As a civil trial lawyer, where the stakes are lower and the cases never get covered by the media, I can tell you how stressful even a five-day jury trial is. For her to go through months of this high pressure trial must have been hell
@@calicodnikonian2774 So? She had suffered so much during that time period, from losing the trail to being called all sorts of names by the media and the public. Might as well get something good out of it.
@@paullooper1090 I don’t blame her one bit I’d do the same thing if I everyone in the country all of a sudden knew who I was. she got all that free publicity and used that to make millions.
Incredible woman. I admire her for standing tall as a woman in a room full of men, and for being taunted and teased whilst her private life fell apart, as well as always standing by her case to try and convict a clearly guilty man!
Horrible and opportunistic woman. Any witness that didnt fit her narrative was turned into a hostile witness. Her conduct was so bad cross examining witnesses Judge Ito told her to stop.
There's a video here on TH-cam, entitled, "My Brother, the Serial Killer." SEE IT to the end and let us know what you think of the O.J. verdict. O.J. S a schmuck and opportunistic basTURD... but look up his bio and dig for information on his father... a full-blown cross-dressing homosexual with another man posing as his husband until he died. Don't believe me? Research it.
They did. She talks about it on another show, they brought a new pair of identical gloves, not frozen, no latex and got experts to explain why the ones he tried on were shrunken. And they did fit this time, but at that point nobody cared anymore and the media had already gotten the story they wanted.
Yes, me too. Why didn’t the Prosecution put an expert on to testify that the gloves made of leather shrink when exposed to moisture. I thought everyone knew this!
Really tho? What about the cop that had the Unsealed vile with O.J’s blood then all of the sudden there is blood on the gate that was not spotted before? And also people like to skip over the fact that mark Furman is on the tapes saying he hates interracial couples and he also had been to OJs house on a domestic violence call from Nicole and was then told to leave by NICOLE with no charges filed and also when Mark was at the house oj was holding a baseball bat that he furman had to basically threaten oj with his baton to get him to put the bat down. That was all the jury needed to know, that is reasonable doubt. Skipping over the tapes as most do is idiotic they provide reasonable doubt because Furman found the blood on the bronco without telling anyone that he was going down the street and also he found the glove while he was alone. I think oj is a stone cold killer that didn’t even cry for his wife. But that my friend especially to a mostly Black jury is reasonable doubt.
The only thing the prosecution proved is what everyone already knew. OJ was Nicole's ex husband. This lady has no honor what so ever. Phone records some what prove when someone was alive. The state has sealed Nicole's, Ron's and Nicole's Mother's phone records. Why???? Not to help OJ.
The glove wasn't as much of a factor as racism. When they caught Mark Furman in those lies and showed the jury, which was majority black, the type of lead detective the prosecution had. That was the dagger through the heart for the prosecution.
Legend has it that OJ was nominated for an Oscar after the trial........ You see, to me, OJ is like a mystery shopper; you recognise them a mile away, you know their "guilty" demeanour, & you just go along with the script......... & when you bust him(expose him), he hops in his car & makes a break for it, just to give himself time to contemplate his next move/line....... All I can say is that if I'm innocent, I'M A STAND MY GROUND & DISPEL ALL ACCUSATIONS!!!! The 1st sign of guilt where you can't face up to your actions, is to RUN..... That's the 1st thing OJ did....... RUN BECAUSE YOU'RE GUILTY AS SIN.
Would anyone's glove fit over latex gloves? It seemed Shapiro tried them on WITHOUT latex gloves. Was the latex to prevent DNA transfer, then why did Shapiro NOT use latex? a
It was not Shapiro who was on trial... had OJ not used latex gloves, he would have transferred DNA, and the prosecution might've tried to retest the gloves... Marcia was a 3rd rate attorney and was given the no-win trial other attorneys refused to take... she jumped at the opportunity to try the case for the publicity... and she's been milking the OJ case for decades on speaking tours and book deals... and getting publicity to this day on T%V talk shows. What else does she have? Oh, yeah, an old law degree... like many lesser known attorneys.
Yes... The latex glove doesn't increase your hand size by more than a fraction of a milimeter... It's much more likely the gloves had shrunk from the blood on them.
I’ve always loved Marcia Clark. I have her book ‘Without A Doubt’ and it’s excellent! She looks great these days and has a great crime show that I watch on TH-cam. I love it it’s really good.
