch a NASA channel mispronounce words like quasar and pulsar 😂

    • @Mavrik9000
      @Mavrik9000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      It's not an official NASA channel.

  • @LSheWolf84
    @LSheWolf84 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've actually been to that observatory in West Virginia! It's so large and that place is awesome!

  • @JeffreyChilds-hj8sn
    @JeffreyChilds-hj8sn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Food for thought at the least

  • @Mico..
    @Mico.. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice I didn’t know that was possible 👍👍👍

  • @KlarenceMS
    @KlarenceMS 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    they're haven't found quasai star?

  • @vikasgupta1828
    @vikasgupta1828 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks

  • @futurepredictionispossible664
    @futurepredictionispossible664 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there black hole at the centre?

  • @mindblowtimes
    @mindblowtimes 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It is just gas without a black hole. Perhaps only dark matter.

  • @PursueAndObtainKnowledge
    @PursueAndObtainKnowledge 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There's a good chance that all the missing matter in the universe is not missing we just can't see it because there are no stars there. Imagine something like a Solar System except instead of a sun it's an ice giant Or a Jupiter like planet with other gas giants revolving around it Maybe a couple stones mixed in. and some space dust

    • @Simmuz1980
      @Simmuz1980 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Dark matter" constitutes more than 90% of the matter that makes up everything.
      Pretty hard not to spot such gaseous formations for such a long time, considering they'd literally be 10 times more abundant than the visible stuff. Just imagine the noise produced by such a large amount of matter.
      Additionally, the universe is apparently accelerating, which would confirm the presence of "dark energy", produced of course by "dark matter".
      This would reconcile with Einstein's concept of gravity in his theory, which allows it to be both attractive (the one we experience) and repulsive (the one responsible for the accelerating universe).

  • @allensaunders449
    @allensaunders449 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its not really old it's actually very young when we see it

  • @marianagyorgyfalvi3659
    @marianagyorgyfalvi3659 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's good that we see those from bing bang and we don't see at least one new star that would be part of the present! Like this or Andromeda riding on us, it just had to collide with us already!

  • @skpjoecoursegold366
    @skpjoecoursegold366 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Dark Matter?

    • @ximalas
      @ximalas 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Maybe, but dark matter isn't supposed to have any EM interactions, only gravitational interactions.

  • @TheOtherSteel
    @TheOtherSteel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1 - You say a galaxy has been discovered that not even our most powerful telescopes can see.
    2 - You list the telescopes that can see the galaxy.
    3 - Quasar is pronounced "quay-zar," not "qwa-zar."
    4 - Pulsar is pronounced "pul-sar," not "pul-ser."

  • @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv
    @BiswajitBhattacharjee-up8vv 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks God we need not change our definition of neither galaxy nor the starting event.
    Serendipity.

  • @frankbrumbeloe4827
    @frankbrumbeloe4827 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I guess I don't know the difference between a gas cloud, nebula, and galaxy...

  • @vaughnlonganecker986
    @vaughnlonganecker986 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The obvious evidence is that this Galaxy was made at the same time as ALL of the universe.

  • @TorontoRaptors77
    @TorontoRaptors77 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No this galaxy is located 270 million light years away, so its not the earliest galaxy smh

  • @ElenarMT
    @ElenarMT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    "Qua-ZaHr"? Really? Sounds like one of those annoying AI voices

  • @user-zj8jc1lg4r
    @user-zj8jc1lg4r 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ?????????

  • @Silenced23
    @Silenced23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Those rainbow colors. I think we should name it, 'LGBTQ+52'

  • @SeaMonster81
    @SeaMonster81 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too old… can’t have babies anymore

  • @deemisquadis9437
    @deemisquadis9437 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your impossible to watch. Lies, lies, lies.