Flight of the Future - Science Fiction or Reality

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 2.5K

  • @you5711
    @you5711 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    indexed on February 14, 2022
    00:00 start
    00:54 introduction
    01:45 Northrop YF-23
    02:25 Lockheed YF-22
    05:02 thrust vectoring technology
    05:24 Sukhoi Su-37
    08:04 high-G training
    09:50 integrating pilots with automatic systems, modern cockpits
    10:12 eye tracking technology, voice command technology
    10:48 thought-controlled flight systems
    11:51 pilot error
    12:14 unmanned aircraft
    14:12 ultralight glider
    14:37 miniature air vehicles (MAVs)
    16:12 blade efficiency
    16:54 flapping wing models
    17:20 Charles Ellington insect wing model
    19:13 Charles Ellington insect wing aerodynamics
    20:25 insect sized micro air vehicles
    21:23 pulsed thruster prototype
    22:17 M2 lifting body
    23:59 Barnaby Wainfan lifting body
    28:54 blended wing body
    34:12 Concorde
    34:34 Tupolev Tu-144
    35:25 High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT)
    36:19 difficulty landing the Concorde
    37:06 windowless cockpits
    38:49 HSCT flight simulator
    40:20 new engines needed for flying at Mach 3+
    40:35 the jet engine was first invented by Sir Frank Whittle in the 1940s
    40:49 the biggest and most advanced jet engine in the world is the Rolls-Royce Trent 800
    41:27 North American X-15
    42:13 Space Shuttle
    42:43 spaceplanes
    43:02 air-breathing rocket engine prototype Hyper-X
    44:34 White Sands Missile Range, beam-powered lightcraft
    51:25 credits
    51:58 copyright 1998

    • @Vin_G
      @Vin_G 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Where's the tic tac?

  • @Zetauri
    @Zetauri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Although the technology presented in this documentary (from 1998) is considered outdated by now, it is a gem and great find on TH-cam! Thanks for sharing this!

    • @robohasse997
      @robohasse997 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks was looking in the description for the year this video was produced. 1998.

  • @piehound
    @piehound 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @ 20:06 "It's a low pressure region. *Things get sucked in* . . . " Getting sucked into various circumstances has been the story of my life. But do go on with technical stuff. I love learning about this type of thing. . . . even if it's not brand-spanking-new. It's still fascinating.

  • @THEMATT222
    @THEMATT222 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:36 pilot can speak to the jet plane
    Pilot speaks: repair the jet
    Jet hears: Prepare to EJECT!

  • @Tony-hs8mu
    @Tony-hs8mu ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The next barrier to conquer is the creation, development, and the advancement of technology. Manipulating the field of gravity and creating a mobile liquid or multiple fields using the planet's poles polarities. The possibilities exist.

    • @Tony-hs8mu
      @Tony-hs8mu ปีที่แล้ว +2

      First, what distrubes the gravitational field, that may be a part of the equation. On the atomic level the super conductors the atomic the electrons are slowed down it likely it may be the strength of the field be come much weaker. Frequency may be a way to control the fields. The structure and frame will need to be quite different composites of light gauges of metal or plastics. Frequencies are a part and active at base level of the atomic level and could distort create a warp tunnel that would need a containment field or fields. The Philadelphia experiment (if it was a real event would have something information that could be used.

    • @joshuabowkley3490
      @joshuabowkley3490 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WE DO THIS ALREADY

  • @SwampDonkey64
    @SwampDonkey64 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    23:56 . The pilot survived. Absolutely amazing.

    • @MrAnibl
      @MrAnibl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That was the story of Steve Austin & the six million dollar man -> The tv series!

  • @canzer3434
    @canzer3434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    love how he is getting so much facts in there and he almost flies the thing into his head at 15:29

  • @dagann1
    @dagann1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It is hard to believe how advanced we've become since the day at Kittyhawk. I worked in military aviation back in the day and saw the Navy Tomcat through the f-18 Fighter. However, once in that world, one can't escape the notions of military aircraft of the present and to the future. I have a lot of respect for the various contractors such as Grumman, Lockheed, Pratt & Whitey, etc., and the results of Skunkworks, yet, I also share the same respect for the Russians too. In fact, I've often noticed some "experts" we find on the net appear to be too loyal to our accomplishments and are quite vocal with their opinions that only the West is capable to designing and producing mind-blowing technology to rule the skies. The Su-37's thrust vectoring capabilities and the use of canards along with the speed of the aircraft may be the ultimate answer our designers dread and keep the lights on all night at the White House. However, only time will answer the plethora of questions involved. Bur, these videos that illustrate the virtues of the Su-37, just in maneuvering capabilities alone, is enough for me to question our capabilities to counter the threat associated with this aircraft.
    Due to the fact I left the military years ago, I may not have enough information that only hands-on experience can explain. Yet, I know there are many veterans out there that do. Therefore, I wish this to be only a moment to learn and not debate with angry super-hero type patriots drunk on ignorance of recent recipes of Kool=Aid. One question alone is worthy to discuss and that is: "has American aircraft manufacturers reached that level of maneuvering and agility talent and possibly achieved better?" Or, "does the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 meet and or exceeds such capabilities or are we banking on better avionics and weapon systems with the aid of stealth to prevail? I think these are questions that are fair after watching t6he Su-37. I assume our aircraft share if not exceed what I witnessed, but I need verification. However, I'm amazed by their recent achievements and it was a pleasure to watch it. Also, don't assume I won't seek and or research this myself. In fact, I will be looking for videos of our aircraft doing the same feats. But, again, I'm thrilled by the recent technology and I often wonder if we will, in time, be able to do everything we can imagine.

    • @citizenblue
      @citizenblue 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% agree

    • @Тешуков
      @Тешуков ปีที่แล้ว

      Дружище, твой родной запад только и делает, что ворует чужие технологии, даже джинсы не ваша разработка. О чем говорить - без России мозгов не хватается с ракетным двигателем справится и с атомными станциями. Твоя страна - сарача и спикулянты, к сожалению

    • @stephenhurd1489
      @stephenhurd1489 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a very human thing to say. We're so advanced we can make a tiny thing fly instead of a big thing. Lmao

  • @edcox1630
    @edcox1630 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Back in the 90's when i lived in an apartment and only had basic Cable, 'Extreme Machines' was my absolute favorite show!.......along with Beyond 2000/Beyond Tomorrow. Boy i miss those days, wish i could go back.

