🔴Subscribe - a new Godot mega tutorial is coming very soon 🔴 I'm still planning to do do both Godot and Unity content. Knowing feature set of more than one engine gives a way more flexibility when learning.
I think its a good move and I will stay with Unity since I will never pass the 1M threshold , and honestly if I will make over 1M it will be much cheaper than Unreal. But unfortunately due to the previous TOS and what happened with Unity in the last 2 weeks, we can't trust Unity in 100% and I will definitely learn Godot/Monogame in my spare time to have peace in mind. BTW the editing in the video are amazing
I'm reading a lot about Godot scalability for larger games. Now I am worried I should migrate to Unreal. But also, now I think I should make the game in Godot as a prototype and wait to see where it's limits are. I don't see Godot going anywhere, and it is functioning as a great prototyper for any of the other engines if it some-how can't achieve parity with them.
This isn't the first time John Riccitiello made a bonehead move and Unity had to come out and apologize. It's just the biggest one yet. If you think John Riccitiello is already planning another predatory scheme you are being naive. You can not trust Unity with John at the helm. He was fired from EA because he was so bad at his job. How or why he was hired to run Unity is mind boggling.
@@Peak_Stone "I don't see Godot going anywhere" You didn't even know about Godot till recently, the engine has more than a decade of work on it, and it gets expanded day by day. Honestly you should stay with unity, you seem to be the kind of close minded user they want.
I'm sorry but that feels like that one psychological trick where you give someone a really bad option then a less bad option, and people gladly take the less bad one.
Yep, 5 steps over the line, 2 steps back, straight out of the EA play book. I'm going to continue learning UE5 and Godot. Fortunately, I am only in the planning stage of my next project, so I can take extra time planning while I learn the new game engines.
I address that above. It's the "battered spouse," syndrome. People who have already committed and built their life around Unity will apologize and make excuses for its abusive behavior. This isn't the first time John Riccitiello made a bonehead move and Unity had to come out and apologize. It's just the biggest one yet. If you think John Riccitiello is already planning another predatory scheme you are being naive. You can not trust Unity with John at the helm. He was fired from EA because he was so bad at his job. How or why he was hired to run Unity is mind boggling.
@@starvr I am in the same boat. Unity was my first game engine, but I started learning Unreal and Godot alongside it a couple of years ago , Unreal because the unity render pipeline stuff, and the availability of assets. But both those engines take a while to load up, and Godot is just so much easier to use. C# is also a challenge for new developers. The language is probably great but once you start learning about events and delgates, you wonder what you initially wanted to do, which is to make games. Also, having events built right into Godot saved me from doing endless hours of research into C# specific features, which ends up in a rabbit hole. I specifically left Unity because I found it a big hurdle to deal with events and I knew that Godot had events built in. For new developers, new to coding, Godot is the best engine by far. Once you crack it, release a decent game, then you should consider your next game on one of the other engines. The game programming patterns transfer over, and It is so much easier to piece the patterns together in Godot, because the whole interface is focused on making the game. You dont have to go sighing up and downloading external editors, worrying about licensing, having more stuff than you know what to do with - it just sends off learnign about stuff that isn't to do with logic.
@@bezoro-personal How so? The fee is still there. And what stops them from chaning their mind again in a few years? And pretty much all the indie game devs I follow that use Unity and have a popular game (Namely Shadows of Doubt devs and Phasmaphobia devs) have basically said "we hate this decision but we're stuck with Unity because we'd have to rebuild our game from the ground up, but we won't use Unity for our next project". Unity is dead and will not survive the next few years. No major developer like Nintendo or Microsoft will go along with this, and the indie scene is vaporizing before their eyes.
Short answer, yes. It's not install Fees its Runtime Fees. Long answer: If you exceed 200k you need to upgrade to Unity Pro which costs around $2,000. If your game exceeds $1,000,000 AND 1,000,000 "initial engagements" then you need to start paying Runtime Fees.
