@@Spankmepinkthis comment never said he was! The watch was stolen the smile on his face says a lot! He stole that watch your brother is like a father to you but you don’t have his number saved or don’t know where he is? I believe he still it and is throwing his brother under the bus
She comes across as very credible, and her son didn't seem coached. Word vs word cases with no concrete proof tend to favor the defendant on judge Judy, but I think the indicators of Truth swayed things
@ what’s wrong with a 13 yr old having a sleepover? Child molestors, all kinds of things can go on outside of your roof. The kid went to a sleepover and now the poor mother is in court smh
I knew it was stolen from episode 1. He first said his daughter was messing with it. Then told the plantiff his brother took it? I think he stole it and split the cash with his brother. Also lesson learn dont get your kids expensive items if they arent responsible.
It’s okay to buy nice things for your children. I had parents who occasionally rewarded us with nice things but whenever we left, said things were to be left at home for safety reasons.
His daughter is five. Seems like if he saw her playing with an expensive watch he had to know wasn’t hers, he would have taken it from her immediately.
People like you are the ones who give others life sentences(or any time locked up)when there's clearly resonable doubt AND you want him to pay for his brother's "crime". What if the ruling included time, he should go to prison and then sue his brother later? I know the show pays, but the law is the law. Everyone should pay for their own crimes
As I understand it, the show pays the judgments out, not the plaintiffs or defendants. So JJ didn’t want the defendant or his brother getting off easy.
I wish the judge called him out for being a liar. No sober + sane person would believe someone doesent have the contact info of someone who is " like a father " to him.
She definitely did know, she just couldn’t hold the defendant accountable for the actions of his brother. It was only when I got to part 3 that I was absolutely sure the plaintiff knew what she was talking about and was telling the truth.
The defendant is such a liar... I don't know where my brother is. I don't have my brother's number. Oops. .. thats' a friend... oh there's a number saved under the name and big brother. This man just spoiled a friendship for nothing.
I disagree with JJ. If the item was stolen from the defendant's house then he should be responsible for it. He then has the burden of getting it back from his brother who stole it. JJ didn't want to make that judgement because she and her team would have to pay out. Love her show but she needs to be more consistent on her ruling.
No, it’s not because the show would have to pay for it. Legally, he’s not responsible. A crime was committed and even though he knows and is related to the person and it took place in his house, that actually doesn’t make him legally responsible. I would have loved to see this guy have to pay too and I think so would JJ, but she has to follow the rule of law, even when she doesn’t like it. I hate that about this profession.
Unfortunately without a witness or evidence, her saying that he said his brother stole it (which is often considered hearsay and something JJ usually says), there's not much JJ can do. If he told her that his brother took it, she should have reported it, not sue the defendant.
@@jedimasters1462 It’s not hearsay when it’s a statement by a party opponent. The defendant is the one who told the plaintiff his brother stole it. That’s admissible. The problem is the plaintiff should have sued the brother, not the defendant. The plaintiff was operating under the misconception that the defendant would be liable because it happened when the watch was at his house. That’s not true because a crime was committed. If the brother was a minor under the defendant’s control, it would be a different story, that’s why she asked his age. A full-grown adult thief committed the crime so he is the one who has to be sued in order to recover damages under the law.
It’s exactly the same as if you stay at a hotel and you miss something and the hotel says “we’re sorry we couldn’t find it” you can’t sue them if you have no proof. He’s not responsible
What a piece of crap to steal this kid's watch. Then this guy lies in court saying he didn't have the #, then the bailiff sees it in the phone. That's messed up! You can't trust people.
She probably didn't think negatively about him until he started acting up, lying and covering for his thieving brother. Besides she was friends with the defendants girlfriend, not him
“As u can see judge her story is all over the place “ says the person who lied about having his brother’s number thats actually saved in his phone as “big brother stevie” dumb dumb😂if anything her story was on track and she seemed to b very honest and her son too. He was prolly drunk at that baby shower and blabbering telling in himself
Wow. I hope the boys can still be friends, but DO NOT let that cute little boy go over to the defendant's house with ANYTHING of VALUE. I know kids (and adults) like to show off their cool stuff, but he cannot do that at the def's house.
He is very shameful he knew his brother stole that watch the whole time when judge Judy asked who all lived in the house and a big brother came up that was it after that😂😂😂
I hope she got a resolution to this case AND she's more sensible about what she gives her young son. Things happen when kids have expensive things around certain types 👀
Ugh, I can’t stand the defendants little smirk-acting like he’s in a photoshoot. And those braids? Giving very much ‘I did it, but you can’t prove it’s vibes.
