Something I miss from civ v was how each unit was represented by ten or twelve troops (or five for cavalry). It really helped make you feel you had an army, rather than just a few squads and one or two cavalry (types) like in civ vi
While I can agree that I liked CIV 5’s realistic art style, the colors in Civ6 just really make it better for me, so in 5 years when civ 7 comes out I hope they combine the petty colorful civ 6 with more of a civ 5 art style
@Fgg Fgg well at least look at the bright side, these cartoony graphics make it easier for the game to run on many computers, for example, my computer couldn't even load the civ 5 intro.
GFSuperTrooper When you make a game for kids you make it look that way, when makinga game for old geezers you should not (10 year olds can never understand Civ anyway).
Peter Magro Im stating that the art style is similar to another game . A games art styling has nothing to do with its depth one could look at games like fallout and skyrim and see they are gritty in a way or tf2 which is cartoonish but then harken back to Civ Rev where the same art design is used as in this game. Im not questioning or defying depth by styling or graphics Im simply stating an observation.
Civ5 is my favourite. Civ6 is certainly got beautiful, crisp graphics and I love the 'fog of war' map cartography but Civ6 is altogether too colourful and cartoony
Dude shut the fuck UP civ 6 has a much BETTER feeling for example, in civ 5 once u create a builder you got that builder forever and u just got em raoming around him doing nothing and shit to summarzie extremely annoying, in civ 6 they fixed that shit. Another point the animations for example so MUCH BETTER dude that shit awesome. Also civilization 6 the new art style u just gotta deal with it. cartoon is IN these days so you better you get used t that hell even battle field 1 looks a little cartoonish.
"u just got em raoming around him doing nothing" if this is really your problem then you're fucking stupid... because you can DELETE HIM, get some money for that and subtract the per turn maintenance cost of the unit by doing that... this pretty much means any opinion you post here i have to ASSUME is wrong
so why don't armies do the same, just disappear after some uses? plus even so they will still last a few thousand or hundred years depending on era before being used too much.
really bothers me that they chose to do a cartoonish character designs. I thought they were gonna just make it like civ 5 graphics but even better. I still love the game. A retexture mod would be amazing. Atleast for the leaders
check out my game Hip Hop Block on App Store Pls dealing with the AI leaders in civ 6 is ridiculous. I've played many games and only once have I managed to make a declaration of friendship with another civ and then ally myself with them. If you spawn near France on a higher difficulty, she'll tell you that you should really start paying attention to the things going on around you then denounce you a turn later for being weak in espionage. Same goes for Rome, the AI start with 2 cities on higher difficulties so he'll ask if you are afraid of expansion then denounce you literally one turn later for not having any land. In civ 5 the only reason the AI would denounce you and act hostile toward you was if you were a real asshole. In civ 6, AI will ask you to help them attack another civ and as soon as the war is over, denounce you for being a warmonger because you accepted it. Half the time you get a formal war declared on you in the first 20 turns even if you haven't been denounced and then you kill off the two units the AI send and then they beg you to have mercy and give you a bunch of stuff for peace. Don't even get me started on how the leaders look, civ 5 was realistic with the leaders and they look like they had quite a bit of work put into them, civ 6 looks like someone drew the leaders with their eyes closed and then coloured it with crayons. The terrain doesn't even look realistic either, it's bright and colourful but civ 5 had the more real look to it and that's a big part of the reason people liked it. Civ 6 has been a major disappointment so far and I'm glad I didn't buy it but was able to play it anyway and see how it really is.
check out my game Hip Hop Block on App Store Pls Yeah, I only just convinced myself to get Civ VI on the Steam Summer sale today hoping the gameplay improvements could make up for the crap cartoony art style/graphics. The look of the terrain is a lot worse in VI (in my opinion), but the thing that really drives me crazy are the leaders. Gandhi looks like a deformed turtle man. And then to add insult to injury the AI is just as bad if not worse than in V. What were the devs thinking??
Civ V is a remake of civ III with pseudo-realistic design and civ VI is a remake of civ IV with cartoonish design. Originality is not a priority for firaxis it seems
I always love Civ V. It was pretty much the way I was introduction to this great game series. The beautiful graphics, the real texture and aesthetic was beautiful in my eyes. It is truly a hallmark of the series. Civ VI, well, I had to let it grow on me. At first I was against it, seeing as it was so complicated and I couldn’t even win. Eventually, I learned how to win the game and I began to notice small details. The colorful scheme, the changing night and day, the beautiful wonder mini movies, even the graphics had a sort of charm. They popped out, and quite beautifully in my opinion. The crisp textures, the smooth lines and shading, it grew on me. The two games are both great, and beautiful in their own way. Civ V with its beautiful realistic graphics and Civ VI with its charming and bold look.
I would never play Civ 5 if I never found the IGE It’s so fun to secretly sabotage other players and frame them for random things while giving yourself infinite gold
This is the thing I hated about civ Vi....and also. I liked the artworks in Policy adoption interface of Civ V. Now in Civ VI all these civics are some small letters on some wired red,green or yellow cards
Civ 5 had interesting graphics overall for me, the leaders, the cities, battle animation, even when it got glitchy in longer games and larger maps (troops floating instead of walking or running on foot), but Civ 6 has better looking nukes and some battle animations like Swordsmen and catapult has better animation. In catapult, you can see the engineer placing the boulder after it's fired, same with Bazooka unit.
King_Oskar civ 5 had better animations, there were more soldiers in a single unit which made it realistic to see a bunch of them die when getting attacked by another unit. In civ 6 you see 4 people, early on you could have 4 archers attack a unit with 1 soldier left, fire 30 arrows into it and it survives which doesn't make sense.
@@ironseguin9838, actually, I slightly disagree. Albeit I do not really like the little troops that it has on the sixth game, there are still some points to it. Because it has little as 4 troops means that it is weak and non-sensible, the units are seen as representations of bigger armies. Think of it like a chess piece. Say a pawn represents 500,000 men. Also, consider the bonuses that they have. Remember if they are located in rough terrain or smooth terrain, depending on their rank up, they have the upper hand over other troops like bowmen of 3 or 4. It all comes to the bonuses. Also, consider the bonuses like ranking up as a veteran in an army. That means they are stronger and more experienced than newly produced units.
if you actually pay attention it has WAY more attention to detail and depth, the shadows and lightning is insane and at maxed out the textures and detail are superb, the civ's look 10/10 and animations are also great, voice acting is even better with sean bean and the time cycle just tops that already great visual style with the biggest cherry possible. Everyone has right to their opinion but saying that civ5 has "better" graphics is just a plain lie, thereäs nothing disney at all about this and making a only slightly better civ5 with the same artstyle would just be boring, grow up people...
