Justice Khanna would always be immortal in the history of our Constitutional law and in our hearts. His dissenting judgment in ADM Jabalpur and also his consenting judgment in the Kesavananda Bharati case ,. For the basic structure theory would always be one of the finest judgment !
Ashwani Malhotra whatever was the case, the man regretted his decision during ADM Jabalpur case and most of his decisions after that was pro people. He practically gave a new meaning to Article 14 and 21, which we wouldn’t have got if not for him.
Most of the articles purported to be developing the law were infact reducing the original Law in effect. The @SCofIndia mostly sits in to reduce the law in exhibitions of its jurisprudence.
Its the pan ,paper and mind of judges , for whom you live in legal safe society now, Well there is a lot of things , the power of judges to mould the Law of land.. ,a single nod of judge is suffice to decide validity of laws ?? Its because of great works of Judges and Jurists ,that have Brought this constitution
Justice Khanna would always be immortal in the history of our Constitutional law and in our hearts. His dissenting judgment in ADM Jabalpur and also his consenting judgment in the Kesavananda Bharati case ,. For the basic structure theory would always be one of the finest judgment !
At least, he apologised for that blot of a judgement.
Salute to the honourable judge. Confession worth priceless.
Just want to listen listen and listen those strong pillars of our judicial system.
Integrity & Courage are two preconditions of confession. 👏🏻👏🏻 #learning_of_the_day
In Maneka Gandhi case, the learned judge enlarged the embryo of Article 14 in very glowing terms. #respect
You persuaded yourself sir. These apologies won't wash away the Sin.
Persuaded? You were not a ten year old kid Justice. You simply lacked what Khanna had.
Ashwani Malhotra whatever was the case, the man regretted his decision during ADM Jabalpur case and most of his decisions after that was pro people. He practically gave a new meaning to Article 14 and 21, which we wouldn’t have got if not for him.
@@prithvirajjs6397 Agree, his PIL legacy lives on. But still, he should not have dissented in Minerva Mills 1980
The list is too long for him, justice khanna did what was right and had his chance of becoming cji ruined. It's the same thing happening now again.
Justice Bhagwati talking about ADM Jabalpur Vs Shivkant Shukla or popularly known as Habeas Corpus case
Is this also called minerva mills case?
@@PrateekSharma016 no, that is a different case
2:00 - 3:00 adm jabalpur
Most of the articles purported to be developing the law were infact reducing the original Law in effect. The @SCofIndia mostly sits in to reduce the law in exhibitions of its jurisprudence.
And sorry to say rewriting the article is not what judges are supposed to do.
Ashwani Malhotra it’s not literal rewriting, he means he gave a totally different and new meaning to the articles than what was held earlier.
Ashwani you are not from legal ground ,, are you ????
Its the pan ,paper and mind of judges , for whom you live in legal safe society now, Well there is a lot of things , the power of judges to mould the Law of land.. ,a single nod of judge is suffice to decide validity of laws ?? Its because of great works of Judges and Jurists ,that have Brought this constitution
❤❤❤
4:20 - 5:20 maneka gandhi
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bhagwati aka ADM Jabalpur: citizens don't have rights in emergencies. Awwwww.
💕💕
" I Favoured the Judgement but that Judgement was against my conscience " 😂😂😂 ...idk what this is called...Stupidity, manipulation or something else?
देख कर लग रहा रो रहे है क्या लेकिन नही ये रो नही हस रहे है
अब दलालों के चक्कर क्या बहुत देश सेवा हुआ