@@christinab9808 Really, now? You REALLY believe that? Well, never mind. Uhhhh... have you seen the video here on TH-cam entitled "My Brother, The Serial Killer"? IF NOT, see it to the very end... you might be surprised. It's by a woman who was not a part of the OJ Simpson Trial and had nothing to gain by it.
I'll believe OJ Simpson is guilty. If you can explain to me how OJ's blood got to the crime scene at Bundy. Even though video evidence shows OJ's blood wasn't there until several weeks after the crime was committed.
I always thought a smarter move would have been to buy the identical gloves to what was found and have OJ try on those new gloves. To try on blood soaked and dried up leather gloves was a really bad move especially since OJ had to put latex gloves first and then
Marcia Clark said in a different interview that they did exactly that, and that the gloves did fit his hands. I don't know if this was done in front of the cameras or in the judges chambers.
IF that's what you believe, then I DARE you to see the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer," and then come back and tell me what you think. How's that? Sound fair to you?
that trial was lost on the jury selection, and Johnny Cochran knew exactly what to do, don't make any mistake about it Johnny Cochran won that trial nobody else, he was brilliant.
Regret taking the trial? Marcia got a 4.5 million book deal during the trial immediately never had to work again & was regularly hired for speaking engagements as TV analyst became rich & famous & had an actress play her 25 years later in a hugely popular series where a whole new audience discovered her plus she's thought of as this hero for women . No Larry she doesn't regret taking the case at all
Latex gloves don’t make a difference in your hand size lol. This is just incompetence from the Prosecution. Everyone that practices law watches that trial so that they know to NOT make the same mistakes these Lawyers did.
Oj could have been convicted the criminalist missed a blood drop on the back of Nicole’s back when she was laying on the sidewalk after oj killed ron he cut his finger as he was stepping over Nicole his blood dropped into her upper back
IF that's what you believe, then I DARE you to see the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer," and then come back and tell me what you think. How's that? Sound fair to you? That blood drop was most likely examined and found not to belong to OJ, so it was never mentioned, it might've proven OJ's innocence... and I never liked OJ; I still think he's an arrogant used scumbag.
Ever seen a person sentenced to prison on a double jeopardy conviction?? From a retrial of the same crime? I have!!! Maybe that will happen to OJ!!! And there will be competent Attorneys handling the prosecution!!!
Could have, should have, the ifs, ands, etc...she did her best. Many peoples lives changed after the trial. Books, TMZ, Keeping up with the Kardashians, TV movies, interviews, etc....2 people died, it was devistating then, and devistating now. Families were broken, lives changed, children involved. Sad
I knew he was guilty since the bronco spectacle but knew he would never get convicted. It was scary. More riots. More people killed if he was found guilty. It was a pressure cooker.
I think the prosecution messed up. They have the upper hand and have all the facts in their favor. I would like to know how much support did Gil give the team for this case. OJ had the best lawyers even pr consultants and crisis managers. OJ’s team played entertainment while the prosecution stuck with the legalese. Guess what, the jury liked the former more.
No matter how you slice the pie. Or whatever you call it. OJ's defense team played to win. If anyone was in the same place as OJ Simpson. They wouldn't complain about how their lawyers won the case. If the lawyers played entertainment to win. Oh well.
She doesn't believe that; she's still milking that trial for decades... what else would she say? See the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer."
@@calicodnikonian2774 everybody involved in the trial that were against OJ Simpson are still, until this day, getting rich off of OJ. Since they feel so strong that he committed those crimes. Why not just give free interviews. Or donate all revenue from the book sales to a charity. From the Goldmans, to the prosecution, to the LAPD. OJ Simpson is their cash cow. And they know it.
@Kensington Drake: Race and planting evidence are realities, but were not material to this case, where they were used by the defense as a side-show, a distraction.
I’m so tired of that bull crap logic, of him acting out whether the glove fit or not. You can’t fake that. Stick to the the shrinkage and arthritis logic. Stop it with the acting logic. It’s not a good argument at all. It’s terrible for anyone to make it. Even worse for a decorated attorney like Marcia Clark to make it. Knock it off.
A competent prosecutor would've had a team of investigators search out where the glove was bought and by whom, in an effort to prove the argument. IT PROBABLY was and the findings hidden away by the prosecution. It's called Due Diligence but in this case, it's called unfair and unlawful practices since defense attorneys are afforded the right BY LAW and jurisprudence to see and know what the evidence is against the suspect.
