Why are Billions of Dollars Worth of Ships Being Intentionally Destroyed? | Economics Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มิ.ย. 2024
  • This video was made possible by our Patreon community! ❤️
    See new videos early, participate in exclusive Q&As, and more!
    ➡️ / economicsexplained
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    The Economic Explained team uses Statista for conducting our research. Check out their TH-cam channel: / @statistaofficial
    This is the Carnival Imagination, a luxury cruise liner worth hundreds of millions of dollars, which just 10 short months ago was touring passengers in extreme comfort to exotic destinations all over the world.
    This ship is sailing dead ahead to its final port of call, where it has been sold for scrap alongside dozens of other ships that have become the latest victims of the global pandemic.
    The Chittagong ship breaking yard in Bangladesh is the largest of its kind in the world, and in the past few months even its abundant shores have become inundated with pleasure cruises and industrial cargo ships alike that all could have otherwise sailed the oceans for many more decades.
    These are all very troubling signs for the unsung heroes of our modern global economy, the merchant marine fleet. Every year trillions of dollars worth of cargo is transported on ships like these and losing this fleet could turn into a huge barrier to global trade.
    But what is really going on here?
    Why would profit-motivated companies destroy billions of dollars worth of productive assets? Sure times are tough, tourism and trade have declined massively but this hardly looks like a reasonable response right?
    I don’t burn down my house if a video gets less than 10,000 likes, so why would companies in such a competitive industry do something equally as self-destructive?
    Well as always it has to do with economics (go figure) and to understand this bizarre behavior we need to understand a few key areas.
    What are the economics behind the merchant marine fleet?
    How do these factors make it financially viable to destroy ships?
    what does this mean for the future of international trade?
    And what does this all have to do with Chinese bridge building?
    Enjoyed the video? Comment below! 💬
    ⭑ Subscribe to Economics Explained 👉 bit.ly/sub2ee
    ⭑ Enjoyed? Hit the like button! 👍
    Q&A Streams on EEII (2nd channel) → / @economicsisepic
    ✉️ Business Enquiries → hello@economicsexplained.com
    Follow EE on social media:
    Twitter 🐦 → / economicsex
    Facebook → / economicsex
    Instagram → / economicsexplainedoffical
    #MerchantMarine #Shipping #EconomicsExplained
    ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
    ECONOMICS EXPLAINED IS MADE POSSIBLE BY OUR PATREON COMMUNITY 👊🙏
    Support EE by becoming a Patron today! 👉 / economicsexplained
    The video you’re watching right now would not exist without the monthly support provided by our generous Patrons:
    Morgon Goranson, Andy Potanin, Wicked Pilates, Tadeáš Ursíny, Logan, Angus Clydesdale, Michael G Harding, Hamad AL-Thani, Conrad Reuter, Tom Szuszai, Ryan Katz, Jack Doe, Igor Bazarny, Ronnie Henriksen, Irsal Mashhor, LT Marshall, Zara Armani, Bharath Chandra Sudheer, Dalton Flanagan, Andrew Harrison, Hispanidad, Michael Tan, Michael A. Dunn, Alex Gogan, Mariana Velasque, Bejomi, Sugga Daddy, Matthew Collinge, Kamar, Kekomod, Edward Flores, Brent Bohlken, Bobby Trusardi, Bryan Alvarez, EmptyMachine, Snuggle Boo Boo ThD, Christmas

ความคิดเห็น • 4.9K

  • @Quickonomics
    @Quickonomics 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3928

    Imagine being one of those poor guys who have to drive their ship to the scrapyard and make their way back home on foot...

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1198

      hahah I legittimately wondered what happens to these guys. Those breaking yards are less than ideal places to be walking through. If someone knows how the crew gets off these ships afterwards please let us know.

    • @sownheard
      @sownheard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      XD

    • @dongster529
      @dongster529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1108

      @@EconomicsExplained Obviously they swim back. What a foolish question. :)

    • @saasda6255
      @saasda6255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +263

      @@EconomicsExplained probably get flew back by the company

    • @emperorpalpatine4995
      @emperorpalpatine4995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@saasda6255 by the owner’s private jet

  • @billandpech
    @billandpech 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3237

    SUMMARY: Ships are not making much money during the pandemic while the price of iron skyrocketed due to China's infrastructure building during the pandemic. You're welcome!

  • @jqad3984
    @jqad3984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +752

    "China is building so much infrastructure that the price of iron has rose over 300%"
    flashback from Victoria II

    • @jonikasemi
      @jonikasemi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

      God forbid China westernises. In-game economy be going kaboom.

    • @johannmuller3711
      @johannmuller3711 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      China is buying all iron scrap in the word to prepare for worldwar nr 3

    • @deshraj669
      @deshraj669 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      @@johannmuller3711 nope, China is smart they know they cannot come even close to Us in military power so they are using economy and technology to defeat them and it's working good for them.
      China's main goal is to secure only South China Sea that's why they are increasing there naval power.
      They'll use 'one belt one road initiative' to assert dominance. That's why they are investing trillions on this project.

    • @supremebohnenstange4102
      @supremebohnenstange4102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@deshraj669 Africa is under heavy Chinese influence already aswell

    • @urcheese9074
      @urcheese9074 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That is why you always bully china into explosion

  • @ZeusTheIrritable
    @ZeusTheIrritable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1299

    The next innovation in cargo shipping: Sails.

    • @kullen1041
      @kullen1041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      I was legit thinking of this halfway through th video😂😂😂❤️, would be great if we figured out how to propel the behemoths across water without fuel.

    • @ZeusTheIrritable
      @ZeusTheIrritable 3 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      @@kullen1041 It makes some sense. If people could come up with efficient sail setups using only old-timey technology, I image we could come up with something using modern materials and technology that could at least increase the fuel efficiency of current engines using sails.

    • @kullen1041
      @kullen1041 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ZeusTheIrritable for sure

    • @skinz1877
      @skinz1877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@ZeusTheIrritable this is currently in the process. Not yet at ships of this size and magnitude tho.

    • @africkinamerican
      @africkinamerican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It's called wind power

  • @matthewkelleyhotmail
    @matthewkelleyhotmail 3 ปีที่แล้ว +511

    I was the Chief Fire Patrol on the Imagination for years. When I discovered this video and saw my old ship going to the breaker yard I almost cried. I have a lot of memories from my time there.

    • @kristir1262
      @kristir1262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      I'm sorry. That must be hard. What're some of your favorite memories of your time on it? (if you're okay sharing, ofc)

    • @matthewkelleyhotmail
      @matthewkelleyhotmail 3 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      ​@@kristir1262 I started working for Carnival in 1995 and when I left Carnival's MS Tropicale and was sent to the Imagination it seemed so cutting edge to a 20 something year-old that the technology seemed at that time like an opportunity similar to what it must be like to work on the shuttle or something. In 1997 that ship was an amazing opportunity for someone from a small rural volunteer fire department like me. Carnival had figured out what they had done wrong with the MS Tropicale and the Celebration and when they re-designed the Imagination they did things right. It had state of the art CO2 total flooding systems in the engine room and control room, all the fire equipment was top of the line U.S. standard not European like previous ships, and it had an impressive fire detection system. The new infrared system was not like the old system where you had to run to investigate 25 alarms per day from about 4,800 smoke and heat detectors. The panel was on the bridge and the person watching the panel could sit in a leather chair 10 stories above the ocean with amazing views. The company paid over half a billion dollars for the ship and it was still an amazing luxury liner the day it was scrapped. Just working on it was a matter of privilege. After 9 years working onboard for Carnival I wanted to go back and sail on it again someday as a guest. Going back would be like going back to an old house where you used to live. I have fond memories and it is so hard to believe that the company would scrap such a nice functioning ship. The ship was doing cruises this year and was supposedly still in really good condition after dry dock and re-fitment only 4 years ago.