I don't believe the defendant one second. Proven liar covering up for his thief of a brother. But I'm very confused as to why the plaintiff changed her story. If he told her that he brother stole the watch, why make such a show about "oh if he'd lost something at my house I would replace it"? She is probably telling the truth, I do believe she is, but she doesn't appear credible.
I hope this mother realizes that a 13 year old kid doesn’t need an Apple Watch. Heck, zi almost 70 and I won’t buy one for myself! Mom is lucky some older kids didn’t jump him and steal it. By the way, did it not have “find my device” set up?
UNDERRATED COMMENT!!! When I was that age, I lost almost everything that wasn't nailed down in my room. And the ONLY reason I can think of to give my son an Apple Watch, is to USE the FIND MY SON feature.
Second case I’ve seen where parents get their young kids something very expensive that can be lost or stolen. Why on earth?! The last case was the $400 earrings! Similar scenario. I could get a new washing machine for that! Just about 😂🙄
I believe mom's statement about what the defendant said about his thieving brother. However, she was stupid for buying an expensive watch for a child. Ridiculousssssssssssssss!
I think she didn't want to have to mention the brothers involvement out of a misplaced respect for their friendship but she had to when she realised it was the only hope of winning
Why r these always presented in a non ordered sequence where part 3 show up 1st and more than likely the 1,2, or 4 or 5 im going to have to hunt down as i seem to
I wish I could be one of the neighbors when they went back to the block cause I know they was tight😂😂 and the brother definitely stole that damn watch. The smirk said it all. Smh stealing from kids wat shame!!!
First she says in part one they are like family, friends for years,, now that she is losing suddenly she is saying the defendant whom she trusted to take care of her son over night, is a known thief. She is making crap up as she goes. Nor can Judy just order this defendant to turn his phone over to her. Sometimes she goes too far. What proof Judy? He didn't admit anything on tape. He said on this tape his brother had nothing to do with it, and her saying the opposite is hearsay. She has no case.
![Judge Judy [Episode 3367] Best Amazing Cases Season 2025 Full Episodes HD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7MJEtmUJEdM/mqdefault.jpg)
So he doesn't have his brother's phone number saved , who he says is like a father figure to him 😂
Judge Judy is known for many things; stupidity is definitely not one of them.
Totally forgot he said that
But bird then found the number. So he had the saved number of his "father figure". Shady shady super shady.
LmmFaSsO hahahaha why your comment tickled me soo much 😅😂🤣😭
Came to say the same. If he’s a father figure, you are close and you’ll have his number. What a father figure 🙄
The brother definitely stole the watch 😢
And it doesn't matter; he isn't responsible for his brother stealing.
@@Spankmepinkthis comment never said he was! The watch was stolen the smile on his face says a lot! He stole that watch your brother is like a father to you but you don’t have his number saved or don’t know where he is? I believe he still it and is throwing his brother under the bus
@@kimlove4740& he’s lying for him because how don’t you have his contact information yet they found it as big brother Stevie in your phone 😂😂😂😭😭😭
@@Spankmepink as a good citizen, shouldn't you report a crime? Well now if he is a good citizen shouldn't it be his responsibility?
@@Spankmepink If he is aware his brother stole the watch then it is his responsibility to tell the court that
She’s too pissed. I believe her.
She comes across as very credible, and her son didn't seem coached. Word vs word cases with no concrete proof tend to favor the defendant on judge Judy, but I think the indicators of Truth swayed things
and the motto is dont buy a kid more than 20 bucks watch,
THIS. She is furious. I believe her.
Me
Honestly, I believe that SHE believes what she's saying.
"He's like a father figure to me."
And
"I don't have his number."
Yeah, but who said father figure in good meaning of that word?😂😂
His father figure is living with him, his girlfriend, and two children in an apartment
He was just covering for his dad 😂
😂😂
3:00 Defendant: "I don't have the number"
JJ: "Big Brother Stevie...got the number" 😂😂😂I can not!
Right it’s not in the ‘S’ part of the contacts it’s in the ‘B’s’ for big brother…😂😂😂
😂😂
@@ajbarbee2678 🤣👍
@@zuritribe4844 🤣👍
@@ajbarbee2678There's a "He's full of BS" joke in there somewhere but I can't quite find it!
Who steals from a little kid?! So low.
No honor amongst thieves
Addicts.