Hi I hope this can be answered. I just saw a video where a dev made profits from making a game and i'm wondering. what if a dev made like millions in the first year like maybe 2M and then the proceeding year got just a constant average of 100-200k. obviously he will have to pay unity of either a flat amount or a runtime fee, will he/she have to pay that fee every month forever or just the months or years where he reached the unity's threshold of paying a fee? Idk if my question makes sense but im hoping for an answer. thanks
My gut feel is that them walking this back has taken them from "trust damaged and new structure is unreasonable", to "trust damage, but new structure is reasonable". There will be a lot more people finishing their current Unity projects than before (where most people were looking at porting the game over to a different engine), but with Unity damaging their community's trust so much, I have no doubt that when people need to start new projects, they'll be looking at different engines instead of Unity. If they've tried to do these scummy changes once, they'll do it again.
@CocoCode what do you mean by revenue? revenue from the game of a company? I have LLC that have revenue more than 100k from other activities(none game related), does that counts?
@@Gupatik Godot is built in C++. GDScript compiles into a lower level language, so the performance hit is minimal. (GDScript writes almost like Python). However, Godot does have a version that supports C# if you would like to use it or if your more comfortable using it. It's all explained in more detail on their website.
Thankyou for breaking down the new fees, Hey Coco can you please do a video on ironsource ad setup for both under 13's and over 13's all the tutorials only do it for over 13.
For now... I think that may be the prevailing stance of a lot of people. This news is good news, but the fact that the entire community had to go into an uproar in order for these changes to happen, is sad; It was totally unnecesary. These better terms shoud've been what happened originally.
Hang on a minute! So people are leaving Unity because of the runtime fee, and the runtime fee can only apply if you MAKE over $1 million (self-reported)! My God! Most indie devs won't even cross $200,000 in revenue. I wonder what the fuss is about.
5 months later, and I can definitely tell you that most of the people who are against unity after the changes don’t really understand what they are and how they would (or wouldn’t) be affected. Personally, I think the engine is better than before and Unity is showing clear effort to listen to the community. People are acting quite entitled for some reason.
So now they're totally removed download fee? And also you will don't have any fees in free version? And I want to start learning how to make games so in my situation should I teach unity or godot?
I believe you might have missed some points from the video; The installation fee is still present but applies only if you earn >1M$ in the last 12 months and had more than 1M downloads of your game. Feel free to learn both engines, in my opinion, for the very start Godot is a good option
@@CocoCode Thank you for that answer. I was unsure what it all meant. Just ONE question that scares me. Is there any risk regarding Unitys payments, that makes you go bankrupt? Can my bank account go "minus" because of downloads and installs or anything else? I´m one of those who doesn´t quite understand math and numbers. //
This Splash Screen idea is smart move. I don't know what to do! Splash Screens are for noobies. Plus its better to stay with older version to avoid price fee!!
Dude Its Million Dollar Per Game!! TH-camrs Are Just Trying To Get Subscribers and More Attention. If My Game is A Million Dollar, I will Delete It From Store and Problem Solved LOL.@@farou5736
Yes since all their models are revenue based. If you make any money out of them, then eventually you will hit the $200k mark for the Unity pro subscription, or the $1m AND 1m downloads for the runtime fee.
Did they nix the software that tracks installs? The privacy concerns around that retroactive installs really has me concerned for user's privacy. Add they deleted the TOS clause and suddenly put it back today doesn't make things better lol. Still planning on finishing my current project in Unity, but moving to Open Source. I can't trust my passion to a company that just nuke it whenever they decide it makes their shareholders more money.
@@CocoCode That is fine but did they answer the question on HOW they were going to have Unity phone home on older builds unless some form of code was already embedded into current software to track installs? What is that software, do you know? Ironsource's former reputation gives me pause when they suddenly dropped that information.