    • @Nphen
      @Nphen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@matthewkelleyhotmail Imagine if the American government and Congress had any sense and was willing to pay to preserve these amazing ships for the next year or two until a vaccine is delivered. Instead, we are scrapping perfectly good ships just to set the global economy up for a massive shortage in a few years. When I saw the high quality of the cruise ships being sent to the scrapyard, I almost cried myself. Millions of Americans would be willing to pitch in money to form a co-op to run these ships so more people can go on cruises. It's just totally insane how many marvels and wonders of mankind have been allowed to be destroyed in the past century. From historic schools and train stations in Detroit to New York to LA, just to name a small portion.

    • @alessandrorona6205
      @alessandrorona6205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Nphen those ships could be used as temporary housing for poor people or as sleeping quarters for people that could not find a rent for a decent amount of money in areas where rents are too high.

    • @axilleas
      @axilleas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@Nphen I get where you are coming from and on an emotional level I agree with you. The problem is that the industry is going to take much more than a year or two to recover. The aviation industry expects at least a 5 year span before they get to 2019 levels of demand and they have business travelers as well, the cruise industry is just pleasure so it might be closer to a 10 year period till they recover. It's a sad situation whichever way you look at it, really.

  • @promstar
    @promstar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +458

    As a former seafarer there is a tail risk from this pandemic that I think few consider. During the Covid-19 pandemic almost no countries were willing to take in disembarking crewmembers and thus many ships hade problems carrying out crew changes. I’ve heard stories of crewmembers ready to go home when the lockdown started. They stayed onboard for months. Some missed their weddings, births of their children, family members dead and buried without them being able to be there. Many will never return to the sea, some will have PTSD from this period. A global lack of seafarer can really halt the global economy. They are truly unsung heroes.

    • @thelastaustralian7583
      @thelastaustralian7583 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      AI Seafaring Automation.

    • @hudsondunn8385
      @hudsondunn8385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@thelastaustralian7583
      People I know now have PTSD and it sucks
      TheLast Australian: Let me suggest the option were you are jobless.

    • @benlarson9775
      @benlarson9775 3 ปีที่แล้ว +60

      @@thelastaustralian7583 Automation can only go so far. Sure it might replace or heavily augment the deck side, but the engine room will still need skilled engineers to maintain it. An AI can't fix a jammed valve that is cutting off your coolant water to your main engines. And if the ship blacks out, the AI goes with it.

    • @yay-cat
      @yay-cat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Seafarers include chefs, photographers, cleaners, entertainers, engineers, mechanics, salespeople, beauty therapists...... AI can maybe steer
      But yeah I’ve got a few friends who’ve had to make some major career detours

    • @scwirpeo
      @scwirpeo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@benlarson9775 The thing here is tho, the technician won't be the one choosing if the ship needs him or not.
      It's a guy in a suit on the NYSE who can't pick that boat out of a lineup let alone tell you how one works. AI can replace nearly everything and the part's it can't will become the only area where companies can "cut overhead". AI will take more jobs than just the ones it can actually replace.

  • @ezragoldberg3132
    @ezragoldberg3132 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Wow, in the subtitles it actually said "twice as long and twice as Thicc" Amazing attention to detail!

  • @NickSiekierski
    @NickSiekierski 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    It'd be great to see a breakdown of the types of goods that have dropped in demand and those that have spiked over the past year. Obviously more people than ever are shopping online and tons of things are still being shipped from China and elsewhere, but I assume the demand for heavy industrial goods, vehicles, raw materials, etc. has dropped and hasn't nearly been offset but the increase in online consumer sales.

  • @gaz3097
    @gaz3097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +591

    Han solo: chewy, where's the millennium falcon?
    Chewbacca: GGGRRRRRRRRRRRR (in Turkey being scrapped)

    • @nickmattio3397
      @nickmattio3397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      “But Chewy She Did The Kessel Run In 12 Parsecs!!!”

    • @magamike1800
      @magamike1800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@408Magenta time to scrap star wars. woke trash.

    • @tarstarkusz
      @tarstarkusz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The name of this channel should be "economics confused and wrong" He has obviously never heard of the concept of malinvestment and the term "market distortion"
      The fact that China is malinvesting so much resources that it has distorted the steel market to the point that ships are worth more in scrap value than to keep them, even with a downturn is not "good policy" or "big brained"

    • @theotherside931
      @theotherside931 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      *Bangladesh actually.*

    • @gaz3097
      @gaz3097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theotherside931 ain't no Bangladesh in my story.

  • @kevtron1991
    @kevtron1991 3 ปีที่แล้ว +901

    I'm not even a sailor and watching these ships get scrapped still hurts.

    • @mr.2minutes161
      @mr.2minutes161 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      more painful for me watching people who scap it in bangladesh

    • @MrWest949
      @MrWest949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I saw my first real cargo ship cross that final bar, it hurts. I even performed the shutdown of a ship older than that, sister ship to the Al Faro

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      It reminds me a bit of how aircraft part manufacturers had to buy titanium golf club heads just to get enough of it, back in the 1990s.

    • @kyle18934
      @kyle18934 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@mal2ksc golf club heads are made out of titanium?

    • @cedricvillani8502
      @cedricvillani8502 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your all too soft and squishy think about how many Chinese lives are saved, and the ocean life being killed by the cutting down on Crude These thing pump.....................

  • @sayftysayfty4228
    @sayftysayfty4228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    In Germany, retailers are warning that there are not enough goods and to start buying Christmas presents early. I think that has something to do with your video topic. I am impressed that you have virtually predicted this.

  • @tomorrow6
    @tomorrow6 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    And now - can’t find enough ships for the cargo - which of course does make the remaining companies more profitable

    • @anajalo5981
      @anajalo5981 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Exactly what I was thinking rewatching this

  • @hyperscore6810
    @hyperscore6810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1646

    This must of been the first EE Video that didn’t mention Norway

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +471

      ahh I will have to do better next time

    • @vodkabullet4066
      @vodkabullet4066 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@EconomicsExplained I live in norway

    •  3 ปีที่แล้ว +133

      Don't worry, when an EE video does not mention Norway, there's always a comment that does. Thank you for your service by the way.

    • @robbiehorninlow1520
      @robbiehorninlow1520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Well I’m not watching it now, thanks for the warning

    • @benjaminanderson2028
      @benjaminanderson2028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@robbiehorninlow1520 😱

  • @EconomicsExplained
    @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1162

    A timely reminder that everything you change in the economy changes atleast two other things.

