Developing artificial intelligence technologies like GPT is an extremely difficult task, but the developers who made it possible have achieved something truly remarkable. I deeply appreciate their work and contribution to the field.
Same here I feel really conflicted about this stuff! Though I must admit the stuff it can come up with is pretty damn impressive... Which is kinda why I hate it! It almost renders human artistry redundant.
@Jon Well, sure but they need to take as much time as they need to make this publicly available in a way that can't be abused (they talk about that on their site), and since there's no company regulating AI we should just be grateful they're not just throwing it out there and taking their time instead :)
This is such a great video explaining clearly what dalle is, love it when companies spend time and resources creating clear explanations like those! Thank you OpenAI! Glad to share your work on my channel!
Either you should feel bad, because people are trying their hardest to automate art and make you obsolete, with no respect or love for humanity. Or you should feel worse, because they'll actually succeed. Either way, you should probably not feel good about it. I really hope it fails, and won't have any hugely negative impact.
These text-to-image generators need to allow for users(individual or team) to add their own subset of image data to the training dataset. By using that new added image set along with their own unique caption data the user could extend the possible image styles. This would allow for even more specific and nuanced image outputs. LOTS of individuals and cgi teams are sometimes going to want as much precision as possible.
Educating people on what AI actually is and what it's abilities are is as important as creating the AI itself. Thanks for making videos like this one, which focus on single issues and explain them in layman's terms.
Aren't you scared that this might take your job in the future? I found out I like editing programs like Photoshop, InDesign, Premiere, Illustratior etc. and would like to work in publicity or PR Is it even worth it with those AI's comming up nowadays? You would've thought that arts and creative things would escape this toxic enviroment and field of IT...but guess not.
@@enzu4221 I'm with you. I paint portraits and fantasy art. I've been commissioned locally, but I don't do it for a living though. I work in biomedicine for my real job. Looking at this technology, I can tell many artists and graphic designers will become redundant. It's kind of scary if you are in this space and your livelihood is dependent on it.
@@BootsandUtes Yea its pretty cringe and scarry but guess the AI needs a starting point. I believe self driving cars by AI (more of them) or a robot that can learn to operate on people with 100% accuracy would be a better focus for AI. But tbh, an AI that creates art its safer than an AI who operates on you (for now at least). Anyways, a world in which almost everything its automated and there are only managers and entrepreneurs (as they have way less to pay for AI to do other people's jobs) its literally the capitalist utopia. But I dont have enough knowledge about the labor market as I have one more year of highschool left before I go to a university and start working. But this is what I think of it now.
I am an indie game developer and this is really useful especially for games that have images, I even manage to create a game with the use of this ai art.
Sometimes when i read a novel, lack of images that i have in mind limits my imagination greatly and it could make me quit reading. Dall-E 2 can provide a lot of images for the story and help people imagine far much better... reading a book full of good imaginations provide more fun than a movie. I hope more people can use it in daily life.
This could help so many people in terms of accessibility to information! Imagine being able to put in any arbitrary book, and have AI generated voice-over in the language you're fluent in as well as illustrations, or in the future video representing the story.
Man, I'm with you. English is not my 1st language, so sometimes I really had a tough time to imagine something whenever I read books written in English, especially sci Fi books. If this technology will ever be fully functional and accessible, which I really hope that it will, the 1st novel that I would like to try is Anathem by Neal Stephenson.
How about dear human beings? Haha... I find your reflection very interesting, in fact, before reading your comment I have been reflecting on the SAME... But let me make a CRITICAL statement, that is, QUESTIONING: Why do YOU BELIEVE that you have a GREAT INCAPACITY, as you mention, to IMAGINE certain things within your PSYCHIC apparatus? DON'T YOU BELIEVE that NOT being able to do something that EVERY HUMAN BEING DOES is a FULL FAILURE within your psychic apparatus? That is to say, you are thinking, as a human being who is NOT looking for the ROOT of his inconvenience... I want you to understand me, THE HUMAN BEING, self-corrupts himself and by NOT knowing how to repair himself, he then looks for TOOLS that make up for HIS INCOMPETENCE... Do you think it COHERENT that we do that? Do you think that we SHOULD use technology to SUPPLY our SELF-INDUCED psychological flaws? You can tell me; I have not decided NOT to be able to imagine. Ok, I accept it, but... You DON'T THINK you have a BIG PROBLEM, because you CAN'T imagine? Let's say that you have not self-generated said inconvenience, as I have stated before, but even so, you STILL HAVE said inconvenience, right? So... What do we do about it? Do we look for the ETIOLOGY of said inconvenience, or on the contrary do we use technology to NOT SELF-KNOW OURSELVES and then CONTINUE AVOIDING THE ROOT OF OUR CONFLICTS? Tell me HONESTLY, what do you think is the most appropriate thing to do in your case? Use technology MEDIOCALLY to AVOID our ROOT problems or on the contrary, use it AFTER we are already HEALTHY?... Do you get me?... Kind regards, teacher. A big greeting from Argentina.
But can you save some elements to keep consistency in the creation of a second image? For example, I have in mind a video novel in which protagonists recurs but in different locations. Will DALL-E 2 be able to save those characters and features and load them into another setting/image? I tried to mail the devs but got zero answers.....
I used to be a professional visual artist, but now I mainly write and take photos. What excites me about this tech is the opportunity to cram more of my personal expression into the amount of life that I have been given on this planet. Words are my current fav for self expression, but visuals can add a lot to not just the experience of those words, but in discovery of that text. If I publish a blog for instance, I always include a photo, as I find that many folks use that visual to decide whether they will spend time reading the text. Visuals embedded within the text can also provide extra layers of info and expression. Prob is the time it takes to create both compelling words and images.Computer based design software has sped up the production of visual expression, word processors have sped up the production of words, DAW have.... etc. I'm looking forward to seeing how much time can be saved using AI tools such as this :-)
Get ready for not being paid then I'm afraid, dude. Professional Visual Artists are no longer required. These guys are working on text generating AI as well, just to make sure you have zero revenue streams going forward.