Why does Civ 6 look like a cheap IOS game with lazy cel-shaded graphics and even lazier animations? I was thinking about getting it, but nah I'm good with Civ 5 and the epic mods...
no, for such a complex and strategic game the art work is bad. Look at the tank, never seen something so cramped... As a kid I quit cartoons at around 7 or 8, and now I'm already developing intermediately made programs. Would you really expect any kid today to watch cartoons, nope, Netflix and TH-cam.
From what I could gather from this comment section, Civ 6 sucks because it reminded them of Clash of Clans. Really? Is that the main reason? I don't see anybody complaining about 6's gameplay. Rather, some people even thought it was better than 5's. I feel like 6 is getting too much hate for not enough reason.
You are just oversimplifying the arguments but yeah the game looks bad because they wanted to make it cross platform in order to make more money but the thing is you cant win a game in one sit or two sits in mobile anyway they were greedy with dlc s they fucked up the tile improvement system they fucked the movement system they fucked the military advancement progression added shitty mini-games for cultural victory didnt fixed any fucking issue with the civv like AI or combat maybe they just tried to make the game more accessible and completely ignored their already established fanbase for it and failed miserably. Is this enough reason to hate?
@@mi2420 Why should you be forced to play a game you have put hundreds of hours in because they developer decided to take a shit on you? More like go delete civ 5 and boycott 7.
arthegor the casus beli thing doesn't even work properly. Play on a high difficulty and within 20 turns two civs will attack you together calling it a "formal war" even though neither have denounced you. If a formal war can be declared by two people initiating a joint strike against you then that's my mistake but I'm pretty sure the only option for a formal war is if the person has denounced you or you them.
I used to play Civilization Revolution on the xbox 360 (which i loved) before i migrated to civ 5 on PC, so civ 6 was disappointing for me, as it looked visually to be taking a step backward.
Alexander Cummins This is exactly how i started off with civ on xbox, then civ 5 on PC, but i never baught civ 6 because no matter how great those animatilns are, the graphics are just plain horrible.
CIV VI graphic is far better then Pseudo 3D graphic on CIV V, maybe what you mean is art style. Civ VI has cartoon arts style but the graphic is fylly rendered 3D graphic. Unlike CIV V which has 3d/2d texture
Civ 6 as a whole appears to have taken the City concept more literally, while civ 5 took it to mean the capitals of the provinces. Thus, larger nuke explosions in 6.
When playing gathering storm at civ6's max potential you really get to appreciate the art style. CIV V is more rigid, and realistic looking. Realism is something we see every day though. I prefer Civ 6 because of the feel and depht of interaction, but civ 5 because of how much its grown off me. Playing civ 6 after a while the artstyle grows on you. Not all games are the same. Civ needed w change in color pallete anyways.
Civilization V "Fog of War" is better and wargame with cartoony graphics is not my option. I hope Civ VII comes more photorealistic and diplomacy is more like Europa universalis IV have.
Overall graphics are better, wtf. And the map spitted all over with sepia is shit IMHO. Btw theres lots of really bad animations that look cartoonish as heck in VI. Workers for example. And theres no balance in a VI at the moment. Though it costs like a V with all the DLC or even more. Now you have to wait several years for a finished game. Or just play V, its way better.
Well, for me I consider that the fifth is more realistic than the sixth delivery in the attack, the size of the map and is also very well detailed I thought that every time they released a delivery I thought that the map would be larger, more detailed and more realistic than their previous deliveries :( I hope the 7 is what I say
Something feels odd about Civ 6’s combat animations... At 3:16, it looks so stilted as they stand still and blast each other in the face. In Civ 5 melee units clashed and more modern units exchanged fire from realistic distances, like how the infantry shown earlier fire from their own tile rather than running up, shooting one by one point blank and fleeing. I don’t get it...
Civ V - Good Graphics, Good Controls, Unique Art, Good Combat, Good Nukes, F*ck Zulus Civ VI - Good Graphics, Good Controls, Unique Art, Good Combat, Good Nukes, F*ck Zulus
yes civ 5 looked better, but (in my personal opinion) civ 6 has a much better feel. Even with the combat, civ 5 had a bunch of people wave their weapons in each others faces until they fell down, but in civ 6 the combat animations just feel more...natural, almost brutal kind of fashion. The most notable difference is the presence and feel of nuclear weaponry. No contest
If someone could just merge CIV 5 graphics, civilization AI and citi-state function, with CIV 6 environmental features from gathering storm and governors, then I think it would be perfect. As is, I jump back in forth between both games, but CIV 5 reminds me the most of old CIV.. Hard to get into the CIV VI toon like appearance as much, but it is a good start for younger audiences.
I recently played civ vi foe the first time and didn't get brainwash by the popular opinion of hate toward VI. With that said, I personally didn't mind the graphics and even then, that's not enough to "ruin" a game. The gameplay itself felt much better than civ V, regarding complexity. There were more features to play upon, for the first time I could use AIs in diplomacy, espionage is much more interesting. Overall, the switch may take time (after all everyone has 500 hours on V), but I can see VI taking V's place for the next years as my grand mastermind world domination sim.
They jus got everything right in Civ 5. Civ 6 has some cool new ideas, like how leaders have agendas, adds a nice bit of depth/personality to the civs, but apart from that it all feels way too clunky, and because you can't annex cities, making a large empire is too much of a headache.
Civ5 might be more realistic when you compare graphics 6. But it's nowhere near realistic when you can build a single space rocket that wins you the game.
Depends on the nuke, like lets say the W-76. Hell no it wont blow up all of London but god damn will it hurt. now lets take the Tsar bomb the worlds largest detonated nuke and well, you might wana fix UK on the map because 1/15th or so of it will be missing. NO not all nukes are the same. but the common nuke in all arsenals would not take out all of London.