    • @ssik9460
      @ssik9460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Unless it’s communism, then you can just “pacify” the other problems

    • @ivebeenfound1575
      @ivebeenfound1575 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Why does it say 20h ago when it just got uploaded a few minutes ago

    • @fdr8343
      @fdr8343 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Get rid of the 22nd amendment. I will stop the destruction of such ships! The ocean is beautiful, but our economy might as well be at sea level

    • @atirix9459
      @atirix9459 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sounds like a cucked version of Newton's 3rd.

    • @pimme043
      @pimme043 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You make very good videos

  • @Bartonovich52
    @Bartonovich52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    The other important part about the economy of using ships is their operation also benefits from globalization. They have flags of convenience, pay minimal taxes, have cheap labour, and can be scrapped where there are few labour or environmental regulations.

  • @davidprietogomez7254
    @davidprietogomez7254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This Chanel has the best economic discussions Iever heard in my life. All topics are developed so elocuently and taking into account the most important factors. Something that seems easy to do, but that very few acomplish. I really liked it

  • @jakebrod7
    @jakebrod7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1743

    “Out of fear of sounding like a Wendover Productions video” 😂😂

    • @mahdihasan8293
      @mahdihasan8293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Lol loved that one.

    • @pancakeperson7401
      @pancakeperson7401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

      Literally almost forgot this was an economics explained video XD

    • @ryangarcia6475
      @ryangarcia6475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Wendover do be better doe

    • @Geoffr524
      @Geoffr524 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Caught this one also.

    • @miketv3845
      @miketv3845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Best reference

  • @Sluggishbeef6
    @Sluggishbeef6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +528

    Let’s not forget for the last decade they made WAY too many ships. Scrap ships to raise the low prices!

    • @kathieharine5982
      @kathieharine5982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      And the stupidity of making far too many ships was exacerbated by the Federal Reserve Board when it kept interest rates near zero thereby tempting the greedy to open their orderbooks for more ships.

    • @neilkurzman4907
      @neilkurzman4907 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@kathieharine5982
      And why would you think the monetary policy of the United States we drive shipbuilding by other countries? The United States doesn’t have a large merchant marine.

    • @kathieharine5982
      @kathieharine5982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@neilkurzman4907 Where do you think the zero interest money ends up? It has nothing to do with the small size of US flagged ships. Just examine where ships are financed. Follow the money.

    • @neilkurzman4907
      @neilkurzman4907 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@kathieharine5982
      So you believe the United States finances the entire shipping fleet of every country in the world? I am certainly not going to say that low US interest rates doesn’t create some perverse incentives.
      You did not describe how you know that this is one of them.
      Follow the money? Certainly why don’t you lead me.

    • @mitchellcorona8
      @mitchellcorona8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      China made too many ships, they dumped them on the market to gain market share and close western shipyards.

  • @christianknuchel
    @christianknuchel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    I love how we've gotten to the point where the sensible basics of sound economic policy, such as government investment in infrastructure in times of crisis, are "big brain" moves now.

    • @jakemocci3953
      @jakemocci3953 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      I can’t even remember the last time an American politician mentioned infrastructure.

    • @bonawang4995
      @bonawang4995 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      ​@@jakemocci3953 Actually, I remember Trump talking about infrastructure quite often when he was running for presidency. Not that he's done a lot to actually improve it tho.

    • @dreamlessjejune3880
      @dreamlessjejune3880 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I liked the presentation, I want him to take this further and explain the risks of infrastructure, housing, tariffs, etc. however investing in infrastructure itself is a risk or else China, Japan, Europe would do it in earnest... you see China is paying premium now for something they could have done on the cheap 5-10 years ago, with a huge reduction in global demand and investment the consequences of maintenance and lack of economic growth can make this move a disaster in the next 2-10 years if they miss the mark, the same could be said of housing, tax adjustments, farm subsidies, even wars, etc. etc.
      So he perhaps overly summed it up as big brain, and chuckled at Australias housing plans, (or the USAs cash in pocket plan,) but we will see.

    • @alexanderfretheim5720
      @alexanderfretheim5720 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China has a big advantage in this stuff though, which is that they have a relatively cooperative form of government that doesn't include an adversarial planning process. In the US, the regulators are always trying to kill you. They also have much more rational decison-makers than America does, and would understand subtle nuances like the advantages of freeways over high-speed rail when connecting Cleveland with Columbus (in their case, Qinzhou with Chongzuo, as those two cities in far Southeast China you've never heard of are about the same size and would have a similar economic relationship) or what a cost-benefit analysis is.

    • @johns6704
      @johns6704 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      democrats have funny ideas about what the word "infrastructure" means...

  • @peterpayne2219
    @peterpayne2219 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am blown away by how smart I feel after watching this. Subscribed.

  • @JM-5150
    @JM-5150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +402

    I've been a merchant mariner for 27 years. Sailed every where I wanted to go. Industry isn't dead yet. Depends on where you work and the type of vessels. Oil field is slow and towing isn't much better. Survey is still going pretty well. Pay has been drastically reduced but I'm comfortable making 80k for 6 months of work. Being a licensed Chief engineer for the last 20 years has been fun, but unless you are ready to be gone and miss just about every holiday do your research. It's not for everyone.

    • @pc2753
      @pc2753 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Wish I'd done that career. 😒

    • @boatybear1013
      @boatybear1013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Holidays?
      80k for 6 months....
      6 months of holiday surely?

    • @razzrack
      @razzrack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      wait untill the United Nations agenda 20 - 30 catches up to you ...research

    • @ktoectbkto
      @ktoectbkto 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      80K as a Chief Engineer is kind of low. At least twice as much.

    • @pc2753
      @pc2753 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually now glad I didn't do that career if everyone in it is that coin obsessed

  • @bug5654
    @bug5654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +441

    "10 short months ago..."
    Imma stop you right there...these are 2020 months.

    • @leandersearle5094
      @leandersearle5094 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      How many years has it been 2020 now?

    • @bug5654
      @bug5654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@leandersearle5094 I know not, I merely survived the age of September knowing winter was coming.

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Imagine thinking that the pandemic's unfolding disaster wasnt caused by the Politicians.

    • @jwadaow
      @jwadaow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@TheBelrick No can do.

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jwadaow you de man. Keep repeating the truth for the Enemies who have hidden themselves among our politicians, will try and lie that the economic disaster isnt caused by their lockdowns.

  • @SEven-pk4rk
    @SEven-pk4rk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great show. First time seeing you. Found your work inspiring and informative. Thank you 🙏

  • @guillaumegervais8290
    @guillaumegervais8290 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really interesting video. Keep up the content. Great channel!

  • @aurandon
    @aurandon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +340

    04:19 Trolling Wendover Production lol

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +273

      Haha no troll, just don't want to encroch on my man sams territory, he has transport, RLL has corolla's, I have Norway

    • @215rsudhir9
      @215rsudhir9 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@EconomicsExplained xD bruh 😂

    • @sriyadityasrivatsa5346
      @sriyadityasrivatsa5346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@EconomicsExplained XD

    • @sarasij1477
      @sarasij1477 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@EconomicsExplained Gib me Norway too

    • @icekick1173
      @icekick1173 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dividing up the world i see, i well and truly expect nothing less than in 30 years you guys being on the board of shadowy figures running the planet

  • @cyclonicleo
    @cyclonicleo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +691

    Kinda not surprised to see this. In a way, its overdue, just due to the costs of running these fleets. The timing is opportune; scrap the old , inefficient ships for cash, cut down on labor costs, plan and build more efficient ships. This puts money into the hands of shipbuilders, stimulating local economies, the fleet operators can be more profitable in future as well as seeing efficiency gains, plus China gets its iron fix. Or something like that....