A thief
Right so disgusting
Crackheads
The mother and child is telling the truth. The brother doesn't know where Stevie lives? But your sure he didn't take the watch?!
You’re *
The little boy's braids are gorgeous
Truly. ❤
The little boy is handsome and well spoken.
The worms on the man are hideous.
They are?????
@@kamwilliams5541yes 🤎
His brother is changing that number as soon as his brother calls him after he leaves the court!
Yep, I bet this poor lady didn’t see a dime.
You don’t ever, ever, ever send your kid to a friends house for the weekend. Especially with a valuable item
When I was a in that age group, I lost almost everything that was given to me. Giving a 13 year old an Apple Watch is just asking for it to be lost.
Wtf is the problem with a 13 yo having a sleepover? Yeah don't send them with anything valuable but how overprotective can you be?
@ what’s wrong with a 13 yr old having a sleepover? Child molestors, all kinds of things can go on outside of your roof.
The kid went to a sleepover and now the poor mother is in court smh
The valuable "item" would be the child ❤
Right, he also took his PlayStation with him, SMH!
As I get older in understand more and more why my parents didn’t allow us to sleep over at peoples homes
I used to go to sleepovers, but when I do have children, they are not going to sleepovers at all
I knew it was stolen from episode 1. He first said his daughter was messing with it. Then told the plantiff his brother took it? I think he stole it and split the cash with his brother. Also lesson learn dont get your kids expensive items if they arent responsible.
Truth be told them grown men probably pocketed it from the little boy
It’s okay to buy nice things for your children. I had parents who occasionally rewarded us with nice things but whenever we left, said things were to be left at home for safety reasons.
His daughter is five. Seems like if he saw her playing with an expensive watch he had to know wasn’t hers, he would have taken it from her immediately.
@FuriousStylez93 I said if theyre not responsible. Meaning he left his watch unattended
"He's like a father figure to me....But I don't have his number or know where he lives right now"
She must breakup their friendship, they stole that watch.
At that age, those pre-teens will always find a way to play together.
@@kevinalleyne361 The smirking, laughing and the absolute nonchalant behaviour of the defendant was disgusting. No morals at all!
@@ehrelmaletzky I agree.
She called him a thief on national television, pretty sure the friendship is over.
I think judge Judy should’ve made the defendant pay and sue his own brother if he really stole it
People like you are the ones who give others life sentences(or any time locked up)when there's clearly resonable doubt AND you want him to pay for his brother's "crime". What if the ruling included time, he should go to prison and then sue his brother later? I know the show pays, but the law is the law. Everyone should pay for their own crimes
That’s not how the law works.
She would have if she could, but legally he’s not responsible. She still has to follow the rule of law.
As I understand it, the show pays the judgments out, not the plaintiffs or defendants. So JJ didn’t want the defendant or his brother getting off easy.
Agreed. Especially after he pretended not to have his brother's number
"Hand him the phone! HAND HIM THE PHONE!" 📱
I wish the judge called him out for being a liar. No sober + sane person would believe someone doesent have the contact info of someone who is " like a father " to him.
‘His brother is a thief, just like him’, so why let your son stay over at his house?
She realized after this incident obviously. Are you slow or just acting like it?
@@itsfatiima hope is slow. She is looking to blame the plaintiff.
He did it
This is the most “New York City” case I’ve ever seen lol
Yes!
It's giving the BX to be specific 😂
😂😂 I was trying to figure out the accents…
@@ajbarbee2678 she is Hispanic from BX for sure 😅😂
@ thank you!! I was like what is happening!!??!!!
Stealing from a kid is pretty low 🤦🏻♂️
Yea that pissed me off. Showing the youth not to trust men
Well the brother is a thief what would you expect?
"As you can see, her story is all over the place!"
I dont see that at all.... but yours definitely is young man!
3:38 Do you understand? GOOD!!! 😂😂😂
Judge knew that they stole that watch.
She definitely did know, she just couldn’t hold the defendant accountable for the actions of his brother. It was only when I got to part 3 that I was absolutely sure the plaintiff knew what she was talking about and was telling the truth.
The defendant is such a liar...
I don't know where my brother is. I don't have my brother's number. Oops. .. thats' a friend... oh there's a number saved under the name and big brother.
This man just spoiled a friendship for nothing.
dude got caught lying at the end
he stole it ! come on na bc why else would he say he would pay it back lmao
I disagree with JJ. If the item was stolen from the defendant's house then he should be responsible for it. He then has the burden of getting it back from his brother who stole it. JJ didn't want to make that judgement because she and her team would have to pay out. Love her show but she needs to be more consistent on her ruling.
