Dialectic of Enlightenment Intro Part 1

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 7

  • @tombouie
    @tombouie ปีที่แล้ว

    Thks &;
    The bestest explaination so far.
    I'm a retired physicist & now have some respect for moderrn philosophy, thks again.

  • @BrittanyLennox
    @BrittanyLennox 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This helped me study for my exam! Thanks, from Canada!

  • @islamallosh1490
    @islamallosh1490 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A great introduction. Thank you, Prof. Nicholas.

  • @squid-squad
    @squid-squad 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jeff, in tax laws, it is forbidden for a minister, priest, rabbi or rabbit to instruct a parishioner to vote for this or that. In the United States that will take away their tax exemption. You had mentioned this as a possibility in a sentence connected to the answer of "who do you listen to(?)."

    • @thisisnotausername
      @thisisnotausername 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is an extremely naive take. People take political cues that are implicit, that follow logically from the sermons they hear, and the statements of those around them.

  • @pjeffries301
    @pjeffries301 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey, thanks for this lecture. Not a student, just enjoying. Wondering....why you professors on youtube never recommend folks actually read the text? I seem to get so much more from these lectures if I read the book first. Just sayin.

    • @andrewg3196
      @andrewg3196 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's called an "introduction". Often you see introductions like this, which give some context and insight into the main ideas of the text, at the beginning of a book. It is assumed you will read the book afterwards. What you're asking is like saying "why don't restaurant menus ask you to eat the food?". It's implicit.