    • @raoulraoul7129
      @raoulraoul7129 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You sir are totally right.

    • @paulsz6194
      @paulsz6194 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      cyclonicleo kind of like when we everyday people upgrade our 20 year old cars that have done over 250K KLM, it becomes too expensive to maintain, when you can get a new or newer car for the same amount of money that it costs to Maintain the old one.. Even if you buy a 5 year old car with 80-100K km, the original owner can afford to go to a car dealer and purchase a new one again.

    • @Mr30friends
      @Mr30friends 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      "simulating local economies" = simulating china, japan and korea

    • @ianmcmahon8589
      @ianmcmahon8589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@timwaagh It takes years to design and build a new series of ships. They are betting that the market will be going again by then.

    • @brianellsworth4767
      @brianellsworth4767 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree with your comment and never needed to watch the video

  • @beachbum4691
    @beachbum4691 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always impressed by people who are naughtier than me. (and better informed) Brilliant - thank you so much for posting :) now I have the beginnings of an understanding :)

  • @compresswealthdivideeconom3757
    @compresswealthdivideeconom3757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Before finding out, I say besides taking out a few key parts is that when you have layers of steel welded together, it becomes way too costly to tear it apart as opposed to mining iron ore and making new steel.

    • @wewilldiehere
      @wewilldiehere 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not with paid like a slave labour!

  • @MashZ
    @MashZ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Yup. Chittagong, Bangladesh. You can thank us for taking up so much of our beach to recycle the whole world's ships instead of building expensive beach resorts

    • @GodsMistake
      @GodsMistake 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And look who has the jobs now and which industries have failed. Tourism has no future; recycling and sustainability, however...

    • @liamandrade5167
      @liamandrade5167 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And the everyone clapped

  • @jg5875
    @jg5875 3 ปีที่แล้ว +118

    Correction that there is a “New Panamax” class that takes advantage of the new, larger locks at the canal. Goes up to 366m

    • @christopherwaugh690
      @christopherwaugh690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn't hear new panamax mentioned in the video. It basically makes old panamax obscelete. Did I just miss it?

    • @jg5875
      @jg5875 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@christopherwaugh690 Video did not mention "New Panamax"....hence my comment :)

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @D R no. there was some random suggestion by a chinese billionaire to build a canal through nicaragua which was in no way supported by the chinese state, but all western media is like "china wants to build a canal through nicaragua"

  • @ManpreetSingh-qv6lq
    @ManpreetSingh-qv6lq 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely explained,loved it
    Thanks

  • @jameseddy6835
    @jameseddy6835 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I knew about global economy but never to the extent that you presented it. Good work.

  • @Pasteurpipette
    @Pasteurpipette 3 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Switzerland is actually a quite bad example of a landlocked nation in this scenario. Basel is directly connected to the major port of Rotterdam by the Rhine river, and the Swiss merchant marine is the largest of any landlocked country.

    • @sunnyjim1355
      @sunnyjim1355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      These massive boats that are more efficient at shipping, are not going to go down the Rhine. So, the cargo from them will have to be transfered to smaller ships... that's another overhead that's a disadvantage.

    • @Pasteurpipette
      @Pasteurpipette 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@sunnyjim1355 Oh absolutely, I agree. But the Rhine river happens to be a extremely busy waterway, connecting Basel, Cologne, Dusseldorf, the Ruhr and Arnhem to the sea. In fact, interfacing between river and sea is the basis for most of the world's busiest seaports (eg Alexandria, Antwerp, Rotterdam, Hamburg, Shanghai, South Louisiana, Tokyo).

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Pasteurpipette -Columbia River system USA case in point. Idaho french fries... to China ;

  • @alainduncan3756
    @alainduncan3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +555

    9:00 You lost me at "Responsible governments will..."

    • @alitlweird
      @alitlweird 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Lost you? Why’s that? There’s like two or three responsible governments. (maybe)

    • @alainduncan3756
      @alainduncan3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว +89

      @@alitlweird Because there is no such thing. The entire purpose of government is to benefit the politically connected at the expense of everyone else. There is no rational incentive for them to act "responsibly".

    • @paulfarese9072
      @paulfarese9072 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@alainduncan3756 You are 100% right

    • @SamuraiUjio
      @SamuraiUjio 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Was he being sarcastic when he said the incentives for the Australian government to continue funding the housing market won't end badly?

    • @theovanbooma8508
      @theovanbooma8508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@SamuraiUjio absolutely

  • @jquinterov
    @jquinterov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent video on an interesting and timely topic

  • @pepehabichuela1004
    @pepehabichuela1004 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good upload, thanks!

  • @Death_Saved
    @Death_Saved 3 ปีที่แล้ว +850

    Here's a question, is china scrapping its own ships as well, or are they aiming to control the shipping market by blinding their competitors with short term profits?

    • @ar.suhaimihashim8080
      @ar.suhaimihashim8080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +183

      Very very good question! And the answer is probably YES!!!! They are building ports all over the world!

    • @sudilos1172
      @sudilos1172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

      Let’s play Bingo.
      Bingo, you win!
      Also they are building a massive Navy

    • @jarryl7520
      @jarryl7520 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      That’s a smart move ngl

    • @ShearF3ar
      @ShearF3ar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      probably takes a month to make a ship. if the shipping market came back with that much demand it wouldnt be hard to get back in.

    • @atiger4716
      @atiger4716 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Clever question

  • @dennissalisbury496
    @dennissalisbury496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +228

    When your Living In a house of cards, you begin burning your furniture to stay warm.

    • @ldkbudda4176
      @ldkbudda4176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      That happened in the 1917 socialist Russia.

    • @sharefactor
      @sharefactor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      *you're

    • @lifeisgood5619
      @lifeisgood5619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you saying the trading system are cards and the ships are furniture?
      Is scraping those ships really a bad thing though?

    • @dennissalisbury496
      @dennissalisbury496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@lifeisgood5619 This is an expression an engineer I worked with used to describe deporting our industrial manufacturing base to Asia.

    • @lifeisgood5619
      @lifeisgood5619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dennissalisbury496 oh okey thanks (:

  • @user-yr7m2
    @user-yr7m2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Earlier this year oil price went into negatives"
    That hurts my soul. We have gas prices way over 8$ per gallon.

    • @JustMe-nf1mf
      @JustMe-nf1mf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What hurts my soul is that it is 100% unecessary for us to still be an oil based economy :o( Greed, selfishness, & ignorance will be the end of us :o(

    • @Muljinn
      @Muljinn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your ignorance is simply staggering.

    • @thefarter6462
      @thefarter6462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JustMe-nf1mf your ignorance is absolute

    • @notjustforme8857
      @notjustforme8857 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      should be $200 per gallon. limited resources should be the most expensive things and continue to get more expensive.
      but it's the same all around the world, comfort creatures not willing to accept responsibility are ruining the world for generations to come.

  • @janein6491
    @janein6491 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good explanation, thank you.