As stated in the video, the runtime fee does not apply to the older game builds (builded using LTS 2022 or lower), so they do not need to track anything. On newer builds (using LTS 2023 or newer) you will need to report your install/purchase data to Unity directly. Of course that doesn't eliminate any other unanswered questions and reputation breach.
I guess they’re trying to lore people in to pay more money by removing the decade old, infamous splashscreen requirement. These new Unity games will be interesting.
It's too late. Even if the new pricing seem like a better deal (it's still crap) I just don't trust them anymore because it doesn't change the fact that Unity has become a spyware to deliver Ads and collect as much user data as possible and I hate it. Their goal is clear: Get installed on as many smartphone as possible, collect user data, deliver ads. Also, the runtime fee is still a completely arbitrary "trust me bro" metric, no company in there right mind would be okay with such a deal. I was fortunate enough to only be at the very start of my project, this way migrating to Unreal isn't too much of a problem. I hope others will find good alternatives to Unity as well.
It's still totally unclear who needs a pro license - are those 200k counted per company revenue or per game? Traditionally it's been per company, the new stuff seem to be all per game. Now plus is gone an no one in the universe knows what the 200k means 🤷♂️
How's it unclear? If you make over a million dollars on one of your games, get pro. Check out the calculater they provide on their FAQ. It literally couldn't be clearer.
@@globes179 Are you saying they're moving from looking at you're company's total revenue to now counting the profits of each individual game the company is making? That is certainly the way we all would like it to be - it's also not the way it's been historically though.
Looking at the online calculator they provided it's clear they're still going by company revenue unfortunately. I would have loved to see what you described though.
I'm glad Unity changed that because I really love Unity and didn't want to switch to another engine. I understand that Unity needs more money to improve their product so I totally accept this new policy but it's a shame they didn't do this right away which made them lose trust and a pretty big part of their users.
In order to force developers to 2023 LTS, 2022 LTS will be a shitty version? New Splash Screen thing is only on 2023 LTS, you still need a Pro lisense to get ride of it on 2022 LTS. The real question is: What is the next shit that come form the CEO and when.
They keep the runtime fee for new versions, but that requires them to correctly identify the Unity version a game is made with. If that identification fails, for instance with hacked pirated copies, devs could face bankruptcy.
Godot is free, GameMaker charges $9.99 per month for mobile and desktop builds. I think, with 2D games, devs will pick one of these options, whereas Unreal Engine will be the primary alternative to Unity with 3D games. Any hobbyist / beginner who still picks Unity is completely naive.
A bit harsh to say that would be naive. You can still use Unity in a non-comercial way. I learned a lot about game design from Unity, and each engine has their own "systems" that may show you a different way to think about engine design. After using Unity for 5 years, I am way more confident in potentially making my own engine, or eventually transitioning to another one. I think it's still worth looking at Unity as a option for getting into game development, but I can agree that doing a large scale project in Unity right now is not a good idea.
Unity has a real chance here to learn from their mistake and just take a huge lead over everyone else. I think they might do it. The nay-sayers and emotional complainers will never stop doing their thing, but so far, this is a huge step in the right direction.
@@TheyBroughtBackStupidHandles What you don't understand is you start paying runtime fees if you make revenue of $ 1,000,000 in the last 12 months. Realistically, this applies only to a select few game studios. Please be realistic. I wonder if I'm the only poor soul on TH-cam comments.
🔴Subscribe - a new Godot mega tutorial is coming very soon 🔴
I'm still planning to do do both Godot and Unity content. Knowing feature set of more than one engine gives a way more flexibility when learning.
Hey, what if I use Unity 2023.1.15f1 (non-LTS) ?
I cannot find answers :(
This is the best and cleanest explanation so far. Thanks for uploading this!
Great video! Thanks for the info.
Excellent coverage in a pretty package. Thanks, Coco
This is the video I was looking for. Thanks!
Your videos have very good editing. Even an informative video about recent news is incredibly well edited. Thanks!