    • @jelordbustillo7987
      @jelordbustillo7987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. I'm ok

    • @worldmenot5171
      @worldmenot5171 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mine too beyond tomorrow rings some bells love tech love flight I would jump out a plane like this onto Michael Jacksons long lost top-secret Unicorn I will make Robots to replace my f'd up siblings & I will be bionic before I die like Steve Austin million dollar man .

    • @alienautopsy9326
      @alienautopsy9326 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Beyond 2000 was our favorite show when we got cable. Late 80’s/90’s American TV production and aesthetics were awesome.

  • @mikhailhunter5277
    @mikhailhunter5277 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    "Commander, there seems to be a small bird traveling at mach 2, should we ignore it?"

    • @raymondj8768
      @raymondj8768 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      i was thinking the same thing bro hahaha

    • @joshjarrett8896
      @joshjarrett8896 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      But do birds show up on radar like one single bird because I think flocks of birds do

    • @iandavismadeinengland5881
      @iandavismadeinengland5881 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let follow it ,. It might know something we dont

    • @thomaskallmyr
      @thomaskallmyr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      When we 1971 saw that UFO it was Golden Glowing 333meters diameter,in the Floating of over the sea level. on radio it sounded like a Giant Organ delivering several frequences at a time,thus the Gravitational field had a Spectrum that have to be "Overrided" with these frequences of High Electric and Supraconducting together with plasmaholding Two or more Pheriphixal Rings Close to the Outer Radious of the Vehicle. The Wessel is constructed Layer - by - Layer,much like the Future Intergrated I.G.B.T.-Transistors.................120 degrees of three Propulsion Watercondensing....www.youtube.com....or Malaysia UFO giant in the Night....as seen by the " UFO in Italy"-the 53 seconds long TRUE non digital made up-Analog UFO..........in the year of 2003....................in North-East Italy over a River...beetween TWO bridges. An American UFO. It is a TIME-Machine so there need not be so much Food aboard.

    • @samtotman7278
      @samtotman7278 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol. That's awesome.

  • @bonyfoxschannel
    @bonyfoxschannel 6 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    12:05 i honestly thought he's gonna say: *"and the only way to eliminate human error is to eliminate ALL HUMANS!"* too much sci-fi heh..

    • @curtcoller3632
      @curtcoller3632 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      AI is the best way to get there my friend!

  • @scottprendergast2680
    @scottprendergast2680 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    22:05 this was part of Ronald Reagans star wars defense program- I remember this when it was unclassified 10 years later in '96-7

  • @FirstLast-zv5od
    @FirstLast-zv5od 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    When I was a kid I remember watching about the YF-22. I was so excited about it. The F-22 is so advanced but due to the cost of the aircraft (maintenance/flight hours/production/parts...the whole shebang) America won't mass produce what I believe is the most advanced fighter in the world. Instead we get the F-35, which focuses technological supremacy vs performance supremacy. But still, the F-22 is the bad bitch.

    • @FirstLast-zv5od
      @FirstLast-zv5od 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Megan Cummings no kidding? That seems like a huge waste. Something our government would certainly do.

  • @joshcharles5402
    @joshcharles5402 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Colleageus of mine used drones they bought from home into the theatre of war as they were not issued them by their own military. One unit had about 6 drones which engineers upgraded ingeniously. Also casualties were minimal as every partol had a couple of drones searching the battle field spotting the enemy and vectoring the troops to intercept them and airstrikes. Brilliant things

    • @arielhermoso4262
      @arielhermoso4262 ปีที่แล้ว

      Josh Charles: Well said!...Once youre drafted in the military, immediately be. friend your unit Comndng. Officer (C.O.) about the used of "modern gadgets" available now in the on. line bussiness market!.. Thru "contribution system" among the level of: platoon group (30 + soldrs.), company unit (100 + soldrs), battalion unit (500 + soldrs), etc. - quick "fund raising" action can be done, so any appropriate gadgets- can be purchased right away...Always do an improvement/ modification works on the purchased gadgets- to foiled any monitoring system, secretly unstalled by the manufacturer.. Dont forget to install a built. in explosives to your gadget, manually & auto activated option- to destroy your own gadget, once a crash incident was imminent.. Thus, sensitive info willnt fall into wrong hands.. Also, to cancell the possibility of the enemy re. cycling acts, using your OWN GADGET against you!...

  • @rajat9619
    @rajat9619 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Xtreme Machines, 1 of my favorite documentaries. I think this is from 1990s telecasted on Discovery Channel's Wings program. I was in school then & so fascinated by these programs. Now we need a good documentary on 6th gen jets.

  • @daemonshadowcaust7620
    @daemonshadowcaust7620 8 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    no way! I watched this almost 20 years ago, when south africa first got satellite connection! Where are those inventions today?

    • @WaterWhiteTuber
      @WaterWhiteTuber 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Correct. ...watch the credits at the end of the video. It says copyright TLC 1998

    • @wrenchaholic
      @wrenchaholic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bad71hd fact.

    • @jackasshomey
      @jackasshomey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @vctjkhme yep that moment the US wastes several hundreds of millions on building jets because they thought russia had 10's of thousands when in reality they just looped the same footage of 15 jets flying by 50 times and let the US watch their "War Propaganda" proof that if you make yourself look better then the US they get a crotchity about it and try to beat whatever you do like the insecure american's they are lol peace through superior firepower right?

    • @baasbassinnababylonrobert-9963
      @baasbassinnababylonrobert-9963 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HIDDEN brother,they are hidden for us,the people....
      These scumbag murderers only need us to PAY for the shit.

    • @larethhuff5385
      @larethhuff5385 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @this worlds on fire Dude this is no where near black budget....