  • @lylestavast7652
    @lylestavast7652 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    scrapping ships (oldest) has probably also reduced a lot of expenditures on upgrading engines on them related to IMO2020 requirements on fuels/scrubbers. Where some of the oldest may have been bunkering in the newer low sulfur MFOs, they can now skip that premium and build new ships with state of the art engine systems - not having to take an active asset out of service for a year or more to refit in the process - they can sit on the cash and be planning instead...

  • @calingog2645
    @calingog2645 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I clicked on this video semi-reluctantly, as I didn’t think it sounded that interesting. But this was fantastic! Love all the connections you pointed out, how one decision on one side of the world leads to consequences on the other side. Great channel!

  • @markbarber7839
    @markbarber7839 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video.

  • @rooseveltdumornay4954
    @rooseveltdumornay4954 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very entertaining and informative. This isn't something I would normally watch, but you managed to make a boring subject like economics fun and interesting to watch. I actually enjoyed watching.

  • @Ishmaelstene
    @Ishmaelstene 3 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    "What's going on here" 😂😂. The best of Australian accent

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      ** WoTs gOin oN EErE

    • @sargesacker2599
      @sargesacker2599 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      BEKFAST!

    • @JoeGreeneFilmsOslo
      @JoeGreeneFilmsOslo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@EconomicsExplained Will we see EE merch bearing the "Wot's goin' on 'ere" slogan?

    • @TheBelrick
      @TheBelrick 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Communism. Don't be fooled, stimulus packages are simply Communism. The Federal Reserve is rapidly seizing the means of production via monetary inflation into the share market. The next depression will be far greater than the first.

  • @financial.affairs
    @financial.affairs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +469

    It's more profitable to destroy then to maintain

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +106

      yep pretty much, sad stuff none the less

    • @relife6764
      @relife6764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@EconomicsExplained well considering alot of older ships runs on heavy fuel oil (or diesel, depending on route), and have inefficient engines, i have to say that from the perspective of ONLY clean air, not including the pollution from ship breaking, scraping old ships are a good idea.

    • @lcmiracle
      @lcmiracle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@relife6764 Sad thing is though, after the pandemic passed (and we are beginning to see it at least in the developed countries), demand for crusie ships will eventually raise again, and manufacturing of new cruise ships will spike, producing a sudden surge of carbon emissions from power generations and transportation of resources.
      Edit: not just cruise ships, ocean liners and such, just, all kinds of ships.

    • @Invizive
      @Invizive 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      It's a bit more complicated, of course.
      It's safer to scrap now then build new in case the demand comes back than take a risk maintaining currently useless ships that would keep losing value even without work.
      Look at a bright side: shipyards now have a chance to get more money from shipping companies in the future - some spike in demand for their services will probably occur. Not to mention the current demand for scrappers who get a lot of work right now.

    • @bftjoe
      @bftjoe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@lcmiracle Pollution for construction is tiny compared to operation. Same wrong already debunked logic is often applied to electric cars.

  • @qaarloshilaal2778
    @qaarloshilaal2778 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Watching this a few days after the Suez Canal cargo problem is a trip :p

    • @oldvlognewtricks
      @oldvlognewtricks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Watching this as failing global supply chains are causing inflation to skyrocket even moreso…

  • @rajiburrahman8176
    @rajiburrahman8176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I am from Chittagong. Ship breaking is a huge business in Bangladesh.

  • @SpeakHearSeeNoEvil
    @SpeakHearSeeNoEvil 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    10:55 because shipping companies will receive more money for the steel from scrapping their ships and not continue to pay millions in crew costs, insurance, maintenance etc
    Saved you 11mins. You're welcome.

    • @CanadianArchaeologist
      @CanadianArchaeologist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      China needs steel, probably to build up their military.

    • @laxcatthesleepycat2688
      @laxcatthesleepycat2688 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@CanadianArchaeologist or their own merchant fleet

    • @fredericp64
      @fredericp64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Can we please vote this comment up to the top!

    • @ukaszw6623
      @ukaszw6623 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ships are built to make profit not to make costs.

  • @FinnUnv
    @FinnUnv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Last time I was this early, was the last video, again. Great video, gonna go sell my dad's car for scrap metal now.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      haha I feelk like the patreon gang might have a bit of an unfair advantage here.

    • @FinnUnv
      @FinnUnv 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@EconomicsExplained just maybe :) but I don't pay to be first I just _invest_

    • @Tryckert
      @Tryckert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@EconomicsExplained Definitely becoming a patreon supporter once I graduate college and get a great job. Love this content

  • @Troublechutor
    @Troublechutor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very cool explainer. Cheers!

  • @amschelco.1434
    @amschelco.1434 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think i found my favorite channel.. economics 👍👍👍!!!

  • @mr.personhumanson6871
    @mr.personhumanson6871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    It's gonna suck while half-way through scrapping a ship, the price of steel suddenly plummets

    • @BaronSamedi1959
      @BaronSamedi1959 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That doesn't concern the shipowner. He gets paid once he delivers the vessel to the breaker yard. There are even specialized traders that buy ships for scrapping and pick them up anywhere in the world, pay the owner and sail it to Turkey or Bangla Desh or somewhere in Africa where labour for scrapping is cheap and safety or environmental regulations are non-existent. Now, however, the EU has put a stop to that practice and each EU shipowner must show that his (former) vessel is being scrapped in a responsible way or else he risks huge fines.

    • @ibubezi7685
      @ibubezi7685 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BaronSamedi1959 "Bye bye EU!" Shipowners selling to some non-EU holding company - that then scraps it the 'normal' way.

    • @flimsyjimnz
      @flimsyjimnz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      -and vaccines jumpstart global economies back into *buy buy buy*

    • @bobs6129
      @bobs6129 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It won't plummet if you control the supply

  • @a.emotional243
    @a.emotional243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +272

    3:56 "twice as long, twice as thick, and twice as h-"
    brain: "hard?"
    video: "high"
    oh

    • @billmelcher625
      @billmelcher625 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      thiccc

    • @OptimisticalBilly.9001
      @OptimisticalBilly.9001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      b r u h

    • @xedasxedas
      @xedasxedas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      "Now c'mon man don't make it sound like a fat plumpy delicious c@ck"

    • @sunnyjim1355
      @sunnyjim1355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Proof, if any was needed, that IQ is falling fast.

    • @a.emotional243
      @a.emotional243 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sunnyjim1355 My iq is probably higher than yours

  • @davidt783
    @davidt783 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very interesting. Thanks

  • @Lillarpy
    @Lillarpy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @peredavi
    @peredavi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    I left merchant marine as Third Assist engineer after 4 years ,used my savings(saved over 70% of income) put myself thru flight school and 5 years later got hired by major air cargo company. Retired this year, age 59 as 747 captain.

    • @thedarkdestroyer5063
      @thedarkdestroyer5063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      Well done pal,but what point you trying to make ?

    • @jlhistory
      @jlhistory 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice man, what was life like as a merchant marine

    • @e7venjedi
      @e7venjedi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What was your motivation for leaving merchant marine?