But she's been milking the OJ Trial for decades, blaming others for her failures on paid lecture tours, book deals and paid TV appearances whenever she has a book out. She was given the no-win trial by other more experienced prosecutors; she was on the bottom of the proverbial totem pole. Darden was chosen to represent blackness, to ward off claims of biases, prejudice and racism. I NEVER liked OJ and his arrogant and wealth which he flaunted everywhere he opened his yap; I STILL think he's an arrogant schmuck's scumbag. But... what else can he be with a father that was a cross-dressing homosexual who lived openly with a "husband," and he later died of AIDS? OJ's characters flaws may well be attributed to the shame he lived with all his life.
No offence but larry king looked so bored. His questions were like they were written down in bullet point form and were not reactive in substance to anything she said.
She imposed limits to the questioning by the host of the program. Common practice. No surprises or "cheap shots" for Marcia's little flat hiney, who's been milking the OJ Trial for decades in paid speaking tours, book sales, paid TV appearances, etc.
dont say anything just accept the truth that you got the wrong simpson. and dont feel sorrry for losing the trial you became a millionaire writing books about oj.
@@Jim.Jim.32 An axiom followed by the better attorneys and prosecutors is to examine evidence AND disprove POSSIBLE arguments by the opposition. She was given a no-win case rejected by other more experienced prosecutors. She was grasping at straws with her Strawman Arguments. Since the OJ Trial, she's been relegated to small cases, just to keep her busy, so she can claim she's "earning" her salary.
They suspected Fuhrman since January and the tapes came out on August. --- He confessed his hatred to black mean who spouse white women. He knew the Simpsons. In '85 as Nicole ran into his arms after she called the cops on OJ for domestic abuse case and Fuhrman was the cop who showed up. ___ Nothing happened that day as no charges were pressed, although ironically he wrote a report in ’89 (four years later), when he wasn't on that case. Why? Because he said the '85 case left him with “insurable impression". Of the 9 calls by Nicole, only Fuhrman wrote a report, a four years late report . This is the man who “found" the gloves. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence! His tape recording were not all played in court. Surprisingly, similar words were uttered and written in request for a “risk pay" pension in early 80s. The defence had a long suspicion about Fuhrman at the start of the trial, the tape were discovered in late August. It just proved every suspicion about him. Not enough!! The sloppy work by the criminalists and the forensic team created many doubts. After OJ gave a blood samples, detective Vannater took the blood vial not to the lab, but to OJ's house, presumably to give it to the criminalists there. Ironically, they can't account for 1.5 millilitres of missing blood. The blood on the sock which the man who took it from the scene Mr. Fung, had EDTA (a blood preservative usually added to blood vials). And Mr. Fung initial note on the sock was that it didn't had any bloods on it. Doubts were all over the place for the jury. The alleged blood stained clothes and the knife was thrown out by OJ at the airport, but he was careless enough to leave a “bloody” sock on his bedroom. Kato Kaelin heard three loud bangs behind his room. The prosecution say OJ hit his head on the AC unit three times (like a loony tunes cartoon). There were no injuries on OJ's head. Ron Goldman had bruised knuckles, he fought for his life, yet no bruises on OJ's body. ⚠️ My point is, the defence created enough doubts, to make conviction on “beyond reasonable doubt" an impossible task
@atletico ATM: You put any criminal case under a high-power microscope, you will find discrepancies, inconsistencies, errors, incompetence, unanswered questions, here and there. The same can be said even for simple traffic accidents. But when you look at those things in the context of this entire case, they don't amount to a hill of beans. Unless, of course you can pair a team of shyster lawyers with a distracted jury who can be easily bamboozled. So many details you've got wrong here, but the time 'twould take to educate you would be wasted on someone seemingly so incapable of reformation.
@@ozten-fj6pe what do her various houses have to do with whether she has had plastic surgery or not. I asked if she had had plastic surgery because she doesn't look anything like she did. We all change as we age obviously but she looks nothing like the same woman that stood in that courtroom.