Civ 6 isn't as polished and refined as Civ 5 is, and that is only because Civ 5 has received many DLC and expansions to the game, while Civ 6 is still in a very raw state. It'll get better with time. just as Civ 5 did.
iSniped The cartoony terrain and stupid looking leaders won't though. And the AI probably won't improve much at all either. Those are the two biggest issues in my opinion...
how can this be fair you show many nukes from both games but when the units come you show modern VS modern in civ 5 but modern VS midal age units thats not fair at all even if it only is a ``comparison``.
As someone who has only played civ 6, I prefer civ 5 over civ 6 units but not because of the art style but mostly because of the amount of soldiers in a single unit. It looks like you're actually commanding a battalion of troops instead of civ 6's squadron of like 4 guys.
It would be really nice to see a mod that re-texures everything in VI to look like V, then again that must be hard to do, I'm not a modder so I wouldnt know.
Viperbreath 05 civ 5 looks ascetically more immersive and grounded that civ 6. civ 6 the rocket artillery projectile paths dont make sense, the a bomb explodes with the plane well into its radius and the units do a lot more scenematic crap like how the helicopter needs to go around in a full circle before moveing forewards. I really hate how civ 6 only has detail in the ooooo and aahhh momenents which makes me think it will die out quickly.
I personally love the Civ 6 graphics. The animations are great too, I love how a spearman will MK-style impale their enemy and slam them to the ground. Absolutely brutal.
Civ 5 animations looks so much better, but the sounds in Civ 6 are great. I love the sound of the nukes in Civ 6, but that's the only thing I think is better than Civ 5.
Amonny the districts add an spect of city planning that was not there in previous civ games. You can't just randomly click what you're city is building anymore.
Why so much hate for civ 6? I've played over 1000 hours of both and if you actually bother to play the game, you wouldn't be bitching about the graphics, that isn't what makes the game
I only played C6, but I'm not sure I want to start learning C5. I want to ask you as someone who knows both games well: I suffered a lot from slow moving units in C6, and suffered more from having to deal with the tedious internal affairs of the country, than to devote myself to enjoying foreign policy, Since you play the two games a lot, you must be well aware of what I suffer from. The question is, does the C5 game have the same problems that I mentioned? Thank you
Really, why all this bashing on Civilization VI? Does any of you played Civ V without expansions and DLC? In its initial release? It was one of the worst Civilization to date and most of the people were saying how they preferred Civ IV (With all expansions again) than Civ V (Without Expansions)... it was justified cause Civ V was just a skeleton of a game in it's release (No Religion?!). Although the new skeleton (no stacks of Doom) was better and so it grow to be better than it's predecessors. Now it's the same for VI...though it's not justified. Cause it's the best initial release of civilization until now! It's the first one that not only revolutionize like V (Unstacking Cities) but also having almost every feature of it's predecessors(with expansion) without expansions! So please be mature and stop talking about the unit graphics and clash of clans and see the essence of this game which is much more strategic and full in its release. It has the best skeleton to build upon. Also except units, which for the first time have different looks in different civilizations (without mods), the map and cities are gorgeous and much, much better than Civ V with it's chaotic and ugly architecture of super, one ultimate type cities and labyrinth of roads, simplistic wonders in wrong place (pyramids inside a frozen lake! :P ), with useless worker in every hex. P.S. If you learn to play with unstacked cities you can never go back to the old mess. Same as when we learnt to play with unstacked units we couldn't go back.
I have 260+ hours in Civ VI and V is objectively better. The graphics are cartoonish and overall worse than V, along with the animations. The constant need to make new builders is a pain, AND the addition of loyalty and era points adds unnecessary difficulty
superspeedish I think the graphics are fine. The main thing I miss is the large groups of soldiers that made up a unit. In Civ 6 there are only about 3 little soldiers per melee battalion, whereas is Civ 5 there were usually 10 or 12 which was cool.
Yeah i think the art style is great and with some tweaks could be something that will still look modern in years to come. I think the main issue is that people see it as a simplification rather than just a change to lengthen its lifespan and feel like they are being treated like kids.
God people are salty about Civ VI. I myself find the graphics to be very aesthetically pleasing. I like the cartoonish looks of say Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch. Cartoonish graphics age better IMHO. Just pick your preference and play whichever game you want. No need to insult poeple over a taste in video games.
I played 6 a few times and deleted it. 5 is much better game play. My experience with Sid Meyer games is that each new version is a little less enjoyable. Civilization 6 met my expectations. Still playing 5. Would really have to think about buying another one of Sid's games.
Comments section: "Civ V is better because of [insert completely subjective opinion here and state as fact]" "You're kidding?! Civ VI is better because of [insert completely subjective opinion here and state as fact]" Why are such are large minority of my fellow Civ players nowadays such pretentious fuckheads? lol
Civilization is becoming so dumbed down and cartoonish. I recall playing a bit of the 4th one, and it was ok (But being a history buff I found it quite absurd). But these newer ones are so arcade like. And even more absurd. Paradox Interactive's games look way better than these. They seem a lot more serious.
John Rambo parodox is dead serious when trying to make realistic stuff, or at least making history flow realistically. however civ is much more multiplsyer focused and easier to acess.
TheBraveGallade I can certainly see that. I do recall that Civilization 4 was a bit more serious than this game though. Just coming from my knowledge of social studies, the way the Civilization games function, i.e. tech, war, policies, etc, makes little to no sense. I kinda wish they would make each civ a lot more unique, as well as tech progression. But I doubt that will ever happen considering their increased arcade like gameplay.
Ivandagiant ' The fact that you have an urge to insult someone for no apparent reason makes me think you might be 12, or at least stupid in your own right.
And I remember playing the original Civilization on my Tandy computer. 2 hard drives for a total of 50Mb. Two 5.25 inch floppy drives. 4 Color video card and monitor. And to top it off a trackball.
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [2/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qJbQs_nhjD4/mqdefault.jpg)
Something I miss from civ v was how each unit was represented by ten or twelve troops (or five for cavalry). It really helped make you feel you had an army, rather than just a few squads and one or two cavalry (types) like in civ vi
It didnt feel like an army even with a mod that made the units more numerous and smaller
exactlyy!! totally agree
in civ 6 you can access it with mod
Yeah I agree. I played Civilization Revolution 2 and most of my units only have 1 to 3 people in it.