I appreciate that! ✨
I think its a good move and I will stay with Unity since I will never pass the 1M threshold , and honestly if I will make over 1M it will be much cheaper than Unreal.
But unfortunately due to the previous TOS and what happened with Unity in the last 2 weeks, we can't trust Unity in 100% and I will definitely learn Godot/Monogame in my spare time to have peace in mind.
BTW the editing in the video are amazing
I'm reading a lot about Godot scalability for larger games. Now I am worried I should migrate to Unreal. But also, now I think I should make the game in Godot as a prototype and wait to see where it's limits are. I don't see Godot going anywhere, and it is functioning as a great prototyper for any of the other engines if it some-how can't achieve parity with them.
This isn't the first time John Riccitiello made a bonehead move and Unity had to come out and apologize. It's just the biggest one yet. If you think John Riccitiello is already planning another predatory scheme you are being naive. You can not trust Unity with John at the helm. He was fired from EA because he was so bad at his job. How or why he was hired to run Unity is mind boggling.
@@Peak_Stone
"I don't see Godot going anywhere"
You didn't even know about Godot till recently, the engine has more than a decade of work on it, and it gets expanded day by day.
Honestly you should stay with unity, you seem to be the kind of close minded user they want.
@@jonatanrobledo9812nobody can wait 50 years for develop godot 😂
You the same Peak Stone from VRchat?
I'm sorry but that feels like that one psychological trick where you give someone a really bad option then a less bad option, and people gladly take the less bad one.
Yep, 5 steps over the line, 2 steps back, straight out of the EA play book. I'm going to continue learning UE5 and Godot. Fortunately, I am only in the planning stage of my next project, so I can take extra time planning while I learn the new game engines.
I address that above. It's the "battered spouse," syndrome. People who have already committed and built their life around Unity will apologize and make excuses for its abusive behavior. This isn't the first time John Riccitiello made a bonehead move and Unity had to come out and apologize. It's just the biggest one yet. If you think John Riccitiello is already planning another predatory scheme you are being naive. You can not trust Unity with John at the helm. He was fired from EA because he was so bad at his job. How or why he was hired to run Unity is mind boggling.
@@starvr I am in the same boat. Unity was my first game engine, but I started learning Unreal and Godot alongside it a couple of years ago , Unreal because the unity render pipeline stuff, and the availability of assets. But both those engines take a while to load up, and Godot is just so much easier to use. C# is also a challenge for new developers. The language is probably great but once you start learning about events and delgates, you wonder what you initially wanted to do, which is to make games. Also, having events built right into Godot saved me from doing endless hours of research into C# specific features, which ends up in a rabbit hole.
I specifically left Unity because I found it a big hurdle to deal with events and I knew that Godot had events built in.
For new developers, new to coding, Godot is the best engine by far. Once you crack it, release a decent game, then you should consider your next game on one of the other engines. The game programming patterns transfer over, and It is so much easier to piece the patterns together in Godot, because the whole interface is focused on making the game. You dont have to go sighing up and downloading external editors, worrying about licensing, having more stuff than you know what to do with - it just sends off learnign about stuff that isn't to do with logic.
Considering that the new system is better than the old one that idea makes no sense.
@@bezoro-personal How so? The fee is still there. And what stops them from chaning their mind again in a few years? And pretty much all the indie game devs I follow that use Unity and have a popular game (Namely Shadows of Doubt devs and Phasmaphobia devs) have basically said "we hate this decision but we're stuck with Unity because we'd have to rebuild our game from the ground up, but we won't use Unity for our next project".
Unity is dead and will not survive the next few years. No major developer like Nintendo or Microsoft will go along with this, and the indie scene is vaporizing before their eyes.
so for unity personal, if you make less than 200k in 2024 version, you don't need to pay install fees?
Less than 200k is free always. All versions
Short answer, yes. It's not install Fees its Runtime Fees.