I just would like to understand what is your purpose to develop things like this and where in your opinion are we going as a humanity? In my opinion things like this are negation of creating and the art - in art we admire the artist, not the result only, so where is the art, if there is no artist and creating process? Do not get me wrong, results of this thing are really breathtaking and in itself it's a piece of art, I'm not lying, but for the god's sake - it shouldn't be widely available, you have proven that it is possible, you are the boss - and it should be enough, otherwise you will be like Oppenheimer or Nobel who regretted their inventions, cause what - we will be living in the artificial world where computers are generating everything, books, images, music and we will be happy enough doing nothing? In my opinion a lot of people will lose meaning of their lives, fun and satisfaction of creating, and a lot of people will lose fun of consuming the art, cause art will become worthless if anybody can do anything without any skills and effort. People love to share their work with the others - and now their work will be buried under the tons of content from generators receiving ovations they do not deserve on. There will be no reason to learn and improve your own skills if anybody can release the same doing literally nothing. For who you will be creating books, music, movies or images, if anybody can generate own and do not need to watch your stuff? I'm not talking about work and / or money only, I do not earn money in this way. I'm talking about the art and creating, which requires some practicing and individual abilities, what makes the art beautiful - and generating content by puting simple phrase into text field doesn't look as an art or creative work. Imagine the situation that photographer spent years on making some huge photo project - this is what makes this project awesome, and now it can be put to the trash can, cause anybody can generate the same without leaving basement, all of efforts, patient, work, "soul" and "heart" put in it doesn't matter, cause anyone can say "I spent few years too", even if it's not true. It is not like using i.e. Photoshop to do that, which is a real tool requiring some skills and practicing - generators are not helping to draw, compose or anything - they are doing these things instead of us, it is drawing without drawing, making photos without making photos, making five years travel documentary without leaving the apartment. What is satysfaying and challenging in it? Generating lyrics in a way "computer, generate my text about love where every single word contains letter A"? Come on. It's like olympic sports on drugs - not fair to the audience, the competitors and to the art itself, cause in real you didn't do anything. We admire sportsmen cause of their efforts, work, limits and result of practising, not the (false) result only, cheaters are ashamed and disqualificated. Every painting we know will be worthless, cause everyone can create the same without any effort and say "I did it", go fûck yourself, Picasso. You are making awesome drawings, images, photographs and puting on Instagram? Go fûck yourself, your talent and skills are useless. You had written this symphony or simple song? Go fûck yourself, Chopin, I can make it by one click, you and your music are worthless. Things like DALL-E, Imagen, AIVA and more looks for me like spitting in the face of our artistic legacy (and in Salvadore's face also, using his name in this context is a shame). Making creating SO easy is killing the magic of creating nice things, and calling it "tool" is a lie, cause even stupid hammer requires some practicing, it won't hit the nail by telling "hit the nail". Yes, of course, I see the bright side of it, but in bigger scale I do not see more profits than disadvantages for society, it is not helping us in lives - it's taking away our humanity and fun of being alive. Human things should remain for humans. I really would like to understand your thoughts and goals, what is your purpose and idea? I really would like to understand people who sees so "WHOOOOAAAAH!" in it. What is your point of view? Or maybe I'm just missing something? Go on, change my mind, I really want to be wrong.
I'm worried about the same thing, I've been practicing drawing and 3D modeling, but after seeing this I feel... worse about it. Not sure how to describe the feeling but I don't like it.
@@tobycat7 Will see - maybe I wasn't clear enough above, but what I really do not like in this, is opportunity of releasing direct, effortless result as an author / creator - publishing image "draw me a bunny with carrot" as yours is not fair to the other artists and the art itsefl, cause in real you didn't do anything. From the other hand - almost every designer is taking someone's images from stock or other sites as a base, so maybe it's better to think that it will be generating just more customized stock images. If it will be used as a base, not the final result "one click => short phrase => release", but still require any work / effort from you in detailing / improving / combining, then I'm ok with that - at least you did something, not copy-pasted only. Yeah, it will make a little mess with some creative works and smaller designs, but it is hard to believe that it can always generate exactly expected thing in first attempt (at least not now ;) ), any effort with detailing will be still needed and it's hard to believe (again) that anyone without any skills, imagination and kind of taste will be able to do that really nice, so maybe things will be not so bad - I'm trying to find some positives in it, at least it's better for me than getting angry ;)
And the best parte is that no one seems to care, in the video they dont even mention our job or anything, art is something that is done because you work for It and because you love It, as you said, we are taking humanity away from us little by little with ai. If It is a tool, use it for something useful, godamn, what where this people thinking when they did this, its just unrespectful to the people Who work to Chase their dreams
@@sankaspa5738 The same can be said for photos. And yet it advanced our society. Of course this is a bigger leap, but if we were to consider everyone on the planet we would never progress on anything as a species
A lot of people are excited in the comments. All I can see is a very efficient road to rendering artists obsolete. A future I neither really need nor one I want. To me it just seems like yet another job, and a wonderful part of the human experience, becoming automated. Why in the world should art, one of the _VERY FEW_ jobs that people DON'T take to pay the bills have to be done by AI? Is the plan just to crush young artists dreams? I honestly can't really bring myself to be excited about it.
This is going to revolutionize all kinds of art and media 🙌🏽 I am hoping in the future Dalle 3 4 or 5 would have the ability to create 3D files & possible animations or even entire films 😮
A word of advice for OpenAI team. You REALLY should make a USER MANUAL for the AI because most people just DONT KNOW how to use it. Basic commands for all functions should be made available to everyone for FREE.
I believe under some software licenses it's possible for the software creators to place a copyright on material made with that software. That doesn't mean you lose the copyright for anything you put in, however. They can only copyright what they add to or change from your work.* For example, if you ask the AI to draw your character, they can only claim the rights to that image, not the specifications you gave it. People would hate this for obvious reasons and it would be a bad deal for businesses. I'm sure they won't have such an imposing license. *Technically you can agree to just about anything, but if the agreement is obviously unreasonable then it might not hold up in court. Many websites automatically take a license to use anything you post on their site. You can't use their site without agreeing to this. They'll also say you can't post anything you don't hold the rights to.
At the moment you're very limited in what you do with the output if you somehow get access, but eventually it will probably be like GPT-3, which is this: "OpenAI will not assert copyright over Content generated by the API for you or your end users."
if I use one image created with DALL-e in the thumbnail of a youtube video, am i free NOT to include any reference that the image in the thumbnail was created with DALL-e? or am i enforced to include some kind of attribution? Thanks
Honestly I see this and just feel depressed. Creating / expressing art is such a human quality, and I fear things like this is going to take that away.
@@Mopsie *Until you realize that everything that makes you a person is nothing more than a biological computer that can be surpassed within the next few years*
Nobody will stop you from crating experssing your own art the old fashioned way. When the photo camera was invented some people thought it would make artists redundant, but art made by humans became more valued and popular than ever. People will still pay more money for art painted on a real canvas.