@@jujuoliver6959 Well it doesn't matter about her homes or $100,000,000 Stock portfolio. She was paid handsomely for her role in the 2nd biggest fictional story since Old Testament. She doesn't like to be recognized nor the Caitlyns.
liecrusher she actually looks better than OJ right now, but guess what... no one cares how OJ looks right now because he is a man, but there is people who cares about the way she looks because she is a woman.
She is an idiot for allowing the glove wearing into evidence Leather shrinks when coming into contact with moisture and going over latex gloves too Bag job
As a civil trial lawyer, where the stakes are lower and the cases never get covered by the media, I can tell you how stressful even a five-day jury trial is. For her to go through months of this high pressure trial must have been hell
But she's milked the O.J. trial for decades on speaking tours, her books, etc.
@@calicodnikonian2774 So? She had suffered so much during that time period, from losing the trail to being called all sorts of names by the media and the public. Might as well get something good out of it.
Who cares? It was her damn job! No Excuses! We all have stress on our jobs. The woman should have been disbarred for gross incompetence. Idiot!
@@calicodnikonian2774 Yeah, earning millions even though her team lost...
@@paullooper1090 I don’t blame her one bit I’d do the same thing if I everyone in the country all of a sudden knew who I was. she got all that free publicity and used that to make millions.
Incredible woman. I admire her for standing tall as a woman in a room full of men, and for being taunted and teased whilst her private life fell apart, as well as always standing by her case to try and convict a clearly guilty man!
she was sleeping with oj's defense attourney and you admire her lol, your as bad as she is
Horrible and opportunistic woman. Any witness that didnt fit her narrative was turned into a hostile witness. Her conduct was so bad cross examining witnesses Judge Ito told her to stop.
Please she and the prosecution totally blew this case by not introducing OJ's confession
I’d comment further but these three before me said it all perfectly....
There's a video here on TH-cam, entitled, "My Brother, the Serial Killer." SEE IT to the end and let us know what you think of the O.J. verdict. O.J. S a schmuck and opportunistic basTURD... but look up his bio and dig for information on his father... a full-blown cross-dressing homosexual with another man posing as his husband until he died. Don't believe me? Research it.
why didn’t the prosecutors argue that the gloves had gotten smaller/shrinked? this had baffled me for the longest time now
“if the gloves don’t fit, you must acquit”
They did. She talks about it on another show, they brought a new pair of identical gloves, not frozen, no latex and got experts to explain why the ones he tried on were shrunken. And they did fit this time, but at that point nobody cared anymore and the media had already gotten the story they wanted.
it was a bad move from the start... they shouldnt have let OJ fit those gloves in the first place...
@@paullooper1090regardless any person with a brain knows he’s guilty
Yes, me too. Why didn’t the Prosecution put an expert on to testify that the gloves made of leather shrink when exposed to moisture. I thought everyone knew this!
just for the record she prove without a shadow of a doubt that he's a killer
Really tho? What about the cop that had the Unsealed vile with O.J’s blood then all of the sudden there is blood on the gate that was not spotted before? And also people like to skip over the fact that mark Furman is on the tapes saying he hates interracial couples and he also had been to OJs house on a domestic violence call from Nicole and was then told to leave by NICOLE with no charges filed and also when Mark was at the house oj was holding a baseball bat that he furman had to basically threaten oj with his baton to get him to put the bat down. That was all the jury needed to know, that is reasonable doubt. Skipping over the tapes as most do is idiotic they provide reasonable doubt because Furman found the blood on the bronco without telling anyone that he was going down the street and also he found the glove while he was alone. I think oj is a stone cold killer that didn’t even cry for his wife. But that my friend especially to a mostly Black jury is reasonable doubt.
Really THO? GOD knows what happened, & you ain't no God...... I'd love to have you on my jury, it'd be a walk in GOD'S heaven!!
not without shadow of doubt though
. Lol . LOL LOL
The only thing the prosecution proved is what everyone already knew. OJ was Nicole's ex husband. This lady has no honor what so ever. Phone records some what prove when someone was alive. The state has sealed Nicole's, Ron's and Nicole's Mother's phone records. Why???? Not to help OJ.
The glove wasn't as much of a factor as racism. When they caught Mark Furman in those lies and showed the jury, which was majority black, the type of lead detective the prosecution had. That was the dagger through the heart for the prosecution.
She took it personal.
of course the gloves fit....he was wearing latex gloves on his hands....
Wisely so, or the prosecution might have re-tested the glove...
