Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient 4-Seater Aircraft 2023-2024 | Price & Specs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this episode, we’ll be taking a look at our list of the most fuel-efficient 4-seater aircraft in the market, utilizing either piston or turbocharged engines. We will look at their average fuel consumption, useful load, and other technical specifications that make them worthy of this list, so sit back, relax, and enjoy the ride because this is going to be a good one!
    Just like land transportation, it is also important to consider the fuel consumption of the aircraft that we are flying. It is now more common to find aircraft models that offer extraordinary fuel efficiency, with greater range and considerable maximum take-off weight. When talking about fuel efficiency, however, useful load and cabin space are often neglected. Nonetheless, there are still several aircraft models out there that not only take the consumed gallons per hour into account but also offer great cabin space and top-notch features and capabilities.
    🛩️ If you enjoyed this episode, give us a LIKE, write a COMMENT, and SHARE the video!
    🛩️ SUBSCRIBE and click the notification bell to get up-to-date with new uploads!
    FOLLOW US:
    / aviationfederation
    DONATE HERE:
    www.buymeacoff...
    OUR PLAYLIST:
    • Top 5 Cheapest Private...
    MORE VIDEOS:
    Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Turboprop Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    • Top 5 Most Fuel-Effici...
    Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Private Jets 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    • Top 5 Most Fuel-Effici...
    Top 5 Most Expensive Turboprops 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
    • Top 5 Most Expensive T...
    Top 5 Hybrid-Electric Aircraft 2021-2022 | New Technologies & Features
    • Top 5 Hybrid-Electric ...
    EXTRA INFO:
    1:15 - Cirrus SR22
    © Cirrus Aircraft
    Engine: Continental IO-550-N
    Fuel Consumption: 18 gal/hr
    Useful Load: 1,328 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 84 gal
    Price: USD 755,000
    2:53 - Evolution Piston
    © Evolution Aircraft
    Engine: YTEO-540-iE2
    Fuel Consumption: 18 gal/hr
    Useful Load: 945 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 168 gal
    Price: USD 650,000
    4:42 - Lancair Mako
    © Lancair International
    Engine: IO-540
    Fuel Consumption: 12.5 gal/hr
    Useful Load: 1350 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 109 gal
    Price: USD 350,000
    6:30 - Diamond DA42
    © Diamond Aircraft
    Engine: Two Austro Engine 300 turbocharged common-rail injected 2.0-litre diesel
    Fuel Efficiency: 10.4 gal/hr
    Useful Load: 1,299 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 76.4 gal / 512 lbs
    Price: USD 468,638
    8:35 - Diamond DA40
    © Diamond Aircraft
    Engine: Austro Engine AE 300 turbocharged common-rail injected 2.0-litre diesel engine
    Fuel Consumption: 5.1 gal/hr
    Useful Load: 904 lbs
    Fuel Capacity: 39 gal / 261 lbs
    Price: USD 430,000
    10:32 - Questions
    OTHER VIDEOS:
    How Fuel Efficient Is An Airplane?
    • How Fuel Efficient Is ...
    Piston and Turboprop engines | What is the difference?
    • Piston and Turboprop e...
    5 Most Economical Private Jets In The World
    • 5 Most Economical Priv...
    DISCLAIMER:
    The views expressed in our videos are our opinions and may not necessarily reflect those of the companies we feature.
    Our content abides by the terms of Fair Use for education and commentary and the clips we feature in our editorials are owned by their respective copyright holders. The clips presented are for informational and non-commercial purposes only. For any business, media, or partnership inquiries, comment below or email: legal@emotionmedia.net
    #FuelEfficient #FourSeaterAircraft #SmallAircraft #AviationFederation

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว +2

    *Did we miss any other models out there that deserve to be on this list? Which other fuel-saving aircraft would you recommend buying? To see more amazing aircraft videos, check these out:*
    Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Turboprop Aircraft 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    th-cam.com/video/ZdYG4mrWc9Q/w-d-xo.html
    Top 5 Most Fuel-Efficient Private Jets 2022-2023 | Price & Specs
    th-cam.com/video/MDv1qmdi_PI/w-d-xo.html
    Top 5 Hybrid-Electric Aircraft 2021-2022 | New Technologies & Features
    th-cam.com/video/sUW8vqn6ERQ/w-d-xo.html

  • @renardinosrenard9581
    @renardinosrenard9581 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Today you forgot a beautiful plane .... Pipistrel Panthera

  • @patshes1951
    @patshes1951 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Abselutly massive price differences.

  • @williamkennedy2069
    @williamkennedy2069 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The girl talking sounds cute, you should put her picture so we can see who is talking

  • @FasterLower
    @FasterLower ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What happened to the Pipistrel Panthera? Faster with less fuel consumption that the Cirrus and (even though its not Certified yet) there are more of them flying that the Evolution Piston

  • @kresimirmilisa5560
    @kresimirmilisa5560 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    cirrus sr22 is good turboprop aircraft always nice videos.