@@Mopsie No, but the car did take the horses away. And automation is already putting a lot of jobs at risk. All just tools, but still rendering something else obsolete. It may only be a tool now, but to me this is the first steps on a path to a world where most art is made entirely by AI, and I don't see why that wouldn't be the case if we continue on this path. Clicking the "make movie" or "write book" button will be far, far cheaper and more accessible than going through the actual artmaking process. When a tool becomes powerful enough to do a job for you, you are no longer needed.
@@Mopsie hammer or paint bush is a tool and they will not build a house only if you tell them "build me a house". DALL-E is not a tool, it is doing something instead of you and killing creativity and human beauty of art in the same time.
It's both brilliant and at the same time kinda scary. Certainly it's technical capability is incredible and it opens the door to all kinds of weird and wonderful new imagery. Though I take some issues with the notion of it "amplifying our creative potential".... Is that statement really valid when it reduces the need for human artistry and skill to just typing a few words? The same could be said for AI music generators. It's certainly a clever system but I'm really conflicted over whether it actually enhaces humanity or deminishes us buy making our own creative faculties increasingly redundant. 🤔
A artist that I deeply admire described Dalle2 perfectly.Its impressive just like any other simular product. It's interesting. But most importantly it is to art what reality TV is to the human experience. It's a soulless commercial tool, made by people that want to milk every last bit of authenticity they can get their hands on for its last dime. Given that OpenAI is basically the NFT-tech bro of AI companies I would rather support any other simular project than this. They are probably perfected and published by a less greedy company before Dalle2 is available
I'm an artist who wants to work with eather ilustration, comics, and animation, and the only thing I'm good at it art, and visual story telling. This makes me sceard for my future. I literally pray to every God, Godess, Demon, and Angel from every religion, and mythology in the hopes, that at least one of them is reall, and listens my prays, for the survivel of indi projects, and indi animaters, ilustration artists, comic artists, and artists.
AI tools like GPT-3, DALL-E, and Codex are going to replace so many jobs in the near future. Here's hoping universal basic income becomes a thing, because we don't even need Sci-fi movie level AI for it to be extremely disruptive.
I hear a lot of tech bros saying "you don't need to worry that this is going to replace your life''s work, because we'll not need jobs in like a few years." Realistically, I don't see such a major restructuring of *all of current human economy* like that happening any time soon. A lot of people will be probably out of a job for a long time, including people like artists or musicians who rather like their job, to the point that it's their purpose of living.
This is mind blowing tech and the implications are incredible. This is going to pave the way for Ai driven entertainment. is this a tool or a means to an end for designers and creatives alike. Exciting times.
@@TheFatblob25 I don’t disagree that Pandora’s box has opened, but the progress humanity is making technology is inevitable, you could say that switching the World Wide Web was ‘Pandoras box’ The fact is, this is happening and also this is a great tool for people to be able to express the creative ideas in their head.
@@justinhackney5704 We agree on the power of the internet. I myself have been a beneficiary.. At the same time I recognize the power it has to completely upend aspects of human society. This is a big leap & at least from a basic level,. Human creativity is irrelevant to 90% of web commerce
I've been playing around with the Beta for a day or two now, I'm very impressed with it's fidelity, but also unfortunately underwhelmed by it's lack of flexibility/creativity. A simple prompt like "A bathroom in the style of H.R Giger", when input in crAIyon delivers exactly what you'd imagine, a bathroom with biomechanical xenomorph looking surfaces and pipes, while Dall-e delivered bathroom's that are mostly flat metal with odd sinks. I tried "Spock and Kirk in Among Us" with crAIyon and got a blue crewmate who who's visor/helmet was shaped like Spock's bowl cut hair. When I tried the same prompt in Dall-e, I got what looked like 1990s video game box art render of two people, neither looking like Spock or Kirk or anything remotely Among Us related in the background. I tried being more verbose with Dall-e, submitting: "A screenshot from the video game 'Among Us', with the crew-members customized to look like Star Trek's Starfleet officers". It backfired spectacularly and gave me something that looked like another low budget CW young adults series. Pardon if I'm sounding overly critical, but I've been generating content for months using other (less-refined) neural-nets, and had very high expectations for Dall-E. I will be putting Google's Imagen through the same type of tests when/if ever it becomes available.
Interesting point you made. Maybe its network is not connected to pop-culture references, but it just uses nouns / verbs / adjectives and the human logic we give them. It's very difficult to teach a machine "in the style of" because even in the human world that is very interpretable and hard to define except for very famous cases that launched an entire genre of art. Maybe if you tell it "in the style of Van Gogh" it will know because he's such a well known artist? For example I tried using terms such as surrealism and it worked just fine.
The problem is I think this is fine; but the inevitable future versions of this are not going to be okay.... When concept artists that spent decades or two honing their craft suddenly find themselves jobless and people start committing suicide, we'll start asking if it was a good idea but it will be too late to do anything. You can't go back once you've pushed technology forward, if you won't do it someone else will.
Um you okay pal? Really suicide over arts? Also if AI really do became compatible to takr our jobs the government have no choice but limit what the ai can do.
@@ForceInEvHorizon I don't know if you've ever cared about something, a hobby or person you're really passionate about. But for artists, they generally care a lot about their art. Hell, for some (especially some historical figures) that outlet is the only thing _keeping_ them from committing suicide. But even for the ones who are perfectly mentally sound, art can be the purposes of their existence. I would consider it the purpose of mine. Something higher than yourself to strive for and perfect, and a reason to stick around. Our meanings of life, if you will. Removing the purpose of someone's life, if I may be a bit dramatic, is akin to taking away a devoted mother's child. Akin to crippling an ambitious athlete for life. Or like killing God in front of a Monk. It's their reason for living, why _wouldn't_ they care? (And as the previous response said, people have committed suicide over less meaningful things, I suppose.)
@@ForceInEvHorizon The technology is progressing at unprecedented rates. The original Dall-E is already outdated (and, might I add, was hardly better than at least 75% of artists.) But that wasn't the point, anyhow.
I've been an artist/graphicdesigner/illustrator for over 40 years, yup I started out analog. This is amazing, but yes I am concerned for the future of the art world...however I will point out that it is the very real" human energy" that an artist transfers to their art that make a piece of original art elicit response. Artists will know I speak of the [emotional/mental struggle /anguish/joy/pain etc.] that artists experience as they work ...this energy is reflected on original man-made works...that is why the original works are great...not sure AI will be able to capture that energyon its works. Progress is unstoppable however, and I am just as enchanted by this version of Dall-E as everyone else ; I am also eagerly awaiting my Dick Tracy translator watch, and my Beam me up Scotty teleportor. : )
I think of of the most interesting usage of this is interpreting dreams. If you can remember scenes from your dreams and tell DALL-E to make an image of it then you can make some interpretations. I would love to try that. It probably also would be interesting in a psychoanalytical perspective.