    • @eliaslundstedt5607
      @eliaslundstedt5607 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thedarkdestroyer5063 That the average person is their own demise by not being smart economically I suppose, because few do what he did. And what he told is also just speaking of, the subject of the video

    • @murraycharters6102
      @murraycharters6102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That would not work right now during Covid, you would do better as a third assist engineer.
      I retired at 76 , rather I was made redundant along with everybody else . I was a Coach driver for Greyhound Australia.
      I retired from full time work at 61 but very quickly got bored. I had been driving coaches on weekends and just kept doing that. I didn't need the money but I enjoy driving, traveling and the people I met from all over the world.

  • @Joshua-jk1om
    @Joshua-jk1om 3 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    As for someone heading into the merchant marine field, this is VERY alarming.

    • @sudilos1172
      @sudilos1172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Get ready to get sunk and raided by the massive Chinese fleet. With few other ships around , who will notice when yours disappeared

    • @isimvol
      @isimvol 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well the video mentioned that this is the best type of transportation.. Just sucky times..

    • @davidlongworth3030
      @davidlongworth3030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ships are really bad at navigating fields.

    • @JM-5150
      @JM-5150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I've been a merchant mariner for 27 years. Sailed every where I wanted to go. Industry isn't dead yet. Depends on where you work and the type of vessels. Oil field is low and towing isn't much better. Survey is still going pretty well. Pay has been drastically reduced but I'm comfortable making 80k for 6 months of work. Being a licensed Chief engineer for the last 20 years has been fun, but unless you are ready to be gone and miss just about every holiday do your research. It's not for everyone.

    • @benjamingrimes3304
      @benjamingrimes3304 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I wouldn't worry about it...we will always need ships to move people and goods. It's just going through a transformation, which happens in every industry.

  • @mannyespinola
    @mannyespinola 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video

  • @dolvana
    @dolvana 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job!

  • @MarioLaubacher
    @MarioLaubacher 3 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    Note that Switzerland has access to maritime trade through the Rhine, with container ship routes going from Basel to Rotterdam.

    • @NotADuncon
      @NotADuncon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Smaller ones tho

    • @NotADuncon
      @NotADuncon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @HeedArmy83 yes but the point still stands that it has a harder time trading than countries with access to the sea

    • @mrspeigle1
      @mrspeigle1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah, the Mississippi river is great for shipping, but a bit of a difference in flat bottom barges and super container ships.

    • @mns8732
      @mns8732 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrspeigle1 you're correct. Without navigational rivers the u s would have sunk quickly. Not having it almost lost the country politically.

    • @alexanderfretheim5720
      @alexanderfretheim5720 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah that's actually true. Switzerland's handicap in manufacturing is an excessively strong currency that makes it more expensive to buy their goods outside of Switzerland than within it, and also makes everyone elses goods cheaper in Switzerland, not a lack of maritime access.

  • @mrfatmancory
    @mrfatmancory 3 ปีที่แล้ว +229

    Why are we up right now its like 1 am in sydney go to bed.

    • @EconomicsExplained
      @EconomicsExplained  3 ปีที่แล้ว +121

      oh mate my bedtime is normally around 5am, but thanks for looking out for me :)

    • @dru4670
      @dru4670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@EconomicsExplained it's 9 am in Canada 😂. I like to think you make these videos for us Canadians 😂

    • @digitalpetor
      @digitalpetor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@EconomicsExplained But it is a perfect time to watch this kind of videos in western Russia - 5pm here. At least for a quarantined student like myself

    • @lk6912
      @lk6912 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@digitalpetor Good job comrade, your English is impeccable.

    • @sh4dow347
      @sh4dow347 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      its 17pm here mate

  • @nickg1895
    @nickg1895 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey I’m not sure if it was affected by the time of making this video but I saw you mentioned a cargo ship container would cost around €2200 to ship from UK to Australia. My dad works for a company that does business with China and he told me that they increased the shipping rate of the containers from around three to $4000 a container all the way up to $12-$13,000 per container today. The cost of shipping is actually rapidly increasing because of Covid and the reduced merchant fleets to deliver the product.

  • @dipimage1935
    @dipimage1935 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bravo! Great content.

  • @norml.hugh-mann
    @norml.hugh-mann 3 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    Cruise ships arent really considered the merchant marine in the US

    • @neilfrasersmith
      @neilfrasersmith 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Yes, my thoughts exactly. Covid 19 has decimated the cruise ship market, but merchandise still has to get moved around the world.

    • @GP-yc2it
      @GP-yc2it 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Find a cruise ship ported in the USA... They're all foreign-based ships.

    • @GP-yc2it
      @GP-yc2it 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@neilfrasersmith need money buy goods, stores need money to order stock... globalists are trying to break the system by attacking the logistics while crushing incomes.

    • @martinobrien1877
      @martinobrien1877 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      NCL Pride of America in Hawaii is the only US flagged cruise.

    • @bababistril
      @bababistril 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @NotAfraidOfLeftist somehow your name really goes to show, you have some serious issues 😂😂

  • @pragueexpat5106
    @pragueexpat5106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +378

    Me, a Mongolian subscriber: "I know man, I know.."

    • @aneek5784
      @aneek5784 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I feel ya man

    • @ganbat
      @ganbat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do you know ?

    • @matt-hew69
      @matt-hew69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That Grand Tour special they filmed there was EPIC. Beautiful country!

    • @pragueexpat5106
      @pragueexpat5106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@ganbat About landlocked countries

    • @pragueexpat5106
      @pragueexpat5106 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@matt-hew69 what grand tour special?, filmed by who?

  • @hg2.
    @hg2. 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting - thanks.

  • @gustavothespaniard9689
    @gustavothespaniard9689 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining

  • @TheDhammaHub
    @TheDhammaHub 3 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    Good thing I did not listen to the guys saying that those ships would just be sold to another company

    • @davidbeppler3032
      @davidbeppler3032 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Whoever said that was right. Just the company will cut them up and melt them down instead of putting them back out to sea.

  • @luizarthurbrito
    @luizarthurbrito 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    This channel has been steadily raising the quality bar over the last year.

    • @TriNguyen-mp8lz
      @TriNguyen-mp8lz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      definitely coming close to the level of lame joke as Wendover, I like it.

    • @officialdislikebutton8654
      @officialdislikebutton8654 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or your standards have been dropping

    • @IANinALTONA
      @IANinALTONA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Except that almost everything he said in the video is either wrong of irrelevant

    • @joostsmals640
      @joostsmals640 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IANinALTONA what is wrong? I am curious.

    • @owenstull8974
      @owenstull8974 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joostsmals640 Too many things to mention, but fundamentally he does not understand how long ships last, the 7 to 12 years taken to depreciate a ship on a shipping companies books, and the relationship between ship scrapping and ship building. Ships last between 10 and 20 years depending on the type of ship and physical and economic obsolescence. They do not last 40 years. Every year something like 5% of the world's feet is scrapped and 5% is replaced. If more ships are scrapped than are built obviously the fleet will shrink. Ship owners bet on future growth of trade and on the ability of ship builders to add vessels to the fleet. What the "economist" finds so alarming is part of a recurring cycle.