  • @pauliether.c.guy.3349
    @pauliether.c.guy.3349 9 ปีที่แล้ว +125

    Wow I remember this show from back in the day. Extreme Machines 1997 was the year and holy shit I loved this show I watched It religiously. It was on the TLC channel which Plays nothing but garbage today. TLC had alot of good shows back then.

    • @amaitilasso
      @amaitilasso 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I am in complete agreement. I am so old I remember when MTV had music, the history channel wasn't the lame reality show channel, they actually had science shows on the science channel not just clips from youtube. I remember the day I got the science package. History Ch., History II, History International, Science Ch, TLC, and I think a couple more too.

    • @sonicjet7759
      @sonicjet7759 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@amaitilasso I remember the Science Channel, TLC The Learning Channel, History Channel, H20 , Discovery Channel :) it was really good watching and learning about the world on television.

    • @chrishickman6403
      @chrishickman6403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You remember junk yard wars?

    • @briancarter3704
      @briancarter3704 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sonicjet7759 it was fine until they got over friendly with the gay programming, like shopping cart challenge and crap like that

    • @nikofox1275
      @nikofox1275 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      amaitilasso lll

  • @charrua007
    @charrua007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The real breakthrough that will make the difference and will make flying indefinitely safer is antigravitational technology. As long as flying is based on aerodynamics the forces keeping aircrafts in the air will need to keep a very delicate balance and disaster will occur when that balance is broken

  • @jozzerful2
    @jozzerful2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    33:02 in the video the design of that size carrying up to 1000 passengers, will never come to be because as it is today, some airplanes have to make a flight with empty seats which is not good for business can you imagine having to fill
    1000 seats, were you mite see something like this is, if in the future people are not allowed pick and choose when they want to go here and there at a moment's notice for pollution reasons if the airport , said there will be two flights today, leaving at A and maybe one at B , and then you might get a thousand people being at the airport an hour or two in advance and have one or maybe two huge flight quantity of people permitting instead of loads of small ones with planes that are not even completely full at times? Something along them lines is the only way that would work today.

  • @paulhaynes8045
    @paulhaynes8045 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Made in 1998 - the Sukhoi Su-37 it gets so orgasmic about was a single prototype that crashed in 2002. The consensus was that, although it was hyper-manouverable, in reality it wouldn't do well in dog-fights. No further versions were built or flown.

  • @kevangunn7163
    @kevangunn7163 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    It's amazing how far we could go, and how much better off we all would be, if we all just got along

    • @maddpeanut6313
      @maddpeanut6313 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You do realize that most of the advancements made throughout history were in response to military requirements.

    • @heavymeddle28
      @heavymeddle28 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes I agree with you that violence is bad and that we have no other choice but to nuke our enemies

  • @jasongooden917
    @jasongooden917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    2014: In the near future strange craft will zoom across the skies.
    2020: Drones fly by with loud speaker screaming stay at home.

    • @bhaskartripathi
      @bhaskartripathi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are talking about Bionic UAVs. Drones are basic UAVs (non-bionic). The puzzle is still being solved.

    • @crazyginger1882
      @crazyginger1882 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      By chance has anyone seen these tear drop shaped drones,about a foot long no propelers move very stealth like a hummingbird,any info ,appreaciated.some stay stationary some go back and forth.Mirrow like panels ,white or red light at bottom.mirror.thanks

  • @TheHallucinati
    @TheHallucinati 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Inaccurate. Leaked Concorde plans had no impact on TU-144 design according to encyclopaedic data (Wiki). TU 144 had a different engine and wing configuration than Concord despite the two planes looking similar from afar. Furthermore - there was nothing "faulty" about TU 144. It's main problem was the short distance it was able to travel. Soviets had to improve the design to match Concorde's distance, and they did. Why the TU-144 crashed at Le Bourge is not clear to this day. Some sources suggest the pilots turned on a new untested fly-by-wire system (which had to remain in non-operational mode during all flights). The last words of the pilot as the delegation entered the plane's cockpit were: "if we're going to die at least we die together", suggesting he knew of some danger factor that he chose to conceal. Another possible factor is that seconds before the crash the pilot may have been startled by the French Mirage plane. The French were interested in TU-144 winglets, Mirage's pilot's assignment was to film the winglets unfolding up close.

  • @gswovoka744
    @gswovoka744 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @around 23:30 - No mention of the m2f2 pilot seeing a helicopter which he thought too close and in trying to correct is when the craft started it's wild roll. I worked at the Northrop "Advanced Lifting Re-entry Group at the time as a programmer.

  • @lockheedx33
    @lockheedx33 ปีที่แล้ว

    49:10 What is the name of the music that starts here and extends until the end of the video?

  • @mariuszfidzinski7474
    @mariuszfidzinski7474 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    21:11 - as long as it carries some sort of transmitters - it will be "visible" - and there's no need to shoot it down as long, as you have your slippers on your feet (and in your hand) ;-)
    if we're talking 'bout "spying" into other spaces - buildings, areas of concentration etc - we need to talk about just near light freqs, nothing material...

  • @DaveDablave
    @DaveDablave 9 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    "Some day you"ll be able to hop in your laser ship and in 10 seconds you are at escape velocity. "
    Then days later the cleaning crew will finish removing your splattered corpses from the back wall. Ignoring air friction, Thats 116 times the force of gravity.

    • @quantumleap359
      @quantumleap359 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Dave LeBlanc Yup, the crew will have a nasty job, as the passengers will be smeared into jelly. Dreams, but dreamers without knowledge of the laws of physics!

    • @brandoncruise6398
      @brandoncruise6398 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Splat! It does seem dangerous to fly people in that sort of contraption. How stable would the laser light be after constant use? The basic idea and technology itself have the potential for certain other commercial and industrial uses, just not commercial flight. Construction crews and toy makers I'm sure would love something like this.

    • @50kT
      @50kT 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +Quantum Leap They wouldn't splat if instead of pushing the craft at high speeds from the back, the craft fell toward an gravity well generated in the direction of travel. Then the passengers and the craft would all be moving at the same rate. To slow down or stop movement, you would just modulate the position of the gravity well in relation to the craft.