Long answer:
If you exceed 200k you need to upgrade to Unity Pro which costs around $2,000. If your game exceeds $1,000,000 AND 1,000,000 "initial engagements" then you need to start paying Runtime Fees.
how are your videos so clean :O
Perfectionism and sleepless nights 😮💨
Hi I hope this can be answered. I just saw a video where a dev made profits from making a game and i'm wondering. what if a dev made like millions in the first year like maybe 2M and then the proceeding year got just a constant average of 100-200k. obviously he will have to pay unity of either a flat amount or a runtime fee, will he/she have to pay that fee every month forever or just the months or years where he reached the unity's threshold of paying a fee? Idk if my question makes sense but im hoping for an answer. thanks
My gut feel is that them walking this back has taken them from "trust damaged and new structure is unreasonable", to "trust damage, but new structure is reasonable".
There will be a lot more people finishing their current Unity projects than before (where most people were looking at porting the game over to a different engine), but with Unity damaging their community's trust so much, I have no doubt that when people need to start new projects, they'll be looking at different engines instead of Unity. If they've tried to do these scummy changes once, they'll do it again.
@@WyMustIGo
Didn't know unity had defendbots too.
Do they pay you by the hour, or per comment?
Who's kid is this?
*When will these changes take effect?*
Great video!
Thank you for the clarification, but the music is quite loud. I hope you can address this in the future.
Thank you for the feedback!
Will you still be making godot tutorials and videos as well or will you just stick to Unity?
Splash screen should not be an embarrassment
My first project in Godot will have a "not made in Unity " splash screen lol.
@@therinwhitten do it
Which game engine you use now.
Unity ofc
still Unity. Still has no strong reason to move. It will be different story if you ask me two years from now 😂
@CocoCode what do you mean by revenue? revenue from the game of a company?
I have LLC that have revenue more than 100k from other activities(none game related), does that counts?
Any news on the "have to be connected to the internet" thing?
I think I'll stay on the old version
I going to stay with my transition to godot. seems the engine is powerful and going to upgrade more and more
I'm really scared of that godot script language if it is powerful enough like c#
@@Gupatik Godot is built in C++. GDScript compiles into a lower level language, so the performance hit is minimal. (GDScript writes almost like Python). However, Godot does have a version that supports C# if you would like to use it or if your more comfortable using it. It's all explained in more detail on their website.
@@AstonJay i'm 3 month nto godot noe, and I really appreciate the work put behind it
Thankyou for breaking down the new fees, Hey Coco can you please do a video on ironsource ad setup for both under 13's and over 13's all the tutorials only do it for over 13.
Are you guys gonna use Unity now?
Yeah, I will
no
Switching to Unreal.
For now...
I think that may be the prevailing stance of a lot of people.
This news is good news, but the fact that the entire community had to go into an uproar in order for these changes to happen, is sad; It was totally unnecesary. These better terms shoud've been what happened originally.
Of course. I was using and I will be using.
im making my own game engine at this point just by thinking about how dependent i would be on unity
Hang on a minute! So people are leaving Unity because of the runtime fee, and the runtime fee can only apply if you MAKE over $1 million (self-reported)! My God! Most indie devs won't even cross $200,000 in revenue. I wonder what the fuss is about.
5 months later, and I can definitely tell you that most of the people who are against unity after the changes don’t really understand what they are and how they would (or wouldn’t) be affected. Personally, I think the engine is better than before and Unity is showing clear effort to listen to the community. People are acting quite entitled for some reason.
What video editor do you use?
Screenflow for Mac
Isnt it
Based on their new calculator it is 200K even pre LTS 2023 changes, but I will confirm that
thx a million
So now they're totally removed download fee?
And also you will don't have any fees in free version?
And I want to start learning how to make games so in my situation should I teach unity or godot?
I believe you might have missed some points from the video; The installation fee is still present but applies only if you earn >1M$ in the last 12 months and had more than 1M downloads of your game.