Could we create videos with this in the future? Or even interactive game worlds instantly rendered from what you type in in real time? You could basically recreate a lucid dream with that if used together with VR
Can DALLE-2 be used for diagnostic imaging? Like for CT or MRI images if they are "grainy" and have the AI enhance them. CT scans use a lot of radiation and if the radiation dose could be lowered using AI that would be amazing. With MRI scans, it takes a long time to acquire images and maybe AI could be used to reduce scan times.
We have different things for stuff like that, "Denoising algorithms" or "Noise reduction algorithms" they're used in 3D modeling to reduce noise after the raytracing is done
This is about to cross a very serious line, OpenAI in the wrong hands, (code always falls into the wrong hands) will make deep fakes look , sound, and eventually feel like the stuff of dreams, but will be humanity's worst nightmare.
says who? deepfakes are going to be close to reality, people just need to be understanding of the fact that literally anything you see can be fabricated. It already is reality. I don't see how once this becomes public knowledge it can still be used to decieve people.
A tutorial lol, seriously? Though I agree they could've put at least a quick and rough explanation of how it works à la 2minute papers in their "explained" video.
You mean like how to interact with the software itself? I would also like to know lol. Currently people are on the waitlist to try it. But they have another previous iteration of the model called Dall-E 1. I think you can try that
No, it wont. imagine this technology in its best stage in the hands of large and not so large corporations. Do you think they are going to hire a creative when they can do it themselves through phrases? "You will have nothing and you will be happy" begins to gain strength.
What if people use this tool to generate some photos that could posed as a threat to politics or anything in our life? Would there be a way to identify the authenticity of the image?
The problem with AI systems is that they reduce human work but a lot of people need any work they can get. It can be advertised as human friendly or whatever, but we know its not in the bigger view. Tech is moving forward faster than the world in many parts. Its progress can literally starve people to death before we get to the super intelligent AI part. At some point, it may get rid of all our jobs and the only ones who live a decent life would be the rich people. Although, if everyone else is poor, how would they remain rich for long? No one buys from them. We need provision of free money much sooner to reduce the negative impact.
Yeah there will be a revolution against the rich who earned their money before AI disrupted the possibility for new generations of people to make a living. Why should people recognize and bow to this old money if they can no longer realistically earn it themselves? I think not! That's no longer capitalism, but a form of slavery. But the solution I think is that AI will also inadvertently disrupt the very notion of money and wealth and even power.
Проблема не в искусственном интеллекте и не в развитии, а в том что миром правят глупые и жадные люди. Уже сейчас возможно устранить голод на всей планете, если бы богатые этого захотели. Голод создан специально, а многие люди думают что голод это просто плохая судьба.
its working for free now , you just need to create an account and log in, you will have 50 points to waste on creating paintings (1point=1painting) , when you ran out of points you can pay 15 dollars for 115 more paintings, but you can create a new account and it will give you 50 paintings again for free, i use the DALL·E 2 right now.
Developing artificial intelligence technologies like GPT is an extremely difficult task, but the developers who made it possible have achieved something truly remarkable. I deeply appreciate their work and contribution to the field.
THAT THING IS VERY HARD, LETS GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE.
I'm afraid that the future generations would no longer be able to tell the difference between reality and 'just another image created by AI'
the real cookies taste better
There's already a lot of DALL-E images on the subreddit that i couldn't tell if it was a real artist or an AI
And there will be movies created by AI with no real actors/directors.
Don't worry. It will fool you in your lifetime
What is reality?
i can't decide whether i love this or hate it. it's honestly a bit creepy, but it's also so fascinating
?
Same here I feel really conflicted about this stuff! Though I must admit the stuff it can come up with is pretty damn impressive... Which is kinda why I hate it! It almost renders human artistry redundant.
Amazing model, can't wait for public availability for it!
Well, hope you have a confortable chair xD
@@miguelalvesmiguel7688 Lol. Been in my chair for years sometimes waiting for opeanAI to release models.
@@miguelalvesmiguel7688 In your avocado chair.
@Jon Well, sure but they need to take as much time as they need to make this publicly available in a way that can't be abused (they talk about that on their site), and since there's no company regulating AI we should just be grateful they're not just throwing it out there and taking their time instead :)
Presumably the computation cost is quite high too
This is such a great video explaining clearly what dalle is, love it when companies spend time and resources creating clear explanations like those! Thank you OpenAI! Glad to share your work on my channel!
10 Best TH-cam Bots for Boosting Views, Likes & Subscribers!
An outstanding achievement. The best part is that OpenAI is cautious of the hype and points out the pitfalls.
10 Best TH-cam Bots for Boosting Views, Likes & Subscribers!
@@mikek545 What do you mean?
this is so cool! a few days ago i saw the first DALL·E article but this is just more than incredible...
Damn I just learnt about the motivation and theory behind GAN today and I thought it was super impressive already. Now this is a whole new level.
instantly enlisted into the waitlist cant wait to try it
As a design students, idk how to feel about this....
You should be f***ing terrified 😨
Either you should feel bad, because people are trying their hardest to automate art and make you obsolete, with no respect or love for humanity.
Or you should feel worse, because they'll actually succeed.
Either way, you should probably not feel good about it.
I really hope it fails, and won't have any hugely negative impact.
The start of the death of human creativity.
These text-to-image generators need to allow for users(individual or team) to add their own subset of image data to the training dataset. By using that new added image set along with their own unique caption data the user could extend the possible image styles. This would allow for even more specific and nuanced image outputs. LOTS of individuals and cgi teams are sometimes going to want as much precision as possible.
This is a big threat for creators and artists.
Absolutely crazy. The speed of development in AI is faster than my Imagination.
This website is absolutely amazing. I had so much fun. Great work!
it was nice having a job...
Educating people on what AI actually is and what it's abilities are is as important as creating the AI itself. Thanks for making videos like this one, which focus on single issues and explain them in layman's terms.
A picture WAS worth a thousand words... now, not so much
You guys should do some live streams! That way, everyone can participate dynamically with the usage still being moderated.
This definitely is hard work that takes work to another level
Love it 💚 It will boost designers' superpowers immensely. I'm speaking as 20+ years graphic designer, specializing in brand design and UX.
Aren't you scared that this might take your job in the future?
I found out I like editing programs like Photoshop, InDesign, Premiere, Illustratior etc. and would like to work in publicity or PR Is it even worth it with those AI's comming up nowadays?