    • @SKOALO1
      @SKOALO1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Dave LeBlanc kittke only my wiener can withstand those forces

    • @wafikiri_
      @wafikiri_ 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +50kT Damn! And I thought I was the only one with this idea!
      In fact, my idea dates from long ago, when I learned of black holes .... and imagined a somehow directionable black hole pulling a spaceship behind at quasiluminic speeds. But oh well ....

  • @MrSpikebender
    @MrSpikebender 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Five years work and four million dollars" I can build you a 90 mph 250 class quad copter from scratch with GPS and FPV in one afternoon for under $100.

  • @Bearak_
    @Bearak_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Su-37 - (which was actually just a technology demonstrator, of which only one was ever built and that one crashed - we'll ignore this for now) does summersaults in the air. Narrator: "...the MASTER of the skies".
    F-22 - which the Suhkoi can't see, fires an AMRAAM from 12 miles. No more Su-37.

  • @allandavis8201
    @allandavis8201 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In such a short period of time we have gone from biplanes built from wood,fabric, and cables to aircraft built with composite materials, thrust vectoring and fly-by light controls, all of which had to be imagined and brought to reality, and things that can be imagined now will soon become reality, we are literally at the point where if you can imagine it you can build it.

    • @randomthings8247
      @randomthings8247 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We imagined flying cars over 50 years ago. Never happened and never will.

    • @michaelp.5222
      @michaelp.5222 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randomthings8247 There already exists flying cars though, they are just not efficient to use.

    • @randomthings8247
      @randomthings8247 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelp.5222 They are NOT flying cars. They are a supersized version of a flying TOY, four rotors, dependent on 6 axis gyros and a computer chip.
      That's like saying that a CAR is equivalent to a horse drawn CART. Just fully refined. Let's put a horse drawn CART in the LA freeway and see how that works out.
      No, it'll have to be a revolution in transport. Like anti-gravity, vectored by an AI brain connect to your spine to keep things safe.
      BTW, here's a guy who used to be my hero.
      Not so much anymore.
      th-cam.com/channels/gKWj1pn3_7hRSFIypunYog.html

    • @TheFreshSpam
      @TheFreshSpam 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randomthings8247 the technology exists to make leviatatong cars that are autonomous and self controlling. If everyone out their heads to it, we could get it done in good time. Fiction isnt far from reality. The thing that stops these crazy ideas is that they are crazy and impractical to do. The real world has to be way kire efficient and ruthless to ideas that are untested and not gauged

  • @livingood1049
    @livingood1049 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I really like this design and these guys are cool AF, just really sucks that reactionless propulsion is still being suppressed, these guys look cool enough to probably feel a similar way about this, especially if they knew just how close it was to being a reality just being intentionally kept under wraps.. 😔

  • @jmmahony
    @jmmahony 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The most inaccurate prediction was at 50:08, where the laser propelled craft zooms past a guy in a car reading- a map. What? no mapping app on a gps-enabled smartphone?

  • @Stevenisbelieven
    @Stevenisbelieven 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    When they were talking about pilots being the issue, I thought they were going to talk about drones. This show is so old they werent even talking about remote piloting or drones.

    • @DudleyaSetchellii
      @DudleyaSetchellii 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      StevieMac! Yet...the future we haven't seen except for vtol.

    • @tonybrooks8677
      @tonybrooks8677 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      But we got Steve Austin !

    • @seedplanter7173
      @seedplanter7173 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We live under their (government) control they like us dumb and gullible.

    • @mrterrywatkins
      @mrterrywatkins 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me to I was just wondering about drones. This must be old. We probably have 12 year old kids that play video games that are better pilots now days

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonybrooks8677 Steve Austin? I want Aston Martin! Way faster than those Austins.

  • @Nyumbaclassic
    @Nyumbaclassic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    this is amazing, circle shaped aeroplanes>

  • @Trident-91
    @Trident-91 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ellington, you’re spesh 🤩
    Great fun my man

  • @joescoggins5937
    @joescoggins5937 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Where are the flying saucers, now that we've reached 2019? And the dragonflys, and the lifting bodies? We saw a lot of pre-2014 aircraft, but not very many real concepts for the future. I'm not sure we're as smart as we have become accustomed to thinking we are.

    • @particles1101
      @particles1101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gov't are too scared to advance society to type 1 because they all want their vision of utopia to be instead of working together to achieve it.
      But I have to say I'd rather live in a liberal democracy if I had to choose.

    • @particles1101
      @particles1101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @thespACEchannel My point is there should be no "upper hand." It's a bunch of old people playing chess with people's lives instead of taking a step back and looking at the big picture.

    • @particles1101
      @particles1101 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @thespACEchannel Stupid people have been "guiding the herd" for eons now. Mass communication has enabled a pretty good leap in technology and kind of stopping this endless wheel of war and ignorance and imposed death.

  • @armstrongqwerty9331
    @armstrongqwerty9331 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    where you can find information about this unit 21: 32

    • @sanchezmandelbrot6130
      @sanchezmandelbrot6130 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Try the air and space museum in Washington , there may be something there. in a library .

  • @bobsullivan5714
    @bobsullivan5714 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Science fiction author and engineer Jerry Pournelle presented a article about what he termed a Laser Launching System about 40 years ago in a science fiction magazine. I believe the magazine was either Astounding or Amazing. Pournelle's concept was of a cargo/passenger module that was launched on a inclined rail system using a laser to heat water to extreme pressures at the back of the launch module to provide the reaction mass to boost to orbit.
    This is not a new idea.

  • @KirkKvistad
    @KirkKvistad ปีที่แล้ว

    Magnifique moments inoubliables. ✈️ Super l'atterrissage et le décollage 👍😎🛫🛬

  • @chrislee895
    @chrislee895 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    29:05... did anyone see the tiny ufo thing flying from the bottom left of the screen to the top right of the screen .. you can see it pass right infront of the 747 . does anyone know what that is ? Mabey something to do with the film ?