That wouldn't make them not fit. And a pool of blood wouldn't have shrunk them. That was 100% prosecutor incompetence.
Latex gloves don’t make a difference. They’re skintight for a reason.
@@FaydsterTV they had shrunk
Legend has it that OJ was nominated for an Oscar after the trial........ You see, to me, OJ is like a mystery shopper; you recognise them a mile away, you know their "guilty" demeanour, & you just go along with the script......... & when you bust him(expose him), he hops in his car & makes a break for it, just to give himself time to contemplate his next move/line....... All I can say is that if I'm innocent, I'M A STAND MY GROUND & DISPEL ALL ACCUSATIONS!!!! The 1st sign of guilt where you can't face up to your actions, is to RUN..... That's the 1st thing OJ did....... RUN BECAUSE YOU'RE GUILTY AS SIN.
Would anyone's glove fit over latex gloves? It seemed Shapiro tried them on WITHOUT latex gloves. Was the latex to prevent DNA transfer, then why did Shapiro NOT use latex?
a
It was not Shapiro who was on trial... had OJ not used latex gloves, he would have transferred DNA, and the prosecution might've tried to retest the gloves... Marcia was a 3rd rate attorney and was given the no-win trial other attorneys refused to take... she jumped at the opportunity to try the case for the publicity... and she's been milking the OJ case for decades on speaking tours and book deals... and getting publicity to this day on T%V talk shows. What else does she have? Oh, yeah, an old law degree... like many lesser known attorneys.
Yes... The latex glove doesn't increase your hand size by more than a fraction of a milimeter... It's much more likely the gloves had shrunk from the blood on them.
@@calicodnikonian2774 the killer used latex gloves underneath
@@calicodnikonian2774 yeah and she got rich with the publicity... going to speak about how she won the case, even though she terribly lost...
leather shrinks when wet...
And he had arthritis and didn't take meds so hands swelled.
@@blueskygal255 : He did take meds for his arthritis. His agent told him not to take the pills when he knew he would be trying on the gloves.
@@elizabethpease947 thx for that correction.
simpson looked down in court when it was revealed that it was Nicole that bought him those gloves.
I’ve always loved Marcia Clark. I have her book ‘Without A Doubt’ and it’s excellent! She looks great these days and has a great crime show that I watch on TH-cam. I love it it’s really good.
And she has been milking the OJ case for decades... books, speaking engagements...
Calico D'Nikonian So has OJ 😉
@@christinab9808 Really, now? You REALLY believe that? Well, never mind. Uhhhh... have you seen the video here on TH-cam entitled "My Brother, The Serial Killer"? IF NOT, see it to the very end... you might be surprised. It's by a woman who was not a part of the OJ Simpson Trial and had nothing to gain by it.
Calico D'Nikonian Are you saying you’ve never seen the plethora of interviews OJ has done from day one? You’re not aware of his book ‘If I Did It’ 🤔🧐
@@christinab9808 I
She is amazing
i dont wanna fight no more
She is a loser
What?!? She was a corrupt prosecutor who used this case to cash in.
Look the whole damn world knows he’s guilty and the ones who think he’s innocent are the one with no common sense
Calico D'Nikonian fine I will do that I’ll let you know when I’m done watching it
"HA SPEAK FOR YOURSELF!!"🙂
@@royknowings58 you must be an idiot then
I'll believe OJ Simpson is guilty. If you can explain to me how OJ's blood got to the crime scene at Bundy. Even though video evidence shows OJ's blood wasn't there until several weeks after the crime was committed.
That absolutely true
She’s incredible!
An incredible liar.
Incredibly corrupt.
A loser who got millions in tours and books... she really cashed in
I always thought a smarter move would have been to buy the identical gloves to what was found and have OJ try on those new gloves. To try on blood soaked and dried up leather gloves was a really bad move especially since OJ had to put latex gloves first and then
Another Monday morning quarterback. I would've done this, I would've done that. What a bunch of baloney!
No, try on the ones at the scene
Marcia Clark said in a different interview that they did exactly that, and that the gloves did fit his hands. I don't know if this was done in front of the cameras or in the judges chambers.
Of course he did it. But the timing of when he did it got him the verdict.
i have this image, of OJ confessing his crime on his death bed
He already did in the book "if" I did it.