I don't like the art style of civ 6. It's a bit too cartoony for my tastes. The mobile artillery truck looks like something out of Disney Cars.
While I can agree that I liked CIV 5’s realistic art style, the colors in Civ6 just really make it better for me, so in 5 years when civ 7 comes out I hope they combine the petty colorful civ 6 with more of a civ 5 art style
@Fgg Fgg well at least look at the bright side, these cartoony graphics make it easier for the game to run on many computers, for example, my computer couldn't even load the civ 5 intro.
personally civ 5 just looks too dull which can make things look bland
Well as much as I kinda like cartoonish style in general... for game like Civilization the graphic from Civ5 is much more appealing to me too...
@Fgg Fgg try downloading the civ 5 environment skin mod from the civ 6 steam workshop. It changes civ 6 graphics to resemble civ 5.
civ 6 has cooler nukes but in my opinion thats all thats better than in civ 5
true
Napoleon Bonaparte the combat in general is looks better in my opinion
I like the districts as an idea. As a feature, they're not implemented very well though.
City state's are actually pretty useful, they give you delegates and units.
LuC1dCS //FUNNY VIDEOS AND MORE well... without city states it is actually imposible to diplomacy win in Civilization V
Civ 6 units look straight out of clash of clans
And the age off players off Civ compared to Clash off Clans?
Peter Magro I dont understand your question
GFSuperTrooper When you make a game for kids you make it look that way, when makinga game for old geezers you should not (10 year olds can never understand Civ anyway).
Peter Magro Im stating that the art style is similar to another game . A games art styling has nothing to do with its depth one could look at games like fallout and skyrim and see they are gritty in a way or tf2 which is cartoonish but then harken back to Civ Rev where the same art design is used as in this game. Im not questioning or defying depth by styling or graphics Im simply stating an observation.
GFSuperTrooper I am sure Civ 6 is a very deep and good game.
Civ5 is my favourite. Civ6 is certainly got beautiful, crisp graphics and I love the 'fog of war' map cartography but Civ6 is altogether too colourful and cartoony
you can use mods to use civ 5 graphics
Why do people think cartoon=bad , the word you're looking for is it looks animated it has some life to it
@@kringle7804 It breaks immersion. It feels like you're not playing a serious game.
just feels odd for the older game to look better
Dude shut the fuck UP civ 6 has a much BETTER feeling for example, in civ 5 once u create a builder you got that builder forever and u just got em raoming around him doing nothing and shit to summarzie extremely annoying, in civ 6 they fixed that shit. Another point the animations for example so MUCH BETTER dude that shit awesome. Also civilization 6 the new art style u just gotta deal with it. cartoon is IN these days so you better you get used t that hell even battle field 1 looks a little cartoonish.
i said nothing about play, i just meant graphics
Egrith lol i was drunk that night. Although in my opinion some people like cartoon style some don't that's just an opinion
"u just got em raoming around him doing nothing" if this is really your problem then you're fucking stupid... because you can DELETE HIM, get some money for that and subtract the per turn maintenance cost of the unit by doing that... this pretty much means any opinion you post here i have to ASSUME is wrong
so why don't armies do the same, just disappear after some uses? plus even so they will still last a few thousand or hundred years depending on era before being used too much.
really bothers me that they chose to do a cartoonish character designs. I thought they were gonna just make it like civ 5 graphics but even better. I still love the game. A retexture mod would be amazing. Atleast for the leaders
check out my game Hip Hop Block on App Store Pls dealing with the AI leaders in civ 6 is ridiculous. I've played many games and only once have I managed to make a declaration of friendship with another civ and then ally myself with them. If you spawn near France on a higher difficulty, she'll tell you that you should really start paying attention to the things going on around you then denounce you a turn later for being weak in espionage. Same goes for Rome, the AI start with 2 cities on higher difficulties so he'll ask if you are afraid of expansion then denounce you literally one turn later for not having any land. In civ 5 the only reason the AI would denounce you and act hostile toward you was if you were a real asshole. In civ 6, AI will ask you to help them attack another civ and as soon as the war is over, denounce you for being a warmonger because you accepted it. Half the time you get a formal war declared on you in the first 20 turns even if you haven't been denounced and then you kill off the two units the AI send and then they beg you to have mercy and give you a bunch of stuff for peace. Don't even get me started on how the leaders look, civ 5 was realistic with the leaders and they look like they had quite a bit of work put into them, civ 6 looks like someone drew the leaders with their eyes closed and then coloured it with crayons. The terrain doesn't even look realistic either, it's bright and colourful but civ 5 had the more real look to it and that's a big part of the reason people liked it. Civ 6 has been a major disappointment so far and I'm glad I didn't buy it but was able to play it anyway and see how it really is.
check out my game Hip Hop Block on App Store Pls Yeah, I only just convinced myself to get Civ VI on the Steam Summer sale today hoping the gameplay improvements could make up for the crap cartoony art style/graphics. The look of the terrain is a lot worse in VI (in my opinion), but the thing that really drives me crazy are the leaders. Gandhi looks like a deformed turtle man. And then to add insult to injury the AI is just as bad if not worse than in V. What were the devs thinking??
Well then just play Civ V. If you think that they are bad just don't play.
Ik I really thought they would keep it and the leaders, everything is a cartoon.
Civ V is a remake of civ III with pseudo-realistic design and civ VI is a remake of civ IV with cartoonish design. Originality is not a priority for firaxis it seems
I always love Civ V. It was pretty much the way I was introduction to this great game series. The beautiful graphics, the real texture and aesthetic was beautiful in my eyes. It is truly a hallmark of the series.
Civ VI, well, I had to let it grow on me. At first I was against it, seeing as it was so complicated and I couldn’t even win. Eventually, I learned how to win the game and I began to notice small details. The colorful scheme, the changing night and day, the beautiful wonder mini movies, even the graphics had a sort of charm. They popped out, and quite beautifully in my opinion. The crisp textures, the smooth lines and shading, it grew on me. The two games are both great, and beautiful in their own way. Civ V with its beautiful realistic graphics and Civ VI with its charming and bold look.
I agree with you.