  • @knutdrum430
    @knutdrum430 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    7:08 Can reverse direction instantly. Whats the point of exaggerating everything to the point where you make the documentary a complete joke ?

  • @InnercityHillbilly
    @InnercityHillbilly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I think it's so funny to watch this 21 years later while seeing what the future really has held.

    • @mig4868
      @mig4868 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Memes, streaming and e-girls?? Lol

    • @climatechangedoesntbargain9140
      @climatechangedoesntbargain9140 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      trump

    • @yelsmlaugh
      @yelsmlaugh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Red Flag interstellar war has recently been set for 2030. Each vehicle will be piloted by a human from this planet. Suckers all. They are going to be shooting each other down. We've had artificial gravity (or whatever you want to call it) since the mid 1950s. The Military-Industrial "Black Budgeteers" have control way beyond the idiots we vote for.

    • @InnercityHillbilly
      @InnercityHillbilly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@climatechangedoesntbargain9140- I'll finish that comment for you, "is an idiot that deserves to perish traumatically", there you go buddy

  • @kdmc40
    @kdmc40 9 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This video must be old. Its riddled with technical inaccuracy and incorrect information.

    • @dabcorn
      @dabcorn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Old does not necessarily account for being inaccurate. The statement made at 42:10 has ALWAYS been inaccurate!!!

    • @bad71hd
      @bad71hd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      kdmc40 You are riddled with an accuracy and incorrect information

    • @roro-mm7cc
      @roro-mm7cc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @ninjarawr21 millennials were born 1980s-mid 1990s (ie bbecame an adult/teen in the millennium) so if he was a millennial he would definitely be older than this video. Generation Z is my generation ie the generation after millennials (born between 1995 and early 2000s) and the generation born late 2000s-now is generation alpha ie the children of millenials. millenials are actually middle aged and having kids now.. look it up.

  • @MrBearEverywhere
    @MrBearEverywhere 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there anymore information anywhere on the little drone at 21:20?

  • @fredflintstoner596
    @fredflintstoner596 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !"
    Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ."
    Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!"
    Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window ? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically past?..."
    Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!"
    Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky."
    Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction."
    Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"

  • @Real_MisterSir
    @Real_MisterSir 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "In the future, this video from 2014 may be recommended to people"

    • @kevoutjones5739
      @kevoutjones5739 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's one hell of away to find out that we all need each other Love and Peace to all see on the other side Of Covid/ 19 Keep well and wear your mask and we all can get there soon Kevout xxx

  • @thomasashe2681
    @thomasashe2681 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The laser light cone shaped craft looks like something from the Lost In Space or Buck Rogers shows. Maybe there is a way (depending on the actual mechanics of the device) to build a craft that contains the laser creating device located below the push plate to make it a self contained propulsion unit instead of having the laser creating device ground based.

    • @thomasashe2681
      @thomasashe2681 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      In order to do this it would be great if the laser device was as small and lightweight as a laser pointer or flashlight but powerful enough to propel a craft with a few people and there property (1000 pounds) while using very little power.

    • @stevenmiddleton9237
      @stevenmiddleton9237 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm, now you'll have to find a place for the motor that powers the laser and another place for the fuel to power the motor...

  • @CrazyFunnyCats
    @CrazyFunnyCats 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    39:33
    Cool! 🦖
    This was a great video 👍

  • @OrderRed
    @OrderRed 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very optimistic predictions. Sadly, 22 years later still nothing has come out of it and some things are already canceled.
    39:36
    The T-Rex roar was not made from the simulator sound, I just looked it up. Apparently it was the sound of a baby elephant slowed down. Where did he get this from?

  • @schonsospaet22
    @schonsospaet22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What machine is that in minute 22:00 the speaker does not mention a name.

  • @Scott-tm4gg
    @Scott-tm4gg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is like flipping pages in an old popular science magazine.....in 2019

    • @silverwiskers7371
      @silverwiskers7371 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep, we watched this video from over a decade ago and it's outdated, I'd like 2C an upgraded video from 2020 and compare the advancement into the world of 5G technology moving into aviation and propulsion, this is when and where we'll see the future in full range

  • @jonweiss4223
    @jonweiss4223 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I was never really impressed by the "higher" aspect of flying. If they can get me from Miami to Seattle in under an hour and do it at 100 ft, AGL, I am good with that.

    • @markblanch4178
      @markblanch4178 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Friction

    • @delltawnnorthri7459
      @delltawnnorthri7459 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, you need a vacuum chamber, a material that wont burn up, or go really high up.

    • @jonweiss4223
      @jonweiss4223 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually, there are aircraft in the inventory today that can do it in 2 hrs, and for that trip, I'd be flexible, two hours from Miami to Seattle is OK, and they can do it at sea level. All I need to do is get ahold of an F-15 it can make the trip in 2.03 hours, at 1650 mph.

    • @Skyhawk656
      @Skyhawk656 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Altitude is added safety. More time to glide, more options.

    • @joeg5414
      @joeg5414 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jonweiss4223 Bullshit. F-15 is well under 1000 mph at sea level. It makes no sense to feel safer at lower altitude. Altitude is a pilots best friend when something goes wrong.

  • @immrnoidall
    @immrnoidall 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2+ years later and still no flying saucers shown in the intro.

  • @sgodsellify
    @sgodsellify ปีที่แล้ว

    Those drones like Cypher (12:13) are going to be game changing.

  • @javamanV3
    @javamanV3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What was omitted from mention was that the pilot of the M2F2 was worried about a helicopter chase plane that he felt was too close during landing- the actual crash was caused by the pilot making a radical maneuver to avoid the helicopter, causing the M2 to roll violently and become uncontrollable. I attended a briefing from the pilots of the M2F2 and the HL10 with films of their flight. and worked at Northrop, the company that built these craft. The group I worked in was very involved in Space Shuttle research. In the film makers defense, the helicopter story may not have been general knowledge at that time.

  • @depotmsa2362
    @depotmsa2362 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I remember seeing this on the tv, that guys voice is legendary

  • @ITALJUTE
    @ITALJUTE 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    9:27 Is this because they have the G-spot?