Cochran and scheck gave y'all Good whipping not guilty the jurors did not like Marcia and Darden so hostile he was mad every day 😈😈😈😈😈😈
IF that's what you believe, then I DARE you to see the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer," and then come back and tell me what you think. How's that? Sound fair to you?
Oj needs to go on pay per view and spill the beans for$ 49.95
@@GORILLABREATH1 I dont know if anybody would be interested....most already know he's guilty!
OJ should have sent thank you Christmas cards to DARDEN every year after his acquittal.
that trial was lost on the jury selection, and Johnny Cochran knew exactly what to do, don't make any mistake about it Johnny Cochran won that trial nobody else, he was brilliant.
For what does it matter if you gain the world but lose your soul.
Mark Nairn. Well yeah that was part of it. They chose people with a high school diploma or less. Jurors lacked critical thinking ability
He was brilliant at playing the race card.
Yup he got 12 idiots to believe him. He was brilliant alright.
Yes he did Cochran very smart
Regret taking the trial? Marcia got a 4.5 million book deal during the trial immediately never had to work again & was regularly hired for speaking engagements as TV analyst became rich & famous & had an actress play her 25 years later in a hugely popular series where a whole new audience discovered her plus she's thought of as this hero for women . No Larry she doesn't regret taking the case at all
02:00 no authority to enforce the rules.
Marcia looks great. Much better than in the trial.
Latex gloves don’t make a difference in your hand size lol. This is just incompetence from the Prosecution. Everyone that practices law watches that trial so that they know to NOT make the same mistakes these Lawyers did.
They really didn't mess up with the gloves because the defense would have had him put on the gloves if they didn't.
Oj could have been convicted the criminalist missed a blood drop on the back of Nicole’s back when she was laying on the sidewalk after oj killed ron he cut his finger as he was stepping over Nicole his blood dropped into her upper back
IF that's what you believe, then I DARE you to see the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer," and then come back and tell me what you think. How's that? Sound fair to you? That blood drop was most likely examined and found not to belong to OJ, so it was never mentioned, it might've proven OJ's innocence... and I never liked OJ; I still think he's an arrogant used scumbag.
If you think one man committed this crime, you're a fool...OJ may be big, but he's not in the Mossad.
Playing Marcia Clark in this Larry King interview will be her understudy, Laurie Metcalf.
Ever seen a person sentenced to prison on a double jeopardy conviction?? From a retrial of the same crime? I have!!! Maybe that will happen to OJ!!! And there will be competent Attorneys handling the prosecution!!!
O please Marcia you made millions off this case!
She looks so beautiful. My late wife used to say there's your girlfriend when she was about speak during the trial. Marcia you did the best you could.
What case were you watching??? She was a BIG part of the reason the prosecution lost.
Typical comment, when the little head does more of the thinking, than the big head. 😏
Her and Darden fumbled the ball on half their plays. She and Darden caused the verdict.
It's her fault for putting Mark on that stand 😂😂😂😂
Clark and Darden were monumentally incompetent and that is why the killer walked free.
Who cares?
Darden and Clark , Laurel and Hardy ..
If the glove had dried/ Don't let 'em try. It must have shrunk/Don't ya thunk?
Could have, should have, the ifs, ands, etc...she did her best. Many peoples lives changed after the trial. Books, TMZ, Keeping up with the Kardashians, TV movies, interviews, etc....2 people died, it was devistating then, and devistating now. Families were broken, lives changed, children involved. Sad
They are his gloves
Even though they were at least one size too small???
I knew he was guilty since the bronco spectacle but knew he would never get convicted. It was scary. More riots. More people killed if he was found guilty. It was a pressure cooker.
Why wasn't the bronco impound right away and how was oj driving down the road a week later in it.
He was in Al’s bronco
it was identical to his
La did not want another riot..
I think the prosecution messed up. They have the upper hand and have all the facts in their favor.
I would like to know how much support did Gil give the team for this case.
OJ had the best lawyers even pr consultants and crisis managers. OJ’s team played entertainment while the prosecution stuck with the legalese. Guess what, the jury liked the former more.
No matter how you slice the pie. Or whatever you call it. OJ's defense team played to win. If anyone was in the same place as OJ Simpson. They wouldn't complain about how their lawyers won the case. If the lawyers played entertainment to win. Oh well.
The curl gurl
So Marcia went back to brunette?