I would never play Civ 5 if I never found the IGE
It’s so fun to secretly sabotage other players and frame them for random things while giving yourself infinite gold
civ 5 was more realistic and had better combat mechanics
christopher fisher civ vi combat is way better than v
opinions moron you know like uhhhhh yeah OPINIONS
@@mat8791 Honestly these arguments about which civilization game is the best just goes to show how great all of them are.
"realistic"...
yes yes yes
I prefere Civ 5 graphic but Nuke bomb is better in the 6.
Civ V is better.
Сiv II Beautiful and Interesting
102Funtik Civ II XD
agree
Civ II *was* and still is pretty awesome, tho. lol
Civ IV is even more better.
do Vehicles have to spin around everytime they attack
Consider it a tactical 360° turn to check for enemies from other directions
Comment of the year
“I successfully attacked a unit. I’ll do a victory dance.”
Se xy pfp, sl ut
This is the thing I hated about civ Vi....and also. I liked the artworks in Policy adoption interface of Civ V. Now in Civ VI all these civics are some small letters on some wired red,green or yellow cards
Civ 5 had interesting graphics overall for me, the leaders, the cities, battle animation, even when it got glitchy in longer games and larger maps (troops floating instead of walking or running on foot), but Civ 6 has better looking nukes and some battle animations like Swordsmen and catapult has better animation. In catapult, you can see the engineer placing the boulder after it's fired, same with Bazooka unit.
King_Oskar civ 5 had better animations, there were more soldiers in a single unit which made it realistic to see a bunch of them die when getting attacked by another unit. In civ 6 you see 4 people, early on you could have 4 archers attack a unit with 1 soldier left, fire 30 arrows into it and it survives which doesn't make sense.
@@ironseguin9838, actually, I slightly disagree. Albeit I do not really like the little troops that it has on the sixth game, there are still some points to it. Because it has little as 4 troops means that it is weak and non-sensible, the units are seen as representations of bigger armies. Think of it like a chess piece. Say a pawn represents 500,000 men. Also, consider the bonuses that they have. Remember if they are located in rough terrain or smooth terrain, depending on their rank up, they have the upper hand over other troops like bowmen of 3 or 4. It all comes to the bonuses. Also, consider the bonuses like ranking up as a veteran in an army. That means they are stronger and more experienced than newly produced units.
Civ 5 looks much, much better. Civ 6 looks like disney cartoon, very annoying
i almost used the same word ---Disney cartoon
KIT2142 yes you're right
Ya know it looks good,atleast for me,its relaxing,so you can use your calm and patience to conquer the world or get more farms,or maybe tech.
if you actually pay attention it has WAY more attention to detail and depth, the shadows and lightning is insane and at maxed out the textures and detail are superb, the civ's look 10/10 and animations are also great, voice acting is even better with sean bean and the time cycle just tops that already great visual style with the biggest cherry possible. Everyone has right to their opinion but saying that civ5 has "better" graphics is just a plain lie, thereäs nothing disney at all about this and making a only slightly better civ5 with the same artstyle would just be boring, grow up people...
+Kos Pw Triggered fanboi?
Why does Civ 6 look like a cheap IOS game with lazy cel-shaded graphics and even lazier animations? I was thinking about getting it, but nah I'm good with Civ 5 and the epic mods...
Civ 4 is better than all
because it is a cheap ios game
Just get Vox Populi for Civ V.
What is the best Civ5 mod? my personal favorite is Ingame Editor.
No shit. They released the entire game on iPad so your observation is fucking on point
Civ 6 is cartooniosh
A lot of people like cartoons. A shame you seemed to have missed out as a kid. XD
no, for such a complex and strategic game the art work is bad. Look at the tank, never seen something so cramped...
As a kid I quit cartoons at around 7 or 8, and now I'm already developing intermediately made programs. Would you really expect any kid today to watch cartoons, nope, Netflix and TH-cam.
I like the sound of the nuke in Civ 6... So powerful ^^
Filthy baguette!
Commander Shepard Je surrender !
ZeUltimateFrenchy lol
Commander Shepard hon hon hon
Gib Alsace-Lorraine
From what I could gather from this comment section, Civ 6 sucks because it reminded them of Clash of Clans.
Really? Is that the main reason? I don't see anybody complaining about 6's gameplay. Rather, some people even thought it was better than 5's. I feel like 6 is getting too much hate for not enough reason.
Almost like the video is about graphics comparison. Go to a mechanics comparison and the comments there will be about V having better mechanics.
You are just oversimplifying the arguments but yeah the game looks bad because they wanted to make it cross platform in order to make more money but the thing is you cant win a game in one sit or two sits in mobile anyway they were greedy with dlc s they fucked up the tile improvement system they fucked the movement system they fucked the military advancement progression added shitty mini-games for cultural victory didnt fixed any fucking issue with the civv like AI or combat maybe they just tried to make the game more accessible and completely ignored their already established fanbase for it and failed miserably. Is this enough reason to hate?
@@krkrbbr If you hate it that much go play civ 5 then.
@@mi2420 Why should you be forced to play a game you have put hundreds of hours in because they developer decided to take a shit on you? More like go delete civ 5 and boycott 7.
I'm sry to regret but I love Civ 5 more than CIV 6. Until now the only thing I love is the Casus Belli.
arthegor the casus beli thing doesn't even work properly. Play on a high difficulty and within 20 turns two civs will attack you together calling it a "formal war" even though neither have denounced you. If a formal war can be declared by two people initiating a joint strike against you then that's my mistake but I'm pretty sure the only option for a formal war is if the person has denounced you or you them.
Falcon AI mod, no more BS denouncing, friendly civs stay friendly
EU4 has better Casus bellis.
I used to play Civilization Revolution on the xbox 360 (which i loved) before i migrated to civ 5 on PC, so civ 6 was disappointing for me, as it looked visually to be taking a step backward.
Alexander Cummins This is exactly how i started off with civ on xbox, then civ 5 on PC, but i never baught civ 6 because no matter how great those animatilns are, the graphics are just plain horrible.
I still play Revolution all time! Classic!! The AI never gives you the same game..
From Civ 3 to Civ 4 I felt like the graphics went backwards xD
What many people seem to forget is Civ4. Ahh, the good old squares. But honestly, I've found personally civ 4 is the best
Even though I own civ6 I like how the units in civ5 are more realistically scaled and also city growth looks better
When i grow up with v , i prefer v
When i grow up with 6, i prefer vi
So just shut debate whois better
Civ 6 looks like a PlayStation 3 game , ill stick to Civ 5
Arnold Horvath When you have no money
When you only get games because of their graphics.