No, it’s not because the show would have to pay for it. Legally, he’s not responsible. A crime was committed and even though he knows and is related to the person and it took place in his house, that actually doesn’t make him legally responsible. I would have loved to see this guy have to pay too and I think so would JJ, but she has to follow the rule of law, even when she doesn’t like it. I hate that about this profession.
and that’s why you’re not a judge and she is.
Unfortunately without a witness or evidence, her saying that he said his brother stole it (which is often considered hearsay and something JJ usually says), there's not much JJ can do. If he told her that his brother took it, she should have reported it, not sue the defendant.
@@jedimasters1462 It’s not hearsay when it’s a statement by a party opponent. The defendant is the one who told the plaintiff his brother stole it. That’s admissible. The problem is the plaintiff should have sued the brother, not the defendant. The plaintiff was operating under the misconception that the defendant would be liable because it happened when the watch was at his house. That’s not true because a crime was committed. If the brother was a minor under the defendant’s control, it would be a different story, that’s why she asked his age. A full-grown adult thief committed the crime so he is the one who has to be sued in order to recover damages under the law.
It’s exactly the same as if you stay at a hotel and you miss something and the hotel says “we’re sorry we couldn’t find it” you can’t sue them if you have no proof. He’s not responsible
He’s lying..
It's obvious when he lied to judge Judy's have about not having his brothers number.
Grown sorry men need to be ashamed of themselves stealing a kid's watch.
What a piece of crap to steal this kid's watch. Then this guy lies in court saying he didn't have the #, then the bailiff sees it in the phone. That's messed up! You can't trust people.
Judge Judy should’ve ruled in her favor since he sat up there and lied in her face!
2:41 You know how to work that thang bird
😂😂
😂
“Do you know how to work that thing, Byrd?” 😂
Oh boy the defendant needs a better father figure
Little boy is smart and JJ couldn't scare him off, you can tell his mum is protective and taking good care of him
Defendant was caught in a blatant lie.
Why she took that long to say that his brother stole the watch??
She had to tell her story in chronological order.
He told her that not thinking it would get this far but she wouldn’t have known the brother was there any other way
💯
If she thinks so little of him WHY did she allow her son to spend the weekend?????
Good catch!
bc that has nothing to do with the KIDS. You don't bring adult beef around your children they are allowed to be friends
She probably didn't think negatively about him until he started acting up, lying and covering for his thieving brother. Besides she was friends with the defendants girlfriend, not him
Exactly! Called the defendant a thief too. Poor parenting letting a 13 year old go around him.
Probably dont want to hurt her kid who likes his friend. If anything, let the friend come over at their home. I wouldnt send him over there no more.
“As u can see judge her story is all over the place “ says the person who lied about having his brother’s number thats actually saved in his phone as “big brother stevie” dumb dumb😂if anything her story was on track and she seemed to b very honest and her son too. He was prolly drunk at that baby shower and blabbering telling in himself
Infuriating defendant. Lies to JJ. No shame at all. Wipe that smirk off your damn face! JJ hated him too!
Oh the brother definitely stole that watch. I could tell by the look on his face
Sad thing is the parents are probably preventing the kids from being friends over something the brother may have done.
That brother stole the watch & sold it 🫤
He’s a thief?
THEN WHY DO YOU LET YOU SON HANG OUT THERE?!?!
SMDH
She only said that because of the incident, he had to be a thief to be covering for his theiving brother. Before that, they were fine.
Wow. I hope the boys can still be friends, but DO NOT let that cute little boy go over to the defendant's house with ANYTHING of VALUE. I know kids (and adults) like to show off their cool stuff, but he cannot do that at the def's house.
The plaintiff was very consistent, she and her son need to stay away from the defendant
He’s like a father figure…who steels and doesn’t have a job LOL!
Steals*
He is very shameful he knew his brother stole that watch the whole time when judge Judy asked who all lived in the house and a big brother came up that was it after that😂😂😂
With friends like him you won’t need enemies, despicable dishonest robber, judge Judy it’s a pity she could not have seen them both back in her court.
I hope she got a resolution to this case AND she's more sensible about what she gives her young son. Things happen when kids have expensive things around certain types 👀
Best ending EVER…GOOD took me outtttt 😂
Judge Judy be thinking these litigants are working together to get free money lol
JJ: do you understand?
Defendant: yes ma'am!!