You would've thought that arts and creative things would escape this toxic enviroment and field of IT...but guess not.
@@enzu4221 I'm with you. I paint portraits and fantasy art. I've been commissioned locally, but I don't do it for a living though. I work in biomedicine for my real job. Looking at this technology, I can tell many artists and graphic designers will become redundant. It's kind of scary if you are in this space and your livelihood is dependent on it.
@@BootsandUtes Yea its pretty cringe and scarry but guess the AI needs a starting point. I believe self driving cars by AI (more of them) or a robot that can learn to operate on people with 100% accuracy would be a better focus for AI. But tbh, an AI that creates art its safer than an AI who operates on you (for now at least). Anyways, a world in which almost everything its automated and there are only managers and entrepreneurs (as they have way less to pay for AI to do other people's jobs) its literally the capitalist utopia. But I dont have enough knowledge about the labor market as I have one more year of highschool left before I go to a university and start working. But this is what I think of it now.
The future is a koala riding a motorcycle
This is… amazing. Wow! Incredible work.
This is going to inspire so many people to study ML. GPT-3 had that effect on me.
Guys can you make some achievement in music production field, this will be very helpful.
openai already has one that can extend music but it's quite limietd
is this the end of human effort for art related things
Hi! This is awesome! Thank you for your effort! What about the commercial use of the ai pictures results? Is it allowed? Thank you
Andrea
I am an indie game developer and this is really useful especially for games that have images, I even manage to create a game with the use of this ai art.
this is INSANE
Sometimes when i read a novel, lack of images that i have in mind limits my imagination greatly and it could make me quit reading.
Dall-E 2 can provide a lot of images for the story and help people imagine far much better... reading a book full of good imaginations provide more fun than a movie. I hope more people can use it in daily life.
This could help so many people in terms of accessibility to information!
Imagine being able to put in any arbitrary book, and have AI generated voice-over in the language you're fluent in as well as illustrations, or in the future video representing the story.
That sounds cool to me, though I don't think book readers want images
Man, I'm with you. English is not my 1st language, so sometimes I really had a tough time to imagine something whenever I read books written in English, especially sci Fi books. If this technology will ever be fully functional and accessible, which I really hope that it will, the 1st novel that I would like to try is Anathem by Neal Stephenson.
yeah
How about dear human beings? Haha...
I find your reflection very interesting, in fact, before reading your comment I have been reflecting on the SAME...
But let me make a CRITICAL statement, that is, QUESTIONING:
Why do YOU BELIEVE that you have a GREAT INCAPACITY, as you mention, to IMAGINE certain things within your PSYCHIC apparatus?
DON'T YOU BELIEVE that NOT being able to do something that EVERY HUMAN BEING DOES is a FULL FAILURE within your psychic apparatus?
That is to say, you are thinking, as a human being who is NOT looking for the ROOT of his inconvenience...
I want you to understand me, THE HUMAN BEING, self-corrupts himself and by NOT knowing how to repair himself, he then looks for TOOLS that make up for HIS INCOMPETENCE...
Do you think it COHERENT that we do that?
Do you think that we SHOULD use technology to SUPPLY our SELF-INDUCED psychological flaws?
You can tell me; I have not decided NOT to be able to imagine. Ok, I accept it, but... You DON'T THINK you have a BIG PROBLEM, because you CAN'T imagine? Let's say that you have not self-generated said inconvenience, as I have stated before, but even so, you STILL HAVE said inconvenience, right? So...
What do we do about it? Do we look for the ETIOLOGY of said inconvenience, or on the contrary do we use technology to NOT SELF-KNOW OURSELVES and then CONTINUE AVOIDING THE ROOT OF OUR CONFLICTS?
Tell me HONESTLY, what do you think is the most appropriate thing to do in your case? Use technology MEDIOCALLY to AVOID our ROOT problems or on the contrary, use it AFTER we are already HEALTHY?...
Do you get me?...
Kind regards, teacher.
A big greeting from Argentina.
Great work !
But can you save some elements to keep consistency in the creation of a second image?
For example, I have in mind a video novel in which protagonists recurs but in different locations.
Will DALL-E 2 be able to save those characters and features and load them into another setting/image?
I tried to mail the devs but got zero answers.....
I used to be a professional visual artist, but now I mainly write and take photos.
What excites me about this tech is the opportunity to cram more of my personal expression into the amount of life that I have been given on this planet.
Words are my current fav for self expression, but visuals can add a lot to not just the experience of those words, but in discovery of that text. If I publish a blog for instance, I always include a photo, as I find that many folks use that visual to decide whether they will spend time reading the text. Visuals embedded within the text can also provide extra layers of info and expression.
Prob is the time it takes to create both compelling words and images.Computer based design software has sped up the production of visual expression, word processors have sped up the production of words, DAW have.... etc.
I'm looking forward to seeing how much time can be saved using AI tools such as this :-)
Get ready for not being paid then I'm afraid, dude. Professional Visual Artists are no longer required. These guys are working on text generating AI as well, just to make sure you have zero revenue streams going forward.
So literally you are doomed.
I just would like to understand what is your purpose to develop things like this and where in your opinion are we going as a humanity? In my opinion things like this are negation of creating and the art - in art we admire the artist, not the result only, so where is the art, if there is no artist and creating process?
Do not get me wrong, results of this thing are really breathtaking and in itself it's a piece of art, I'm not lying, but for the god's sake - it shouldn't be widely available, you have proven that it is possible, you are the boss - and it should be enough, otherwise you will be like Oppenheimer or Nobel who regretted their inventions, cause what - we will be living in the artificial world where computers are generating everything, books, images, music and we will be happy enough doing nothing?
In my opinion a lot of people will lose meaning of their lives, fun and satisfaction of creating, and a lot of people will lose fun of consuming the art, cause art will become worthless if anybody can do anything without any skills and effort. People love to share their work with the others - and now their work will be buried under the tons of content from generators receiving ovations they do not deserve on. There will be no reason to learn and improve your own skills if anybody can release the same doing literally nothing. For who you will be creating books, music, movies or images, if anybody can generate own and do not need to watch your stuff?
I'm not talking about work and / or money only, I do not earn money in this way. I'm talking about the art and creating, which requires some practicing and individual abilities, what makes the art beautiful - and generating content by puting simple phrase into text field doesn't look as an art or creative work. Imagine the situation that photographer spent years on making some huge photo project - this is what makes this project awesome, and now it can be put to the trash can, cause anybody can generate the same without leaving basement, all of efforts, patient, work, "soul" and "heart" put in it doesn't matter, cause anyone can say "I spent few years too", even if it's not true. It is not like using i.e. Photoshop to do that, which is a real tool requiring some skills and practicing - generators are not helping to draw, compose or anything - they are doing these things instead of us, it is drawing without drawing, making photos without making photos, making five years travel documentary without leaving the apartment. What is satysfaying and challenging in it? Generating lyrics in a way "computer, generate my text about love where every single word contains letter A"? Come on.