    • @AC-jk8wq
      @AC-jk8wq ปีที่แล้ว

      This post supports the false pretenses…
      Congrats on responding to your own videos!
      This aircraft was never powered by a turboprop.
      😃

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @cageordie
    @cageordie ปีที่แล้ว +2

    These numbers don't add up. SR22 has 92 gallon capacity and burns 18 gallons at cruise and yet we hear it has two hour duration, which is hard to square with the 1,049nm range the manufacturers claim at a cruise speed of 213 knots that would take nearly 5 hours. So where does the 2-3 come from? Since the first one is so far off why waste time listening to the rest?

  • @진형김-b5t
    @진형김-b5t ปีที่แล้ว

    유익한 유튜브 채널 입니다

  • @87camillo87
    @87camillo87 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What about Tecnam P2010 170HP TDI?

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You really can't go wrong with most Tecnam in terms of fuel efficiency, in fact, we featured them on a separate video. Please check it out!

  • @kevinmcquown
    @kevinmcquown ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm not sure where you are getting your retail pricing? For example, you state that the Diamond DA-42 has a base price of $462,000. That is way off. The actual base price is $979,000.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว

      These are original MSRPs and still do not include local taxes and other fees. Inflation is also not factored in yet. But thanks for pointing that out.

  • @6862ptc
    @6862ptc ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Evolution aircraft shown is Turbine Powered!

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're absolutely right! The Evolution aircraft is indeed turbine powered, offering impressive performance and capabilities.

    • @6862ptc
      @6862ptc ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Aviation Federation But your video says both on the screen title and narration that the Evolution aircraft is PISTON-POWERED, yet shows a turbine-powered Evolution. You titled that section: the "Evolution Piston" on your video, you ONLY discuss the piston version yet show a Turbine powered aircraft.

  • @russelbaird3342
    @russelbaird3342 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I know range is somewhat subjective, but it would be really nice if you mentioned it more often or at all .

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Absolutely! Range is an important consideration, especially for those planning longer flights. Is there a specific aircraft's range you'd like more details on?

  • @YG-wn7rk
    @YG-wn7rk ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Forgot Cessna TTX

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว

      We considered it but the economic cruising speed seems too slow compared to the rest of the aircraft featured here.

  • @justNvlog
    @justNvlog ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doesn't really seam lime a fuel efficient list

  • @brycecampbell4845
    @brycecampbell4845 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cessna 182 RG Turbo pretty good

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed, the Cessna 182 RG Turbo is a solid choice. What particularly stands out to you about this aircraft?

  • @Jyotishsr1982
    @Jyotishsr1982 ปีที่แล้ว

    it would have been better if you used SI.

  • @cozyflyinggirl
    @cozyflyinggirl ปีที่แล้ว

    My 4 seat Cozy can fly 1000 miles at 15,000 feet on 5.5 gallons per hour (all be it at “only” 190 mph) and at ~< $100k.

  • @AC-jk8wq
    @AC-jk8wq ปีที่แล้ว

    Lots of confusion between normally aspirated, turbo, and turbine…
    If the author doesn’t understand these… they don’t understand efficiency of aircraft.
    One of the most efficient four seat planes ever is the Mooney line of aircraft…
    Note… when you see a pair of large exhaust pipes exiting at the front of the engine, that’s a turbine!
    None of the data seems to be factual…. Why let facts get in the way.

  • @pdeltoro
    @pdeltoro ปีที่แล้ว

    All the prices are wrong !

  • @deanwells2859
    @deanwells2859 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It would sure be helpful to have had a narrator who knew how to pronounce English words correctly. I realize you may be using AI but you still have a long way to go. The number 3 and 4 airplanes don’t burn 80 gallons an hour of fuel, which is one of the problems. It can only stay in the air “for a little over 2 hours”? Somebody really messed up with this data. Part of the information included was not accurate and this video should not have been released.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback! We're continuously improving upon our editorial and presentations.

  • @Santu1939
    @Santu1939 ปีที่แล้ว

    That evolution piston is such an ugly airplane.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  ปีที่แล้ว

      We love those strong opinions! Feedback on the aesthetics of an aircraft can vary, and beauty is subjective. While you may find the Evolution Piston airplane unattractive, others may have different preferences. Ultimately, the design and appearance of an aircraft are influenced by factors such as functionality, performance, and aerodynamics.

  • @yurimoros
    @yurimoros หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are totally wrong in the description of the lanc air evolution. Mixing the pistol info with the turbine info make you as an aviation Channel totally un-reliable… happens in most of your videos