Sooner or later they must make a DLC or "toned down" look for Civ 6.
Then I'll buy it.. After all it is not a kids game- it just looks like it now...
CIV VI graphic is far better then Pseudo 3D graphic on CIV V, maybe what you mean is art style. Civ VI has cartoon arts style but the graphic is fylly rendered 3D graphic. Unlike CIV V which has 3d/2d texture
Who the fuck would play Civ because of the graphics?
Civ 6 as a whole appears to have taken the City concept more literally, while civ 5 took it to mean the capitals of the provinces. Thus, larger nuke explosions in 6.
Wow when you compare side by side it really makes the Civ 6 graphics look like crap. Civ 5 looks way better.
I've always thought the graphics were slightly worse in 5 becaUSE OF LOWER RES TEXTURES
whoops lol caps lock
@@SkyenNovaA You knoe, there's a thing called edit button.
When playing gathering storm at civ6's max potential you really get to appreciate the art style. CIV V is more rigid, and realistic looking. Realism is something we see every day though. I prefer Civ 6 because of the feel and depht of interaction, but civ 5 because of how much its grown off me.
Playing civ 6 after a while the artstyle grows on you. Not all games are the same. Civ needed w change in color pallete anyways.
When the footage switched to Civilization 6 I first thought I was looking at Civilization 4! lol!
civ 5 had better graphics but i dont get disappointed.bless you pirate bay
jack breh Graphics? You mean art style?
yes art style
Well, art style is based on personal preference so I can't say much about that.
agreed!
Wait, you can Pirate Bay civ 6??
Civilization V "Fog of War" is better and wargame with cartoony graphics is not my option. I hope Civ VII comes more photorealistic and diplomacy is more like Europa universalis IV have.
Well, about the fog of war you're right, I can't stand it, it doesn't look at all like a place you have explored
It seems that in Civ VI they were kind of lazy regarding animations. Civ V animations are way better despite the fact that overall graphics are not.
Overall graphics are better, wtf. And the map spitted all over with sepia is shit IMHO. Btw theres lots of really bad animations that look cartoonish as heck in VI. Workers for example.
And theres no balance in a VI at the moment. Though it costs like a V with all the DLC or even more. Now you have to wait several years for a finished game. Or just play V, its way better.
This should be called "Civ V and CIv VI graphic comparison even if Civ V was made 3 years ago"
uh... your thinking of Civ: Beyond Earth which came out in 2014 only 2 years ago. Civ V came out in 2010 practically 10 years ago like Yalp said.
¨6 years* sorry :/
civ 5 look better imo
10 years ago bud... cuz I like to stretch time out. And in 3 years time, Yalp and I will have the fortune of being correct for 365 days.
@@vysearcadia522 you have 346 days before your statement is outdated
It was nice of you to start the video with a tribute to Gandhi.
Well, for me I consider that the fifth is more realistic than the sixth delivery in the attack, the size of the map and is also very well detailed I thought that every time they released a delivery I thought that the map would be larger, more detailed and more realistic than their previous deliveries :( I hope the 7 is what I say
idk I think civ 5 is better than 6
why?
Something feels odd about Civ 6’s combat animations...
At 3:16, it looks so stilted as they stand still and blast each other in the face.
In Civ 5 melee units clashed and more modern units exchanged fire from realistic distances, like how the infantry shown earlier fire from their own tile rather than running up, shooting one by one point blank and fleeing.
I don’t get it...
Civ V - Good Graphics, Good Controls, Unique Art, Good Combat, Good Nukes, F*ck Zulus
Civ VI - Good Graphics, Good Controls, Unique Art, Good Combat, Good Nukes, F*ck Zulus
Wait! Am I one of the few that actually likes CIV VI's art style?
You're not alone. I find Civ 5's leader scenes to be bland and rigid myself.
No man, i like that they didn't make it more photorealistic. I see realism everyday.
same, I like civ 6 better than civ 5 artstyle
I have absolutely no problem with it. As far as the game itself, I still prefer Civ5, but probably cuz I'm used to it and only started playing civ6.
I like it too, but it definitely looks like we're in the minority :P
civ vi aka clash of clans
you know, i was like i've seen this kind of graphics before, so yeah it really looks alike
that could not be less accurate
more like clash of civs
ThatRandomDude Indeed! haha
My thoughts exactly
Civ 6 is just a little too cartoony for me tbh
I like the design of civ 5 much more
yes civ 5 looked better, but (in my personal opinion) civ 6 has a much better feel. Even with the combat, civ 5 had a bunch of people wave their weapons in each others faces until they fell down, but in civ 6 the combat animations just feel more...natural, almost brutal kind of fashion. The most notable difference is the presence and feel of nuclear weaponry. No contest
Ah yes, those flashes of light and explosions when two groups of warriors hit each other with maces as big as humans...
That is like 1% of the game...
Swordsman stabbing and lifting other swordsman with one arm while doing a flip is not very realistic
Alex Khan quick combat good sir
If someone could just merge CIV 5 graphics, civilization AI and citi-state function, with CIV 6 environmental features from gathering storm and governors, then I think it would be perfect. As is, I jump back in forth between both games, but CIV 5 reminds me the most of old CIV.. Hard to get into the CIV VI toon like appearance as much, but it is a good start for younger audiences.
I bought Civilization 6 just recently and after many years of playing Civilization 5 I cant describe how disappointed I am in Civ 6.
3:15, that guy just sorta takes a musketshot to the face and says, "Nope."
2:20 The whole thing looks so cartoony.
the whole game's graphic looks too much cartoony, i think. Unfortunately, the realism of animation has deteriorate. That's sad...
Civ 5 looked way better, and I wish that the corps/armies ability was like civ revolution
Mike, get your ass back in Planetside! ;P
@@LCInfantry speak for yourself LOL, where u been
I recently played civ vi foe the first time and didn't get brainwash by the popular opinion of hate toward VI. With that said, I personally didn't mind the graphics and even then, that's not enough to "ruin" a game. The gameplay itself felt much better than civ V, regarding complexity.
There were more features to play upon, for the first time I could use AIs in diplomacy, espionage is much more interesting.