It's like olympic sports on drugs - not fair to the audience, the competitors and to the art itself, cause in real you didn't do anything. We admire sportsmen cause of their efforts, work, limits and result of practising, not the (false) result only, cheaters are ashamed and disqualificated.
Every painting we know will be worthless, cause everyone can create the same without any effort and say "I did it", go fûck yourself, Picasso. You are making awesome drawings, images, photographs and puting on Instagram? Go fûck yourself, your talent and skills are useless. You had written this symphony or simple song? Go fûck yourself, Chopin, I can make it by one click, you and your music are worthless. Things like DALL-E, Imagen, AIVA and more looks for me like spitting in the face of our artistic legacy (and in Salvadore's face also, using his name in this context is a shame). Making creating SO easy is killing the magic of creating nice things, and calling it "tool" is a lie, cause even stupid hammer requires some practicing, it won't hit the nail by telling "hit the nail". Yes, of course, I see the bright side of it, but in bigger scale I do not see more profits than disadvantages for society, it is not helping us in lives - it's taking away our humanity and fun of being alive. Human things should remain for humans.
I really would like to understand your thoughts and goals, what is your purpose and idea? I really would like to understand people who sees so "WHOOOOAAAAH!" in it. What is your point of view? Or maybe I'm just missing something? Go on, change my mind, I really want to be wrong.
I'm worried about the same thing, I've been practicing drawing and 3D modeling, but after seeing this I feel... worse about it. Not sure how to describe the feeling but I don't like it.
@@tobycat7 Will see - maybe I wasn't clear enough above, but what I really do not like in this, is opportunity of releasing direct, effortless result as an author / creator - publishing image "draw me a bunny with carrot" as yours is not fair to the other artists and the art itsefl, cause in real you didn't do anything.
From the other hand - almost every designer is taking someone's images from stock or other sites as a base, so maybe it's better to think that it will be generating just more customized stock images. If it will be used as a base, not the final result "one click => short phrase => release", but still require any work / effort from you in detailing / improving / combining, then I'm ok with that - at least you did something, not copy-pasted only. Yeah, it will make a little mess with some creative works and smaller designs, but it is hard to believe that it can always generate exactly expected thing in first attempt (at least not now ;) ), any effort with detailing will be still needed and it's hard to believe (again) that anyone without any skills, imagination and kind of taste will be able to do that really nice, so maybe things will be not so bad - I'm trying to find some positives in it, at least it's better for me than getting angry ;)
And the best parte is that no one seems to care, in the video they dont even mention our job or anything, art is something that is done because you work for It and because you love It, as you said, we are taking humanity away from us little by little with ai. If It is a tool, use it for something useful, godamn, what where this people thinking when they did this, its just unrespectful to the people Who work to Chase their dreams
@@sankaspa5738 The same can be said for photos. And yet it advanced our society. Of course this is a bigger leap, but if we were to consider everyone on the planet we would never progress on anything as a species
@@slbhugomarques2 but this doesnt make us progress in any way
Amazing work!
I loved this review! Can you do more videos with a Blue Willow comparison to other image AI generators?
A lot of people are excited in the comments. All I can see is a very efficient road to rendering artists obsolete. A future I neither really need nor one I want.
To me it just seems like yet another job, and a wonderful part of the human experience, becoming automated. Why in the world should art, one of the _VERY FEW_ jobs that people DON'T take to pay the bills have to be done by AI?
Is the plan just to crush young artists dreams?
I honestly can't really bring myself to be excited about it.
This is going to revolutionize all kinds of art and media 🙌🏽 I am hoping in the future Dalle 3 4 or 5 would have the ability to create 3D files & possible animations or even entire films 😮
Wow that sounds super cool
for an entire film you'd have to have access to an absolute monster of a pc lol
@@cursorguy The questin is which tech is gonna advance faster, AI or PC Hardware?
Aka putting artists out of work & devaluing the idea of creativity.
@@TheFatblob25 art is gonna become a hobby instead of a job
Awesome, it's about time!
Living for this background music
Make it available now!!
Sure!
crazy technology, but I wonder how this will impact creatives?!
Real amazing, I can't wait to receive my invite! This is revolutionary ! 🤯
A word of advice for OpenAI team.
You REALLY should make a USER MANUAL for the AI because most people just DONT KNOW how to use it.
Basic commands for all functions should be made available to everyone for FREE.
Are there any plans to release this version?
you can try it through the waitlist i think
What is the copyright situation on these generated images?
I believe under some software licenses it's possible for the software creators to place a copyright on material made with that software. That doesn't mean you lose the copyright for anything you put in, however. They can only copyright what they add to or change from your work.* For example, if you ask the AI to draw your character, they can only claim the rights to that image, not the specifications you gave it.
People would hate this for obvious reasons and it would be a bad deal for businesses. I'm sure they won't have such an imposing license.
*Technically you can agree to just about anything, but if the agreement is obviously unreasonable then it might not hold up in court.
Many websites automatically take a license to use anything you post on their site. You can't use their site without agreeing to this. They'll also say you can't post anything you don't hold the rights to.
At the moment you're very limited in what you do with the output if you somehow get access, but eventually it will probably be like GPT-3, which is this:
"OpenAI will not assert copyright over Content generated by the API for you or your end users."
Open is literally in their name, will they srsly have licensing over using this tech?
@@himeshkoli8607 They haven’t been open for a very long time
@@circuit10 maybe common business model like copyright if used by big businesses?
This is crazy. Can't wait for the future. Never through that this would've been possible in 2022.
if I use one image created with DALL-e in the thumbnail of a youtube video, am i free NOT to include any reference that the image in the thumbnail was created with DALL-e? or am i enforced to include some kind of attribution? Thanks
Honestly I see this and just feel depressed. Creating / expressing art is such a human quality, and I fear things like this is going to take that away.
Did a hammer or a paint brush take that away? It’s just a tool, we will always find new ways of using tools and being creative
@@Mopsie *Until you realize that everything that makes you a person is nothing more than a biological computer that can be surpassed within the next few years*
Nobody will stop you from crating experssing your own art the old fashioned way. When the photo camera was invented some people thought it would make artists redundant, but art made by humans became more valued and popular than ever. People will still pay more money for art painted on a real canvas.