For her to act like race and planting evidence isn't a reality makes her a terrible prosecutor.
She doesn't believe that; she's still milking that trial for decades... what else would she say? See the video here on TH-cam entitled, "My Brother the Serial Killer."
@@calicodnikonian2774 everybody involved in the trial that were against OJ Simpson are still, until this day, getting rich off of OJ. Since they feel so strong that he committed those crimes. Why not just give free interviews. Or donate all revenue from the book sales to a charity. From the Goldmans, to the prosecution, to the LAPD. OJ Simpson is their cash cow. And they know it.
@Kensington Drake: Race and planting evidence are realities, but were not material to this case, where they were used by the defense as a side-show, a distraction.
This woman had nerves showing her face on National TV. An incompetent lawyer....she is still making excuses and deflecting.
Marcia looks younger now than she did during the trial..
They are surgery took decades off of her age..
she was a stressed-out chain smoker getting bullied at the time
She is a Rich Woman Now
she did a terrible job and came out with a book deal worth 42 salaries. pff
Kathy Kay
for me...everybody knew from the very first day that he would be acquited....from the very first day, so the trial became a soap opera...just that!!!
Marcia was the only one. No obe rkse could of tried it l
Older she got the better she looks
That fact cost her A LOT of money...
🧤🧑🔬🕵️🧑⚕️🤹🃏
Damn she's beautiful.
She didn’t say anything about the racist cops on the force.
@Dave Scott Mark Fuhrman is a proven racist cop.
Of course she didn't...she was one of them...
I’m so tired of that bull crap logic, of him acting out whether the glove fit or not. You can’t fake that. Stick to the the shrinkage and arthritis logic. Stop it with the acting logic. It’s not a good argument at all. It’s terrible for anyone to make it. Even worse for a decorated attorney like Marcia Clark to make it. Knock it off.
A competent prosecutor would've had a team of investigators search out where the glove was bought and by whom, in an effort to prove the argument. IT PROBABLY was and the findings hidden away by the prosecution. It's called Due Diligence but in this case, it's called unfair and unlawful practices since defense attorneys are afforded the right BY LAW and jurisprudence to see and know what the evidence is against the suspect.
Calico D'Nikonian
Exactly
lf you want to be a DA, you better know what your doing.....she didn`t.
But she's been milking the OJ Trial for decades, blaming others for her failures on paid lecture tours, book deals and paid TV appearances whenever she has a book out. She was given the no-win trial by other more experienced prosecutors; she was on the bottom of the proverbial totem pole. Darden was chosen to represent blackness, to ward off claims of biases, prejudice and racism. I NEVER liked OJ and his arrogant and wealth which he flaunted everywhere he opened his yap; I STILL think he's an arrogant schmuck's scumbag. But... what else can he be with a father that was a cross-dressing homosexual who lived openly with a "husband," and he later died of AIDS? OJ's characters flaws may well be attributed to the shame he lived with all his life.
No offence but larry king looked so bored. His questions were like they were written down in bullet point form and were not reactive in substance to anything she said.
She imposed limits to the questioning by the host of the program. Common practice. No surprises or "cheap shots" for Marcia's little flat hiney, who's been milking the OJ Trial for decades in paid speaking tours, book sales, paid TV appearances, etc.
Oh he always looked like that
dont say anything just accept the truth that you got the wrong simpson. and dont feel sorrry for losing the trial you became a millionaire writing books about oj.
and running around on paid lecture tours and paid TV appearances.
Marcia Clark is in the same category as Kim and Fred Goldman. Nothing but fraudsters, scammers, and opportunist.
poor lady still hasn't gotten her hair correct after 30 years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! her hairdresser should get life in prison
She look different
Her beautician is a mortician.
worst prosecutor of all time
A loser of a Lawyer who is cashing in after a terrible case against an innocent man. The evidence they presented didnt make sense...
c
I don't know what is is but she just seems so disingenuous when she speaks.
She is. She, and even people on her own team, knew OJ wasnt at the crime scene
@@Jim.Jim.32 An axiom followed by the better attorneys and prosecutors is to examine evidence AND disprove POSSIBLE arguments by the opposition. She was given a no-win case rejected by other more experienced prosecutors. She was grasping at straws with her Strawman Arguments. Since the OJ Trial, she's been relegated to small cases, just to keep her busy, so she can claim she's "earning" her salary.