Feel free to learn both engines, in my opinion, for the very start Godot is a good option
Thank you for your opinion I thinked that after reaching 1m downloads or you earn 1m in last 12 months you need to pay 2.5 % off what you earn
Check out 1:33 - there are two options regarding that (2,5% and installation fee) - you will pay whichever is lower for you
Thanks for explaining
@@CocoCode Thank you for that answer. I was unsure what it all meant.
Just ONE question that scares me. Is there any risk regarding Unitys payments, that makes you go bankrupt? Can my bank account go "minus" because of downloads and installs or anything else?
I´m one of those who doesn´t quite understand math and numbers.
//
This Splash Screen idea is smart move. I don't know what to do! Splash Screens are for noobies. Plus its better to stay with older version to avoid price fee!!
Hopefully they will not make any changes or updates that "force" us to use newer version
Dude Its Million Dollar Per Game!! TH-camrs Are Just Trying To Get Subscribers and More Attention. If My Game is A Million Dollar, I will Delete It From Store and Problem Solved LOL.@@farou5736
Do you need to have 1m downloads and 1m dollars in revenue? Like what if I you have 1m in revenue but not 1m downloads?
In that case the runtime fees do not apply. I suggest you try the calculator he has added in the description.
It doesn't sound too bad.... 1m dollars a month and only have to pay $10k? Seems fair.
So that means that if i make my games free, even with the 2024 version, i will never have to pay?
Yes since all their models are revenue based. If you make any money out of them, then eventually you will hit the $200k mark for the Unity pro subscription, or the $1m AND 1m downloads for the runtime fee.
Did they nix the software that tracks installs? The privacy concerns around that retroactive installs really has me concerned for user's privacy. Add they deleted the TOS clause and suddenly put it back today doesn't make things better lol.
Still planning on finishing my current project in Unity, but moving to Open Source.
I can't trust my passion to a company that just nuke it whenever they decide it makes their shareholders more money.
I cover that in this part of the video: 2:24
@@CocoCode That is fine but did they answer the question on HOW they were going to have Unity phone home on older builds unless some form of code was already embedded into current software to track installs?
What is that software, do you know?
Ironsource's former reputation gives me pause when they suddenly dropped that information.
As stated in the video, the runtime fee does not apply to the older game builds (builded using LTS 2022 or lower), so they do not need to track anything.
On newer builds (using LTS 2023 or newer) you will need to report your install/purchase data to Unity directly.
Of course that doesn't eliminate any other unanswered questions and reputation breach.
I guess they’re trying to lore people in to pay more money by removing the decade old, infamous splashscreen requirement. These new Unity games will be interesting.
It's too late. Even if the new pricing seem like a better deal (it's still crap) I just don't trust them anymore because it doesn't change the fact that Unity has become a spyware to deliver Ads and collect as much user data as possible and I hate it. Their goal is clear: Get installed on as many smartphone as possible, collect user data, deliver ads. Also, the runtime fee is still a completely arbitrary "trust me bro" metric, no company in there right mind would be okay with such a deal.
I was fortunate enough to only be at the very start of my project, this way migrating to Unreal isn't too much of a problem. I hope others will find good alternatives to Unity as well.
The runtime fee is self reported. So it’s the developers that say “Trust me bro” just like they have been doing with revenue
Everyone is happy now
happy like how?
It's still totally unclear who needs a pro license - are those 200k counted per company revenue or per game?
Traditionally it's been per company, the new stuff seem to be all per game. Now plus is gone an no one in the universe knows what the 200k means 🤷♂️
How's it unclear? If you make over a million dollars on one of your games, get pro. Check out the calculater they provide on their FAQ. It literally couldn't be clearer.
@@globes179 Are you saying they're moving from looking at you're company's total revenue to now counting the profits of each individual game the company is making? That is certainly the way we all would like it to be - it's also not the way it's been historically though.