@@Mopsie No, but the car did take the horses away. And automation is already putting a lot of jobs at risk. All just tools, but still rendering something else obsolete.
It may only be a tool now, but to me this is the first steps on a path to a world where most art is made entirely by AI, and I don't see why that wouldn't be the case if we continue on this path. Clicking the "make movie" or "write book" button will be far, far cheaper and more accessible than going through the actual artmaking process.
When a tool becomes powerful enough to do a job for you, you are no longer needed.
@@Mopsie hammer or paint bush is a tool and they will not build a house only if you tell them "build me a house". DALL-E is not a tool, it is doing something instead of you and killing creativity and human beauty of art in the same time.
It's both brilliant and at the same time kinda scary. Certainly it's technical capability is incredible and it opens the door to all kinds of weird and wonderful new imagery. Though I take some issues with the notion of it "amplifying our creative potential".... Is that statement really valid when it reduces the need for human artistry and skill to just typing a few words? The same could be said for AI music generators. It's certainly a clever system but I'm really conflicted over whether it actually enhaces humanity or deminishes us buy making our own creative faculties increasingly redundant. 🤔
Just a sample for the public of what AI can do, amazing!
Great work👏
A artist that I deeply admire described Dalle2 perfectly.Its impressive just like any other simular product. It's interesting. But most importantly it is to art what reality TV is to the human experience. It's a soulless commercial tool, made by people that want to milk every last bit of authenticity they can get their hands on for its last dime. Given that OpenAI is basically the NFT-tech bro of AI companies I would rather support any other simular project than this.
They are probably perfected and published by a less greedy company before Dalle2 is available
I'm an artist who wants to work with eather ilustration, comics, and animation, and the only thing I'm good at it art, and visual story telling. This makes me sceard for my future. I literally pray to every God, Godess, Demon, and Angel from every religion, and mythology in the hopes, that at least one of them is reall, and listens my prays, for the survivel of indi projects, and indi animaters, ilustration artists, comic artists, and artists.
@@Alexandraadftxr7052 now that OpenAI was trashed by more ethical services, you can use this tool to your advantage
AI tools like GPT-3, DALL-E, and Codex are going to replace so many jobs in the near future. Here's hoping universal basic income becomes a thing, because we don't even need Sci-fi movie level AI for it to be extremely disruptive.
I wonder what it'll do to collective human creativity?
I hear a lot of tech bros saying "you don't need to worry that this is going to replace your life''s work, because we'll not need jobs in like a few years."
Realistically, I don't see such a major restructuring of *all of current human economy* like that happening any time soon. A lot of people will be probably out of a job for a long time, including people like artists or musicians who rather like their job, to the point that it's their purpose of living.
Amazing I cant wait to see what is created.
What if you give it a specific x,y,z measurements. Will it scale properly
Almost unbelievable!
We've seen and experimented with some previous A.I.
When this is released, will be a true gamechanger!
10 Best TH-cam Bots for Boosting Views, Likes & Subscribers!
This is mind blowing tech and the implications are incredible. This is going to pave the way for Ai driven entertainment. is this a tool or a means to an end for designers and creatives alike. Exciting times.
I disagree.
it's Pandora's box.
@@TheFatblob25 I don’t disagree that Pandora’s box has opened, but the progress humanity is making technology is inevitable, you could say that switching the World Wide Web was ‘Pandoras box’
The fact is, this is happening and also this is a great tool for people to be able to express the creative ideas in their head.
@@justinhackney5704 We agree on the power of the internet. I myself have been a beneficiary.. At the same time I recognize the power it has to completely upend aspects of human society. This is a big leap & at least from a basic level,. Human creativity is irrelevant to 90% of web commerce
Yooo! Beyond that I'm speechless.
Wow! Incredible indeed.
Saying that this is amazing and astonishing would be an understatement. But as a technical artist, I'm shitting my pants right now.
I've been playing around with the Beta for a day or two now, I'm very impressed with it's fidelity, but also unfortunately underwhelmed by it's lack of flexibility/creativity.
A simple prompt like "A bathroom in the style of H.R Giger", when input in crAIyon delivers exactly what you'd imagine, a bathroom with biomechanical xenomorph looking surfaces and pipes, while Dall-e delivered bathroom's that are mostly flat metal with odd sinks.
I tried "Spock and Kirk in Among Us" with crAIyon and got a blue crewmate who who's visor/helmet was shaped like Spock's bowl cut hair. When I tried the same prompt in Dall-e, I got what looked like 1990s video game box art render of two people, neither looking like Spock or Kirk or anything remotely Among Us related in the background. I tried being more verbose with Dall-e, submitting: "A screenshot from the video game 'Among Us', with the crew-members customized to look like Star Trek's Starfleet officers". It backfired spectacularly and gave me something that looked like another low budget CW young adults series.
Pardon if I'm sounding overly critical, but I've been generating content for months using other (less-refined) neural-nets, and had very high expectations for Dall-E. I will be putting Google's Imagen through the same type of tests when/if ever it becomes available.
Interesting point you made.
Maybe its network is not connected to pop-culture references, but it just uses nouns / verbs / adjectives and the human logic we give them. It's very difficult to teach a machine "in the style of" because even in the human world that is very interpretable and hard to define except for very famous cases that launched an entire genre of art.
Maybe if you tell it "in the style of Van Gogh" it will know because he's such a well known artist?
For example I tried using terms such as surrealism and it worked just fine.
This is just about the coolest thing I’ve ever seen
The problem is I think this is fine; but the inevitable future versions of this are not going to be okay....
When concept artists that spent decades or two honing their craft suddenly find themselves jobless and people start committing suicide, we'll start asking if it was a good idea but it will be too late to do anything. You can't go back once you've pushed technology forward, if you won't do it someone else will.
Um you okay pal? Really suicide over arts? Also if AI really do became compatible to takr our jobs the government have no choice but limit what the ai can do.
@@ForceInEvHorizon >Really suicide over arts?
"Great Depression" - lol yeah, suicide over stocks!
@@ForceInEvHorizon I don't know if you've ever cared about something, a hobby or person you're really passionate about. But for artists, they generally care a lot about their art. Hell, for some (especially some historical figures) that outlet is the only thing _keeping_ them from committing suicide.
But even for the ones who are perfectly mentally sound, art can be the purposes of their existence. I would consider it the purpose of mine. Something higher than yourself to strive for and perfect, and a reason to stick around. Our meanings of life, if you will.
Removing the purpose of someone's life, if I may be a bit dramatic, is akin to taking away a devoted mother's child. Akin to crippling an ambitious athlete for life. Or like killing God in front of a Monk.
It's their reason for living, why _wouldn't_ they care?
(And as the previous response said, people have committed suicide over less meaningful things, I suppose.)
@@sirreginaldfishingtonxvii6149 I've tried dall e. It might be better than real human artist but there is Soo much restrictions.
@@ForceInEvHorizon The technology is progressing at unprecedented rates. The original Dall-E is already outdated (and, might I add, was hardly better than at least 75% of artists.)
But that wasn't the point, anyhow.
Holy shit! As if Dall-e was not enough. This thing is yet another level. I am curious to know how they did it
Read their research paper
can we use the created images for commercial purposes?
I have so many ideas for Vladimir Purin wearing funny hats.
What a time to be alife!
Where the heck are we going to, the future is scary 😟
I'm thinking about how we ended up in the future with AI, I'm worried
Incredible!
I‘m a proud investor.
YES FINALLY MY FAVORITE AI BUT BETTER
I know a lot of illustrators concerned for their jobs because of this
I've been an artist/graphicdesigner/illustrator for over 40 years, yup I started out analog. This is amazing, but yes I am concerned for the future of the art world...however I will point out that it is the very real" human energy" that an artist transfers to their art that make a piece of original art elicit response. Artists will know I speak of the [emotional/mental struggle /anguish/joy/pain etc.] that artists experience as they work ...this energy is reflected on original man-made works...that is why the original works are great...not sure AI will be able to capture that energyon its works. Progress is unstoppable however, and I am just as enchanted by this version of Dall-E as everyone else ; I am also eagerly awaiting my Dick Tracy translator watch, and my Beam me up Scotty teleportor. : )
Oh that's gonna be great for royalty free textures
Absolutely amazing
I hate how 'safe' is a real parameter for ai development people. World lives in so much unconditional fear.
I think of of the most interesting usage of this is interpreting dreams. If you can remember scenes from your dreams and tell DALL-E to make an image of it then you can make some interpretations. I would love to try that. It probably also would be interesting in a psychoanalytical perspective.
I totally agree! This tool put into psychotherapy/psychoanalysis should be very interesting.
Man, most of my dreams would get me banned for content violations, lul.
@@cortster12 lol when my dreams are just nazi's and boobs
@@cortster12 haha
this is truly amazing
0:13 that koala is ballin
Could we create videos with this in the future? Or even interactive game worlds instantly rendered from what you type in in real time? You could basically recreate a lucid dream with that if used together with VR
I am sure there is no way this will be abused ...
How can I get access to using this? I could make the storyboards for a fantasy film with this! Really easily, it’ll save so much time
20 years ago when i was a kid i used to think of a machine that would create videos that i think in my mind.
Can DALLE-2 be used for diagnostic imaging? Like for CT or MRI images if they are "grainy" and have the AI enhance them. CT scans use a lot of radiation and if the radiation dose could be lowered using AI that would be amazing. With MRI scans, it takes a long time to acquire images and maybe AI could be used to reduce scan times.
We have different things for stuff like that, "Denoising algorithms" or "Noise reduction algorithms" they're used in 3D modeling to reduce noise after the raytracing is done
This is about to cross a very serious line, OpenAI in the wrong hands, (code always falls into the wrong hands) will make deep fakes look , sound, and eventually feel like the stuff of dreams, but will be humanity's worst nightmare.
says who?
deepfakes are going to be close to reality, people just need to be understanding of the fact that literally anything you see can be fabricated. It already is reality.
I don't see how once this becomes public knowledge it can still be used to decieve people.
Whats the background music being played in this, its so amazing !!
This is in fact so dangerous... ! Everyone is a gangster until Chat GPT Stars having vivid dreams... 😅😂😂😂
When will you pay all the artists for using their art/artstyle? Did you get the permission to use their art for your ai learining?
Imagine all the r34 that'll be made by this.
This is gonna be game changing for stock photo
i love this program, use it everyday
this is straight up amazing, could you also make a tutorial on how you did it, I don't mean as in the whole project but like lets say 2 images
I think it's similar to dalle. You can read the paper and code open source.
A tutorial lol, seriously? Though I agree they could've put at least a quick and rough explanation of how it works à la 2minute papers in their "explained" video.
You mean like how to interact with the software itself? I would also like to know lol. Currently people are on the waitlist to try it. But they have another previous iteration of the model called Dall-E 1. I think you can try that
Amazing tech. The future is going to be interesting for graphic designers...
Wont they get replaced by those kind of AI's? Or are they safe?
@@enzu4221 No one is safe.
No, it wont. imagine this technology in its best stage in the hands of large and not so large corporations. Do you think they are going to hire a creative when they can do it themselves through phrases? "You will have nothing and you will be happy" begins to gain strength.
This is truly remarkable. And if you can create these images now, you will be able to create videos pretty soon. I want my GAI bot now :)
Goodluck, they won't release their code. You would be better off relying on stable diffusion.
I am obsessed. I am so freaking excited.
What if people use this tool to generate some photos that could posed as a threat to politics or anything in our life? Would there be a way to identify the authenticity of the image?
they have tos
if you did something bad it will block it
The problem with AI systems is that they reduce human work but a lot of people need any work they can get. It can be advertised as human friendly or whatever, but we know its not in the bigger view. Tech is moving forward faster than the world in many parts. Its progress can literally starve people to death before we get to the super intelligent AI part.
At some point, it may get rid of all our jobs and the only ones who live a decent life would be the rich people. Although, if everyone else is poor, how would they remain rich for long? No one buys from them. We need provision of free money much sooner to reduce the negative impact.
Yeah there will be a revolution against the rich who earned their money before AI disrupted the possibility for new generations of people to make a living. Why should people recognize and bow to this old money if they can no longer realistically earn it themselves? I think not! That's no longer capitalism, but a form of slavery. But the solution I think is that AI will also inadvertently disrupt the very notion of money and wealth and even power.
Проблема не в искусственном интеллекте и не в развитии, а в том что миром правят глупые и жадные люди. Уже сейчас возможно устранить голод на всей планете, если бы богатые этого захотели. Голод создан специально, а многие люди думают что голод это просто плохая судьба.
Fantastic !
I dont get why this isnt public, isnt your name *OPEN* AI?
its working for free now , you just need to create an account and log in, you will have 50 points to waste on creating paintings (1point=1painting) , when you ran out of points you can pay 15 dollars for 115 more paintings, but you can create a new account and it will give you 50 paintings again for free, i use the DALL·E 2 right now.
when u make dis public tho