  • @huonwilson1268
    @huonwilson1268 3 ปีที่แล้ว +121

    "Australia used its fiscal spending to keep on propping up a housing market that definitely wont end badly" HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA

  • @yasinmahmudchowdhury1412
    @yasinmahmudchowdhury1412 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I live near that area, *Chittagong shipping graveyard* . The pollution here is off the chart. These third world countries have literally become the dumping ground ,global trash can of the first world countries luxurious lifestyles. Our area is getting the first hand experience of global warming. It's not sustainable. Sooner or later this lavish life style will backfire greatly in the near future.

    • @derekhieb7458
      @derekhieb7458 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes, and ship breaking is dirty business and is probably unregulated.

    • @garethbaus5471
      @garethbaus5471 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A lot of the pollution is probably the result of limited local regulation of the these areas (which unfortunately is probably why such areas are chosen l) and isn't necesarily inherent to the excessive waste of first world lifestyles.

    • @thetruthisoutthere6870
      @thetruthisoutthere6870 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm sorry to hear that, God will be taking note of 'those destroying that part of the earth' the Bible promises to 'destroy those destroying the earth' in the very near future, he will also restore earth & it's inhabitants to perfection. 🙏🌎👌

    • @FiredAndIced
      @FiredAndIced 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My line of thinking is dystopian, which means I should not proffer that suggestion.

    • @Dan_Tactics
      @Dan_Tactics 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thetruthisoutthere6870 the Bible says a lot of things.

  • @karl0ssus1
    @karl0ssus1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    "Prop up a housing market"
    Triggers in NZ

    • @magamike1800
      @magamike1800 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      20% increase over the last year. Jacinda said they cant go up for ever and then printed up another 28 billion for more low interest loans. She may be pretty buy she is dumb AF.

    • @tarstarkusz
      @tarstarkusz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kind of like what China is doing.

    • @ne0tas
      @ne0tas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i love crysis

    • @bubblegumgun3292
      @bubblegumgun3292 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tarstarkusz atleast china is building roads , you know as a capitalist i must say they made socialism work.

    • @tarstarkusz
      @tarstarkusz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bubblegumgun3292 Building roads and bridges that aren't needed isn't capitalism (or socialism). If you are building something for the purpose of employment and stimulus, you are by definition not building something because it is needed.

  • @yoannybatista4202
    @yoannybatista4202 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked and subscribed. Good job!

    • @user-le6wh2mf4u
      @user-le6wh2mf4u 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      C.o.n.t.a.c.t. M.e. O.n
      W.h.a.t.s.a.p *+1..2..1..3..2..9...7..4...3...9...0*
      Sorry for late response I was very busy
      Do well to respond 🙏

  • @glenngilbert7390
    @glenngilbert7390 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @billm3210
    @billm3210 3 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    A big cost for merchant fleets is they must go green and cut emissions down starting 2021 in addition to become for efficient and cut other costs.This was pre-covid. Only the big guys can survive.

    • @sunnyjim1355
      @sunnyjim1355 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      And that's the whole point... Centralization.

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      -One World Governance, 'Brave New World', or... "Some Pigs are More Equal than Others" ;

    • @s.m.281
      @s.m.281 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      you got the point.
      regarding the emission rules will be valid in 2021, the old-tech vessels will be prohibited while new vessels with less CO2 emission have been built for replacing those old ones therefore there have been excess container vessels in the market causing fleet price to decrease.
      with more cost - less profit , i still be in doubt how they withstand.

    • @drizler
      @drizler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I for one see most of this Global Warming as a pack of pure 💩. I grew up with the cries of the same sorts whining about the Millennial Ice Age coming our way. Then low and behold decades later (August 2020) the scientist leading the charge publishes his apologetic reaction saying he was 😑 wrong. Awww Gee. Probably seeking some last glimmer of notoriety.
      Anyways one of the few things I agree with in all this is the amount pollution you find in bunker oil. It’s really nasty,on a grand scale. I think I read someplace it was on the order of 2500 x as dirty as gasoline. Here in the North Country many institutions military bases and such all ran on that stuff via a big steam central heat plant. Most if not all have been modernized to diesel / HHO or done away with in favor of natural gas.
      I saw a couple documentaries showing quasi modernized ships running bunker and diesel the diesel being required for near shore operations. I can see where that ramps up the costs and they made a big show of that in the documentary. Sign of the times I guess. It’s probably just good financial sense to start over with new compliant gear. The world moves on.....

    • @Groza_Dallocort
      @Groza_Dallocort 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@drizler also I think diesel is better for the engine then bunker oil. It sounds to be that bunker oil really clog up the engine components faster then diesel does and soon we will go over to biodiesel that is even better then regular diesel

  • @oldmikie
    @oldmikie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nicely done. This is excellent explanaition. Explainning the logistics of the profit motive is terrific.

  • @tezausbra8
    @tezausbra8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video and analysis. How big is the EE team that puts this together?

  • @amschelco.1434
    @amschelco.1434 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good channel very buisness informative 👍👍👍👍👍 keep up channel more power!!

  • @Aurroral
    @Aurroral 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    An additional factor in determining the timing of scrapping is the periodic major survey that all vessels must pass in order to be insured (IIRC every seven years). If an owner knows that a ship approaching its due date for survey will not pass that survey without major repairs, the owner may not be prepared to invest that money in an older vessel. Under these circumstances, scrapping or sale/re-registration under a less stringent survey may be more attractive options.

  • @itsgarryb432
    @itsgarryb432 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Sustainable ship recycling is a must nowadays. Shipbreakers in developing countries should be able to implement ship recycling plans without incurring significant costs. A good idea might be that the entire shipbreaking process is carried out on a specially constructed bed rather than a muddy surface. By the way, great video Economics Explained! Very interesting, looking forward to the next one.

  • @araunapalm
    @araunapalm 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks!

  • @oligarchytheatre777
    @oligarchytheatre777 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent content

  • @Twinrehz
    @Twinrehz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I don't know why, but the phrase "so valuable that shipping costs are an irrelevant rounding error" was simply hilarious

  • @billpage5900
    @billpage5900 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    I like how he measured the width of the ship as "2X Thiccc

  • @adriandecu6846
    @adriandecu6846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding!!!

  • @anthonygibbs9245
    @anthonygibbs9245 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting

  • @Peichen01
    @Peichen01 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    0:00 - "This is the Carnival Imagination" while the stern reads Carnival Fantasy :D

    • @kaimanson3174
      @kaimanson3174 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I thought the same thing, but wasn't too sure if he was referring to the boat he was on. After doing a short research this is what I found out "Carnival Cruise Lines announced July 23 that the 1995-built Carnival Imagination would be placed in long-term layup, with no immediate plans for it to re-enter the fleet. On August 26, the ship officially embarked on its last journey, sailing from Willemstad, Curacao, to Aliaga, Turkey, where it will be broken up." According to Marine traffic Aliaga Turkey was the last port he was reported to be at. Too sad, it was actually the first cruise I got on.

    • @bieituns
      @bieituns 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he means the ship that the camera recording the fanatasy is on.

    • @gregh7457
      @gregh7457 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i would have thought the first one they scrapped was the diamond princess. Last time i was on it, it was looking pretty rough around the edges

    • @mal2ksc
      @mal2ksc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gregh7457 That's not a Carnival ship. "They" (meaning Carnival's executives) can't scrap a competitor's ship (unless they buy it).