Looking at the online calculator they provided it's clear they're still going by company revenue unfortunately. I would have loved to see what you described though.
I'm glad Unity changed that because I really love Unity and didn't want to switch to another engine. I understand that Unity needs more money to improve their product so I totally accept this new policy but it's a shame they didn't do this right away which made them lose trust and a pretty big part of their users.
@cooldude-mi9wz just ignore that kid. It’s not worth your time
They’ll probably re-earn a major part of community trust if they just fire the CEO or whoever allowed this policy to go through
@@WyMustIGo "I've been there and done that and made more than you ever will" How old are you? 10?
In order to force developers to 2023 LTS, 2022 LTS will be a shitty version? New Splash Screen thing is only on 2023 LTS, you still need a Pro lisense to get ride of it on 2022 LTS.
The real question is: What is the next shit that come form the CEO and when.
They keep the runtime fee for new versions, but that requires them to correctly identify the Unity version a game is made with.
If that identification fails, for instance with hacked pirated copies, devs could face bankruptcy.
they have in the past "by mistake" broken features of old unity versions, so that affected devs are forced to upgrade and go under the new EULA
Where was it said that 2022 LTS would be shitty?
@@Andrew90046zeroIn order to force devs to use 2023 LTS, you know the CEO, I'm probably right, am I?
That means unity Saved angry birds🤩
Unuty kills garten of banban 🤩
I never even knew you had were forced to pay for unity until now.
Did they kick Mr. Electronic Arts to the curb?
1:33 Jumpscare alert
1st comment🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
im 2
Godot is free, GameMaker charges $9.99 per month for mobile and desktop builds.
I think, with 2D games, devs will pick one of these options, whereas Unreal Engine will be the primary alternative to Unity with 3D games.
Any hobbyist / beginner who still picks Unity is completely naive.
Flax Engine just sitting here like: what am i chopped liver
A bit harsh to say that would be naive. You can still use Unity in a non-comercial way.
I learned a lot about game design from Unity, and each engine has their own "systems" that may show you a different way to think about engine design. After using Unity for 5 years, I am way more confident in potentially making my own engine, or eventually transitioning to another one.
I think it's still worth looking at Unity as a option for getting into game development, but I can agree that doing a large scale project in Unity right now is not a good idea.
The fee will be applied from LTS 2024. Not LTS 2023
Nope. It will be applied from LTS 2023, which will be available in 2024.
@@Alexciaooo oh i see. Noted
Currently we have LTS 2022 - and it's 2023. They are basically a year behind in LTS naming ;)
If unity can keep changing its pricing so frequently, who knows when 10 dev hit a million and they will start charging .20 cents again..
Unity has a real chance here to learn from their mistake and just take a huge lead over everyone else. I think they might do it. The nay-sayers and emotional complainers will never stop doing their thing, but so far, this is a huge step in the right direction.
I have no idea how that pricing thing got approved in the first place, but Unity already ruined their reputation. GG Unity
Its better but i think im not going to use it still
ok then
ill finish my currant game and move to UE
yeee fuck unity, im waiting my rams to get shipped to move to ue... but if my cpu or gpu doesnt support ue ill die.
ok if i made a game that i made 200k off of.... unity can take 2k.
After what happened? Still keeping far, far away from Unity.
I am feeling very happy about splash screen customization and new pricing on Unity Personal
As a hobbyist, I already moved to Godot after version 4.0 was released.
Bevy might also be an option in some years from now.
John Riccitiello is gone
Come on, who makes above $1m in the last 12 months folks? Why do you care about this price change?
@@TheyBroughtBackStupidHandles What you don't understand is you start paying runtime fees if you make revenue of $ 1,000,000 in the last 12 months. Realistically, this applies only to a select few game studios. Please be realistic. I wonder if I'm the only poor soul on TH-cam comments.
@@gunhann a few game studio? can you explain what do you mean by that?
@@AK_user What do you not understand?