Overall, the switch may take time (after all everyone has 500 hours on V), but I can see VI taking V's place for the next years as my grand mastermind world domination sim.
The game itself is actually pretty good, a lot of people just hop on the bandwagon saying they hate civ VI.
@@ignasjazbutis3643 I love civilization 6 but I love civilization 5 more. Civilization 5 is a better game but that doesnt mean Civilization 6 is bad
They jus got everything right in Civ 5. Civ 6 has some cool new ideas, like how leaders have agendas, adds a nice bit of depth/personality to the civs, but apart from that it all feels way too clunky, and because you can't annex cities, making a large empire is too much of a headache.
well it looks like I'm sticking to Civ 4
Imagine if they added total war's rts battles to the civ franchise = best game ever
Yeah right my impossible dream too
civ 5 is so much better... I'm so disappointed cause I was looking forward to civ 6 :( definitely not worth $35 IMO
actualy it is worth lul
@@heroninja1125 why?
because of the art style? seriously?
For me I have
400 hours on Civ5
6 hours on Civ6
I think I know which game I prefer haha
BECAUSE YOU ONLY PLAYED 6 HOURS DUMBFUCK
Many parts of civ 6 are better than 5 but overall 5 wins all day and that's because the artistic style of 6 has gone in the opposite direction.
Looking at them back to back like this... fuck civ 6 is so ugly.
6= better graphics
5= more realistic
Civ5 might be more realistic when you compare graphics 6. But it's nowhere near realistic when you can build a single space rocket that wins you the game.
With more realistic I was talking about the general feel of the game. Not about the science victory... But I get your point
graphics doesnt count in a game like this. Both are insanely good games in my opininon
That's just your opinion. Graphics count in every game imo
HeeftGedaan HD well then Civ 6 is horrible.
I was hoping for more than just some war clips but it looks like 5 has graphic style while 6 has sound and animation
civ 5 nuke bomb look like a joke
I love civ 6 nuke, now thats a real nuke war
Yeah, it nuked the shit out of my FPS :(
Huh? It looked more than fine to me.
actually civ 5 nuke bomb is more realistic. nukes can do a lot of damage, but they can't completely destroy an extremly big city, like ny or london
Matheus Torres actually they can
Depends on the nuke, like lets say the W-76. Hell no it wont blow up all of London but god damn will it hurt. now lets take the Tsar bomb the worlds largest detonated nuke and well, you might wana fix UK on the map because 1/15th or so of it will be missing.
NO not all nukes are the same. but the common nuke in all arsenals would not take out all of London.
Civ 6 isn't as polished and refined as Civ 5 is, and that is only because Civ 5 has received many DLC and expansions to the game, while Civ 6 is still in a very raw state. It'll get better with time. just as Civ 5 did.
iSniped The cartoony terrain and stupid looking leaders won't though. And the AI probably won't improve much at all either. Those are the two biggest issues in my opinion...
The only reasonable comment around here.
iSniped well we are still waiting
still waiting .......
Gathering Strom's looking to be pretty hype
how can this be fair you show many nukes from both games but when the units come you show modern VS modern in civ 5 but modern VS midal age units thats not fair at all even if it only is a ``comparison``.
As someone who has only played civ 6, I prefer civ 5 over civ 6 units but not because of the art style but mostly because of the amount of soldiers in a single unit. It looks like you're actually commanding a battalion of troops instead of civ 6's squadron of like 4 guys.
It would be really nice to see a mod that re-texures everything in VI to look like V, then again that must be hard to do, I'm not a modder so I wouldnt know.
That exists, im not sure if you know that already by now.
I hate this spinning unit animation of Civ6 so much. Every attack is "You spin me right round baby".
The cartoonish graphic is disgusting. So goes with StarCraft II
i personally love the Artstyle... just because Zelda: Twilight Princess is more realistic and Wind Waker is cartoony doesn't mean it's a bad game.
Civ 5 looked genuinely good for its time.
Civ 6 looks like an iPad game / like it's made for schoolkids.
whoops...
The missile cruiser in Civ 6 isn't even a missile cruiser... it's a bloody corvette.
Civ 6 art style seems like a joke. I'll stick to civ 5. I even downloaded the mod that makes civ 5 even more realistic by enlarging unit scale
CIV 5 is SO much better. Hoping CIV 7 will build on that game instead of 6th version.
Civ 6 looks like ass
Viperbreath 05 civ 5 looks ascetically more immersive and grounded that civ 6. civ 6 the rocket artillery projectile paths dont make sense, the a bomb explodes with the plane well into its radius and the units do a lot more scenematic crap like how the helicopter needs to go around in a full circle before moveing forewards. I really hate how civ 6 only has detail in the ooooo and aahhh momenents which makes me think it will die out quickly.
John Appleseed why people are hating civ 6 only by graphics? Its a good game (only ai sucks) what matters is the gameplay
1:28 Prague nukes Kabul ... only in Civilization xD
prague owned by japan
I personally love the Civ 6 graphics. The animations are great too, I love how a spearman will MK-style impale their enemy and slam them to the ground. Absolutely brutal.
Civ 5 animations looks so much better, but the sounds in Civ 6 are great. I love the sound of the nukes in Civ 6, but that's the only thing I think is better than Civ 5.
Now CIv 6 Look like Extended Episode of Boob the Builder Cartoon .Who ever Made the Decision need to be fired
There's a mod that lets you build different nuclear ICBMs based on their size(e.g. 9mt, 500kt, etc.)
I hate the cartoon graphics of civ 6, its really deterred me from buying it
3:16
"BITCH I'M BULLET PROOF!" - That one musketman
Civ VI looks just comical
Honestly they're both good but w/ different themes.
I like the civ6 style overall, but I'll sure miss those pretty Leopard2A5 MBT models around the map.
u dont like T-90?
Dario Vlaar
I'm pretty sure Civ 6 has a reactive armor abrams as MBT, but I didn't reach MBTs myself, just saw on videos. I like the T-90 a lot.
actually it is an upgraded t80
Broflovski who cares
3:15 This is how you fight. Shrug off a head shot with no sweat and forward to kill two enemies. This is MADNESS.
Civ 5 still better. Civ 6 for 12 years of kids.
in terms of graphics, very much yes. In terms of gameplay, civ 6 very much improved.