  • @Zt3v3
    @Zt3v3 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Those huge brushed motors on the "tiny" RC planes were hilarious. Same thing with the resolution of the onboard camera....36ppi maybe, lol.

  • @DTechnologyservices
    @DTechnologyservices 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    To create that technology where there is no front windows but cameras you would have to use backup solar panel installations which would guarantee power regardless of what may happen. Those panels would have to be installed surrounding the top of the cockpit.

  • @ntxhuavlis6757
    @ntxhuavlis6757 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope you guys can figure out all the bugs fast so I can see it in my life time. Keep up the good job.

  • @jeffcotton2120
    @jeffcotton2120 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    They need to start with magnetic auto levitation flight enablements so there are no crashes possible, then create from there.

  • @Gary-Seven-and-Isis-in-1968
    @Gary-Seven-and-Isis-in-1968 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Made in 1998... No wonder it all seemed so dated.
    With references to Concord still flying and that guys laptop was as thick as a house brick )))

  • @BIGMANMUSIK
    @BIGMANMUSIK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m watching this in October 2019 and it’s crazy to see how much has changed! 😮😳

  • @brian6175
    @brian6175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:36 Oh wow, this is pretty accurate, what is it? Yeah yeah, keep saying it's old and whatever, does someone knows what it is? Kind of what to dig into it.

    • @SeraphimFelis
      @SeraphimFelis 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like a weird vtol system

  • @kurtbjorn3841
    @kurtbjorn3841 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everyone digs the Ekranoplan, but it was obsolete the day it flew. It wasn't designed to carry Marines, it was supposed to dash out and launch stand-off missiles at aircraft carriers, maybe land targets. In that era, being low = being safe, but look-down radars became common, and being low/fast helped little. It would have been a painfully easy target for an F-14.

  • @juanmelendezrivera6085
    @juanmelendezrivera6085 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Magnificent jet fighter machines. I would prefer the vertical takeoff and landing capability that the old Harrier has combined with supersonic combat maneuvers. Concerning flying saucer/ doughnut design, these aircraft will have better cargo handling use for long flights and landing everywhere without the need of large airports and long landing strips. Aircraft manufacturers have the challenge to bring those flying saucer drones to full sized cargo/passenger aircraft. We can bring the future to reality today. Thanks.

    • @howardstark6707
      @howardstark6707 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of course. Maybe, maybe. Very probably.🤝👍

  • @DavenH
    @DavenH 10 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Was this video made before 2000?

    • @psilocyberspaceman
      @psilocyberspaceman 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes.

    • @Mythxiir
      @Mythxiir 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ***** "We now have the technology" *Grabs apple laptop with the rainbow logo*

    • @joelvanburen2642
      @joelvanburen2642 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Montgomery i was going to say apple is conforming all the same and he loses just for that p.s. get linux

    • @pikkkkaro
      @pikkkkaro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mark Montgomery this is the Cringiest, Overreacted, Funniest and the Best Comment on this Video

    • @FreedomsDmocracy1st
      @FreedomsDmocracy1st 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...on Dec 24, 2014, its right on the beginning.

  • @edlaprade
    @edlaprade 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A couple of mistakes. The flying wing program had pretty much eliminated the stability problems, but was canceled due to politics. Heinkle (sp?) flew the first jet aircraft in late 1938. Whittle didn't even start working on his engine until after the war started.

    • @theharper1
      @theharper1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Whittle started development of a jet engine long before WW2 but couldn't get adequate funding. He patented the idea in 1930. Heinkel had the funding to achieve the first flight in 1939, while the British Gloster jet didn't fly until 1941.

    • @WCM1945
      @WCM1945 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frank Brown
      Does that mean that you are sworn to hate Germans?
      They are no worse than any other population driven to frenzied nationalism. Hate and lust for power are part of the human psyche. as is the opposite, the desire for love and peace among all.

    • @R.U.1.2.
      @R.U.1.2. 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WCM1945 I believe you missed the reason that is germane to the discussion.

  • @johnhause7150
    @johnhause7150 ปีที่แล้ว

    24:16 and you thought the 6 million Dollar man was just at.v show. 😂

  • @mariuszfidzinski7474
    @mariuszfidzinski7474 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    20:30 - well... basic physics tell me, that an extra move of that wing upwards produces a counter-action on the body - downward... so - ok - air pressure etc, but there are also other forces and factors

  • @3174jason
    @3174jason 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The TR-3B space forces,
    space craft. Faster than 9G's vertical and horizontally.

    • @gabrielromero312
      @gabrielromero312 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aurora project exists not for public only military and anti gravity allso and more not for rregular people tho see only luminaty and classify

    • @stanleytanioka7799
      @stanleytanioka7799 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Gabriel Romero wsvhl

  • @urbanplanner7200
    @urbanplanner7200 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Before The Learning Channel turned to "reality" TV

    • @thomaskallmyr
      @thomaskallmyr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      When we 1971 saw that UFO it was Golden Glowing 333meters diameter,in the Floating of over the sea level. on radio it sounded like a Giant Organ delivering several frequences at a time,thus the Gravitational field had a Spectrum that have to be "Overrided" with these frequences of High Electric and Supraconducting together with plasmaholding Two or more Pheriphixal Rings Close to the Outer Radious of the Vehicle. The Wessel is constructed Layer - by - Layer,much like the Future Intergrated I.G.B.T.-Transistors.................120 degrees of three Propulsion Watercondensing....www.youtube.com....or Malaysia UFO giant in the Night....as seen by the " UFO in Italy"-the 53 seconds long TRUE non digital made up-Analog UFO..........in the year of 2003....................in North-East Italy over a River...beetween TWO bridges. An American UFO. It is a TIME-Machine so there need not be so much Food aboard.

    • @jeffreycole9834
      @jeffreycole9834 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Before documentary channels became "scripted" reality TV Channels.

  • @johnnowakowski4062
    @johnnowakowski4062 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Anything the public was allowed to see when this was first aired was already old technology...