She was a prosecutor. They are ALL disingenuous....
Nobody talks about the elephant in the room. 10 of the 12 jurors were black....
shes had plastic surgery...looks better now than 20 years ago lol
Her beautician is a mortician.
mark furhman give oj a gift of not guilty. you gotta love that?
They suspected Fuhrman since January and the tapes came out on August. --- He confessed his hatred to black mean who spouse white women. He knew the Simpsons. In '85 as Nicole ran into his arms after she called the cops on OJ for domestic abuse case and Fuhrman was the cop who showed up. ___ Nothing happened that day as no charges were pressed, although ironically he wrote a report in ’89 (four years later), when he wasn't on that case. Why? Because he said the '85 case left him with “insurable impression". Of the 9 calls by Nicole, only Fuhrman wrote a report, a four years late report .
This is the man who “found" the gloves. He pleaded the 5th when asked if he planted evidence! His tape recording were not all played in court. Surprisingly, similar words were uttered and written in request for a “risk pay" pension in early 80s. The defence had a long suspicion about Fuhrman at the start of the trial, the tape were discovered in late August. It just proved every suspicion about him.
Not enough!! The sloppy work by the criminalists and the forensic team created many doubts. After OJ gave a blood samples, detective Vannater took the blood vial not to the lab, but to OJ's house, presumably to give it to the criminalists there. Ironically, they can't account for 1.5 millilitres of missing blood. The blood on the sock which the man who took it from the scene Mr. Fung, had EDTA (a blood preservative usually added to blood vials). And Mr. Fung initial note on the sock was that it didn't had any bloods on it.
Doubts were all over the place for the jury. The alleged blood stained clothes and the knife was thrown out by OJ at the airport, but he was careless enough to leave a “bloody” sock on his bedroom.
Kato Kaelin heard three loud bangs behind his room. The prosecution say OJ hit his head on the AC unit three times (like a loony tunes cartoon). There were no injuries on OJ's head. Ron Goldman had bruised knuckles, he fought for his life, yet no bruises on OJ's body.
⚠️ My point is, the defence created enough doubts, to make conviction on “beyond reasonable doubt" an impossible task
@atletico ATM: You put any criminal case under a high-power microscope, you will find discrepancies, inconsistencies, errors, incompetence, unanswered questions, here and there. The same can be said even for simple traffic accidents. But when you look at those things in the context of this entire case, they don't amount to a hill of beans. Unless, of course you can pair a team of shyster lawyers with a distracted jury who can be easily bamboozled. So many details you've got wrong here, but the time 'twould take to educate you would be wasted on someone seemingly so incapable of reformation.
I kinda don't like her man lol
No one proved he killed anyone.
David Lamotta it's pretty obvious he did
dragonddarkPSN planted evidence
Has she had plastic surgery. She doesn't even resemble facially the original Marcia Clark that stood in that trial.
Have you ever seen Her $35,000,000 Estate in Pacific Palisades?
She also has a $12,000,000 vacation home in Hawaii.
@@ozten-fj6pe what do her various houses have to do with whether she has had plastic surgery or not. I asked if she had had plastic surgery because she doesn't look anything like she did. We all change as we age obviously but she looks nothing like the same woman that stood in that courtroom.
@@jujuoliver6959 Well it doesn't matter about her homes or $100,000,000 Stock portfolio. She was paid handsomely for her role in the 2nd biggest fictional story since Old Testament. She doesn't like to be recognized nor the Caitlyns.
@@ozten-fj6pe you are still not making sense but hey ho it's TH-cam.
Fact is, OJ just didn't do it. OJ won the case because he just didn't do it!!
@lou: OJ did it. Deal with it.
You don't really know anything
Deluded
Holy plastic surgery
CovidImages need to be invested more than half19
She aged BADLY.
liecrusher she got better looking with age
liecrusher she actually looks better than OJ right now, but guess what... no one cares how OJ looks right now because he is a man, but there is people who cares about the way she looks because she is a woman.
liecrusher I'm crushing your lie right now ...she looks great baby boy
At that time ppl judged her based on her look instead of what she was doing. Sadly nothing has changed even today!
@@SaMmY12pAnDa Her beautician is a mortician.
She is an idiot for allowing the glove wearing into evidence Leather shrinks when coming into contact with moisture and going over latex gloves too
Bag job
she didn't allow it