Improved=simplified? The districts are a mess and the tech tree is much smaller.
Kür Şad r u sure a 12 years kid can play civ?
Amonny the districts add an spect of city planning that was not there in previous civ games. You can't just randomly click what you're city is building anymore.
Districts aren't a mess. Actually plan where they go and what you do with them, then reap the rewards.
I was so excited the first time I dropped a nuke in civ 5 then I felt like I did something terribly wrong
ooo gandhi loves new nuke effects
Why so much hate for civ 6? I've played over 1000 hours of both and if you actually bother to play the game, you wouldn't be bitching about the graphics, that isn't what makes the game
james Clarke finally someone who understand games, looks like the majority of the hate Civ 6 is only by graphics :/
I only played C6, but I'm not sure I want to start learning C5. I want to ask you as someone who knows both games well: I suffered a lot from slow moving units in C6, and suffered more from having to deal with the tedious internal affairs of the country, than to devote myself to enjoying foreign policy, Since you play the two games a lot, you must be well aware of what I suffer from. The question is, does the C5 game have the same problems that I mentioned? Thank you
I will admit Civ 6 is my first civilization experience and I love it. It’s one of the most in depth games. I’ve never seen weather effects in civ 5
The reason why civ 6 exists is to sell all the dlc again.
Really, why all this bashing on Civilization VI? Does any of you played Civ V without expansions and DLC? In its initial release? It was one of the worst Civilization to date and most of the people were saying how they preferred Civ IV (With all expansions again) than Civ V (Without Expansions)... it was justified cause Civ V was just a skeleton of a game in it's release (No Religion?!). Although the new skeleton (no stacks of Doom) was better and so it grow to be better than it's predecessors.
Now it's the same for VI...though it's not justified. Cause it's the best initial release of civilization until now! It's the first one that not only revolutionize like V (Unstacking Cities) but also having almost every feature of it's predecessors(with expansion) without expansions!
So please be mature and stop talking about the unit graphics and clash of clans and see the essence of this game which is much more strategic and full in its release. It has the best skeleton to build upon.
Also except units, which for the first time have different looks in different civilizations (without mods), the map and cities are gorgeous and much, much better than Civ V with it's chaotic and ugly architecture of super, one ultimate type cities and labyrinth of roads, simplistic wonders in wrong place (pyramids inside a frozen lake! :P ), with useless worker in every hex.
P.S. If you learn to play with unstacked cities you can never go back to the old mess. Same as when we learnt to play with unstacked units we couldn't go back.
even without expansions moving from a realistic style to cartoony was just a bad move.
I have 260+ hours in Civ VI and V is objectively better. The graphics are cartoonish and overall worse than V, along with the animations. The constant need to make new builders is a pain, AND the addition of loyalty and era points adds unnecessary difficulty
Civ 5 is better. The AI in 6 is unstable af. I got denounced for not having enough spies in the ancient era 😂
I just don't get it. Why all the graphics hate? It's at least something that will stand out a few years later rather than show its age.
superspeedish I think the graphics are fine. The main thing I miss is the large groups of soldiers that made up a unit. In Civ 6 there are only about 3 little soldiers per melee battalion, whereas is Civ 5 there were usually 10 or 12 which was cool.
Yeah i think the art style is great and with some tweaks could be something that will still look modern in years to come. I think the main issue is that people see it as a simplification rather than just a change to lengthen its lifespan and feel like they are being treated like kids.
I think they had more people per unit in Civ V, because there was only one unit per tile, whereas in Civ VI you can build up corps and armies. ;)
God people are salty about Civ VI. I myself find the graphics to be very aesthetically pleasing. I like the cartoonish looks of say Team Fortress 2 and Overwatch. Cartoonish graphics age better IMHO. Just pick your preference and play whichever game you want. No need to insult poeple over a taste in video games.
Civ6 is a joke
YOU are the joke
Rammus not me. Civ6
Nope,Civ6 is a game not a joke
Jokes are very diferent,they don't have visuals or gameplay
@@joj1560 ok karen
Civ 6 has better graphics due to it having better reflections and effects and that. But i think Civilization 5 has a better art style.
Civ 5 Better
I played 6 a few times and deleted it. 5 is much better game play. My experience with Sid Meyer games is that each new version is a little less enjoyable. Civilization 6 met my expectations. Still playing 5. Would really have to think about buying another one of Sid's games.
Comments section:
"Civ V is better because of [insert completely subjective opinion here and state as fact]"
"You're kidding?! Civ VI is better because of [insert completely subjective opinion here and state as fact]"
Why are such are large minority of my fellow Civ players nowadays such pretentious fuckheads? lol
lol why are people disliking the video? The guy just compared unit animations from different games
Civilization is becoming so dumbed down and cartoonish. I recall playing a bit of the 4th one, and it was ok (But being a history buff I found it quite absurd). But these newer ones are so arcade like. And even more absurd.
Paradox Interactive's games look way better than these. They seem a lot more serious.
John Rambo
parodox is dead serious when trying to make realistic stuff, or at least making history flow realistically. however civ is much more multiplsyer focused and easier to acess.
TheBraveGallade I can certainly see that. I do recall that Civilization 4 was a bit more serious than this game though.
Just coming from my knowledge of social studies, the way the Civilization games function, i.e. tech, war, policies, etc, makes little to no sense.
I kinda wish they would make each civ a lot more unique, as well as tech progression. But I doubt that will ever happen considering their increased arcade like gameplay.
John Rambo
Civ 6 seems to go up it complexity without losing civ 5s populartis so...
+John Rambo are you 12? Sounds like you are from /r/iamverysmart
Ivandagiant ' The fact that you have an urge to insult someone for no apparent reason makes me think you might be 12, or at least stupid in your own right.
And I remember playing the original Civilization on my Tandy computer.
2 hard drives for a total of 50Mb. Two 5.25 inch floppy drives. 4 Color video card and monitor. And to top it off a trackball.
Dat face on 0:44
The civ 6 nukes feel a little cartoony to me. I still prefer civ 5 in almost every single way.
Everybody is going to hate me but I think Civ VI is way better.
Well, I prefer Civ V but I respect you, after all Civ VI is supposed to be better
I prefer civ 5 and civ 6 at the same time
Then you don't prefer either...