    • @bohemoth1
      @bohemoth1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Somewhere in The Holy BIBLE says that THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN.
      When I was in Africa and India I was Given a tour of some caves by The Monks from a Monastary where my mother enrolled me when she was stationed in India at the United States Embassy. In those caves I saw carvings and paintings of OTHER WORLDLY gravity defying crafts or as one would say Spacecrafts. They were firing beams of lightening at earth. These carvings and paintings went back to before Moses.
      In Africa I was taken to a SERIES of underwater caves. Man talk about an mindblowing experience. Those caves had paintings of spaceships and an INVASION FORCE just vaporizing the people of earth. Those paintings were made before the time of Noah.
      Mom and dad were both military doctors and my brothers, sisters and myself traveled with them to their duty stations when permitted. Since our DECENDENTS of our ancestors had contracted my family in South Carolina and told my parents and grandparents an incredible story about they were our family from Africa. Unbelievable! They traced the family from the time that they were taken from Africa by SLAVE SHIPS to Boston and then sold to a family of Russian immigrants who had properties in South Carolina and Alabama and they had tons of money. The Tzar of Russia Alexander was against slavery and ordered that the slave owner free my family. Of course that was impossible because a freed slave was targeted and resold to another Master or killed. That's how I got to go to Africa. In India the Monarchy was up in the Himalayan Mountains. On both continents I had a beautiful experience and I was Given my first dog in India by the Monks which was a Tibetan Masstiff puppy. In Africa I was Given a Rhodesian Ridgeback Puppy. Then dad got assigned to Moscow where I was loved by the Russians. In the caves of Siberia there were paintings and carvings of pre Jesus time of Spaceships and battles between them and the people of earth. At the African University of Timbuktu which the Colonialists are trying to DESTROY, there were manuscripts and paintings with carvings of Interplanetary space battles between earth and beings from another world.
      You know meeting other people from other places is the best way to get an education. Speaking with older people I have learned so much about history things that they don't even teach in schools or Churches.
      So please go and explore the world and more importantly TAKE YOUR CHILDREN WITH YOU. Allow yourself and your children to mingle with the OLDER generation. Ask about their history and the stories that were told to them by their parents and grandparents that were passed down by their ancestors. Ask if the places still exist that they told you about. Go and explore for yourself with your children.
      The most interesting thing that you and your children will learn is that what has been done in the past will be done in their lifetime again. Because truly THERE IS NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN. Don't worry about if people think that you are crazy. Because everyone with knowledge is crazy. No one wants to learn the TRUTH.

    • @bohemoth1
      @bohemoth1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ninjarawr21
      GRAMMAR QUEEN

  • @AInspiree
    @AInspiree ปีที่แล้ว

    The sky will soon be filled with remarkable machines, pushing the boundaries of what we once thought possible. As winged aircraft evolve into a new era, we're on the brink of witnessing revolutionary designs that will redefine air travel. From military marvels to futuristic airliners and groundbreaking propulsion systems, our imaginations are transforming into tangible creations.
    In this captivating story, we learn about the fierce competition that led to the rise of the Lockheed YF-22 as the chosen fighter aircraft. The rivalry between the Northrop YF-23 and the YF-22 was intense, but the latter's superior performance and agility secured its place in history. It became the backbone of the US Air Force, leaving the YF-23 as a solemn reminder of the sacrifices made in the pursuit of progress.
    This video serves as a reminder of our relentless pursuit of innovation, pushing the boundaries of human achievement. The future of aviation holds endless possibilities, and as we witness these advancements, we are inspired to dream big and reach for the skies. Let us embrace this exciting journey into the unknown, where science fiction and reality intertwine to shape a future that surpasses our wildest imaginations. ✈🚀✨

  • @SlackerCast
    @SlackerCast 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sittin in 2021 and all these video footage examples look at least 10 years old, maybe 20. Where is all this tech now? Any chance for an update on this?

  • @duanejessup3708
    @duanejessup3708 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    TR3B and the Astra have been flying for some years now. This was just a small glimpse of what we already have and been having.

    • @Voschane
      @Voschane 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      proof?

  • @josejuliopl2140
    @josejuliopl2140 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    It seems to be that there will not be any fighter pilot in the future.

    • @FreedomsDmocracy1st
      @FreedomsDmocracy1st 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ...how correct you are.

    • @xhuynh23
      @xhuynh23 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not for a while....UAV today are still control by fixed location pilot...

    • @citizenblue
      @citizenblue 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I hate to say it, but I agree.

  • @iancanty9875
    @iancanty9875 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The swordsman in Raiders of the Lost Ark was master of the situation, showing off his moves until Indiana Jones simply, & very casually, shot him from a distance. It is easy to imagine a similar situation. A Sukhoi showing off it’s dogfighting moves while a Lockheed Martin F-35 casually launches a long range air to air missile from afar! Need I say more!

  • @Isawwhatyoudid
    @Isawwhatyoudid 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Considering how old this is I bet many assumed that the aircraft featured here would surely be around by 2021.

  • @theeverythingelectronicsst3897
    @theeverythingelectronicsst3897 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I came up with a catapult concept that launches a solar electric plane into the stratosphere, Then solar powered electric motors take over pushing the plane to it's destination, where it lands like a normal plane, After passengers or cargo has been unloaded, the plane is driven up a track back onto the Catapult launcher. The plane has a special cabin and dampening system to reduce the effects of the Catapult .

  • @sharms888
    @sharms888 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    These engineers & scientists spent millions of dollars in R&D constructing Drones, they should have just gone to Toys R Us !!!!

  • @falkenlaser
    @falkenlaser 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Holy shit I remember seeing this on Discovery Wings back in 2001 when I was in the 6th grade, and it was like my favorite show. It’s funny how like the F-22 is the only thing shown here that came to fruition. Everything else shown has been canceled or is vaporware.

