วีดีโอ

Your lecture is very much useful as well as understandable. Thankyou so much for helping me to understand this particular work by MacIntyre

this is a brilliant set of resources, thanks for making available online- very useful in laying the groundwork for my dissertation! many thanks.

These have been rather helpful, thank you.

Thks &; The bestest explaination so far. I'm a retired physicist & now have some respect for moderrn philosophy, thks again.

Very nice thank you for your time.

may i have the slides of your presentation?

thanks for this, would you describe Hegel's Alienation as a sensation of being misplaced in the world.. like feeling "alien" to the situation and by making our consciousness aware of itself we would somehow disconnect ourselves from that sensation of misplacement? .. Then Marx comes and materializes the idea just like you said at the end. thanks again

This is perfect. You were able to explain a complex philosophical concept in plain and simple language which is easier to digest, but without compromising the essence of what alienation is. Looking forward to more of your lectures.

Clear explanation! Thank you so much!

dude you make way too many speaking errors. hegel is already confusing enough, you make it even more impossible. fail.

Where does Suvin talk about the fact that sci-fi cannot critique science?

Would you consider a 2% inflation target from a central bank explanation? Deflation would help the worker.

7:40 practice

Yes! The left needs to ground itself on the Rock of Christian charity

𝔭𝔯𝔬𝔪𝔬𝔰𝔪 😕

Hegel was originally a scholar of Dun Scotus.

Hi! Can you recommend some secondary literature dealing with this topic? Great video btw Sir!

This is a great overview. Thank you.

th-cam.com/video/MA7ge5qqQf8/w-d-xo.html

Pretty good until the end where you shut on China

This guy was a POS

Thank you for this wonderful lecture.

Cool

do you want to know more about philosophy come and take a look at my database

do you want to know more about philosophy come and take a look at my database

thank you for your amazing work!

Hi Jeff, I'm completely new to this ("What, morals?" -self burn), so I apologise if I have the wrong idea. Are you and MacIntyre saying that there is no [real] free will? For example, what if I am a fifth generation Trolley operator? But I don't want to be. As a child, my father invested in my future by sending me to the top Trolley Schools in Europe, damn near sent the family broke, but he did it anyway. All because he had decided that I would be a trolley operator. And yet despite being inducted at a young age, along with ignoring my father and grandfather's classic Trolley banter, I exercised my own free will and said "No. No, I will not be a trolley operator." But once I lost my job at the university (their humanities dept became an Amazon Prime eMarketing course or something), I soon realised that the bills weren't going to pay themselves. At this point, I am middle aged with not a lot of career options. I have actively lived my life to ensure that I never saw the inside of trolley. But now I am at a crossroads. Is my moral agency the lesser for having taken the trolley job? I understand that I'm buying into the whole 'One or the other' argument, and clearly I should not have had children or bought a house in the first place, given that my financial situation was constantly in flux. But the market used to be okay, and condoms break; stuff happens. So now I am a Trolley operator. I don't want to be, but I have actively made the choice to feed and house my family. But I still have Free Will, right? (Pardon the comment vomit :))

Ola! Jeff, what is the main point of the "dependent rational animal"? Hoping for your active response! 😅

What kind of References are you using ? very helpful video !

So when a member of the public tells a police officer to take off his badge ... the officer has been acting without moral agency.

Thanks for the extra knowledge

take a shot everytime he says uhh

Thanks helped me out, Greetings from europe!

is duress defined the same as it is in juresprudence?

Would an emotivist agree on that hurting is objectively wrong?

Thanks for the video this really helped me.

Dear Professor Nicholas, Thank you for your response. I wonder if you could email me your notes about the "real question" if you still have them. I found you talk to be a useful way of looking at the many systemic problems in our country. I would like to comment on them after I get the remainder of the talk. My email is WaterPartnership@SBCglobal.net Thank you!

Thank you so much

great, thanks :)

Thank you. Good lecture.

great descriptions

That's fine. Take a crowbar to society and deconstruct it. All we'll be left with is the natural state of man. A war of all against all.

Can people be incontinent towards a certain issue and virtuous in another? Or are the characteristics of incontinence, continence, viciousness, and virtue encompassing the character and disposition as a whole?

7:14 if you have a friend you are lucky, if you have two friends you are blessed by the gods, if you have three friends you are a liar.

This a banger of a video

Despite ur gallant effort Horkheimer and Adorno still remain abstruse and incomprehensible. It's a shame

Im the unusual person lol

here's the link for the fox news video video.foxnews.com/v/2970589487001#sp=show-clips

Jeff, in tax laws, it is forbidden for a minister, priest, rabbi or rabbit to instruct a parishioner to vote for this or that. In the United States that will take away their tax exemption. You had mentioned this as a possibility in a sentence connected to the answer of "who do you listen to(?)."

Horkheimer basically repeats, updates, and elaborates on Lukacs' critique in "Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat",