Shooting a large bear out of a mortar named "Man Cannon" up in the air so that it can use a parachute to land safely in enemy territory is an absolute gem of an idea and mental image.
My favorite has to be the Natasha snipe on one guy on an aircraft carrier, which is usually manned by 100s of people. and so you can order your bear to enter it and seize full control.
@@doopsvitus Late reply, but according to the ingame files, The Aircraft Carrier is actually pretty much unmanned other than the captain, so yeah except for the bear part
I love how the engineer does more damage than a conscript, I once made an army of them wich confused my enemy leading to him making loads of anti infantry infantry expecting they were even weaker than conscripts, turns out he was wrong
@@pheeku6996 in terms of fighting yes, in terms of money not so much, also they got no molotov And I don't know how fast they attack, a conscript might have better dps but lower attack damage
@@AverageSCPFan you are not very well educated in Soviet history. The hammer and sickle is the symbol of communism, and is pretty much always associated with the Soviet Union. You don't get it mate
Terror drone is like the "don't let the bug bite" for the giga fortress. Once the giga fortress lands down, it simply is high vulnerable to these type of unkillable unit once on.
Why steal weapons when you already have powerful weapons yourself, plus the leech beam takes a looong time to actually damage, i would just use engineers
@@punless4873 1st you dont need to destroy the tank *by* the leech beam, you need it to still be leeching when the tank is destroyed 2nd what do u mean engineers? Hammer tanks dont steal weapons from structures
Actually, they did. Soviets had thousands of IS and KV tanks which then hammered German units. But Soviet tank personnel were not as skilled as Germans, therefore they couldn't fully exploit the potential of those powerful tanks.
what they have in place of the Allies' amphibious battleship is a torpedo battle sub which is arguably better than Empire's torpedo cruiser. their heavy bombardment ship is highly inaccurate though, unlike the other factions, but they make up with a strong anti-personel/anti-armor amphibious vehicle (tesla is high tier damage!) and an ambhibious anti-air transport
@@alamrasyidi4097 The japanese Naginata anti armor ship is better than the Akula sub as it will always fire first and even have a slightly better fire rate. The Akula has to emerge so that it can fire and even the ultra torpedoes that can be fired while underwater won't save it if the Naginata uses it's special ability in close quarters. Not even to mention the fact that the japanese can upgrade their navy with the Fortified Fleet protocol, making all their dedicated ships even more resistant.
If you set graphic setting to High-Ultra. It will beautiful like this. (But in multiplayer most people set graphic to LOW to prevent some unexpected lag.)
@@aomaom168 I don't know for certain if Boris can swim or not, he kinda just refuses to swim in certain waters I guess. If you ask me, he probably thinks it's below him
i think the conscript is a better standard infantry overall but next to imperial soldiers are alright, mostly i dont have to sacrifice infantry to clear a garrisoned structured iwth conscripts
It also doesn't matter if you have to sacrifice a conscript... though I think the conscript cost reduce upgrade need to be put up as one of the first upgrade because conscript aren't particularly good against other infantry.
The reason Tesla Tanks weren't given an info dialogue because of which in my theoretical reason, they're Tesla Troopers but more heavily armored and they cannot be produced.
@@kauske Trouble with Boris that he was screwed against Tanya and not swimming kinda screws him since he can't shoot and defend the transport where I think Natasha could shoot and summon migs from the water. Boris was a lot of fun too, though
And Tanya can't deal with gatling tanks, or the basic anti infantry turrets. Tanya is also discounted as any allied player can build cheaper SEALs they are just about as good, minus the suicidal C4 a tank option.
3:10 that video is bulls@it! you have to wait until the sputnik transforms into an outpost BEFORE you can place buildings. this example's base must have had another MCV or crusher crane in order to build that whilst the sputnik was still converting.
Even after 10 years I am still too stupid for this game. I completed every command and conquer before, every Age of Empires and even Desperados. But this game drove me insane.
Boris > Jarmen > Natasha Natasha can swim is just for the balance since every commando units in RA3 can swim and General doesnt have naval combat so this trait is nullified
I really disliked the change about oıe system and as well as with ore collectors. this was a really nice balance in ra2 that the soviet collector is heavy slow but armed with a machine gun and can carry up to 1000 ore at once but chrono miner counter part is fast and teleporting but unarmed and can only carry 500 ore at once. This was pretty challengeful and also it was funny to watch war miners shoting at poor chrono miners while they r collecting from same place xD like: War miner: Get off from here little allied pony this ore is mine. Chrono miner: You have to do better than that fuzzy.
Punishing to the old style of turtling is actually nice...You can't just sit on a field and mine it all you want. And you only have funds issue if you can't manage your funds and not going out to contest those resource nodes...
Uprising sucks cause it brings the Allies and the Empire counters to almost every Soviet heavy unit, but Soviets got nothing back. FOUR new Ally heavy units againist a fucking motorcycle and melee vehicle, are you kidding me?
*Ra2:* Isn't micromanagement hell. *Ra3:* aLl tHe SpEcIaL aBiLiTies! Ra3 was trash, they spent more money and time on cutscenes that actually making a decent game. Naw, just make it like starcraft, 'cause that's what sells, right? And now the entire franchise is dead.
Not me, I'd rather focus on the overall strategy, than trying to manage my units in each and every little skirmish by having to activate abilities and transformations. If I wanted starcraft, _I would play starcraft._
Actually, there are Tesla Tanks in RA3, but oficially they're only used twice during the soviet campaign, and cannot be created like other vehicles. A shame, if you ask me.
@@patricksouza2479 you can capture the premiers war factories in "the stone faced witnesses", those have Tesla tanks (the replace the hammer tank on the individual factories menu)
Tesla tanks were not introduced as the main units in the campaign, they could not be built anywhere and were only available in the last mission about the USSR
The apocalypse tank in this version just look like a piece of crap.The 2d apocalypse design in ra2 look way better than this...and can't attack air units... So if enemy send a bunch of air units it totally useless...
Is it really that hard to build a couple of bullfrogs or migs to support the apocalypse tanks? I hated apoc tanks in RA2 because they could deal with almost anything. It's good that they gave it some more weaknesses in RA3.
Against the armor and buildings in game wise, RA3 Apocalypse is slightly more effective than RA2's apocalypse. However I would prefer RA2 one. RA2 one looks more modern, realistic and sophisticated (well it has guided AA missiles).
terror drones in RA 3 somehow overpower to me, it instantly kills vehical not slowly kills in old version. Kirov ability not quite good, like suicide itself, wish they gain it an ability is to switch from dropping bomb to machine gun defense. I think he missing a unit - riding motorcycle and half machinegun half launching missile or something, don't remember
Half of the fun of the Red Alert series is the fact it's over-exagerated for what the times are supposed to be Reason why the first Red Alert isn't as popular as RA2. I mean dude, RA2 had the Prism Tank. That thing is straight up futuristic
"same units" wow! look at that huge double barreled tank that can crush almost anything under its treads! what's its japanese counterpart? a giant robot with laser eyes that can charge into either a crowd of tanks or buildings! yeah so similar lol.
Oh boy, the Allies have this cool freezy helicopter that looks like it's from the 2000s! Oh boy, the Soviets have this 1970s helicopter that shoots fireball thingys/rockets! Oh boy, the Japanese have this massive walker that can shoot missiles at planes or become a cool helicopter that shoots missiles at buildings! _Very_ similar indeed. (that was sarcasm)
Realism..................HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Also RA3 was NOT AT ALL about any sort of realism. It was FUN COOL and FLASHY...It is not meant to be serious in any capacity.
@@Catherine_772 No! That is a bad way to do thing. YOU DON'T HALF-ASS "REALISM" into things. Either go whole-hog and embrace the madness, or not at all.
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 3 // FNC vs FUT | EDG vs PRX](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pw2T5v0ogDI/mqdefault.jpg)
Shooting a large bear out of a mortar named "Man Cannon" up in the air so that it can use a parachute to land safely in enemy territory is an absolute gem of an idea and mental image.
My favorite has to be the Natasha snipe on one guy on an aircraft carrier, which is usually manned by 100s of people. and so you can order your bear to enter it and seize full control.
@@doopsvitus Bears can't man vehicles, engies can tho.
@@doopsvitus Late reply, but according to the ingame files, The Aircraft Carrier is actually pretty much unmanned other than the captain, so yeah except for the bear part
Oh! Sputniks!
Get it?
Cause they're *satellite bases?*
No, because its a modified sputnik
Heh, very clever
The entire unit is oen big joke.
I love how the engineer does more damage than a conscript, I once made an army of them wich confused my enemy leading to him making loads of anti infantry infantry expecting they were even weaker than conscripts, turns out he was wrong
So it would be wise to abandon conscripts and just use engineers?
@@pheeku6996 in terms of fighting yes, in terms of money not so much, also they got no molotov
And I don't know how fast they attack, a conscript might have better dps but lower attack damage
@@dataexpunged3914 no molotov, but they can just take the buildings instead lol
@@alamrasyidi4097 it's like Yuri lol, why destroy the enemy? When you can just control them
Huh how the music turns to a choir when the apocalypse tank shows up. perfect timing I say
Genious editing
Sickle, hammer tank, coincidence? I think not!
Hehehe I see what you did there boy
@@AverageSCPFan you are not very well educated in Soviet history. The hammer and sickle is the symbol of communism, and is pretty much always associated with the Soviet Union. You don't get it mate
@@AverageSCPFan sorry if I insulted you bro
I made this like 2 years ago and so many recent comments
@@Mothlord03 *this is now a recent comment*
Apocalypse Tank : *GET OVER HERE! *
Scorpion wins ! Apocalypsality
Terror drone is like the "don't let the bug bite" for the giga fortress. Once the giga fortress lands down, it simply is high vulnerable to these type of unkillable unit once on.
fun fact best ground for soviets is hammer tank it can rip the super weapon from high tech vehicles
Basically, build 20 Hammer tanks and a couple of bullfrogs
@@Tucher97 you need some anti air
Why steal weapons when you already have powerful weapons yourself, plus the leech beam takes a looong time to actually damage, i would just use engineers
@@punless4873 1st you dont need to destroy the tank *by* the leech beam, you need it to still be leeching when the tank is destroyed
2nd what do u mean engineers? Hammer tanks dont steal weapons from structures
Everyone's gangsta till the enemy's hammer tank has an athena cannon attached to it
Twinblades, the Hinds of an alternate timeline.
Yeah but they save Romanov during in Yuri's revenge
I can imagine if Russia built the Apocalypse tank in World War 2.
Socialist Brony DESTROY NAZIS FASTER!
well, this version is not strongest. the strongest version is in ra2 (nuclear engine, thicker armour, armed with anti-air missile)
krebs' fish I don't think it matters either way. Both would easily destroy any German tank. Even the Maus wouldn't stand a chance
Actually, they did. Soviets had thousands of IS and KV tanks which then hammered German units. But Soviet tank personnel were not as skilled as Germans, therefore they couldn't fully exploit the potential of those powerful tanks.
the USSR will lose.these tanks are not practical
red alert 2: tesla troopers
red alert 3: tesla robots
Did you mean red alert 2 shock trooper the old of it is named like that and wait can i buy hotdogs i got 19g sans
Anthony Orbasido no
@@zangooey7915 the tesla trooper is originally called shock trooper
RA1 tesla troopers.
RA2 tesla suit.
RA3 tesla mech.
Are y'all high? There's a person inside the suit.
The bullfrogs design kinda reminds me of the fallout 4 military armored transport
same sort of head space Divergent timelines and whatnot
The Soviets had the strongest ground units in the game and a decent Air Force, but its navy could have used a little more power
what they have in place of the Allies' amphibious battleship is a torpedo battle sub which is arguably better than Empire's torpedo cruiser. their heavy bombardment ship is highly inaccurate though, unlike the other factions, but they make up with a strong anti-personel/anti-armor amphibious vehicle (tesla is high tier damage!) and an ambhibious anti-air transport
@@alamrasyidi4097 The japanese Naginata anti armor ship is better than the Akula sub as it will always fire first and even have a slightly better fire rate. The Akula has to emerge so that it can fire and even the ultra torpedoes that can be fired while underwater won't save it if the Naginata uses it's special ability in close quarters.
Not even to mention the fact that the japanese can upgrade their navy with the Fortified Fleet protocol, making all their dedicated ships even more resistant.
I haven't seen most of these special abilities ever used in a lets play. Interesting to know they exist.
I have watched to many videos for guys playing this game but I have never seen such graphics in it.
If you set graphic setting to High-Ultra. It will beautiful like this. (But in multiplayer most people set graphic to LOW to prevent some unexpected lag.)
7:10 KIROV REPORTING
"Natasha can call in Air Strikes!" Boris did that first!
"She can also snipe drivers for units to take over it!" Jarmen Kell did that first...
Boris and JK's love child, no homo
Exept Jarmen kell returned in generals 2 cancelled i think...
Natasha can swim but boris cant
@@aomaom168 I don't know for certain if Boris can swim or not, he kinda just refuses to swim in certain waters I guess. If you ask me, he probably thinks it's below him
natasha = tf2 heavy weapons XD
XD
It's Natascha for exactly, it's hilarious when Valve mean to mistake the word or reverse it like the Dalokohs Bar
Fun fact: you can attack your own units while pressing Ctrl. Thus, why not give your hammer bois some AA protection or missiles?
You can do that actually but it's not worth it in my opinion
It will cost you your anti-air vehicle
@@JohnDarksoul98atleast its like an red alert 2 apocalypes tanks
I never knew Natasha could kill a tank pilot holy shit I will use this tactic
I like this designs for this Game my friends. Thanks.
Natasha's Weapon: Sniper Shotgun
My brother bought this game before its delivered I want to see what the units do
i think the conscript is a better standard infantry overall but next to imperial soldiers are alright, mostly i dont have to sacrifice infantry to clear a garrisoned structured iwth conscripts
It also doesn't matter if you have to sacrifice a conscript...
though I think the conscript cost reduce upgrade need to be put up as one of the first upgrade because conscript aren't particularly good against other infantry.
Can imagine that the apocalypse tank is big now, in red alert 2 it just black and little red, but in red alert 3 its very high detailed now!😁😮
Yes
The reason Tesla Tanks weren't given an info dialogue because of which in my theoretical reason, they're Tesla Troopers but more heavily armored and they cannot be produced.
6:24 3rd fav
War bears.... Natasha..... Sputnik......
Original names there, yankees ;D
Boris was better, Natasha is just a reskinned Jarman Kell from Generals.
@@kauske At least Natasha swims
Boris was more useful at killing armoured vehicles. Having to use a transport was plenty fair trade off for that at the migs.
@@kauske Trouble with Boris that he was screwed against Tanya and not swimming kinda screws him since he can't shoot and defend the transport where I think Natasha could shoot and summon migs from the water. Boris was a lot of fun too, though
And Tanya can't deal with gatling tanks, or the basic anti infantry turrets. Tanya is also discounted as any allied player can build cheaper SEALs they are just about as good, minus the suicidal C4 a tank option.
Conscript
Present Times….
3:10 that video is bulls@it! you have to wait until the sputnik transforms into an outpost BEFORE you can place buildings. this example's base must have had another MCV or crusher crane in order to build that whilst the sputnik was still converting.
Even after 10 years I am still too stupid for this game. I completed every command and conquer before, every Age of Empires and even Desperados. But this game drove me insane.
I hate the fact that natasha was a rip off of both Jarmen Kell and boris
i dont see jarmen kill piercing through infantries :V Boris and Jarmen cant swim lol
Yea trade power for utility seems fair to me
Special ability came from Jarmen. He can kill vehicle operators too.
Boris > Jarmen > Natasha
Natasha can swim is just for the balance since every commando units in RA3 can swim and General doesnt have naval combat so this trait is nullified
natasha is a female commando,boris is a male character uses ak-47,
I really disliked the change about oıe system and as well as with ore collectors. this was a really nice balance in ra2 that the soviet collector is heavy slow but armed with a machine gun and can carry up to 1000 ore at once but chrono miner counter part is fast and teleporting but unarmed and can only carry 500 ore at once. This was pretty challengeful and also it was funny to watch war miners shoting at poor chrono miners while they r collecting from same place xD like:
War miner: Get off from here little allied pony this ore is mine.
Chrono miner: You have to do better than that fuzzy.
Punishing to the old style of turtling is actually nice...You can't just sit on a field and mine it all you want.
And you only have funds issue if you can't manage your funds and not going out to contest those resource nodes...
Disagree
this video is so useful
Terror drone infesting Allied vehicle
Allied Engineer IFV: "Pffffbt, please..."
Natasha - Me in Swat Vs Criminal
What about that Giant spider tank that can turn himself into a structure ?
That'll be in the expansion, and it's called a Reaper.
*EA:* lEtS mAkE eVeRy UnIt HaVe MiCro MaNaGeMeNt HeLl aBiLiTiEs! iT'lL bE jUsT lIkE sTaRcRaFt!
*C&C fans:* _FML_
my units are stuck in the walls
((
Uprising sucks cause it brings the Allies and the Empire counters to almost every Soviet heavy unit, but Soviets got nothing back. FOUR new Ally heavy units againist a fucking motorcycle and melee vehicle, are you kidding me?
Soviet are my favourite faction
Natasha is look like boris
But her weapon is very Different
you guys should check out KnightVVV's RA3 remix mod.
we know
My most fave is Hammer tank 😍😍😍
yea
For the motherland!
Fatherland, not motherland. For the Fatherland!
@@user-no1nj9ji1d I thought Germany was the Fatherland and Russia the Motherland. At least I've heard the conscripts say "Mother Russia"
Bear is literaly getting paint red and yellow thats an animal abuse!!!!
Boris vs. Natasha
Apocalypse tank in Ra2
They have Anti air Missile
In red alert 3 Apocalypse Tank doesnt have
Anti air missile
Only hammer Tank
*Ra2:* Isn't micromanagement hell.
*Ra3:* aLl tHe SpEcIaL aBiLiTies!
Ra3 was trash, they spent more money and time on cutscenes that actually making a decent game. Naw, just make it like starcraft, 'cause that's what sells, right? And now the entire franchise is dead.
Not me, I'd rather focus on the overall strategy, than trying to manage my units in each and every little skirmish by having to activate abilities and transformations. If I wanted starcraft, _I would play starcraft._
I prefer RA3. I love that there are three different factions and not just two. Besides, the special abilities provide more tactical depth
Yes
Soviet aa, best aa
legit hammer tank op
You said well Коmrad, good luck from Яussia.
poor flak troopers its either prison or the front lines lol shitty choices there lives must really suck
5:33 song name?
Soviet epic song
Soviet:Our Best Small Word Is URA!
Basically Natasha is Morales in Mental Omega mod
Am in me'mums car. Broom broom
Natasha have same ability like Boris
Mother RUSSIA rules 1!!!
I still love my old ra2 apocalypse tank
yea its still better have more armor and more damage plua its an anti air
Sputnik Kind Cute
Where is my boi tesla tank?
José Tomás Riveros Ovalle you get Tesla ship, Stalin has taken all the Tesla tanks for “redistribution” among the working class
Tesla Tanks appear in the expansion, RA3 Uprising I believe it was.
war bear
Poor flak troopers hah jailbirds
I dont undeяstand wat you say империалисты
war bears?????????
War bears
@@Mothlord03 great
Wow i forgot that Hammer tanks can do that with their ability
Because how often did you do the secondary abilities? They'd usually die beforehand
this is pastige of first Red Alert
EA.... Next time make Soviet unit stronger like in RA1 and (Heavy Tank and Mammoth tank) RA2 (Heavy Tank and Mammoth tank 2.0)
Conscripts are perfect for when you need to plant a flag on the Reichstag.
Wot no squit
Bruh Yuri is non-existence ever since the time travel
Who need that bastards
What about tesla tanks? xD
no tesla tank in ra3
instead you get a amphibious ship armed with tesla coils that can blanket a whole area
Actually, there are Tesla Tanks in RA3, but oficially they're only used twice during the soviet campaign, and cannot be created like other vehicles. A shame, if you ask me.
@@patricksouza2479 you can capture the premiers war factories in "the stone faced witnesses", those have Tesla tanks (the replace the hammer tank on the individual factories menu)
@@f-22raptorlandingzone30 thx bro;)
Where Tesla tanks?
Not available for construction, unfortunately.
They are present in the game, but they are just stingrays on hammer tank chassis
I thought she says
Flak troopers are communist
Kirov reporting
Russian power supreme
What is really disappointing about the Soviets in RA3, is that they do not have the tesla tank
They do in 2 missions
Stingrays do the same
Comrade Romanov take all of them for himself...You get Tesla ships...
They are campaign only but can be unlocked with mod.
Where tesla tank
Tesla tanks were not introduced as the main units in the campaign, they could not be built anywhere and were only available in the last mission about the USSR
The apocalypse tank in this version just look like a piece of crap.The 2d apocalypse design in ra2 look way better than this...and can't attack air units... So if enemy send a bunch of air units it totally useless...
Is it really that hard to build a couple of bullfrogs or migs to support the apocalypse tanks? I hated apoc tanks in RA2 because they could deal with almost anything. It's good that they gave it some more weaknesses in RA3.
@@alwang9690 correct
Against the armor and buildings in game wise, RA3 Apocalypse is slightly more effective than RA2's apocalypse. However I would prefer RA2 one. RA2 one looks more modern, realistic and sophisticated (well it has guided AA missiles).
Red Alert 2 Yuris Revenge was much better game than Red Alert 3
terror drones in RA 3 somehow overpower to me, it instantly kills vehical not slowly kills in old version. Kirov ability not quite good, like suicide itself, wish they gain it an ability is to switch from dropping bomb to machine gun defense. I think he missing a unit - riding motorcycle and half machinegun half launching missile or something, don't remember
Terror drones do take time to kill, IFVs are just kinda flimsy.
He is missing Uprising units. And Tesla tanks.
designs are stupid. hammer tanks looks out of time. it would be something cabal or nod would use
Half of the fun of the Red Alert series is the fact it's over-exagerated for what the times are supposed to be
Reason why the first Red Alert isn't as popular as RA2.
I mean dude, RA2 had the Prism Tank. That thing is straight up futuristic
The game still take place in the mid 80's
Rampager well sickle
Well because they came back in time they changed the world and it became futuristic
Rampager and now reaper
Natasha fuck that jarem kill i forgot his name his the sniper from gla
rip what have they done to ra
"Kadyrovets", "opolchenets"..😎
Wagnerovets
Wagnerovets, Kadyrovets
Nice video, but... #NotMyCNC !!!
model are very bad stupid EA
The worst RA game ever.
AndrewBaker101 I don't even coun't it as a C&C game, its just a fucking money trap
:(
RA 2 hala benim için en iyisi ama bu oyunda fena değil
Wrong
Ikr...
Embarrassing game design where all factions have the same units renamed and recoloured
Not really unique at all
"same units"
wow! look at that huge double barreled tank that can crush almost anything under its treads! what's its japanese counterpart? a giant robot with laser eyes that can charge into either a crowd of tanks or buildings!
yeah so similar lol.
@@alwang9690 correct, And vehícules in RA2 looks as cheap micromachines, nostalgia blinds a lot
Oh boy, the Allies have this cool freezy helicopter that looks like it's from the 2000s!
Oh boy, the Soviets have this 1970s helicopter that shoots fireball thingys/rockets!
Oh boy, the Japanese have this massive walker that can shoot missiles at planes or become a cool helicopter that shoots missiles at buildings!
_Very_ similar indeed.
(that was sarcasm)
Red Alert 3 was not good :/
The tank design here is shit. Looks too rounded. Tanks are edgy and boxy. They look more like toys compared to their ra2 ancestors.
The RA2 looks as micromachines, the nostalgia blinds a lot
Ra-1 and 2 is the best, but ra3 is piece of shit
Аргументация на уровне
This game is VERY arcade! No realism at all. (unfortunately)
Realism..................HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Also RA3 was NOT AT ALL about any sort of realism. It was FUN COOL and FLASHY...It is not meant to be serious in any capacity.
Ok, but some part of realism should exist in it
@@Catherine_772 No! That is a bad way to do thing. YOU DON'T HALF-ASS "REALISM" into things.
Either go whole-hog and embrace the madness, or not at all.
It was fun to me
What's the issue with no realism? It's fun!