JJ: Good!! 🥴
Too damn funny. . 😂🤣😅
He knows he told her that cuz how she knew all of his brother business 😭
Ooooo now this was a turn around I didn’t see coming!
Ha if Byrd didn’t walk up to him u just know he would’ve covered for his theif brother 😂
Judge Judy is so good!
Can't they use Find My
Its not always reliable
@@sanguinedekker7287
It is more reliable in 2025 than it was when this was filmed, for sure!
The brother done stole that damn watch
brother stevie better ditch that burner phone quick
Not relevant, but who braids the lil boys head they are 🔥🔥
Dang!! Was hoping JJ was going to make a phone call to the brother from the phone!! 😝
He knows his brother took that watch😂
Ugh, I can’t stand the defendants little smirk-acting like he’s in a photoshoot. And those braids? Giving very much ‘I did it, but you can’t prove it’s vibes.
I don't believe the defendant one second. Proven liar covering up for his thief of a brother.
But I'm very confused as to why the plaintiff changed her story. If he told her that he brother stole the watch, why make such a show about "oh if he'd lost something at my house I would replace it"? She is probably telling the truth, I do believe she is, but she doesn't appear credible.
Happy weekend, everyone!
Why didn’t the mom track the Apple Watch?
I hope this mother realizes that a 13 year old kid doesn’t need an Apple Watch. Heck, zi almost 70 and I won’t buy one for myself! Mom is lucky some older kids didn’t jump him and steal it. By the way, did it not have “find my device” set up?
This was probably recorded in 2018 or 2019 … I don’t remember if we had locator apps back then.
UNDERRATED COMMENT!!! When I was that age, I lost almost everything that wasn't nailed down in my room. And the ONLY reason I can think of to give my son an Apple Watch, is to USE the FIND MY SON feature.
@@PartyOf8Please - it was made available a few years before that.
The defendant's smiles and smerks make me sick....
Moral of the story: Don’t buy your kids expensive gifts until they’ve shown you they are responsible and can take care of expensive gifts.
Second case I’ve seen where parents get their young kids something very expensive that can be lost or stolen. Why on earth?! The last case was the $400 earrings! Similar scenario. I could get a new washing machine for that! Just about 😂🙄
I bet any money If JJ would have called the brother. The brother would have said THE DEFENDANT stole the watch !!!! 😂😂😂💯
That man is lying
Thanks Judge!!!!
I believe her 100%
You don't have information about your Father figure that is in YOUR house around your family
He has his mom’s entire face. Adorable.
Yeah, his brother took the watch.
I believe the plaintiff ❤
She should have awarded him the money for the watch. You could tell he was lying
he’s lying.
Lmao the brother sold the watch to a dummy. Because you can’t use stolen Apple Watches 😂
You know how to work that thing Bird😅
She said she had known the defendant for 15 years and she said he was a thief. What does this tell you about her???
I believe mom's statement about what the defendant said about his thieving brother. However, she was stupid for buying an expensive watch for a child. Ridiculousssssssssssssss!
Judge Judy is a wonderful human being. She is unafraid to punish stupid people like that defendant.
Some people look nice, like the defendant, but only until they open their mouth
He looks nice why? Because he has light skin??? 😂😂 please …
I wasn’t expecting her to sound like that.
Stevie changed that number so quick lmaoooooooooooooooo
Well, that took a turn.
If his brother is really a father figure, he should have that number.
Who steals from their own friends? God that's horrible
I think she didn't want to have to mention the brothers involvement out of a misplaced respect for their friendship but she had to when she realised it was the only hope of winning
Why r these always presented in a non ordered sequence where part 3 show up 1st and more than likely the 1,2, or 4 or 5 im going to have to hunt down as i seem to
Not true. They upload them in chronological order. It's probably just your algorithm.
This is like a cross over….an episode of the boondocks of some background characters going on judge Judy
I wish I could be one of the neighbors when they went back to the block cause I know they was tight😂😂 and the brother definitely stole that damn watch. The smirk said it all. Smh stealing from kids wat shame!!!
Dude's from the Bronx...definitely a thief
First she says in part one they are like family, friends for years,, now that she is losing suddenly she is saying the defendant whom she trusted to take care of her son over night, is a known thief. She is making crap up as she goes. Nor can Judy just order this defendant to turn his phone over to her. Sometimes she goes too far. What proof Judy? He didn't admit anything on tape. He said on this tape his brother had nothing to do with it, and her saying the opposite is hearsay. She has no case.
All they have to do to find out where the watch is, is to log into the apple account and use the "find my" feature.