    • @gregh7457
      @gregh7457 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mal2ksc which one isn't carnival? princess is owned by carnival btw

  • @captaingordon
    @captaingordon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Brilliantly presented. This reminds me of the series “Connections” by James Burke.

    • @LuciusDriftwood
      @LuciusDriftwood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wow! I recently 'connected' with this series a couple of months ago. It seems incredibly prescient. For your delectation.....episode 1 ;) th-cam.com/video/XetplHcM7aQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @phamnuwen9442
      @phamnuwen9442 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This entire video is cringe. Almost zero economic knowledge to be had here.

  • @phreddphlintstone297
    @phreddphlintstone297 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This is actually great news. I've said for the last few years that there are simply too many ships and too much tonnage by companies to service the industry. Rates have been so low several companies have gone under, before covid. Other shipping companies would keep increasing their fleets and the problem continued, too much capacity and not enough tonnage to be shipped worldwide even with rediculously low shipping rates of the last few years. Taking older ships out of the business will ease the problem for a bit, but only if they aren't replaced immediately will it solve the problem for the long run.

  • @marklivingstone3710
    @marklivingstone3710 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Hopefully a lot of the ships being scrapped are the rusty old single hull ships registered in dodgy ports that cause so much damage.

    • @mrspeigle1
      @mrspeigle1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep hopefully we will have a newer better Fleet as a result

    • @the_retag
      @the_retag 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Old crappy ships are likely the most economic to scrap

  • @swapnilsharma2794
    @swapnilsharma2794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Keep up the great work EE. I love this channel so much, I learn something new every day

  • @Stefi747
    @Stefi747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    “Australia used fiscal stimulus to keep propping up its housing market”
    *laughs in Canadian*

    • @alainduncan3756
      @alainduncan3756 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea this guy thinks that making housing less affordable while robbing people of their savings is somehow "responsible" economics? He obviously doesn't understand the first thing about economics. His channel should be renamed "Lies that government wants you to believe".

  • @bunnyr4690
    @bunnyr4690 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I did 2 contracts on carnival imagination and carnival breeze before getting off and settling in USA around 2013

  • @bradford2279
    @bradford2279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +257

    I cannot imagine the level of damage humanity will sustain from a few hundred wealthy families who have immeasurable greed. It is truly terrifying.

    • @alabar9795
      @alabar9795 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

      U won't need to imagine it... your going to see it. And FYI it's not being done out of greed. We are being culled my friend. Lock down was designed to wipe out independent business so corporations can boom in wealth so they can then weather the storm of the great reset. Then after body count will really start to boom. All planned decades ago

    • @sjoroverpirat
      @sjoroverpirat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@alabar9795 sure thing mate, but you got any sources for that claim?

    • @gauravroxs7566
      @gauravroxs7566 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Most humans are greedy , if you had the money and the power you would probably do the same thing too.

    • @Gaga682
      @Gaga682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Sad of all this we people let that happen under our noses that extremely greedy families destroy humanity and earth itself.

    • @Me-zo8yc
      @Me-zo8yc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Record profits for the big corporations while millions of small businesses go bust IS evidence.

  • @TheDrexxus
    @TheDrexxus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Before watching the video, I would assume that with these ships being unable to sail, they still have to be put in port somewhere and there just isn't enough space for them all considering ports weren't built to hold all of them as they were intended to only spend a bit of time there then depart. Also, it would cost money constantly for them to just stick around in port and I would assume with the sudden demand for port access with so many ships needing it, the prices have probably gone up. So ultimately, it would've cost more money in the long term to keep the ships than not to, especially considering that cruises got IMMENSE bad press over how fast diseases spread through them and they've had a lot of news coverage before that for other issues. They probably thought it would take too long for the cruise industry to recover and it just wouldn't be worth it for a long time and is better to just scrap them to get that stimulus of money to do something else with. So now i'll watch the video and see if any of that syncs up. :P

  • @spaceman081447
    @spaceman081447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    At 9:56 . . .
    China: ". . . that stimulus is coming in the form of infrastructure spending."
    United States: "What's infrastructure?"

    • @cloutmastermemes2007
      @cloutmastermemes2007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      China builds poor quality infrastructure it breaks down after 2 decades. And you do realize since China is an authoritarian state it has the ability to control its market. In reality
      It’s not as good as you think.

    • @blogengeezer4507
      @blogengeezer4507 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      -Willing to sacrifice Freedom? "Those who sacrifice Freedom, in exchange for Security, Deserve Neither" ;

    • @evm6177
      @evm6177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@blogengeezer4507 In other words like talking about some people who are crazy enough to speed with the absolute delusion of conviction that they believe they have a fool proof breaking systems fitted in their vehicles for keeping them safe & secure no matter how fast or far they take their freedom! Right? .. EXCEPT NOT EVERYONE'S GROWN UP AND MATURE ENOUGH TO HANDLE SUCH A DELICATE COMPLEXITY AS ABSOLUTE FREEDOM WITHOUT SECURITY / CONTROL! You really don't want to put that kind of hope & faith in all of crazy humanity.. 🍷

    • @liegesaboya8265
      @liegesaboya8265 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@cloutmastermemes2007 l don't have notice of any other authoritarian regime worst than United States of England . There isn't a single Latin American country that hasn't suffered with dictatorships implemented by the CIA . The same in Africa , Asia and Middle East .
      If it's not authoritarianism , my grandpa is a bycicle .
      Salute from Brazil .

    • @lynncomstock1255
      @lynncomstock1255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      California is leading the infrastructure way with its high speed rail to nowhere and converting EVERYTHING to non-fossil fuel energy sources. They can always supplement their energy needs with wood from the forests which are burning anyway with great regularity. However they probably would not be smart enough to harvest the wood that grows close to where people live and work. Will Rogers said, "When the Okies left Oklahoma and moved to California, it raised the I.Q. of both states." (I absolutely love that quote.)

  • @NomisCasio
    @NomisCasio 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:38 I would bet that this is Gibraltar. I have been kite boarding amongst those moored ships. When the wind conditions weren't ideal in Tarifa. Great times!

  • @daviscorporatellc
    @daviscorporatellc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:51 lolol " commodity prices go brrrr". Wall Street Bets hits the EE channel. Lol love it.

  • @petrvorlicek466
    @petrvorlicek466 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Wow, not only commercial vessels but even military battleships were limited by the Panama canal.
    This leads to question, where and how can you scrap some large inventions like battleships and space rockets?

    • @rkan2
      @rkan2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Space rockets? Traditonally you'd scrap them to a bottom of an ocean.. Besides, relative to their cost, the amount of materials put in to them, is once again a rounding error.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the large ones would probably just go around the continents the old fashioned way

    • @quisqueyanguy120
      @quisqueyanguy120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Spaceships are scrapped in a high orbit or in the pole of inaccesibility in the South Pacific Ocean.

    • @jonrolfson1686
      @jonrolfson1686 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The Japanese and the Germans built some battleships that were too wide to pass through the Panama Canal locks of the 1940s. The largest, last US Navy and Royal Navy battleships (the four Iowas and HMS Vanguard) can/could slide into those locks with a few molecules of air to spare.

    • @merkonerko2
      @merkonerko2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      A lot of warships these days aren’t sent to scrapyards but are sunk during live-fire exercises and turned into artificial reefs.