  • @MsJinkerson
    @MsJinkerson 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    why fight to see who is the best we should work together or we won't ever be the best

  • @DavidRLentz
    @DavidRLentz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Several points (My taking notes; this is my sole means to do anything akin to work. I should be typing my novels and essays on a serviceable PC. Ask me why.)
    The Northrop Grumman YF-23 Grey Ghost (?) USAF Stealth Fighter prototype is not as dead as some maintain.
    Women pilots can withstand higher G-forces during high-speed, high- manoeuvre flight.
    Would including vernier jets (electric plasma?) At the wingtips and nose, to augment thrust vectoring of the engines truly improve manoeuvring during air-to-air combat?
    I propose a third engine above the two in most fighters, this new one designed for far greater thrust, ideally hypersonic.
    How does one correctly spell "Taryelka"?
    At 35:35, NASA is researching HSCT, a new Mach 2+ passenger transport. The long, sharply pointed nose requires a cockpit without a forward- looking windscreen. It will require a revolutionary, new design of jet engine
    At 44:35, a highly polished conical airframe uses laser propulsion: it rides a square-shaped laser beam.

  • @davidsapir3764
    @davidsapir3764 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is a great watch. Still can't believe the YF 23 lost, it's the most amazing looking fighter I've ever seen. Really bothers me to see years of blood, sweat and tears just rotting in a junkyard, it deserved so much better than that.

    • @inyoface5456
      @inyoface5456 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only su37 prototype crashed some years back. Also a great loss.

  • @Jman21UK
    @Jman21UK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    -sees guy flying to the moon
    'oh hey look it's frank'
    😂😂😂😂

  • @nemo-79000
    @nemo-79000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I remember this program when it first aired twenty three years ago. It shows the power that designers, marketeers and spin doctors have in 'showing the future'. None of these projects have matured and most have been cancelled in the intervening years. One day these people will get in touch with reality. In the mean time, If you want to know what the future holds, just ask an engineer instead of a scientist, you will get a non committal answer but it will be honest and will most likely come to pass.

    • @9HighFlyer9
      @9HighFlyer9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't know, the F-22 has matured pretty nicely.

    • @Davidsavage8008
      @Davidsavage8008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🎉by 1995 I was working for Lockheed when they were going broke bidding on the f22 and was stopped from buying Northrop Grumman. They wanted 2 birds .

  • @hydrorecords
    @hydrorecords 10 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    the Future being 1982?

  • @9HighFlyer9
    @9HighFlyer9 ปีที่แล้ว

    28:06 that's the KM "Caspian Sea Monster" powered by 10 jet engines. Eight in the front and two mounted on the tail.

  • @adelaluz
    @adelaluz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What would be fascinating would be a plane capable of moving through the air like a simple bird with flexible dynamic wings, powered by the movement of its own wings against the wind, rather then by trust of an helix or a turbine, that would be a very good field of development for the Artificial Intelligence to be applied on, rather than bringing an automaton to comptience intelligent live, I say that because I see birds fly an their performance in the sky is impressive I have always imagined this kind of maneuverability in a fighter plane

  • @josmo1363
    @josmo1363 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    13:05 Am I the only one that thinks this thing looks like an Imperial Probe Droid from The Empire Strikes Back?

    • @aurorapaisley7453
      @aurorapaisley7453 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes

    • @randymarsh3432
      @randymarsh3432 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      or bot from space camp with flight upgrade.

    • @thomaskallmyr
      @thomaskallmyr 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      When we 1971 saw that UFO it was Golden Glowing 333meters diameter,in the Floating of over the sea level. on radio it sounded like a Giant Organ delivering several frequences at a time,thus the Gravitational field had a Spectrum that have to be "Overrided" with these frequences of High Electric and Supraconducting together with plasmaholding Two or more Pheriphixal Rings Close to the Outer Radious of the Vehicle. The Wessel is constructed Layer - by - Layer,much like the Future Intergrated I.G.B.T.-Transistors.................120 degrees of three Propulsion Watercondensing....www.youtube.com....or Malaysia UFO giant in the Night....as seen by the " UFO in Italy"-the 53 seconds long TRUE non digital made up-Analog UFO..........in the year of 2003....................in North-East Italy over a River...beetween TWO bridges. An American UFO. It is a TIME-Machine so there need not be so much Food aboard.

    • @williamhunt7649
      @williamhunt7649 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@randymarsh3432 i

    • @db1841927
      @db1841927 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Randy Marsh 7

  • @pharrohku5922
    @pharrohku5922 10 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Good video but is VERY outdated though

    • @bad71hd
      @bad71hd 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pharroh Ku It’s meant as a historical document and informational video dummy

    • @atactician9130
      @atactician9130 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pharroh Ku - You’re out of date! Bitch.

  • @fenderstratguy
    @fenderstratguy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This narrator sounds like the Peter Thomas, who narrated the Forensics Files.

    • @jamesware5100
      @jamesware5100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah ..pretty dramatic

  • @skyrocket0113
    @skyrocket0113 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about flying saucers working off the ether & utilising anti-grav propulsion? That really would be the holy grail of all forms of future travel!👍🛸🍺🍻😷😁👍

  • @moonshade99
    @moonshade99 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the aircraft at 22:40

  • @mikem2949
    @mikem2949 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This video is old as dirt lol. I recorded this on VHS when I was a teenager! It's still awesome though :)

    • @tenzinsangpo2221
      @tenzinsangpo2221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That means you're still a baby, this video is not so ancient..

    • @mikem2949
      @mikem2949 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tenzinsangpo2221 Lol, well let's just say it's old enough for a 38 year old.

  • @citizenblue
    @citizenblue 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    31:42 future technology brought to you by Windows 95

  • @TheRoadDawg
    @TheRoadDawg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is more of a “aircraft of the future” from the 60’s thru the 90’s. Many of these designs have long been obsolete.

  • @speculativeauthor
    @speculativeauthor 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So... if a 40 lb gyroscope is spinning on the end of a pole at high revolution and it can easily be lifted, then why can't a saucer with many gyroscopes spinning around the circumference be easily pushed into the air? Just curious.

  • @sburton982
    @sburton982 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    @23:45 in the words of col.Steve Austin, "I can't control her...she's breaking up! She's breaking up!!"😵😵😵😵😵